Final issue after DLV status

Hi guru,
i have this problem: i set manually the flag 'Delivery completed' in my production order (even the GR is 0). I thought that in this way also the reservation of the components should be deleted. this is not happened. It is possible to close it in an automathic way? I don't want to use CO11N (or similar).
thanks a lot for your help.
Maria Grazia

Hi,
DLV will not clear any reservation. You can still post any goods movement and MIGO will show the reservation quantities. RESB table will not be cleared on DLV.
So, you have to TECO the order to clear reservations.
What do you mean by "Automatic way" ? If you are looking for mass transaction, then you can TECO from COHV transactions for required set of orders at once.
Thanks
Prem

Similar Messages

Airport issue after update - Status grey / Connection OK - Solved

Hello All,
Just wanted to share an issue I had that was driving me nuts, and then the final solution.
Ever since the recent airport extreme update, my airport status has been broken. The menubar icon has shown up as grey / no signal, and when I click on it, the only option I have is to 'turn airport on' which when selected does nothing.
In spite of this, though, my airport connection for my preferred network is working fine - I just can't select a new network off the list (there is no list, even in internet connect)
This has been a problem since the airport extreme update. Nothing I did seemed to help. Finally, I called apple and spent 45 minutes on the phone with them, doing the obligatory pram resets and power management resets, etc. Nothing seemed to help. We found a way to enter networks manually (go to system prefs / network / airport and add your network there) but the status problem was still there.
After I got off the phone, I went to the apple support page and found the airport extreme software update and downloaded it manually and installed it.
Manually Downloading and Installing the airport extreme update again solved the problem.
I don't know why the software-update version didn't quite work, but installing the update from the website did solve the gray / broken airport status menubar problem.
Just thought I'd share that with everyone, as it's been driving me nuts for the better part of a week.
Cheers!
JayK
Macbook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.8) 2G ram

I would like to confirm that update worked for me too. Actually, I didn't need to do it manually like some of you did. It worked straight away after automatic software update.
My problem was occasional inability to connect to my wireless router. The problem would have been solved by SSID change manually on the router and reconnection.
After the latest update, everything is working flawlessly.
I have (not so known) OZENDA router and didn't have Parallels installed.
MacBook Pro C2D 17'' 2.33GHz Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Final Issue Indicator not set in maitnenance order after ECC 6.0 upgrade

Hi,
We encounter this problem after upgrading to ECC6.0 from SAP R/3 4.6C
Final issue indicator (RESBD-KZEAR) is not being set in maintenance order (IW33) for sub-component non-stock items in General Data page
Would be great if anyone could guide in this regard
Detailed Scenario:
1) Maintenance Order is created (IW31) is created in plant A
2) For non-stock items, reservation created by maintenance order creates a purchase requisition
3) Account Assigned STO (against maintenance order) is created from purchase requisition
4) Transfer Posting done from Plant B (351 movement) for complete qty
5) GR at Plant A done (101 movement) for complete qty.
6) Final Issue Indicator is not set in General Data page eventhough the complete quantity is delivered.
Thanks
Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 8:59 PM
Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 9:00 PM
Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 9:03 PM

Hi,
Please check in the STO if the "Delivery completed" indicator is checked or not?
If Yes, then search some correction notes of SAP and get it implemented or raise OSS message with SAP to get the Final Issue indicator to be set in maintenance order.
If No, then ask your MM consultants to investigate that. They can check the config of "Goods Receipt" Or check if the total quantity GR has been done Or some Under delivery/ Over delivery tolerance has been maintained.
Thanx.
Nilmoni.

Status 51 qty and/or delivery completed ind or final issue ind are missing

i am using we19 to test an inbound idoc mbgmcr02
i get status 51 qty and/or delivery completed ind or final issue ind are missing
i have the quantity filled in.
so i must need the delivery completed ind or final issue ind filled in.
i cannot find either or these???can anyone point me to them???
also on the e1BP2017_gm_code i am using 02.
can anyone give me a rundown on the valid codes to use here and what they mean

