Exposure change in upload?

I have no presets marked to run(that I know of), and my raw images look great, but the first time I look at them individually, they change a full stop brighter... What is going on! I correctly expose each image and am having to overhaul them in LR. Please help!
Jenny

There may be a camera setting like a light optimiser etc that Lightroom isn't able to access, but I'm not familiar enough with the D300s to say. You could also have a default setting through the 'Set Default..' option that becomes available when you hold down the Alt/Option key in Develop-this turns the Reset button at the bottom of the right panel into the Set Default button. You can restore the original defaults from there.

Similar Messages

Exposure Changing During Upload?

First, I'm new to Aperture and so this may be how it was designed. Every time I upload RAW images to Aperture 3.2, it darkens them during the processing that occurs directly after the import is finished. I can actually see all the pictures darkening in thumbnail view while it processes them, just like if I had messed with an images exposure then stamped all the others in the event with that adjustment at once. No adjustment presets are applied during import.
I'm using a Nikon D90, if that makes any difference.
Thanks!
P.S: here are some pictures illustrating the problem, I know they're nasty, but I just wanted something quick for an illustration:
Before import:
After import:

Bit of advice, NEVER rely on your LCD for decisions, the variables in lighting that effect the way your LCD displays an image are enourmous.
Learn to use and rely on your cameras histogram, you will find that this does match closely to Aperture.
If you really want to get super accurate try the following
Ensuring your exposure is sitting where you want it on the histogram in camera and then comparing that to the histogram in Aperture is your first step in this process of getting things to reproduce correctly. Try grey, white and black cards in the one image, setting your exposure from a spot reading on the grey card. this will give you three disctinct and clear lines on your histogram that you can use to compare your cameras LCD histogram and Apertures histogram
Tony

Smooth jerky exposure changes in Premiere Elements 13

Folks - can anyone tell me how to smooth jerky exposure changes caused by the automatic camera settings (temporal smoothing) over a video clip? (Can't seem to find the temporal setting in Premiere Elements 13).

AndyD74
Thanks for the follow up replies.
Your Edit Menu/Project Settings/General readings suggest that you or the project have not set the correct project preset for the project. If the Canon is the major source of your Timeline content, then the project should not be 1080i (the project's default). It should be
NTSC
DSLR
1080p
DSLR [email protected]
You are going to have to go to a new project to correct that situation. You cannot change the project preset in 13/13.1 once the project preset has been established.
If the project (automatically) is not giving you the correct project preset, then you need to set it yourself (manually) before you import the source media.
File Menu/New/Project and Change Settings
In Change Settings, set for the project preset mentioned above. OK out of there.
In the New Project dialog that appears, rename the project and make sure there is a check mark next to "Force Selected Project Setting on This Project". OK out of there.
Then in the workspace, import your source media with Add Media/
Another factor is the custom made intro that I created in Aurora3d Title Animation. What are its properties and how do they compare with those of the Canon's 1080p29.97. If you remove the Title Animation from the Timeline, do the problems disappear even with the DSLR project preset pointed to?
Please review and consider.
Thank you.
ATR

How to fix exposure changes made by Photoshop during panorama creation?

Hi There,
I have a panorama created by Photoshop but need to tweak some of the joins which is not an issue. But when I paint out/paint in objects from different layers, I've noticed that the exposure within the same layer has been changed by photoshop which creates a line.
It's like photoshop applied exposure changes to the visible parts of the layer after blending - instead of applying them to the entire layer before blending?
See the image below, that boat is all on the same layer but there's a line through the middle - how do I gain access to the exposure changes so I can paint/blend that line?
Any pointers in the right direction would be much appreciated.
Cheers

the .xmp files are only generated if the file you are working on doesn't support metadata but JPG files support it so the information is written inside them. If you want to "flatten" the file so that the pixel information gets changed then you will have to resave the files which isn't something that you should do very often with JPG files (preferably only once).
To mass save files you can either select them and go to Tools->Photoshop->Image Processor (but this will launch Photoshop) or open them up in Camera Raw, select all of them in the film strip and select Save Images

