Exclusive and Group Condition

Dear Gurus,
In MM what is meaning of Exculsive in Aceess sequence and How is the use of Group Condition in condition type please explain me in simple .
Regards,
Pooja Panday

Hi,
In MM what is meaning of Exculsive in Aceess sequence and How is the use of Group Condition in condition type please explain me in simple.
Exclusive in Access sequence means system will stop searching for condition record for the condition type.
Access sequence means system will search in sequence for a particular conditon type for condition record.
Group condition.
Indicates whether the system calculates the basis for the scale value from more than one item in the document.
Here system takes into consideration for a group condition to be effective, the items must belong to a group. You can freely define the group to meet the needs of your own organization. The items can, for example, all belong to the same material group.
check in condition type details tab there is tab called group condition press F1 help on that.
Ex;
A sales order contains two items. Both items belong to the material group 01.
Material Quantity Material group
A 150 01
B 100 01
The group condition indicator is set in the definition of the condition type for material group discounts. The condition record for material group 01 includes the following pricing scale:
Scale quantity Discount
from 1 pc -1%
from 200 pc -2%
Neither item alone qualifies for the 2% discount. However, when the items are combined as part of a group condition, the combined quantity creates a basis of 250 pieces. This basis then exceeds the scale value of 200 pieces, which is necessary to qualify for the higher discount
Regards
Ravi Shankar.

Similar Messages

Condition types header condition and group condition

Hi All,
can any one tell me why the same header condition type is coming in billing document twice.The condition type has two deifferent parameters.
In first condition type:
condition class :DISCOUNT /SURCHARGE
calculation type :A percentage
condition control:A Adjust for qty variance
condition origin:A Automatic pricing
In second condition type:
condition class :DISCOUNT /SURCHARGE
calculation type :A percentage
condition control:C CHchanged manually
Condition origin:A HEADER CONDITION.
Even though only one conditon type is maintained.
Regards, Rajneesh

hi,
pl check at V/06 if you have maintained the conditon type as both header and group condition.
regards
sadhu kishore

Regarding group condition

hi friends
1.wht is header condition and group condition?
2. what r the condution types for header and group conditions?
3. give me some examples for useful of header condition and group conditon?
plz reply me
thanks in advance

Dear Venkata Ramana
1) Header Conditions
Header conditions are entered manually in order processing. Automatic pricing does not take header conditions into account; you can not create condition records for them in the standard system. R/3 includes the following header conditions:
- Percent discount (HA00)
- Absolute discount (HB00)
- Freight (HD00)
2) Group Conditions
Please check this help link
[Group Conditions |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/1c/8c8b518d8c11d199a30000e8a5bd28/frameset.htm]
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Sum based on group by and one condition

I have a tableof following structure
Group SubGroup sequence length
A x 1 10
A X
 2 20
A X 2 30
A X 3 50
B Y 4 30
B Y 5 40
I needa new column with a sum of lengths grouping Group,sub group and sequence but the condition is sum should be calculated based on the sequence of each row.Sum is sum of lengths where sequence is greater than the current row sequence number and grouping
group nad sub group
following is the output i am looking for
Group SubGroup sequence length Sum
A x 1 10 100(Sum of all the lengths where sesquence > current rows sequence
and group by group,sub
group and sequnce)
A X 2 20 50
A X 3 30 NULL
B Y 4 40 50
B Y 5 50 NULL

