FCE Slow Render comapred to Imovie 08

Hi,
I have noticed a 60min HD 1280x720 is taking 17 hours to render which I'm sure never took that long before.Imovie is much quicker so any ideas what might be going on?
I'm using a fairly new 2.8 imac with 4 gigs ram.
Cheers,
Simon

That definitely moves things along. So that we can be of help, what were the other settings you provided from? Is that how you were exporting, Using Quicktime Conversion?
Also, here's what I would like you to do:
Click on the sequence you are using in the browser, then go to +Sequence > Settings > Load Sequence Preset+ and tell us what it says there.
I realize I am asking a lot of questions but I can assure you they are all geared to help!
Message was edited by: skalicki`

Similar Messages

  • How can I make slow motion work in iMovie 10.0.2?

    Is there a way to make effects such as slow motion work in iMovie 10.0.2 (OSX 10.9.2)? In Modify drop down, Slow Motion is black, but the speed options are grayed out. Same with Fast Forward, Instant Replay, and Rewind. Anyone know why some capabilities were delted with the new versions of iMovie?

    Jim,
    The menu options (slo mo, fast wd, instant replay, rewind) are black; however, once I select one of these, all the speed options are gray and ineffective. Right click of a clip does not have a "show speed editor." And I am working in the timeline and not the event browser. Any other suggestions? Do we both have the same version (10.0.2)?
    Thanks

  • Issues DNxHD & CC2014. V Slow RENDER and Do I remove CC if 2014 now on system?

    My Prem Pro CC suddenly v slow to render and export and exporting OUT OF SYNC (H264 etc)
    Upgraded to CC2014 yesterday still v slow, constant rendering all timeline for small things like small Jpegs
    Old Premier Pro CC still showing on system? Even though upgraded to 2014 Thought 2014 was just upgrade not reinstall. Do I remove CC?
    I shot Avid Codec DNxHD 185x (ninja via C100), imported as DNxHD and also tested AVCHD - Been trying to export as h264 1920x1080 various configs tried...out of sync by few frames but think Video slow than audio but not across timeline. 
    1. DO I remove CC? - I though it was an upgrade not a reinstall
    2. How can I improve awful and sudden slow render. I have cleared cache in adobe and PC. System WIN 7 -  i7 3770 3,4ghz, 14Gb RAM, GeForce GTX 570 card. This must be software issue? Thanks
    3. How to export in synce, timeline is in sync. Have exported VID and AUDIO sepearte and re assembled - didnt work. Have deleted render files and exported - didnt work
    V frustrating/
    Any help out there??
    Thanks
    Lorne

    CC2014 is a completely separate version And just like in the past old versions are left in place As a fallback option. For your technical isssues with Premiere ask in their forum.
    MYlenium

  • Audio Problems with Fast/Slow/Reverse Effect in iMovie HD

    I have been having problems with the Fast/Slow/Reverse effect in iMovie HD with my movie clips. Whenever I apply the effect (reversing at the same playback speed, not sped up or slowed down), when it is finished rendering the audio is choppy, yet on time (but still backwards, as wanted). Before applying the effect, the preview of it works flawlessly, it is only when it is applied that the audio gets choppy. Extracting the audio will not help either because the video will still be playing backwards while the audio will be playing normally (since it can't be reversed on its own). I have tried other effects on the same clips that don't effect the audio and they work perfectly. Any suggestions? I'd really appreciate your help! Thanks.
    Macintosh Powerbook G4   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   iLife '05 : iMovie HD

    Have you got an isolated hard drive with ALL of the required applications and other resources together with the operating system ? Using an external HD to SAVE a running iMovie project is asking for problems. Back up the Project on another HD sure, but don't use System on one HD, running files on another.
    Hope Helps,
    Ernie Lee

  • Slow render times with latest update

    Since updating to Premiere CC 7.1 I am experiencing extremly slow render speed with Magic Bullet Looks and .Filmconvert pro 2. When hitting enter to render it hangs for aout 10 seconds before starting. Then after each shot has been rendered it hangs again before continuing, What used to take around 20 minutes now takes 2 hours 34 minutes.
    Adobe, please can you show me how to roll back to version 7.0.1 as i don't have time to mess about with this.
    OS: Windows 7
    GTX 570 with latest driver (331.65)

    Hi captain,
    Check out the plug-ins manufacturer's web page and see if there are any updates for your plug-ins.
    Thanks,
    Kevin

  • Audio not rendered - but when I tell FCE to render it, nothing happens

    When I pull in some DV files, FCE shows my audio as not rendered, with that red line. So I tell it to render it, and nothing happens. I get a very brief flash of the rendering progress bar, the red line disappears, but the audio remains unrendered because when you play it you get silence (I have turned off the annoying "beeping").
    Even if I save the project, or quit and restart, or tell FCE to render everything, my audio remains stubbornly unrendered.
    Any suggestions?

