FF resolution settings to lower bandwidth usage

Which versions of FF will do this and what specific settings are there to lower bandwidth usage?
Also, will the FF settings override settings on websites such as youtube? For example, if my kids were to click on higher resolution or HD video settings for their youtube videos, what would happen?

Changing the resolution doesn't have any effect on the Firefox performance and may even look worse if you operate an LDC monitor not in its native resolution.
You can block content if you ant to improve performance on a low bandwidth connection.
You can look at Adblock Plus.
* Adblock Plus: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/adblock-plus/
You need to subscribe to a Filter list (e.g. the EasyList).
* http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions
* http://adblockplus.org/en/getting_started

Similar Messages

  • HT5731 How do I change my iTunes settings to lower the resolution of movies I download to reduce the download time?

    How do I change my iTunes settings to lower the resolution of movies I download to reduce the download time?

    If you're buying HD movies, you can change the setting in the Store preferences in iTunes to prefer 720p. Or you can just buy SD versions.
    Regards.

  • Screen Resolution settings on T61P

    Hi,
    Has anyone adjusted the screen resolutions settings on their T61P from 1680X1050 to 1440X900, or even lower? If so, does everything still look crip and clear at 1440X900?
    I have the need, as do others at work to be able to drop the resolution a bit for various reasons.
    Thanks in advance.
    Dave T. - Systems Architect

    Thank you for your tips..I run XP and it is not very clear if I lower the resolution to get a larger font   I also do not have very good eyesight so this is a pain....on my old Dell laptop I could use the CTRL + scroll the mouse to enlarge the screen....on my T61 (no mouse) I do not know how to do the same thing...any other tips?
    Thank you again...I am so Thinkpad illiterate!
    Could use a Thinkpad for Dummies handbook!
    T61 XP

  • What is the actual bandwidth usage?

    When I use Adobe Connect I am online and broadcasting for about 4 hours a day, for 10 days at a time. I only do screen sharing and voice -- no video.
    I have DSL Internet. The DSL upload speeds are very poor (under 1Mb). To speed things up, I thought I'd look into getting a 4G hotspot, but I'm worried about actual bandwidth usage, since such plans have a practical limit of 5 or 10Gb per month.
    My off-hand guess is that If I were to watch a video of myself, I guess it would be a couple of gigs for a four hour, non-HD video. So by that very rough guestimate, I'd hit 20Gb pretty easily over the 40 hours of my meeting. Is that right the way to think about it?
    Has anyone monitored actual consumed bandwidth for a simple meeting of one person talking and sharing his screen? I'm not looking for definitive answers -- just some ballpark estimate of what such a meeting consumes each hour...
    Thanks! :-)

    Page 22 of this document will give you some numbers that will allow you to estimate the total data used for a meeting. Keep in mind these numbers are what Adobe saw as average consumption, yours may be higher or lower.
    http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/adobeconnect/pdfs/web-conferencing/Adob e-Connect-9-Technical-Guide.pdf

  • Live A/V Broadcast How to support both High & Low bandwidth users ?

    Hello there
    I have been working on a requirement where I need to
    broadcast live audio and video feeds
    to Flash Media Server from where it gets broadcasted to our
    customers. We have two types of
    customers: High bandwidth and Low bandwidth.
    Now could anyone please tell me what kind of scripting is
    required at the server end so that
    the Media server broadcasts to these two level of user groups
    at same time. How do we control
    the live feeds received at the Media server ? How do I
    control the amount of bandwidth that at server
    side based on the received feed so that I can broadcast to my
    users based on their capacity ?
    I tried running two separate flash application pulling the
    feeds from SAME camera but that didn't
    work as changing the settings (like Camera.setMode..) on one
    program affects the settings on other
    program(as both programs are connected to same camera/mic). I
    do not want to buy two separate
    cameras/mic to support both high/low bandwidth users. I would
    need to do it programatically.
    Could anyone please let me know your thoughts, it would be
    very helpful to me and others.
    Many thanks,
    -Sakthik

