Documents carryforward

At our company  commitment carryforward  is only  possible for one year, meaning that documents created in the current year and fund. e.g  year 2009 fund  A9, can be carriedforward the commitments and the budget to the next year and equal fund e.g year 2010 fund A9.
The problem arises when in 2010 the flow of documents  is not completed, meaning that my purchase order is not completed receptioned or invoiced. From that moment, the commitments can´t consume carryforward budget.
Now what it is done is:
Creating a new funds reservation  in 2011, adding a new line item to the purchase order with account assignment the new funds reservation and the quantities pending to delivered. For the ones delivered but not invoiced direct invoices are made against the new funds reservation.
I don´t know which is SAP Bestpractices for this cases in order to avoid modifying the purchase order or lost the purchase order history due to direct invoices, any suggestions?
The issue is that now refuses to go shopping in this way and wants the budgetary effects do not impact on purchasing documents. This means creating new
lose lines or purchase history to make direct invoices against the reserve.
What we were  trying was made  a commitments carriedforward this documents without budget, meaning documents that are in year 2010 fund a9 will be carryforward to fund a11 year 2011, and consume the budget of 2011, but for the commitments of a10 2010 the commitment carryforward must be with budget  and result in fund a10 year 2011.
We performed t-code fmj2 to transfer a9 2010 documents to a11 2011. But those documents dont appear at a11 2011 but neither remain at fmj2. I understand that are pending that i make the budget transfer in order they appear but as i said I dont want to transfer budget for this cases I want them  to consume from a11 2011. Is this possible and compatible with budget carryfoward for commitments to the following year. Am I missing running any t-code or customizing.
Sorry for the long  and not very clear explanation.
Best regards and thanks for the help

Finally, about your last paragraph:
"And also after finishing fmj2, instead of running fmja,fmjb and fmjc as in cases of CF with budget I dont run these tcde and I only run fm9p,fmbv and fm9qbud, but nothing happens not carryforward is done but the strange thing is that in fmj2 the documents don´t appear in order to try to run it again."
FMJ2 is for open items carryforward, i.e. EF's, PO's, invoices, etc. Then, once they have been successfully carried forward, they should not be selected by FMJ2 anymore.
If those items were CF'd with their own budget (i.e. CF via FMJ2 should include the budget already consumed by those documents), the remaining budget will stay the same in the Old FY and you would not need to run a Budget CF for those documents (i.e. you won't need FMJA, FMJB, FMJC)
If they were CF'd without their budget, then, the Residual Budget CF should be done via separate steps (FMJA, FMJB,FMJC).
I think you do not need FM9P nor FM9QBUD. Only FMBV at the end of the whole process if you ran FMJ2 without availability control.
I nevertheless suggest you to have a look at the documentation in these IMG activities, and also at the online help:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/f0/ca5716260211d28a430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Under 'Closing operations'
Let me know if this helps.
Kind regards
Mar
@contributors, please feel free to add any comments, they will be most welcome!

Similar Messages

  • Enhance Budget Entry Documents for Commitment Carryforward

    Anyone implemented the badi: Enhance Budget Entry Documents for Commitment Carryforward before?
    May I know what changes are required in order to ensure that the budget entry documents is in local currency (SGD) when commitment carryforward is in foreign currency (USD)?

    Hi,
    So, you want the budgetary document to be posted in local currency? I don't ask for reasons, though, as you probably know, even if the document is posted in foreign currency, local currency amount would be also there and the AVC would be performed also in local currency. But, if you need to change the currency, you can indeed use this BADI and modify I_BUDGET_ENTRY_DOC_SENDER and I_BUDGET_ENTRY_DOC_RECEIVER parameters, changing the currency and the amount.
    I'm not sure about your remark 'change code' as BADI does not come with any code at all. You will have to implement the BADI providing your own code to change the required fields.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Carryforward parked FI documents

    Is it possible to carryforward a parked FI document to a new fiscal year?  I have looked at a lot of documentation and it appears as if the parked document should really be deleted.  But, what we have told users is to change the posting date to the new year when the previous fiscal year is closed.  This works well for those documents that may have recently been created but did not complete workflow before fiscal year end.
    I looked at transaction FMJ2.  But, for value type, there is not a choice for "60" (parked documents).  I went through the IMG to figure out if I need to set something there but could not find anything.

