ERS Payment

Can someone please tell me how I can display a P.O based payment through ERS.
I have done MIGO succesfully but the payment is not reflected in FBL1N. So is there a way to look to see if a payment has been scheduled or not ( to see if ERS is working or not)
Thank you.

Hi,
For every purchase order with flag 'ERS' a table entry is generated,               
if a goods receipt is posted, this GR should be invoiced via ERS                    
(Tr. MRRL). Manually posted invoices should be avoided, because                     
the table entry will not be deleted.
Best regards
Erika

Similar Messages

  • ERS payment didn't gemerate

    hello everyone,
    here is the issue : user changed PO line item to ERS after goods receipt was generated, so ERS payment didn't generate for this PO line item, now what can we do to make it work?
    one way I was thinking is to let vendor send the invoice so that we can do 3 way matching and pay the vendor, but I am sure system should have a way to handle it.
    pls help.

    Hi,
    Please follow check the below settings.
    01. In Vendor master ERS indicator has to be checked
    02.In Purchase order ERS indicator Has to be checked
    03.In SAP Customizing Implementation Guide >Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification-->Message Determination
    Maintain Message : check all the setting are correct for ERS related message type
    Maintain Conditions : Maintain condition Record for the combination you want.
    Then perform the ERS settlement through the transaction MRRL
    Hope this solves your problem
    Thanks & Regards,
    G.Sridhar

  • ERS payment didn't generate

    hello everyone,
    here is the issue : user changed PO line item to ERS after goods receipt was generated, so ERS payment didn't generate for this PO line item, now what can we do to make it work?
    one way I was thinking is to let vendor send the invoice so that we can do 3 way matching and pay the vendor, but I am sure system should have a way to handle it.
    pls help.

    Not sure but you may be able to do :
    In migo the A01 transaction is used for goods receipt an A02 for return delivery. Do a drop down in MIGO you will see, so you can reverse the goods receipt
    And cancel the purchase order and create a new one correctly. Are u getting an error message if so what is it.

  • ERS - Payment method not on the invoice

    Hi All,
    In the process of creating invoices using ERS, the payment method from the vendor master will not be defaulted on the invoice.
    Is there any way, may be a usereixt/badi, to default the first payment method given in the vendor master on the invoices created in background.
    Thanks,
    Venkat