Please follow basic Netiquette and post the DDL we need to answer this. Follow industry and ANSI/ISO standards in your data. You should follow ISO-11179 rules for naming data elements. You should follow ISO-8601 rules for displaying temporal data. We need
to know the data types, keys and constraints on the table. Avoid dialect in favor of ANSI/ISO Standard SQL.
And you need to read and download the PDF for:
https://www.simple-talk.com/books/sql-books/119-sql-code-smells/
>> I have a table of following structure <<
Your posting is crap! Did you know that GROUP and SEQUENCE are reserved words in SQL? Did you really want to use a CREATE SEQUENCE? Did you know a table has a name and key?? That having a separate “<something>_sub_group” column is so bad a design flaw
it has a name (attribute splitting)? That “<something>_length” cannot exist without being the length of something in particular?
CREATE TABLE Rude_Postings
(rudeness_grp CHAR(2) NOT NULL
CHECK (rudeness_grp LIKE '[A-Z][A-Z]'),
foobar_seq INTEGER NOT NULL
CHECK (foobar_seq > 0),
PRIMARY KEY (rudeness_grp, foobar_seq),
foobar_length INTEGER NOT NULL
CHECK (foobar_length > 0)
The foobar_seq simply looks wrong. It was not unique, so it could not be a sequence by definition. I will guess that it is unique within a rudeness_grp.
INSERT INTO Rude_Postings
VALUES
('AX', 1, 10),
('AX', 2, 20),
('AX', 3 30),
('AX', 4, 50),
('BY', 1 , 30),
('BY', 2 , 40);
>> I need a new column with a sum of lengths grouping Group,sub group and sequence but the condition is sum should be calculated based on the sequence of each row. Sum [sic: SUM is a reserved word!] is sum of lengths where sequence is greater than the
current row [sic: tables are sets not files, so there is no ordering and no concept of a current row] sequence number and grouping group and sub group <<
Here is my guess:
SELECT rudeness_grp, foobar_seq, foobar_length
SUM( foobar_length)
OVER (PARTITION BY rudeness_grp
ORDER BY foobar_seq DESC
ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW)
AS foobar_length_running_tot
FROM Rude_Postings;
--CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking
in Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL

Transportation Group and Shipping condition fields in Route determination

Hello Guys,
Please, I heard that if I leave Transportation Group and Shipping conditions field empty Route determination would consider whatever value I put in Material/Custumer Master.
But the determination just happen if I put the exact value in either the determination and the Material Master for Transportation Group field for example.
Have you ever determined Routes leaving the fields empty?
Thank you,
Regards,

Hi,
Those fields Transportation Group and Shipping conditions available in Route Determination are essential to trigger the correct route in Sales Order level.
If blank the available routes need to be picked manually at Sales Order level.
Kindly check .
Regards,
SRK

MWST-group condition rounding difference between invoice and credit memo

Hi Experts,
I have an issue with MWST rounding issue.
Before jumping into the actual problem these are the prerequisites
SAP Version: ECC6.0
Condition type: MWST, with group condition tick enabled!
US Scenario (No Implication of CIN)
Scenario: - From Billing document  to Credit memo invoice.
When a invoice is referenced to the credit memo, there is a difference in the rounding value.
E.g.: Invoice tax value: 387.34 when completely referenced to credit memo become;s 387.31.
Please throw some light on it!

Hi,
Check Note 315792 - Group conditions of the same amount on item and related notes.
Perhaps Note 80183 - Rounding will help you too.
Regards,
Eduardo

Group condition.

Hi,
I have a requirement as below: I have a group condition(ZR09 which is scale based) which has to be calculated as follows: For every line item the net value is added and finally the condition ZR09 is applied. Now the problem is I have certain cases where the condition ZR09 is inactive(Because of exclusions). Currently the value of ZR09 is calculated based on whole line item net value.
The requirement is if for a particular line item the group condition ZR09 is inactive then the corresponding net value of the line should not be considered for calculating the group condition. I have written a scale based formula for this and assigned in the condition type. It works fine during creation of the sales order but when I add a new line item to an existing sales order the problem comes and the calculation of group condition is done based on certain other values.
Did any one faced this situation earlier. Again I think this issue can be solved by some customizing(Which I am not sure of). Can anyone suggest a work around for this?
Regards,
Murari.

