End user spam notifications

We have stand-alone EOP with on-prem Exchange. We have not created any user accounts in Office 365 yet (we are getting around to it later). Will end users receive spam notifications when a message goes to the quarantine if they do not have a user account
in Office 365 yet?

We had this happen for several of our customers as well. Ended up speaking with a Microsoft technician who wasn't able to provide me with a way to roll back the changes, but I was able to use the following steps to get content filter settings back to how
they were:
- Navigate to Exchange Admin Center > Compliance Management > Auditing
- Click "Run the admin audit log report"
- Run the audit dating back to when EOP was initially configured
- Find the entry matching the cmdlet of "Set-HostedContentFilterPolicy"
- Select and note the parameters for this entry
- Now, navigate to Protection > Content Filter and manually reconfigure the settings matching the parameters of the audit.
Unfortunately, I was unable to find a way to easily roll-back these settings or use the parameters in PowerShell. It's possible, but the commands would have to be retyped for each item and it would take more time than simply reconfiguring the settings.

Similar Messages

End User SPAM Quarantine checkbox to select all messages not working

We are running SPAM Quarantine on M670 running 8.1.0-476 and accessing with Internet Explorer 9.0. After logging into the SPAM Quarantine there is a top row check box that normally we can check to select all messages. This stopped working in IE for us, any idea what setting/option we could adjust to enable it again?
In Chrome 29, FireFox 23 it works as expected.
Jason

I think this is a know bug in 8.0, see below:
CSCuj42166
Selecting all messages in ISQ at once not possible with IE 8.0/7.0/6.0
Symptom:
When accessing the spam quarantine on ESA using IE 8.0/7.0/6.0 and trying to select all messages at once, an error occurs and no message is checked. At the bottom of the browser we see an "Error on page"
Conditions:
ESA running 8.0.0-671 and Internet Explorer 8.0 (same valid for 6.0 and 7.0)
Workaround:
Using a different browser to access the Centralized Spam Quarantine like for example Safari, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Internet Explorer 9
Further Problem Description:
Details
Known Affected Releases: (2)
8.0.0(Venetian)-671 | 8.5.0(FourQueens)-0
Known Fixed Releases: 0
Release Pending
Product: Cisco Email Security Appliance

Customise EOP Spam Notification End-User email address and email content

Hi
We are using EOP with our on-premise Exchange 2010 environment.
I am rolling out EOP and have the following two (simple) questions, regarding the Spam Notification email that is sent to end-users:
1. Can we edit the email address that sends the Quarantine notification email? Or must the email come from [email protected]?
2. Can we customise the Quarantine email that is sent to the End-user (with our company logo)?
From my experience and understanding, I believe the answer for both is NO, but my customer is adamant that editing the email address and customising the email content is possible.. Please advise.
Thanks
Ron

The safelist/blocklist is tied to one email address. However, if you enable email alias consolidation done by LDAP and leveraging off of the Active Directory, then you may be able to achieve what you want.
The safelist/blocklist comes into play with respect to anti-spam results. The email alias consolidation should occur much earlier.
So, see if you can get email alias consolidation using LDAP/Active Directory working and it should address the safelist/blocklist thing.

Push Notifications to end users and Conditional Success Screen Name ?

Hi,
Scenario: PO Approval
Description: I am developing a PO approval application with 3 levels of approval. The HWC application is based on the push notification ( DCN with payload ). When a PO ( Purchase Order ) is created/modified the end user will get the notification. Once the first 2 levels of approval is done from the mobile devices the notification should reach the 3rd level for approval. And Conditional Based Users only View there Profiles, If an User1 Approved PO Approval then only User2 Will get Push Notification but for User3 it will not Visible, Oncethe User2 Approved then Only User3 will get Push Notifications and these 3 Profiles have to be log in Based on Condition Name & Conditional Success Screen Name.
Question: How to set to which user the notification should reach. In the "to" field of JSON when I am providing "supAdmin" means the notification will reach all the devices who has the application. Once a PO is created the notification should reach only to user in the first level. Once he approves the PO, then only it should reach to the user in the 2nd level. And finally 3rd level.
Here Conditional Name is the best way to Log In or is there any other way to show the User based Log in Details, Because Here I am showing a List of Items Based On Log In, and Based On Log In user Has to view there List of Products and Status.
How to manage this situation.
Midhun VP can you please help me on this.
Thanks,
Vamsi K

Yes, DNS is is fundamental for networks, even for Windows networks. The DNS is working well for the existing Windows network and there are no problems in distributing certificates etc.
There are more than 150 users and 180 devices on the network without DNS problems.
I don't know how to discover a DNS problem... Windows works well.
DNS resolves fine... dig does it for "a" records and "ptr" records. nslookup resolves, too.
When the problem is a faulty DNS, why does the usage of users/devices from OD work with Profile Manager?
Renaming and/or migrating the ActiveDirectory is not possible. First, I want to be sure that there is a faulty DNS.
The .local TLD is not optimal for Bonjour/mDNS but I can't believe that there is no workaround

End-user notification is not working for one of the untagorized HTTPS webistes on IronPort WSA

When users try to access the URL https://cloud.skytap.com/tools/connectivity they are getting 'Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage' instead of regular IronPort WSA end-user-notification. This URL is currently uncategorized. Please advice.