    Found another method

  • AR DATA FLOW (TABLE LEVEL) - ON ACCOUNT CREDITS & CASH RECEIPTS편

    제품 : FIN_AR
    작성날짜 : 2003-09-16
    AR DATA FLOW (TABLE LEVEL) - ON ACCOUNT CREDITS & CASH RECEIPTS편
    ================================================================
    PURPOSE
    이 문서에서는 AR table들에 대해 어떻게 data가 들어가는지에 대해
    설명한다.
    On Account와 Cash Receipt을 기준으로 설명한다.
    Explanation
    1. On Account Credits
    특정 Customer에 대한 Credit정보를 입력했으나, 아직 특정 Invoice에는 Apply되지 않은 정보를 "On Account" credit이라고 한다.
    Credit정보가 들어있기 때문에, Credit Memo와 유사하게 table에 저장된다.
    Credit Memo와 다른 점은 아래와 같다.
    o When first entered the payment schedule will be fully remaining.
    o When first entered no records are inserted into AR_RECEIVABLE_APPLI
    CATIONS_ALL.
    o The line records will have NULL values in
    PREVIOUS_CUSTOMER_TRX_ID
    PREVIOUS_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINE_ID
    o The distribution lines have to be typed in as there is no invoice
    to copy them from.
    "On Account"는 같은 Supplier상에서는 어떠한 invoice에 대해서 적용이 가능하다는 점에서,
    특정 invoice에만 apply가 가능한 Credit Memo와는 다르다.
    2. Cash Receipts
    Recipt정보가 입력되면, 아래의 table들에 insert된다.
    o AR_CASH_RECEIPTS_ALL
    o AR_CASH_RECEIPT_HISTORY_ALL
    o AR_PAYMENT_SCHEDULES_ALL
    o AR_RECEIVABLE_APPLICATIONS_ALL
    입력된 Receipt정보가 특정 invoice와 match되면, 추가 record가
    AR_RECEIVABLE_APPLICATIONS_ALL에 insert되고, AR_PAYMENT_SCHEDULE_ALL에는 update된다.
    | | | |
    | RECEIPT |------------------| PAYMENT |
    | | | SCHEDULE |
    | |
    | |
    ^ ^
    /|\ /|\
    | | | |
    | RECEIPT | |APPLICATIONS|
    | HISTORY | | |
    2.1 AR_CASH_RECEIPTS_ALL
    Receipt에 대한 기본정보가 insert된다. 한 receipt당 한줄이 insert된다.
    Key = CASH_RECEIPT_ID (from sequence AR_CASH_RECEIPTS_S)
    Important Fields
    AMOUNT - Value of receipt in entered currency
    RECEIPT_NUMBER - Payment Number entered by user.
    STATUS - (APP)lied, (UNAPP)lied, (REV)ersed Payment,
    (STOP) payment, (NSF) insufficient funds.
    It will only change to APP once the whole
    amount of the receipt is applied.
    REVERSAL_DATE - NULL unless receipt reversed
    PAY_FROM_CUSTOMER - Contains CUSTOMER_ID for RA_CUSTOMERS
    2.2 AR_CASH_RECEIPT_HISTORY_ALL
    Receipt하나당 한줄의 data가 insert되고, GL로 Posting된 정보가 들어간다.
    Receipt이 reverse되면, 새로운 row가 insert된다.
    Key = CASH_RECEIPT_HISTORY_ID (from sequence)
    Important Fields
    CASH_RECEIPT_ID - Foreign key to AR_CASH_RECEIPTS record.
    STATUS - CLEARED for manually input receipts.
    GL_DATE - Accounting date
    ACCOUNT_CODE_COMBINATION_ID - Key to GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
    POSTING_CONTROL_ID - -3 if unposted
    REVERSAL_POSTING_CONTROL_ID - NULL unless payment reversed
    CURRENT_RECORD_FLAG - Y if this is latest record
    PRV_STAT_CASH_RECEIPT_HIST_ID - Key to previous receipt history record.
    2.3 AR_PAYMENT_SCHEDULES_ALL
    Invoice에 apply된 Total 금액정보가 저장된다.
    Key = PAYMENT_SCHEDULE_ID (from sequence)
    Important Fields
    CUSTOMER_TRX_ID - NULL
    CASH_RECEIPT_ID - Foreign key to AR_CASH_RECEIPTS record.
    AMOUNT_DUE_ORIGINAL - Total amount of receipt (usually negative)
    AMOUNT_DUE_REMAINING - Unapplied amount of receipt.
    AMOUNT_APPLIED - How much of this receipt is applied .
    STATUS - (OP)en or (CL)osed. Will only be closed if
    AMOUNT_DUE_REMAINING is zero.
    All of the fields holding LINE, TAX and FREIGHT amounts are NULL.
    2.4 AR_RECEIVABLE_APPLICATIONS
    Receipt이 처음 생성될때, 한줄의 data가 이 table에 insert되고,
    invoice에 대해 Apply혹은 Unapply가발생하면, 두줄씩 새롭게 생성된다.
    예를들면, 아래와 같다.
    Record 1 UNAPP 700
    { Record 2      UNAPP       -200
    { Record 3      APP          200      cross referenced to the Invoice
    { Record 4      UNAPP       -500
    { Record 5      APP          500      cross referenced to 2nd Invoice
    The sum of the amounts on records that have a particuar status should add up
    to the running totals on the payment schedulesi, but with the opposite sign.
    i.e. In the example above
    AR_PAYMENT_SCHEDULES.AMOUNT_DUE_ORIGINAL = -700
    AR_PAYMENT_SCHEDULES.AMOUNT_DUE_REMAINING = 0
    AR_PAYMENT_SCHEDULES.AMOUNT_APPLIED = -700
    UNAPP = 700 -200 -500 = 0
    APP = 200 + 500 = 700
    Statuses of these records can be:-
    UNAPP - Unapplied
    APP - Applied
    ACC - On Account
    UNID - Unidentified (Customer Not known)
    이러한 record내역은 invoice/credit/receipt에 있는 Transaction History form에서 확인할 수 있다.
    2.5 AR_PAYMENT_SCHEDULE (Invoice)
    Receipt이 특정 invoice에 apply되면, invoice에 대한 Payment Schedule record가 update된다.
    remaining amount field 값은 Payment금액만큼 줄어들게 된다.
    만약, remaining amount가 "0"가 되면, invoice Payment schedule은 closed상태가 된다.
    예를들어, Receipt금액 "200"이 "1175" invoice금액(Tax금액 175가 포함된)에 apply되었다면, Invoice의 Payment Schedule은 아래와 같이 조정된다.
    Before After
    AMOUNT_DUE_REMAINING 1175.00 975.00
    AMOUNT_LINE_ITEMS_REMAINING 1000.00 800.00
    TAX_REMAINING 175.00 175.00
    FREIGHT_REMAINING 0.00 0.00
    Note that receipts are applied in a fixed sequence:-
    1. Line Amounts
    2. Tax Amounts
    3. Freight Amounts
    ie The TAX_REMAINING figure will only start to decrease when the
    AMOUNT_LINE_ITEMS_REMAINING is zero.
    Reference Documents
    Note : 29277.1 & 29278.1

