Load+gen time very high

Hi all
i m using SAP 4.7 on Oracle 9.2
Server- IBM P series Processor 375Mhzx 2 RAM - 3 GB
I hav problem that in ST03n i have Load +Gen time very high (upto 500)
is it some H/w problem or some tuning prob.
Thanks in Advance

SGEN will recompile ABAP loads that you want.
your system look old, so, this can take anything from 1 hour to 8 hours.
so, do this when user load is minimal.
I usually choose all options and do a complete generation. this takes a lot of space in your DB, but system will be faster even if you use rarely used transactions.

Similar Messages

  • Issue with Query OLAP time very high

    Hello Guyz
    I ran my query in RSRT, and noticed tht the QOLAPTIME was almost 432 seconds (the query had crossed the 65556 records limit by then). The DBTIME was 70 secs.
    1. Are the above times in seconds?
    2. What are the performance techs I can implement, to improve the OLAP time? Since I think aggregates, indexing and partitioning only improve the DB time?
    3. I already have cache active on this query.
    Any suggestions?
    Please don't post the same question across the different forums
    Edited by: Moderator on Jul 8, 2009 11:46 AM

    Hello,
    One more thing, do any of the standard tech. of Indexing, Partitioning, Aggregate creation help in decreasing the OLAP time?
    These tech will be helpful for DB time but no use for OLAP time. And RKF didn't cost extra OLAP time but CKF and CELL calculation do.
    In your post you said there are more than 65535 rows. That's the main cause of high OLAP time according to my experience. Why users want so many rows? It's almost impossible to read. You can imaging how long it would take to transfer so many data from bw server to user (result in high OLAP time).
    Please reduce the lines by filter or something else. If you can't reduce the line number, I don't think the OLAP time would be low.
    Regards,
    Frank

  • Form display time very high

    Hi!!
    i have developed a form both in Oracle 3.0.7 and 3.0.8 and in this last the same form the display time is more high than in the previous version. It needs at least 20 seconds to display the form. And the machine in with i have the new version is more powerfull 2 processor and 512 RAM. Could i do something to improve the display time??
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    This is the bug in Portal 3.0.8 form component, u have to create two additional index, for which script is given below.
    Create 2 additional indexes:
    CREATE INDEX WWA_MODULE_BINDINGS_IDX1
    ON WWA_MODULE_BINDINGS$(
    SUBSCRIBER_ID,
    MODULE_ID,
    MODULE_VERSION,
    MODULE_BLOCK_ID,
    MODULE_ATTR_ID)
    CREATE INDEX WWA_MODULE_LOV_BINDINGS_IDX1
    ON WWA_MODULE_LOV_BINDINGS$(
    SUBSCRIBER_ID,
    MODULE_ID,
    MODULE_VERSION,
    MODULE_BLOCK_ID,
    MODULE_ATTR_ID)
    rgds,
    Sunil
    null

  • Roll wait time very high.

    Hi All,
    We are facing a strange problem.
    Our system is performing low just because of the share of high Roll Wait Time.
    Can anyone tell why it is so high ? and how to reduce it's time.
    Now it's taking more than 60% of Total Resp. Time.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Santosh Rajput

    Hi Santosh,
    sometimes we have the same problem when inserting records with MM41. In ST03 Top Response Times the roll wait time takes nearly  minutes, the whole response time 5 minutes.
    The SAP HELP defines roll wait time as follows:
    Wait time in the roll area.
    If synchronous RFCs are called, the work process performs a roll out and waits for the end of the RFC in the roll area. The RFC server programs can wait for other RFCs to be sent to them in the roll area.
    I'm not quite sure whether this explanation meets your or my problem because the problem occurs just two or three times a day. So - what is the process waiting for?
    Can anybody help?
    Thanks and best regards,
    Frank Ihnen

  • Very high HDD load/unload cycles and hardware ECC (SMART)

    Hello,
    I just took a look at my Seagate HDDs SMART values and found 2 very high numbers:
    Load/Unload Cycle Count: 29.422, and increasing +1 like every 15 seconds, together with a clunking noise.
    Hardware ECC Recovered: 320.239.221, and increasing +10 or more like every second.
    The Load/Unload stuff seems to be aggressive power management of either the drive itself or the OS, I have no clue how to stop this. I tried keeping the drive busy with declunk, but it still parks the heads every few seconds.
    But what is Hardware ECC ? And can anyone give me an advice on how to stop my drive moving the heads to the parking position every 15 seconds ? When I used Tiger, opening Photo Booth did the trick, doesn't work on Leopard tho. The HDD is less than 1 month old...