Hi
See Note 315792 - Group conditions of the same amount on item. It suggest how to create a VOFM and set it in V/06 for this condition in group key routine to avoid this kind of problems.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

CRM 5.0 IPC Group Condition

Friends,
We have a requirement to implement a group condition in CRM IPC 5.0. We have it implemented in R/3 and it works fine. We have replicated the code in the IPC and it is being hit. The code is quite simple. We copy to subtotal 1 a the net line value if the condition ZDC1 exists on the line. We then want the group basis calculation to only include the totalling of those lines that had ZDC1.
As I mentioned, this works fine in R/3. In CRM it is including the value of all the lines regardless of whether there is a ZDC1 condition or not. The Java code is getting hit and doing the transfer of the value to subtotal 1 at the right time.
Is there something else we should be setting up in the custom fromula for a group condition? I see in the IMG in CRM where I can add formula and implementation attributes. Is this something I need to do to get the group condition to work correctly?
Regards.
KB

We put code in to write the condition out to a log file to ensure that the correct values were being calculated. Once we did this, the condition started working. No clue why.

New files and folders on a Linux client mounting a Windows 2012 Server for NFS share do not inherit Owner and Group when SetGID bit set

Problem statement
When I mount a Windows NFS service file share using UUUA and set the Owner and Group, and set the SetGID bit on the parent folder in a hierarchy. New Files and folders inside and underneath the parent folder do not inherit the Owner and Group permissions
of the parent.
I am given to understand from this Microsoft KnowledgeBase article (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951716/en-gb) the problem is due to the Windows implmentation of NFS Services not supporting the Solaris SystemV or BSD grpid "Semantics"
However the article says the same functionality can acheived by using ACE Inheritance in conjunction with changing the Registry setting for "KeepInheritance" to enable Inheritance propagation of the Permissions by the Windows NFS Services.
1. The Precise location of the "KeepInheritance" DWORD key appears to have "moved" in Windows Server 2012 from a Services path to a Software path, is this documented somewhere? And after enabling it, (or creating it in the previous
location) the feature seems non-functional. Is there a method to file a Bug with Microsoft for this Feature?
2. All of the references on demonstrating how to set an ACE to achieve the same result "currently" either lead to broken links on Microsoft technical websites, or are not explicit they are vague or circumreferential. There are no plain Examples.
Can an Example be provided?
3. Is UUUA compatible with the method of setting ACE to acheive this result, or must the Linux client mount be "Mapped" using an Authentication source. And could that be with the new Flat File passwd and group files in c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc
and is there an Example available.
Scenario:
Windows Server 2012 Standard
File Server (Role)
+- Server for NFS (Role) << -- installed
General --
Folder path: F:\Shares\raid-6-array
Remote path: fs4:/raid-6-array
Protocol: NFS
Authentication --
No server authentication
+- No server authentication (AUTH_SYS)
++- Enable unmapped user access
+++- Allow unmapped user access by UID/GID
Share Permissions --
Name: linux_nfs_client.host.edu
Permissions: Read/Write
Root Access: Allowed
Encoding: ANSI
NTFS Permissions --
Type: Allow
Principal: BUILTIN\Administrators
Access: Full Control
Applies to: This folder only
Type: Allow
Principal: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM
Access: Full Control
Applies to: This folder only
-- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

