Export Tax(Vat) based on Bill to party

Hi
I have a very peculiar sutuation, in normal scenario tax and prices are determined based on Ship-To-Party country and plant, however, client expect Export Tax to be calculated based Bill to party country. Need suggesttion, how to address this query.
Could you please suggest. Points will be rewarded to helpful answers.
Regards
Kalpesh

Hi Kalpesh
I think you need to change your access sequence of MWST.
Via transaction code V/07.
You need to change the destination country (which is ship to country) into sold to party via field catalog. But we do not advise this to clients, because you are then changing the standard SAP logic.
If the client really insists, then you need to make a new pricing procedure like MWST ie ZMWST with the necessary changes/settings but of course this a lot work again.
Hope this helps, I would appreciate if you could reward if helpful
kr
hakan

Similar Messages

Tax Determination Bases on Bill to Party and Ship to Party

Hi Guru ,
I have a requirement Tax should be determined based on Bill to Party and Ship to Party.
If Bill to and Ship to are Overseas Customers then '0' TAX.
For all remaining Customers 7 % Tax
Could you please advice
Thanks

Hello,
Define two ACCESS SEQUENCE with the combination of Region code/Country key
Define the two TAX CONDITION types and assign the Access sequence one for each scenario
In OVK1 assign the Country key and TAX CONDITION and in OVK3 assign the tax category as 0 for the Overseas customer and 1 for Domestic customer
Then in VK11 maintain the condition records as 0% for Overseas customers and 7% for the Domestic customers.
Regards,
santosh

Dunning letter based on Bill-to-party

Hi,
We have a custom smartform for Dunning letter which is a copy of a standard one.It is being triggered by BTE.
We have an incoming structure 'mhnd' which is populated based on sold to party and picks up all the outstanding documents pertaining to it.The dunning letter is issued to the sold to party customer.
The function module (FI_PRINT_DUNNING_NOTICE_SMARTF)trigggered by the event has mhnd already populated and is passed in the tables parameter.
Now the requirement is to pick the data based on bill to party and issue it to that customer.
How can we change the data in mhnd based on bill to party?
Replies appreciated.
Regards,
Blessy

Hi
You don't need to change the print because sold to party and bill to party are both customer for FI, so u need only to know the right customer code.
Max

Tax based on Sold to Party

Hi,
Our requirement is that while creating SO the tax should be as per sold to party , as ref. to below thread
Tax based on Sold to Party or Bill to Party. i have maintain A' in
Go to IMG Path --> SD --> Basic Functions --> Taxes --> Maintain Sales Tax ID number determination
but still system is taking tax codes ref. to ship to party insted of sold to part
out requirement is Sold to party is from gujrat Tax CST and ship to part is in maharashtra Tax VAT and our plant is also in maharshtra but system is taking tax of maharshtra insted of GUJRAT.
regards,
zafar
Edited by: zkarnalkar on Feb 28, 2011 10:53 AM

Better try to update in a positive manner as to whether the suggestions resolved your issue and if so, which one has helped you. This will help others who have similar requirement.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

CST or VAT needs to be determined based on Ship-to-party

Dear All,
We have a specific requirement for one of our customer.
Customer wants the system to determine CST and VAT to be determined based on ship to party.
Say for Example, we have a condition table Country / Region / Region of Delivering plant / Tax class. Cust. / Tax Class. Mat.
In the sales Ship to party and Sold to party are different.
In this case, if the tax classification of the Sold to party 0 and tax classification of Ship to party is 1 means, system should determine CST or VAT according to According to ship to party.
In simple, CST or VAT should be determined based on Ship to party irrespective of the setting in Sold to party.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Mullairaja

Hello Mullairaja,
See Ship to Party is the partner who will receie the goods & applicability of VAT or CST will be decided by Ship to party Region.
As Sold to party & Ship to party can belong to different Regions (Different States in India) VAT or CST may be applicable as the case may be...
Thus this is a standard SAP funtion to determine VST / CST based on Region & Tax Classification Indicator of Ship-to-party.
Hope this helps..
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Sold to party based on Ship to party or Bill to party

Hi Everybody,
Can we able to find the sold to party based on the ship to party or the bill to party?
Thanks,
Srinivasan.K

Hi,
When you give the sold to party number and the partner function you need to get whether it is SH or BP then the output will bring out all the assigned bill to's and ship to's.
But my requirement is the input should be the SH or BP and it should bring out the sold to party assigned to ship to or Bill to.
Thanks,
Srinivasan.K

