FAS2240 - Datastore Usage very different to Volume Usage.

Hi,We have a VMware datastore configured on our FAS2240. I'm getting an alert on our monitoring system due to usage of a particular volume. The volume in question shows 86% utilised and the LUN at 97% within System Manager, this is also reflected within VSC. However, the datastore itself, i.e. what VMware is seeing, is only 31% used.My question is, why would there be such a difference between these figures? Is there any way to tell what is utilising this space? There are no snapshots in play.We have other volumes configured in the same way with similar VDI load and there is nowhere near as much difference between these figures.Many thanks.

Hi Radek,The Fractional Reserve setting is disabled by the looks of it.Here's the output of the df -r command.FAS2240-02> df -rFilesystem kbytes used avail reserved Mounted on/vol/vol0/ 199229440 3880512 195348928 0 /vol/vol0//vol/vol0/.snapshot 10485760 237508 10248252 0 /vol/vol0/.snapshot/vol/v_vdi_datastore9/ 432402476 186069996 246332480 0 /vol/v_vdi_datastore9//vol/v_vdi_datastore9/.snapshot 0 0 0 0 /vol/v_vdi_datastore9/.snapshot/vol/v_vdi_view_datastore9/ 70265404 12336924 57928480 0 /vol/v_vdi_view_datastore9//vol/v_vdi_view_datastore9/.snapshot 0 0 0 0 /vol/v_vdi_view_datastore9/.snapshot/vol/v_vdi_datastore10/ 432402476 384968280 47434196 0 /vol/v_vdi_datastore10//vol/v_vdi_datastore10/.snapshot 0 0 0 0 /vol/v_vdi_datastore10/.snapshot/vol/v_vdi_view_datastore10/ 70265404 11059304 59206100 0 /vol/v_vdi_view_datastore10//vol/v_vdi_view_datastore10/.snapshot 0 0 0 0 /vol/v_vdi_view_datastore10/.snapshot

Similar Messages

Use of SQL Profiles where each schema has very different data distribution and volumes

Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.3.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
Our architecture has multiple client schemas in the same database. Each schema has the same code base (tables, procedures etc) but each client's data is very different in terms of volumes and skew/distribution per table. This architecture was done based on cost - I know it's not ideal but it can't change.....
I am fairly seasoned with performance management and so know the usual tricks of when to eat up the table using parallel full table scans etc. I couldn't further optimise a given stmt for our largest table. I'll call it TSPCI and it has monthly partitions (2 years) and totals about 35Gb in the largest client schema.
Anyway, I was surprised when ADDM suggested that I could achieve 98% improvement if I were to use a given SQL Profile. Great?
So, here's my issue - I've found that the same SQL_ID is shared across all those different client schemas: I can't see how to get it to pick/use the SQL Profile in only a particular client schema - let's call it NEX - and not in another (lets call it COL).
If I generate a SQL Profile as NEX, has it analysed and built the SQL Profile based on the NEX schema and is it therefore invalid/undesirable to have that SQL Profile used in the COL schema??
I suppose that I could add a small change (say /*+ NEX */) to the SQL in the NEX schema to make the given sql unique there and then generate a SQL Profile for that..........
What am I missing here?

Well, I can confirm the behaviour: accept a SQL Profile for a given SQL in one schema and verified that it is used in another schema (where the data volume and distribution is very different).
I can also confirm the workaround - simply add a hint to the SQL to make it unique such that I could use different sql profiles for the otherwise exact same sql in different schemas.
I'm happy enough with this workaround but I'll leave this thread unanswered in case someone can suggest a better approach.

Nokia Lumia 1020 Very Low Earpiece Volume

Hi
My Nokia Lumia 1020 has very low earpiece volume. At even maximum volume one can find it really hard to hear. I have brushed off any dust etc.. but still the problem persists. I have also read other users facing similar problems. What a pity that such a great phone cannot fulfil basic purpose of having a phone. What's the solution as I want to switch back to Samsung note 3.

Hi, hugosilver and kleo1712.
Welcome to the Nokia Support Discussions!
To help us isolate the issue, you can not hear the person on the other line, the person on the other line cannot hear you, or the audio quality is poor when in call? There are several fixes that you can try to possibly resolve whichever the exact issue you have with your phone is. See: http://www.nokia.com/ph-en/support/product/lumia1020/troubleshooter/?categories=Audio%20and%20sound,.... (Note: The provided link is intended for customers who are located in the Phiippines. If in case you are from a different region, go here: http://www.nokia.com/global/support/locations/, select your region, your phone model, and then "Troubleshooting".)
In case you have other questions, just let us know. All the best!

