FOC orders

Hi experts,
How should i treat free of cost items in purchase order. Actually i don't want any change in moving average price of such materials.
Plz guide me,
Thanks & Regards

Let me clarify the situation with two examples:
*Example 1: * If a particular material has moving average price say $20 in material master and suppose its quantity reaches zero. Now when i will receive new quantity of this material (say 50 units), system will change moving average price of this material to zero, that means, when i will consume or use this material i will get zero value of this. Actually this will deteriorate material costing (in CO).
*Example 2: *
Suppose Units of material in store:      20 @ $ 1,250 =      $ 25000
New Purchasing:
Units 100 @ 1,418.00 =      $ 141,800
Units 50 @ 0          (Free Of Cost)
What I want is:
Value (25,000 + 141,800) / Units (20 + 100) =      $ 1390     (New Moving Average Price)
& the stock should be updated to 170 units (including FOC)
But system is calculating as:
Value (25,000 + 141,800) / Units (20 + 100 + 50) =     $ 981

Similar Messages

How to make FOC order net value zero??

HERE IS THE ISSUE,
when I create foc sales order the item net values should be zero as they are free for charge even if its finds condition records at the back end.
Kindly is there any solution for this issue as I want to make the net value zero.
Thank you,
Sam Ahmed

Hi,
In the item category configuration please choose the ''Pricing'' as B : Pricing for free goods (100% discount). This will activate R100 condition type that discounts the price and makes the net value as zero.
Alternatively, you can change the item category in the sales order to TANN (in standard system) that will make the net value as zero.
Regards,
Palani

Report Transfer price of product in FOC order

Hi Gurus,
I need to report from SAP free of charge deliveries in an specific timeframe in kEur. For this purpose Should I need to have a column in our order type ZGFD with the transfer price of product and total sum.
or is there any other transation that I can use?
Kindly comment and thanks!
I need some suggestions on what tables to look for to generate this report
Thanks
Bawa
Edited by: Bawa Bawa on Dec 2, 2008 1:06 PM

Thanks for your replay Venkat.
My scenario is whatever entered if material or quantity Badi functionality need to be called.
If entered material first its should trigger badi then i can enter quanttity its also same badi should trigger . currently its working for as you said .
Regards
Ravinder.s

How to Make Settlement Rule Mandatory in Sales Order(In Acct Assigt Tab)

Hi Gurus,
I have a business requirement. For Free of charge 3rd party orders (yes they have FOC orders delivered by third party) the business wants to ensure that the Settlement rule should be mandatory. They enter cost center & receiver in the settlement rule.
i.e the order should not save till Settlement rule is maintained in the line item in the Acct Assignment tab.
Please let me know how this can be done.
1: Applied my brains on incompletion procedure but does not seems like it can be done there.
2: Is there something in CO where some setting can make it mandatory to enter settlement rule in Sales order?
3: I s there any other way in user-exits or ABAP?
4: Is there any setting in Item category(I could not locate any)?
5: Can this be done via Requirement class.
Please assist to resolve this one.

Dear,
It depends on settings in Requirement Class (OVZG) and Account Assignment Catg (AAC) in OME9
If your AAC is E in Req Class, then your sales order is a CO object.
Requirement Class in IMG can be checked - IMG > Controling > Prod Cost Planning > Cost Obj Controling > Prod Cost By Sales Order > Control of Requirement.
Or any filed any you can Make mandatory through Transaction variant SHD0.

Free of Charge order: COGS (VPRS) is not transferred to CO-PA

Dear SD gurus
I have FOC order and I’d like to transfer its cost to CO-PA.
Initially, only delivery process exist, but I noticed that without
billing, data is not transferred to CO-PA.
So, we added billing process with no accounting doc.
But, condition type VPRS seems to be NOT transferred to CO-PA.
Is there any solution?
Yoshi

Have a look at this document
COGS not posted to costing based CO-PA during Goods Issue - ERP Financials - SCN Wiki
G. Lakshmipathi

Is it possible to create invoice for Free of Charge order

Dear All,
Is it required to create a Billing document for an Free of charge order as far as Indian scenario is concerned.
We are not charging any value to the customer for Free of Charge. Free of Charge order value will be Zero only.
In this case, is it required to abide with invoice while sending the materials to the customer.
Regards,
Mullairaja