    Hi Monique,
    just a couple of questions:
    Are you using the standard business object FIPP and the standard WF template? And, could you please investigate with your WF admin and find how events FIPP.REJECTED and FIPP.DELETED are being handled in your Workflow?
    And, regarding to parked documents, yes, the usual procedure is to approve or reject/delete them before the year end. If you want to move the parked document to the next fiscal year, the options would be:
    - Change the posting date to the new fiscal year: this would reduce budget in the new fiscal year. If you want to reduce budget in a different date, you could use transaction FMOD or EXIT_SAPLFMFA_004 if PBET is active in your update profile.
    - If the parked document is included in a document chain, you can carryforward the document chain (with or without budget)
    Thanks!
    Kind regards, Mar.

  • Carryforward PR/PO Commitments document-wise

    Dear Sir,
    Is there any T.code or program through which we can carryforward PR and PO commitments seperately and also by PR/PO document wise. In the same way, we also need to carryforward the budget with the selection of WBS.
    Regards
    Mudit Gupta

    Sir,
    This is true that these transactions works only for Project, Netowrk Commitments
    But we need to carry forward for WBS i.e. if there are 4 PR's and 6 PO's on one WBS, we may be able to carry only 2 Pr's and 4 PO's by putting the same WBS.
    Regards
    Mudit Gupta

  • Document type with posting level 12 not being carryforward

    Hi gurus,
    We are now implementing SEM-BCS 6.0 in the BI 7.0 server.
    We have a document type u201CMIu201D which properties are:
    Posting level: 12
    Balance check: 0 error when balance note equal to zero
    Application: Other
    Posting: Manual posting
    Inversion: No automatic inversion
    The problem is that when we execute the Balance Carryforward in the subsequent year this is the only document type that is not being carryforward.
    Why is this happening?
    Thanks for your help.
    Best regards.

    This is by design
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/0c/ab0240536fe369e10000000a155106/content.htm
    "Data records for preparatory postings for consolidation group changes are neither translated nor carried forward."
    I'll try an example...
    Company A is sold from company 1 to company 2 in June (EoP)
    For periods 0 - 6:
    BCS reports company A's balance sheet under company 1
    BCS reports company A's income statement under company 1
    starting period 7
    BCS reports company A's balance sheet under company 2
    BCS reports company A's 0 - 6 income statement under company 1
    BCS reports company A's 7 income statement under company 2
    this is managed through the posting level 02 12 and 22 document types, as well as PL30 if using CoI.
    Assuming the period of first consolidation and period of divestiture were set correctly in the groups for company 1 and company 2, BCS wants to read all 0 - 6 data under group 1 and all 7 + data under group 2.  This is obviously incorrect from an accounting standpoint and the PCC postings correct that.
    So BCS books a PL02/12/22 in group 1 to zero out the balance sheet.  It then books another set of entries in group 2 to write up the entire balance sheet in the new group.
    However, once you get to the end of the year and run your BCF, the entire balance sheet is now sitting in period 0. The system is able to report company A's balance sheet under group 2 withou the aid of the PCC documents.  Therefore, the system does not roll these documents forward into the new year.
    The PCC documents were only required because of the periodic nature of the BCS data storage vs. the LTD nature of the balance sheet for reporting.  Once the full LTD balance is available in a single period, as is the case just after a BCF, the PCC documents are no longer required.
    Anyway, hope that made some sense.  If not, I'd encourange you to create an Excel sheet replicating how BCS stores the data in the cube, perfrom a divestiture, and see why the system is not carrying forward the documents.  This is how I came to understand it.
    Now, if you're doing something "non-standard" with the PL12, all bets are off
    Good luck,
    Chris

