Fault message in BPM process

I have a bpm process with a sync send step. i have a default fault message strcuture and my sync interface ( a proxy) is using this as fault message format. In case of an fault in the proxy i get the fault message returned. In my bpm i have an exception handler installed for the exception. What i would like to do in my process is send the fault message to another step like a send step.
i m not looking to understand sync/async bridges or how to setup a bpm process. I am looking for help in how i can work with the fault message in my bpm process other then only let it trigger the exception routine

Hi Frank,
in the view of your BP an exception at proxy side is no reason to stop processing. The message will be put to your interface and it is your decision to put data into a container and to send it. For using a "global" container for every kind of message have a look to my weblog <a href="/people/udo.martens/blog/2006/04/28/bpm-container-for-any-message-type Container for any Message Type</a>. If your send step is not successful and you want to catch that: Define an exception branch for your block, where you send a senseful message to notice the error. You can refer in the original send step the exception, during runtime the process jumps into the exception branch and is doing that what you defined there.
Regards,
Udo

Similar Messages

  • Emulate Fault message in BPM

    Hello
    I have read all related topics
    fault message in BPM process
    Alert monitoring and fault message types
    Using Fault Message Type in BPM
    but no answer..
    I have synch BPM that send synch request to RFC and a mapping step. Then I have to catch exception (of send step or mapping) and send fault message in exception handler.
    I haven't a proxy. I want to create fault message manually and send it. Is it possible? I cannot create an interface of fault message type.

    Hi Sergey,
    As far as I know, it's possible to catch the mapping/send exception.
    It's also easy to define an exception branch for this exception, and inside the exception branch, send a "normal" message in a send step.
    However, as far as I know there's no way of specifying a BPM send step that sends a fault message.
    At least in my experience, regular messages are just as useful when sending error information.
    Cheers,
    Ofer

  • Handling SOAP Fault messages in BPM

    Hi,
    My scenario is Sync-Async Bridge involving File to SOAP transformation. I have used BPM as 1 file has many records and each record is required to call the web service synchronously.
    In the BPM I have
    Receive ---> Transform (1:n multimapping ) -
    > Block (Par for Each)
    In Block  I have Send Sync step to call Web service . I have an exception branch for the send step for catching Fault message that is sent back from webservice for Application Fault.
    Problem:
    Though the Fault message is sent from web service ,in the BPM  the block goes in error saying : "No exception defined for fault message ".  The Exception brach is not executed.
    Please suggest if anyone has come across such a scenario and solution to this.

    hi satesh
    using "exception handler" in BPM we can handle the error messages
    regards
    kummari

  • Handling fault messages in BPM

    Hi,
    I am using BPM for a RFC to SOAP scenario to handle Fault messages. (Please have a look at my previous post also SOAP Fault message )
    I have created an exception block in BPM to catch the fault message from SOAP service. Inside the exception block i need to map the fault message to RFC response. But fault message is not accessible in Exception block.
    Let me know if you have any idea to solve this.
    Thanks,
    Uma

    Uma:
    Let me make clear the requiremt. You have RFC Import(aka Request message) and Export(aka Response + Exception) and you have Web Service with Request, Response, Fault messages. And you want to send the fault messages back to the RFC in addition to the response. I was wondering, If we do the following mapping without BPM, does that fulfill your requirement.
    RFC-Import <----
    > SOAP Request
    RFC-Export <----
    > SOAP Response
    RFC-Export <----
    > SOAP Fault
    Can you let me know if you face any problems with this one. I have seen your other thread and was wondering, whats the problem is. May be I didn't understand the requirement properly. Please clarify me

  • Handling SOAP Fault Message in BPM

    Hello XI SDN'ers,
    I am getting SOAP Fault Message in my SOAP Scenario and I am not aware of Handling that error in my BPM. Could any one tell me, How to handle such error's in BPM?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Satish.

    hi satesh
    using "exception handler" in BPM we can handle the error messages
    regards
    kummari

  • Sequential processing of messages with bpm process

    hi,
    i have a bpm process that i want to process my messages sequential. for this i initially have played around with crerating my own queue but that didn t work. then i mocved to use the collect pattern and then process the messages. this works only for around 150 messages and the others are staying stuck in the queue for the bpm process the queue is in status stop. if a drop in another file then the queue get cleared and the new messages are placed in it and it still stays in stop and i need to delete queu and start again. Is there a solutio for this that the queue will collect the messages and when the bpm proces is finished it will start again ?
    i have tried to avoid using the collect pattern and worked with my bpm process to let it use a specific queue  but that also didn t work. i can process 1 message and then the rest stays in the queue? any help would be welcome

    Hey
    is there any reason specific reason for using BPM?
    you can use EOIO to transfer your files sequentially.
    thanx
    ahmad

  • Send async message between bpm processes takes long time

    Hi all,
    We use XI 3.0 SP16.
    We have 2 BPM Processes.
    One of these Processes sends an asynchronous message, which is directed
    to the other (by the receiver determination defined in the directory).
    In SXMB_MONI, we see that the "End Time" of the asynchronous send step
    is about 3 seconds after the "Start Time".
    Furthermore, when the first process sends this message to several other
    processes, this time is longer, and gets up to 10 seconds for the
    last "send" step in SXMB_MONI.
    What can be the cause for this?
    How can we minimize this time?
    Thanks ahead for any help,
    Yoav.