Dear Reazuddin,
But in FOC orders value will be zero.
PR00 value will be compensated with R100 condition type.
But Excise condition type will be calculated on Basic price.
When the basic price value, how the system calculates the Excise condition type values.
Could you please clarify?
Regards,
Mullairaja

FOC Items

Hi friends,
We have a scenario,
We imported Assets items are coming on FOC (Free of Cost). The item is updating the inventory but not updating the asset register now we need to update the Asset value in asset register of Rs. 1/-.
Example:- In the PO Three assets line items are there, out of three one item is FOC. For three line items we have provided three Assets codes also. But that FOC line items is not updating in the asset register of Rs. 1/-.
Kindly suggest.
With regards
Sudha

If you want to use A and B as you confirmed, the only thing i can think of is define A and B as different items and maintain costs separately and make Account Alias receipt for B when the supplier sends the parts back. hoping that we use the Same Lot/Serial Number when we are sending the A and receiving the B into INV. Assuming this you can make a custom report for the items shipped on the FOC order and the Qty of B received into INV by the same lot and the difference to be Qty at the supplier.
Now if you have many items like this i.e. A-B, A2-B2, A3-B3 etc then you have to put this relationship somewhere for the report to work. It can be in item category, custom form or Item cross relationship based on which you prefer

Reference of Contract for an FOC document type

Dear all,
I have a scenario where i create a Contract with value, then for that contract if needed i send materials in FOC, so when you check the copy contral we can assign the contrac to FOC sales order document type.
when when i really create the FOC order with reference to Value contract it does not allows, as because the sale document is have reference mandatory option only for Quantity contract to be copied or referenced for a sales order,
so any suggestion for acheiving the same.
Thanks
Sudhir

Closing this thread, No solution yet

Retrigerring the delivery block for sales order after change.

Dear All,
I have a scenario, When we are creating FOC order, automatically Delivery Block is
appeared. After an authorised person releases the order, the Delivery is
made against it.
Now if the order is released and any amendment is made in the order, FOC
order should get back the Delivery Block status automatically.
Thanks,
Ani.

Hello,
I have a scenario, When we are creating FOC order, automatically Delivery Block is
appeared. After an authorised person releases the order, the Delivery is
made against it. Now if the order is released and any amendment is made in the order, FOC
order should get back the Delivery Block status automatically.
The best option of meeting your requirement is using a User exit which would put a Delivery block when the Sales Order details are changes.
USER EXIT --> USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE
Kindly try out this exercise with the help of a ABAPer and close this thread if your query is answered.
Regards,
SARTHAK

Internal Order control in SD documents

Hi All,
Here is the case i come across, would like to have your opinion.
Every year, budget is allocated for promotions. Marketing team is allowed to introduce various schemes within this year, but it should not exceed the assigned budget. Hence created internal orders(KO01) & flown the funds into it(KO21).
Internal order-IO001 = USD 1000
based on promotions intrduced Mtkg dept will either issue FOC or Credit note to the eligible customers.
in case of FOC, system considers Material cost as part of budget
in case of Credit note, Base / selling price is considered as part of budget, end of the year / while issuing FOC / Credit note, if document value exceeds the allocated budget, then system should trigger error message & stop issuing FOC / Credit Note.
( same is available in FI, when issuing Credit note Tx:FB70 against Internal order)
where as same is not happening in FOC order / Credit note against Internal order.
if anyone come across this case, let me know, how it has been resolved either through customization or userexit? But according to me, SAP has given provision for this.

thread is duplicated . will continue with the other thread by closing this thread

How to map promotional items

Hi Experts,
how to map promotional items with sales employee wise.
and what is the difference bet sample and promotional items
Regards,
Amar

I have no idea abt your process, but you can create new order reason as promotional items and assign to FOC order, you can create sales employee as customer and create FOC with customers ( sales employee).

Rebates Payout as Free Goods

Hi All,
I have searched for this topic in the forum but i couldn't get any concrete answers.
I have a scenario where we need to payout rebates to Customers in the form of free goods.
So if customer purchases qty of 100 units in multiple orders in a given time frame he is eligible to receive 10 EA free.
How can we generate a free good order instead of Credit memo while settling rebates?

Hi Ankit
There is no such utility in SAP standard. We also had same requirement in my previous company and for meeting this requirement we developed an ABAP application. We maintained main item and free item material in a condition type and at end of the month that program checked the selling quantity of main item and created FOC order for free good material. This is the way we did and many other clients are following this approach.
Thank$

Exclude free of charge in available stock.