Billing Due List based on Ship to Party

Hi,
            I have a scenario where in I have multiple ship to parties in a single sales order . So there are different deliveries for all the different ship to parties (i.e Delivery Split). But I need to process the Billing due List based on the Ship to party. The Bill to party and the Payer is same for all the ship to parties. Let me have an example.
           Let the Sold to party -
111
                        Bill to Party    -
111
                        Payer            -
111
                        Ship to Party 1 -- 222
                        Ship to Party 2 -- 333
                    Sales order --- 99999 has 10 line items, 5 each going to each ship to party. Now I am having Multiple deliveries .
                      del 1-> 44444 (Del NO)--> 222
                      del 1-> 44445 (Del NO)--> 222
                      del 1-> 44446 (Del NO)--> 222
                      del 1-> 44447 (Del NO)--> 333
                      del 1-> 44448 (Del NO)--> 333
                      del 1-> 44449 (Del NO)--> 333
Now I want a single invoice for del 44447,44448,44449 and one more Single invoice for del 44444,44445,44446.
             So I need to have a Billing due list based on the Ship to Party. Please provide me if any solutions and also let me know if I am missing anything in the Standard SAP to achieve this.
Thankyou,
Rakesh Tummala.

Hi
USEREXIT_FILL_VBRK_VBRP will not work since it is the billing due index (VKDFS) that you want to add ship to ID as the sort criterion. The proper user exit are actually:
- USEREXIT_VKDFS_SORTKRI_SALES for order related billing
- USEREXIT_VKDFS_SORTKRI_DEL for delivery related billing
they are in include module V05IEXIT.
For delivery related billing it is a one line code as below
VKDFS-SORTKRI = LLIKP-KUNNR
Order related billing is a little more complicated because you can have ship at both header and item level. If you need this as well post a follow up
Once you have this done, then you can use the sort criterion field in VF04 to do ship to selection for you

VAT / CST if Ship-to-Party is different

Dear All,
Issue is regarding the Tax calculated for the respective Partner.
Sold-to-Party & Bill-to-party is in Karnataka (VAT applicable).
Ship-to-Party is in other state say Tamil Nadu or Andra Pradesh (CST Applicable).
Logistics has to say that CST will be applicable, whereas Finance dept. has to say VAT is applicable.
May I know Tax calculation will be for CST or VAT?
Inputs and if any authenticated document supporting for the same will be of great help.
Awaiting for the response.
Thanks n regards,
Vijayashree

A similar argument was going long time back and I got this document from a tax consultant.
Meaning of u2018Inter State Sale
Section 3 of CST Act defines Inter-State sale or purchase as follows : A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce if the sale or purchase (a) occasions the movement of goods from one State to another or (b) is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods during their movement from one State to another. Thus, inter-state sale can be as per section 3(a) or section 3(b).
It has been held that these two modes are mutually exclusive. u2013 Tata Iron and Steel Co. (TISCO) v. S R Sarkar - (1960) 11 STC 655 (SC) = AIR 1961 SC 65 = (1961) 1 SCR 379 - confirmed in UOI v. K G Khosla & Co. Ltd. - (1979) 43 STC 457 (SC) = (1979) 2 SCC 242 = AIR 1979 SC 1160 = (1979) 3 SCR 453, i.e. when a sale falls under section 3(a) it cannot fall under section 3(b) and CST can be levied only once. In Bharat Heavy Electricals v. UOI - AIR 1996 SC 1854 = (1996) 102 STC 373 (SC) = (1996) 4 SCC 230 = JT 1996(4) SC 427, it was held that whether a particular sale is inter-state or not has to be decided only with reference to section 3 of CST Act alone and no other section. Similarly, to decide question in which State the tax is leviable, only section 9(1) is relevant - no other provision is relevant.
Sale which u2018Occasions movement of goodsu2019 - As per section 3(a), u2018Inter State saleu2019 takes place if the sale occasions movement of goods from one State to another. In CST v. Suresh Chand Jain - (1988) 70 STC 45 (SC), it was held that a sale can be said to be in the course of inter-state only if two conditions concur viz. sale of goods and (ii) a transport of those goods from one State to another.
There are following essential ingredients of inter-State sale under this sub-section:
Transaction must be a completed sale.
+Location of buyer and seller is immaterial. Thus, even if buyer and seller are within the same State, sale will be inter-state, if sale occasions movement of goods from one State to another. e.g. the buyer may have construction site in another State and may ask seller to despatch goods directly to the site. Inter State sale by transfer of documents is also possible even when buyer and seller are in same State.+
There should be an agreement to sale which contains a stipulation (express or implied) regarding movement of goods from one State to another. - Balabhgas Hulaschand v. State of Orissa (1976) 37 STC 207 (SC) = AIR 1976 SC 1016 = (1976) 2 SCC 44 = 1976 2 SCR 939.
It is immaterial whether a completed sale precedes the movement of goods or follows the movement of goods or takes place while the goods are in transit. What is important is that movement of goods and the sale must be inseparably connected - CST, UP v. Bakhtawar Lal Kailash Chand Arhti - (1992) 87 STC 196 = 1992 AIR SCW 2246 = AIR 1992 SC 1952 = JT 1992 (4) SC 388 (SC 3 member bench) [In Balabhgas Hulaschand v. State of Orissa (1976) 37 STC 207 (SC) = AIR 1976 SC 1016 = (1976) 2 SCC 44 = 1976 2 SCR 939, it was held that concluded sale should take place in a State which is different from the State from which goods move. However, now the later judgment (i.e. 1992 judgment) prevails].
From the above, you can conclude that tax should ONLY based on Ship To Party.
Hope this should be helpful to you.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Origin of sales tax ID number in billing documents