Yes, we have set drop all the uncategorized URLs. We do get end-user-notifications for HTTP websites which are uncategorized.
However, if any of the HTTPS websites which are uncategorized, then we wont get end-user-notification.

Email notification to end-user only when both resources are provisioned

Hello Gurus,
My client has a requirement where the end-user needs to be sent an email notification as soon as his account gets created in OID and EBS.
So the next time when the user logs in; he should be able to access both his accounts. But the email should be sent only when the 2 accounts are succesfully created.
How can we do that by means of process tasks and adapters?
Can anybody give an idea about how can we provide this functionality in the best way OOTB or custom way (code snippet) ?
Thanks,
- JHB.

Hi
If you are using OOTB connectors for OID and EBS then this requirement can be achieved by using OIM API.
On successful response of 'Create user' in OID or EBS call a custom adapter and check for the provisioned status of other RO i.e. on completion of Create User task of OID, check for prov status of EBS and send the mail accordingly.
If the user is not provisioned to the other resource, then do not send the mail. Otherwise if the user is already provisioned to the other resource, send the mail to the user. This approach is based on the assumption that there is no link between the provisioning to OID and provisioning to EBS.
Correct me if I missed something.
Hope this helps.

Set up end user notification for updates/comments

Hi,
SCSM 2012 R2
I've set up a workflow to notify end users when an incident has been created. Users can submit cases by mail, get a receipt, and can reply to the incident.
Now, i'd like to set up a workflow to notify end users when a comment has been made in their incident aswell.
How can i do this?

Hi,
That would do the job, however i have not found a way to enter the affected users name in the mail template when using "Trouble Ticket Analyst Comments".
Btw, installed the Cireson notify free app. I can see no info on the cireson site about how to use it. Checked the incident workflows, nothing new there. Checked the notifications templates, nothing new there. Checked the forms templates, nothing new there.
Spendt about 40 mins googl'ing the subject and found no info.

Websecurity and End-user-notification with HTTPS proxy

Hi all
I would like to setup HTTPS-proxy functionality in a deployment. Most of the rules are "pass-through" and only a few would then be configured for drop or decryption.
But if i set the connection to drop it is not possible to display an End-user-notification for the endusers. Is there any chance to display an End-user notification to the enduser while dropping or denying https access to a particular group ?
If yes, is the End-user notification then displayed in normal http connection or in a https connection ?
Did i use for that a trusted certificate to correctly display the end-user notification without to pop-up a certificate failure (because self-signed certificate is in place at the moment) ?
It would be great, if you have some answers for some of those questions.

Andrew,
See if the below may be modified to do what you want.
barbee.
Cisco Ironport Advanced Services
     * This function checks for the category and redirects the user.
     * -- 2010 june 16. barbee.
    function checkForRedirect() {
        var category = document.getElementById("category");
        if ( category.value == "Search Engines" ) {
            window.location = 'http://www.ironport.com';
OTHER STUFF

Notification to End Users after Data Loads

Hi Everyone,
We are currently working on the development of a solution to nofity our end user community following load processing in BW. Specifically, at the time an infoprovider is ready for reporting we are trying to send a notification out based upon the time and availability of data.
We are working on something more robust than just email sent from process chains or a third party scheduler, but something more dynamic that will say what time data was loaded and what data is available...
Has anyone worked with this and if so, can you share your thoughts/perspectives on the solution you implemented?
Thank you very much.
Cheers, Craig

I did something similar for a kind of protocolling of process chains. Write an ABAP with a couple of parameters you need like Status (Ok/Error), Process Chain, Email to notify, message class and number etc.
At the end of every process chain you can attach one AND- and one OR-process. The AND-Process is triggered if all final steps of the process chain are finished green, the OR-Process is triggered if at least one process is finished red. Now create one 'Ok'-Variant and one 'Error'-variant for each of your process chains and attach these variants to the AND- and OR-Process.
Inside the ABAP you can do any kind of ABAP-protocolling, sending emails, triggering events etc.
Best regards
Dirk

Single Edition Q - Folio update and end user notification

Just after some clarity - after my initial publication, the app being on someones iPad, if I want to update say, an events page within the app (I know a URL link is probably best but not always practical), I understand that I have to resubmit (and pay the single edition fee) the new, updated app to the app store, does the app that has already been downloaded receive an update notification? I mean, does the app receive a red dot to say it has been updated and will the update appear in the app updates list in app store.
Would like to know what the end user actually sees or receeives to let them know the app is updated.
TIA

No. Just saying it would be way easier to create a new app.
I’ve seen funky stuff like this with test apps. Do you have an iPad that hasn’t had this on it that you can test it on?

