FOC item relation with standard item

Hi All,
I am new to SAP SD. I have small doubt related to FOC item relation with standard item. When i enter standard item in sales order automatically free of charge item coming as sub item.
Please tell me where do we create link between standard item and FOC item so that once standard item entered in sales order automatically free item will come into sales order.
Regards
Ashok

If I am understanding you correctly, you will maintain this using VOV4
go to your order type
find the Item category from the material master for the material you are using (NORM,DIEN,etc)
enter your high level item category for sales order (standard Item) (item categories that are defined in VOV7)
then enter your default item category for sales order (sub items)
I hope this helps you in the right direction. Please advise

Similar Messages

FOC items with bill rate as "0" are not appearing in project invoice

Customer has a unique requirement of billing resources working on the project for free due to business reasons.
The issue is that the FOC items with bill rate as "0" are not appearing when the invoice is generated.
Please let me know if any one has come across this kind of a requirement and please share if you have any workaround.

Hi
You may try setting the bill rate for those cases as 0.01.
That way the items will be included in the invoice, but not affect dramatically the amount billed to customer.
Dina

FOC items with Capital Equipments

Hi,
I received some spares with an equipment free of charge. Where should i keep these spares in stock??.....What if I buy same spare part after sometime what will be its moving price then??

As you are saying your spare part is stockable item, then you have to keep it in storage location you want to.
Also this is FOC item, next time when you procure this item, your MAP will change (Total Stock value/ Total quantity).

Updation of FOC item for multiple customers at a time

Freinds,
I have an issue regarding Free Goods item updation using T code - VBN1. Normally we are updating an FOC item with the main line item along with quantity(exclusive or inclusive) for a particular period. The same process will repeat for each customer code using the T code. My question is, whether there is any option to update the same set of FOC item for multiple set of customers at a time, instead of entering one by one for each customers. Please help me out in this. Thanks.

If this is going to be a regular exercise, then you need to consider to add one more combination of Customer / Material based on which, you can create LSMW and make use of it regularly. This is straight and simple approach to achieve the desired result. On the other hand, if you dont want to touch your existing configuration, then you have to copy the standard program SAPMV13N, create a BDC, add input parameters as you wish and upload.
G. Lakshmipathi

HOW KIND OF Standard table related with vk11, vk12 and vk13?

HI, EVERYONE,
HOW KIND OF Standard table related with vk11, vk12 and vk13?
I want to know about how many and how kind Standard table related with vk11, vk12, vk13.
I'v found some table like konp and a601 ~ a609, also I want to know about those table of uses?
I am starting to study about vk11.
please help me.

Hi Reena,
Then main pricing related tables are KONH header details, and KONP item details.
The other tables your have mentioned like A601,A609.............. all these are condition tables, which stored the values which you save for access sequence combination.
Eg : For condition type PR00, lets us assume one key combination customer/material, so these details will be saved in condition table which is initially generated with fields as a part of condition techinque.
So here the table would be A005 i guess or its A006.
So like wise there will be condition tables for each key combination.
Regards
v K

Shedule agreement for foc item

how to make shedule agreement for foc item in purchase

Hi
In standard design there is no such option available
to create scheduling agreement with free item flag.
I have done some research into this issue and what I have found in the
code is:
MM06EF0W_WE_RE_KENNZEICHEN
IF ekpo-webre NE space.
    IF ekpo-wepos EQ space OR
       ekpo-repos EQ space.
      MESSAGE e160.
    ENDIF.
So if ekpo-webre (Indicator: GR-based invoice verification)
is set and wepos (Goods Receipt Indicator) or
repos (Invoice receipt indicator) are not set, then you will get this
error. You need to turn off GR-based invoice verification or you will
need to have one of the other indicators set.
I understand that you are trying to avoid using these indicators but
that can't be done in standard for a schedule agreement. Purchase orders
are different and use different coding. If you wish to have this
behavior you should be using a purchase order.

Free of Charge (FOC) items Should not be posted to Cost of sales

Hi all,
We are in ECC 6.
SD Requirement: In sales order, we create line items. Once DO is created , we post PGI. At this point
Cr Stock A/C 19000 Dr Cost of sales 45000. We do not Dr GL 45000 for FOC items. We want to use another GL for this.
How can I set up this?
Thanks in advance