  • Document journal - Carryforward amounts

    Hi everyone,
    When executing the document journal, the following message appears: "you should select documents as of 04.06.2008, otherwise carryforward amounts incorrect".
    I would like to know how it would be possible to print again the document journal from a date previous to 04.06.2008 with the correct carryforward amounts.
    Let's say, for instance, I would like to reprint the document journal from 03.04.2008 to 28.04.2008, cauz' I lost it?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Ronan

    Hello,
    Does anyone have any idea on the above subject?
    And also, would someone know how to reprint a document journal when it has been printed, knowing that there is no spool creation when executing the transaction?
    Where is my little guru that will answer me those so sexy question?
    Thanks in advance,
    Ronan

  • Posting of CarryForward New general ledger

    Hi financial wizards,
    our client uses new general ledger. The accounting block has been extended with some ZZ user fields carrying results determined via substitution exits during posting.
    The additional customer fields are added to the accounting block and are stored on item level (BSEG) as on aggregate level (FAGLFLEXT).
    After the run of transaction FAGLGVTR - 'Balance Carryforward (New)' we have the correct values in the carryforward column of the target account, but values from customer fields are not transfered.
    SAP will not help us with a note at this time; the features may be integrated in a later release.
    Now my question: How to post the carryforward values manually or by program? I know the SAP Carryforward does not create any documents but after the run the Carryforward period (period 0 in former times) is filled with the sums of previous years P+L accounts. Carryforward works correct i.E. for profit center but not for the additional clients fields.
    We need some good ideas as how to overcome this      obstacle.
    Regards,
    Clemens

    Dear Peter,
    I am afraid that you are mistaken. There is lot of difference between the New GL Accounting and COPA. They are entirely different and its utility is also different.
    Here in New Gl, Characteristics means, segment characteristics, for example, business area, profit center, functional area, segment.
    Trust this answers your query!
    Cheers,
    Ashok SINGH

  • Purchase Order Carryforward (FMJ2) Does Not Recognize Assignment Changes

    In our year end processing, we ran FMJ2 to do purchase order carryforward. We have about 15 documents which had erroneous carry forward amounts. In each of these documents, there was a change in account assignment in the sender fiscal year. Fields which had assignment changes included Fund, Commitment Item, and/or Funded Program.
    When FMJ2 did the carryforward, it appears to have ignored the assignment change, and ignored any subsequent activity applied to the new assignment.
    It brought forward only activity applied to the original assignment.
    Has anybody else enountered this? Can anybody tell me what may be causing this, and how to fix it?
    Thank you.
    Will assign points for solution.

    Hello Aoife,
    If you need to perform a carryforward with changes in FM Account Assignment, you should define a Derivation Strategy for reassignment on closing operations.
    So, what you could do here is to reverse the Carryforward using FMJ3, and then define this derivation strategy for reassignment and perform FMJ2 again.
    You don't specify which is the release you are working on, but nevertheless, please find more information in the SAP Library / Funds Management for SAP_APPL 470-EA-PS200:
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/f0/ca5716260211d28a430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm">Funds Management</a>
    and choose Chapter "Closing Operations-> Derivation Strategy for Reassignment with Closing Operations".
    I hope this helps.
    Kind regards,
    Mar

  • Purchase Order Carryforward Does Not Net to Zero

    We are working in a year-end test client, copy of Production, in preparation for fiscal year end closing.
    For purchase order carryforwards, we find a number of documents which do not net to zero in the sender year. This seems to occur most often for the case where a line item has split account assignments. In these cases, only one account assignment line is carried forward. The other account assignment lines are ignored.
    This does not occur for all cases where we have split assignments. We have been unable to determine what is unique about the instances where the carryforward does not work properly.
    Our system is R/3, 4.7, support stack 27.
    Has anyone else encountered this problem? If so, can you give me any guidance as to how to address it?
    Thank you.