While editing a scanned pdf, Acrobat will not recognize the current font & change to very different font. How can I choose the font I want to match the current document?

While editing a scanned pdf, Acrobat will not recognize the current font & change to very different font. How can I choose the font I want to match the current document?

Thanks for answering. The version is XI.0.10. I just did the update yesterday hoping that I could now properly edit a scanned pdf document. Yes, it's happening on most all scanned documents. I followed your steps & found the list of fonts used in the document & then attempted to edit. The same occurs. When I type in a correction, I get an error alert... "the original font (in this case Fd 5805) is not available or can't be used in editing. Acrobat is using the font Minion Pro in its place."
When I select the text & right click as you suggested, my only choices are cut, copy, delete or select all, no "edit text".
I have no other options to choose another font. Thanks for any help you can direct my way.
Debbie
From: sukritd15 <[email protected]>
To: Deborah Karr <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:35 AM
Subject: While editing a scanned pdf, Acrobat will not recognize the current font & change to very different font. How can I choose the font I want to match the current document?
While editing a scanned pdf, Acrobat will not recognize the current font & change to very different font. How can I choose the font I want to match the current document?
created by sukritd15 in Creating, Editing & Exporting PDFs - View the full discussionHi Deborah , I would like to know couple of things before I assist you further.1.Which version of Acrobat are you using ?2.Is it happening for all the scanned PDF' or any particular PDF? You can try these steps,Launch the scanned PDF >right click >Document Properties(from the drop down list) >Fonts(on the dialog box)>From here you will get the fonts used in that PDF . While editing the PDF ,select the text that are editing or typing in with the help of selection tool .After you select the text ,right click on the text and choose "edit text" from the drop down list .From there you will be able to choose the desired font . RegardsSukrit Dhingra If the reply above answers your question, please take a moment to mark this answer as correct by visiting: https://forums.adobe.com/message/7190881#7190881 and clicking ‘Correct’ below the answer Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed an image in your message please visit the thread in the forum and click the camera icon: https://forums.adobe.com/message/7190881#7190881 To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at , click "Following" at the top right, & "Stop Following" Start a new discussion in Creating, Editing & Exporting PDFs by email or at Adobe Community For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1516624.

Please, the battery of my mac air does not last more than two hours, it's been over 30 days I sent for technical assistance and nothing! I am very disappointed with the mac air, I had a very different expectation of apples products!!

Please, the battery of my mac air does not last more than two hours, it's been over 30 days I sent for technical assistance and nothing! I am very disappointed with the mac air, I had a very different expectation of apples products!!!

Maybe the problem is not your MB Air......
Try these:
Make sure bluetooth is turned off if you're not using it.
Set your screen brightness to 4 bars.
See what's loading in your login items. Delete the ones you don't need.
Open Activity Monitor - under All Processes see what's using most of your CPU's resources.
Highlight the ones with the highest %CPU and hit quit process.
Remember that when Apple says that your battery should last 7 hours, they tested it just browsing the web and not have anything open in the background and screen is set at 50% brightness.

 Ps installation on two different boot volumes of same machine?  Ps 11.0.2 Mac PPC  and then...

Hello, I'm new to this forum.
My goal here is to have two different Photoshop 11.0.2 installations on two different boot volumes of one and the same Power Mac (PPC) G5 Quad, one being a Tiger 10.4.11 system and the other one a Leopard 10.5.8 system, for the purpose of installing two different modalities of the same Epson Photo Stylus 2200 printer, one with the printer set to use the photo black ink cartridge for luster and glossy papers, and the other one using the matte blank ink.
This is because I prefer to simply change the startup disk when switching inks rather than having to delete and re-add the necessary printers. (This particular printer does not support ink cartridge switching under any version of Mac OS X.)
Photoshop is currently only used on this one machine. Obviously this intended scheme fits well within the EULA conditions.
My three questions are:
(a) whether there is any technical issue I have failed to consider,
(b) whether each copy of Photoshop on the same machine will have to be activated separately (in other words, is the activation tied to the CPU or to the boot volume drive?), and
(c) if the answer to the latter question is yes, whether this will count as one or two activations for purposes of later installing a single instance of the Photoshop 13.x ("CS6") upgrade on an Intel- MacBook, since obviously C6 will not run on my PPC Mac. Again in sum, will I be able to continue to run Photoshop 11.0.2 on two different volumes of the same PPC machine and the Photoshop 13.x upgrade on the laptop?
As further explanation, I would use Photoshop 13.x on the Mac-Intel laptop only in order to run ACR 7.x, but would keep my PPC G5 Quad as my photo editing and printing machine running Photoshop 11.0.2, since an upgrade of my desktop machine to a comparably powerful Mac Pro is simply not an option for both financial and technical reasons (the Classic environment is essential).
Any and all input and guidance will be appreciated.
Message was edited by: station_one

