Excise base value for CVD Calculation in Import depot pricing?
Hi,
In case of Import procedure the condition base value which is copying to excise should be sum of assessable value + Basic customs but it is not happening..
kindly suggest me on the same..
regards,
Hi
for custome invoice valu will be
1) IN CVD
2) ECESS on CVD (%)
3) SHECESS on CVD (%)
4) additinal
5) IN Basic customs
6)Custom's Edu Cess
7)Sec ECESS ON Customs
out of these
1 t0 4 will be in excise invoice
1)chek in po tax code 0
2)chek following setting in spro-
Logistic general-tax on goods movement-account determination-specifiy exciseaccounts per trasnction and psecify excise gruopper transction chek IP here for you Grop setting
3) chek condiiton type with accuralse and account key is there or not
GRPO IP CR CLEAR
GRPO IP DR MSUSP
GRPO IP DR ONHOLD
GRPO IP DR PLAAED
GRPO IP DR PLAAT1
GRPO IP DR PLABED
GRPO IP DR PLACESS
GRPO IP DR PLAECS
GRPO IP DR RG23AED
GRPO IP DR RG23AT1
GRPO IP DR RG23BED
GRPO IP DR RG23ECS
GRPO IP DR RG23SED
EWPO IP CR CLEAR
EWPO IP DR PLAECS
EWPO IP DR RG23AED
EWPO IP DR RG23AT1
EWPO IP DR RG23BED
EWPO IP DR RG23ECS
EWPO IP DR RG23SED
Regards
Kailas ugale
Similar Messages
-
In MIGO wrong excise base value in import po
Hi,
We have done import PO applied the excise tax code EI, then we try to create MIGO except miro, but in MIGO in we changed the qty for example in PO 100qty and price 100 so total amount is 10000 so we get excise base value is 1000, but now we change the qty in mIGO as 10qty we get same excise base value as 1000 its not calculted.
please suggest me the any config
Thanks
ShitalHi,
i have test in SAP note u suggested
Excise base defaulted incorrectly at the time of excise invoice capture in the imports scenario with ADC (additional duty of customs) being applicable. The excise duty values are picked from the commercial invoice captured but the excise base value is being calculated incorrectly.
but my scenario is different
Thanks
Shital -
Excise Base value calculated wrongly in GR
Dear experts,
When preparing Bought out goods receipt in migo,excise base value is coming wrongly(not as per PO) in sometimes.
If we come back from the screen without saving & then try again. That time the base value is calculating correctly.
This kind of situation is arising inconsistantly. Not regularly.
Please suggest to overcome this issue.
Regards
M.SarathiHi,
When we capture excise invoice in MIGO, SAP will default the excise base value for the total PO quantity.
For eg. if the total PO qty is 100, and if the price is 10 INR, then during MIGO, system will show 100*10 = 1000 INR.
Even if you have posted a partial GR of say 10 nos. already, and you are now trying to post the balance 90 nos in MIGO,
then also, system will suggest the base value as 1000 INR (instead of 900 INR). This is a bug in the excise tab.
Only option is to overwrite the base value manually as per the GR qty.
Regards
Prabhu -
Update Excise base value in MRP based and Non-MRP based billing
Hi Gurus,
We need to update Excise Base Value for Statistical Condition type. How to configure the same ?
Sl.No Pricing Condition Type Active Statistical Passed to Accounting
1 MRP Price (Statistical)
2 Abatement (Statistical)
3 Surcharge (Active&Passed to Accounting)
4 Assessabel value (Statistical)
(No:4 This is the base for calculating Excise duties i.e Excise Base Value)
5 List Price (Statistical)
6 Customer Discount(Statistical)
7 Surcharge(Active&Passed to Accounting)
8 Net Price (Active&Passed to Accounting)
9 BED (Active&Passed to Accounting)
10 ECess (Active&Passed to Accounting)
11 SECess (Active&Passed to Accounting)
12 Total collected from Customer(Statistical)
Issue: When there is MRP Price higher than the List Price, then the Cutomer will be charged on the basis of Net Price only, but the duties amount to be paid to the government on MRP Price. so in this case I can not calculate Excise Duties on the Actual Net Price condition which is active and passed on to accounting. And always the Excise duties to be calculated on Assessable value(no:4). But that condition type if I make activate then it will pass to accounting and also getting added to the Net Value(KOMP-NETWR). How to come out of this situation.(as per the customer requirement both MRP based materials and non-MRP based materials are also considered in the same sale order i.e with the same pricing procedure).
