FI document on actual distribution between segments

Dear Experts
I want to do actual distribution from segment to segment.
I thought I could do it on FAGLGA35.
However, nevertheless I did activation the real-time integration,
FI document was not generated.
FI document is not generated on actual distribution between segments?
Kaneko

Hi
If you are talking about real time integration between FI and CO, please check when you define the variant, cross segment field is checked. Also,please check document type and Ledger group is defined.This variant must be assigned to company code in customizing.
Rgds
Harsh

Similar Messages

Inconsistency between a document field and the prof. segment number

Hi,
While processing an invoice in one company code for vendor# XXX with the PO# AAAA line# 10, it is showing below error message while posting. Please advise on the below error or fix the issue to post the invoice in to SAP. The using screen T-code is miro.
Inconsistency between a document field and the prof. segment number
*Message no. KE396
*Diagnosis
A line item was assigned to a profitability segment (number 0008629207) which has the value 0000101000 for characteristic Profit Center. The original document (FI document, sales order, internal order, etc.), however, contains 0000102020 in this field. It is therefore inconsistent with the profitability segment found.
System response
The characteristics in Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) must have the same characteristic values as the original document. For example, you cannot assign a sales order to a different customer or product than the one contained in the original sales order. If you wish to fill the characteristics with different contents, you must change the original fields.
Procedure
Enter the correct characteristic values on the CO-PA assignment screen. The system will automatically assign a corresponding profitability segment number. If it is not possible to enter values in some of these fields, delete the entire assignment to a profitability segment number and then enter it again.
As a rule, you should first enter the fields in the original sender document and then make the assignment to a profitability segment.
What should I do for the above pl ?
Regards
Murali

Hi,
While doing PGR at VL32N, we are facing this error. Can someone assist.
Regards,
Aruna

KSV5 - Actual distribution post more than one document

Hi!
I've posted a cost center cycle actual distribution by using KSV5 transaction, cost center group and cost element group. The sys post two or more CO document insted of one and not in a progressive way. Why?
Is it a bug of the system?
Thanks
Giovanna

Hi Giovanna,
As I said, it's normal and should not pose any problem for you. Anyway, if you reverse, for example, the entire cycle results, the system will know to treat all the documents in question via the connection stroed in T811D table. The factors for creation of multiple documents could be various: number of items, controlling subkey value, auxiallary account assignment, etc.
For the 'jumping' of document numbers I wouldn't worry too much as well (though, this issue could be treated via SNR0 transaction), since it's internal CO documents and not FI. In some countries there are regulations which demand consequent document numbers, but this concerns only 'official' FI documents posted in general ledger.
Regards,
Eli

FAGLGA35 - Actual Distribution in New General Ledger accounting

Dears,
In transaction FAGLGA35, system gives below mentioned messages :-
i) No valid sender entries were found. Message no. GA710.
Diagnosis
The system did not find a valid sender for cycle 0LZAWL, segment AWL. The problem can be due to the following reasons:
Master data checking for cycle 0LZAWL, segment AWL, found no valid senders for this segment.
The senders are valid from a master data standpoint, but the system found no posted values or quantities in the database corresponding to your selection criteria. The sender and the segment will be processed only if the cycle works iteratively and at least one sender in another segment receives values which it can then allocate iteratively.
In cycles for indirect activity allocation, this message appears if segment AWL is to allocate posted sender activity quantities but the sender has been completely scheduled. Complete scheduling of posted activity quantities occurs, for example, if you use cycle AWL in a test run but already used it in a current real processing run in the system.
System Response
The system cannot process the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of segment AWL in cycle 0LZAWL. In particular, check the validity of the sender master data for the settlement period.
To do so in cycle maintenance, choose "Formal check".
If segment AWL allocates posted values or quantities, the senders in the segment are valid only if:
The sender holds actually posted values/quantities not equal to 0
The cycle is iterative, and the sender receives values in another segment which it can then allocate iteratively.
If necessary, you must set the iteration indicator in cycle 0LZAWL.
In a cycle for indirect activity allocation, check whether the cycle is currently in use for posting in the system sender in segment AWL and thus completely schedules the senders in segment AWL.
If this is the case, cancel the cycle and repeat the cycle execution.
As per message solution, i do all the things but the same message comes.
ii) Cycle 0LZAWL, start date 20080401, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0LZAWL, starting date 20080401.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
Is anybody have any solution. Please suggest it.
Regards,
Kalpik Shah

s_alr_87012168 : Customer Aging Report (Due Date Analysis for Open Items) this is a report generated.