    Hey, I had the same thing happen to me. I'm not sure if this is the best answer, but in order to get it to render, i had to select the audio in the timeline and in the menu, i select Render Only --> Needs Render. That worked for me. Hopefully that will solve your problem too. Good luck!

  • Slow render speed:  Mac Pro vs. Mac Mini (FCP Vs. FCE)

    About a year ago I purchased a Mac mini (2gb ram, 2.0 dual core processor running OS 10.4) and using Final Cut Express. Understandable, rending and exporting took awhile.
    A week ago I upgraded to a Mac Pro (10gb ram, 2.8 8-core processors running OS 10.5) and Final Cut Pro Studio 6. I assumed that I would see a rather dramatic decrease in in the time it takes to render (and to export).
    However, the I am seeing virtually no difference whatsoever in rendering speed between the Mac mini running FCE and the Mac Pro running FCP. I'm very disappointed.
    What gives? I'm editing virtually the same material and it's just as slow as before.
    Any ideas anyone on what may be causing this?

    I am generally using SD video imported (log and transfer) directly from the hard drive of a Sony HDR-SR12 camera, although I also use captured video from a Panasonic HVX200 camera. My "Easy Setup" setting has been DV-NTSC for both Final Cut Express and now Final Cut Studio.
    The rendering that I'm talking about, for example, is when I put an effect on a video track that requires rendering before I can play it.
    I'm then typically exporting the finished video to a Quick Time movie DV-NTSC setting.
    Again, there is no improvement at all in the time it takes to render and export using the Mac PRO vs. the Mac mini using identical settings. I would think there should be a significant improvement.

  • Very slow render on my beast of a machine

    Hello, I have an issue whereby my rendering is very slow. I am using premier elements 12 with a windows 8.1 computer that has an 8-core amd 8350 processor, 8 gbs of ram, and I have an AMD 7970 6gb video card crossfired with an AMD 280x video card. Crossfire probably doesnt even work, but even with just the 280x, it should be faster than this.
    I capture game footage, which is captured in xvid format, which I then import into PE12. I don't add any effects, other than some color tweaking, and some brightness/contrast tweaking. Then I export it in the same specifications it was captured in (1080p 30fps). A 7 minute video takes about 20 minutes to render/export using MP4 codec. If I try to use other codecs, it takes even longer. On my Mac Pro, using other programs like iMovie, this sake video would take like 2 minutes, and it only has a 4-core processor at a much slower clock speed, and only has a 6870 amd video card, which is like 1/4 the power. I feel that either the 8-cores aren't being used, or something else is wrong. No rendering that doesn't involve complicated effects should take longer to render than the footage length is. If the video is 10 minutes long, it should take 1 minute to render if it doesn't have chroma keying or anything heavy like that. How do I fix this?

    Thanks for the tip. Bandicam already works when I choose "motion jpeg", and it works very nicely as far as being able to record in very high quality without disrupting my gaming performance. The issue is that it still takes longet to render a video than the length of the video itself. So a 6 minute clip, for example, will take about 15-20 minutes. This is unacceptable when ther are no major effects going on, such as chromakeying. I should be able to render atleast at speed play (ie, if a video is 2 minutes, it should take no more than 2 minutes), based on performance I get on my lesser Mac with a lesser CPU, lesser video card etc. It may be the rendering settings. I am using the stock "youtube widescreen HD" preset in PE12, and i manually change teh 720p to 1080p (like my footage). What else can I try?
    The only thing I can think of is that PE12 doesnt use 8 cpu cores, or it doesnt use OpenCL. Does it? I cannot find any settings in PE12 for "enable multicore processing" or "enable openCL" etc.