Administrator's notifications to end users.

Hello,
we do not have portal, but would like to know is there any simple solution to include admin's notifications to end users on the page of the transaction bbpglobal.
I would like to have it on the left side of the page, under the long descriptions of the transactions.
TIA
Gordan

Hello Gordan,
With transaction SM02, you can define system messages. They can appear in first screen after logon if you define it the logon configuration of service bbpstart.
IIs that what you are looking for ?
Rgds,
Pierre

HTML in spam notification

Hello,
I'm trying to modify the spam notification by adding some html.
I went to this menu : Monitor > Quanratines > Spam > Edit
The message format is "HTML"
When i put html, the html is not interpreted.
Any issue to this problem ?
Thanks
Jonathan

Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for the clarification.
Please refer to the link below and search for "Configuring Spam Notifications"
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/esa/esa7.5/ESA_7.5_Daily_Management_Guide.pdf
You will see on step 5:
"Customize the message body. AsyncOS supports several message variables that, when placed in the message body, are expanded to the actual value for the specific end user. For example, %username% is expanded to the actual user’s name when the notification is generated for that user."
I hope this helps,
Luis Silva
"If you need PDI (Planning, Design, Implement) assistance feel free to reach"
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/tools/pdihd.html

In search of end user based forums

in search of end user based forums
Any one know of SAP website for (expert) end user Q/A ?
Development is fun and all, but when I need A break from the 011001101000100110100 where do I go?

Interesting question.
You could try the forum or even [Scripting Languages|/community [original link is broken]; here on SDN to get closer to the front end, but I guess the "expert level" would need to be quite advanced before an end user spends more than just a careless mouse-click there.
Otherwise there is the [SAP Design Guild|http://www.sapdesignguild.org] which has a lot of interesting things about the UI. However they closed their forums because of spam, and now point to . Downside: Not much action going on. Upside: You could become top contributor and will a free entry to SDN Community Day with just one post.
Another option worth taking a look through is the [BPX category|/community [original link is broken]; where you might find some .ppt programmers hanging out.
Cheers,
Julius

End user releasing own emails based on Policy/Content

Hiya all,
New to this forum and my first post so hello to all
We recently installed a couple of C360 and an M series and they all are working well.
We have also setup Profanity based filtering and as a result many swear words are being rejected.
This is setup using dictionaries.
But we are also getting a high number of false positives and as a result our Techsupport team is inundated with requests to release emails.
I know with SPAM Quarantine there is End-User Quarantine Access but I don’t see this with Policy Quarantine.
The end result I want is for end users to release their own emails blocked based on profanity.
Is this possible?
My apologies if this has been asked in the past.
Ivan.
:D :D

Welcome aboard Ivan!
The main reason there is a separation between ironport spam quarantine(isq) and policy quarantine(aka system quarantine) is that ISQ is mainly used in conjunction with the anti-spam verdict/results. While policy quarantine is used as a result of administrative/company policy(e.g. like a profanity dictionary filter in your case).
Another difference between the two is ISQ is accessible by the end user. Policy quarantine is accessibly only by the admin of the machine.
Here is a KB article that goes over their diffs.
What is the difference between IronPort Spam Quarantine and System Quarantine?
http://tinyurl.com/233qkq
Now, there is a way to tweak it so that the content filter sends it over to the ISQ. Now keep in mind by doing this, you're mixing profanity filter verdicts with anti-spam results. It may be confusing for the end user unless you preprend the profanity stuff with "[Contains profanity]" at the beginning of the subject line.
This Cisco IronPort support portal KB article goes over how to send content filter results over to the ISQ.
Can a Content Filter divert messages to the IronPort Spam Quarantine?
http://tinyurl.com/coebj3
Good luck and let me know if that doesn't address your concern.

SWIA Authorization to end users

One of the user executing PM Notification Work item is experiencing SWIA authorization problem in SU53.
Please suggest if the user should be given access to SWIA as its an administration tool

I'd rather not.
Of course you need somebody to monitor workflows ... but that should either be your Basis-team (that's what many companies do) or the SAP functional responsible for the process to which the workflow is attached (personally, I prefer that). This is not an end-user transaction in my opinion - but as opinions go, there might be various others. To grant such an authorisation to an end-user would call for an excellent knowledge of the process which one does not automatically exspect in a (typical) end-user.
Just my 3 cents ...

End user spam notifications

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for