Becasue of this EXBAS is not getting updated in the J_1IEXCDTL.
Gurus, Share your valuable experiences and suggestions.
Thanks &Regards
Sreekanth
09611147585Dear Lakshmipathi,
As per your suggestion, I have maintained Material Assessable Value and then also the duty values are calculating on the basis of Assessable value maintained in the Pricing Procedure. It is not taking the Material Assessable Value into consideration. And it is not getting updated the Excise Base Value.
In which case Material Assessable value will be taken into consideration?
How to update the Excise Base Value in J_1IEXCDTL tables?
Thanks&Regards
Sreekanth -
Excise base value Posted Incorrectly
Dear Expert,
In our Client , the user have posted the incorrect Excise Base Value for particular material .Part II has already posted. We cannot cancelled the Excise invoice as the stock is already been consumed. Please Provide the solution for it.
Regards,
Kapil.Hi,
You need to post a excise JV ...steps are
1)go to t code J1IH
2)Go to other adjustments tab,input the material document number,year ,excise group company code and plant and post
Note that post the amount that you need to adjust.ie suppose u have posted Rs 100 during j1iex which should have been 90 ,then in j1ih post only Rs 10
Note:1) The entry which is passed in the above tcode will not be refected in cenvat register(j2i9) ,but it is captured in ER1 report (J2IER1)
2)Subtransaction type MRDY is hit during the above transaction
Regards
Sandeep -
In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO
Hi expert's,
In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO,with what referance values get add to base value.
waiting for your valuable response,
Regards
V.rajhi,
we Tried with your following reply ! but still not finding exact value in base value .
(MATERIAL PRICE* QTY IN MIGO * EXCHANGE RATE)
thanks & regards
V.Raj -
Excise base value is not picking for Imports
Dear All,
Excise base value is not picking for Imports when doing MIGO and BED/E CESS/S&H E CESS also not picking.
Please suggest me
Thanks,
TiruHi,
In case of Imports, you have to define following condiiton types in MM Pricing Procedure;
JCDB IN:Basic Custom Duty
JCV1 IN : CVD
JECV IN : Ed Cess on CVD
J1CV IN : H&SECess on CVD
JEDB IN : Ed Cess on BCD
JSDB IN : H&SECess on BCD
JADC Addnl Duty of Custom
These should be created as a delivery cost condition in M/06. And assign the accruals to these in M/08.
Folowing Gl Accounts will be assigned to those accruals in OBYC;
CVD Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCV1, JECV, J1CV, JADC) and Customs Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCDB, JEDB, JSDB)
Now follow the below procedure for Import Purchase;
1. ME21N u2013 Create Import Purchase Order (Here assign the Vendor of Customs Office to the above mentioned 7 condition types in "Details" of "Conditions")
2. MIRO u2013 Enter Customs Invoice w.r.t. Import PO (Here select "Planned Delivery Cost" and do LIV for Customs office Vendor, enter values for duties as per Bill of Entry manullay during LIV)
3. J1IEX u2013 Capture Bill of Entry
4. MIGO u2013 Goods Receipt against Import PO
5. J1IEX u2013 Post Bill of Entry
6. MIRO u2013 Enter Vendor Invoice
7. MIRO u2013 Enter Clearing Agentu2019s Invoice -
Excise Base Value wrong for import
HI expert
i have import po Value is 1000, and my custom duties(inventerised) is 100,2,1.
