Downpayment should only be created with downpayment request

Hello Experts
I have requirement that F-48 (Downpayment to Vendors) should only allow payment using downpayment request.
As of now our users have authorization for F-48. So he forgets to post downpayment using downpayment request. He creates downpayment directly without request. I want to restrict this direct downpayment.
Please help me, how can I restrict F-48 without downpayment.
Meena

Hi Meena,
Check with your basis team for the tab "New Item" in F-48 for not visible or restrict it by authorization.
Regards,
Mukthar

Similar Messages

"This document was created with an unsupported version of Excel. Only documents created with Excel '97 or later can be opened.

I keep getting this message when I try to open an Excel file "This document was created with an unsupported version of Excel. Only documents created with Excel ’97 or later can be opened.

You could try opening the Excel document with LibreOffice and then resaving it in a compatible version before opening in Numbers.
Jerry

Transportation Related DO - should only be procssed with shpmnt doc created

I have 2 types of sales order.
1) one sales order "ZDIR-direct sales" does not requires transportation (Shipment document) thus the process related to it is sales orde - > Delivery order -> PGI -> invoice
2) other Order type is "ZTRN - Transportation related" for which the process flow will be SO - > DO - > Shipment Document - > PGI -> Invoice
Now how can i control that all the sales through ZTRN order type should only be processed via shipment documnet. right now when in ZTRN sales mode, user can click on PGI in its DO and thus can invoice...Thus the shipment document is bypassed and pgi is directly carried out in DO.
Inshort, is there any control in starndard system that transportation related DO cannot be processed without shipment document.
Hope my query is clear
Thanks in advance.

Hi
SAP enhancement V56L0001 (use transaction SMOD to use this user exit)
The system calls this user exit in function module:
=> SD_DELIVERY_SHIPMENT_STATUS.
You can use the source code in this function module as a template.
regards,
Ramana

New session created with every request

Hi there,
I have an web application that we used to deploy on tomcat, websphere and bea without any trouble. We are trying to move to support OAS and the application gives this peculiar behavior:
A new session is created with every single request by the client browser. I have searched these forums for the better part of today and read some interesting similar cases but none of the fixes seem to have any effect on my problem.
Is there a different way I need to request the session object from the request in the app for OAS? Or is there a configuration that I should have? I am deploying the app as a .war file. Is there a better way to deploy on OAS, should I stick the war in a .ear?
Any help on this would be most greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
-Adam

I have a problem that matches with this subject line but its somewhat different. This original posting wants to create new session and invalidate the existing one but my problem is to keep the session invalide if it has expired for the browser.
Anyways, here is my problem. I have JSP named entity_actions.jsp which has 3 pop-up links that opens up with code like:
window.open('restaurantentry.do?entityName=restaurant')
window.open('districtentry.do?entityName=district')
window.open('baseentry.do?entityName=base')
My web.xml has this tag:
<session-config>
<session-timeout>5</session-timeout>
</session-config>
And the way forward the response for each request is:
context.getRequestDispatcher(urlString).forward(request, response);
The code I check for session timeout is:
private void checkForSessionTimeOut(HttpServletRequest request)
throws SessionTimeoutException
HttpSession current_session = request.getSession(false);
logger.info(CLASS_OBJECT, "Session in checkForSessionTimeOut(): "+current_session);
if (current_session == null)
logger.error(CLASS_OBJECT, "SessionTimeOutException has thrown.");
throw new SessionTimeoutException("sessionTimeOut");
Now lets say I want to show the end user session expiry page after 5 mins of idle time. Now from entity_actions.jsp when I click/open any one popup first time after 5 mins of idle time/session expire,
logger.info(CLASS_OBJECT, "Session in checkForSessionTimeOut(): "+current_session);
this loggers shows current_session as 'null' and I can display session exp mesg on the popup page. But when I click/open any other popup or any other link on the page it DOES WORK instead of having current_session = null, it creates new one. And I can see the sessionid which is different than fist session created on the same base page/browser.
The same pattern of code used to work on Tomcat and JRun before for showing consistant session expiry on all the clicks being made on the same browswer after session gets expire.
Why OC4J / JDev 10.1.3 is creating new session on the same browser even after session has expired?
How can I fix this?
Thanks

Bitmap pattern has seam ONLY when created with "Object → Pattern → Make"

