Error in PO creation from SRM 7.01  to ECC 6.0

Hi Gurus,
Please throw some light on my isssue.
We are developing Plan Driven Procurement Business Scenario in SRM.
Current System details are ECC 6.0 EHP4, PI 7.1 & SRM 7.01.
We have done all the configuration settings in ECC, PI & SRM.
PR created in ECC 6.0 and External source of Supply tab generated in PR, processed through SAP PI successfully to SRM 7.01 and sent confirmation back to ECC.  We are using ABAP Proxies and standard content for this PDP Scenario.
1) Using PurchaseRequestERPSourcingRequest_Out as an outbound interface and PurchaseRequestERPSourcingRequest_In as Inbound interface.
2) SRM we are using PurchaseRequestERPSourcingConfirmation_Out as an Outbound Interface and PurchaseRequestERPSourcingConfirmation_In as an Inbound interface in ECC.
3) Using PurchaseOrderERPRequest_Out_V1 as an Outbound interface and PurchaseOrderERPRequest_In_V1 as Inbound interface.
We are facing problem while getting confirmation back to SRM 7.01 from ECC as the interface is not getting triggered in ECC.
We are using
4) Using PurchaseOrderERPConfirmation_Out as an Outbound interface and PurchaseOrderERPConfirmation_In as an Inbound interface.
Please provide inputs to resolve the issue.
Ashok

Hi Imran,
It is compatible, But still for confirmation please see the product availability matrix.
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/support/pam/pam.html?smpsrv=https%3A%2F%2Fwebsmp203.sap-ag.de#pvnr=01200615320900003495&ts=4&pt=t%7Co
Best regards,
Rohit

Similar Messages

  • Transfer of Pricing Conditions from SRM 5.0 to ECC (Extended Classic)

    Hi All,
    I am currently doing an enhancement on a copy of function module B46B_DPO_TRANSFER and the implementation of BBP_DRIVER_DETERMINE BAdI that will call the copied FM to transfer the pricing conditions from SRM 5.0 to ECC since in standard only net price is being transferred to ECC.
    During the creation of PO, everything is ok. All conditions are transferred to ECC.
    But we are encountering problems in the replication from SRM to ECC when changes are done in the PO during deleting or inserting a condition to an item. Our problem is in figuring out what will trigger us to use Change types U, I, E, D in populating the CHANGE_ID field in POCOND table that will be used in BBP_PO_INBOUND function module.
    During creation of PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I' on all conditions to be transferred.
    When there are modifications on a PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'U' and I am encountering problem when new conditions are inserted to an item since it will not be displayed (which I believe in this case, POCOND-CHANGE_ID should be 'I'), and when deleting a condition to an item.
    I would like to ask, if there is an indicator that a condition will be inserted to an item for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I', and for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'D' when a condition will be deleted.
    By the way, I used FM BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL (exporting: E_PRIDOC) to get the PO conditions to be transferred and have checked E_PRIDOC-DEL_IND to check if a condition will be deleted. Unfortunately, it is not working on the deletion since it seems that DEL_IND field is not being populated if a condition will be deleted.
    Many thanks,
    Kezia
    Edited by: Kezia Layug on Mar 3, 2009 4:24 PM

    Hi All,
    I am currently doing an enhancement on a copy of function module B46B_DPO_TRANSFER and the implementation of BBP_DRIVER_DETERMINE BAdI that will call the copied FM to transfer the pricing conditions from SRM 5.0 to ECC since in standard only net price is being transferred to ECC.
    During the creation of PO, everything is ok. All conditions are transferred to ECC.
    But we are encountering problems in the replication from SRM to ECC when changes are done in the PO during deleting or inserting a condition to an item. Our problem is in figuring out what will trigger us to use Change types U, I, E, D in populating the CHANGE_ID field in POCOND table that will be used in BBP_PO_INBOUND function module.
    During creation of PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I' on all conditions to be transferred.
    When there are modifications on a PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'U' and I am encountering problem when new conditions are inserted to an item since it will not be displayed (which I believe in this case, POCOND-CHANGE_ID should be 'I'), and when deleting a condition to an item.
    I would like to ask, if there is an indicator that a condition will be inserted to an item for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I', and for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'D' when a condition will be deleted.
    By the way, I used FM BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL (exporting: E_PRIDOC) to get the PO conditions to be transferred and have checked E_PRIDOC-DEL_IND to check if a condition will be deleted. Unfortunately, it is not working on the deletion since it seems that DEL_IND field is not being populated if a condition will be deleted.
    Many thanks,
    Kezia
    Edited by: Kezia Layug on Mar 3, 2009 4:24 PM

