Error in servcie work order Settlement
We have tried to process the Settlement for FCOs Service Work Orders and Warranty Contracts but we get the following error message
"Account 6810100 requires an assignment to a CO object".
I have detected that this GL account has been created as cost element from January 2010, but as far I know the GL accounts that belong to settlement process must not be created as cost element.
Now pls help how to resolve this problem
Rgd
Prakash Sharma
Hi
You are right ..
I checked cost element 6810100 user made following change ,
In cost element master from 01.01.2010 to 31.12.9999 .- Cost element category is- 1 Primary costs/cost-reducing revenues and earlier from 01.01.2000 to 31.12.2002 Cost element category is- 22 External settlement and also in default account assignment cost center is not assigned.
I just want to know error is coming because default account assignment is not given and also because of change in cost element category
Rgd Prakash
Similar Messages
-
Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error
Workflow Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error, but settlement is done no problem in updation. But notification error there.
Notification of completion cannot be generated
Problems occurred when generating a mail
Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
Error handling for work item 000112476185
Work item 000112476185: Object 000020154849 method UPDATESETTLEMENTRULE cannot be executed
Call transaction was canceled.
No errors occurred -> Details in long text
No errors occurred -> Details in long text
Please advice what could be the reason this error.
Best Regards,
PrabhakarMessage no. WL821
Message no. FD009
Message no. WL863
Problems occurred when generating a mail
Message no. SWF_RUN534
Error handling for work item 000133673828
Message no. SWF_RUN630
Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
Message no. SWF_RUN535
Thanks,
Prabhakar -
KO8G open work order settlement
Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradeep
Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AMHey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep -
Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88
Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
PradeepAshok,
Thanks for the reply.
We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
Thanks
Pradeep -
Defaulting G/L account in work order settlement rule
Hello,
I have set my work order settlement profile, the default object to be G/L. However, in the equipment master record, at the Organization tab (account assignment group), i don't see any field for G/L account.
When i create settlement rule with default, i get error that rule cannot be created with default.
Where can i enter the G/L account in the equipment master to enable the auto settlement rule creation?you can always explain the concept of FI account through Cost Center and CO account through Cost Element from Plant Maintenance and FI/CO organisation point of view and in relation to business process.
As you cant define in master data you cant get it automatically copied into settlement rule and hence have to maintain it manually as system dont know which GL to use as settlement receiver as not maintained in master data. -
Reverse work order settlements
Experts,
I need to reverse all the work order settlements that were done in a month due to some error - Appreciate it if someone can let me know how to take care of this.
All answers/inputs/thoughts will be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
Thanks,
NanditaKO8G
-
Error while creating Work Order
Hello Experts,
I am getting below error while creating work order via add-on named beas but the error seems to coming from SBO.
Please advise.
Thanks
DeepakHi,
Plz check this thread:
What does this error mean? -
Error while creating work order from purchase order
Dear All,
We are having a subcontracting scenario where we are creating a Work order from PO but getting the below error.
Error - "No master data assigned to partners-locations-product combination."
Done all the setting mentioned in the below thread but the error still persist.
Error in Generating Work order from Purchase Order
Any suggestions on which master data we need to check?
Thanks,
mahesh.Hi Mahesh
In the below transaction
/SCA/MFGCFG - Work Order Configuration
Can you maintain Master data Assigment properly
Valid From
Valid To
Active---Checked
Can you please list what you maintained
Regards
Vinod -
Error when printing work order with iw32
Hello all,
When i was printing work order using IW32, the order success to be saved but it can't be printed. And i get this error message :
Express document "Update was terminated" received from author ...
i check with T-Code SM13, and i found error on
PM_ORDER_PRINT_CONTROL
further, i go check to ABAP Short dump, and found the error analysis
A RAISE statement in the program "SAPLSFES " raised the exception
condition "CONTROL_FLUSH_ERROR".
Since the exception was not intercepted by a superior program
in the hierarchy, processing was terminated.
have anyone know the OSS or have some experience to solve this problem ? hope you can help me..
thank you for your attention..
Regards,
Anggara MahardikaHi
Can u let us know whether u are trying to Save the Print out on to ur Desktop ... or using GUI_DOWNLOAD Fm in ur program ...
surya -
How to prevent an error of [WIP work order ... is locked-]
Hello experts
Can someone tell me how to prevent an error which [The WIP work order associated with this transaction is currently locked and being updated by another user. Please wait for a few seconds and try again.Transaction processor error].
How can you prevent that error?
P.S.
Oracle support told me [When you make data of mtl_transaction_interface, give same transaction_header_id to all data. Then, you kick worker with appointed transaction_header_id. Or, you set up being uncompatible with workers].
I cannot allow that making with same transaction_header_id and being uncompatible with worker on my system.Hi santosh,
You can implement badi BBP_DOC_CHECK to check vendor email and issue error message.
Kind regards,
Yann -
Error while running Internal Order Settlement (KO88)
Hi,
We are in ECC 6. We are facing an error while settling one internal order using T.Code KO88.
The error message says :
Execute amount settlement up to and including settlement period 001 2009 first
Message KD262
We have already settled the internal order upto previous month. But, we are unable to settle the order for the current month.
Any suggestion please.
Regards,
GanesanIn production Order maintain Settlement type as Full Settlement.
In CO01 Create production Order or CO02 Change production order go to
Header -
> Settlement Rule
Maintain Category, Receiver, Percentage, FUL (as settlement type)
Change settlement type to FUL if it is PER.
PER Settlement Type - Only settles the cost incurred on the posting period
FUL Settlment Type - Settles all the cost incurred after the previous costing run -
Error while generating Work Order
I have a problem while generating Work orders in SNC.