Hi all, Tks for the solution. Issue is resolved now.
I have done following config to get the desired outcome.
Config Steps:
MM Config:
1.New mvt type 901 created by copying std mvt 601.
2.In account grouping account modifier VAX was replaced by ZAX for WA01 -2 -GBB & WA03 -2 -GBB
3.In OBYC Copy GBB-0001-VAX 3100 Old GL to GBB-0001-ZAX 3100 NewGL
SD Config
4.In VOV6 Maintain Sch line cat. Cretate Z2 by Copying CN   and change mvt type from 601 to 901
No separate item cat or delivery type is created .
Transaction Steps:
1. VA01:Create Sales order with Two line items one with item cat TAN and second with item cat TANN.
   For line item 2, Change Sch line cat to Z2
2. VL01N :Create delivery with std type LF > TO>Confirm-->PGI.
     Accounting entries, for first line item       Cr: Stock A/C Dr: cost of sales
                                     for second line item Cr: Stock A/c Dr: New GL
3.VF01: Billing doc created. Accounting entries Dr Trade Debtors Cr Sales Revenue

Landed Costs cannot be added for FOC item

Dear Expert,
Good morning, recently our Company have upgraded to SAP Business One 2007 A (8.00.178) SP: 00 PL: 42, when we add a landed costs with FOC item, the system does not allow us to add the document.
Please help.
Regards,
Ng

HII
Can you post the error what you are getting
You can refer to the Documentation on Landed Costs 2007A if it is helpfull to you
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_FRAME=CONTAINER&_HIER_KEY=701100035871000520489&_OBJECT=011000358700000463992008E&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000183&
Good Luck
Rizz

Treatement of normal and FOC item in inventory

Dear Experts,
We have a requirement in which same material has to be in stock with value and as FOC item also. (We don't want averaging of price)
Business Scenario: Stock of item A is 100 QTY with value 1000 $. Vendor provides as special stock (For demo/display purpose) of the same item with 0 value. Both the stock exist in our inventory, i.e 100 qty with 1000 $ and 10 qty at 0 price. After the promotion period we need to transfer this stock to normal stock with normal stock value.
How we can achieve this. Kindly help.
Thanks & Regards
Ranjit Simon

Hi,
   You may check the concept of split valuation in this case. Create two valuation types - one for normal material and one for FOC, so that you can valuate them separately. Refer the doc: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d09889cd-5df5-2d10-979c-8f11abbba28d?overridelayout=t… and Split Valuation Activation & its Material Master creation
    After sales promotion, you may transfer post the material from FOC valuation type to normal valuation type using 309 movement. Refer the help doc: Transfer Posting, From Valuation Type to Valuation Type (SAP Library - MM - Material Price Change (MM-IV-MP))
    If split valuation activation is not feasible, since the material is already in use (as explained by Jurgen), either you may create a new material and activate split valuation for the material and use the material code instead of the existing material code, OR you may create a separate material code for FOC purchase and then transfer post stock to original material using 309 movement after the sales promotion.
Regards,
AKPT
Message was edited by: AKPT MM

FOC items received from vendor...

Hi Experts,
I have a FOC item which receive from vendor. Which module i should use for good receipt? Goods Receipt PO or Goods Receipt?
Thanks.
Regards,
Danny

Hi Danny,
Use Goods Receipt PO Document in Purchase Module.
In Goods Receipt PO Document Unit Price is entered as Zero.
*Close the thread if issue solved.
Regards
Jambulingam.P

CVD / ED avail for FOC items

Dear All.
My client receives FOC items from both Import and Domestic vendors , they want to avail the CVD/ED alone for those items, please let me know if i need to include new condition types in PO pricing to take credit of CVD/ED or any other way to address this scenario. Your input is much appreciated.
Thanks
Benny

hi
you cant do any pricing for free goods as there is no base for calculating ED/CVD
you have make the Fi adjustments for the excise duty
or
create free goods PO give tax code of excise duty
the values will be zero
now in migo select capture and post and just enter the base and other excise value manually
ithink this will work for you

CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

Dear Members,
The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
Any help/clues?
Regards
Satya