Hello,
The field "Origin of sales tax ID number" in billing documents determines from where the tax ID number is taken, for example:
   A - Ship-to party
   B - Payer
   C - Sold to Party
When the partner functions of the customer are different, how can I decide whose tax ID number the billing document takes? I need to take the tax ID of the payer but it takes of the ship to party.
Thanks in advance, best regards,
Silvia

hi,
The path here is IMG, Sales and distribution, Basic functions, Taxes, Maintain sales
taxIdentification number determination.
Three available options can be assigned to each sales organization. It is recommended that in order to keep consistency throughout the system, use the same determining rules across all sales organizations.
The first is determination rule A, which indicates that the tax number and tax indicator classification are generally taken from the sold-to party customer master record.
Determination rule B indicates that the tax number and tax classification are generally taken from the customer master record of the payer.
Finally, if the field is left blank, the system determines the tax number and the tax classification according to the following sequence:
1.If the payer has a VAT registration number and is identical to the sold-to party, the tax number and tax classification are copied from the payer (in this case, the ship-to party is not relevant). The tax number is copied according to the country of destination relevant for taxes.
2. If 1 does not apply, the ship-to party has a VAT registration number, and the sold-to party does not, the tax number and tax classification are copied from the ship-to party.
3. If 2 does not apply, the tax number and tax classification are copied from the sold-to party.
CHAN

Tax condition(JVAT) of ship to party is not triggering in Sales order

Hi,
Tax condition(JVAT) of ship to party is not triggering in sales order...
Scenario:
Tax condition types:
JCST- CST Payable
JVAT- VAT Payable GJ
Customer Tax classification for JVAT in OVK3:
1- VAT 4%
A- VAT 0%
B- VAT 2%
Material Tax classification for JVAT in OVK4:
0-Tax Exempt
1-Full Tax
In CMR for
Sold to Party:1001(Mumbai), In Sales Area Data(Billing Tab),we have
Country/Name/Tax category/Name/Tax Class./Descrption
IN / INDIA / JCST / CST Payable / 1 / CST 3%
IN / INDIA / JVAT / VAT Pay GJ / 1 / VAT 4%
In CMR for
Ship to Party:2001(Gujarat),In Sales Area Data(Billing Tab),we have
Country/Name/Tax category/Name/Tax Class./Descrption
IN / INDIA / JCST / CST Payable / 1 / CST 3%
IN / INDIA / JVAT / VAT Pay GJ / A / VAT 0%
Access Seq: JLST
Condition table : 368(Country/Region of Del Plant/Region/Tax class1-Cust/Tax Class1-Mat)
Condition record maintained for JVAT as IN/GJ/GJ/1/1 as 4%
Condition record maintained for JVAT as IN/GJ/GJ/A/1 as 0%
Now the sale(Shipping to) is happening in Gujarat..
In sales order
I entered SP:1001 and SH: 2001
When i check the pricing in sales order,condition type JVAT is triggering 4% which is not true as it as to pick 0%
Kindly guide me where i went wrong...
Regards
Azeez.Mohd

