Double sided VPC- adding one more pair

I have 2 pair of 5k connected in double side vpc configuration. can i connect one more pair of 5k to the existing domain ?

Hi,
I don't see any issue with double sides vPC between two pairs of 5Ks. I think, the reason you don't see it often is because usually you have a set of 5ks with vPC as layer-2 and a set of 7Ks as layer-2/3. Of course you could use a second set of 5Ks in place of 7Ks and use them as layer-2/3. This is with daughter cards installed on 5Ks.
HTH

Similar Messages

Strange bug -- adding one more button OR page causes Form warning to appear

I'm building a simple interactive document in InDesign CS4 on the Mac, to be exported/delivered as a PDF. There are a few text-based buttons on the Master Page that are set to Go To a Text Anchor on Release. There are 4 buttons of these buttons on the page, and each one leads to a different page in the document, and they all work fine. They are all built the same way.
I want to export a PDF that opens cleanly in Reader, meaning no unexpected dialog boxes or warning messages appear. Up until this point, my document opens cleanly in Reader.
However, when I create a FIFTH button (using the exact same method used to create the other buttons), OR I add ANY more pages to my document (which currently stands at 16 pages, but will need to ultimately be upwards of 40), for some reason, opening the PDF in Reader causes Reader to start displaying the large, distracting pink warning message at the top of the page:
"Please fill out the following form. You cannot save data typed into this form. Please print your completed form if you would like a copy for your records."
The fifth button I create (from scratch) causes this message to appear.
Or, if I add another page (using my Master Page, where the buttons are used), this message appears. Even if the fifth button is not created, and I add another page from the Master, this message appears.
If I add a blank new page (without using the Master Page), the message does NOT appear.
So, for some reason, adding ONE more button, or referring to the Master Page in the document ONE more time by adding a 17th (or more) pages, seems to kick InDesign/Acrobat Reader into thinking my document is suddenly a form, and causes Reader to display that obnoxious pink message when opening the document.
I've tried several troubleshooting steps.
- I've ensured my buttons have unique names.
- I've tried creating the fifth button from scratch, and also tried creating it from duplicating one of the existing "good" buttons.
- I've made sure the button has a destination page/Text Anchor to go to.
- I've opened the PDF in Acrobat Pro 9, and gone through all of the page and buttons in the Forms Manager, and there is nothing out of the ordinary in that view.
Why is Reader suddenly thinking my document is a form (that "cannot be edited/saved") when I add one more button, or one more page!? It's bizarre, and quite frustrating.
Thanks for any insights,
Robbie

You can use that same workaround with ID CS4 files. You just have to make the PDF and then go into Acrobat to add the security that doesn't allow editing (Acrobat -> Security -> Encrypt with Password) . That gets rid of the warning about the form. Of course if you actually have a form somewhere in your document, you won't be able to use that......

Adding one more participant to approve the task in workflows

Hi All,
I'm having a requirement of adding the adding one more workflow user for approving the task. How to add one more workflow user in the human and allow him to approve the task which has been already approved by another workflow user, means it is hierarchical approval.
First the task has been approved by assignee then finally the task has been approved by the approver who has admin rights.
Regards,
CH

Hi,
I have added the users but i need to approve the same task for twice then it is propagating the data to the other end. Is there any hierarchy that we have to
define for the user inside human task.
Everytime I'm approving the request for twice. How to approve the request for only one time.
Regards,
CH

Double-sided vpc Nexus7K and NExus 5K

I have two 5548UP connected to two Nexus 7k forming double sided vPC design. The 5k is acting as access layer top of the rack and 7k as aggregate. The 7k is configured with vrf contexts and vlans with vrrp.
I followed the best practices for double-sided vpc described in this document
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/design/vpc_design/vpc_best_practices_design_guide.pdf
I'm using the same port-channel-id and vpc-id in all 4 devices. I also have different vpc domain-ids for the N5K (domain-id:20) and N7K (domain-id:10)
All physical connectivity has been verified. I have 16-ports port-channels (8 ports on each peer)
I have also verified all vpc status: show vpc, show vpc consistency-parameters global, and everything looks good int both N5K and N7K: keepalive is alive, peer adjacency formed ok, all consistency status are success, etc
I have also checked port-channel configurations and each individual interface member of the port-channel
The problem I have is the port-channel in the N7K is no coming up and I just can't figure out why. I've checked all I can think of, and tried different things and the only way I can bring the port-channel up is if I shutdown all interfaces in the N5K connecting to the N7K except those between 5K-1 and 7K1 (primary devices) and remove the "vpc 31" command under port-channel 31
In the Nexus5K, things looks good, this is what I see when I check the status of the vpc
vPC status
id     Port        Status Consistency Reason                     Active vlans
31     Po31        up     success     success                    14-16,24,28
                                                                 -31
However, in the N7K this is what I get. There are not consistency errors, but still the status of the port-channel is down.
vPC status
id   Port      Status Consistency Reason                  Active vlans
31   Po31      down   success     success                    -
sh int po31
port-channel31 is down (inactive)
admin state is up
vPC Status: Up, vPC number: 31
Any ideas what could be wrong? has anyone experienced similar issue?
Any suggestions are welcome.