    Hi,
    This query works fine for me:
    SELECT CR.CASH_RECEIPT_ID,
                CR.RECEIPT_NUMBER,
                CR.RECEIPT_DATE,
                CR.CURRENCY_CODE,
                DECODE ( CR.TYPE, 'MISC', NULL, NVL (SUM (DECODE (RA.STATUS, 'ACC', NVL (RA.AMOUNT_APPLIED, 0), 0)), 0)) ON_ACCOUNT_AMOUNT
             FROM AR_RECEIVABLE_APPLICATIONS_ALL RA,
                AR_CASH_RECEIPTS_ALL CR,
                AR_RECEIPT_METHODS RM
          WHERE RA.CASH_RECEIPT_ID = CR.CASH_RECEIPT_ID
                AND CR.RECEIPT_METHOD_ID = RM.RECEIPT_METHOD_ID
                AND CR.ORG_ID = <org_id>
          GROUP BY CR.CASH_RECEIPT_ID,
                CR.RECEIPT_DATE,
                CR.RECEIPT_NUMBER,
                RM.NAME,
                CR.CURRENCY_CODE,
                CR.TYPE order by receipt_date desc
    Let me know if it worked.
    Octavio

  • IDoc error In case of ERS procedure, please enter terms of payment

    Hi,
    I tried to use BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to post purchase order. However, I encountered this error.
    IDoc error In case of ERS procedure, please enter terms of payment
    I passed the payment term in IDOC PORDCH. Segment E1BPMEPOHEADER-PMTTRMS has value filled out. This value is passed into the BAPI correctly but for some reasons, it got cleared out in the BAPI. Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

    Check
    BAPI_PO_CREATE1 -  E 06 436 In case of account assignment

  • Payment block for ERS (MRRL) not working

    Dear SAP gurus,
    Payment block in case of ERS is nor working, we have set all the Tolerence limit, even set in vendor master as payment block as P
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Vinod

    ok

  • Payment Block A in ERS document

    Experts,
    When we put an A blcok in the vendor master and post invoices using LIV, the invoice is posted. When you display the invoice document, you will not see the A block on document level. We know that when the invoice is due, the payment proposal will report that the invoices can not be paid due to the A block in the vendor master. The A block need to be removed from the VM to be able to pay the invoices.
    However, if we post ERS invoices for the same vendor, the ERS document posted contain the A blcok on document level and we need to remove the A block on document level.
    Why is there a difference between ERS and "normal" invoices with these A blocks ?
    Appreciate your feed back
    Thanks
    Fred

    Hi,
    If you have maintained the QM Control key in the material master which has invoice block tick in the setting. the standard behavior of the SAP system is as the following:
    If to the material the QM in procurement is active and in the QM control key invoice block is active the invoice will be blocked for quality reasons if there is still no usage decision for the inspection lot or if
    the inspection lot is rejected.
    The invoice itself will be blocked automatically, the Payment Block Key will be set to R. The Blocking reason I is not visible in the invoice and has nothing to do with the settings in OMR9.
    As per the online documentation:
    Quality Inspection (I)
    If a material is defined as being relevant for quality management, goods receipts for this material are posted to stock in quality inspection. Invoices for the material are blocked until the inspection has been
    successfully completed.
    If more than one goods receipt is posted for an order item, an inspection is carried out for every goods receipt. In Invoice Verification, the system reacts differently depending on whether goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification is active:
    Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification is defined in the purchase order.
    The invoice is blocked if the inspection has not been completed for the goods receipt.
    Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification is not defined in the purchase order.
    The invoice is blocked if any goods receipts are still in quality inspection. If an invoice is posted before the goods are received, it cannot be blocked for quality inspection.
    Hope the informations are useful to you!
    Best Regards,
    Gladys xing
    Edited by: Gladys Xing on Sep 15, 2009 4:30 PM