    I too was getting so annoyed by the clunking sounds. The APM settings for the HDD are obviously out of whack completely. Tried Declunk which has been mentioned in other threads in the forums. It basically runs as a daemon making a small file and then deleting it every 5 seconds. I got it to work, but I had to introduce an additional parameter string to force it to create the file every 4 seconds. Visit http://kiza.kcore.de/software/declunk/ for more information on this issue.
    Overall, I was still unhappy with the solution. Creating a file ever few seconds isn't optimal.
    Having tested disabling the APM settings with hdparm for WinXP (Via Bootcamp) and found that it fixed the clunking sound, I knew that APM was definitely causing the sound. Of course, hdparm did not update the firmware of the hdd, so every time I powered down my MBP, the hdd would go back to APM being on "FULL" bringing
    back the "clunk" sound.
    The ideal solution was to obtain some kind of APM management software for OSX. Unfortunately, the historical application known as APM Tuner X was no longer being developed by the author and does not run in Leopard.
    Thats when I found HDAPM!!!
    http://mckinlay.net.nz/hdapm/
    How did you determine the load/unload cycles for your HDD? In the end I located a copy of smartmon for Windows and booted into WinXp (via Bootcamp). I think my cycles are up to over 100,000... Not sure how to easily tell?!
    Anyway, I hope that this solves your issue. Apple's Energy Saving system preference pane SHOULD disable putting the hard disk to sleep if left unchecked, but I also believe this is an issue with many HDD's. Seagate are shocking when it comes to releasing firmware upgrades too by the looks of things.

  • Very High processing time in STAD

    Hi
    I have a problem in my NW04 BI system.
    Users are occasionally experiencing high responsetimes while using the HTTP interface to work with BI reports.
    If I display the statistical records STAD I can see that while using the SAPMHTTP program the "processing time" and therefor "Total time in workprocs" are very high but other times in the record are very low. CPU time is very low. Below is the detailed analysis.
    CPU time                      94 ms
    RFC+CPIC time                  0 ms
    Total time in workprocs  481.566 ms
      Response time          481.566 ms
    Wait for work process          0 ms
    Processing time          481.093 ms
    Load time                      1 ms
    Generating time                0 ms
    Roll (in+wait) time            0 ms
    Database request time        226 ms
    Enqueue time                   0 ms
    DB procedure call time       246 ms
    Number      Roll ins            1    
                Roll outs           1    
                Enqueues            8    
    Load time   Program             1  ms
                Screen              0  ms
                CUA interf.         0  ms
    Roll time   Out                 0  ms
                In                  0  ms
                Wait                0  ms
    Frontend    No.roundtrips       0    
                GUI time            0  ms
                Net time            0  ms                                     
    No. of DB procedure calls       1    
    Can anyone tell me what is going on in the system or how I can go further to analyze this. You might assume that this is a CPU bottleneck but it is not, I am using 4 x 64bit processors and 12Gb memory with load of 5-10% when this problem occurs.
    Best Regards
    Sindri

    why should the database be a problem, it is
    > Database request time 226 ms
    Go to the details (double click) of the line with problems. In the details you should have a button 'http' in the action line. There you can chewck the http details which should tell you where the time was spend.
    As always, repeat your measurements a few times to see whether the behaviour is reproducible.
    Siegfried

  • Very high "load average" in top

    Hi,
    our OES11SP1 two-server-cluster (fully patched) shows a very high "load
    average" (>50, up to 110) in top in some circumstances. There are no
    problems in normal operation, but administrator actions like shutdown or
    cluster migrate might trigger the problem.
    For example when I enter 'halt', then there is the following line in
    /var/log/messages:
    Sep 12 20:27:18 srv1 shutdown[14675]: shutting down for system halt
    more than 20 minutes later:
    Sep 12 20:51:19 srv1 init: Switching to runlevel: 0
    Within thes 20 minutes nothing happens, but "average load" goes up to at
    least 50, with ndsd at top. Access to storage related tools and commands is
    not possible, for example 'nss /pool' hangs without any output.
    This happens on nearly every shutdown, but from time to time it doesn't. The
    same will sometimes be triggered by a cluster migrate.
    This only happens with our OES11SP1 cluster, it does not happen with OES11
    and OES2SP3; the only other difference I'm aware of: Novell CIFS is only
    running on the OES11SP1 cluster.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Mirko