  • Request for PO attachment replication from SRM 4.0 to ECC 5.0 in Extended C

    Hi All,
    I want to replicate the Purchase Order Item Level attachment from SRM 4.0 to ECC 5.0 in Extended Classic Scenario.
    Please let me know the procedure for the same like related BADIs in SRM and ECC.
    Could you please send any documents related to Document Manage System to my gmail id sudarsan.srm ?
    Best Regards,
    Sudarsan

    Hi All,
    I did the following Steps to replicate PO Attachments from SRM 4.0 to ECC 5.0 in Extended Classic Scenario as per OSS Note 1057932:
    Step 1: I activated BAdI BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK~Fill_PO_INTERFACE in SRM System and added the following Code
    CV_ATTACH_TRANSFER_ACTIVE = 'X'
    CV_ATTACH_BE_STORAGE_CAT = 'DMS_C1_ST'
    CV_ATTACH_BE_DOC_TYPE = 'SRM'.
    Step 2: I created Doc Type SRM in ECC5.o with the help of DC10 Tr Code.
    Step 3: I maintained Data Carrier Type PC entry with the help of DC20 Tr Code in ECC 5.0 and default ebtries for Front End Computer Details. (I crsoss checked Storage Category DMS_C1_ST in ECC5.0, it is available).
    Step 4: I maintained all the details (document Types) for PC Carrier Type with the help of DC30 as per OSS Note.
    Then I tested the PO attachment replication scenario. I could not find the attachment in ECC5.0 in PO (ECC5.) which available in SRM PO (SRM 4.0)
    Kindly guide me or suggest me is there any additional settings required to transfer PO attachment from SRM to ECC5.0
    Thanks a lot in adavance.
    Thanks,
    Koyya

  • PO Header Text Replication from SRM 4.0 to ECC 5.0

    Hi All,
    I am trying to replicate PO Header Text from SRM 4.0 to ECC 5.0 with Extended Classic Scenario.
    Process of PO Header Text Entering in SRM PO:
    1. We create PO from Sourcing.
    2. We go to Processing POs and then we enter under Header Data -> Documents -> Internal note.
    I added code in BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI (method: BBP_MAP_BEFORE_BAPI) related to header text mapping. I think this BAdI will not be triggered while processing PO from SRM.
    Please let me know the procedure or sugeestions to replicate header text from SRM 4.0 to ECC 5.0.
    Thanks,
    Sudarsan

    Hi
    1042516 - SAP Note
    Re: Vendor/Internal note text for Confirmation of PO in SRM
    Internal note can be passed to R/3 PO. It is standard. check it up.
    Internal note must copy to another follow on document but why it is not copying in to your backend PO.
    You can try oss notes .. I will update you if i find any notes
    Regards
    Muthu

  • Attachments at header level from SRM BI/BID  to ECC PO

    Hello All,
    Our landscape is SRM 5.0sp09 & backend ECC 6.0.
    SRM tech scenario - CLASSIC
    SRM business scenario - Sourcing with Bid Invitation
    We have set up DMS in ECC and are now able to transfer item level attachments from SRM BI and BID to ECC follow-on PO.
    Our customer desires header level attachments since they want to avoid DMS maintainance.
    We have checked this with sap OSS and the responce was---
    <b>this is a limitation/desired behavior. SRM is not
    passing the attachments as the same cannot be viewed at header level in
    PO(as indicated by you). Hence only the item level attachments are
    passed. I am not sure if the same is taken care in SRM 6.0.</b>
    Our customer is still insisting for header level attachments.
    Can anybody give relevant inputs?
    BR
    Dinesh