  • Slow render speed

    Hi
    As I am new to iMovie HD I have been experimenting with imported clips. I have overcome importing mpeg2 and have been testing adding effects etc and have found that the render time in the timeline for the effect to be 'ready' is slow.
    I am using a 2.1Hz iMac G5 (iSight) with 1gb of Ram. I have ensured that all other apps are not running but this does not noticebly increase the render speed.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

    "Slow" is quite a vague term...
    But be aware that appling effects to clips needs a lot of your machine power, as each frame has to be "redrawn". Longer the clips, longer the time needed.

  • Slow Render with High-End System?

    Im currently working on a (in my opinion) high-end Windows system for video editing. The system is about 2 years old and has cost a fortune in that time. So Im expecting significantly better speed. So heres my problem:
    Im working primarly in Premiere Pro and After Effects. All the media I work with are as a video imported Jpeg Sequences. Often I have multiple Sequences (up to 7 or 8) overlayed and tweaked with Dissolves and plugins like Twixtor. I also use the Adobe Dynamic Link from After Effects to Premiere and vice versa. All the footage is currently in 1080p but in future I will want to render 4K. Im aware that a 4K workflow is probably a pain in the *** so Im surely going to edit offline with 1080p. However  I cant get any real-time playback with all my sequences. I ALWAYS have to render a preview to watch my edits. I dont know if Im just having too high expectations for my system, but Im kinda sure there has to be an issue for this lack of performance. Maybe the Dynamic Link is slowing my system down?
    System Specs:
    Model : HP Z400 Workstation 103C_53335X
    Mainboard : HP 0B4Ch
    System BIOS : HP 786G3 v03.15 10/29/2010
    RAM : 12GB ECC DIMM DDR3
    Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           W3530  @ 2.80GHz (4C 3GHz/3GHz, 2.13GHz IMC, 4x 256kB L2, 8MB L3)
    Chipset:
         HP X58 I/O Hub 2x 2.4GHz (4.79GHz)
         HP Core Desktop (Bloomfield) UnCore 2x 2.4GHz (4.79GHz), 3x 4GB ECC DIMM DDR3 1GHz 192-bit
    Graphic card : NVIDIA Quadro 4000 (8CU 256SP SM5.0 950MHz, 512kB L2, 2GB 2.81GHz 256-bit, PCIe 2.00 x16)
    Harddisks:
          4x WDC WD2002FAEX-007BA0 (1TB, RAID10/SATA600, SCSI-4, 3.5", 7200rpm) : 932GB (C:)
         Intel Raid 1 Volume (4TB, RAID, SCSI-4) : 4TB (D:)
         HL-DT-ST BD-RE BH10LS30 (SATA150, BD-RE, DVD+-RW, CD-RW, 4MB Cache) : k.A. (E:)
    Thank you very much in advance for your help and I apologize for any grammatical mistakes since english is not my main language.

    Valentin,
    I have always called a raid10 a solution for the paranoid in a hurry. It takes 4 drives to give you the capacity and performance of two disks, but gives you security by the mirroring.
    Before going into your specific situation, allow me to tell something about volumes and drives, because they can be confusing and at the same time they are very important for optimal performance of a system.
    Single disk, not partitioned is 1 disk = 1 volume to the OS
    Single disk, partitioned is 1 disk = multiple volumes (not a good idea BTW)
    Multiple disks in one raid array is Many disks = 1 volume
    Multiple disks in one raid array with partitions is Many disks = multiple volumes (not a good idea either)
    Each volume has a distinct drive letter for access.
    Partitioning is a thing of the past and should not be used at all on modern systems.
    You have to think about volumes more than about number of disks. In my current system I have 27 different physical disks but only 4 volumes. In the old one I have 17 disks and 5 volumes.
    Now that we are clear what we are talking about, volumes with distinct drive letters, we can address your situation.
    You have TWO volumes, C: (single disk) and D: (4 disks in raid10). Spreading the load across two volumes is more demanding and gives slower performance than using more volume, unless one or more volumes are very fast, as I tried to explain in a previous reply (remember Isenfluh/Sulwald?). If you add a SSD as you intend, you have increased the number of volumes to 3, which will definitely help performance, because SSD's are faster than conventional disks, the pagefile can be stored on the SSD, so all your performance will go up.
    Compare your setup with mine with rough estimated figures:
    Volume
    Valentin
    Harm
    Transfer rate Valentin
    Tranfer rate Harm
    C:
    1 HDD
    1 SSD
    125 MB/s
    450 MB/s
    D:
    4x Raid10
    1 SSD
    250 MB/s
    450 MB/s
    E:
    NA
    21x Raid30
    NA
    2,700 MB/s
    F:
    NA
    1 HDD
    NA
    150 MB/s
    These figures are indicative, but do show where the major differences are. In my experience disk setup is overlooked quite often, but has a huge impact on a system's responsiveness. It is the weakest (slowest) link in the chain, afterall and with your workflow, doubly so.
    But in your specific case there is something else, and that is your disappointing hardware MPE score. 100 seconds is extremely slow, even for a Quadro 4000. I would be quite normal to see a score around 8 - 9 seconds on such a system, well maybe around 12 - 13 seconds with your ECC memory, but 100 is way too slow. Some background services or processes are interfering with the hand-over from memory-GPU-VRAM-GPU-memory. This can be caused by a myriad of things, but a good starting point would be the BlackViper list of services to set to manual or disabled and taking a closer look at the processes running with Process Explorer. There should normally be less than 50 processes running.
    Hope this helps.