Thank you for the lightning-fast response—and on a Sunday morning too!
MichaelKazlow wrote:
…Is it technically a violation, that is something I'd leave Adobe to answer.
From my previous visits to other forums as a lurker, I was under the firm impression you were in fact an Adobe employee, Mr. Kazlow. I hope that is still the case and you are only referencing your participation in these user-to-user forums as a volunteer, not as an official representative of the corporation.
Much obliged.

New version of iTunes has bug i.e. downloaded mp3 has very different title than original

When I import the downloaded mp3 the title is very different and offensive words. What is up with this? thnx

mfromevergreen wrote:
How do I reply? thnx
You just did reply.
Type words and click Reply.

Two very different results using the same settings (H.264 / Quicktime Pro)

I’m a bit confused, I have used Quicktime Pro (v7.1) to encode DV into H.264 for iPod and this particular video is 18 minutes long and came out looking very good with the following settings;
VIDEO: H.264 at 200kbps, Baseline Profile, 25fps, Auto Key Frames, 320x240 or 640x480, Multipass Best quality encoding.
AUDIO: AAC Audio at 96kbps, 24kHz sampling freq, Stereo.
However here is the twist…
When I use the same exact settings to encode just the 30 second opener (from the 18 minute video) the encoded opener looks bad and blocky!
Why? Same settings would make you assume that you should get a same or similar result, or am I wrong?
The reason I have tried encoding this 30 second opener is that I am trying to work out which settings work best on the iPod (another issue) and I don’t want to spend hours test encoding the full 18 minute video, as you know H.264 is SLOW to encode!
So can anyone help in regard to two very different results using the same settings?
Regards,
J
PC Windows XP

Alvin,
Is it a commercially-released or home-burned CD?
If it's commercially-released, try "encouraging" the recalcitrant computer by using the iTunes Advanced menu > Get CD Track Names command when it shows Audio CD.
If it's home-burned, you will find that only the computer that actually burned the disc will know what's on it. The information won't be transferred to another computer.
Let us know which, if either, of these situations applies to you.

Bookmarks.html Renders Very Differently in FireFox 4

For years, I have been using and loving Firefox (including 4.0).
For years, I have also exported my bookmarks out of Firefox and use the resulting bookmarks.html file as my home page.
Now Firefox 4 renders the bookmarks.html file very differently from previous versions of Firefox and also differently from other browsers (eg, IE).
The indentations have disappeared when viewing bookmarks.html in Firefox 4. Unfortunately, it's not really easy to show you this inside this forum text box, but I will try.
Firefox 4 shows something like this:
'''Bookmarks Menu'''
'''General Interest'''
Markham Weather Forecast - Environment Canada
The Weather Network - Markham
The Weather Channel - Markham
AccuWeather.com - Canadian Forecast Center
... etc
Firefox 3.6, IE, and other browsers show something like this (note the indentations which greatly improve readability):
'''Bookmarks Menu'''
'''General Interest'''
Markham Weather Forecast - Environment Canada
The Weather Network - Markham
The Weather Channel - Markham
AccuWeather.com - Canadian Forecast Center
... etc
Is this a bug in Firefox 4?? I would really like to see bookmarks.html rendered with the indentations.
Am I missing something?
Thanks.

'''Cor-el''' - is there a way that can be added to the bookmarks.html file, instead of having to click on a bookmarklet each time the page is opened?

Travelling I have very different downoad speed. How to avoid loading mobile version on the slow speed?