    Hi Dinesh,
    I am not sure about the exact technical details of the same. But i just know that SRM50 will not support this functionality. Sorry that i am not able to help you in this regard
    Hope we will get some other reply here....
    Thanks & Best Regards
    Raj

  • Missing Workflow XAML Feature Error during site creation from custom template Microsoft.Workflow.Client.ActivityNotFoundException

    Hi,
    I am using SharePoint 2013 Enterprise with the March CU.
    I created a project site template with libraries, lists and workflows and saved it as a template with content.  When I try to create a new site using this template, I get the error pasted at the bottom.
    I was using SharePoint designer workflow custom activities created in VS2012. I uninstalled those and decided to call a web service directly from SharePoint designer.  The workflows work fine inside of the site which I want to create a project template
    from.  When creating a new site from the template, SharePoint complains about a missing workflow XAML feature.
    Do I have some leftover references to the custom features? Does anyone know how to resolve this issue?
    <nativehr>0x8107058a</nativehr><nativestack></nativestack>Microsoft.Workflow.Client.ActivityNotFoundException: The activity named 'WorkflowXaml_13602d27_d83f_48bb_b73b_54ef9df29a0e' from scope '/SharePoint/default/cbb1afbb-8112-47b3-82b1-6e1f47923d9a/20857512-9689-4361-a887-04644d740b1c'
    was not found. HTTP headers received from the server - ActivityId: 22e889a4-6edb-4b0b-8e09-9bb04483b991. NodeId: SERVERNAME. Scope: /SharePoint/default/cbb1afbb-8112-47b3-82b1-6e1f47923d9a/20857512-9689-4361-a887-04644d740b1c. Client ActivityId : 69e6449c-9c3c-f090-404f 
      Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. 
     Exception Details: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: <nativehr>0x8107058a</nativehr><nativestack></nativestack>Microsoft.Workflow.Client.ActivityNotFoundException: The activity named 'WorkflowXaml_13602d27_d83f_48bb_b73b_54ef9df29a0e'
    from scope '/SharePoint/default/cbb1afbb-8112-47b3-82b1-6e1f47923d9a/20857512-9689-4361-a887-04644d740b1c' was not found. HTTP headers received from the server - ActivityId: 22e889a4-6edb-4b0b-8e09-9bb04483b991. NodeId: SERVERNAME Scope: /SharePoint/default/cbb1afbb-8112-47b3-82b1-6e1f47923d9a/20857512-9689-4361-a887-04644d740b1c.
    Client ActivityId : 69e6449c-9c3c-f090-404f
    Source Error: 
     An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.  
    Stack Trace: 
    [COMException (0x8107058a): <nativehr>0x8107058a</nativehr><nativestack></nativestack>Microsoft.Workflow.Client.ActivityNotFoundException: The activity named 'WorkflowXaml_13602d27_d83f_48bb_b73b_54ef9df29a0e' from scope '/SharePoint/default/cbb1afbb-8112-47b3-82b1-6e1f47923d9a/20857512-9689-4361-a887-04644d740b1c'
    was not found. HTTP headers received from the server - ActivityId: 22e889a4-6edb-4b0b-8e09-9bb04483b991. NodeId: SERVERNAME. Scope: /SharePoint/default/cbb1afbb-8112-47b3-82b1-6e1f47923d9a/20857512-9689-4361-a887-04644d740b1c. Client ActivityId : 69e6449c-9c3c-f090-404f]
       Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.ApplyWebTemplate(String bstrUrl, String bstrWebTemplateContent, Int32 fWebTemplateContentFromSubweb, Int32 fDeleteGlobalListsWithWebTemplateContent, Int32 fIgnoreMissingFeatures, String& bstrWebTemplate,
    Int32& plWebTemplateId) +0
       Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.ApplyWebTemplate(String bstrUrl, String bstrWebTemplateContent, Int32 fWebTemplateContentFromSubweb, Int32 fDeleteGlobalListsWithWebTemplateContent, Int32 fIgnoreMissingFeatures, String& bstrWebTemplate,
    Int32& plWebTemplateId) +293
    [SPException: Microsoft.Workflow.Client.ActivityNotFoundException: The activity named 'WorkflowXaml_13602d27_d83f_48bb_b73b_54ef9df29a0e' from scope '/SharePoint/default/cbb1afbb-8112-47b3-82b1-6e1f47923d9a/20857512-9689-4361-a887-04644d740b1c' was not found.
    HTTP headers received from the server - ActivityId: 22e889a4-6edb-4b0b-8e09-9bb04483b991. NodeId: SERVERNAME. Scope: /SharePoint/default/cbb1afbb-8112-47b3-82b1-6e1f47923d9a/20857512-9689-4361-a887-04644d740b1c. Client ActivityId : 69e6449c-9c3c-f090-404f]
       Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx) +146
       Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.ApplyWebTemplate(String bstrUrl, String bstrWebTemplateContent, Int32 fWebTemplateContentFromSubweb, Int32 fDeleteGlobalListsWithWebTemplateContent, Int32 fIgnoreMissingFeatures, String& bstrWebTemplate,
    Int32& plWebTemplateId) +889
       Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.ProvisionWebTemplate(SPWebTemplate webTemplate, String webTemplateToUse, SPFeatureWebTemplate featureWebTemplate, Page page, SPFeatureDependencyErrorBehavior featureDependencyErrorBehavior, ICollection`1& featureDependencyErrors)
    +928
       Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.ApplyWebTemplate(SPWebTemplate webTemplate, Page page, SPFeatureDependencyErrorBehavior featureDependencyErrorBehavior, ICollection`1& featureDependencyErrors) +532
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.TemplatePickerUtil.ApplyWebTemplateAndRedirect(SPWeb Web, String strWebTemplate, Nullable`1 bSharedNav, Boolean bOnTopNav, Boolean bOnQuickLaunch, Page page, Boolean bDeleteOnError, SPFeatureDependencyErrorBehavior
    featureDependencyErrorBehavior, ICollection`1& featureDependencyErrors) +2076
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.NewSubwebPage.BtnCreateSubweb_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e) +861
       System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +146
       System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +3586
    Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.0.30319.18045  