Adjusting and matching time lapse exposure changes? (without deleting photo's)

Ok I am fairly sure there is no way around this but to do it manually... but just in case someone else knows a better way...
What's the best way to compensate for exposure changes captured during a long time lapse? (without deleting any images) (eg. a full day time lapse taken on a cloudy/sunny day)
Here's some more details...
I recently set up a 6hr indoor stadium time lapse during a cloudy/sunny day. All the settings were set to manual so that shutter (for motion blur), ISO, aperture (for depth of field) and white balance were consistent. I shot it in raw and it looks good... BUT every time the sun is covered by a cloud the exposure drops way down causing an overall 'exposure flicker' type effect when you put it all together.
So after searching for a while, I ended up manually adjusting over 1000 photo's, tweaking the exposure and eyeballing the histogram to be consistent (as 'Match total Exposures' didn't work in this manual mode instance). The result is 10x better, BUT I would love to be able to automate this process somehow as it would save me hours upon hours... any ideas? Any simpler ways?
The only automated solution I can think of at the moment is to set the camera to shutter priority in the future, but I'm not sure if the aperture / depth of field changes would cause problems when doing this.
Thanks for any ideas! I'm always learning and appreciate any input!

Codebreaker3 wrote:
I'm not sure that you will get good results if you try to normalise the exposure when dealing with large changes in luminance e.g. clouds moving in because that's the way the scene is at that time.
I understand what you mean, but in my case adjusting the overall exposures to be roughly the same made a huge difference and made the overall timelapse much better... 'smoother', less flickery to watch... it was probably because this time lapse was taken in an indoor stadium so the overall environment wasn't changing like it would in a cloud or nature timelapse. The problem was just that the overall stadium exposure would change according to the weather/clouds outside the stadium. I haven't heard of the Granite Bay Software so thanks for that link... I have tried LRTimelapse and it has a great feature to reduce the exposure changes for long term timelapses, but it also involves removing the images which have extreme exposure changes which is not what I wanted in this instance, I needed every image to remain in the timelapse. I think the manual method unfortunately is the best bet for this sceneriao, but I really appreciate all the ideas and suggestions!

How can I change Mobile Uploads to ios

how can I change Mobile Uploads to ios

Sorry, Apple has no approved method to downgrade the version of iOS on your iDevice. You can voice your displeasure with the iOS by leaving feedback at the appropriate subsection from the link below.
http://www.apple.com/feedback/

Can the case be changed while uploading the data or after uploading ????

hi all ,
can u pls help me ??? can the case of the data in a itab be changed while running the program? the data is uploaded to an internal table and then based on loop at that itab the conditions will evaluate to give the result.... but the problem is like wen the data is given in small letters the worste(last) condition is executing even the data satisfies the condtion which is not supposed to happen. this is due to case sensitive problem ...can u pls help me ....can the case be changed while uploading the data r after uploading ????

this is the itab declaration ..
data: begin of it_input occurs 0 ,
       tra          like tstc-tcode,
     end of it_input.
and then from the uploaded data the prog should check wheather it is having any userexits or not ...
here comes the code...
sort it_input by tra.
delete adjacent duplicates from it_input .
loop at it_input.
           it_itab-sno = sy-tabix.
select single * from tstc where tcode eq it_input-tra.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
    select single devclass from tadir into v_devclass
             where pgmid = 'R3TR'
                    and object = 'PROG'
                    and obj_name = tstc-pgmna.
         if sy-subrc ne 0.
         select single * from trdir where name = tstc-pgmna.
         if trdir-subc eq 'F'.
            select single * from tfdir where pname = tstc-pgmna.
            select single * from enlfdir where funcname =
            tfdir-funcname.
            select single * from tadir where pgmid = 'R3TR'
                               and object = 'FUGR'
                               and obj_name eq enlfdir-area.
         move : tadir-devclass to v_devclass.
          endif.
       endif.
       select * from tadir into table jtab
                     where pgmid = 'R3TR'
                       and object = 'SMOD'
                       and devclass = v_devclass.
       if sy-subrc = 0.
        select single * from tstct where sprsl eq sy-langu and
                                        tcode eq it_input-tra.
                  if not jtab[] is initial.
           loop at jtab.
                select single modtext from modsapt into str
                     where sprsl = sy-langu and
                            name = jtab-obj_name.
                it_itab-tra        = it_input-tra.
                it_itab-i_obj_name = jtab-obj_name.
                it_itab-i_modtext = str.
                append it_itab.
                str = ''.
           endloop.
          endif.
        else.
                it_itab-tra        = it_input-tra .
                it_itab-i_obj_name = ' '.
                it_itab-i_modtext = 'No user Exit exists'.
                 append it_itab.
        endif.
      else.
                it_itab-tra        = it_input-tra .
                it_itab-i_obj_name = ' '.
                it_itab-i_modtext = 'Transaction Code Does Not Exist'.
                 append it_itab.
      endif.
endloop.