    Thanks Charles for your reply. I didn't know that FMS doesn't
    support this feature. So you mean to say that there aren't any
    other ways to control live feeds at server side ?
    I would try your suggestion on setting the bandwidth and FPS
    at client side but I am not sure how effective will it be because
    the Server is going to push a high bandwidh data to a 56 Kbps
    pipeline. There will be lot of data loss due to this narrow
    pipeline. Do you think that applying setBandwidth and setFPS on
    this narrowed data is going to be effective ? I dont think so, what
    do you say ?
    How exactly does this setBandwidth and setFPS works ? When
    will it modify the data ? Will it modify the data after or before
    receiving it at the client end ?
    Please share your thoughts on this.
    Many thanks,
    -Sakthik

  • Low bandwidth anomalies at a university: 100BASE-TX and 1000BASE-T

    +Please note that this question was originally posted in another thread. In the hope of resolving this issue as quickly as possible, I’ve reposted this question in this thread- to cast the largest net, so to speak.+
    Over the past several weeks, colleagues and I have been attempting to resolve low bandwidth and throughput problems experienced by users at our university. The entirety of these instances are located in one building on campus. Working with one faculty member extensively, we initially saw problems including low download speeds, and in certain instances, exceedingly high upload speeds. At a first approximation, I concluded that this was the result of a duplex mismatch. Upon further investigation, and the inclusion of university IT personnel, we were informed that the problem was supposedly not related to a duplex mismatch, but rather a platform specific anomaly, specifically related to Macs and their supposed inability (or at the very least limited ability) to employ auto-negotiation protocols with any degree of success.
    My colleagues and I dismissed this almost entirely as ignorance or prejudicial. Was this an error?
    In order to test that hypothesis, we connected a PC to one of the drops in question; no substantial change in bandwidth was detected.
    However, during one meeting, it was communicated to us that by switching from the extant 100BASE-TX connections to a Gigabit Ethernet (1000BASE-T) connection that any low bandwidth issues would be resolved. Having made the transition for two machines, we have been unable to verify that the expected improvement was made respective to the new standard. Under the 100BASE-TX connections, we observed a range of download rates as low as 10-20kb/s and as fast as 4-10 Mb/s. After the switch to Gigabit Ethernet, the maximum download rate we’ve seen has been 80Mb/s; the average rate is substantially lower, usually floating in a range of 10-18 Mb/s. In any event, these represent a staggeringly low fraction of the expected available bandwidth.
    I’ve adjusted TCP buffer sizes (albeit with the Apple Broadband Tuner, not via the terminal), adjusted frame sizes (up to jumbo frames) and confirmed numerous times that the auto-negotiation protocols are indeed working client-side. On all the affected machines the speed (1000BASE-T) is set automatically, as are the duplex mode and MTU. Adjusting these settings manually seemingly has no effect.
    The affected machines include two Mac Pro workstations (quad core 3GHz and a eight-core 2.8 GHz), a MacBook Pro (2.5 GHz, 15 inch) a dual processor G5 tower (liquid cooled 2.5 GHz model), a Dell PC (for testing purposes only- see above), and a 500 MHz G4. The problem persists in various drops in the building, seemingly randomly.
    My suspicion is that the problem exists on the server-end; either a switch or router is configured incorrectly or perhaps a cabling problem exists? Unfortunately, the university’s IT personnel are not providing any answers. I’m wondering if I’ve overlooked something (basic or otherwise) that might be contributing to these problems?
    Thanks in advance!
    Message was edited by: DRS 1

    DRS 1 wrote:
    My colleagues and I dismissed this almost entirely as ignorance or prejudicial. Was this an error?
    No.
    In order to test that hypothesis, we connected a PC to one of the drops in question; no substantial change in bandwidth was detected.
    What do you mean by "no change"? Does the PC run fast or slow like the Macs? If the PC runs slow, then you should be able to use that fact to get the network fixed.
    My suspicion is that the problem exists on the server-end; either a switch or router is configured incorrectly or perhaps a cabling problem exists? Unfortunately, the university’s IT personnel are not providing any answers. I’m wondering if I’ve overlooked something (basic or otherwise) that might be contributing to these problems?
    First, you need to clarify a couple of things. Does a PC work correctly in this building? Does a Mac from the building work correctly in another building. You can try going to some random office store and buying the absolute cheapest 100BT hub and plugging that into the network and plug the Macs into the new hub. How is the speed?
    The problem is almost certainly wiring problems or a flaky router or hub. Unfortunately, no IT department in the world will even give you the time of day if "Macs" are involved. You have to prove that there is a problem that does not involve the Macs. For that, you'll need a PC or a hub. This is the one job that Mac can't do.

  • What Is The Network Bandwidth Usage Report?

