Execute time veri high

please consider followng SQL
SELECT EVENT_AMT,BILL_REF_NUM
FROM
DCEM WHERE DC_B2KID=:B2 AND EVENT_TYPE = 'B' AND EVENT_SRL_NUM =:B1
this DCEM has 400K records .It has unique index on DC_B2KID,EVENT_TYPE and EVENT_SRL_NUM .I touched every column but it takes 98% of CPU time
I executed tkprof too
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 106 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
Fetch 106 66.89 104.90 1126473 1503822 0 0
total 213 66.89 104.91 1126473 1503822 0 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: RULE
Parsing user id: 10 (TBAADM) (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
0 TABLE ACCESS FULL DC_EVENTS_TABLE
Rows Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT GOAL: RULE
0 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'DC_EVENTS_TABLE'
0 INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'IDX_DC_EVENTS_TABLE' (UNIQUE)
please find me where is the problem

Please consider how to post a tuning request...
When your query takes too long ...
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting

Similar Messages

  • High GUI Time - Causing high Response time

    Hi All,
    Average GUI Response time is approx 400 ms in my ECC 6.0 system, OS - HP UX, Database - Oracle 10.2.0.5.
    I expect it should always be approx 200 ms, but as it is high it is contibuting to high overall response time.
    I expect there are normally two ways of high GUI time :
    1)  High network time between Presentation layer( User System) and Application Layer(SAP Server).
    2) High amount of time in Loading User Screen
    For Option 2 I have checked we are using SAP access menu so there should not any problem with loading of User Access Menu.
    Average Response time for session_manager is 2 Secs.
    Please suggest me what all other ways available to improve GUI time,
    Can there be other reasons of high GUI time and how can we make sure that high GUI time is only because of high Network time.
    Please suggest.
    Shivam

    I believe in case you have multiple roundtrips per step, then the client performance comes into play as well. So if you have slow clients this could be an issue too.
    Basically you are already looking in the right place (network connection), but i recommend you also check:
    - roundtrips per step and amount of data sent to the client
    - are all transactions having high gui times, or only a few?
    - how is the situation on the clients?
    - if you have clients working on prod and qas check the values on the qas system too
    Cheers Michael

  • Please advise what is the query to identify a SQL executed time

    Hi all
    Please advise what is the query to identify a SQL executed time.
    eg, a DML executed at 16-Apr-2013 11:45hrs

    Try like..
    select LAST_LOAD_TIME, ELAPSED_TIME, MODULE, SQL_TEXT elasped from v$sql order by LAST_LOAD_TIME desc

  • How can i get the executing time of a IMAQ function.function could be IMAQ acquire IMAQ acquire.

    how can i get the executing time of a IMAQ function.function could be IMAQ acquire IMAQ acquire.

    Hello,
    This question was answered under a different category, here is the link:
    http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RHIVEID=101&RPAGEID=137&HOID=5065000000050000004EBA0000&HTHREAD=000047694&UCATEGORY_0=_15_&UCATEGORY_S=0
    Regards
    Russell B.
    National Instruments
    Applications Engineering
    Engineering Team Leader
    G Systems, www.gsystems.com
    Certified LabVIEW Architect
    Certified Professional Instructor

  • Load+gen time very high

    Hi all
    i m using SAP 4.7 on Oracle 9.2
    Server- IBM P series Processor 375Mhzx 2 RAM - 3 GB
    I hav problem that in ST03n i have Load +Gen time very high (upto 500)
    is it some H/w problem or some tuning prob.
    Thanks in Advance

    SGEN will recompile ABAP loads that you want.
    your system look old, so, this can take anything from 1 hour to 8 hours.
    so, do this when user load is minimal.
    I usually choose all options and do a complete generation. this takes a lot of space in your DB, but system will be faster even if you use rarely used transactions.

