Does DBMS_CHANGE_NOTIFICATION package needs additional cost/charge?

We have a Oracle licence, it would probably a enterprise licence, in such case, does DBMS_CHANGE_NOTIFICATION package needs additional cost/charge?

I don't think you need a separate license for this. You can always check from bellow link if your feature (option) needs to be licensed separately.
http://www.oracle.com/us/products/database/product-editions-066501.html
Salman

Similar Messages

  • Does Symantec Endpoint need additional Malware protection?

    I have been approached by a tech company that helps me monitor our systems and they are telling me that I need to ADD Malware Bytes Subscription to my network.  Symantec says that they already handle malware detection, etc.  BUT this other company is telling me I need additional coverage. 
    My question is: How many layers do we need?  Is it industry standard to have both??
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

    I had some problems with Norton version 10, but none whatsoever with version 11. I've also used VirusBarrier X6.
    VirusBarrier is very configurable but on can give some false warnings if you set it to watch network traffic, monitor for virus-like activities, etc (like it thought Data Rescue was acting suspiciously). VB has warned me about a compromised web page I visited, so that feature works. I've never had a false alert from Norton but  neither has ever found an actual Mac virus so I have no experience with that (NAV has found Windows viruses in attachments, and a Word macro virus).
    If you don't want to configure anything and don't want false alerts use NAV. If you want more configuration options such as monitoring Internet port connections, web threats, etc. and don't mind dismissing an occasional false alarm the VB is a good choice.
    NAV has never slowed anything down. VB usually is transparent but on rare occasion one of the subprograms has run wild (virusbarrierd or virusbarrierb) forcing me to either kill it or restart my computer.

  • Additional cost in invoice

    Hello Experts,
    Greetings,
    My issue is that while creating the invoice through transaction code MIR7,it does not consider the additional cost which was entered in purchase order.
    Please advice what could be the problem or how to do this to get those additional cost in SAP?
    Best Rgds
    Nitin

    Hello Sir,
    Thanks for the reply.It shows the line items for additional cost now in invoice.But while saving the document it asks for "Enter G/L ACCOUNT".Can you please tell me where we have to enter the g/l code?
    One more thing I would like to know is that the additional cost we have entered manually in line items,Will it has to be copied from PO or user has enter it manually always.
    Please do let me know.
    Thanks
    Nitin

  • Use of template using CPT1 for charging an additional cost to the product

    Hello,
    I'm trying to charge an additional cost burden to the cost of my product for every base unit produced. (cost estimate)
    I have created a template using transaction CPT1 with sender as Cost Center / Activity Type in environment 001
    The activity type is measured in EA (Eaches) while we make our product in boxes (Product base unit of measure is 'Boxes') with say 20 Eaches going into a Box
    I have maintained an activity price using transaction KP26 at say $0.55 per Each
    I have assigned this template to my costing sheet , valuation area and overhead key using transaction KTPF
    When I now cost the material for costing lot size of a 1000 boxes, it still charges the product with the activity price per Each ($0.55) instead of multiplying  $0.55*20*1000 = $11,000 for a 1000 boxes
    The formula I have chosen in the template against 'Plan quantity ' is in the attachment enclosed:
    I need help with doing the right thing within the template to make it give a cost burden of $11000 for every 1000 boxes costed (costing lot size)

    Didn't realize that you have to use transaction CPTD to charge template overhead to production orders. That's why it was not working. Now it is posting by reading the confirmed yield. But it is still not converting eaches to boxes using the conversion factor in the material master.
    The formula I'm currently using in the template for actual quantity is as under:
    OrderYieldConfirmed / AltQtyFactorFromMaterial( AlternativeQuantityUnit
    = 'BX', Material = OrderMaterialNumber )
    Please tell me what I need to do to the above formula to make it convert boxes to eaches using conversion factor in the material master?
    A similar formula has worked beautifully for 'cost estimate'
    OrderTotalQuantity / AltQtyFactorFromMaterial( AlternativeQuantityUnit =
    'BX', Material = OrderMaterialNumber )

  • Cinemax is now included with your package at no additional cost!