I think I've encountered a bug with Adobe Illustrator CC 2014.
I'm trying to make a repeatable pattern out of a bitmap, which I downloaded from http://subtlepatterns.com
Most of the patterns I try, work correctly, but one in particular behaves strangely.
(This is the png in question: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/473648/pw_maze_black.png, Here is an example AI file that shows the problem: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/473648/Pattern%20Seam%20Example.ai)
When I create a pattern with the "Object → Pattern → Make" menu item and then apply it to a shape, I get hairline seams that appear in the pattern at various zoom levels. If I export the file with "Save for Web" to a PNG then the seam disappears, though if I use the plain "Export" feature to create a PNG the seams appear in the output file.
The strange thing is when I create a pattern from the above PNG by dragging it to the Pattern palette and use that pattern, the seams do not appear in any export files, or in the design window of AI.
Other patterns I've tried from subtlepatterns.com work correctly when created with the "Object → Pattern → Make" menu item.
Obviously I have a solution to this problem, but is there an explanation for the difference between creating the patterns with the two methods, or is it a bug?
Thanks,
Caleb Land

When dragging the pattern to the swatches panel works, just do it. You don't need the pattern editing mode for this one.

Foreign trade--Billing document should not be created with missing data

Hi,
We have foreign trade set up. In that we defined incompletion schema at line item level with commodity code and country of origin as "Field ready for input - Incompletion check active".
Can anybody tell me that, in the above setup, is it possible to avoid the creation of billing document with missing above data.
Generally , system will go for the accounting status for block with foreign trade data missing. But our users don't want to create the billing document if the data is missing.
Can any body suggest us.
Rajesh.

Hi Rajesh
You have to set up a new subroutine or you have to copy the standard subroutine and include the logic that it should read the foreign trade details at both sales order and delivery levels.you need to assign the subroutine in both VTFL and VTFA copy controls (header and item levels)
Another option is you have to go with user exit RV60AFZZ.Please refer this link,hope it should solve your problem
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1361141&tstart=3735
Regards
Srinath

Create with reference where original document is incomplete

Hi Guys
We use variant configuration as part of our sales order process. Within the VC we have 'discontinued' validation i.e. a component of the configuration may be discontinued and therefore unavailable. In this case, we would want to lock the configuration, reject the order item and create a new order item for a different component. We do not wish to delete the order item because of the effect this has on BI sales reporting.
However, if we later wish to create another document (such as a FOC replacement) with reference to this document we receive an error message to the effect that the document being referenced is incomplete and cannot be used as a reference.
Does anyone know of a way of being able to copy complete items only during create with reference or being able to set the status of an incomplete ('being processed') item to complete.

"Incomplete" and "being processed" are two different things. If document is "incomplete", there are some fields that are required and must be filled in before the document may be processed any further. As correctly pointed out above, such fields will appear in the incompletion log.
There is no way to work around the incompletion procedure. If you need to make the field required only in certain situations, you might want to take it out of the incompletion procedure and add a user exit instead.
If an order is displayed as "being processed", this means that one of the statuses (see Status tab on header and item level) is "partially processed". Normally setting the rejection reason updates the overall item's status (not to be confused with the header's status) to "complete", but I've heard of some cases when for some reason this does not happen. Unfortunately, I don't recall if there was any solution.
Hope this helps.

Clear DownPayment with DP request if DP is paid from Cash Journal

Dear all,
Normally, we create downpayment request in F-37. After that, post down payment which refer to request in F-29, and DP request is automatically cleared.
But If customer pay downpayment by cash, how to clear DP request ?
Thank you,
Kindly regards,
Sylvecat.

Hi Sylvecat.,
I am also looking for the same Answer..
I have made down payment request and then made payment by FBCJ.
Is there any option to clear the request with Payment in FBCJ ??
Or How u resolved this issue..
Shinas

How to create a transport request with query and only with its structure.

HI guru,
how to create a transport request with query and only with its structure.transport request should not include any other query items like ( variables, conditions...etc)
thanks in advance.
venkata

Hi,
Goto RSA1 and then Transport Connection -> In SAP Transports select Object Types-> Query Elements -> Then select Query->Give Technical name of the query and then select for transfer. In the right side you can choose the components which you wanted to transport.
Regards,
anil

User should only work on created Form

Hi all!
Here is my problem.
A user is working in B1. For example:With a double_klick on a Textfield and a user created Form will be shown.
No the User should only work with this Form until its closed! There should be no possibility to open an other form or so.
Like if you get a MessageBox, there is no other "normal" way to work on until you close this Messagebox.
May it is possible to let the Form act like such a Messagebox.
Thanks for replies..
Matthias