I'm making some "major" progress on this problem.
1. Apparently the "semantics" issue to honor SGID or grpid in NFS on the server side or the client side has been debated for some time. It also existed as of 2009 between Solaris nfs server and Linux nfs clients. The Linux community defaulted to declaring
it a "Server" side issue to avoid "Race" conditions between simultaneous access users and the local file system daemons. The client would have to "check" for the SGID and reformulate its CREATE request to specify the Secondary group it would have to "notice"
by which time it could have changed on the server. SUN declined to fix it.. even though there were reports it did not behave the same between nfs3 vs nfs4 daemons.. which might be because nfs4 servers have local ACL or ACE entries to process.. and a new local/nfs
"inheritance" scheme to worry about honoring.. that could place it in conflict with remote access.. and push the responsibility "outwards" to the nfs client.. introducing a race condition, necessitating "locking" semantics.
This article covers that discovery and no resolution - http://thr3ads.net/zfs-discuss/2009/10/569334-CR6894234-improved-sgid-directory-compatibility-with-non-Solaris-NFS-clients
2. A much Older Microsoft Knowledge Based article had explicit examples of using Windows ACEs and Inheritance to "mitigate" the issue.. basically the nfs client "cannot" update an ACE to make it "Inheritable" [-but-] a Windows side Admin or Windows User
[-can-] update or promote an existing ACE to "Inheritable"
Here are the pertinent statements -
"In Windows Services for UNIX 2.3, you can use the KeepInheritance registry value to set inheritable ACEs and to make sure that these ACEs apply to newly created files and folders on NFS shares."
"Note About the Permissions That Are Set by NFS Clients
The KeepInheritance option only applies ACEs that have inheritance enabled. Any permissions that are set by an NFS client will
only apply to that file or folder, so the resulting ACEs created by an NFS client will
not have inheritance set."
"So
If you want a folder's permissions to be inherited to new subfolders and files, you must set its permissions from the Windows NFS server because the permissions that are set by NFS clients only apply to the folder itself."
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321049
3. I have set up a Windows 2008r2 NFS server and mounted it with a Redhat Enteprise Linux 5 release 10 x86_64 server [Oct 31, 2013] and so far this does appear to be the case.
4. In order to mount and then switch user to a non-root user to create subdirectories and files, I had to mount the NFS share (after enabling Anonymous AUTH_SYS mapping) this is not a good thing, but it was because I have been using UUUA - Unmapped Unix
User Access Mapping, which makes no attempt to "map" a Unix UID/GID set by the NFS client to a Windows User account.
To verify the Inheritance of additional ACEs on new subdirectories and files created by a non-root Unix user, on the Windows NFS server I used the right click properties, security tab context menu, then Advanced to list all the ACEs and looked at the far
Column reflecting if it applied to [This folder only, or This folder and Subdirectories, or This folder and subdirectories and files]
5. All new Subdirectories and files createdby the non-root user had a [Non-Inheritance] ACE created for them.
6. I turned a [Non-Inheritance] ACE into an [Inheritance] ACE by selecting it then clicking [Edit] and using the Drop down to select [This folder, subdirs and files] then I went back to the NFS client and created more subdirs and files. Then back to the
Windows NFS server and checked the new subdirs and folders and they did Inherit the Windows NFS server ACE! - However the UID/GID of the subdirs and folders remained unchanged, they did not reflect the new "Effective" ownership or group membership.
7. I "believe" because I was using UUUA and working "behind" the UID/GID presentation layer for the NFS client, it did not update that presentation layer. It might do that "if" I were using a Mapping mechanism and mapped UID/GID to Windows User SIDs and
Group SIDs. Windows 2008r2 no longer has a "simple" Mapping server, it does not accept flat text files and requires a Schema extension to Active Directory just to MAP a windows account to a UID/GID.. a lot of overhead. Windows Server 2012 accepts flat text
files like /etc/passwd and /etc/group to perform this function and is next on my list of things to see if that will update the UID/GID based on the Windows ACE entries. Since the Local ACE take precedence "over" Inherited ACEs there could be a problem. The
Inheritance appears to be intended [only] to retain Administrative rights over user created subdirs and files by adding an additional ACE at the time of creation.
8. I did verify from the NFS client side in Linux that "Even though" the UID/GID seem to reflect the local non-root user should not have the ability to traverse or create new files, the "phantom" NFS Server ACEs are in place and do permit the function..
reconciling the "view" with "reality" appears problematic, unless the User Mapping will update "effective" rights and ownership in the "view"
-- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