    Sorry for the delay, it seems it's a bad habit of me to ask questions
    immediately before holidays...
    Yes, these servers have replicas, all of them... Cache size is set to 195328
    KB, which is about twice the DIB size. IIRC this was a recommendation I read
    somewhere at Novell. But I'll check that information again.
    Thanks,
    Mirko
    kjhurni wrote:
    >
    > Mirko Guldner;2283539 Wrote:
    >> top shows ndsd on top - but it's there in normal operation too, so I
    >> don't
    >> know if this means something.. (?) And it's not always the CPU which is
    >> at
    >> 100% - I have an example screenshot with: load average 50.20, 51.61,
    >> 41.0
    >> 3.2%us, 1.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 77.0%id 18%wa 0.0%hi 0.3%si 0.0%st. But this is
    >> only
    >> an example - this differs.
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >> Mirko
    >>
    >> kjhurni wrote:
    >>
    >> >
    >> > Mirko Guldner;2283448 Wrote:
    >> >> Hi,
    >> >>
    >> >> our OES11SP1 two-server-cluster (fully patched) shows a very high
    >> "load
    >> >> average" (>50, up to 110) in top in some circumstances. There are no
    >> >> problems in normal operation, but administrator actions like
    >> shutdown
    >> >> or
    >> >> cluster migrate might trigger the problem.
    >> >>
    >> >> For example when I enter 'halt', then there is the following line in
    >> >> /var/log/messages:
    >> >>
    >> >> Sep 12 20:27:18 srv1 shutdown[14675]: shutting down for system halt
    >> >>
    >> >> more than 20 minutes later:
    >> >>
    >> >> Sep 12 20:51:19 srv1 init: Switching to runlevel: 0
    >> >>
    >> >> Within thes 20 minutes nothing happens, but "average load" goes up
    >> to
    >> >> at
    >> >> least 50, with ndsd at top. Access to storage related tools and
    >> commands
    >> >> is
    >> >> not possible, for example 'nss /pool' hangs without any output.
    >> >>
    >> >> This happens on nearly every shutdown, but from time to time it
    >> doesn't.
    >> >> The
    >> >> same will sometimes be triggered by a cluster migrate.
    >> >>
    >> >> This only happens with our OES11SP1 cluster, it does not happen with
    >> >> OES11
    >> >> and OES2SP3; the only other difference I'm aware of: Novell CIFS is
    >> >> only
    >> >> running on the OES11SP1 cluster.
    >> >>
    >> >> Any ideas?
    >> >>
    >> >> Thanks,
    >> >> Mirko
    >> >
    >> > Which process(es) does top show as being the culprit?
    >> >
    >> > In the past (on OES2 SP3) we had issues with CIFS causing ncp to
    >> cause
    >> > high utilization, but that was fixed a while ago.
    >> >
    >> > --Kevin
    >> >
    >> >
    >
    > I have seen ncp issues cause high ndsd utilization, but we've not yet
    > upgraded our cluster or DS servers to OES11 yet (waiting for new
    > hardware to go in place first).
    >
    > Out of curiosity, are the servers with high utilization also replica
    > servers? For some reason, during one of our upgrades on a replica
    > server (we have a server that contains all R/W copies of everything),
    > the cache size got set down really low and that caused all sorts of
    > issues.
    >
    > Maybe one of my collegues will wander by and offer additional insight,
    > as this may be eDir related and/or NCP related. Not sure if triggering
    > a core manually would help (but you'd have to send that to Novell and
    > open an SR to get it read).
    >
    > IF you suspect CIFS, do you have the ability to temporarily shut off
    > CIFS for like a few days to see if that's the culprit?
    >
    >

  • SG200-26P [FW-1.1.2.0] - Very High Response Time: 1000ms!