The Sample you speak of show the hack/workaround (Not true modal functionality).
From the sample:
    Private Sub SBO_Application_ItemEvent(ByVal FormUID As String, ByRef pVal As SAPbouiCOM.ItemEvent, ByRef BubbleEvent As Boolean) Handles SBO_Application.ItemEvent
        ' Don't let the user to move to other forms
        Dim EventEnum As SAPbouiCOM.BoEventTypes
        EventEnum = pVal.EventType
        If bModal And FormUID <> "Modal" Then
            oForm.Select() ' Select the modal form
            BubbleEvent = False
        End If
        ' If the modal from is closed...
        If FormUID = "Modal" And (EventEnum = SAPbouiCOM.BoEventTypes.et_FORM_CLOSE) And bModal Then
            bModal = False
        End If
    End Sub
In the sample the bModal bool set to true when opening the form block all events by selecting the modal form on each event and setting bubbleevent to false.. the EventEnum = SAPbouiCOM.BoEventTypes.et_FORM_CLOSE set the bModal to false so events can continue
Biggest problem with this is if you use a eventfilter (which you should do)... here you need to remove the event filter along with setting the BModal (not in the sample), and reapply it after form close.
<i>Kind Regards
Rasmus Wulff Jensen | http://www.b1up.net</i>

Downpayment should not be more than PO Value

Dear All
Down payment against purchase order
Downpayment should not be more than PO Value
here i want control material wise taht mean some of the material shouble be allow the exces payment and some of the material should not be allow the exces amount. againt purchase order
Regards
Navap

Hi,
For your you need to write Validation in OB28 and take help of your ABAPEr, the logic will be:
1. Create Set through GS01Table MARAField MATNR
2. Pre-Requisite
    BKPF-BLART = 'Down payment Document"
   Check
    Give Exit Name such as UF101 and in this exit you can ask your ABAper to write code that
if Material on PO is in Set (created in Step 1) and Advance Amount > PO Amount then post DP
Message
Give your own message number
Hope this helps!
Br,Vivek

Delivery should not create with out company code data

Hi all,
We have created a customer master without company code data with T code VD01 and subsequently created sales order and delivery with PGI and invoice also saved but no accounting document is getting generated. But we want to stop at delivery only; system should not allow creating delivery. Please do the needful
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Nagesh

hi nagesh,.
from standard SAP it might not be possible.
but check this work around:
after creating the COMPANY CODE DATA by the marketing people only you please go ahead and create a delivery till that time the sales order will be in open status.
if you want to stop it through the SAP system:
then you need to contact TECHNICAL PERSON on the same:
MV45AFZZ : USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE for checking while creating a delivery if not created then to throw an ERROR message - this is the only probability to check
but he may not be having solution for your query.
except the work around.
please check and confirm
balajia

Issue with creating new change request

Hi
We have implemented charm and we are using the workcenters for people to be able to access and create new change requests. When i click on the link to create a new change request it takes me to the screen to create a new one and it shows a New Change Request Number eg 51. With out saving or entering anything I go out and back to the workcenter and then click to creat a new change request and when it takes me back in to create a new change request it shows a new change request number i.e 52. Why would it do this?
Santosh

Hi,
wel by default a transaction is autosaved..so u hav diff no each time you logged into this.
Go to spro and choose your transaction type i.e. SDCR for change request and double click it
and now remove the Tick from
Early No. assignement
This wil solve your problem so whenver it opn no appears by default only whn u press save it generates a no.
Pls assign pts.

Restrict this transaction code only to create sets starting with 'ZMR'

Hello,
I need to create custom transaction code for 'GS01' and restrict this transaction code only to create sets starting with 'ZMR' No other sets should be allowed to be created.
If anyone have done before with the same scenario. Please give me clear documentation on this .
Reagdrs
Kiran

YOu cannot find the call to the badi's by searching the main program.
The badi is called a t run time.
To find a badi attached to a main program, goto se38,
GIve the program name.
Goto->Object Directory Entry. Find the package.
Go to se18 transaction, Press f4.
give the package name in the popup.
you can get the badis associated with the main program.
Regards,
Ravi

Configuring ISR Scenario SRK1 (Create Cost Center Request) with Adobe forms

Hello,
I am trying to configure the ISR scenario SRK1 (Create Cost Center Request) with Adobe Interactive Forms.
However when I am trying to generate the form, it is giving an error TR015(Object can only be created in SAP package)
Apparently by default it tries to create form Adobe form ISR_FORM_SRK1.
Even if I change that name to ZISR_FORM_SRK1, it tries to create interface ISR_IF_SRK1 which is in SAP's namespace and I cannot generate the form. I cannot seem to be able to force SAP to use a different Interface name. The field for the interface is greyed out and is not picked up
Am I missing any step or is there any fix to this problem?
regards,
Atul Kulkarni

Hi,
From the config it picks the formscenario(SRK1) and prefixes the same for adobe form.
I think the best option would be to copy the Stnadard form scenario to ZSRK1 and proceed. This copy can be done from the config 'Manage Form Scenarios' under this select the option 'Copy form scenario'. This copies the entire config from SRK1 to ZSRK1.
Regards
Srikanth KV

Downpayment should only be created with downpayment request

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for