    Did anyone else get this email - will I save money or will this cost me more money? I assume save? Anyone have more details?
    Dear Customer:
    Good news for customers currently subscribed to the Ultimate FiOS® TV package. Cinemax is now included with your package at no additional cost!
    We will change your current HBO/Cinemax subscription to HBO only. Your account will be credited for the price difference between HBO/Cinemax and HBO from the effective date of the Ultimate Package change. Please note you may not see these reflected on your bill for several months.
    Additionally, if you are currently receiving an HBO/Cinemax promotion, you will continue to enjoy it against your HBO package for the duration of your promotional period.
    No action is needed on your part. We will take care of these changes for you!
    Thank you for choosing Verizon.
    Sincerely,
    Verizon

    I believe it means if you were getting a promotional rate of 1/2 off an HBO/Cinemax package it would continue although you were only getting charged for HBO.   Of course my experience was not as described above.   When I noticed the change on my bill today I called FIOS and learned that Cinemax was now included in my highest tier TV package.  I would only be charged for HBO  - HOWEVER the CSR could not apply a 1/2 discount to HBO.  So now I  pay more for HBO alone then I did for HBO/Cinemax together - $16.99 vs $12.50 (with the credit).   I just canceled HBO today. 

  • What do I need to do to my 5s phone to avoid costly charges while traveling internationally?

    What do I need to do to my 5s phone to avoid costly charges while traveling internationally?

    disable cellular data
    contact your wireless provider for a temporary international calling package.

  • Why does the system need two average costs - 'Average' and 'Average Rates'?

    Hello Gurus!
    The documentation does give definitions for 'Average' and 'Average Rates' cost types, but at a very basic level.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/A60725_05/html/comnls/us/cst/settask.htm
    I would like to know why the system needs two costs? How are they calculated and how are they used?
    Thanks!

    Hello,
    I can suggest you a workaround that will help you keep only the 64-bit version of Photoshop.
    Visit "Uninstall a Program" in Windows 7 Control Panel and uninstall Photoshop completely.
    Visit this page and download trial version of Photoshop.
    Run the installer manually and choose the 64-bit version only (uncheck 32-bit version).
    Launch the product and specify your Adobe ID credentials.
    The product will switch to non-trial (i.e. full) mode when it recognizes your Adobe ID.
    Regards,
    Amit Batra
    Engineering Manager,
    Amit Batra

  • Is bridge a part of the photography package (Photoshop CC and Lightroom)?  Or is there an additional cost?

    Is bridge a part of the photography package (Photoshop CC and Lightroom)?  Or is there an additional cost?

    I've always found Adobe's website remarkably unhelpful on this point.
    It repeatedly promotes the fact that you get Photoshop + Lightroom in a single package - but minimal info on other inclusions.
    The most succinct explanation of all inclusions I can find is at the ever reliable:
    Adobe Gives Ongoing Discount for Photoshop CC + Lightroom Plan | ProDesignTools

  • I have an iPad 32 gb - do I need a special charger for it?  The charger for the newer iPads seems to fit but it does not charge it.

    I have an iPad 3 GB - do I need a special charger for this older model?  The charger for a newer iPad seems to fit, but I do not get any kind of display that it is charging.

    Did you try another cable?
    If you are using a USB to iPad dock connector (older iPads do not use the newer Lightning connector) then
    The Dock connector or the USB cable may be bad.

  • Total Broadband additional usage charges ...

