Exclude foreign data in delivery & billing at header & item level
Dear all,
I want to stop foreign data check from my export sales scenario in delivery or in billing document, I have not done any configuration for the same. Even by deselecting check in delivery or in billing at both level Header & Item level, my billing accounting document is not getting post due to foreign data incompletion. My requriement is system should not ask to maintian any foreign data to maintain in delivery & in billing document so that my billing doc will get posted directly to accounts even when I am selling goods to abroad.
How to solve this issue, can anybody suggest in this matter.
Thanks
Regards,
Savi
If the shipping point country is different than ship-to party country, then foreign trade is activated. If you still want to switch off, then refer OSS 1459330 - Error Message: VF072 Foreign Trade Data Incomplete.
Regards,
Similar Messages
-
Delivery & Billing Block at Item level in Sales Order ( Urgent)
HI All,
I am getting delivery & Billing block at item level when I create an order with config material.
And I am unable to remove the blocks manually since they appear in display mode even in change mode of sales order.
but I could see a biiling document for this order in document flow with 0 value.
Note:
1. The item does not have any reason for rejection
2. Ther is no block set at schedule line category too.
Please give me your valid suggestion as soon as possible since it is production issue.
Thanks & RegardsHi Chandra,
Please try with this
Run VKM5 transaction with that delivery
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali. -
Delivery & Billing block at item level when I create order with config mat
HI All,
I am getting delivery & Billing block at item level when I create an order with config material.
And I am unable to remove the blocks manually since they appear in display mode even in change mode of sales order.
but I could see a biiling document for this order in document flow with 0 value.
Note:
1. The item does not have any reason for rejection
2. Ther is no block set at schedule line category too.
Please give me your valid suggestion as soon as possible since it is production issue.
Thanks & RegardsDear chandrashekar,
Goto VOV8 , select your order type - Billing - Billing block - keep this field as blank .
Second one , take the default billing type in order type (VOV8) , and Goto OVV4 and click on selection criteria and select billing type , enter your billing type and choose , you will now get the listing of that biling type and check your settings are correct.
saravanan -
Copying Header level Billing Plan to Item Level Billing Plan
Hi Gurus,
I have the following Business Scenario:
I am creating Sales Order with reference to contract. In the sales order item level detail, a check box(Copy Header level Billing Plan to item level Billing Plan) is checked. For my Business Scenario, I do not want this check.
Could you please help me in making the configuration changes to remove this check box.
Regards,
NishDear
I hope just try once
When you assign Copy Header level Billing Plan to item level Billing Plan That header level billing plan data also will come to item level it means you can change in item level
if you dont want this function in item level -- Billing plan ..Just remove the check box
Then you cant find please try it and let me know
Thanks a lot
venu -
Why should we load header data first and then we load item level data?
Hi BW guru`s,
I have small confusion about the data loading.
Why should we load header data first and then we load item level data?
Is there any particular reason?
Scenario: 1st I have uploaded 2LIS_11_VAHDR sales document header data from R/3 to BW by using LO-Cockpit extraction. Then I loaded 2LIS_11_VAITM.This is the norma procedure which we use to follow.
I have a question. If I load 2LIS_11_VAITM data 1st from R/3 to BW and then I will load 2LIS_11_VAHDR by using LO-Cockpit extraction. what will happen?
Regards,
Venkat
Edited by: VENKAT BOORUGADDA on Aug 12, 2008 11:51 AMThere is no difference in doing it the other way.
The load sequence will come into play only during activation where if you map the same fields from the two datasources, you might want to have the previous value overwritten by data from the next datasource.
That is when you should care about loading one datasource before the other.
To your question it is not arule that header data should come first. -
Billing document header & Item tables
Hi all
What are the CRM billing doc header & Item tables???
Thanks
Sonali1. Billing doc header table should be /1BEA/CRMB*BDH
2. Billing doc item table should be /1BEA/CRMB*BDI
indicates the missing phrase (which i have forgotten)
Go to SE16 and input the same, SAP will through up some options. -
How to place a delivery block at line item level from Inbound ORDERS IDoc?
Hi EDI/ABAP Experts,
Can anyone please tell me how to place a delivery block at line item level from Inbound ORDERS IDoc?
I tried using exit "EXIT_SAPLVEDA_001'. But there is no LIFSP field in either of XVBEP and YVBEP structures.
Can you guys throw some light. How to place a delivery block @ line item level on sales order from Inbound ORDERS IDoc.
Thanks,
Matt .Look into the Include: LVEDAF5A that is the only place where this exit is hit... double click on the Structures and look which structure has billling block field.. and use that..
FORM CUSTOMER_FUNCTION_IDOC USING IDOC_DATA.
CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION '001'
EXPORTING SEGMENT = IDOC_DATA
DVTCOMAG = VTCOMAG
DXMESCOD = IDOC_CONTRL-MESCOD
CONTRL = IDOC_CONTRL
TABLES DXBDCDATA = BDCDATA
DXVBAP = XVBAP
DXVBEP = XVBEP
DYVBEP = YVBEP
DXVBADR = XVBADR
DYVBADR = YVBADR
DXVBPA = XVBPA
DXVBUV = XVBUV
DD_FLAG_P = D_FLAG_P
DXKOMV = XKOMV
DXVEKP = XVEKP
DYVEKP = YVEKP
CHANGING DXVBAK = XVBAK
DD_FLAG_K = D_FLAG_K
EXCEPTIONS
USER_ERROR = 01.