    I'm looking at the "Network Bandwidth Usage" report and it's just a list of devices with no bandwidth numbers?  Is it ordered by amount of usage and if so, why isn't the usage displayed in the report and how do I see the usage for a device?  
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

    Page 22 of this document will give you some numbers that will allow you to estimate the total data used for a meeting. Keep in mind these numbers are what Adobe saw as average consumption, yours may be higher or lower.
    http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/adobeconnect/pdfs/web-conferencing/Adob e-Connect-9-Technical-Guide.pdf

  • Determining actual DSL bandwidth usage

    Hello All,
               I am seriously considering going to truly wireless (MiFi) internet after years of using DSL service.  However, there's one thing I have no data on:  my actual bandwidth usage month by month.
               Obviously I know I can't go back to day one and get this data, but I find it impossible to believe that it cannot be obtained relatively easily.  There is an old thread from 2010 where someone implied that one could query the DSL modem or modem/router could be queried to get this data.  I was not able to post a reply on that thread, and I presume that's because it's closed to new messages.
                Right now I have the latest D-Link router from Verizon and am able to log in to it without problems.  But this particular router has more possible options on more web pages (or their equivalent) than I've ever seen before.  Although I am a "tech geek" I have no idea where to look among the myriad options to seek out this data.
                If anyone has an answer as to how to query this router, or knows of a web resource that tells you how to do this "generically," I'm sure I can do so after a little noodling around.
                Thanks in advance for your assistance.
    Brian

    I'm not the most familiar with the D-Link routers Verizon hands out, but what you're looking to find is some information on the WAN or "Internet" end of the modem for how many bytes of traffic you have sent and received. This information may be for when the router was last rebooted or it may be from the last time your connection re-connedcted if it has dropped, so it isn't really accurate when it comes down to a breakdown of things. If you can get a byte count, it is easy to convert to Megabytes or Gigabytes from that point (Factorsof 10 in a general sense). By definition a Kilobyte is 1024 Bytes, but in some cases a factor of 10 is applied so a Kilobyte is 1000 Bytes. A Gigabyte can be 1024 or 1000 Kilobytes depending on how the data is being measured like previously mentioned.
    So, 40,960 Bytes / 1024 = 40 Kilobytes / 1024 = 0.039 Gigabytes.
    Considering how large (or small) the data plans tend to be on a Mi-Fi device, consider the type of network traffic you currently have and gauge it against future use. If you currently have gamers in the house, a Mi-Fi should already be off the table as a full blown replacement as cellular connections are poor quality connections for playing video games on. Not to mention, games and patches can consume the cap quickly if the gamer has a lot of games that they play. Also, if your home is Netflix or YouTube heavy, without turning down the video quality you'll find it's quite easy to run over a cap. On a Mi-Fi myself, I have to restrict my YouTube access since I am picky about low quality video, and force everything to HD. I can slip in a few videos on a Grandfathered 3GB plan with Verizon but if I watch some of the common, 20 minute videos I watch, that's a Gigabyte per video on average. My normal net usage would burn me through the cap in less than an hour.
    Just some food for thought, but keep in mind Verizon will most likely be unable to provide any sort of data usage counter. You may need to use third party routers or software in order to determine your usage per month.
    ========
    The first to bring me 1Gbps Fiber for $30/m wins!

  • Skype Bandwidth Usage

    Hello, 
    I would like to know how much bandwidth a Skype to Skype call uses per hour. If possible, I'd like the figures for just a voice call, as well as voice call with screensharing. I do not want the recommended upload/download speeds, but what the calls ACTUALLY use.
    I have searched around, and it's confusing because it seems people are mixing up Mb/MB and kbs/kBs. So if anyone can tell me the actual figures with the correct unit of measurememnt, I'd greatly appreciate it.
    My boyfriend and I talk via Skype. He does not have an unlimited internet plan, and he said that his plan just changed where he has faster speeds but lower alotted usage. He said that we used 16GB within a 3 day period ( this included some screensharing while he was playing games). I calculated the actual call time we had during those 3 days, and it was roughly 50hrs - this is for a 3 day period. Our calls ranged from 2hrs a session to 8hrs. We didn't always screenshare, but most times we'd both be playing a game while on a call.
    I'm no expert, but 16GB seems a bit exaggerated. If ayone can clear this up for me I'd really appreciate it.
    Thank You.