    Hello,
    Problem: New SG-200 26P Smart Switch with Latest Firmware - Very High Responce Time 500-800ms
    We've a EdgeMarc 4500 Router with 10 VPN tunnels to 10 brach locations. SG-200 26P Smart Switch is connected to 7 Servers (2 Terminal, SQL, and Other) All locations have 50MB Download and 20MB Upload speed from Verizon FiOS Internet service.
    As per the SolarWind tool, the response time of this switch is around at 500ms. At the same time, the EdgeMarc 4500 router response time is around 40ms and less.
    We've 60 desktops remotely connected to our SQL Server database and 40 RDP Users via Remote Desktop. The configuration is same from past 3 years. But we change the switch from HP 1800-24G to Cisco due to some Connection Failures. For Connection Failures, we first suspect the old HP switch, but it's look like issue with EdgeMarc Router.
    Is this Response Time is normal? I attached two screenshots of both Cisco Switch and EdgeMarc Router Response Time from past 24 hours according to SolarWind tool. Any further advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

    Hello Srinath,
    Thank you for participating in the Small Business support community. My name is Nico Muselle from Cisco Sofia SBSC.
    The response time from the switch could be considered as quite normal. Reason for this is that the switch gives CPU priority to it's actual duties which would of course be switching, access lists, VLANs, QoS, multicast and DHCP snooping etc etc. As a result of that, ping response times of the switch itself do not show in any way the correct working of the switch.
    I invite you to try pinging clients connected to the switch, you should be able to notice that response times to the clients are a lot lower than response times of the switch itself.
    Hope this answers your question !
    Best regards,
    Nico Muselle
    Sr. Network Engineer - CCNA - CCNA Security

  • Deadlocks and very high wait times

    We are seeing a very high number of deadlocks in the system. The deadlocks trace all show a 'enq: TX - row lock contention' with wait times of around 2929700+ seconds ex:
    last wait for 'enq: TX - row lock contention' blocking sess=0x70000006d85e1b8 seq=55793 wait_time=2929704 seconds since wait started=4
    name|mode=54580006, usn<<16 | slot=1d0010, sequence=705f
    Dumping Session Wait History
    for 'enq: TX - row lock contention' count=1 wait_time=2929704
    name|mode=54580006, usn<<16 | slot=1d0010, sequence=705f
    for 'latch: enqueue hash chains' count=1 wait_time=1649
    address=70000006dbb4a20, number=13, tries=0
    for 'enq: TX - row lock contention' count=1 wait_time=2929708
    name|mode=54580006, usn<<16 | slot=1d0010, sequence=705f
    for 'SQL*Net message from client' count=1 wait_time=101740
    driver id=54435000, #bytes=1, =0
    for 'SQL*Net message to client' count=1 wait_time=1
    driver id=54435000, #bytes=1, =0
    for 'direct path write temp' count=1 wait_time=921
    file number=fb, first dba=6521b, block cnt=2
    for 'SQL*Net more data from client' count=1 wait_time=3
    driver id=54435000, #bytes=10, =0
    for 'SQL*Net more data from client' count=1 wait_time=5
    driver id=54435000, #bytes=1e, =0
    for 'SQL*Net more data from client' count=1 wait_time=10
    driver id=54435000, #bytes=2c, =0
    for 'SQL*Net more data from client' count=1 wait_time=5
    driver id=54435000, #bytes=3a, =0
    Any ideas on how to resolve this ?
    Thanks
    Surya