If you are in ECC6.0 you can also use Enhancement point : INTERPRET_IDOC_ORDERS_01 SPOTS ES_SAPLVEDA. in include: LVEDAF2U -
SRM7.0 Transfer Header/item level attachments
Hi
Can somebody confirm me whether the Header/item level attachment transfer is supported in SRM7.0( for ERP EHP4 to SRM7.0)
Is there any SAP note explanining about the issue.
Pls confirm.
Regards
CkumarHi Masa
Thanks for your support before.
I have few more questions..can you please confirm.
Since Header level GOS attachment transfer is not possible without addon development effort, we need to confirm whether atleast item level attachment can be transferred from ERP to SRM7.0 in standard customizing.
I heard its not possible to transer item level also from ERP(PR) to SRM(SC) using DMS.
Can you please confirm if this possible or not.
does CPPR functionality have option to transer both Header level & item level transfer from ERP(PR) to SRM(SC).
any past experience says its possible>
pls share your experieince...
Regards
Ckumar -
Billing - Foreign Data Incomplete, Delivery to Billing
Hey Folks
I am trying to create a billing document, which is an Export Billing Document. I have maintained my Customer address in Australia. When i save my billing document, i get a message " foreign trade data incomplete" in which case i cannot transfer it to accounting. What is the solution for this. !!
Thanks in advance
Cheers
VjHi,
If you are getting this error then:
1. Go to the header of the billing document and choose foreign
trade/customs
2. Click on incompleteness analysis button which will tell you exactly
what is missing.
3. Populate the missing data. This is important if your sale is an
export.
3. Do the same procedure for the item level forieng trade data
4. Once all is complete you should be able to release the document to
accounting
If you're order is an export then most likely for instrastat
declaration purposes you will have to maintain foreign trade data.
This data can include: Export procedure, business transaction, modes of
transport etc..
Majority of this data should be pulled in automatically via the route
determination configuration and via the export group field populated in the material master record.
All foreign traded data are checked against the customizing settings.
-This enables correct processing of export and import processes.
-Export / Import Group determines the Export Procedure.
-If required permitted combination of Mode of Transport and customs office will be checked against customization, If the combination is not allowed we can control to issue a warning or error message.
-In addition we can classify Import and Export Procedures so that for imports only import procedures are there and for exports export procedures are determined.
Thanks -
Unable to change requested delivery date in the sales order at item level.
The issue is when I create order with one material (linked to network and project is created automatically in the background), I am able to change (in change mode) req delivery date for an item, but when I create order with 2 materials (linked to network and project is created automatically in the background), I can not change (in change mode) the req delivery date of any item. Req delivery date is then copied from the header req delivery date.
Is this a standard SAP functionality or a defect?Req del date is the date requested by customer and can be changed at item level. Probably the confirmed date in the schedule line is derived from the network scheduling after ATP check. (ATP check is not activated in this case)
I am able to change the req del date at item level if there is only one item (Linked to network) and not when there are two line items (Both are linked to 2 diff networks belonging to same project)
I tried to change the date in the network, scheduled and saved but that didnt change the date in the sales order. On the contrary, if I run ATP check, netowrk dates get back to original dates derived from sales order. -
Header data not getting updated in line item level
Hi,
We are trying to update Pricing date at header level but it is not gettting copied to item level.
getting an message "The header business data does not apply to item xxxx"
i have checked the item category and "business item" field is checked. and for the same sales order previously we were able to change the pricing date at header level and it got applied to item level but this time is is not getting applied.
kindly suggest.If there are multiple line items which are having different data; in your case, Pricing Date, then in that case, when you try to change at header level, system will pop up this message.
You can also have a look at the following note:-
Note 336660 - Message V1403 in sales order with article order no
G. Lakshmipathi -
Delivery address appearing at Item level and not at Header level in PO
Hello Experts,
We are facing an issue as described below:-
We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
for all the Item Levels.
However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
RKSHI Paul,
Thank you for your response.In our case even if all the Line/items level have same Plant and storage location still the delivery address is getting printed at Item level and not at Header Level and this is happening only for PO's created from PR's orginating from SRM7.0.
However if we create PR's directly in R/3 and then convert them into PO's,the delivery address is getting printed at the Header level if the delivery address is same for all the Item level.
Can you plz some insite into this?
Your help will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
RKS -
Hi all,
I am using 'REUSE_ALV_HIERSEQ_LIST_DISPLAY'. I need to display traffic lights both in header and item level. here is the piece of code I used.