  • ERS posting reversal, but not payment

    Hello
    I am having an issue with ERS PO's in our system.
    Scenario is as follows -
    ERS flag isn't initially set on the PO. Then, a GR posted is from SES release, however because ERS flag isn't turned on EKRS table wasn't populated. Thus ERS would not create IR for the GR.
    ERS flag was then set for the PO.
    User reversed the GR. Reverse GR posted to EKRS therefore ERS batch picked up the reverse GR to post a reverse IR.
    ERS will still not pick up the original GR to create a IR doc.
    As a result, vendor account is incorrect and also the GR/IR is incorrect.
    Any possible solutions to make correct the PO history?
    Due to user error, we will always have cases where ERS flag is turned on after GR.
    What is the best way to avoid this imbalanced PO scenario in the future? Should user first reverse GR prior to setting ERS fla

    You should do the GR reversal BEFORE you change the PO to ERS.  
    After you reverse the GR you then
    -  change the PO to ERS
    -  do the GR (receipt which is the "original" receipt of the product that you had to reverse because the ERS flag was not set)
    If you see this happening alot then I'd suggest looking at your processes and improve the process to make sure this does not happen.   For example - it sounds like you are taking existing suppliers with existing POs and converting them to ERS.  This would result in POs not being checked for ERS because they were created before the supplier was an ERS supplier.   As part of the process to convert the supplier to ERS you need to add a few steps such as:
    1)  identify open POs/SAs and either close them and create new ones OR convert all of them to ERS.
    2)  you would also need to identify what POs/SAs have pending invoices and communicate with the supplier what paper invoices they need to send and when they should stop sending the paper invoices.
    Sandra

  • Reg Vendor with two payment currencies- ERS

    Hi
    We defined two partner bank types in vendor master [Seerate Bank a/c one in USD, one in CAD]
    We have Schedule agreement created in USD
    When ERS invoice is posted its picking by default CAD bank a/c details, we wish to it picks USD bank a/c details
    How we can achieve this?

    If you want the Partner Bank Type to be automatically populated during the ERS settlement process you will need to do customization to make this work.  
    Sandra

  • How to set up automatic payment for the purchase order

    Hi, All,
    I have one question how to set up automatically payment for the Rent Office purchase Order?
    There is the requirement from the client. They want to create one kind of purchase order for the Office Rent, then pay the fees in the certain time of every month to the vendor for the rent fees without any invoice. Whatu2019s the normal solution for this kind of purchase order? Is it ERS? Or something else?
    Please give me the details and business flow. Also please tell me how to setup in the SAP and T-code.
    Thanks in advance

    Either you can set up ERS or you can pay directly from the FI side.
    Prerequisites
    Evaluated receipt settlement must be flagged in the purchase order item.
    The vendor must be flagged as being subject to ERS in the vendor master record.
    The goods receipt must refer to a purchase order.
    Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification must be defined for the purchase order item.
    A tax code must have been maintained in the purchase order item.
    The order price of the materials may not be an estimated price.
    If you flag a vendor as being subject to ERS, the system sets the ERS indicator as a default in each item when you create a purchase order for the vendor. You can prevent this happening for certain vendors by flagging the info record for the material and the vendor as not being subject to ERS.
    In Purchasing, you can delete the default ERS indicator in a purchase order item.
    Choose Logistics Invoice Verification ® Automatic Settlement ® Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS).
    The selection screen appears.
    You can use the following criteria to narrow down selection of the transactions to be settled:
    Company code
    Plant
    Goods receipt posting date
    Goods receipt document
    Fiscal year of the goods receipt
    Vendor
    Purchase order and order item
    You can define the selection criteria for the invoice documents by:
    Delivery
    Purchase order
    Purchase order item
    Goods receipt document
    Credit memo
    Invoice
    Currency
    Choose  Execute.
    The system issues a log for Evaluated Receipt Settlement, which displays the following:
    Settled
    In line with your selection criteria, the system displays all the order items that were settled (or if you are working in test mode, which would have been settled).
    Could not be settled
    In line with your selection criteria, the system displays all order items for which ERS is defined but could not be settled. It also lists the reasons.
    If the system reports being unable to invoice a transaction, you should exclude the transaction from ERS to avoid it being included in the log the next time ERS is run.
    Select the item and choose Exclude from ERS.
    The system also generates and possibly sends a message to inform the vendor(s) about the transaction settled, depending on the settings in Customizing.
    You can display the following environment information for the order items selected. To do this, choose Goto ®:
    Display purchase order
    Display invoice
    Display material document
    Display long text