    Hello all. Since i didn't get any replies, I don't know if there is any interest in this. However, for future reference, in case any else encounters this issue and searches the forum, here is the answer which we found:
    FMJ2 and FMJ3 process the carryforwards and reversals in blocks of 2000 lines. At the end of a block, the PO may be split up across blocks, with one or more assignment items processed in the first block, and the remaining items in the next block.
    If you have selected "Block Documents" on the initial screen, when the first item is processed, it locks the PO. When the second block attempts to process the remaining items, there is an error that the PO is locked, and these items are not processed.
    The developer is working on a correction to the code to handle this. In the meantime, there are two workarounds:
    1) Uncheck "Block Documents"
    or
    2) After processing, use FMJ3 to reverse the carryforwards which received the error. Use FMJ2 to carry them forward again, in smaller groups which are not large enough to fill up a 2000 line block, and which therefore do not encounter the problem.

  • Activate carryforward of budget for commitments

    Hello Gurus,
    When we execute carryforward for a purch order or purch requisition,
    eventhough we activated the carryforward of budget for commitments, the
    system is updating only table FMBDT.
    So the amount of the carryforward item does not affect the avaliability
    control (table FMAVCT) so we end up having more commitment on the next
    year but without the avaliability of the document carried forward.
    When we sum the record type '1 Plan' minus '0 Actual' we realize that wehave less avaliable budget than before.
    In table FMBDT the system creates a record for process 'CORV Carry For.
    Recv' for record type 1 Plan.
    We reestructure avaliability control tx FMAVCREINIT and it does nothing.
    Regards,
    Adriana.

    Hello,
    Maybe some quick check can help you trouble shoot the problem:
    1. Identify the Budget Type for Carry-forward receiver:
    Spro > Public sector management > Funds management government > Closing operations > Closing operations for BCS > Define budget entry documents for commitment carryforward; look for Settings for receiver lines and get the Budget Type.
    2. Check whether the above Budget Type is included in the AVC Ledger:
    Spro > Public sector management > Funds management government > BCS > Availarbility control > Settings for availability control leger > Define filter settings for budget values > Define the consumable budget; select ledger 9H and check whether the budget type identified in 1 is included.
    Regards,
    Ming

  • Open Item & budget Carryforward.

    Dear All!
    we are little bit confused regarding the closing procedure of  Funds Managment ( BCS).
    I'm writing the following scenerio that may I able to understant every one!
    I entered the Budget $100 and Released $ 40. When I execute the transaction FMRP_RW_BUDGET for budget overview, system display the following Information:
    Current Budget : 100 , original budget : 100 and by executing the FMRP_RW_BUDCON transaction. system display the following information
    Consulabale budget: 40 Consumed Budget: 0 Avilabale Budget : 40 and Current Budget: 100.
    Now I created the purchase order : 30, then system displaying the information by exeuting FMRP_RW_BUDCON  the cosumed budget 30  and available budget : 10
    and current budget : 100
    I carryforward the  open item (purchase order) to next year, system forward the open item & display the following information in next year by executing the above reports
    Transaction: FMRP_RW_BUDGET
    Current Budget : 30 Orginal : 0
    when I carryforward the residual budget, system carry forward the $ 70 to next year and the amount $100 is still available for release & consumabale, also the current budget become again 100 by forwarding the budget.
    please expalin what the system is doing is ut correct? why all the amount still available for consumable?
    please tell me following are the correct sequance of closing.
       1- Open Item
       2- budget ( with key figure YE_RESIDUAL)
    further, in what cases the transaction FMMC-close open item is being used?
    Thanks