    Sorry for the typo, that Ora-0060 error we are seeing. Here is the deadlock graph:
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
    With the Partitioning, Oracle Label Security, OLAP, Data Mining Scoring Engine
    and Real Application Testing options
    ORACLE_HOME = /orasw/product/10.2.0.4.0
    System name: AIX
    Node name: spda5001
    Release: 3
    Version: 5
    Machine: 00074D5AD400
    Instance name: IAMS01P1
    Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
    Oracle process number: 21
    Unix process pid: 2306444, image: oracle@spda5001
    *** 2011-12-24 05:05:39.885
    *** SERVICE NAME:(IAMS01P) 2011-12-24 05:05:39.884
    *** SESSION ID:(443.2130) 2011-12-24 05:05:39.884
    DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
    [Transaction Deadlock]
    The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
    deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
    or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
    information may aid in determining the deadlock:
    Deadlock graph:
    ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
    Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
    TX-00080020-000c3957 21 443 X 58 391 X
    TX-001d0010-0000705f 58 391 X 21 443 X
    session 443: DID 0001-0015-0000002E session 391: DID 0001-003A-00000081
    session 391: DID 0001-003A-00000081 session 443: DID 0001-0015-0000002E
    Rows waited on:
    Session 391: obj - rowid = 0001098B - AAATtpAAGAAADROAAD
    (dictionary objn - 67979, file - 6, block - 13390, slot - 3)
    Session 443: obj - rowid = 00010B25 - AAARRwAAGAAAAdgAAN
    (dictionary objn - 68389, file - 6, block - 1888, slot - 13)
    Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
    Session 391:
    pid=58 serial=16572 audsid=52790041 user: 93/IAMS_USR
    O/S info: user: , term: , ospid: 1234, machine: mac3023
    program:
    Current SQL Statement:
    update spt_identity set created=:1, modified=:2, owner=:3, assigned_scope=:4, assigned_scope_path=:5, extended1=:6, extended2=:7, extended3=:8, extended4=:9, extended5=:10, extended6=:11, extended7=:12, extended8=:13, extended9=:14, extended10=:15, extended11=:16, extended12=:17, extended13=:18, extended14=:19, extended15=:20, extended16=:21, extended17=:22, extended18=:23, extended19=:24, extended20=:25, name=:26, description=:27, protected=:28, iiqlock=:29, attributes=:30, manager=:31, display_name=:32, firstname=:33, lastname=:34, email=:35, manager_status=:36, inactive=:37, last_login=:38, last_refresh=:39, password=:40, password_expiration=:41, password_history=:42, bundle_summary=:43, assigned_role_summary=:44, correlated=:45, auth_question_lock_start=:46, failed_auth_question_attempts=:47, controls_assigned_scope=:48, certifications=:49, activity_config=:50, preferences=:51, history=:52, scorecard=:53, uipreferences=:54, attribute_meta_data=:55, workgroup=:56 where id=:57
    End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
    Current SQL statement for this session:
    update spt_workflow_case set created=:1, modified=:2, owner=:3, assigned_scope=:4, assigned_scope_path=:5, stack=:6, attributes=:7, launcher=:8, host=:9, launched=:10, completed=:11, progress=:12, percent_complete=:13, type=:14, messages=:15, name=:16, description=:17, complete=:18, target_class=:19, target_id=:20, target_name=:21, workflow=:22 where id=:23

  • Response times (PING) very high with CAP3602i access point

    I have installed an access point CAP3602i in mode HREAP a controller Model 5508  with version 7.4.100.0 but the response times of the connected users are very high.
    The less users are connected to the access point is faster surfing the internet and response times are low. But if there are many users connected, increase response times.
    I'll be grateful someone comments any experience with this problem.
    Thanks

    We are talking about 15 users per AP, but that everything is surfing the internet and not so heavy downloads before aps 1141 and had had no such problem response times were normal between 2,3,4 ms
    There is performing some function more cap3602i ap causes high response times.
    Supposedly CAP3602i I say are better than the 1141, which is why we made the change but we found with surprise that high times.
    The SSID was HREAP doubt it has anything to do with the 1141 does not give the issue of high times.

  • Very high server load

    Hi,
    I have run into an issue with very high server load on a OES11sp2 server.
    After a lot of troubleshooting we found that the cause was the adminusd process.
    Last month i patched the server and we upgraded to novell-nss-4.16.4940-0.5.9, this contains the new adminusd component.
    Specifically we found that it was related to volume space restrictions.
    After turning volume space restrictions off the load of the server dropped from 10+ down to 0.66 (atm).
    The strange thing was that adminusd wasn't showing up in top directly, but the us% was very high.
    The problem only pops up when a lot of people are logged in and drops off again when the number is low.
    Any idea to what is going on?
    Cheers,
    Frank

    hi all,
    I checked the environment again,
    then came to know that my SAN is not connected through FIbre Channel or any other faster channel to the Server and its connected through 100MBPs line... this was causing the slow and also there was a lot IO wait in my Oracle VM server.
    Thanks,
    Sri.

  • HT1338 While booting macbook pro OSX lion 10.7.3 display blue screen for 3 seconds and booting,booting time is also very high. HOw to solve the proble

    while booting macbook pro OSx version MAC OSX 10.7.3 display blue screen for some 5 second and continue the booting? such that booting time is high.How to resolve the problem.please guide me to solve that.I have tried NEW installation format installed 10.7.3 from online installation after that aslo im getting the ame problem.