  • Test program running taking much more time on high end server T5440 than low end server  T5220

    Hi all,
    I have written the following program and run on both T5440  [1.4 GHz, 95 GB RAM, 32 cores(s), 256 logical (virtual) processor(s),] and  T5220 [(UltraSPARC-T2 (chipid 0, clock 1165 MH) , 8GB RAM, 1 core, 8 virtual processors )] on same OS version.  I found that T5540 server takes more time than T5220. Please find below the details.
    test1.cpp
    #include <iostream>
    #include <pthread.h>
    using namespace std;
    #define NUM_OF_THREADS 20
    struct ABCDEF {
    char A[1024];
    char B[1024];
    void *start_func(void *)
        long long i = 6000;
        while(i--)
                    ABCDEF*             sdf = new ABCDEF;
                    delete sdf;
                    sdf = NULL;
        return NULL;
    int main(int argc, char* argv[])
        pthread_t tid[50];
        for(int i=0; i<NUM_OF_THREADS; i++)
                    pthread_create(&tid[i], NULL, start_func, NULL);
                    cout<<"Creating thread " << i <<endl;
        for(int i=0; i<NUM_OF_THREADS; i++)
                    pthread_join(tid[i], NULL);
                    cout<<"Waiting for thread " << i <<endl;
    After executing the above program on T5440 takes :
    real 0.78
    user 3.94s
    sys 0.05
    After executing the above program on T5220 takes :
    real 0.23
    user 1.43s
    sys 0.03
    It seems that T5440 which is high end server takes almost 3 times more time than T5220 which is low end server.  
    However, I have one more observation. I tried the following program :
    test2.cpp
    #include <iostream>
    #include <pthread.h>
    using namespace std;
    #define NUM_OF_THREADS 20
    struct ABCDEF {
    char A[1024];
    char B[1024];
    int main(int argc, char* argv[])
        long long i = 6000000;
        while(i--)
            ABCDEF*  sdf = new ABCDEF;
            delete sdf;
            sdf = NULL;
        return 0;
    It seems that T5440 server is fast in this case as compaired to T5220 server.
    Could anyone please help me out the exact reason for this behaviour as my application is slow as well on this T5440 server. I have posted earlier as well for the same issue. 
    Thanks in advance !!!
    regards,
    Sanjay

    You already asked this question...
    48 hours earlier, and in the same Solaris forum space
    Repeating the post isn't going to get you a response any faster, and actually now have people NOT respond because you are not showing any patience.
    These are end-user community forums, not a place to expect Oracle Technical Support.   There is no obligation that there be a response.
    If you have a business-critical issue and hope to get accurate and timely response, then use your service contract credentials to open a Support request.
    This new redundant post is locked.
    Edit:
    It appears that at the same time the O.P. posted this redundant thread, they also posted the same question to at least one other forum web site:
    http://www.unix.com/solaris/229269-test-program-running-taking-much-more-time-high-end-server-t5440-than-low-end-server-t5220.html

  • Cpu time is high

    In the below statspack report CPU time is very high.....how to voercome this prole....is there any other problem also pls suggest me.
    OS:SUN Solris
    DB=Oracle 9.2.0.6
    STATSPACK report for
    DB Name         DB Id    Instance     Inst Num Release     Cluster Host
    ICAI          1372079993 icai12              2 9.2.0.6.0   YES     icai2
                  Snap Id     Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess Comment
    Begin Snap:        11 12-Sep-08 13:55:54      931       7.2
      End Snap:        12 12-Sep-08 17:04:24      623       7.4
       Elapsed:              188.50 (mins)
    Cache Sizes (end)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                   Buffer Cache:     2,512M      Std Block Size:          8K
               Shared Pool Size:       608M          Log Buffer:        977K
    Load Profile
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~                            Per Second       Per Transaction
                      Redo size:              1,026.01              8,844.68
                  Logical reads:              4,270.92             36,817.17
                  Block changes:                  5.28                 45.55
                 Physical reads:                243.47              2,098.82
                Physical writes:                  0.41                  3.52
                     User calls:                 37.58                323.93
                         Parses:                  5.82                 50.19
                    Hard parses:                  0.31                  2.65
                          Sorts:                  2.59                 22.29
                         Logons:                  0.07                  0.58
                       Executes:                 17.69                152.49
                   Transactions:                  0.12
      % Blocks changed per Read:    0.12    Recursive Call %:     41.69
    Rollback per transaction %:   25.61       Rows per Sort:    100.12
    Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                Buffer Nowait %:  100.00       Redo NoWait %:    100.00
                Buffer  Hit   %:   94.30    In-memory Sort %:    100.00
                Library Hit   %:   98.28        Soft Parse %:     94.72
             Execute to Parse %:   67.09         Latch Hit %:     99.93
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %:   54.11     % Non-Parse CPU:     99.75
    Shared Pool Statistics        Begin   End
                 Memory Usage %:   90.81   89.84
        % SQL with executions>1:   51.49   48.75
      % Memory for SQL w/exec>1:   52.77   51.31
    Top 5 Timed Events
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                                                     % Total
    Event                                               Waits    Time (s) Ela Time
    CPU time                                                       20,029    75.44
    global cache cr request                           873,734       1,904     7.17
    db file scattered read                            346,161       1,577     5.94
    db file sequential read                           173,543       1,558     5.87
    db file parallel read                              14,902         616     2.32