Hi Friends.
I found the solution...
Its customization mistake..
Solution:
When we have 'n' tax categories then we should have 'n' condition tables..
I have 2 tax categories: JCST and JVAT but i have only one condition table 368 which is wrong.. i should have 2 condition tables.. so i created another con. table 468 and assigned to access aeq JLST.
then when i create cond. record , we have to select the appropriate table then it will fetch accordingly.. in sales order..
with regards

Tax calculation in SD Billing

Hi all of you,
We have configured the tax procedure and created the tax codes. Tax codes are working fine in FI module and in MM module. The condition types with access sequence MWST and account keys using in tax procedure, we have taken the same for SD Pricing procedure also.
Coming to SD Billing, taxes will be calculated based on the condition record where we will assign the tax code since we do not have tax code field in the sales order or invoice. Why SAP has not given the option to select the tax code in Sales Order like Purchase Order? When I am doing condition record for the condition type, system is showing the tax percentage based on the given tax code but the condition is not picking the condition record while creating the sales order.
Typically tax code consists of -
Condition type - 1111 - Tax code - S1 - 10% (Service tax)
2222 - Tax code - S1 - 2% (Education cess)
3333 - Tax code - S1 - 1% (Secondary Ed cess)
In the above scenario, how do I do the condition record?
And what about the advance tax return report? Will system show the line items per tax code or not?
Please help me regarding
Thanks
Ramki

Tax in SD will be determined based on several parameters. But SAP defalts Region of the delivering plant and Region of the Ship To Party.
In your sale order, if the tax code is not flowing, then you need to check whether for this combination, you have maintained the tax code in VK12 for condition type MWST.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Bill-to-Party and Payer Partner Determination in CRM Sales Order

Hi,
In ECC, the sold-to-party has different bill-to-party and payer for each sales areas .For example:
Sold-to-party:2001826
For 8000 sales org/72 distribution channel:
Payer: 2004818
Bill-to-party: 2004818
For 2000 sales org/ 02 distribution channel:
Payer:2001826
Bill-to-party: 2001826
These business partners are in CRM system and the relationship data based on sales organization exists in CRMM_BUT_FRG0081 database table.
I customize access sequence for bill-to-party and payer in CRM system which uses CRM_PARTNER_A by using Sold-to-Party as source. However it does not determine via this access sequence. Do you have any idea why the system does not use this relationship info?
Best,
Damlanur

Hi there,
Please use note 493947 to ensure all the manual configuration is in place. Also the item category for the plant item must be ATP relevant, the following code check this:
FILL_BTM_PARTNER_PLANT SAPLCRM_DOWNLOAD_MAP
check if item type is relevant for ATP
    check not ls_item_type-atp_profile is initial.
map plant to business partner
    lv_loc_number = <ls_bapisdit>-plant.
    lv_loc_type   = gc_atploctype-plant.
    call function 'CRM_CONFIRM_MAP_LOC_TO_BP'
      exporting
        iv_loc_number    = lv_loc_number
        iv_loc_type      = lv_loc_type
      importing
        ev_partner       = lv_partner_no
      exceptions
        no_mapping_found = 1
        others           = 2.
    check sy-subrc = 0.
If this still doesnt resolve the issue then you will have to debug the transfer queue stopping at function CRM_SALESDOC_MAP_BAPI2MBDOC to see why the data is not mapped.
I hope this helps,
Kind regards,
Vanessa.

Cross-company-code billing (Thid party) in FI

Hi,
We have configured SD part for Cross-company-code billing (third party). This process is about delivering products to the customer from one company (company code A) and billing customer from another company (company code B) with intercompany invoice from delivering company to Invoicing company.
Could you help me with FI GL accounting postings that should occur in the process?
We have tested it so far and I think that there are some postings missing. Currently GL potings for this process are:
Delivery from company code A to customer:                 STOCK: Ct, COGS: Dt
Customer invoice from company code B to customer:   Revenue: Ct, Customer: Dt, VAT: Dt
Intercompany postings: in company code A:                 IC Revenue: Ct, Cusomer (comp. code B) Dt
I think there is a document missing in Intercompny on Company code B site. I suppose it should be:
IC expenses Dt, Vendor (comp code A): Ct.
Am I right and if yes - how can I configure this automated postning during IC invoicing on IC vendor site?
Thank you,
Karol
Edited by: Karol on Feb 15, 2010 11:34 PM
Edited by: Karol on Feb 16, 2010 9:42 AM