Long delay on exposure change

I'm building application with Creative WebCam Notebook Ultra using DirectShow.
In my application I change exposure property programmatically. Unfortunately, it takes abnormally long time until the new exposure takes effect. Ater exposure change, the application obtains from 4 to 8 frames with old exposure, and only then a jump to new exposure occurs.
With other cameras (Genius, ASUS) the exposure changes immediately: the first frame after the change comes with new exposure.
Is that delay normal in Creative camera? Is it a way to reduce the delay?

I'm building application with Creative WebCam Notebook Ultra using DirectShow.
In my application I change exposure property programmatically. Unfortunately, it takes abnormally long time until the new exposure takes effect. Ater exposure change, the application obtains from 4 to 8 frames with old exposure, and only then a jump to new exposure occurs.
With other cameras (Genius, ASUS) the exposure changes immediately: the first frame after the change comes with new exposure.
Is that delay normal in Creative camera? Is it a way to reduce the delay?

Any way to batch gradual exposure change?

I make time lapses and there is a very common frustration where flicker is created by small exposure changes due to the aperture blades not falling in the same position or when using an auto mode where exposure changes and the camera changes exposure values. To problem is worsened when doing a time lapse during sunset/sunrise when one expects the exposure to change drastically but needs to compensate in order to get the entire scene.
I've experimented with using Lightroom's "Match Total Exposures" feature which is great at adjusting the exposure to even out the discrepancies between changing exposure values. But this doesn't take into account the exposure of the scene is expected to change. So when doing this for a sunset, as I increase the shutter speed to account for the setting sun, Match Total Exposures adds negative EV because it recognizes the longer shutter speed would be over exposing the selected "correct" photograph.
I would very much like to find a way to use the Match Total Exposures feature to first even out the exposure changes from the changing parameters, and then apply a batch gradual exposure change to the series so that it will know to allow for these changing lighting conditions.
Lightroom is great for adjusting individual photos or for a series under the same lighting conditions using (sync settings and match total exposures) but with changing lighting conditions is would be great to have the ability to gradually adjust values, not just exposure but other tone values.

You can probably fairly easily modify the script here.

Font changing after upload

I am having a problem with a swf file that we are using for a
splash page for a bands website. It is a simple page with some
audio and two links. The problem I'm having is the font and the
sizing of things changed after they were uploaded to the server. I
tested the file with two different browsers before e-mailing it to
the production company, and everthing worked fine. Any help would
be greatly appreciated!
thanks
-g

Hi
This is a very common problem and very easy to fix.
The problem is that the font your using is not available on
the machine(s) being used to view the webpage.
To get round this problem all you have to do is select the
items in the Flash IDE individually and select Embed
Choose Uppercase. Lowercase, Numerals and any special
characters you need.
Republish and hey-presto Browser content correctly
formatted.

How do i change simultaneous uploads in iWeb?

'm having problems publishing my website and was advised to change the iweb simultaneous uploads settings. But how do I do this? And is this possible? Many thanks!