Could you provide a quick diagram and the output of 'show port-channel summary' on both switches.

Double sided VPC/enhanced VPC and MST

Hello,
I have some doubts/clarifications regarding MST with VPC--
There are two N7K core switches and four N5K switches and eight N2K.
there will be double sided VPC between N5K and N7K.
there will be enhanced vpn between N5k and n2k.
N7Ks will be connected to fifteen 4500.
Each 4500 will be in a VPC with N7k.
Each 4500 is single homed to 15 catalyst edge switches
Assume MST needs be configured in this network.
1) On MST instance - on N7K as per cisco design guide
2) Map all vlans (1-3967,4048-4093) in this instance N7K as per cisco design guide
3) No need to hard code root as peer switch command will be used
Now the concern that i have is regarding MSt configuration on all 4500.
1) 4500 number 1 may have vlans 2,3,4,5,6,7 and 4500 number 2 may have vlans 2,11,12,13,14,15,16
so can i just map all vlans to the single instance like instance 1 vlan 1-4094 on all catalysts 4500?
2) catalyst edge switches all run PVST+, i believe 4500 mst will interoperate with edge switch pvst+.
Is there any othe things that need tobe taken care of in this scenario?
Regards

1) If you are using MST with single region, I don't see the point. It can be done with RPVST+ without any interop worries.
2) Same as 1.
3) This is not true, with peer-switch feature, it is a BP to hard code the N7K as STP root with the same priority value, otherwise, the smallest switch ID will be the root. In you case, most likely the oldest switch will become the root if you don't hard code it.
To your second set of questions:
1) Yes, you need to match all your region(s) with the same VLANs, otherwise, you will have MST inconsistency.
2) Yes.
HTH,
jerry

Adding one more tab in apex 4.0??

Hi All,
In my home page, i already have a Tab thats having four different name.When i click on that name its navigating to four diffrent page
I want to add one more tab below the existing Tab,The new tab should contains these there values Home,Report1,REPORT2 when I click Report1 it should navigate to page 3 and similarly for remaining names.
I tried to create a new tab set as well as new tab..but that’s getting added in the same Tab. I have changed the Page template as Two level Tabs also but then also not getting resolved , do I have to set any properties?
Thanks & Regards,
Ramya.

Ramya,
In the next line exactly below the first tab i want these values should be added as a Tab(Project1,Project2,Project3,Project4)Should be at Tab Level 1
In the next line exactly below the first tab i want these values should be added as a Tab(Project1,Project2,Project3,Project4)Should be at Tab Level 2
In the Next line right below the Project4 i want to Display these two values(Project 4 interface ,Project4 Report) as two sub tabs at the third level .Can be a List
Jeff

Adding one more selection field in the standard data source

Hi SAP Gurus,
I'd like to know how to add one field as a selection field for the data source.I used 0FI_GL_4 Datasource .It has 2 selection.Now I want to add one more field as a selection field .How to mark that field as selection?I tried by using RSA6 ,But I'm unable to change the previous selection.
Please let me know how to fix it?
I'll assign the points ...
Thanks & regards
Raja

Pradip,
when ever you create any Generic DS, you can find generic DS(I checked this), comming append fields(it's happend to me)... there is no meaning.. as we know... we will extract the data for append fields using existing DS.
Comming Raju:
to my knowledge, you should not add that field as selection enabled(wait for others posts). I had seen many posts for working on this... by updating the Table ROOSFIELD table for the respective DS. I never implemented this... if you update this using any custom program be careful. Ihave ccreated the program for append fields not for Standard Extractor.
Try to search any SAP Notes: 571985
All the best.
Regards,
Nagesh Ganisetti.

Adding one more field to the VL06O report

Hi everybody
When u execute the TR code VL06O a screen will appear from that screen select list outbound deliveries and then provide some date and execute.
The output will come having fields delivery,ship-to-party,name of ship-to-party like that 7 fields are there and now i want to see one more field called shipment number in the output along with the previuos 7 fields.
what should i do it is a standard program?
please guide me?