DATA : e_alvly TYPE slis_layout_alv.
e_alvly-expand_fieldname = 'LIGHT'.
e_alvly-lights_fieldname = 'LIGHT'.
e_alvly-lights_tabname = 'TS_HEADER_DETAILS'.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_HIERSEQ_LIST_DISPLAY'
EXPORTING
i_callback_program = w_prog
is_layout = e_alvly
it_fieldcat = it_fieldcat
it_events = ts_events
i_tabname_header = c_ts_header_details
i_tabname_item = c_ts_item_details
is_keyinfo = key
TABLES
t_outtab_header = ts_header_details
t_outtab_item = ts_item_details.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE 'Error in ALV ' TYPE 'I'.
ENDIF.
Using this I could get traffic lights only at header level. if I replace 'TS_HEADER_DETAILS' with 'TS_ITEM_DETAILS' , i can see lights only at item level.
Insummary I can get lights eithere in Header or item level, but I need at both the levels.
Please suggest some solution to overcome this problem..
Thanks in Advance,
Vishal..H,
Have you tried this,
e_alvly-expand_fieldname = 'LIGHT'.
e_alvly-lights_fieldname = 'LIGHT'.
e_alvly-lights_tabname = 'TS_HEADER_DETAILS'.
append e_alvly-lights_tabname.
e_alvly-expand_fieldname = 'LIGHT'.
e_alvly-lights_fieldname = 'LIGHT'.
e_alvly-lights_tabname = 'TS_ITEM_DETAILS'.
append e_alvly-lights_tabname.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_HIERSEQ_LIST_DISPLAY'
EXPORTING
i_callback_program = w_prog
is_layout = e_alvly
it_fieldcat = it_fieldcat
it_events = ts_events
i_tabname_header = c_ts_header_details
i_tabname_item = c_ts_item_details
is_keyinfo = key
TABLES
t_outtab_header = ts_header_details
t_outtab_item = ts_item_details.
IF sy-subrc 0.
MESSAGE 'Error in ALV ' TYPE 'I'.
ENDIF.
hope it works,
Regards,
Abhijit G. Borkar -
Delivery address in PO item level
Hi,
in PO item level there is a tab "Delivery address". Under this tab there is a Field "Address" having data for eg. 22706.
1.Please tell me from where this "address" comes. where is the customization for this "address".
2.Delivery address, is it related to storage location in the line item.kunalc13 ,
The address number used will be maintained on PO item table EKPO. The address number it uses is determined as follows (assuming standard SAP without user exits):
Default address;
- Storage Location Address, if maintained,
- Plant Address, if maintained AND If Storage Address is not maintained,
- Company Code Address, if maintained AND if the Plant & storage location addresses are not maintained
- Blank, if none of the above have been maintained
- If you look in table ADRC, this address will be assigned to address group CA01 (Customizing address)
- Maintenance of these addresses are performed in configuration.
The user has the option to change the default address, or add a vendor number,
custom number, or address number in the fields on the right. They can only do
one of these, not a combination of them
- Manual change of an address on the address tab:
- If the address is physically changed on the screen, SAP will generate a new
address number that applies to this PO only and cannot be reused on future POs.
- In table ADRC, this address group is ME03 - One time vendor address.
- If they choose a vendor, the vendor number appears on the address tab, the address
number for that vendor will be in table EKPO, in ADRC, it will account group BP
(Business Partner)
- Maintenance of this address is performed in the Vendor Master
- If they choose a customer, the customer number appears on the address tab, the
address number for that customer will be in table EKPO, in ADRC, it will account
group BP (Business Partner)
- Maintenance of this address is performed in the Customer master
- If they choose an address number, that number appears on the address tab, and
that address number will be listed in ADRC as address group ME01 (Delivery Address)
- maintenance of these addresses are performed in transaction code MEAN -
Billing block at item level still billing is possible for the item.
Hi friends,
I have billing blocks at header and item level. When the block at the header and item levels are active no billing takes place, but if the block at header is removed then an item with a billing block is also billed. How do i stop this ? Please suggest.
Regards,
Udaynath.Rectified. It was wrong copying requirement at the item level.
Regards,
Udaynath.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Reader 10.1.4 won't print
HP 1080 printer used to print pdf docs from a win 7 64bit machine. Still prints other docs have tried installing different versions of reader. Reader print interface acts like it processes the doc but no jobs show in the printer spooler interface. S
-
I cannot get my Airport Extreme network up and running
Here's the scoop. I have two computers, a PowerMac G5 w/o an Airport card and a PowerBook G4 w/ an Airport card. I also have an Airport Extreme base station to which I would like to connect both computers on my DSL acct. The problem I have is similar
-
Error in Phase during installation Solution Manager 7.1
Dear all, when I want to install the Solution Manager 7.1 it comes an error during a installation phase. The log of the error (JAVA) is: ConfigMainExt state200 TYPE=A<BR>STATE=<BR>INFO_SHORT=com.sap.security.core.server.destinations.api.DestinationEx
-
Part of iTunes on External Hard Drive?
I have searched the discussion forums for an answer to my issue. I have an idea that may work for my issue, but want to ask before doing anything. I can only find one discussion that covers the nature of these questions and no clear answers were give
-
Removing a quote sign from data transfer
Is it possible to remove specific characters while transferring data from the PSA table to subsequent data targets? Maybe there a BW formula that enables this to happen? In my case, we have created a generic extractor to load statistical data from a