Hi,
In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
regards
Waman

Basic system struggling with Standard Def MPG files

We built two news editors about 6 months ago and needed to build both computers for $1200. These were replacing two old Avid Newscutter XP systems from 2004...
Because we were shooting DVCAM on DSR-250 camera's or to .mov/.avi DV files on nNovia QC Decks on the camera's, the files were basic DV 25Mbps content in SD.
Based on the System Requirements of Adobe for Premiere CS5, I didn't feel I needed to build these as top end machines at the time.
They are as follows:
MSI Motherboard 77T-C45 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130270
AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition 3.2 GHz http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103846
Seagate Barracuda 80GB C: Boot Drive, Page File http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148231
Reused 1 TB Samsug 7200 rpm SATA Scratch drive from Avid system. E:\ Projects, raw files, Media cache files
Corsair XMS2 4GB (2x2GB) Dual Channel http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145184
PNY nVidia Quadro FX 380 256 MB 128-bit GDDR3 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814133274
Corsair 400W Power supply http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139008
Looking back at it now, and after reading a lot of posts, these systems are on the low end. Guess that is how Adobe gets more people to buy software, make it look like it will run on what you have, after you shell out the cash on the program you realize you have to upgrade hardware too..
The systems have been working great for the SD footage we needed them for. We are not going HD anytime soon as our entire studio, routers, switcher, CG, playout system, studio camera's and pretty much everything else would need updating. So I wanted editors that were more user friendly and would handle what we were working with and that is what I got. Figured in 3-5 years when HD comes along for us it will be time for entire new system on CS7 with 30 cores, 1 TB of memory and such... (More's Law)...
So new twist to the issue. We were having a lot of issues with camera's dying the last few months. It was getting hard to keep the DSR-250s working and even though I can buy them for $1000-$1500 used off of e-bay and they are in way better shape than ours, they were big, bulky and our reporters "one man band" it a lot and two of the young women are just shy of 5 foot. You should see a petite little reporter lug a huge shoulder mount camera up onto the tripod and run it when it is bigger than them.. Really funny!!
So I pushed for new camera's and found the new Sony HXR-NX5U met all our needs in that it is a Z1/Z5 style camera (smaller format) but has "NO TAPE"...Shoots to SD cards and a 4 GB class 2 gives 58 min each in SD.
It will shoot HD as AVCHD 24Mbps files and does SD as Mpeg-2 and 9 Mbps with AC3 audio. I demo'd a camera from Sony and did a lot of testing with it, I played a few clips on the CS5 systems and everything seemed ok. They did require a quick render and I think that has to do with the Mpeg-2 compression. It is about 1/4-1/2 time render so a 5 minute clip will take 1-2.5 minutes roughly to render out. Playback is ok even when not rendered but the video looks fuzzy on the CRT monitor looped off of our Firewire DSR-11 DVCAM deck. Not a big deal, they can edit and render at the end before dumping to tape.
Problem that came up today (we just started using the new camera's this week), when I went to diagnose system crashing, I found a simple news package on the timeline. Maybe 40 small clips, edited into a package, with simple edits. It was already rendered but I noticed the fan on the system was running fast which only happens if the CPU is working hard. (Front Case Fan 120mm is on the CPU fan header PWM control, CPU fan is on Northbridge fan connector non-PWM controlled) So the CPU fan (stock) is running at full speed but I used the MB temp monitoring to control the front fan so I could have a quiet system when it is not working hard.
That led me to open the task manager. I found that the CPU is running along at 94-98% for both Cores. Ram is ok as Premiere was using about 1.8GB of the 4 GB in the system. I checked the other system and it was doing the same thing.
What is odd, is premiere is just sitting there with a timeline open, mpeg-2 clips on it and me not doing anything it stays at 92% continually. I even close the project so I am out at the "new project" "Open Project" screen and no change. If I hit exit, then the CPU drops right away down to 7% and is fine. Open premiere back up into a project and CPU goes right back up. During a timeline Render it is 100%.
We are able to edit and they seem to work but it is causing the system to run Hot and is running the CPU at near max all the time. I added two more 80mm fans out the back that will help pull more hot air out.
Is my chip way to slow for mpeg? is there a setting that I must change to optimize editing mpeg-2? I am assuming it is the work to decode the video on the fly, something the DV video didn't require so much CPU for. I am not using GPU acceleration as I do not have a card that supports it even with the hack that I know of. And GPU Acc. doesn't work for DV firewire output either.
I am considering the following:
1. Buy larger aftermarket CPU cooler and overclock my chip as many say this "Black Edition" with an unlocked multiplier is a breeze to overclock up to 4 Ghz range. (but still only 2 cores)
2. Buy a replacement 4 or 6 core processor to replace it (also with the better than stock Cooler from above)
The only problem is having to spend so much money on additional hardware.
I am also going to optimize Windows 7 on these editors as I think Areo is running and other none essential things.
The big question is why is it maxing out when doing NOTHING????? Is it just trying to build that freeze frame on the screen as it is a picture between the I- frames? (i.e. not a real frame of video but one created by decoding the info of IPPBPPIPPBPPI etc.)
Any idea's/help would be great. Anyone else using this camera and the SD files? I didn't think this would be an issue as I had read post that people were editing this kind of stuff on CS3 a few years back. Can't believe it would cause a newer system so much grief..
Mark