I set the configuration as belows.
<General setting for Work Order generation>
1.Granularity -> Work Order per Purchase Order Item
2.Create WOs with Report -> Check
3.Publish Work Order Upon Creation and PO change -> check
4.Send Work Order Information -> Upon Agreement and when a Phase Is Completed
5.Send Production Progress Notification -> When a Phase Is Completed
<Phase Structure>
1.Comp. from SC Order -> Use SC Comp. as Input, Product and Co-Products as Output
<Master Data Assignment>
1.MD Used for WO -> Phase Structure
2.Active -> Check
When I use the program /SCA/WO_CREATE for generate Work Orders, Run time error occurs with below messages.
Runtime Errors OBJECTS_OBJREF_NOT_ASSIGNED
Except. CX_SY_REF_IS_INITIAL
<Error analysis>
The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_REF_IS_INITIAL', was not caught in
procedure "GET_PIO_LCTYPE" "(METHOD)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
The reason for the exception is:
You attempted to use a 'NULL' object reference (points to 'nothing')
access a component (variable: "LS_NODEREF-R_NODE").
An object reference must point to an object (an instance of a class)
before it can be used to access components.
Either the reference was never set or it was set to 'NULL' using the
CLEAR statement.
<Missing RAISING Clause in Interface>
Program /SCA/CL_WO_PHASE==============CP
Include /SCA/CL_WO_PHASE==============CM00V
Row 1
Module type (METHOD)
Module Name GET_PIO_LCTYPE
<Trigger Location of Exception>
Program /SCA/CL_WO_PHASE==============CP
Include /SCA/CL_WO_PHASE==============CM00V
Row 45
Module type (METHOD)
Module Name GET_PIO_LCTYPE
Please let me know what I have to do for this error.
Thanks and Regards
JTHi JT
Clearly the problem is with the method GET_PIO_LCTYPE of interface /SCA/CL_WO_PHASE
Check whether note 1363834 should be implemented
It could be because of some corrupted WO entries in database
or some customizing entry it is expecting
suggest you to debug the method and try to check what it is expecting
Best Regards
Vinod -
Error while doing investment order settlement
Dear all,
My client has not settled certain line items in the
previous year for some Investment orders. Now when he
is carrying out settlement (KO88), for the current
period, he is getting error message " AW 624"(first
settle items from the previous year in the previous
year). How can he settle previous years item in the
current year since FI & CO periods are all closed for
prev. year.
The settlement rule is AUC in this case.
Thanks in adv.
VijayaHi
As per note 82514:
If you simply want to settle the unsettled values from the previous year
in the current year, proceed as described in Notes 425601 and 819197. If
settlement for the previous year is no longer possible, due to concluded
fiscal years in FI and CO, or the reporting problems described above
have to be avoided due to settlement in the previous year, settlement in
the current fiscal year is then particularly necessary.
As far as I know, if note 425601 is fully implemented, AW624 should
become editable in OBA5. Could you please check if the coding has been
correctly applied? Especially below steps need to be done manually:
As a prerequisite for Transaction OBA5, you must first of all implement
the program corrections of note 425601 and insert the following
table entries :
o As of Release 4.6: Use Transaction SM31 to include application
area 'AW' into table V_T100SA.
o Start Transaction SM31 to include the following entry in table
T100S:
'Application area MsgNo Allowed Standard Switch off'
AW 624 EWI E 'X'
Regards
Javier Reviriego -
Error while doing production order settlement
Hi frds,
When I am doing the production order settlement, I am getting the following error
" There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible".
The status of the order is TECO CNF DLV PRC BASC BCRQ GMPS MANC.
RajnishRajnish,
Please check if there is cost balance for the order, to me it looks like the order is already settled. In the order display mode (CO03) menu bar Goto->Costs->Balance.
If balance exists then the problem may be related to the settlement period used in the Intial screen of transaction KO88. Please check the cost incured period and use the same period as settlement period.
Regards,
Prasobh -
Hi
I am not an expert in Work orders and appreciate your input.
A work order has been settled to a Sales order ( I can't understand the logic behind settling to a Sales Order). The Profit centre assigned to the sales order is wrong. I.e. they need it to be the same as that in the work order.
1) Is it possible to reverse the settlement and
2) change the profit centre in the Sales order
3) Change the settlement rule of the work order
The user informed the reason to settle the work order is just merely to close the work order. Is it mandatory to settle the work order in order to close. If so could you please explain the logic behind the requirement?
Thanks & Regards
NadiniHey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have an iphone 4 and I am thinking about getting an ipad2. Can I use the same apple id and itunes account with both of them? Will my contacts and apps transfer over to the iPad2?
-
Not able to install photoshop elements 11 on MacBook Pro OS 10.7.4
spent last two days downloading photoshop elements 11 onto MacBook Pro OS 10.7.4 multiple times with no luck opening and installing popup reads: no default application specified to open the document PhotoshopElements _11_LS15-2.7z other download read
-
Apexlib page item validation not shown correctly
Good morning guys! I have a question concerning the Apexlib page item validations. Basically I just want to validate page item values and have errors displayed in a notification region on the very same page on submit. I set up the Apexlib, which work
-
Capacity sizing document for Forms on iAS(Oracle Application Server)
Hi, I need to know from where I can get Capacity planning document for Forms on Oracle Application Server for Intel/Solaris/Aix arch.Please Advise. Regards, Noman
-
Is there a fuse in the Mac pro?
My Mac Pro was last working during a seminar, then I packed it up and when trying after a few weeks to reboot, it remains totally silent. Nothing, not the least spin of a hard drive or anything at all. Yes I did check the power cable, changed cable