    Thank you for your reply.
    I do know how to check WHILE on a call, but I'm sure there is an "average" usage for a voice call, video call, etc?  I have seen posts listing the average usage depending on the type of call, but as I said, people were mixing up the units of measuements, and my ability to convert between the units of measurements is nonexistent >.>

  • Optimize network bandwidth usage in large multi-size corporate environments

    SymptomsTo maintain a high protection level, you may notice an increase in bandwidth due to the increased number of updates released per day. Policy Manager Proxy (PMP) installations are especially affected as the additional strain on the likely slower network connection that exists between the remote site hosting the PMP installation(s) and the main corporate site with Policy Manager Server (PMS). The network bandwidth usage can be especially high when computers are turn on on Monday as the update packages accumulate over the weekend.
    DiagnosisBy default, the Automatic Update Server (AUS) in PMS calculates byte-level differences for the last five update packages (per update channel). In the event where computers were turned off over the weekend, client machine has missed five updates, and PMS will then download a full update package (Aquarius Windows updates can be approximately 140MB in size). When this happens, network bandwidth usage can be excessively high.
    SolutionWe recommend applying the suggested changes on all PMS and PMP systems and all of the F-Secure clients behind PMP installations. This may reduce the update size from 140MB to 10MB. The suggested solution consists of three different changes, outlined below:
    1. Increase the number of byte-level difference files stored by the PMS
    For Windows
    To increase the number of byte-level differentials maintained by Automatic Update Server:
    Open [F-Secure Installation Path]\FSAUS.PM\conf\server.cfg in Notepad.
    Find the key num_old_versions_to_compare, change the value to 50, and save the file.
    Restart Automatic Update Agent (AUA) and Automatic Update Server (AUS). In command prompt: net stop fsaua, net start fsaua, net stop fsms, net start fsms.
    For Linux
    To increase the number of byte-level differentials maintained by Automatic Update Server:
    Open /etc/opt/f-secure/fsaus/conf/server.cfg.
    Find the key num_old_versions_to_compare, change the value to 50, and save the file.
    Restart Automatic Update Agent (AUA) and Automatic Update Server (AUS) daemons (root privileges required): #/etc/init.d/fspms restart
    The overall disk space requirement for PMS increases. We estimate the disk consumption to increase by 10GB. Make sure the hard disk hosting the Policy Manager Server installation (Program files\F-Secure\Management Server 5\) has enough disk space.
    2. Increase the cache size available on the PMP for storing files
    For Windows
    Note: Use the Advanced mode in Policy Manager Console (View >> Advanced mode) to edit the setting.
    Go to F-Secure Policy Manager Proxy > Settings > Communication > Cache size.
    The default setting is 500. Increase this to 5000 (5GB) and distribute new policies.
    Verify the setting on all Policy Manager Proxy systems and adjust the settings, if needed. The setting specifies how much disk space is set aside for storing databases on the Policy Manager Proxy.
    For Linux
    As Policy Manager Proxy on Linux is not centrally managed, the change involves modifying a configuration file that exists on the Policy Manager Proxy system locally.
    Open /etc/opt/f-secure/fspmp/conf/proxy.cfg.
    Find the key max_cache_size, and change the value to 5000: max_cache_size=5000.
    Restart the fspmp daemon (root privileges required): #/etc/init.d/fspmp restart
    3. Adjust the F-Secure Anti-Virus client configuration using Policy Manager Console (PMC) to help prevent clients from immediately falling back to downloading updates directly from the PMS.
    In case the client is unable to connect to the Policy Manager Proxy, for example due to high network traffic and multiple downloads taking place, the following setting dictates how soon the client attempts to connect directly to the Policy Manager Server to download updates.
    In Policy Manager Console, go to F-secure Automatic Update Agent > Settings > Communications > Policy Manager Proxies > PMP Proxy fallback time.
    Default value is zero which means fallback to PMS takes place immediately, in case where Policy Manager Proxy installation cannot be reached. To prevent this from happening, configure this setting to a higher value (suggest 7 hours).
    These steps should ensure database updates are only downloaded via the PMP.