Hi Janice,
i saw your posting and we are also having the same issue and when i trie to open the link, it's not opening ' page not found'.
we are having an issue while moving the stock to vendor maintained stock.
The scenario is:
We have an externally processed operation in prod. ord and 2 of the components in the prod.ord are batch managed.( These components can have multiple batches) so when we released the prod.ord, P.Req and PO are getting created automatically. here we have two scenarios:
1. When we are maintaining single batch for the 2 components and release the prod.ord, every thing works fine i.e. stock is moving to vendor maintained stock i.e 541(o).
2. The problem is when we are maintaining multiple batches for the same components, the P.req and PO are getting created but stock is not moving to vendor maintained stock i.e 541(o)
when we debugged it's giving this message: " Qty and / or "delivery completed" ind. or final issue ind. are missing ".
Do i need to make any settings or am i making any mistake?
Plz guide me and it will be really helpful if anybody can give some steps to follow.
Thank you ,
kanth

Problem with final issue of production order components

Hi Gurus,
Currently we have a problem with the production order components.
The problem is that, we needed some components (components which are categorized as dangerous goods) deleted from the production orders.
So we tried to manually tick the final issue indicator and save the production order. However, the reservations reappeared after the MRP Run.
Hence, we then tried to delete the component line items, but then again the reservations reappeared.
Also, since the components are externally procured materials, new purchase requisitions are generated by MRP for these materials.
Kindly request your help on the same.
Thanks and Regards,
Sanju

Hi Kiran,
Please find the screenshots of MD04 for the header and component in the attachment:
MD04 for Header:
MD04 for Component:
For the header material no entry is available for 07.01.2015 as the status is delivered for the production order of the header material.
Kindly help me with the same.
Thanks,
Sanju

Final issue indicator for component

Hi
I have requirement to set final issue indicator to all components when process order has DLV status.
We have confirmation configuration which will set final issue indicator when operation is finally confirmed.
Iam using special control key to identify operation for which components are attached
If i use COHVPI mass confirmation then it confirms all operations though i select special control key in layout filter. We dont want to confirm all operations
Is there any STANDARD way to do mass confirmation of selected operation / phases. ?
Or
Is there is any STANDARD way to set final issue indicator for all process order components, when order is delivered?

Hi Caetano
My requirement is to do this in background with confirmation of only one operation for which i have special identifier like control key.
I dont want to confirm other operations.

Has anyone upgraded the Ironport ESA to 8.5.6-074 and had the issues of Raid status showing unknown?

Has anyone upgraded the Ironport ESA to 8.5.6-074 and had the issues of Raid status showing unknown? After we upgraded our appliances we are having issues with our ESA appliances showing the RAID status as unknown. When we reported the issue to CISCO we were updated there were no issues reported at all. Could anyone please confirm if you have experienced the same issue.

You should see OPTIMAL - meaning the drives in the C170 are in good health/status:
myc680.local> version
Current Version
===============
UDI: C680 V FCH1611V0B2
Name: C680
Product: Cisco IronPort C680 Messaging Gateway(tm) Appliance
Model: C680
Version: 8.5.6-074
Build Date: 2014-07-21
Install Date: 2014-07-29 11:16:34
Serial #: xxx-yyy1611Vzzz
BIOS: C240M3.1.4.5.2.STBU
RAID: 3.220.75-2196, 5.38.00_4.12.05.00_0x05180000
RAID Status: Optimal
RAID Type: 10
BMC: 1.05
There are times post-reboot, that you'll see and get notification of RAID sub-optimal --- meaning that the appliance is running through on a health-check of the appliance's RAID. You should be getting a notification once RAID status has returned to OPTIMAL, or as per the older OS revisions, READY:
myc170.local> version
Current Version
===============
UDI: C170 V01 FCH1428V06A
Name: C170
Description: Cisco IronPort C170
Product: Cisco IronPort C170 Messaging Gateway(tm) Appliance
Model: C170
Version: 7.6.3-019
Build Date: 2013-06-09
Install Date: 2014-09-12 13:52:24
Serial #: xxxxxxD87B39-yyyyyy8V06A
BIOS: 9B1C115A
RAID: 02
RAID Status: READY
RAID Type: 1
BMC: 2.01

DLV status not updated in Process order

Hi guys,
I did GR and got goods receipt documents but system is not updating DLV status in process order.
Actually i have by-product and co-products as components in order. I did posting of by-product from Confirmation screen COR6N and for co-products i did MB31 and goods movement doc. get generated. Qty. is also updated in order but NOT the dlv status.
Pl.suggest