Transport planning and shipping condition

What is the meaning of transport planning and shipping condition,
Please explani

Shipping Conditions (VSBED):
General shipping strategy for the delivery of goods from the vendor to the customer.
You can define shipping conditions in your system which corresponds to the requirements of your company. You can specify a shipping condition in the customer master and in the vendor master.
The loading group, the plant and the shipping condition determine the shipping point that will be proposed by the system.
Apart from the country and the geographical region of the shipping point, the ship-to party and the transportation group, the shipping condition determines the route that the system proposes in the order for the delivery of the goods. In the delivery, the route proposal also takes the weight group into account.
Transportation Planning:
Transportation Planning is part of the Transportation Planning/Vehicle Scheduling (TP/VS) application and is used for medium to long-term planning. It enables the transportation planner to optimally distribute the available capacities for trucks, trains, ships, and planes. The aim of Transportation Planning is to load capacities in the most efficient way and reduce costs. Most customers currently rely entirely on external shipping companies to carry out an optimal transportation of goods, which means that punctual and cost-effective deliveries are a high priority.
Regards,
AK
reward points if helpful

Condition exclusion between 2 condition types- Pleaase urgent

Hi gurus
Ihave some problem. please help me to configure the system.
I am giving 2 discounts and one has to excluse from other if it finds better discount.
Ex : Z001 =$5 and Z002= $6 two condition types with 2 different access sequence .(not same access sequence)
if sytem finds both I don't want to give both the discounts.
in my case how to exclude z001 because z002 is better price.
Thanks
Prasad

Condition Exclusion:
 Conditions can be linked to requirements in the pricing procedure.
 A requirement can evaluate the condition exclusion indicator and ignore the condition if set.
 The condition exclusion indicator can be set in either the condition type or the condition record.
 You may create your own exclusion indicators and test for their existence in the requirement routines.
Process Steps for Condition Exclusion:
1. Changing customer-specific prices:
Menu path:
Logistics  Sales and Distribution  Master Data  Conditions  Select using condition type  Change
Choose condition type PR00.
Choose the key combination Customer/Material with release status.
Select the condition line and click the Details button.
Enter X in the Exclusion field.
Save your changes.
2. Creating a standard order:
Menu path:
Logistics  Sales and Distribution  Sales  Order  Create
3. The conditions after condition PR00, which have requirement 2 assigned to them in the pricing procedure, are not taken into account during pricing. For example, this technique can be used when discounts and surcharges are not supposed to affect the net price.
Menu path:
Select the line item and click the Item conditions button.
Click the Analysis button at the bottom of the screen.
4. Removing the exclusion indicator:
Menu path:
Logistics  Sales and Distribution  Master Data  Conditions  Select using condition type  Change
Choose condition type PR00.
Choose the key combination Customer/Material with release status.
Select the condition line and click the Details button.
Remove the exclusion indicator.
Save your changes.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward points if helpful.

Shipment Cost: Group Condition Type calculated on a special weight...

Here is the scenario: A shipment (truck) combines multiple deliveries, grouped on a stage when same destination (happens often).
A condition per LB is to be calculated on the cumulated weight per destination (per stage) BUT not simply on the gross weight, but on the heavier of 2 special weights: the business here uses a special formula according to the packaging, and it gives 2 weights (stored in Z fields of LIKP), an actual weight and a cubic weight.
The purpose is to identify for each delivery the heavier weight and to use cumulated the weight across the deliveries to the same destination to calculate the per CWT cost.
This is my first issue: the condition type is defined at Delivery calculation base, Calculation Type Multi-dimensional, and as a group condition). How do I define to use the cumulated of each delivery heavier weight ? In the Scale for condition type view, I used the scale basis D Gross Weight (which is not right..), there is also a field for a Scale Base Value formula, I wondered if that is what I should use..
My 2d issue: once the cost is calculated, I have to re-distribute it on the deliveries as per the proportion of their heavier weight compared to the total weight used for the calculationShould that be an alternate Condition Base Value formula in the pricing procedure (where xkwert would be.the heavier weight.would that be then a new Z field to be filled in by the user exit determing the heavier value) ??
Thanks a lot, it is a tough one, I know...who is the best ever shipment cost pricing consultant ? !