    SymptomsTo maintain a high protection level, you may notice an increase in bandwidth due to the increased number of updates released per day. Policy Manager Proxy (PMP) installations are especially affected as the additional strain on the likely slower network connection that exists between the remote site hosting the PMP installation(s) and the main corporate site with Policy Manager Server (PMS). The network bandwidth usage can be especially high when computers are turn on on Monday as the update packages accumulate over the weekend.
    DiagnosisBy default, the Automatic Update Server (AUS) in PMS calculates byte-level differences for the last five update packages (per update channel). In the event where computers were turned off over the weekend, client machine has missed five updates, and PMS will then download a full update package (Aquarius Windows updates can be approximately 140MB in size). When this happens, network bandwidth usage can be excessively high.
    SolutionWe recommend applying the suggested changes on all PMS and PMP systems and all of the F-Secure clients behind PMP installations. This may reduce the update size from 140MB to 10MB. The suggested solution consists of three different changes, outlined below:
    1. Increase the number of byte-level difference files stored by the PMS
    For Windows
    To increase the number of byte-level differentials maintained by Automatic Update Server:
    Open [F-Secure Installation Path]\FSAUS.PM\conf\server.cfg in Notepad.
    Find the key num_old_versions_to_compare, change the value to 50, and save the file.
    Restart Automatic Update Agent (AUA) and Automatic Update Server (AUS). In command prompt: net stop fsaua, net start fsaua, net stop fsms, net start fsms.
    For Linux
    To increase the number of byte-level differentials maintained by Automatic Update Server:
    Open /etc/opt/f-secure/fsaus/conf/server.cfg.
    Find the key num_old_versions_to_compare, change the value to 50, and save the file.
    Restart Automatic Update Agent (AUA) and Automatic Update Server (AUS) daemons (root privileges required): #/etc/init.d/fspms restart
    The overall disk space requirement for PMS increases. We estimate the disk consumption to increase by 10GB. Make sure the hard disk hosting the Policy Manager Server installation (Program files\F-Secure\Management Server 5\) has enough disk space.
    2. Increase the cache size available on the PMP for storing files
    For Windows
    Note: Use the Advanced mode in Policy Manager Console (View >> Advanced mode) to edit the setting.
    Go to F-Secure Policy Manager Proxy > Settings > Communication > Cache size.
    The default setting is 500. Increase this to 5000 (5GB) and distribute new policies.
    Verify the setting on all Policy Manager Proxy systems and adjust the settings, if needed. The setting specifies how much disk space is set aside for storing databases on the Policy Manager Proxy.
    For Linux
    As Policy Manager Proxy on Linux is not centrally managed, the change involves modifying a configuration file that exists on the Policy Manager Proxy system locally.
    Open /etc/opt/f-secure/fspmp/conf/proxy.cfg.
    Find the key max_cache_size, and change the value to 5000: max_cache_size=5000.
    Restart the fspmp daemon (root privileges required): #/etc/init.d/fspmp restart
    3. Adjust the F-Secure Anti-Virus client configuration using Policy Manager Console (PMC) to help prevent clients from immediately falling back to downloading updates directly from the PMS.
    In case the client is unable to connect to the Policy Manager Proxy, for example due to high network traffic and multiple downloads taking place, the following setting dictates how soon the client attempts to connect directly to the Policy Manager Server to download updates.
    In Policy Manager Console, go to F-secure Automatic Update Agent > Settings > Communications > Policy Manager Proxies > PMP Proxy fallback time.
    Default value is zero which means fallback to PMS takes place immediately, in case where Policy Manager Proxy installation cannot be reached. To prevent this from happening, configure this setting to a higher value (suggest 7 hours).
    These steps should ensure database updates are only downloaded via the PMP.

  • How can i calculate the bandwidth usage of my Azure subscription?

    Hi,
    I know currently there is no API which provide bandwidth usage details. Is there any other way to find out my subscription's bandwidth usage?
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    Please have a look at below thread.
    #http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4590682/how-to-measure-windows-azure-bandwidth-usage-programmatically
    Here is a snippet.
    The Azure SDK doesn't provide any billing or consumption information programatically. As lgorek stated, you can approximate usage with IIS And WCF performance counters.And you'll also be able to use your own logging to track traffic from different users. 
    However, you won't be able to track bandwidth consumed when users download content from blob storage. Well, you could, but only if all of your blobs were private and you streamed their content through your web application instead of direct links on your web
    pages .
    Best Regards,
    Jambor
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • I just set up a new computer running Windows 8.1. When I go to my icloud photostream, the pictures are in PNG format NOT JPG. When I open and upload photos from the photostream, the resolution is so low that the image quality is terrible. Help?!?