    Hi Sravya,
    Thanks for your answer.
    The main process is similar to the Multicast pattern.
    The other process(es) is an Async/Sync Bridge.
    We use A/S Bridge for every receiver so that we can first send all requests asynchronously,
    and only then handle responses as they arrive.
    (Otherwise, a request is sent only after the former response arrives).
    However, paradoxically, using A/S bridge makes the whole process take longer (for few receivers) due to the problem described.
    Yoav.

  • How to get detailed fault message in business process when exception?

    In bp, I use "catch all exception" to handle exception. When exception, I get fault message from all of component and write them into log files. But no matter which component throw exception, I cannot get any detailed message, the string writed into log is always null. Why? server.xml has all detailed message and printstack and why cannot I get?

    Hi,
    As far as I know, it's not possible to get the exception message with a catch all. You need to catch each exception separately, and the you will be able to get each message.
    Regards
    Gustavo

  • Error "Unknown Message" in BPM process

    Hi, I'm experiencing the wonderful "Unknown Message" error that has been very discussed here. I am creating an IDoc to JBDC business process who bundles several IDocs to be sent as a query to JDBC.
    When I try to run the process, it doesn't even starts it, because of this error.
    I checked the XML and I think that the issue is at the receiver determination or at the interface determination, because the tag receiver looks like this:
    - <SAP:Sender>
      <SAP:Service>System1</SAP:Service>
      <SAP:Interface namespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages">FIDCC2.FIDCCP02.ZFIDCCP02</SAP:Interface>
      </SAP:Sender>
    <SAP:Receiver>
      <SAP:Party agency="" scheme="" />
      <SAP:Service>IntegrationProcess1</SAP:Service>
      <SAP:Interface namespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages">FIDCC2.FIDCCP02.ZFIDCCP02</SAP:Interface>
      <SAP:Mapping notRequired="Y" />
      </SAP:Receiver>
    And, from what I said above, the IDoc can't be both sender and receiver. For me, it doesn't make sense. In the receiver it should have been the inbound abstract interface,right?
    What I tried and doesn't work:
    1) Reactivating the integration process from SXI_CACHE
    2) Reimporting the process to the integration directory
    3) Deleting and then remaking all the directory objects, like receiver det, interface det and receiver agreement.
    What Integration Directory objects I have
    1) communication channels
    2) business scenario
    3) imported integration process
    4) receiver determination from ERP to the integration process, including an interface determination from IDoc to abstract interface
    5) receiver determination from integration process, including an interface det from abstract interface to JDBC message interface
    6) receiver agreement from integration process to JDBC business system, having checked on header mapping the sender service as the integration process.
    Can you please help me in any way?
    Please don't post links that contain solutions that I already tried, I think I've seen today at least 20 links on this issue and none helped.
    If this is not sufficient, I can post the whole return XML on my next reply.
    Thanks in advance,
    George
    Edited by: George Ardeleanu on Jan 26, 2009 1:57 PM

    I've checked the trace and the main error message seems to be:
    <Trace level="1" type="T">...There is no Interface Determination configured for receiver party and receiver service IP_CreditControl_Bundle</Trace>
    How could this be? Because I've set the receiver & interface determination in the integration directory and they're fine.

  • Using Fault Message Type in BPM

    Hi,
    In my BPM Scenario, I am using a synchronous send step in which I am using a fault message type.For giving the container for the fault message in the Properties area of the send step, I want to define a container corresponding to the Fault message Type I have already defined.How can I achieve this since it is not possible by defining an Abstract Interface? Can someone please explain how to do this?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Soumya.

    Hi Soumya,
    Here are the links for two threads. one has discussed fault mssage type in bpm and the other the general application of a fault message type.
    thread1:- Alert monitoring and fault message types
    thread2:- fault message in BPM process
    Regards,
    Sushumna

  • Send Fault message from SAP XI

    I have scenario: get async file from FTP. Starting BPM. From BPM I send message to SOAP service(sync). Where I recieve Fault Message. In BPM I have exception handler.
    Could any body tell how send parced Fault message to FTP.
    As I understand we need mapping somthing like "Fault message type" to "Inbound message type"

    Hi Anton,
    Its not possible to catch the data of fault message in BPM with the standard design.Since you can't make an abstract interface of the fault message.
    The option available is to parse the XML in the fault message mapping and do a call using UDF's (RFC, SOAP, JDBC calls are supported).
    cheers
    Sunil.