    I'm a loyal BT Phone & Broadband customer (have been for 15 years) and I was somewhat shocked upon receiving my latest quarterly bill to notice that my direct debit payments had been bumped up by quite a bit - closer investigation (of this and the previous bill!) revealed that I've been incurring significant additional broadband charges for at least the last 4 months (as I've exceeded the 10 Gb/month limit on Total Broadband 1).
    I promptly called BT and got upgraded to the Total Broadband 3 package (300 Gb/month limit) and ended up with a cheaper deal all round than I had before!
    This does however leave me about £150 out of pocket and with a slightly bitter taste in my mouth though ...
    Granted, it's my problem for not noticing I'd started going over the 10 Gb/month limit early on [my excuse is that with a very busy life I tend to scan the headline figures on the first page of the bill and only investigate if these seem unusual]
    Nevertheless, I would have expected BT, in the space of the last 6 months, to:
    a) have the courtesy to notify me more proactively that I'm exceeding the "fair usage" policy limits and/or
    b) Move me up to the next level automatically (seeing as it's ended up cheaper anyway?) and/or
    c) Have somebody call me to suggest that I might want to upgrade to save significant costs ...
    Has anybody else had a similar experience ?
    I will add though that I'm very happy with BT's service otherwise - just think this particular point merits raising as a matter of principle!

    Hello alexm3.  Yes, I have had the same problem.  Although I already had a BT landline, I switched in Sep 2010 to a total broadband package Option 1, (at £7.99 p.m.) thinking 10gb was downloads.  Had an email to my normal aol.com account telling me after the first week that I'd used 7gb.  Took 3 weeks to upgrade to Option 2 with 40gb, still went over the usage, and incurred £50 charge, and this month is £20 extra charge, while waiting to upgrade to Option 3.
    I have now been offered Option 3 at £40 p.m. plus line rental of £13.50, plus calls (average £20 p.m.) so look like I am going to be paying over £70 p.m.
    I did also find 22 emails last week in my btinternet.com Inbox although I have indicated I only use my old aol.com email address but they cannot use that although BT have been corresponding with me on that one since day 1 
    Their usage monitor only tells you if you are within or over your usage allowance, not how you've used it!
    Good Luck

  • LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse

    Subject: LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse and not accounting for the year 2008)
    Problem:
    we must add the cost of goods of the raw material (for which was made a check invoice) of the costs, which are arising and charged by different suppliers (transport, freight, insurance, etc. ..). These are already included in FI with fb60.
    The result should be:
    - From the consignment of goods entering, add (only in Warehouse (STOCK), NOT IN ACCOUNTING ') cost accessory
    - Do not change the quantity
    - Having the total cost of stock
    - Exploiting the average cost to FIFO must consider the total cost after additional adjustment
    Example:                                                                                data
    ME21N: purchaise order No. 321 = article 1000kg a price of u20AC / kg 2.30               01/07/2008
    MIGO: goods receipt PO confirms price quantity x (u20AC 23,000) batch 298                      07/07/2008
    MIRO(enter incoming invoice): Check invoice OK per (u20AC 23,000) batch 298           07/08/2008
    Invoices received for costs Accessories:                                                                08/08/2008
    FB60: transportation bill on all'purchaise order above cost u20AC / 0.11 kg
    0.11 * 1000kg = 110 recorded in cost and accounting of stock.
    In accounting, the cost has been reported, in warehouse I need to reverse (add) u20AC / kg to 0.11 initial cost of u20AC / 2.30 kg without adjustments in general accounting, but only in warehouse value and not in the quantity.
    So in the end I should have:
    batch n° 298 -  kg  1000 at a cost of u20AC 2.41 (2.30 +0.11) for the year 2008. How should I do?
    thanks

    Thomas,
    I presume that your client has activated 'Revenue Recognition' component in SAP.
    If your client has already activated the RR component, they may be aware that the activation is unreversible.
    Recognition of costs in a deferred revenue scenario requires some customization effort but definitely do-able. It is not falling within standard SAP.
    I worked on scope of one such project but it did not happen unfortunately.
    Can you please post your regular updates in this forum?
    All the best.
    Thanks
    PS: I am not an employee of SAP AG and by answering questions, I am not getting any monetary benefits anywhere. I am answering questions here in my spare time for recognition and the points awarded, which gives me a sense of self-satisfaction. Awarding points is also a way of saying thanks and it will encourage me to answer more questions and share my knowledge and experience