    I just set up a new computer running Windows 8.1. When I go to my icloud photostream, the pictures are in PNG format NOT JPG. When I open and upload photos from the photostream, the resolution is so low that the image quality is terrible. Help?!?

    Hey Sierra, You can do just what you have stated. My question, what is your "other"? If it is over 1.5 GB you most likely have corrupt files. Doing a Restore to New, Factory restore should correct it. Just make sure you make a full backup of all information on your iPod to your computer before you restore, so you don't lose your stuff, contacts, videos, pictures, non-iTunes music, etc, use the cable and connect with your computer. Then, via cable, connect to your computer, run the Restore to new, don't use your backup. Treat this iPod as if it was your first one ever. When restore is done, set up and add what info you wish to install on this iPod. The music apps etc you purchased should be on your computer, if not you should be able to retrieve purchased apps and music from iTunes. Any music, videos, apps not purchased from iTunes will be lost to you if you do not save them to your computer or the cloud first. When your done, make a current Backup and you should good to go. Hope this helps. Good luck. Cheers.

  • My AT&T Yahoo email gives me an error message saying that my screen resolution is too low, but it is at 1600 x 900. This only happens in Firefox, not in IE.

    When I try to use Firefox to access my ATT.NET account I get an error message about my screen resolution being to low to support the site.My resolution is not low its at the highest available. I also use IE9 and do not have this problem. I am running Windows 7 and Firefox 15.0.1. This has been an ongoing problem. I am using a Toshiba laptop 15.6 screen with 4GB RAM. I see other complaints about this specific problem but have yet to find a solution. Thanks for your help.

    Please see added comments on the question. Its not a zoom issue its all about the new ATT design email and Firefox, I agree with Noah there a bug between the old and the new and firefox only.
    UPDATE:
    I stand corrected. I went back in again and did the reset zoom and it appears to eliminate the error. Problem solved but I am not sure why I never set up zoom and didn't have the problem on any other site. Will it need to be done each and every time I go into that page or is it now corrected?

  • Display resolution settings not storing since upgrading monitors

    We have (2) Mac Pros and since upgrading to larger monitors we have been having issues with the resolution settings not "storing" in display preferences. The computer setups are slightly different, and the monitor sizes and make/models are both different, but the problems are the same:
    1) Mac Pro DVI out > VGA switcher > Monitor VGA input
    2) Mac Pro DVI out > VGA switcher > DVI switcher > Monitor DVI input
    (*Note - I know this whole setup seems ridiculous, but it's the way each of the rooms were hard-wired)
    With both machines the problems intermittently vary from the resolution itself changing at random when turning on the machine each day, to the desktop background being about 2/3 the size of the screen, while all of the icons and rest of the desktop being normal sized/extended to the edges of the monitor as it should.
    It seems that if we change resolution to anything else, and then change back to the desired resolution, that usually solves the problem.
    Does anyone know why these settings won't save?
    (*Note - we recently upgraded to Lion, but the issue was there before and after the upgrade.)

    You must close the window and save changes to keep them.
    You may have a problem with Disk Permissions -- the file may not be available to you for writing.

  • I need  a symbol to remain center screen on my web page no matter the screen resolution settings.

    Im trying to create an animation with functions inside a symbol. I need the symbol settings to remain seprate from the other settings of other items on the page such as "stage" and "background image" which are set to %  height.width,longitude,latitude . It is important that the symbol stays in the center of the screen. I also need this symbol to always remain in the center of the screen no matter screen resolution settings  that are likly range from 1360x768 to 1920x1080.

    Hi there,
    I solved the problem. but by solving the problem with centering the symbol on the stage I created another one, a very strange problem.
    Firstly the solving of centering problem:
    I left all settings of the symbol by px, (means no responsive layout), set 0 px o for position, and wrote a css which then centered the symbol on the stage,
    sym.$("products").css({
       margin : 'auto',
       position: 'relative'
    here how does it look in edge:
    The symbol products is behaving just as supposed. The problem I created and which I don#t understand at all: I created another symbol (news) made the very same adjustments, but the symbol is not positioned as supposed. (of course I change the name of symbol in css). What the heck???
    Anyone any idea why this is happening?
    Here the link:
    http://www.stanko-b.com/heelbopps
    Stanko

Maybe you are looking for