    Sorry for being late....
    I think there is only one or two query causing problem....is it true that if there is only one or two query causing problem that is if the query is taking near about 30% elaspsed time cpu does it have a impact on the performance of the db......
    SQL ordered by Reads for DB: ICAI  Instance: icai12  Snaps: 11 -12
    -> End Disk Reads Threshold:      1000
                                                         CPU      Elapsd
    Physical Reads  Executions  Reads per Exec %Total Time (s)  Time (s) Hash Value
          1,097,317           11       99,756.1   39.8   386.68   1778.96 1585476974
    SELECT NVL(TO_CHAR(A.DEH_APPLICATION_DT,'DD/MM/RRRR'), NULL ),NV
    L(TO_CHAR(A.DEH_DT,'DD/MM/RRRR'), NULL )   FROM OT_DAK_ENTRY_HEA
    D A,OT_DAK_ENTRY_DETL B,OT_FIRM_NAME_APPR_HEAD C  WHERE A.DEH_SY
    S_ID = B.DED_DEH_SYS_ID  AND B.DED_DAK_SYS_ID = C.FNAH_DED_SYS_I
    D  AND C.FNAH_SYS_ID =  (SELECT MAX(B.FNAH_SYS_ID)   FROM OT_FIR
            407,436            6       67,906.0   14.8   122.60    720.09 1414719916
    UPDATE OM_MEM_REG_HEAD SET MRH_MRN=:b1 WHERE MRH_SYS_ID = :b2
            407,436            6       67,906.0   14.8   122.54    720.00 1414796677
    UPDATE OT_DAK_ACTV_HISTORY SET DAH_REG_NO = :B1 WHERE DAH_REG_NO
    = :B3 AND TRUNC(DAH_ACTV_ED_DT ) <= TRUNC(:B2 ) AND DAH_ACTV_ST
    ATUS = 'C'
            288,612           23       12,548.3   10.5    61.05    312.13 3146526985
    Module: JDBC Thin Client
    BEGIN PACK_INSERT_INTERNET_TEST.IT_INSERT_MEM_ADD_CHG_REQ(:1,:2,
    :3,:4,:5,:6,:7,:8,:9,:10,:11,:12,:13); END;
            110,742            1      110,742.0    4.0    35.17    172.63 1517630850
    SELECT NVL(TO_CHAR(A.DEH_APPLICATION_DT,'DD/MM/RRRR'), NULL ),NV
    L(TO_CHAR(A.DEH_DT,'DD/MM/RRRR'), NULL )   FROM OT_DAK_ENTRY_HEA
    D A,OT_DAK_ENTRY_DETL B,OM_FIRM_OPENCLOSE_SO C  WHERE A.DEH_SYS_
    ID = B.DED_DEH_SYS_ID  AND B.DED_DAK_SYS_ID = C.FSO_DED_SYS_ID
    AND C.FSO_SYS_ID =  (SELECT MAX(B.FSO_SYS_ID)   FROM OM_FIRM_OPE
             90,155          104          866.9    3.3   255.47    986.07 4142254844
    SELECT LTRIM(RTRIM(DECODE(TIT_NAME,'MR.','CA.','MS.','CA.','MRS.
    ','CA.') || ' '  || MRH_FIRST_NAME  || ' '  || MRH_MIDDLE_NAME
    || ' '  || MRH_SUR_NAME  || ' '  || DECODE(MRH_APPR_UID, NULL ,
    NULL ,DECODE(MRH_MEM_STATUS,2, NULL ,DECODE(MRH_FELLOW_STATUS_YN
    ,'Y','FCA','ACA')))  || DECODE(MRH_RESI_STATUS,'A','
             82,002            1       82,002.0    3.0   121.61    459.95 2335688323