I have to work in very different circumstances, sometimes I have very slow download speed. Then downloaded sites suddenly changes their look, as I understand, browser is switching to mobile phone download version. Can I prevent this?

Look at the posts closely:might not be needed if formatted ;)
create or replace procedure splitsms as
begin
insert into scott.smssplit (r,c,s,tc,na,tc2,na2,tc3,na3,tc4,na4,wther,sno)
select substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,1,2) r,
         substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,3,2) c,
         substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,5,1) s,
         substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,6,3) tc,
         substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,9,3) na,
         substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,12,3) tc2,
         substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,15,3) na2,
         substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,18,3) tc3,
         substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,21,3) na3,
         substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,24,3) tc4,
         substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,27,3) na4,
         substr(rcstcnatcnatcnatcnawther,30,10) wther,
         sno
    from scott.sms1 a
   where sno = (select max(sno)
                  from sms1
                 where sno != a.sno
               ); ---------------> added where clause with table alias.
end;Regards
Etbin

Lumetri Looks look very different between SG and PPro

Trying to create Looks in SG and use them as an effect directly appled to a clip(s) in PPro. Works just fine except what you see in SG is vastly different than what you get in PPro, color-wise. The clips are 8 bit HDV so some banding issues can occur-to be expected if I 'push' to far. But this is really different, i.e. what appears grayish in SG is really yellowish in PPro, colors very different. Any ideas?

First off there is a bug in the print dialog box with regards to the " proof" profile name and color preview. Make sure that if you change the proof set-up profile you also have to go to the proof set-up portion in the print dialog and re select the " current custom set-up" profile. This bug is completely adding to the confusing complexity of the print dialog box and is clearly in dire need of a complete overhaul.
Make sure the "match print colors" is checked as well to display the correct output to your device.
To answer your question...
>How can I get the workspace preview to match the Print dialog preview (which matches the printout better)?
In the proof set-up select the profile you want to apply in the " device to simulate" drop down. Select the rendering intent and if you want BPC as well. Make sure you select " Simulate paper color". Observe the preview and click OK.
Go to the print dialog and select " Photoshop manages color" - select your custom printer profile as well as applying the same rendering intent that you selected in the proof set-up - and if you are using BPC as well. Again, make sure you have "match print colors" checked. Also make sure you are not managing color in the printer driver as this will just double manage color and makes things more confusing.
Your working space preview in proof set up mode and your print dialog preview should match now - if not, go complain to Adobe about the retarded print features they offer...
As far as I'm concerned, they are completely lost in development as of now.

Printing using Proof settings results in very different output from Shop vs ID

Shop and InDesign come out with very different color values using the same settings when printing with Proof Settings. Anyone know why, or which is correct? Here's my scenario:
1. In the color settings for both apps I turn off Black Point Compensation, Use Dither and Compensate for Scene referred profiles (some are Shop only obviously). Other than that it is default settings.
2. I create a CMYK document with 4 squares. Filled with 100% Cyan, 100% Magenta, 100% Yellow, and 100% Black respectively. Setup the Working CMYK in both apps to Coated Forga27.
4. I setup a Custom Proof condition with an ISO Uncoated Yellowish CMYK profile. Preserve CMYK Numbers and Black point compensation are both unchecked.
5. In the Print engine I set Color Management to Use Proof settings, Color handling done by the application, and leave the Printer profile set to the CMYK working space (Coated Forga27), and Output Color as Composite CMYK in ID. Black Point compensation is also unchecked here.
6. Now when I print to file and Distill (job settings set to leave color unchanged and compression is off) the resulting files from both apps here is what I get:
InDesign CS4:
Cyan square (C:84 M:14.6 Y:0 K:0 ), Magenta square (C:2.9 M:84.9 Y:14.1 K:0 ), Yellow square (C:0 M:6.2 Y:84.1 K:0 ), Black square (C:67 M:62.75 Y:56.86 K:46.28 )
PhotoShop CS4:
Cyan square (C:92.94 M:12.55 Y:5.49 K:0 ), Magenta square (C:5.49 M:94.51 Y:13.73 K:0 ), Yellow square (C:0 M:5.49 Y:92.94 K:0 ), Black square (C:83.14 M:85.49 Y:78.04 K:98.82 )
Needless to say the results are very different. I went ahead and did some manual Profile -> Profile conversions in Shop to see what is happening and it seems like Shop is doing a conversion from the Documents assigned CMYK ->Proofing CMYK-> Printer CMYK. But Shop adds black point compensation in automatically for the final portion of the color conversion (Proofing CMYK-> Printer CMYK) even if it is unchecked in the color settings, Proofing dialog, and the print engine.
InDesign has an entirely different way of "using Proof settings". It seems that if you choose Use Proof Settings in the print engine it just assigns Proof CMYK to the document and Converts that to Printer CMYK. Document CMYK is ignored completely. Verified this through manual conversions in Shop as well.
What gives? Which do we trust? To me it sounds like PhotoShop is doing the closest to what I would expect.. except for the addition of the sneaky black point compensation without being told to do so. Thoughts?
Matt