Hi Guys
Unfortunately I do not think that you will get an answer now. Either your question is not simple or we do not know.
So in the interest of keeping the Forum tidy and easier to surf through could you please close your thread and either try one of the other forums or try another post. I do not think that most people will bother to look this far back anymore.
Sorry I cannot help as I would if I could.
Regards
Frenchy.

Get Delivery date(EKET-EINDT) in MM Pricing routine(group condition)

Hi All,
I have created an MM pricing routine RV65A092 in VOFM. So when creating PO(ME21n), this routine will trigger..
Now the problem is I need EKET-EINDT for grouping condition. It was mentioned to call program SAPLMEPO and get EKET data.
Please help me how to get delivery date in that routine which is filled in Item level during PO creation
Thanks
Ram

Hi Ram,
For SD you have the SAP Note 531835 - Using field PSTYV in the condition access. For MM is simmilar, although you must use the enahncements. Instead use the userexits that note says, use the enhancement LMEKO001 (EXIT_SAPLMEKO_001) to populate fields ZZ in KOMK and LMEKO002 to populate KOMP.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Set up pricing - Group condition doesnt works

Hi Gurus,
Please provide me your inputs.
Can SAP determine the sales price as described in the below two cases.
Case 1:
Sales price for material M1, from 01.01.2011 u2013 31.07.2011
Quantity         Price
0                         100
25      90
100      75
Sales price for material M1, from 01.08.2011 u2013 31.12.9999
Quantity      Price
0      105
25      94
100      78
Sales order (note the difference in pricing date)
Total quantity = 38, second scale should be used
Item      Material      Pricing date      Quantity      Price
10      M1      31.07.2011      17      90
20      M1      31.08.2011      21      94
Many Thanks for your answers
Sharan

Dear Sumanth,
Thanks a lot for your answer. I am relatively new to this subject. Please elaborate your answer for me to maintain the settings in copy control.
The scenario is - New condition type ZPR0 is created with group condition. And the scales are maintained as mentioned in the problem.
Lets say Order is created on date - 23/11/2011 with two lines
Line 1 - Material M1 - Quantity 17 - Pricing date 31.07.2011(Maintained at item level)
Line 2 - Material M1 - Quantity 21 - Pricing date 31.08.2011(Maintained at item level)
With scales maintained, because of the pricing date , system picks up individual scales and it doesnt accumulates the quantity. How to tell system to accumulate quantity and then check scale based on the pricing date.
Thanks for your help again,
Sharan

How to learn to extract data and group it

I recently met a guy who is looking to employ some folks. He got in touch with me in LinkedIn. I have done my research and I know he’s a real guy looking for people. I would like to get the job despite of the poor work conditions but I just feel the fear of failing or not being capable to do the job.
I know I have to try and it will be great if some of you could give some advice on how to do the job or how can I self-learn this. I'm ready to read books and follow instructions. Last year, I did a DBA internship so, I’m familiar with PL/SQL but I didn’t cover information on how to programme or gather data.
Here’s bit of the job information: "The work is to programme in PL/SQL to extract data and group it. You will learn how to make indexes and work with massive data. You will learn about programming performance in PL-SQL to extract data".
I have translated the job info from Spanish to English so, I hope you can get what I’m actually looking for. For the ones that can speak Spanish, this is what the guy wrote: "El trabajo es programar en PL/SQL para extraer datos y centralizarlos. Va a aprender a realizar índices y trabajar con datos masivos. Va a aprender mucho sobre performance de programación en PL-SQL para extraer datos".
Thanks! Gracias!
Edited by: 2learnOracle on 25-Jan-2013 16:12

Hi chaituatp,
For this requirement, I would suggest you to get familiar with how to create VSTO applications, and how SharePoint object model works. Here are some sample code about this:
How to: Retrieve List Items using JavaScript:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh185007(v=office.14).aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ee534956(v=office.14).aspx
VSTO application show data in datagridview:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16926275/simple-example-of-vsto-excel-using-a-worksheet-as-a-datasource
Thanks,
Qiao
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Qiao Wei
TechNet Community Support

Exclusive and Group Condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for