    Run through this list and get back with me
    Step by Step to fix your Mac
    Mac won't boot or "You need to restart"
    Create a data recovery, undelete boot drive

  • Once firefox is opened my mac pro lap top starts to rev very high. This has not happen before. And I lost all my tabs from the last session. Has this been a problem recently and how can I solve it? I am trying to avoid my system crashing.

    firefox is working my system too hard and the system is revving very high.
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == today ==
    == User Agent ==
    Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.22.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Safari/531.22.7

    Does this start right when you start firefox or after you've loaded some pages? Are there specific pages that cause this problem?

  • Cpu time is high

    In the below statspack report CPU time is very high.....how to voercome this prole....is there any other problem also pls suggest me.
    OS:SUN Solris
    DB=Oracle 9.2.0.6
    STATSPACK report for
    DB Name         DB Id    Instance     Inst Num Release     Cluster Host
    ICAI          1372079993 icai12              2 9.2.0.6.0   YES     icai2
                  Snap Id     Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess Comment
    Begin Snap:        11 12-Sep-08 13:55:54      931       7.2
      End Snap:        12 12-Sep-08 17:04:24      623       7.4
       Elapsed:              188.50 (mins)
    Cache Sizes (end)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                   Buffer Cache:     2,512M      Std Block Size:          8K
               Shared Pool Size:       608M          Log Buffer:        977K
    Load Profile
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~                            Per Second       Per Transaction
                      Redo size:              1,026.01              8,844.68
                  Logical reads:              4,270.92             36,817.17
                  Block changes:                  5.28                 45.55
                 Physical reads:                243.47              2,098.82
                Physical writes:                  0.41                  3.52
                     User calls:                 37.58                323.93
                         Parses:                  5.82                 50.19
                    Hard parses:                  0.31                  2.65
                          Sorts:                  2.59                 22.29
                         Logons:                  0.07                  0.58
                       Executes:                 17.69                152.49
                   Transactions:                  0.12
      % Blocks changed per Read:    0.12    Recursive Call %:     41.69
    Rollback per transaction %:   25.61       Rows per Sort:    100.12
    Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                Buffer Nowait %:  100.00       Redo NoWait %:    100.00
                Buffer  Hit   %:   94.30    In-memory Sort %:    100.00
                Library Hit   %:   98.28        Soft Parse %:     94.72
             Execute to Parse %:   67.09         Latch Hit %:     99.93
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %:   54.11     % Non-Parse CPU:     99.75
    Shared Pool Statistics        Begin   End
                 Memory Usage %:   90.81   89.84
        % SQL with executions>1:   51.49   48.75
      % Memory for SQL w/exec>1:   52.77   51.31
    Top 5 Timed Events
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                                                     % Total
    Event                                               Waits    Time (s) Ela Time
    CPU time                                                       20,029    75.44
    global cache cr request                           873,734       1,904     7.17
    db file scattered read                            346,161       1,577     5.94
    db file sequential read                           173,543       1,558     5.87
    db file parallel read                              14,902         616     2.32