Before digging too far, I need to understand what you're trying to achieve.
With the print settings you describe you are instructing the application to perform two conversions. The color chain is Document CMYK (FOGRA27) – Proof CMYK (ISO Uncoated) – Document CMYK (FOGRA27).
This is a little odd. Usually the final color space is a print device of some sort, not a press profile. This workflow you describe is a round trip of sorts. We are at FOGRA, convert to ISO, now back to FOGRA. That amounts to simulating one press condition using another press condition, which is rarely done because a press in not a proof device.
The Proof profile is the print condition you want to simulate. The Print profile is the device doing the simulation, which is often referred to as a proofing device (quite confusing but that's the way it is).
Photoshop Proof Setup has a Rendering Intent and BPC. InDesign Proof Setup does not.
In the Photoshop print dialog, there is a Simulate Black Ink option. The InDesign print dialog does not have this option.
There are two conversions on output. In Photoshop output, the first conversion is Document – Proof. The rendering and BPC options for this first conversion are based on Photoshop color settings. The second conversion is Proof - Printer. The Photoshop print dialog offers 3 options for this 2nd conversion:
1. Simulate Black Ink Off = Relative Colorimetric, Black Point Compensation On.
2. Simulate Black Ink On = Relative Colorimetric, Black Point Compensation Off
3. Paper Color On = Absolute Colorimetric
Please note the application color settings do not affect this conversion, just the first.
For the most accurate proof #3 is the best option. That is not saying that absolute colorimetric is ideal for file conversions. It is a rendering intent that is ideal for a proofing workflow, and the conversion to the print device (the 2nd conversion in the output you describe) is what is at the heart of the proofing workflow.

I have updated some softward on my IPhone 5 and now it is asking me to log into me network.   I am putting the correct password in, but it is not letting me access.   The screen is also very different, giving me the option to log in in different languages

I have updated some software on my IPhone 5 and now it is asking me to log into me network.   I am putting the correct password in, but it is not letting me access.   I now only have access to emergency calls.   The screen is also very different, giving me the option to log in in different languages.
Can someone please help.
thanks

Thank you for replying.    Yes I deleted the old email address..

Z3 D6603 very low call volume !! HELP !!

My Z3 D6603 have very low call volume !! Once going out side, i can hear tiny voice from my caller. This phone cant be use outside !! I try alot of suggestion from internet but not working. I try the setting on the "Call", I try the setting on "Audio Setting" still not doing a thing.

could you elaborate ?

Hi there, I have noticed that the color (how it handles brightness) of my own iMac is very different to that of other iMac's. My machine will also not let me create a calibrated version through the system preferences either, an error ocurrs.

Hi there, I have noticed that the color/ brightness of my iMac is very different to that of other iMac's. My machine will also not let me create a calibrated color version through the system preferences either, an error ocurrs. Any pointers on how this issue could be fixed? THanks.

Mac and Mac models are picky about the RAM the Mac needs to see and use.
As you have found out, the 1067 speed RAM will not work in your year and model iMac.
You need the 1333 speed RAM.
If, you can return the RAM for a refund, do it!
If not, try online Mac RAM source and seller Crucial memory. They have a table that matches your Mac to the correct and reliable RAM. You may need to contact them to see whether or not they ship to South Africa, though.
If Crucial dpesn't work out, here's the specs for your year and model iMac that you need to seek out and purchase.
Maximum Memory
32 GB (Actual) 16 GB (Apple)
Memory Slots
4 - 204-pin PC3-10600 (1333 MHz) DDR3 SO-DIMM
Good Luck!

FAS2240 - Datastore Usage very different to Volume Usage.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for