But when i am doing capturing excise in migo , my excise base value is coming 1100, it must come 1103.
Kindly let me know were i m missing
regard
NabilHi,
check your custom excise invoice check value properly
check your default setting also
Regards
Kailas Ugale -
In correct Excise Base Value in Import PO
Dear Experts ,
I have an query on the Excise Base value in Import PO .
The problem is I have made a Import Po , paid the customs duty through MIRO & now when I am doing J1IEX_C wrt to commercial invoice , its showing the Excise base value which is less then the value it should be , the tax amt like Excise BED, AED, Se cess & E cess is getting calculated correctly.
Can somebody tell me where the problem is.
Regards,
DGN 21
Edited by: dgn21 on Dec 3, 2010 6:24 AM>
dgn21 wrote:
> Dear Jeyakanthan,
>
> As explained earlier after paying to the customs through MIRO, I am doing J1IEX_C, in this transaction, the excise duty is being calculated correctly but the Assessable shown is incorrect.
> I have following condition in schema:
> Gross Price (A):
> Insurance %(B)
> Basic Landing Charges (C):
> Assessable value: (A)(B)(C)
> Basic customs Duty (D)
> CVD (E)
> Ecess on CVD (F):
> S E Cess on CVD (G):
> And then other conditions
>
> Presently the system is calculating the Assessable value as (A) + (D) {i.e. Gross price +Basic Customs duty}, but it should be (A) + (B) +(C).
> Kindly tell me where I need to do the changes so I can get the correct Assessable value as desired.
>
>
> Thanks in advance
Check import pricing procedure calculations in M/08 ? -
Hello All,
Base value for Excise duty and different service tax. calculated with the BASB condition type.
can we change the the base value pick up method.
Means i dont want to pick this value fron Net (gross price less discount).
I want to have this value from Calculated Net value with considering freight charge and less discount.
is it possible to change,
Abhinay Waikar.Hi,
Assign subtotal "5" against the freight condition types in MM calculation schema and then try. -
Excise base value ZERO in GR for STO
All SAP gurus,
I have created an STO in which my receiving plant is a depot. I have made an outbound delivery, billing and excise invoice from the supplying plant. Now when I am doing the GR through MIGO and entering the Excise Invoice no. it is showing the excise base value as zero while the BED ECS and SECESS value are flowing correctly from the EI. The system gives an error that the excise base is zero.
Can u pls suggest what can be the issue for the same.Dear Ashish Dhawan,
We are facing a similar problem and would be highly grateful if you could let us know how did the value of material from STO document type UB flow to delivery type NL.
As we are not in position to figure out where excatly the settings needs to be done to make sure the base value along with conditions of STO appears in delivery. Since the delivery value is comming zero, we are not in position to make an excise invoice for the delivery for sending plant by J1IS.
regards,
chetan. -
CIN: Alteration of base value for CST in TAXINN
Hi,
In our business process there is a requirement that CST should not be calculated only on Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) rather base value for CST should be Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) + 2 Additional Surcharges as mentioned below:
Basic Price 100.00
BED (10%) 10.00
Ecess (2%) 0.20
SEcess (1%) 0.10
Additional Surcharge1 4.00
Additional Surcharge2 6.00
Base for CST 120.30 (100100.20.14+6)
CST (2%) 2.41 (2% of 120.30)
Total Value 122.71
The tax procedure being used is TAXINN
Is there any standard routine or subtotal available so that by using this in PO Calculation Schema and TAXINN the base value of CST can be modified as desired?
Please provide some useful ideas.
Thanks in advance
Edited by: Sapdear on Aug 29, 2011 8:22 AMHi,
The additional surcharges are condition types in the calculation schema of PO whereas CST is being calculated in Tax Procedure TAXINN so how "From" and "To" functionality can work. The surcharges are getting calculated in PO Pricing and CST in tax procedure TAXINN (both at different places)
We want to use a tax code (BED10%Ecess2%SEcess1%+CST2%) to calculate Excise Duties and CST by additional surcharges taking into account.