  • Slow render times with large jpegs - complete system lag

    In a project i'm working on I have two large jpegs with a small zoom scaling effect. Going from 100 to 103 percent.
    I've noticed that both Adobe Media Encoder and Premiere Pro experience a heavy slow down in render time as soon as the jpegs have to be rendered.
    Not only does the render speed almost come to a halt, the complete system lags very heavy, even the mouse cursor won't respond well.
    This happens when i have GPU acceleration enabled and when i do a 2 pass H264 encoding.
    When I have the GPU acceleration disabled the render goes very smooth, and doesn't seem to slow down...
    The jpeg is 4023  x 2677, and 6,97 MB large.
    Scaling the jpeg down to about 1920x1080 in Photoshop and put that one in the timeline made the render go a lot faster.
    I understand that a large picture takes a bit more time to be rendered, but we're talking about a 10minute render whit the large jpeg file and  a 2 minute render with the jpeg resized.
    The total time of the two jpegs in the video is 5 seconds in a 3 minutes video.
    So, that made me think that the render times are exponentially long.
    In the timeline everything runs really smooth.
    Is this considered normal, I can't remember having such big differences in CS5. It's not a major thing, but I wanted to share anyway.
    My system:
    Premiere Pro CC (latest)
    i7 4930K
    32 GB RAM
    2xGTX480
    Footage and project on a Raid0 disk
    Previews/Cache on a Raid0 disk
    System and Premiere on SSD
    Render to a single 7200 rpm drive.

    >wanted to share
    Yes... known issue... I think some of the below is about P-Elements, but the same ideas
    Photo Scaling for Video http://forums.adobe.com/thread/450798
    -HiRes Pictures to DVD http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1187937?tstart=0
    -PPro Crash http://forums.adobe.com/thread/879967

  • After effects CC on maverick slow render because of PP CC Dynamic Link Footage

    I put premiere pro CC edits in After Effects CC through dynamic Link every day. Since I upgraded my systems to Maverick and first installed the 12.0.1 and afterwards 12.1 the rendering of the After effects projects that have Dynamic Link Edits on the timeline slow down from 10 hours (in12.0 on Mountain Lion) to about 90 hours. When I replace the dynamic Link with a QT Movie, it renders about 10 hours again. It is normal that Dynamic link slows dow the rendering, but this is extreme and since this wasn't the case on Mountain Lion and 12.0 for the same project with the same dynamic link, not normal. I couldn't figure out what causes this. Is this Maverick on my 2008 Mac Pro ? is this a bug in 12.1 or dynamic link ? Or can I solve this with a simple setting somewhere in Maverick or AE ?

    I'm was having the same issues, turned off "app nap" for premiere and after effects which has mostly fixed things.
    The only thing now though is if I have a dynamic linked after effects composition within premiere and I have the after effects project open (that the composition came from) the dynamic linked comp within premiere won't play properly no matter what.
    Tried everything I can find on the net - app nap, full screen full res rendering within after effects - that composition just won't play and take ages to render if the after effects project that it came from is open.
    If I close the after effects project, the dynamically linked composition in premiere starts playing perfectly. Open the project in after effects and that dynamically linked comps stop playing. Any other dynamically linked comps from other AE sessions play fine within premiere (unless I open their original AE project!)
    This used to work fine before - it was great to be able to have AE and premiere open together and make changes in AE then switch to premiere to see the changes update, watch the sequence to get context, then flick back to AE, make more changes etc.
    Now I have to close the AE project, go to premiere, watch the sequence, open the AE project, make changes. When doing a few hundred adjustments over a week this can add considerable time to workflow!
    Any ideas? Is this happening for you guys?