    Hi  Jerry Choinski,
    For your error, It could possibly have something to do with that the workflow did not publish before saving your project site as a template.
    The "Elements.xml" file, which is packaged within the "wsp" solution file contains 2 "<File" elements. One file element represents the XAML file, and the other
    represents the WF association file. If the WSPublishState value for each "<File" element differ (one has a value of "3" and the other a value of "1"), the error will occur. For solving your problem, please update the WSPublishState value for both "<File"
    elements to “3”.
    PropertyName="WSPublishState"
    Value="3"
    Also note that the WSPublishState property is also duplicated within the "MetaInfo" property, so both occurrences should be updated. Then the resulting files need
    to be re-packaged into the template.
    Reference :
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-us/be41f1c5-1dfb-4869-9a52-1c93902bfd91/microsoftworkflowclientactivitynotfoundexception-when-deploying-solution-with-workflow
    Please inform me freely if you have any questions.
    Thanks

  • Error during PO creation from contract

    Hi all,
    my requirement is to change the Handling type field of that purchase order that is referred from contract using the BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST and Method PROCESS_ITEM. but i am getting an error message " Data from Business Add-In ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST not transferred successfully " . but when we are pressing ENTER this error was by passed.
    This error is occuring only when i am trying to change the Handling type field.
    This error does not occur when i am changing the Track number.
    Note: i am trying to create a PO that is referred to a contract.
    Thanks.