    SELECT 'X'   FROM OV_APPROVED_DOCUMENTS  WHERE APPR_DOC_TXN_CODE
    = :b1  AND APPR_DOC_NO = :b2  AND EXISTS  (SELECT 'X'   FROM OT
    DAKENTRY_HEAD A,OT_DAK_ENTRY_DETL B,OM_DAK C  WHERE A.DEH_SYS_
    ID = B.DED_DEH_SYS_ID  AND A.DEH_SYS_ID = APPR_DOC_SYS_ID  AND C
    .DAK_TXN_CODE = :b3  AND C.DAK_CHANGE_TYPE IN ( 'F'  ) AND B.DED
             65,494           12        5,457.8    2.4    23.18    137.86 3958290687
    SELECT MEP_DOC_STATUS   FROM OT_MEM_EMPLOYMENT  WHERE MEP_REF_SY
    S_ID = :b1  AND MEP_REF_FROM = 'MG'
             60,028            3       20,009.3    2.2    12.59    157.78 2405844617
    Module: JDBC Thin Client
    INSERT INTO IT_ADD_DTL (ADD_DT_ACK_NO, ADD_DT_SR_NO, ADD_DT_MRN,
    ADD_DT_TYPE, ADD_DT_LINE1, ADD_DT_LINE2, ADD_DT_LINE3, ADD_DT_L
    INE4, ADD_DT_CITY_CODE, ADD_DT_OTHER_CITY, ADD_DT_PIN_CODE, ADD_
    DT_TEL, ADD_DT_EMAIL, ADD_DT_OP_DT, ADD_DT_CL_DT, ADD_DT_CL_YN,
    ADD_DT_INCHG_MRN, ADD_CORR_DT_LINE1, ADD_CORR_DT_LINE2, ADD_CORR
             60,022            6       10,003.7    2.2    12.31    155.97 3242469259
    SQL ordered by Reads for DB: ICAI  Instance: icai12  Snaps: 11 -12
    -> End Disk Reads Threshold:      1000
    SQL ordered by Gets for DB: ICAI  Instance: icai12  Snaps: 11 -12
    -> End Buffer Gets Threshold:     10000
    -> Note that resources reported for PL/SQL includes the resources used by
       all SQL statements called within the PL/SQL code.  As individual SQL
       statements are also reported, it is possible and valid for the summed
       total % to exceed 100
                                                         CPU      Elapsd
      Buffer Gets    Executions  Gets per Exec  %Total Time (s)  Time (s) Hash Value
         12,271,784           58      211,582.5   25.4   484.35   1453.46   17574787
    SELECT /*+ INDEX (OM_COURSE_FEE OCF_CFC_CODE)  */DISTINCT CF_COU
    RSE_CODE   FROM OM_COURSE_FEE,OT_STUDENT_FEE_COL_HEAD,OT_STUDENT
    FEECOL_DETL  WHERE SFCH_SYS_ID = SFCD_SFCH_SYS_ID  AND SFCD_FE
    E_TYPE_CODE = CF_TYPE_CODE  AND CF_COURSE_CODE IN ( 'PE1','PE2',
    'CCT','CPT'  ) AND SFCH_TXN_CODE = :b1  AND SFCD_SUBSCRBE_JOURNA
          7,064,924          120       58,874.4   14.6   102.74    226.01 3102119461
    SELECT ROWID,AR_DT,AR_TXN_CODE,AR_NO,AR_AMD_NO,AR_REF_FROM,AR_RE
    F_TXN_CODE,AR_REF_NO,AR_DAK_CODE,AR_DED_SYS_ID,AR_COMP_CODE,AR_A
    CNT_YR,AR_AMD_DT,AR_AMD_UID,AR_AMD_RES_CODE,AR_REF_SYS_ID,AR_STU
    D_SRN,AR_APPL_DT,AR_ISSUE_DT,AR_ENROL_FRM_COURSE,AR_ENROL_DT,AR_
    JOURNAL_YN,AR_TYPE,AR_TITLE,AR_VACANCY_CODE,AR_MRH_MRN,AR_INDUST