Hello.
See note 128150 to more details.
There are user exists to add new fields (user fields).
Regards.

Adding one more ECC to Duet Enterprise landscape

Hi Experts,
i have a Duet Enterprise landscape configured where i have one SCL system and one ECC system. As of now, Reporting and Workflow scenarios are configured on the ECC system.
Now i would like to add another ECC (say ECC_2) system into the landscape where i can work with Starter Services.
Please clarify following doubts regarding the same.
1. Can i add this ECC_2 using installation wizard using just "Connect to SAP system" step or do i need to run all the steps in the installation wizard?
2. While running this step, do i need to specify 1 in the textbox or 2 (which indicates number of SAP systems). If i specify 1 and go ahead with the ECC_2 details, will it over-write the configurations done earlier for ECC ??
3. Is it possible to change the source system for "Reporting" / "Workflow" after the installation ? (i mean later as per my preference)
~ Ramanath.

Hi,
yes, adding a second system is no problem. That is actually one of the great "features" of Duet Enterprise: you can easily connect multiple system and expose (even aggregated) data to SharePoint.
1. Can i add this ECC_2 using installation wizard using just "Connect to SAP system" step or do i need to run all the steps in the installation wizard?
Yes, you can do that. Just de-select all but the "Connect to SAP System". When executing this step, the required RFC destinations (both on the SCL and the backend system) will be created, as well as required trusts will be established (e.g. exchange PSE certificates for Web Service Trust / SAP Logon Ticket and Trusted System connections for RFC based communication)
2. While running this step, do i need to specify 1 in the textbox or 2 (which indicates number of SAP systems). If i specify 1 and go ahead with the ECC_2 details, will it over-write the configurations done earlier for ECC ??
Leave the 1 in the textbox. This is just a number of how many system you want to connect.
3. Is it possible to change the source system for "Reporting" / "Workflow" after the installation ? (i mean later as per my preference)
Yes, that is also possible. If you take a look at the IMG (SIMGH -> Service Consumption Layer Administration -> General Settings -> Manage Business Object Groups) that's where the "applications" are stored. These Business Object Groups represent the different applications that you see and use in SharePoint. So for example you see the Business Object Group "SPI_WORKFLOW" (if you used the default BC set configuration) which contains the Business Object "IW_WF_TASK".
Now if you take a look at the "Assign SAP System Aliases" (just select "SPI_WORKFLOW" and double click on "Assign SAP System Aliases") you can see to which server this Business Object Group / scenario is assigned. If the "User Role" is empty this means that all users on the SCL are assigned to this system. Via this table you could assign different roles to different backend system.
This "System Alias" is -- as the name says -- just an alias for the real RFC destination that points to your backend system. If you want to see what backend system this is, you have to go to SIMGH -> Service Consumption Layer Administration -> Connection Settings -> SCL to SAP System -> Manage SAP System Aliases here you can see which System Alias points to which RFC destination.
So in your case -- if you want to switch the backend systems -- you can either change the RFC destination that is assigned to a system alias here, or you create a new system alias (with the RFC destination that points to your new backend system) and assign this System alias to the Business Object Group.
I know it might sound confusing the first time you do it, but it all makes sense and is pretty logic if you get used to it.
Regards,
Holger.

Macbook pro seems not to be shut down normally after adding one more user account

after i have created a new user account and i tried to shut it down, it does not appear a white background on the screen to let me know if the pc was in the process. After few second the screen becomes black and it shuts down.
I tried to turn on the pc and it works normally but when i shuts my pc down, the same problem appears.
I have already delected one user account but the problem still appears.
I am not sure is it ok or not?
i am a new user to apple product.

I experienced the same problem. What I noticed that problem seems to occur more often when bluetooth is switched on. For instance, today I wanted to switch off bluetooth connectivity before switching off laptop completely. The bluetooth icon in menu bar from some strange reason froze completely, rest of programs and OS were working fine. When I wanted to switch off the laptop it happened again, it froze and the only way to switch it off was to hold power button.

Adding one more system in existing stms landscape

Hi Gurus,
I am trying to add one sandbox system to my present landscape
configure TMS for four systems, out of which two systems (DEV1 and DEV2) are with same SID (DEV). As recommended by SAP, I understand that there can not be two systems with same SID in a transport domain.
and also my domain controller is DEV system,
please suggest how can i add DEV sand box in this landscape
Regards

Hi,
Yes, you can do that. Once cofiles and data files are generated after transport request is released in Quality system, you can import them into Sandbox system by manually adding them into import buffer.
If Sandbox system does not have common /usr/sap/trans, you have to manually copy those cofiles and data files from Quality to Sandbox /usr/sap/trans/cofiles and .../data and add the request to import buffer of Sandbox system from either STMS or OS level using tp addtobuffer command.
Please make sure STMS is configured in Sandbox system as local domain before you perform above said steps.
Hope it helps. Please let me know if you need any further info.
Thanks,
Siva Kumar
Edited by: Siva Kumar Arivinti on Nov 5, 2011 1:55 PM

Adding one more field to the Base line price screen (MEk3)?