Actual distribution in New-GL

When executing actual distribution in New-GL using t-code FAGLG35,
System didnu2019t generate PCA document related to it.
So I transferred FI document related to it to PCA document using t-code
1ke8.
How can I transfer FI data to PCA automatically when executing actual distribution?

Hi,
Accounting (EC-PCA) is generally intended to track the profitability of busines units, and therefore, does not automatically include balance sheet accounts. There are, however, many reasons that companies may want to record certain balance sheet items at the profit center level. Our company does this to be able to calculate net investment (AR, AP, inventory, fixed assets, etc) at the profit center level. Asset management has had a huge impact on our profitability, and being to track investment by profit center is part of that.
SAP provides a means for specifying balance sheet accounts to be tracked in PCA. This is done through customizing t-code: 3KEH - EC-PCA: Additional Balance Sheet and Profit + Loss Accounts.
3KEH allows you to set ranges of accounts to be tracked in PCA. This is generally set up during the implmentation of your SAP system, but you may find reasons to make modifications post go-live. If so, youu2019ll need to do this in your development system and transport it into production.
Possible Reasons for Modifying 3KEH
Adding new accounts outside of the ranges established in 3KEH
Deciding post go-live to track an account in PCA
Changing the Default Profit Center on an Account (Default Cost Center can be changed on cost elements in t-code: KA02)
Discovering an account that was missed during implementation. Use t-code: KE5T to compare FI balances with PCA balances.
Options for Adjusting Prior Balances
One of the big gotchas when bringing an existing account into PCA after it already has FI postings is that those postings do not automatically come over. Say youu2019ve discovered youu2019re out of balance between FI and PCA by using KE5T or some other reporting. You determine that it is a 3KEH problem, get your IT people to fix it in Dev and transport it forward. The errant account now shows up in PCA, but itu2019s still out in KE5T (PCA still shows a $0 balance). Thatu2019s because nothing happens with the old FI documents. Adding an account to PCA doesnu2019t automatically generate PCA documents for the missing FI docs, but that would be a neat trick!
So, what are your options?
9KE0 is always an option. The trick here is that the you may have missing FI docs where half of the entry was captured by PCA, while the piece youu2019re trying to fix wasnu2019t. So, now you need to make a one-sided entry to get everything square. To make one-sided entries in 9KE0, you need a document type that allows this. Configuration for this can be accomplished using t-code: GCBX. Just create a new Doc. Type and set the Bal. Check = 2 (no balance check). Thanks to Marco Jordyu2019s excellent article at FICOExpert for this tip.
Use 1KE8 to transfer FI documents to PCA. Again, Marcou2019s article has an excellent write-up on using 1KE8. He suggests that you use FBL3N to determine which documents have been posted to FI for the account you are fixing. Copy those document numbers into the multiple selection for document numbers in 1KE8, using the magical Import from text file button and Copy from clipboard. The big things to watch out for is that youu2019ll want to uncheck the u201CCheck for existing recordsu201D option and check the u201CReversalu201D option. This will prevent SAP from skipping FI documents that already have corresponding PCA documents. It doesnu2019t care that only half of the FI doc is in the PCA doc. It would skip it. Checking the u201CReversalu201D option causes SAP to reverse the existing PCA documents (most likely having only one side of the original FI docs posted) and repost the FI doc, except this time with both sides of the entry.
Final Words
This whole issue hopefully will be a rare occurance for you, but it can be a pain when it does. Particularly since you may have to wait for a fix in Dev and a transport. Itu2019s good to have a spreadsheet with your 3KEH table entries handy when youu2019re creating GL accounts. Just get your IT FICO team to send it over to help you hit those number ranges right.
Regards,
Satish Muvva.

Actual Distribution FAGLGA31 (ECC6.0)

Hi All,
During creation of distribution cycle using tcode: FAGLGA31 - Create, I faced problem of having valid sender, ie: cost center in the segment creation.
In my sender/receiver tab, I can have
Senders as follows:
Account number
Business Area
Functional Area
Profit Center
Currency
Receiver:
Business Area
Functional Area
Profit Center
Question:
Why I cannot have cost center as sender and receiver?
Does anyone know any ECC6.0 (NEW GL) settings that were missed out?
Thanks.
sbmel

Hi ...
I tried to run the Actual distribution cycle FAGLGA35, and I have the follow error:
general messages for cycle 0LFBCA001 01.01.2010 ***********
Cycle 0LFBCA001, start date 20100101, does not include any senders.
General messages for segment FBCA001 ***********************
No valid sender entries were found.
Does anyone have any idea on this?
Extended error message:
==========
Cycle 0LFBCA001, start date 20100101, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0LFBCA001, starting date 20100101.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
==========

4KE5-Actual Distribution for Profit center

I am facing the below error when I execute the 4KE5 for profit center actual distribution. I have maintained the number range but still the same error is there. I defined number range for Document type OC for year 2008.
please advise how to overcome?
"Document number: range not found
Message no. GA703
Diagnosis
An error occurred during document number determination. No range was found for number range object GL_LOCAL, sub-object TTSL.
System Response
No document number was determined. Results could not be updated.
Procedure
Inform the person in charge of number ranges."