  • Why elapsed time is high in Partitioned table ?

    HI All,
    I executed two cases, where I update a col of partition and non partitioned table, but the complete elapsed time is quite high in partition table. I am going to paste my findings on the board.
    update test_partcodes set codetype = 'A'
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          5          0           0
    Execute      1     36.65      82.90      16982        367    3554469     3476353
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2     36.65      82.91      16982        372    3554469     3476353
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      PX Deq: Join ACK                                4        0.00          0.00
      PX Deq: Parse Reply                             4        0.09          0.16
      PX Deq: Execute Reply                          61        0.07          0.18
      db file sequential read                     16982        0.57         41.57
      log file switch completion                     27        0.57          1.76
      PX Deq: Signal ACK                              5        0.10          0.10
      enqueue                                         2        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message to client                       2        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                     2        8.12          8.13
      SQL*Net break/reset to client                   2        0.00          0.00
    update test_partcode_partition set codetype = 'A'
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1    105.34     182.91      13334    2637470    8409866     2899525
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2    105.34     182.91      13334    2637470    8409866     2899525
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      rdbms ipc reply                                 2        0.00          0.00
      enqueue                                         2        1.28          1.28
      PX Deq: Join ACK                                5        0.00          0.00
      PX Deq: Parse Reply                             4        0.26          0.31
      PX Deq: Execute Reply                        2464        0.17          1.50
      log buffer space                              163        0.28          2.27
      log file switch completion                     75        0.41          3.04
      db file sequential read                     13333        0.67         59.54
      PX Deq: Signal ACK                              8        0.10          0.32
      SQL*Net message to client                       1        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                     1        0.00          0.00
    Also, you can check explain plan
    test_staging@CHRYSLER> explain plan for update test_partcodes set codetype = 'A' ;
    Explained.
    test_staging@CHRYSLER> @plan
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id  | Operation            |  Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  |  TQ    |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
    |   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT     |                 |  3476K|  6789K|   410 |        |      |            |
    |   1 |  UPDATE              | TEST_PARTCODES  |       |       |       |        |      |            |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL  | TEST_PARTCODES  |  3476K|  6789K|   410 | 37,00  | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    test_staging@CHRYSLER> explain plan for update test_partcode_partition set codetype = 'A' ;
    Explained.
    test_staging@CHRYSLER> @plan
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id  | Operation            |  Name                    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  | Pstart| Pstop |  TQ    |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
    |   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT     |                          |  1159K|  3397K|   342 |       |       |     | |            |
    |   1 |  UPDATE              | TEST_PARTCODE_PARTITION  |       |       |       |       |       |     | |            |
    |   2 |   PARTITION RANGE ALL|                          |       |       |       |     1 |    12 | 38,00  | PCWP |            |
    |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL | TEST_PARTCODE_PARTITION  |  1159K|  3397K|   342 |     1 |    12 | 38,00  | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    Note: cpu costing is offhare krishna
    Alok

    Sorry for incomplete info, Now I am pasting the DDL, which I used to create a Partition Table.
    create table test_partcode_partition
    Partition by range (codetype)
    ( PARTITION part_2 VALUES LESS THAN ('C'),
    PARTITION part_3 VALUES LESS THAN ('E'),
    PARTITION part_4 VALUES LESS THAN ('F'),
    PARTITION part_5 VALUES LESS THAN ('L'),
    PARTITION part_6 VALUES LESS THAN ('M'),
    PARTITION part_7 VALUES LESS THAN ('O'),
    PARTITION part_8 VALUES LESS THAN ('R'),
    PARTITION part_9 VALUES LESS THAN ('T'),
    PARTITION part_10 VALUES LESS THAN ('X'),
    PARTITION part_11 VALUES LESS THAN ('Y'),
    PARTITION part_12 VALUES LESS THAN ('Z'),
    PARTITION PM VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE))
    nologging parallel
    as
    select * from mxm_partcodes ;
    DB VERSION - 9.2.0.5.0
    OS - WIn 2003 Server.
    hare krishna
    Alok