If you are using iWeb '08 as stated, you will be publishing to a local folder and uploading using an FTP application...
http://www.iwebformusicians.com/Search-Engine-Optimization/Upload.html
Make sure you empty the browser cache before visiting the published site. In Safari do - Option/Command/E
See this page for more info about publishing...
http://www.iwebformusicians.com/iWeb/Publish-Website.html

Change from UPLOAD to GUI_UPLOAD function module

pls let me know that wat are the changes that should be made if the report currently using UPLOAD function module and it should be replaced with GUI_UPLOAD function module ..
wat should be the TYPE of file name and File type ???????? with the respect to changes ....
thanks . in advance..

Check out this thread to find the answer
UPLOAD and GUI_UPLOAD
Regards,
Santosh

Color and quality of photo changes once uploaded to online printing galleries (like Shutterfly).

The photos are RGB. Shutterfly can't figure out why and says there must be some error in the file when it is saved. Does anyone have a reason and/or solution? The portion of the photo on the left is edited, the one on the right is how the image looks once uploaded. It happens to every single photo.
I saved for web and uploaded again and the color looks a little better, but still not right. The one on the right is the correct original:
If photo looks blurry please click on it- not sure what is going on with that either!

The way I work is as follows (my screens are colour hardware calibrated):
- create the image
- convert the image with the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 colour profile, set to perceptual rendering
- export to web with sRGB profile embedded (optional)
The last step makes no difference in colour when you view the final results (with or without embedded colour profile) in either IE or Opera: they are identical. In FF and Chrome it does affect the colour quality, with the embedded profile version more correct looking.
And I would argue AGAINST turning on that option in Firefox, because you are isolating yourself from the rest of the world: at least then you will be aware of the slight colour change, while with the option turned on you cannot know.
I tend to disagree with this workflow - it means pretty much no-one except you will be able to see the image as intended, because no-one is going to activate that option in Firefox. And what about other browsers?
Of course you have no control over how everybody else's systems are set up, but that's not your problem, it's theirs.
Disagree. While you cannot control the setup of others, I am of the opinion we should try our best to provide the best quality, and therefore we should be aware of these issues while we work with and preview our imagery on the web. It feels to me as if this is an ostrich approach: hiding your head in the sand, and hoping the problem goes away.
To learn more about how specific browsers deal with color profiles and untagged images, check out:
http://cameratico.com/tools/web-browser-color-management-test/
As for ShutterFly: I just did some testing of my own, and it seems Shutterfly does not care one bit whether a jpg has an embedded sRGB profile or not. I uploaded both versions of mine (embedded and no sRGB profile), and checked the generated thumbnails with this:
Jeffrey's Exif viewer
It tells me the processed thumbnails have no profile embedded, so it becomes a crap shoot what the output (printed) quality will be like - you cannot trust the colours in their thumbnails/previews in a browser, because the OS and the browser will have to handle those untagged images.
It seems the best you can hope for with ShutterFly is to upload your images after you converted them with the sRGB profile in your image editor (Photoshop, Photoline, etc) and exporting the JPGs with an embedded sRGB profile.

App for PC to allow download of a Pages File, make changes and upload again

Is there an app I can purchase for my PC to allow me to download a Numbers file from iCloud and work on it in Pages, so I can make changes to it and re-upload it to iCloud? I do realize that one can down a Numbers file into Excel or PDF on a PC, however it does not allow upload of a new file into the Cloud after changes are made to that downloaded document.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
p

couldn't you export from Pages ans MSWord, modify on PC, then open again in Pages?

NEF files only allow for exposure changes in CS2

Hi
When I open a NEF file (this happened with both D50 and D200 cameras) they only open a small raw box that allows me to change just exposure.
When I had a Canon 20D the raw files would open a big box where I could change EVERYTHING and included a preview screen, but I just dont have this for my Nikon files.
Any ideas?
Thanks
And

To expand on Jeff's message, the Nikon PS plug-in is installed automatically when you install Nikon software. To get ACR, you need to remove or disable (rename, changing the extension) the Nikon plug-in and properly install Adobe Camera Raw, per the installations on the ACR download page.
Art

Exposure change in upload?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for