When you enter GB02, Click on the Overview icon (Shift +F7)
You should be able to see
Subobject Element           Year             From No.               To No.            NR Status
$$$$                                                         2008                    1           9999999999                   0
                 A0
where $$$$ is your company code, 2008 or 2009 is the year for which you want the number range, along with the document type (AO)
If you cannot see this, then you have not assigned the Number Range to that document type.
Regards,
Sangeeta
Edited by: Sangeeta on Apr 8, 2009 4:57 PM

Execute Actual distribution - KSV5

Hi,
Could some one tell me if there is a BAPI to execute the actual distribution. The regular way is with the transaction KSV5.
Your quick help is appreciated.
Thanks

Hello Tamma,
I have checked off Use Checkboxes and all boxes except Cross-fund and Cross-grant. The option 'Update All CO LIs" radio button to ensure all CO postings integrate back into the FI module documentation states;
Indicator:   Update All CO Line Items to FI Causes all CO line items that are generated with CO-internal allocations to be transferred into Financial Accounting. In this way, Controlling is reconciled with Financial Accounting.
Use   Setting this indicator can produce an undesirably large number of documents in Financial Accounting. SAP therefore recommends setting the indicator for test purposes only.
Would I really use this?   Anybody know how much undesirably large number of documents are produced?
Best regards

Difference between Segment & Business Area

Hi All,
Could any one please help me in explaining what the difference between Segment & Business Area? And what does it mean by We can create financial statements at any time for the Segment dimension. For this, you need to set up a zero balance setting for the Segment characteristic can any one could please help me on this.
And also please explaining what this Document Splitting is? How is it helpful? Please give an example in real time senior. I have already gone through Help document, please dont suggest me that.
Thanks in Advance to all.
Regards,
Giridhar

Dear Giridhar
Earlier in SAP we used to have very limited reporting hierarchies, in which business area is one like Company Code. But obviously in FI or CO either user/ partner/ management always interested in viewing the business on different entities in different forms of reports.
So, with the newGL SAP has given a provenance to users to create their own reporting entities. So, with the newGL customers can generate balance sheets by almost any dimension by defining a SEGMENT, meaning: cost center, plant, etc even you can define business area as a segment.
For this purpose was create the SEGMENT entity. So that it helps customer in segment level reporting.
We Can create financial statements means we can generate balance sheet or profit and loss statement on segment.
For lay mans terms I can tell Business Area is on example of Segment. Hope it clarifies..
In order to understand document split you should be familiar with New GL / Ledger accounting...
Regarding Document Splitting: Consider following realtime example
Invoice ( Example: Split on profit center)
Entry View
Vendor Invoice
PK     Account     Pr.Ctr     Cost.Ctr       Amount
40      Expense    PC01      CC01           400
40      Expense    PC02      CC02           600
31      Vendor                                      1000 -
Say Document number 156123
General Ledger view above document becomes as follows..
PK     Account     Pr.Ctr     Cost.Ctr       Amount
40      Expense    PC01      CC01           400
40      Expense    PC02      CC02           600
31      Vendor      PC01                          400 -
31      Vendor      PC02                          600 -
Suppose you got discount while paying above invoice then
Vendor Payment (entry view)
PK     Account     Pr.Ctr     Cost.Ctr       Amount
25      Payable                                      1000
50      Bank                                             970-
50      Discount                                         30 -
the enhanced document of the above will be as follows... discount will be splitted across profit centers ...
PK     Account     Pr.Ctr     Cost.Ctr       Amount
25      Payable                                      1000
50      Bank                                             970-
50      Discount    PC01      CC01               12 -
50      Discount    PC02      CC02               18-
For the above document the general ledger view will be as follows..
PK     Account     Pr.Ctr     Cost.Ctr       Amount
25      Payable      PC01                          400
25      Payable      PC02                          600
50      Bank           PC01                          388-
50      Bank          PC02                           582-
50      Discount    PC01      CC01               12 -
50      Discount    PC02      CC02               18-
Basically the document split will distribute the money depending on your split method you have configured in SPRO.
Don't confuse too much, it is very easy if you go step by step in SPRO -- especially Finanacial Accounting (new) configuaration.
Hope I tried to answer your query.
Regards
Siva