    Hi Santosh,
    362 is not maintained for BASB,but its maintained for condition type JMO1(IN:A/P BED Deductable) & JMO2(IN: A/P BED non deduct )in <b>AltCTy</b> field.
    And For BASB 605 is maintained in the field AltCBV.
    Can you Pls explain the significance of this alternative calculation type.
    Regds

  • SUT Error at TO Creation from Non-SU to SU managed Storage type

    Hi
    I am creating TO to move quants from Non-SU Manged Storage type to SU managed Storage type, but at first its giving error saying Enter SUT for storage type.  These Non-SU managed Storage types are not having SUT Check but SU Managed storage type is having SUT Check.
    I tried to update WM view-2 with SUT and palletization but still issue exists.
    I am having batch job for RLAUTA10 where TR is converted to TO but due to above issue , this batch job is getting failed.
    I am deseperately trying to find the root cause and fix this asap.  Let me know how this issue can be resolved??
    Thanks

    Like I mentioned earlier in my posts, SU's are typically not managed in interim storage types. Apparently, in this case, the PSA is an SU managed location and you are trying to move inventory from a non-SU ST to SU PSA ST. The isse that you are encountering is due to the reason that the palletization data maintained in the material master is defaulted during receipts rather than staging therefore, the SUT field in the TR remains blank. But, due to business reasons you are using SU's in PSA's then you'd have to venture into development options to include SU types during automatic converion of staging TRs into TOs.

  • Getting error in project creation from Appropriation Request

    Hi SAPians,
    When I am creating a project from appropriation request having same coding mask option(Option 1 in AR type), the project structure is not created as desired. Like I am copying a project from template I-00001 with WBS I-00001 at first level. But when I am creating project in AR by copying this std.  project , created project definition is I-00001 and level 1 WBS is I-00001-01. Because of this project entire project structure has changed.
    can anybody help me this new created project structure as desired.
    Thanks & Regards
    Ramsha

    Hi,
    we also faces the same issue since replace optionis not there on IMA11, what we did was, we  created only 1 st level wbs through IMA11 and then inluded the rest using CJ20N using template.
    Regards,
    SL

  • Deleted service entry sheet from SRM not posted in ECC

    Experts,
    SRM 5.0 (Ext classic)
    We have a limit PO for 1000GBP. User created a service entry sheet for 880GBP and this was posted in ECC. Then user deleted this entry sheet after which I see 'Error in process' status. RZ20 status shows "Error whilst creating an entry sheet in the backend system. Entry sheet XXX already deleted". Also Service entry sheet in ECC has status 'deleted'.
    How come SES in ECC has status deleted but in SRM it shows error in process?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Christian,
    Thanks for your reply.
    But this is what has happened. No the SES was not deleted in ECC before the confirmation was deleted in SRM. Our users don't have access to ECC T-codes.
    Also I have checked the time at which the cancellation was created and everything is in sync.
    How can i change the status of SES from 'Error in process' to 'posted in backend'?
    Please advise
    Thanks

  • Baseline date not getting populated from SRM invoices posted to ECC 6.0

    Hi,
    We are currently in ECC 6.0. The SRM system is in 4.0. We have this particular problem that the baseline date is not getting populated from the Invoices posted from the SRM. The baseline date is blank and the document is saved.
    Did anyone face the same problem??? Can you please refer SAP note 541934 and expand........
    Thanks
    Aravind
    Edited by: Aitipamula Aravind on Aug 10, 2009 5:13 AM

    Hello,
    Yes, you could check the attached note 541934 and regard the implementation of the field ZFBDT in the invoicing document.
    Note 541934 provides a solution how to achieve the MM-customizing for payment baseline dates getting effective for invoices with SRM-origin. This note needs to be applied at your ERP-MM-side in the former plug-in-layer. As described in the note, this is a modification. It's recommended to apply in non-productive system first.
    Hope the above infor.are helps for you!
    Best Regards,
    Gladys xing

  • Problems during material replication from SRM 5.0 to ECC 6.0

    Hello all,
    I tried to replicate material master from ECC to SRM but i am not successful.
    System can able to replicate all the product categories but not the material.
    System showing the process is done and it is showing green light when i drilldown.
    Can any one ever had experienced such a problem?
    Thank you
    mahesh