Hi,
Currently in our system, every sales order created decreases the materials quantity available to sell (before delivery is done). On many occasions we have created free of charge sales orders, which a customer is required to collect within a specified period of time. During this time, the stock of the FOC orders can not be used.
The free of charge order type (ZFD) has been defined for this type of orders.
Is there a way to stop free of charged sales orders from consuming stock until collected (delivery/bill is completed).
Any help would be appreciated.
Nicholas

Nicholas,
Am assuming ATP check is active in your system at sales order level. for the FOC, de-activate the TOR(Transfer of requirements) at sales order level and keep in active only at delivery level. You might choose to have different item categories and schedule line categories for FOC and hence can de-activate TOR check at Sales Order level for FOC orders.
check tcode OVZ8.
Or alternatively, you can develop a custom routine in requirements for Transfer of Requirements which filters your FOC orders in tcode OVB8.
Regards,
Raghu.
Edited by: Rags on Oct 3, 2011 3:23 PM

Problem with new pricing procedure - free of cost

i set up a new pricing procedure where i have zsed (special excise duty) and zmws (sales tax) set as manual, it's not valid on some free sample orders. but when i goto create order it does not show up under conditions, even though i've maintained it for that material in vk11. and when i click on condition type in conditions, it doesn't show up in the drop down either (at the order level). if i just type zsed it says zsed cannot be processed manually.
but if i change the pricing procedure and take off the manual check mark, the tax shows up on the same order automatically (from vk11) but i can't delete it there.
suggestions? i need for it to show up or have an option where if it shows up i can delete it. thanks!

fyi,
If you set the "Manual" indicator in pricing procedure against to any condition type, then you can enter this condition type value in particular transaction. ( But for this condition type details, " changes can be made- setting maintain as "D" not possible to process manuall). Same "manual" logic in the pricing procedure will not work.
Because controls in Condition type has priority than anyother.
Now coming to your question,
If I understood it properly,
ZSED is not applicable to every free of cost order, but it may be applicable to other orders ( excl: FOC orders). Expecting ZSED Condition type maintained in both pricing procedures ( FOC sales pricing procedure & non FOC sales procedure).
if you set the " Manual entries has priority"/ tick mark delete check box in ZSED, then it will allow to enter manually/delete the condition type in FOC order as well as non FOC orders too.
Then there could be chance that user may delete/manually enter ZSED in non FOC sales.
better way would be, create new conditiont table by including Sales document type ( assume you created new document type for FOC sales) with other required fields ( eg: customer/material etc..,).
assign this condition table in top of all the accesses in ZSED's access sequence.
Maintain Condition record.
By doing so, Condition record is applicable only to FOC doc type sales- if maintained , else it will search next condition record.
which will not effect the non FOC sales & user cant delete ZSED from non FOC sales.
Hope it helps

Payment term copy control

Dear Gurus
I am testing one scenario in which i need to maintain condition record of condition ABC with payment term. But i dont want to copy payment term in sales order item level. I am wondering where is the configuration of copying payment term from customer master record or condition record.
Currently payment term at header level is coming from customer master record and at item level it is coming from condition record. I want to copy from customer master in both cases and also want to maintain condition record with payment term. I know its strange but I have to do this.
Any suggestions please.

Sorry for late reply.
Thank you all for your valuable suggestions.
Dear MR. Ravi my business scenario is this.
We have some static conditions in our pricing procedure to calculate Sales policy incentives. We have maintained conditioned records with slabs as per sales policy. For example if a customer buys 100 Refrigerator he will get Rs 100 discount per Ref but after clearance of invoice. For this purpose we have create reserves with static conditions. In those conditions we have to maintain payment terms for calculating due date. At month end we have Z application with our logic to post incentives as per sales policy. This Z application checks whether the sale is cording to sales policy and also whether the invoices are cleared or not. If cleared then it posts discounts or FOC order as per sales policy. System started aging the invoice from that payment term which we have maintained in static condition. But aging of invoice will be done on the basis of header condition and item condition which comes from CMR.
Now i hope you understand why we have to maintain condition record for static condition and also don't want it to copy at item level.
I have checked by selecting and deselecting the business item Tick in VOV7 but its not working.
Edited by: moazzamjii on Jun 25, 2011 11:01 AM

FOC orders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for