Dear,
This is System status and you cannnot maintain it manually once that Business Transaction(FULL Delivery) happens System will automatically sets that status.
DLV status updated once Del completed tick is activated in order header, This tick will get uodated once you do GR for complete qty.
You need to Final confirm (CNF) the Order to get the DLV Status.
Or if the Delivery completed indicator is set in the Process Order, then also th System status will be DLV.
If you want to make it manually then goto co02, enter the order, goto goods receipt tab page and activate delivery completed tick and save...DLV is activated in the head as status.
Please check in BS22-I0012
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Autoconfig issue after upgrading 12.1.1 to 12.1.3

Hi all,
I am getting below mention autoconfig issue after upgrading 12.1.1 to 12.1.3.
jtfictx.sh started at Mon Mar 28 08:28:50 EDT 2011
SQL*Plus: Release 10.1.0.5.0 - Production on Mon Mar 28 08:28:50 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Enter value for 1: Enter value for 2: Enter value for 3: Connected.
DECLARE
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29858: error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXALTER routine
ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
DRG-10561: index JTF_AMV_ITEMS_URL_CTX is not valid for requested operation
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.DRUE", line 160
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.TEXTINDEXMETHODS", line 665
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQL", line 1199
ORA-06512: at line 96
Disconnected from Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Product
ion
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
jtfictx.sh exiting with status 1
ERRORCODE = 1 ERRORCODE_END
.end std out.
.end err out.
i got below mention some solution from metalink, but that does not working.
https://support.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&doctype=BULLETIN&id=743720.1
according to note we need to create index but its giveing below metion error.
SQL> @jtfiaibu.sql jtf jtf apps
Connected.
DECLARE
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29855: error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXCREATE routine
ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
DRG-10758: index owner does not have the privilege to use file or URL datastore
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.DRUE", line 160
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.TEXTINDEXMETHODS", line 366
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQL", line 1199
ORA-06512: at line 37
Thanks in advance,
Sandeep.

Hi,
DRG-10561: index JTF_AMV_ITEMS_URL_CTX is not valid for requested operationPlease make sure you have no invalid objects. And also please see of these helps. I know these are for older version, but please check
Script jtfictx.sh Failed While Attempting To Run The Autoconfig On APPS Tier [ID 1271186.1]
Autoconfig Returns ORA-29868 from jtfictx.sh [ID 386740.1]
By the way did u iinstall companion/examples CD after installing OracleSoftware
Thanks,
Taher

Final Issue Check box ticked still PR does no get deleted

Even after ticking the Final Issue check box for a material whose Procurement Parameter is (Requisition + reservation for WBS element ) the requisition does not get deleted. It is still showing up in Md04 transaction. Can anyone let me know the reason. Waiting for your feedback.
Harsh

Hi Harsh,
If the PR is already created, Please go to the PR and in the line item Quantity/dates tab, please tick "Closed". then the requirement should go off from MD04.
warm regards,
Srinivas Potluri

CO19 - Backflush - Final Issue

Hello,
We are running into an issue with the final issue indicator for components when we are using CO19 to confirm orders. The Process is that we first complete a B10 (Processing Started), then a B40 (Processing Finish), then a V40 to complete the variable activity finish. The reason we are doing the V40 is because we are using BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TE, which cannot set the field FIN_CONF with the B40 (note 1230750), so the V40 (finally confirmed) will complete the final confirmation.
Here is the issue:
After the B40 record is processed, inventory tries to relieve for all back flushed materials. If there is NO inventory available to back flush, an error will appear in COGI, and the order reservation will stay in MD04. This is desired. However, once the V40 activity is completed (finally confirmed), the problem is that the Finial Issue Flag in the Production order is also getting checked. With the final issue flag being checked, it is removing the order reservation in MD04 for the back flushed material that is still in COGI. Because the error is still in COGI, we DO NOT want the Finial Issue flag checked, which will allow the order reservation to remain in MD04.
Is there something we are missing in configuration that will prevent the order reservation from being removed from MD04 if the material is not yet issued to the production order? In OPK4 we do not have the "Post Open Reservations" box checked.
I appreciate any help.
Thank you.