Hi,
Now we are entering the base line price for each material.
My requirement is
1) Ability to enter in baseline prices by part by supplier.
If no supplier is entered then the baseline value applies to all suppliers. If a price needs to be recorded specific to a supplier, then the supplier code must be entered. Thus, a part may have two entries (one for all suppliers, and one or more for each unique supplier that needs to be recorded).
How to proceed for this requirement..how to start ...please help me..is this config change or code change..or it is related to custom or standrard change?
please help..

Hello,
You can define access sequence (SPRO->Materials Management->Purchasing->Conditions->Define Price Determination Process) for the condition type to look at Vendor/Material level and Material level in the sequence. Please make the access Exclusive so that no further search is carried out once a condition record for Vendor/Material level is found.
Thanks,
Venu

Adding one more enqueue process to ECC 5.0

hi,
we are running with ECC 5.0 talking to CRM 4.0 & BW ,many times it has been observed that lakhs of queues(inbound) remain stuck due to non availability of the enqueue process at ECC ,after checking the same at ECC it was for a long in "running" state ideally a enq process should be in running state only for few milli secs
so its only after its restart we can proceed i know its possible to incraese the enqueue Work process as finally we have only one lock table , but i need to kow the process on how to add this work process & what cautionary thin gs to be taken care while adding an enqueue work process.
Regards
SM

Daer Jaun
thanks for your prompt reply
I would like if you could help me on the documents if any for getting an additional enqueue work process & associated configurations,however i do analyse the system on regular basis & since this concern is being faced at a customer's place it was their observance on the enq process being occupied for a longer period.
Regards
SM

Double sided printing, adding blank page after two different groups

Post Author: adepper
CA Forum: General
I have created a report that is structured as such:
Group 1 - Based on formula, groups by type
Group 2 - Based on formula, groups by use
Group 3 - use (pulled directly from Database)
Group 4 - ID
I have the report printing an extra page after group 3. I used this formula in the Section Expert - New Page After
remainder(pagenumber,2)=0
I also use that formula to reset the page number
What I would like to do is print a second blank page if group 2 does not start on the top of the page, meaning I do not want either group 3 or group 2 to start on the back of a page, so that this report can be placed in a binder, with dividers.
I have group 3 giving me a blank page with no issues, it is just group 2.
Any help and/or suggestions would be appreciated. If I did not give enough details, I am sorry.
Thanks!

Post Author: adepper
CA Forum: General
After a lot of blood, sweat and tears, not to mention a lot of curse words directed at the computer, I was able to get this to work. Now I just have to do it for three groupings instead of two (deliver the impossible to your bosses, and they turn around and move the brass ring right out of reach again!)
In case anyone is interested in how I was able to manage this (I found many sites where people asked this question, but not one complete answer), this is what I did:
In the footer section:
Group 4 - ID (database field)
Group 3 - PrimeUse (database field)
    3a - Contains data
    3b - Contains data
    3c - New Page After, Keep Together, and Reset Page Number After are all checked. In the condition for Reset Page Number After I also have this formula:
    remainder(pagenumber,2)=0
    3d - New Page After, Keep Together, and Reset Page Number After are all checked. In the condition for New Page After I have this formula:
    remainder(pagenumber,2)=0
Group 2 - Suppressed
Group 1 - Grouped by Store Type -
    1a - Suppressed, New Page After and Keep Together are all checked.
    1b - New Page After and Keep Together are checked. In the condition for New Page After I have to following formula:
    remainder(totalpagecount,2)=1
If anyone sees any errors, or if you think you can get it so that I get another page blank, after Group 1, if the Group starts on an even numbered page, I would appreciate the help.
Thanks!

N7k - Domain ID for double-sided vPC topology

I´m planning the configuration for 2 N7k using the following network diagram:

Hello Clark, thanks but this is not my case, I have 2 N7k, with 2 VDC on each, so I'll create a vPC from Core Switches and another vPC from Aggregation Switches, and my question is for vPC domain ID for each vPC configured.
What I had found till now, it's that it has to be different vPC domain ID.

Double sided VPC- adding one more pair

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for