    Hi MSiddique,
    We are a governmental entity. We use FMMC to close out prior year obligations (encumbrances - i.e. purchase orders, purchase requisitions) that will not get carried forward into the next fiscal year.
    For the encumbrances that remain open and will get carried forward to the next fiscal year, we use FMJ2.
    So for instance if we have 100 original and 100 current in starting out in FY06, and we have an existing purchase order for 20 and 35 was already expended (i.e. invoiced and paid), the consumed would be 55 and the available would be 45. At the beginning of FY07, only the existing encumbrances that we didn't close using FMMC will be carried forward along with the related budget of 20 using FMJ2. If 45 wasn't used it would not get carried forward (unless it involves a multi year capital project)
    The FY06 Budget would look like this
    Original 100
    Current 100
    Encumbered 20
    Expended 35
    Consumed 55
    Available 45
    After the carry forward to FY07 would look like this
    Original 130 (new approved budget for the new year-not related to FY06)
    Carryforward 20
    Current 150
    Encumbered 20
    Expended 0
    Consumed 20
    Available 130
    We had to create custom reports instead of using the standard reports.
    Our sequence of closing is as follows...
    All requisitions not converted to a P.O. gets closed - FMMC
    All P.O.s identified not to roll forward gets closed - FMMC
    All remaining P.O.s are carried forward FMJ2
    FMJ2 rolls forward the remaining P.O.s as well as creates a budget document for the new fiscal year (but we keep it seperate from the original by using a carryforward column. I hope this helps.

  • How to do Commitment item carryforward (Fund Management) ?

    Dear experts,
    Please guide me how to do commitment item carryforward.
    I've read thought SAP help, it said I need to do commitment item carryforward.
    But I have no idea, what's the transaction code, what parameter to fill in..
    Kindly guide me or send me related document...please....
    [FM Newbie]

    T code : CJCF - Carry Forward Commitment
    Parameters: - Carrying Forward Commitments
    To carry forward a commitment to the first period of the following fiscal year, proceed as follows:
    Choose Accounting ® Controlling ® Cost Center Accounting ® Year-end closing ® Commitment carried forward.
    Enter the relevant cost center(s).
    Select or deselect the following indicators:
    Test run
    If you select Test run, the system carried forward the commitment, but does not update the results.
    Detail lists
    If you activate Detail list, the system displays the results of the commitment carried forward. The results list shows which values were carried forward.
    You should activate the Detail list together with the Test run. This ensures that you can check the results of the test run.
    Reversal
    The Reversal indicator controls whether data that has already been carried forward should be reversed again or not.
    If you have large amounts of data to process, it is advisable to execute the commitment carry-forward using background processing. This means you can process data at times of minimal system usage.
    Choose Program Execute in background.
    SAP help : - Year-End Closing Reports  
    The reports on year-end closing give you an overview of the closing operations (commitment carryforward and budget carryforward) with fiscal year change.
    The reports display totals records. A comparison of the line items transferred to the new fiscal year with the totals is possible using the program (RFFMCFRC) Year-End Closing Data: Totals Records on Line Items
    Features
    ·        Commitments and budget carried forward (RFFMEP1GX)
    This report displays commitment, budget for commitment and budget for a fiscal year that were carried forward to the following year.
    ·        Commitment carried forward in a test run (RFFMEP2GX)
    This report displays commitment belonging to a fiscal year that was carried forward to the following year in a a test run using the Commitment Carryforward
    ·        Preselected budget (RFFMEP3GX)
    This report displays budget for a fiscal year that was determined for the carryforward into the following year with the program RFFMCF25.

  • FMJ3 - Reverse Carryforward

    Dear experts,
    When executing transaction FMJ3 to reverse commitment carryforwards made from 2014 to 2015 I get the error message “FMCF110 - The document item was reassigned after the commitment carryforward”. I have several documents in the situation, I understand that this documents already suffered changes in the new year and thus have a new account assignment. The problem is that I need to reverse them to the previous year anyway.
    Is there a way to reverse or reset the new account assignment so that it goes back to the previous one? In this way I could reverse the carryforward.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Joana Mensurado

    Hi,
    You have to reassign this commitment to the same FM assignment which was created during carry-forward (FMCB/FMCT). Then, FMJ3 will allow you to process. However, keep in mind that you have already consumed this commitment partially or completely in a new year, then carry-forward won't be available even if you get back the previous assignment.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Carryforward Commitment and consumption.