    Sorry for being late....
    I think there is only one or two query causing problem....is it true that if there is only one or two query causing problem that is if the query is taking near about 30% elaspsed time cpu does it have a impact on the performance of the db......
    SQL ordered by Reads for DB: ICAI  Instance: icai12  Snaps: 11 -12
    -> End Disk Reads Threshold:      1000
                                                         CPU      Elapsd
    Physical Reads  Executions  Reads per Exec %Total Time (s)  Time (s) Hash Value
          1,097,317           11       99,756.1   39.8   386.68   1778.96 1585476974
    SELECT NVL(TO_CHAR(A.DEH_APPLICATION_DT,'DD/MM/RRRR'), NULL ),NV
    L(TO_CHAR(A.DEH_DT,'DD/MM/RRRR'), NULL )   FROM OT_DAK_ENTRY_HEA
    D A,OT_DAK_ENTRY_DETL B,OT_FIRM_NAME_APPR_HEAD C  WHERE A.DEH_SY
    S_ID = B.DED_DEH_SYS_ID  AND B.DED_DAK_SYS_ID = C.FNAH_DED_SYS_I
    D  AND C.FNAH_SYS_ID =  (SELECT MAX(B.FNAH_SYS_ID)   FROM OT_FIR
            407,436            6       67,906.0   14.8   122.60    720.09 1414719916
    UPDATE OM_MEM_REG_HEAD SET MRH_MRN=:b1 WHERE MRH_SYS_ID = :b2
            407,436            6       67,906.0   14.8   122.54    720.00 1414796677
    UPDATE OT_DAK_ACTV_HISTORY SET DAH_REG_NO = :B1 WHERE DAH_REG_NO
    = :B3 AND TRUNC(DAH_ACTV_ED_DT ) <= TRUNC(:B2 ) AND DAH_ACTV_ST
    ATUS = 'C'
            288,612           23       12,548.3   10.5    61.05    312.13 3146526985
    Module: JDBC Thin Client
    BEGIN PACK_INSERT_INTERNET_TEST.IT_INSERT_MEM_ADD_CHG_REQ(:1,:2,
    :3,:4,:5,:6,:7,:8,:9,:10,:11,:12,:13); END;
            110,742            1      110,742.0    4.0    35.17    172.63 1517630850
    SELECT NVL(TO_CHAR(A.DEH_APPLICATION_DT,'DD/MM/RRRR'), NULL ),NV
    L(TO_CHAR(A.DEH_DT,'DD/MM/RRRR'), NULL )   FROM OT_DAK_ENTRY_HEA
    D A,OT_DAK_ENTRY_DETL B,OM_FIRM_OPENCLOSE_SO C  WHERE A.DEH_SYS_
    ID = B.DED_DEH_SYS_ID  AND B.DED_DAK_SYS_ID = C.FSO_DED_SYS_ID
    AND C.FSO_SYS_ID =  (SELECT MAX(B.FSO_SYS_ID)   FROM OM_FIRM_OPE
             90,155          104          866.9    3.3   255.47    986.07 4142254844
    SELECT LTRIM(RTRIM(DECODE(TIT_NAME,'MR.','CA.','MS.','CA.','MRS.
    ','CA.') || ' '  || MRH_FIRST_NAME  || ' '  || MRH_MIDDLE_NAME
    || ' '  || MRH_SUR_NAME  || ' '  || DECODE(MRH_APPR_UID, NULL ,
    NULL ,DECODE(MRH_MEM_STATUS,2, NULL ,DECODE(MRH_FELLOW_STATUS_YN
    ,'Y','FCA','ACA')))  || DECODE(MRH_RESI_STATUS,'A','
             82,002            1       82,002.0    3.0   121.61    459.95 2335688323
    SELECT 'X'   FROM OV_APPROVED_DOCUMENTS  WHERE APPR_DOC_TXN_CODE
    = :b1  AND APPR_DOC_NO = :b2  AND EXISTS  (SELECT 'X'   FROM OT
    DAKENTRY_HEAD A,OT_DAK_ENTRY_DETL B,OM_DAK C  WHERE A.DEH_SYS_
    ID = B.DED_DEH_SYS_ID  AND A.DEH_SYS_ID = APPR_DOC_SYS_ID  AND C
    .DAK_TXN_CODE = :b3  AND C.DAK_CHANGE_TYPE IN ( 'F'  ) AND B.DED
             65,494           12        5,457.8    2.4    23.18    137.86 3958290687
    SELECT MEP_DOC_STATUS   FROM OT_MEM_EMPLOYMENT  WHERE MEP_REF_SY
    S_ID = :b1  AND MEP_REF_FROM = 'MG'
             60,028            3       20,009.3    2.2    12.59    157.78 2405844617
    Module: JDBC Thin Client
    INSERT INTO IT_ADD_DTL (ADD_DT_ACK_NO, ADD_DT_SR_NO, ADD_DT_MRN,
    ADD_DT_TYPE, ADD_DT_LINE1, ADD_DT_LINE2, ADD_DT_LINE3, ADD_DT_L
    INE4, ADD_DT_CITY_CODE, ADD_DT_OTHER_CITY, ADD_DT_PIN_CODE, ADD_
    DT_TEL, ADD_DT_EMAIL, ADD_DT_OP_DT, ADD_DT_CL_DT, ADD_DT_CL_YN,
    ADD_DT_INCHG_MRN, ADD_CORR_DT_LINE1, ADD_CORR_DT_LINE2, ADD_CORR
             60,022            6       10,003.7    2.2    12.31    155.97 3242469259
    SQL ordered by Reads for DB: ICAI  Instance: icai12  Snaps: 11 -12
    -> End Disk Reads Threshold:      1000
    SQL ordered by Gets for DB: ICAI  Instance: icai12  Snaps: 11 -12
    -> End Buffer Gets Threshold:     10000
    -> Note that resources reported for PL/SQL includes the resources used by
       all SQL statements called within the PL/SQL code.  As individual SQL
       statements are also reported, it is possible and valid for the summed
       total % to exceed 100
                                                         CPU      Elapsd
      Buffer Gets    Executions  Gets per Exec  %Total Time (s)  Time (s) Hash Value
         12,271,784           58      211,582.5   25.4   484.35   1453.46   17574787
    SELECT /*+ INDEX (OM_COURSE_FEE OCF_CFC_CODE)  */DISTINCT CF_COU
    RSE_CODE   FROM OM_COURSE_FEE,OT_STUDENT_FEE_COL_HEAD,OT_STUDENT
    FEECOL_DETL  WHERE SFCH_SYS_ID = SFCD_SFCH_SYS_ID  AND SFCD_FE
    E_TYPE_CODE = CF_TYPE_CODE  AND CF_COURSE_CODE IN ( 'PE1','PE2',
    'CCT','CPT'  ) AND SFCH_TXN_CODE = :b1  AND SFCD_SUBSCRBE_JOURNA
          7,064,924          120       58,874.4   14.6   102.74    226.01 3102119461
    SELECT ROWID,AR_DT,AR_TXN_CODE,AR_NO,AR_AMD_NO,AR_REF_FROM,AR_RE
    F_TXN_CODE,AR_REF_NO,AR_DAK_CODE,AR_DED_SYS_ID,AR_COMP_CODE,AR_A
    CNT_YR,AR_AMD_DT,AR_AMD_UID,AR_AMD_RES_CODE,AR_REF_SYS_ID,AR_STU
    D_SRN,AR_APPL_DT,AR_ISSUE_DT,AR_ENROL_FRM_COURSE,AR_ENROL_DT,AR_
    JOURNAL_YN,AR_TYPE,AR_TITLE,AR_VACANCY_CODE,AR_MRH_MRN,AR_INDUST