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}Harm Millaard wrote:
As you may have seen I posted your results. Your statement:
Looking back at it now, and after reading a lot of posts, these systems are on the low end.
is damn accurate. 8-th rank from the bottom and around 32 x slower than a fast system, out of nearly 200 systems tested. For DV that is still perfectly acceptable, but for AVCHD it is not enough.
Your problem is the same in every industry. One can increase productivity and reduce hazards or improve working conditions (like less bulky and heavy cameras), but only at a price, by investing in new technology. It makes no sense to only invest in new cameras, without also investing in new computer equipment. It would be similar to investing in new production machinery in a plant, but postponing the training required for employees to properly use that new machinery. IMO that is a typical example of 'penny-wise, pound foolish'.
When I built these systems 8 months ago, I was originally going to get CS4, then I read on the site the CS5 was just around the corner, didn't want to buy the version on it's way out so I held off. I had never been to this forum, wish I had, things might be different.... I went off of this list when deciding what we would need:
Intel® Core™2 Duo or AMD Phenom® II processor; 64-bit support required
64-bit operating system required: Microsoft® Windows Vista® Home Premium, Business, Ultimate, or Enterprise with Service Pack 1 or Windows® 7
2GB of RAM (4GB or more recommended)
10GB of available hard-disk space for installation; additional free space required during installation (cannot install on removable flash-based storage devices)
7200 RPM hard drive for editing compressed video formats; RAID 0 for uncompressed
1280x900 display with OpenGL 2.0–compatible graphics card
Adobe-certified GPU card for GPU-accelerated performance
Adobe-certified card for capture and export to tape for SD/HD workflows
OHCI-compatible IEEE 1394 port for DV and HDV capture, export to tape, and transmit to DV device
Sound card compatible with ASIO protocol or Microsoft Windows Driver Model
DVD-ROM drive compatible with dual-layer DVDs (DVD+-R burner for burning DVDs; Blu-ray burner for creating Blu-ray Disc media)
QuickTime 7.6.2 software required for QuickTime features
Broadband Internet connection required for online services*
I understand competely now that these systems are too slow, Adobe's own specs are way to low. I knew I was on the low end but the problem is we built them for DV so I wasn't expecting them to do much more than that. According to Adobe, I was in the (recommended Spec, not even the minimum...) If I was wanting to attempt AVCHD right now I would start over, but the desire now is to edit .mpg clips. It seems to be able to do that but when we have a few on the timeline and they are rendered the CPU just maxes out for no reason. But I have trouble duplicating it myself...
Today I went in and there was one .mpg clip on a timeline. I checked the CPU and it was running at 98%. I closed that project, started a new one with standard DV NTSC same as the reporters. Imported the same .mpg file that was on this reporters project. I placed it on the timeline just as she had it and did some cuts and worked with it for over 5 minutes. Rendered it all and the CPU looked fine, maybe 40-50% in bursts. Playing it would cause it to go up some, stop it would go down. Could not get it to do what it was doing for her. Closed my project re-opened hers and boom CPU to 98% again.
here are some screenshots:
You can see here is where opening her project caused the spike. Then not doing anything with Premiere it just floats along the top...
Media Cache on E:\ Drive, same as the project and .mpg file. 1 TB 7200 RPM drive.
Proceses that are running, mspaint only running as that is what I did the paste of the Alt+Print Screen to grab the task manager with.

Issue in generating Invoice with standard and service material

There is one scenario where along with standard material (i.e Tube bending machine) they charge the customer for the Design and Development of a machine (which is a service). Is it possible to make a standard order with the standard material(with excise and cst/vat) and service material (with service tax only) in one single order?
I have tried with both the material in a single order but while making invoice system is taking only the standard material as in item category we have mentioned Billing relevance from delivery document. And service material will not have the delivery.
I would be thankful if you could spare some time and check the exact problem.

Hello,
Yes.. this is a common problem when you use Delivery relevent material and service material in the same order. Why don't you use the service material in differnt order and invoice it? or do you have any restriction like the delivery relevent material and the service material should be billed in one invoice?
Prase

Table Relation with Payment and Invoice of Vendor

Hi all,
     I have one question about Table Relation with Payment and Invoice of Vendor.
     the scenario is.
     2 Purchase Order number : 100000001/100000002
     1 Invoice document number : 200000001 which include 2 Purchase Order.
     1 Payment document number : 300000001
     How should I found out table relation from Payment document number - Invoice document number - Purchase Order number. ?
      I try to link the following table, but it does not work.
      RBKP     *     Invoice Receipt
      RSEG     *     Invoice Receipt document line item
      BKPF     *     Accounting Document Header
BSEG     *     Accounting Document Segment
PAYR          Payment Medium File
BSIK          Accounting: Secondary Index for Vendors
BSAK          Accounting: Secondary Index for Vendors (Cleared Items)
BSIS          Accounting: Secondary Index for G/L Accounts (Open Items)
Does any one know about it ?
Regards
KY Chuang

Hi Venkatesh,
Thnx a lot for the reply. This has almost solved my problem, however there's one thing left. when I'm trying to take a print out after exporting the info into an excel sheet, the information really looks scattered, i.e., is there a way where we can go ahead and get the info in a rather unscattered manner.
I've tried to take a print directly without actually transferring the info into an excel sheet, then each of the vendor is printed in a separate page, which again they feel is a problem.
So, if you have an idea pls suggest.
Thnx again for the information.
regards
sandhya

FOC item relation with standard item

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for