    Dear Sapgurus,
    We have implemented/Activated Funds Management in current year 2011.
    we are facing following issues :-
    1) we have many Open PO & PR from fiscal Year 2008 and while Carryforward the same with T-code (FMJ2) it update only from 2010 and doesnt show any data of 2008/2009
    2) For Eg. PO Commitement value is $ 1000 of year 2010 and It allows me to carryforward in the year 2011, and in year 2011 i have made GR of $ 300 so balance of 2010 is $ 700  (1000 - 300 = 700), 
    now i need to put control on the system that current year (2011) PO and GR should not consume this $ 700 (as this is for previous year and should allow for year 2010 only)
    Hope to get possitive feedback.
    Regards.
    Tej

    Hi,
    1) if you activated FM after the documents were created, you'll have to reconstruct them in FM (upon requirement)
    2) when you carry-forward PO with a budget, then the budget is already consumed by the remaining commitment and cannot be consumed again, i.e. only G/R (or I/R depending on the settings) will be allowed in terms of budget control. G/R(I/R) will reduce the commitment and increase the actual consumption, but the budget itself will remain totally consumed by the original PO
    Regards,
    Eli

  • PSM-FM Commitment Carryforward

    Dear Experts,
    I have a problem when performing commitment carryforward.
    I am using Funds to represent each quarter of a year, this object is derived in FMDERIVE by posting date.
    When performing commitment carryforward I need to change the fund assigned to the commitments for a new one.
    I'm already using the derivation strategy for reclassification. But, when performing commitment carryforward I get an error message because this strategy is not consistent with FMDERIVE.
    Can you help me solve this problem?
    Thanks in advance.
    Kind regards,
    Joana Mensurado

    Hi,
    "The message is the following:
    Reassignment of account assignment element Fund not possible
    Message no. FMCF108
    Diagnosis
    The Define Account Assignment Derivation is not compatible with the Define Derivation Strategy for Reassignment. The value 0 was determined for document no. 4000000258, the reassignment strategy for account assignment element Fund. However, this was overwritten with value 4 through the account assignment derivation of Funds Management.
    System Response
    The document is not processed.
    Procedure
    Adjust the Account Assignment Derivation of Funds Management or the Define Derivation Strategy for Reassignment in such a way that they are compatible with each other."
    The problem is that I cannot ajudst the account assignment derivation neither the derivation strategy for reassignment. I need that the derivation strategy for reassignment completely substitutes the acc. ***. derivation.
    Thanks!

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I delete Apple ID from my old phone that it is not with me?

    How can I delete Apple ID from my old phone?

  • Problem in more than one Routines in Pricing Procedure

    Hi, I have one pricing procedure. I have created two 971 & 981 routines (CalType) as per my requirements. The issue is that both the routines are not working correctly if they are assigned together is the pricing procedure. But if I assign any one of

  • Problems with servlets and packages

    "im trying to use a package called C:\Acme which includes a GifEncoder C:\Acme\JPM\Encoders the problem is that weblogic 6.1 doesnt seem to find it, this is the error i get in the console           <Dec 8, 2001 2:46:20 PM PST> <Error> <HTTP> <[WebApp

  • Burnt DVD wont start when in DVD player

    Hey, how's it going? When I make a DVD, it wont play.. The disc mounts in all DVD players, title screen and menu screens work fine, but when i click on "Play" nothing happens... When I click on "scene selection" and choose chapter1, the movie plays f

  • Problem with logical or

    hi friends i am using OR in a select statement like this : select single KAWRT from KONV into var2 where KNUMV = var1 and STUNR = 65 or STUNR = 60 . but what i want is that the result for this should be calculated as KNUMV =var1 and (STUNR = 65 or ST