  • Handling fault messages in an Integration Process (bpm)

    I have a bpm in PI 7.11 which performs a synch call to an external webservice. In addition to the request/response, that webservice can also generate two faults: ObjectNotFoundFault and generalfault.  I am having trouble handling these faults - when a fault occurs my handler is not being invoked and thus the bpm process stops/errors. When I look at the underlying process (via txn swi1), I see the exact error text:
    "No exception defined for fault message ObjectNotFoundFault http://www.companyb.com/services/olsa_v1_0/"
    From what I understand within the bpm synch call step to the webservice I need to do the following to handle the exception/fault:
    - put the synch call (to the webservice) into a block
    - add an exception branch to that block named let's say A & set the exception handler of that block to be A
    - in the exception setting of that synch step, select A
    In my case, I don't care about the fault details other than to ensure it does not stop the whole Integration Process, so in my exception branch I don't do anything. I did try adding a control step within it too (as per SAP Press text book).
    Is there anything else I need to do here?  I am not mapping the returned fault - does the fault need to be mapped (not sure how I would do this given that the synch step uses an abstract interface and therefore to my knowledge no fault mapping can be done)? 
    There are 2 Notes that describe my issue exactly:
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1484903
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1158699 <-- this one refers more to me, but we already have in 7.11
    Can anyone let me know exactly the steps I would perform to handle these faults - does the exception name / handler A above need to be named the actual exception / fault ObjectNotFoundFault?
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Keith)?
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Keith

    Thanks - my scenario I guess is #2 of that blog. But is your take that even if I don't care what is in the fault message, i.e. I don't care about the contents of it but rather I just want to continue on from it, that I still need to perform this java coding?  It's not clear to me from what he says - it seems to me he does the java coding to actually capture the contents of the message.  I am in fact using the soap axis adapter too, as he is. The screen shot showing the exception branch is basically what I have.
    Regards,
    Keith

  • Fault message in synchronous send step in BPM

    Hi,
    When executing a synchronous send step in BPM it is possible to handle application errors (fault messages) with an exception branch. But how do you get hold of the actual data in the Fault message(faultText, faultURL, faultDetail etc) for further processing (mapping)?
    Kind regards Johan

    Johan,
    u have to define another container element in integration process.
    For that container element an Async Abstract interface has to created with falult message as the message.
    Do u have the fault message defined already...
    Also go through this thread.
    Fault message handling in BPM
    -Naveen.

  • BPM + PROXY + Fault Message

    Hello
    My scenario is JDBC -> BPM <-> Proxy
    I developed a BPM has a step-type <SENDER> that is synchronous.
    Information on the above step:
      . The message interface used an output, an input message and also a Fault Message.
    . I'm calling a proxy in the ECC and runs an exception if an error occurs in the application (inside the proxy).
      . This exception is returned to the BPM and I run a <block> to handle the exception.
    My need is to capture the contents of the exception in the BPM and send this text to another application.
    How do I recover the contents of the exception returned by Proxy in BPM?
    Thank you,
      Aroldo

    Hi, it is not supported in the meaning that the payload of the fault message is not returned to the integration process, so that's right Baskar. The only thing possible is to trigger exceptions for fault messages, see [Sending Messages from Integration Processes Synchronously -> Procedure -> Specify Exceptions|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/43/6211331c895f6ce10000000a1553f6/content.htm].
    Possible solutions:
    If it is a custom proxy you could change the behavior so that no fault messages are triggered. Instead you return the error message in the payload structure of the response.
    If it isn't a custom proxy you could create a custom proxy wrapper with a separate structure for exceptions in the response. Call the implementation of your desired proxy in the wrapper implementation, handle the exception and return the exception contents in the separate structure of the response.
    Or you could try to create a data type enhancement for exception contents for the response message, create a proxy from the enhancement, and implement the OUTBOUND_PROCESSING method where you copy the exception messages to the structure of the data type enhancement.
    Regards, Martin

  • BPM in CACHE won't activate. Fault message is not defined

    Hello All,
    After adding fault messages to our RFC scenarios, our BPM will no longer activate from transaction SXI_CACHE. The ReturnCode is 99. When we attempt to do a manual activation, we get an error which reads:
    <b>Send step: Fault message '722783b5171311d9881bd5c4c0a8a777' is not defined</b>.
    Have any of you seen this before?
    We have mappings for the fault messages in interface mappings. Is there something else needed in the BPM itself?
    Thanks,
    Jimmy

    From OSS:
    The synchronous send steps define a fault message as exception. In this
    case you have to wrap a block around every one or all send steps.
    The block catches the exception, in your case the fault message.
    The problem is, if no handler is defined, the import of the process fails (SXI_CACHE).
    So modify the process, wrap a block with exception
    handling around the send step and activate once more.

Maybe you are looking for