  • Single ERS Invoice for multiple POs with different GS and same IP

    Dear All,
    I have a Requirement as per the below scenario:
    We need to have single invoice created using ERS (MRRL) functionality in the below scenario:
    Two POs created with different Partner function GS (goods supplier) and same IP (Invoice party partner function).
    Ex:
    GS IP PO GR ERS
    vendor1 10001 4500001 500001 Yes ( GR-IV-Yes, GR done- Yes, same payment terms - 001)
    vendor2 10001 4500002 500002 Yes ( GR-IV-Yes, GR done- Yes, same payment terms - 001)
    When I run ERS for last 1 week (GR) and select the option (Doc selection – per IP or other criteria like GRs posted in last one week) , system should create 1 invoice document. Standard SAP posts 2 documents for each GS.
    I have tried using 2 user exits for MRRL, but none of them work for this functionality.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Go for  MIRO without MRRL.
    Instead ERS, you can post single  Invoice(MIRO) for multiple POs  for one vendor.
    OR
    Check with Technical consultant and go for development to have single ERS output for multiple ERS invoice documents for single vendor.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • ERS and delivery costs

    Hi guys,
    We have following two problems in case of ERS vendors.
    1) We have certain delivery costs also in purchase order.  The same vendor will receive material payment and freight related payments.  In MRRL transaction, we select "Selected goods items + Planned del costs"  and run MRRL.  But after this also, amount excluding freight amount is posted in the invoice and delivery cost is not being picked for invoice.  How to get material cost + delivery cost also in one invoice
    2) In another scenario, we have different freight vendor.  For this we are configuring ERS for delivery costs also.  But the problem is in configuration we have to mention the vendor code in "Specify Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs".  Can we give vendor code as "  *  " here?  Or is there any other way of doing configuration without mentioning vendor code and it is applicable for all vendors ?
    Please suggest the solution for the above two problems.

    Hi Pankaj,
    Thanks for ur reply.  This will work.  But my problem is with this, we have to include all the freight vendors in configuration.  But we do not know how many vendors are there for the company.  If any new vendor is created, who has to enter this in the configuration..
    Is there any other way of making this functionality applicable for all vendors.
    Other problem is in our PO we have basic rate and 3 to 4 delivery costs,.  We have made 103 and then 105 and run ERS run and arranged payment to material vendor (it is same for both material and freight)
    But for some reason we are making return delivery against material document with 105 movement.  When we run MRRL for this, it will generate credit memo for the quantity returned to vendor.  But delivery costs are also added.  We want to avoid delivery costs in credit memo and it should only take material cost
    How to acheive this?  Please help me out

  • ERS PO

    Hello,
    If I am checking a PO as ERS , the terms of payment along with tax code is mandatory ?
    regards
    NBanu

    Yes in ERS PO the terms of payment and tax code is mandatory.

  • ERS Automatic Settlement and adding tax code to SRM PO

    Hi.
    For ERS Automatic Settlement, the ERS flag has been acticvated on the Vendor master and BP records. The issue we now have is that for new PO's for this ERS supplier, the system gives the error message [Enter a tax code for automatic settlement].
    I cannot find the drop down field on the SRM PO screen where the end user can enter in this tax code value (as end users do not enter this on Cart). How do I set this value? Up until now, all tax code selection & amount was entered in the SAP backend invoice screens with MIRO, therefore not part of SRM, but ERS will change this.
    We have deployed SRM 5.0.
    Thank you.
    Dave.

    Hi Dave
    As per i know TAX validation is required for ERS settlement in standard SRM.
    Enterprise Buyer automatically posts the invoice on the basis of the purchase order and the confirmation. ERS within Enterprise Buyer applies to local purchase orders and confirmations.
    Determines invoice amount for this ordering transaction from price entered on PO, terms of
    payment, tax information, and delivery quantity. ERS must be specified on the business partner
    master record.
    Purchase orders generated in the back end system can be settled using the ERS functionality within
    this back end.
    ERS only recommended when you and your vendor have a clear agreement on the conditions.
    please check it out any BADI to resolve this since sap code checks if ers then looks tax information also. as you said earlier you dont have any information on sc ( does not have tax). if sc has tax it would have copied into po.
    regards
    Muthu

Maybe you are looking for