  • Very High Resolution PDFs for iPad

    Hello,
    A friend gave me a few PDF files created from very high resolution pictures to view on my iPad.
    I loaded the PDF files on iBooks and so far so good. The problem is that when I swipe from a PDF page to another the image doesnt appear immidietly. It takes some time and the image is blur before it appears... After is fine but I want to remove this delay.
    Does anyone knows any proper method to view high resolution PDF on iPad without delay when changing pages ? Or how what method or format to follow so to make them proper ?
    Thanks in Advance.

    What PDF reader are you using? Perhaps there is one out there that renders files better.
    However, if the images are large then there is only so much that can be done. That delay is caused by the device processing the image. If you find a more efficient reader that may help. But you may also want to consider tweaking with those images, knocking them down just a bit and find that sweet spot where they're still of a good quality but not so large that they push the boundaries of what the device can handle.

Maybe you are looking for

  • The disk could not be read from or written to message

    my computer shows the error: "Atempting to copy to the Disk "Ipod" failed the diskcould not be read from or written to" and after i tried restoring my ipod it still wouldn't work. what do i do?

  • I took a still shot from old movie in iMovie and now want to work with it on desktop.  How?

    I took a still shot from an old family movie in iMovie.  Now it is a still in my project library of iMovie.  How can I copy it and put it on my desktop where I can email it?  I need to get it out of iMovie and onto my desktop.  Help!

  • Adobe Flash always likes to crash in firefox

    So I used to be able to watch two different youtube videos or at least have two different flash programs open on two different monitors. Now whenever I have a video open on one monitor, I can't even click on the video loaded in the other monitor with

  • Database type used in DMS

    Can somebody please tell me what Database is used in DMS? I understand that this is an appliance so please don't flame me. I have to answer this for a compliance issue with a hospital. Telling them that it is an appliance with a hardened database wil

  • How do you *unset*  Content-Type when using HttpURLConnection ?

    Hi people, I am using HttpURLConnection to set some http headers. It all works fine except that this utility is setting Content-type to text/html even though I cam not coding it to do so. I can overwrite Content-type by setting it to say, a blank, ex