    Hi
    <b><u>Please go through this -></u></b>
    <b>Note 884208 - Unusable Middleware objects are provided</b>
    <b>Note 872533 - FAQ - Middleware</b>
    <u>As mentioned in SAP OSS note 872533, DNL_CUST_BASIS3 is obsolete, therefore, Please skip the download of the object DNL_CUST_BASIS3 and continue with DNL_CUST_PROD0, DNL_CUST_PROD1 and MATERIAL.</u>
    Following OSS note 872533, DNL_CUST_BASIS3 is obsolete.(Though OSS note mention DNL_CUST BASIS3 is obsolete for SRM 5.0, However, this customizing object does help in synchronizing the UOM from R/3 to SRM.)
    However, it seems to still work in SRM50...
    <u>Related link -></u>
    Re: UNIT OF MEASAUREMENT
    As an alternative :
    For ISO codes synchronisation, you can go to transaction CUNI -> ISO and then select "utilities" -> "adjustment".
    A pop-up will be displayed to select the backend code
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • PO:Error in Process while transferring to backend (ECC 6.0) from SRM 5.0

    Hi folks,
    We are on an Extended Classic Scenario. We have a major problem occurring in Production system only for the the limit orders. Limit Orders are not getting transferred to ECC 6.0 from SRM (Error in Process clearly shows the non existence for PO created first time)
    I also know that Error in Process/ Transfer Failed status comes up for several causes.
    This was working fine for months together, suddenly this problem is coming up. 1 Week back we had a Patch Upgrade too. I have checked the Vendor data, Account Assignment and other Basic data too and everything looks fine. We have tried debugging the FM's on SRM side which transfers the PO(ex:BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC_V2)
    After debugging too we are not able to rectify from where the error is coming up..
    I need your valuable inputs on this.
    Thanks a lot in advance.

    Thanks a lot on your Key inputs Peter.
    I just forgot to mention one more thing, i.e., in RZ20 (SRM) we could see the following errors for limit orders:
    (01) PurchOrder 003....012: Transfer failed
    (02) PurchOrder 003....012: Please maintain services or limits
    (03) PurchOrder 003....012: Purchase order still contains faulty items
    (04) PO 003....012: No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference
    To trace the issue backwards we tried creating a limit order PO directly from ECC backend (ME21N Transaction)
    One thing we could observe is in Limit tab if we not specify Expected Value and Overall Limit we are encountering the same error as shown up in RZ20.
    This gave us a vague idea that the price is not getting transferred for Limit Orders from SRM 5.0 to ECC 6.0 backend. Any key inputs on specific FM etc.,to debug and see what value is getting transferred from SRM to ECC would come handy.
    I hope Peter and others will help me on this.

  • How to transfer Vendor from SRM  to SAP R/3

    Hi...
    How to transfer Vendor registered in directly via self regstration in SRM to SAP r/3 system
    regds
    Kumar

    Hello Kumar,
    Please find the SAP documentation:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/b2/a298403de08368e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    I have not tested the functionality but as per documentation Under Business Partner Monitor transaction, you can synchronize SRM vendors with ECC vendors directly using a pushbutton Transfer Change to Backend.
    Other useful threads.
    Tranfer vendor data from SRM to ERP (R3 / ECC)
    Vendor data transfer from SRM to R/3.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Ashutosh

  • Vendor data transfer from SRM to R/3.

    Hi,
    I create a Business partner in SRM, I need to transfer it to R/3 ????
    Pls advice how to transfer the same.
    regds
    pavan.

    Hi,
    Pls see the foll thread for solution/workarounds:
    Re: Self registered Bidders to be transferred to ECC
    Other related threads:
    Tranfer vendor data from SRM to ERP (R3 / ECC)
    Vendor replication from  SRM to R/3?
    External Vendor replication from SRM to R/3
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=571462&messageID=1487382
    Replication of Vendor master from SRM to backend.
    BR,
    Disha.

Maybe you are looking for