  • Issue with Query OLAP time very high

    Hello Guyz
    I ran my query in RSRT, and noticed tht the QOLAPTIME was almost 432 seconds (the query had crossed the 65556 records limit by then). The DBTIME was 70 secs.
    1. Are the above times in seconds?
    2. What are the performance techs I can implement, to improve the OLAP time? Since I think aggregates, indexing and partitioning only improve the DB time?
    3. I already have cache active on this query.
    Any suggestions?
    Please don't post the same question across the different forums
    Edited by: Moderator on Jul 8, 2009 11:46 AM

    Hello,
    One more thing, do any of the standard tech. of Indexing, Partitioning, Aggregate creation help in decreasing the OLAP time?
    These tech will be helpful for DB time but no use for OLAP time. And RKF didn't cost extra OLAP time but CKF and CELL calculation do.
    In your post you said there are more than 65535 rows. That's the main cause of high OLAP time according to my experience. Why users want so many rows? It's almost impossible to read. You can imaging how long it would take to transfer so many data from bw server to user (result in high OLAP time).
    Please reduce the lines by filter or something else. If you can't reduce the line number, I don't think the OLAP time would be low.
    Regards,
    Frank

  • Database performance: avg. DB time is high

    My system is ECC6, MSSQL 2005 64 bit.
    I got a ERA report from my solution manager and it showed that we had a performance problem.
    Our performance overview is red because of the database performance.
    The avg. DB time in ms is 2768890,3. It's very high.
    Could you please help us on this issue?
    Leo

    Hai,
    There might number of reasons for high DB time.
    Check your I/O statistics, check your table structure, create Indexes if needed for efficient table access.
    You can schedule Optimize statistics in DB13 to get the statistics upto date which helps DB to get the best possible way to access data from your DB.
    Analyse the DB buffers and adjust them to get optimal performance. (Should be done by experienced DB admins).
    Check the below links....
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/f2/31add7810c11d288ec0000e8200722/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/f2/31add7810c11d288ec0000e8200722/frameset.htm
    You can also take help from SAP to analyze your case.
    Regards,
    Yoganand.V

  • How to find the Executed time of query

    hi,
       i want to find out the execution time of query like a sales report executed in 10 min. how to find out that? is there is any TC for that or what is the option to use that?
    and how to fing out execution time of Data source to info providers.. or DSOs to IC? like how much time taken to load data?
    regards,
    preety

    Hello Preety,
          Goto RSRT give the query name and see the technical property you will find the query generation time.
    For the time taken for execution Select the execute and debug mode in the options select display statistics.
    Execute the query
    Click back
    You can see the statistics.
    Thanks
    Chandran

  • Report execute time nd how many records will be returned before hitting the "run" option?

    Post Author: Prasad15
    CA Forum: WebIntelligence Reporting
    Is there any way to know how long the report executes and how many records will be returned before hitting the "run" option?
    Regards
    Prasad

    To know if the report is going to return more than 10,000 records, you first have to run the query with a 'select count(1) from ... where ...' (with the same from and where clauses as you normal query). Since this takes about the same time as runnng your report, I wonder if you really gain anything (although formatting may take some time too).
    You may simplify the select count(1) query by omitting all the lookup tables that are only needed for formatting. That way your query may run a lot faster. You can put this in your after parameter form trigger.

  • Form display time very high

    Hi!!
    i have developed a form both in Oracle 3.0.7 and 3.0.8 and in this last the same form the display time is more high than in the previous version. It needs at least 20 seconds to display the form. And the machine in with i have the new version is more powerfull 2 processor and 512 RAM. Could i do something to improve the display time??
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    This is the bug in Portal 3.0.8 form component, u have to create two additional index, for which script is given below.
    Create 2 additional indexes:
    CREATE INDEX WWA_MODULE_BINDINGS_IDX1
    ON WWA_MODULE_BINDINGS$(
    SUBSCRIBER_ID,
    MODULE_ID,
    MODULE_VERSION,
    MODULE_BLOCK_ID,
    MODULE_ATTR_ID)
    CREATE INDEX WWA_MODULE_LOV_BINDINGS_IDX1
    ON WWA_MODULE_LOV_BINDINGS$(
    SUBSCRIBER_ID,
    MODULE_ID,
    MODULE_VERSION,
    MODULE_BLOCK_ID,
    MODULE_ATTR_ID)
    rgds,
    Sunil
    null