What's the difference between segment filtering and reduced message type

Hi gurus,
What's the difference between segment filtering and reduced message type? It seems they have the same functionality: Reduce the segment while idoc is generated.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
BD53 is for IDoc Reduction.
this allows you to create a reduced message based upon a standard message type.If you want see mandatory fields. go to T-coe BD53 and give one standard messege type name and eg: matmas
there mandatory fields will be in Green color..
And BD56- This transaction is used to filter out segments of IDocs for combination of sender and receiver. This is usefull in scenarios where a standard IDoc with many segments is used but the receiving partner is only interested in some of the segments
the table related to this transation is TBD20
please go through below blog you have an idea abt that,
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/ReducedMessageTypes
http://saptotal.com/IDoc%20Segment%20Filtering.html
regards,
ganesh.

Separate document no. for SD revision document and detagging relationship between invoice and SD document no.

HI,
Country specific settings for India - Business transactions enables SD revision vide table TE872_SDCTRL_IND.
Whenever SD revision takes place system issue similar document no. as that of invoice and tagged it with XBLNR as per standard process.
Now issue that if that invoice is reversed, subsequent SD also gets reversed.
So business requires to have separate document no. for SD revision document and detagged relationship between invoice and SD document no.
I have explored event R507, 0010, 0060 and R436 but couldn't find input structure where such separate document can be assigned.
So can you provide hint which can assist in issue resolution?
Regards,
Paresh

Check this thread, if this helps.
[url] Link between MKPF table and EKKO or RBKP table [url]
I've done this as well earlier to create a custom document flow for archived documents where from the EBELN i've found all the related documents. Hope this helps.

Whats the actual difference between Business system and Business service

whats the actual difference between Business system and Business service

Business System
1) Business system is a logical system, and there is an importance on physical existence of the system.
2) Also SLD entry is required.
3)It is generally used for SAP applications, this is just a general prinicple followed but not mandatory.
4)This is defined as part of the SLD and is a physical system whose parameters are well defined.
5(Business systems refers to the physical systems, for instance the R/3 system. You define the business systems in the SLD
Business Service
1) You use a Business Service, when you do not have the System details of the the partner system to which you want to communicate. i.e. you have not configured the partner system in SLD.
2) Business Service is an Absract Unit with Sender and Receiver Interfaces,In this case you need to explicitly add the message interfaces while doing configuration in ID.
3) It is generally used for NON-SAP applications, this is just a general prinicple followed but not mandatory.
4) This is not defined as part of SLD and whose technical parameters are not completely known.
5)Business service is used when the message is not addressed to a business system. It is used mostly in B2B scenarios.
Also go through these links and threads...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/c7/301640033ae569e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/80243b4a66ae0ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Business service or Business system??
Business Service vs Business System in Integration Directory.
Best Regards

Reversal of Actual Distribution (KSV5 or 4KE5) possible?

Hi Gurus,
Would it be possibtle to reverse actual distribution of expenses or income? If yes, what is the transaction code? If no, what is the premise for this?
Thanks and best regards

hi
this KSV5 Transaction itself have Reverse option in the Main menu

Message GA603 when I'm create a Actual Distribution Cycle

Hi,
I'm trying to create a actual distribution cycle (transaction KSV1) and when I choose "Receiver Tracing Factor" to plan percent, I receive the error message GA603.
I need to do distribution from cost center to internal order group. Firstly, I created a order group.
Could anybody help me?
Thanks,
Osmar Tardivo.

I think it has something to do with the Internal Order group selection in the Receiver values.
Have you created the Group using GS01>Creating Set>with table CCSS and field AUFNR and then assign the values of internal order which you would want to group it.
Then assign the internal order group created in receiver and try to click on the Receiving Tracing Factor...
I hope this helps.

Actual difference between exterprise oracle 9i/10edition & standard edition

hi,
i want to know the actual difference between exterprise oracle 9i/10edition & standard edition.
plz reply me.
thanks,
regards.

For 10g
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/oracle10g/pdf/twp_general_10gdb_product_family.pdf
For 9i
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/oracle9i/pdf/o9i_family_features.pdf
HTH
Girish Sharma

FI document on actual distribution between segments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for