Hello Ann400,
I am afraid that there is no simple solution. If you set - for whatever reason - the FIN_CONF indicator, this leads automatically to final delivery indicator as well as final issue indicators for the components. This is a system design and it is idependent from the confirmed quantity even if it is zero -> therefore COGI records are not considered.
As a workaround you may think about not to call the BAPI for the V40 (because you're calling it just for the final indicators) as long as COGI records from the B40 exist. This would solve your issue. But this is something you need to do in your source code environment.
Hope this helps.
Regards, Andreas

How to deactivate automatic setting of final issue indicator in reservation

Our client has a requirement to deactivate the automatic setting of the final issue indicator after the reserved quantity on a reservation has been fulfilled.
The requirement comes from an overnight shift that does not have access to the SAP system, so the final issue indicator that is automatically set after the reserved quantity is fulfilled cannot be reset manually when the material is needed during the overnight shift.
I do not believe backflushing is an option because the material is issued to a cost center (orders are managed outside SAP) and thus there is no confirmation.
Is there a standard method for deactivating the automatic setting of the final issue indicator when the reserved quantity is reacched?
Thanks.

Bob_Smith1103 wrote:
The requirement comes from an overnight shift that does not have access to the SAP system, so the final issue indicator that is automatically set after the reserved quantity is fulfilled cannot be reset manually when the material is needed during the overnight shift.
Please see my earlier comment that the overnight shift does not have access to SAP and therefore cannot manually reset the final issue indicator until the next day when someone with SAP access is present.
Obviously the goods issue could wait until the next day, but the client is not satisfied with waiting until the next day to post-process the goods issue.

Monitor Issues after upgrading Mac Mini OS to Mavericks

I upgraded my older Mac Mini OS to Mavericks. The monitor always worked fine on Snow Leopard (10.6.8 I think), but now my Hanns G monitor takes fifteen minutes to display anything. Until then it is blank and makes clicking, popping noises every 3-5 seconds. After it comes up, it works fine and all the settings seem to be correct. Any ideas? Many thanks for any help you can provide.

Some more info: the monitor is a Hanns G HC194D and is set for 1280 x 1024 with a NVIDIA GeForce 9400 256 MB graphics. My Mac Mini has a 2.26 GHz Intel Core Duo processor and has 2 GB 1067 Mhz DDR4 memory. The monitor display profile says it was created two weeks ago which strikes me as a bit odd, but I updated the OS well before then and this has been an issue since I updated to OS 10.9.3. I have played around with the cables and the connections are tight, and once the monitor finally displays after 15 minutes or so on start-up or deep sleep, the monitor looks and runs fine.
It seems too coincidental that this problem only surfaced after upgrading the OS for it to be a monitor hardware issue, but I haven't seen any other reports of this type of problem. This is a very frustrating problem, so thanks for reading this far.

Iphone 5 issues after IOS 8.2 update: my husband's phone and my phone get the same phone calls ONLY when we are home. Any suggestions on where to look to fix this?

Iphone 5 issues after IOS 8.2 update: all the iphones in the house receive the same phone calls ONLY while we are at home. Any ideas on how to fix this?

That is a new "feature" described in Connect your iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch using Continuity
You can turn it off by going to Settings > FaceTime and changing "iPhone Cellular Calls" to off

Authorization issue after the Support packs upgrade

We're having problem on authorization issue after the SP upgrade.
One issue if "You are not authorized to call up line item display" using FCH1 and FS10N tcodes.
And the SU53 showing problem on S_TCODE FAGLL03.
How are we going to solve this issue? We dont want to add this missing auth object on all our finance roles.
Thank you in advance.

How can i send you the trace file? What is your email address?
If I were you, I won't do that. Did you not ever sign some confidentiality agreement? I wonder.
Anyhoo... (copy right @ David)
What are the objects been caught in category RC=4, RC=12?
Relate them with functional aspect of the transaction (error screen)
Edited : You can paste RC=4, RC=12 objects here without customer specific value if you want to.
Regards,
Arpan Paik
Edited by: P Arpan on Aug 23, 2011 2:36 PM

Final issue after DLV status

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for