  • Database Request time is high dialog instance

    Dear All,
    I'm facing a problem where programs running on application server is 10X slower than CIDB. Analyzed the STAD data and the database request time is very high for program running on application server as compared to CIDB.
    Below error message found in dev_ms:
    Mon Sep 14 22:36:11 2009
    ERROR => MsHttpClient: H7 MsHttpRecMsg failed (NIECONN_BROKEN) [msxxhttp_mt. 739]
    Tue Sep 15 22:49:24 2009
    ERROR => MsHttpClient: H7 MsHttpRecMsg failed (NIECONN_BROKEN) [msxxhttp_mt. 739]
    Tue Sep 15 22:49:26 2009
    ERROR => MsHttpClient: H7 MsHttpRecMsg failed (NIECONN_BROKEN) [msxxhttp_mt. 739]
    Tue Sep 15 22:49:28 2009
    ERROR => MsHttpClient: H7 MsHttpRecMsg failed (NIECONN_BROKEN) [msxxhttp_mt. 739]
    Is this indicated some network problem between DB to application server? Also, 10% of packet loss happened when ping from apps server to DB server.
    Besides network problem,  what's the possibility that causing this problem?
    Any help is appreciated.
    Cheers,
    Nicholas Chang.

    Thanks
    Besides that, Both applications are running on HPUX 11.23 64bit and found out error message below happened frequently on DB server and Application instance. Is there any OS parameter should i look into?
    Sep 15 22:49:24 SAPHRHPDB01 inetd[2031]: echo/tcp: accept: No buffer space available
    Sep 15 22:49:24 SAPHRHPDB01 inetd[2031]: chargen/tcp: accept: No buffer space available
    Sep 15 22:49:24 SAPHRHPDB01 inetd[2031]: daytime/tcp: accept: No buffer space available
    Sep 15 22:49:24 SAPHRHPDB01 inetd[2031]: auth/tcp: accept: No buffer space available
    Sep 15 22:49:24 SAPHRHPDB01 inetd[2031]: telnet/tcp: accept: No buffer space available
    Sep 15 22:49:24 SAPHRHPDB01 inetd[2031]: ftp/tcp: accept: No buffer space available
    Sep 15 22:49:24 SAPHRHPDB01 inetd[2031]: swat/tcp: accept: No buffer space available
    Sep 15 22:49:24 SAPHRHPDB01 inetd[2031]: printer/tcp: accept: No buffer space available
    Sep 15 22:49:24 SAPHRHPDB01 inetd[2031]: shell/tcp: accept: No buffer space available
    Sep 15 22:49:24 SAPHRHPDB01 inetd[2031]: login/tcp: accept: No buffer space available
    Sep 15 22:49:24 SAPHRHPDB01 sshd[1897]: error: accept: No buffer space available

  • Execute time is 1.47. how can i speed up?

    OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 3 0.00 1.47 0 97 107 3
    Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    total 4 0.00 1.47 0 97 107 3
    oracle connection 600.
    1 row per 1 connection is inserted for 3 times.

    If there are triggers defined on the table, you need to analyze the triggers in details.

Maybe you are looking for

  • DW CS5 question about page layout viewed in different browsers

    Hello. I am still very new to Dreamweaver CS5 and I need help with the appearance of a new website that I have been creating. We are mac based and I'm currently using Mac OS10. The layout I have created should appear centered on the page and it conta

  • Toshiba Bulletin Board screen size shrunk!

    Hello, I have been using the Toshiba Bulletin Board with no problems until recently when I tried to open it and the screen appeared as a tiny rectangle (around 50 x 20 pixels) on the top left corner of my screen.  I can't resize it back to it's origi

  • Report with multiple query

    Hi, I want to construct a report that consists of results from a number of different queries, I was just wondering how would acheive that if APEX only allows me to return one query? Thanks Candy

  • Cap 4 output corrupted by Flash 10.3?

    I have a SCORM-packaged interactive SWF created in Cap 4 which was used last year with few problems. The course has been redistributed and now users are having problems, I suspect due to an upgrade to Flash 10,3,183,10 as this seems to be the common

  • HT5312 Hello, i want to change my password but i don't remind my security questions

    Hello, i want to change my password but i don't remind my security questions Can you help me please