Dear Neil,
There is a concept in FI to maitain "Automatic Posting Clearing Accounts between Company codes". (Check transaction BUV in TCode OBYA)
After you observe the TCode, you can understand the following draft.
-- One Posting transaction (for example with posting key 86 "GR/IR Debit") is posted against a cost object. Based on the configuration mentioned above, automatically the same transaction will be posted as (96 "GER/IR Credit") in the partner company code against the cost object.
-- The Same GL account acts as Credit GL for one Company code & as a Debit GL for the other, preferably.
Now, if the cost on your WBSE comes in the business process / development cycle test due to these features, & if you want to bill the customer based on these sources, then you need to configure the mentioned scenario with the help of your FI consultant first & can then check RRB process
regards

Tax Classification under Item Billing tab is missing

Hi Gurus,
When a particular Sales Order Type is chosen, under item level under billing tab, there is no such field of Tax Classification for the user to key in the tax classification field.
However, if reference using another invoice no to create same Sales Order Type, the tax classification appear.
Please revert how to set tax classification to be available.

Hi,
This is how Tax is determined in the sales order line item.
You have 2 settings to do in Customer Master & Material Master.
Customer Master -
Tx: XD02
Go to "Sales Area Data" section and check "Billing" tab
There you can see "Taxes" area.
You have to maintain "Tax Classification" based on the country.
Material Master
Tx: MM02
Check "Sales: Sales Org. Data 1" tab and "Tax Data" section
You have to maintain "Tax Classification" based on the country there also.
Now you have to maintain Tax master record in VK11.
If you feel it's already maintained, go to VK12 & enter your Tax condition type there. Without pressing ENTER Key, press "Condition lnformation" button option on the top.
You'll come to a report selection screen.
Set BLANK to all fields there, including validity periods.
Execute
Now check whether you can find a record there, based on you country,
(Eg: if it's MWST, you have 3 areas,
1 - Departure Country / Destination Country
2 - Domestic Taxes
3 - Export Taxes
If you don't find a record for your combination, go to VK11 & create a new condition record.
Then start from beginning.
Should be able to see "Tax classific." now in the LI billing tab.
Best regards,
Anupa

No tax information exists for billing document

Hi
We have a problem. In our scenario, we create a service order followed by service confirmation and bill from service confirmation. All prices including taxes are maintained in r/3. prices and taxes are picked in the service confirmation also.
When we create an invoice from crm (CRM billing), the correct price and tax is picked . But when we try to maintain billing documents, we get an error as follows.
" No tax information exists for billing document 90000108-0000000010, condition type JIVC". Document are not getting posted to R/3.
JIVC is the tax condition type created in r/3 and downloaded to crm. GL account determination settings have been maintained in CRM.
However when i do a billing in CRM without tax, accounting documents are generated and hitting the right GL account. Also, when we do a billing in in r/3, the tax is hitting the right GL account.
I have not maintained any TTE settings in CRM. Are TTE settings required at all in this scenario? If so could you inform what needs to be done.?
We are on CRM 5.0 and R/3 4.7.
Thanks and regards
Bhaskaran

Hi Bhaskaran,
In CRM according to the taxes there r two ways of calculation,
in ur scenario u r using the R3 billing so it according to downloading of condition types and cond records it will shows the taxes in the invoice
if u r maining u need to call the TTE
i hope u r with indian client if follow in backend
check these settings in R3
TAXINN (India):
Following are the condition types:
Define New Condition Type
IMG > Sales and Distribution > Basic Functions > Pricing > Pricing Control > Define Condition Types > Maintain Condition Types (V/06)
T.Code - Details of Condition Types
V/06 JIVP copy of JLST (A/R VAT Payable) & change condition category to D & Access Sequence MWST
V/06 JIVC copy of JLST (A/R CST Payable VAT) & change condition category to D & Access Sequence MWST
OBQ1 - JIVP copy of JLST (A/R VAT Payable)
OBQ1 - JIVC copy of JLST (A/R CST Payable VAT)
Define Account Key JN6,JN7 & JN8 (T.Code: OBCN & also in SD)
IMG> Financial Accounting> Taxes on Sales and Purchases> Basic Setting> Check & change setting for Tax Processing (OBCN)
IMG> Sales & Distribution> Basic Function> Account Assignment / Costing> Revenue Account Determination> Define & assign Account Keys> Define Account Keys.
and check the proper condition records r downloaded or not check middleware settings for that.
If u r doing CRM billing i am not sure of indian client, as i know u need to do maintain the Pricing procedure in CRM also and u have to call the TTE
Regards
Manohar

Export Tax(Vat) based on Bill to party

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for