  • Multiple video tracks and slow render

    I have two video tracks. Everytime that I move the video on either track it has to re-render all the affected areas of the movie, but all I need it to do is switch to the highest video track. I don't need it to render at all. I'm sure I never had this problem before. Was this introduced by a newer version of Final Cut or have I introduced a new setting? This version is much slower on my C2D than it ever was on my iMac G3.

    Check item properties for your clips and see if they match item properties for the sequence. They should be exactly the same.

  • Why does FCE HD render audio every time I click on something?

    G5 dual processor   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

    Probably you should provide a bit more of info...
    The first question that comes to my mind is: is the video captured directly by FCE or imported from other programs (for example iMovie) ?
    or
    Are you really talking about rendering audio, or waveform building ?
    Hard to answer to a subject line...
    Piero

  • Extremely Slow Render Speed - GoPro and Twixtor

    Hello!
    I am new to the forums, and slightly new to AE, please don't yell at me if there's a similar thread around, I had a look, but nothing really suited my exact case.
    I've shot footage on my GoPro Hero 3+ Black, at 720p, 100fps.
    I've applied Twixtor to the individual parts required, the rest is at standard speed.
    I come across two main problems, one: The live preview is in really terrible quality, and is practically unusable due to its choppiness and blurriness.
    Two, being the render time. I tried a two minute video with about 10 seconds worth of slow mo with Twixtor. This took 9 hours to render to AVI. I tried again with WMV, same deal.
    I tried an even shorter clip (just straight 5 seconds of slowmo), this was a shorter render time, but still far too long to be practical.
    I'm using AE CS6, running Win 8.1, 2.4gHZ i5, 8GB DDR3, and a 2GB GForce Graphics card.
    I've tried tweaking the preferences for multiple core utilization etc etc, still no bonus.
    Is there something I'm doing wrong, or is it always meant to be this slow?
    Cheers,
    Dan

    Depending on the settings Twixtor can be extremely slow. If you have a lot of rolling shutter artifacts or motion blur in your original video you can also get terrible artifacts. Here's an important thing. MP rendering most likely will not work with Twixtor or any temporal effects so turn it off. The only way to know if your machine is behaving normally is to look at the shot and do some testing. Some shots just require a lot of tweaking to significantly slow down.
    If you shot at 100 fps and you want to playback in slow motion then the easiest way, and the best way to start is to go to Footage Interpretation and set the frame rate of your footage to 29.97 or 24 or what ever your deliverable product will be, then drop the footage in a new comp with the same frame rate. No Twixtor required.
    Now if you want to slow things down more or speed them up you are working from a much better place and the whole process will be much easier and faster to render. Twitter will also work better.

Maybe you are looking for

  • 3.1EA2 Old bug with German language settings still exists

    In the past I wrote several times about a bug in SQL Developer when running in German language mode. This bug is still not fixed in 3.1 EA2: In new folders for user definded reports only the options "Kopieren" and "Speichern unter ..." ('Copy' and 'C

  • Change description of Product Type Dropdown in SRM 7.0

    Hello, We are upgrading to SRM 7.0 and have a requirement where we need to rename the decription of Product type (dropdown) "Materials" to "Goods" on the "Describe Requirement " screen. We tried modifying the value table COMC_PR_TYPE_T which stores t

  • AlChemy stops working when Xonar is installed in the same system as X-Fi?

    A while back I tried to use an X-Fi Prelude and Xonar D2 in the same system. For the most part this worked, however AlChemy would no longer allow hardware sound in various games on the X-Fi. The results were the same whether DS3D-GX was turned on or

  • Using latest PS CC 2014 how to take a png and fade it

    Latest PS CC 2104, I have a lower third name title text png file that is about 2/3rds across the bottom screen - I need to fade out the last 1/3 of it...how?

  • Text Wrapping in Pages for iPad

    I have an iPad 2 and have started using Pages.  I already have several lines of text and have inserted a normal rectangular image.  I can't get the text to wrap around the image the way I would like.  Currently, I can only get the text to go above an