  • Additive costs

    Hi friends,
    We have an issue related to Additive Cost. some costs which have been put live in the system since go-live have used additive costs to deliver the fixed ohd into the product cost instead of the purchase order condition type and
    when conducting a cost roll up (CK40N), we were finding that we were getting 2 lots of additive cost because we have loaded new additive cost values from 1st may but we think the reason is that the we have loaded additive costs via the upload (CK74)  but they are also pulling from the purchase order condition type so we are getting two lots of cost.
    So we think the fix is that purchasing must update their condition types and we realised that the additive costs shouldn't have been loaded and we have deleted the additive costs because they never should have been loaded.
    So advise me do we need to stop to upload or any other way to stop two times cost values.
    Raju

    Freight cost is added on to the basic standard cost of materials, which is fine. Basic cost of materials comes from regular cost estimate and the freight from additive. Now when a purchase order is raised, the vendor needs to be given a purchase order only for the basic price and not the freight. The material could be brought by own transport or the vendor charging separately for freight.
    That being the assumption, the purchase order is loaded with a accrual type condition type for freight, which shall customized to create an accrual entry upon purchase. This could be meaningful to reduce/avoid the unwanted effect of distorted purchase price variance.

  • Loading of additional costs on to inventory

    Hi All,
    How do load additional costs (freight, insurance, import taxes etc) on to inventory. The invoices for the above services will be received only in the month end. By this time raw material might have been already received and the basic invoice (commercial invoice) already booked. Additional cost that I book in the month end should pro rata increase the inventory values of the received lots so that my contribution figures are accurate.
    How do I do this? Any document available?
    thanks

    You need the Periodic Costing, this is addressed in the Cost Management User Guide, There is also a Good white paper in Metalink in the Top Tech Doc under Cost Management section. This white paper explains with examples how to use this type of costing and how to integrate all the additional charges into your ost.

  • Reg:Additive Cost

    Hi,
    For Standard Cost Estimate i want to post freight expenses through additive cost for wat is the Item category we need to take for that
    and wat the parameters we need to select

    Hi Brahmankar,
    while posting the T.Code:CK74N I had given Item category is "P" (Process Manual)
    The throuing following Issue
    Business process  does not exist
    Message no. KW002
    Diagnosis
    Business process  is not created in controlling area 1100.
    If you want to process a business process or use it as a reference, this business process must be available in the system.
    System Response
    No further processing is carried out.
    Procedure
    Create the business process in -> master data or correct your entry.

  • Additive Cost Estimate Report

    Hi Gurus ,
    We need a additive cost estimate Report that would show the Material,Plant, additive cost (in dollars NOT "x" as shown in KEKO or KEPH table).
    for the above I tried a simple Querry with MARC-KEKO-KEPH (didn't conside MBEW-MARA) , in SQ01 But the end resul is same as KEKO table Just Showing the "x" mark,
    Users can not go for individual validation after doing a Mass upload of CK76N using LSMW  so would like to see a detailed report with Dollar amount and comare it with their Books.
    I searched SDN for this kind of report But no useful information,
    Your Help Greately Appreciated,
    Note: please don't say Use, KEKO, KEPH tables,Thank you ,
    Sandhya

    You can look at Functional Modules in SE37. You can as well execute them in test in the tcode to provide the input values, it would show the out put values as well.
    You need to provide your requirements by explaining what you are achieving in CK76n and how they are stored in Tables KEKO, etc... and ask him to build a program using the above functional modules.
    Infact if the above functional modules doesnot work, you can ask the ABAPer to use the same function modules used in CK76n to get the information and make the requirement changes to meet your requirements.
    Edited by: Suraj Ramamurthy on Dec 9, 2008 2:33 PM

Maybe you are looking for