Can any one provide some idea to resolve this issue?
Thanks in advance -
Schudling agreement with time dependent excise base value taking wrongly.
Sub: in migo excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement type LP ( time dependent ).
I have created the scheduling agreement type LP with time dependent.
I have maintained the price value in two validated period i.e
01/07/08 to 31/07/08 price is 100 rs.
01/08/08 to 31/08/08 price is 200 rs.
I have maintained the delivery schedule on
15/07/08 of quantity 1 nos.
When I am doing the goods receipts for the scheduling agreement on
Document date I am giving 15/07/08.
Posting date I am giving 15/07/08.
I am giving the posting date in the excise also 15/07/08.
After item ok.
When I will the excise base value it is taking 200 and also excise duty is also calculating on 200.
When I will post the document
The stock account and GR/IR account is taking 100 only
And excise duty is posting for rs: 200 only
Why the excise base value is not changing as per the validity period.
What setting I have to do the change the excise base value as per the validity date maintained in the time dependent .
regards
jrpHi
I was wondering in J1ID there is validity from date only no to date, Pls tell where you have maintained excise base amount based on from to period.
In J1ID if you maintain any new accesable value for the later date it will consider that.
Rgds
Srini -
Hi all,
Currently system calculating "Base Value" of Excise Invoice based on exchange rate maintained in OB08 in case of Import PO. Our requirement is "Base Value" should be calculated on the basis of exchange rate in PO.
Thanks in advancHi ,
If I change the base value of excise in MIGO(according to PO,where exchange rate is fixed) then excise BED ,AED and ECS will changed which we do not want to change.
please see base line package J83 procurement of imported materials page 15 under excise item tab ,base value is taken default by system (where ?)
kunwar -
Excise Base value wrong in MIGO
Hello ,
PB00 and some Z condition types are used in Pricing Procedure....And Excise is calculted
on the addition of PBoo+Z condition types, The BED and ECS and SECess is calculted correctly
While capturing the excise invoice in MIGO
We are using Ecc 6.0
While MIGo iam planng to capture the excise Invoice, while in Excise Invoice Tab, iam selecting
the "only Capture Excise Invoice"(In header)
In Item level Excise tab... we may see the BED.ECS,SECess and excise base value
We are getting the BED and ECS and SECESS is calculting the values correctly BUT
The Excise Base Value showing in the Base value field is wrong... why?
It is only showing the PB00 value here means PB0O value * Qty....... Here it is not giving the
addttion of Z condition types
But the BED and remaining values are calculated on PB00 and Z condition type. But why system
is taking only PB00 value in Base value tab in MIGO.
Regards
sapman manHello.
In this Z conditions are Stastical .... and We are not asigning any Account keys to them.....
In This case..... while Procurning the material for manufacturing plant..We are get the BED and ECS and SECEss are calculated on ZMRP-ZABT charges....
He re in our case the BED and ECS and SECess are correct. means it is calculated on ZMRP-ZABT charge...... But In MIGO the Base value shown is worng.... i,e is only showing us the PB00 value(means PB00 X Qty)
How to get the correct excise base value
Regards
Sapman man
Maybe you are looking for
-
My CD covers from iTunes Library are mixed up on my iPod? Why???
For some odd reason, a large part of the album artwork from my iTunes library mixed up when I loaded my iTunes library onto my iPod. In other words, when R.E.M. is playing "It's The End Of The World," the CD cover shown happens to be David Crowder Ba
-
I dont know what to do I need help to fix this, my entire life is on that thing!
-
Oracle 9.2.0.8 JDBC Driver Java 1.5
Where can I find Oracle 9.2.0.8 JDBC Driver for use with Java 1.5 ?
-
Report script execution is getting failed
Hi , We are facing one strange issue while executing the Essbase report script. I am new to the report script and I am not getting how to resolve the issue. When we are changing the year in code from FY13 to FY14 the script is getting failed however
-
Logic 9.1.4 released
Available in software update http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1014