Fully Close Off Under Delivered Schedule Agreement Line Items

Hi There,
I am supporting a customer who is having an issue with line items on a scheduled agreement, which she has closed off, appearing in MIGO.
Example: I have a scheduled line item of 100 EA. I GR 90 EA but I am happy with this so I want to close off the line.
I go into ME38, select the line item, click the delivery schedule icon, set the scheduled quantity to 90 and click the fixed check flag. I refresh the Schedule Agreement and re-release it.
However when I go into MIGO and do a Goods Receipt for my scheduled agreement, MIGO is still proposing the 10 EA to me.
I have two questions
1) Are the steps I am doing the correct way to close off an under-delivered scheduled line item
2) If 1 is correct, how come the 10 EA is still being proposed and how do I stop this happening?
Many Thanks for any help provided,
Colm

No Answer

Similar Messages

Is there a BAPI that displays Scheduling Agreement line items?

Hi,
If a PO number is passed to BAPI_PO_GETITEMS, all line items are returned.
Is there a BAPI that will do the same thing for a scheduling agreement?
Thx.
Andy

Hi,
try BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL
Regards.
David

Firm Zone and Trade off Zone in Scheduling Agreement

Dear All
Please explain in detailed the concept of Firm Zone and Trade off Zone in Scheduling Agreement, and it's effects in MRP run, i.e. If i take a MRP run for a material whci is having firm zone as 30 days and trade off zone as 60 days then what will be the result of MRP. The Material MRP type is VB
Thanks and Regards
Manoj

Hi,
Firm zone is the time frame in which you cannot change your orders (schedule lines) that you have ordered from a vendor in any way (Date change nor quantity change).
Trade off zone is time frame within which you can make changes to your procurement proposals, these changes are acceptable from vendor's side.
These time frames are agreed with the Vendor and then inserted for each scheduling agreement in 'Additional data'.
For your example if you take firm zone 30 days and trade-off zone 60 days, the check starts from current day on which MRP runs. For exampe current day is 1st Oct, all the procurement proposals with delivery date within 30 days that is till 1st September are firm orders, which MRP will not change in any case (You can find such orders with * in front of them in MD04 list). Beyond 1st september they are in trade off zone, in which MRP can modify them.
MRP types (VB in your case) have no correlation with these zones.
Amit G

Unable to capture field values in Master agreement Line Items

I am trying to get the field values from master agreement line items page. I have written the following code to get the line item details which is working fine to capture part number and quantity->
agreementBean = doc.getRootParentIBean();
lineItemCollection = agreementBean.getLineItems();
collectionsize = lineItemCollection.size();
for(i=0;i<collectionsize;i++){
 collectionbean = lineItemCollection.get(i);
 partNum = ""+collectionbean.getPartNumber() ;
 Quantity = ""+collectionbean.getQuantity();
 throw doc.createApplicationException(null,partNum + " , " + Quantity );
Now, my problem is that I am unable to capture the following field item values in the master agreement > line items page.
1. Price Unit
2. Unit Price
3. Product Category
4. Plant
Please help me to find the values.
Thankx in Advance.
Su
Edited by: subrataindra on Aug 10, 2010 11:11 AM

This will return the name of the plant.
.getExtensionField("PLANT").get().getDisplayName(session);
Check if this returns the product category
collectionbean.getExtensionField("ITEM_CAT").get().getDisplayName();
This will Return the Price
collectionbean.getExtensionField("PRICE").get().getPrice();
(return type :BigDecimal)
This will return the currency
collectionbean.getExtensionField("PRICE").get().getCurrency;
(Return type:String)
Similarly to retrieve other fields for which there are no standard functions, use .getExtensionField("Field ID")
Hope this helps
Regards,
Immanuel

How to make a mass change for incoterms of a scheduling agreement at item level.

Hi SAP Guru,
There are many wrongly assigned incoterms in the scheduling agreement at item level by a user exit which was implemented recently in production. May i know if there is any way that we can revert those changes back to the original incoterms via mass change? I've tried to search over the internet and it seems like there is no posting about this issue before. Please help urgently. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Shawn

You can use the following sample to develop your usecase.
Here, we would show menu items only for the nodes at level 3.
You can also download the entire sample based on POJO at
http://adfsampleapplications.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/TreeSampleApplication.zip
The code is self explanatory.
Let know, if you have any specific questions.
<af:form id="f1">
<af:treeTable value="#{bindings.continents.treeModel}" var="node"
selectionListener="#{bindings.continents.treeModel.makeCurrent}"
rowSelection="single" id="tt1" columnStretching="last">
<f:facet name="nodeStamp">
<af:column id="c1">
<af:outputText value="#{node}" id="ot2"/>
</af:column>
</f:facet>
<f:facet name="pathStamp">
<af:outputText value="#{node}" id="ot1"/>
</f:facet>
*<f:facet name="contextMenu">*
*<af:popup id="p1" contentDelivery="lazyUncached">*
*<af:setPropertyListener from="#{bindings.continents.treeModel.depth}"*
*to="#{pageFlowScope.CurrentDepth}"*
*type="popupFetch"/>*
*<af:menu text="menu 1" id="m2">*
*<af:commandMenuItem text="View Districts" id="cmi1"*
*visible="#{pageFlowScope.CurrentDepth == 2 ? true : false}"/>*
*<af:commandMenuItem text="View Attractions" id="cmi2"*
*visible="#{pageFlowScope.CurrentDepth == 2 ? true : false}"/>*
*</af:menu>*
*</af:popup>*
*</f:facet>*
</af:treeTable>
</af:form>
Thanks,
Navaneeth

Troubles with multiple ESLL-SRVPOS in the same outline agreement line item!

Hi all,
Currently have an issue where the same service master is being used multiple times in a single outline agreement line item (set up with different groups in the service specifications with different rates).
This is causing issues with drawing services into purchase orders.
Eg: In ME57 when creating a PO from a PR, in the include LMLSPF5J /SEARCH_SRVPOS_CONT/ the system is checking if ESLL-KNT_INTROW is empty (which in my case it is, and message SE361 is displayed).
The main thing thats happening is that ESLL_KNT_PACKNO and ESLL_KNT_INTROW, which hold the reference data to the outline agreement in the PO should get filled with the packno and introw from the oa service line but it isnt happening.
I'm thinking of creating a validation so that the same service service number (ESLL-SRVPOS) CANNOT be used in the same outline agreement line item.
Wondering if anyone has had this same issue and what path they went down to resolve it.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
Tim

hi
u cannot do this because different line items cannot be in same cell as they are variable and only one field can be there ata atime in one column while creating field catalog
u can do one thing. corresponding to sales order u can display its line items ion the secondary list and would make more sense also. for this make ur sales order number as HOTPOT on click of which will display its corres line items 
regards
ravish
reward if useful
Message was edited by:
ravish goyal

Master Agreement- Line Item- Plant- Org Unit

Hi ,
Trying to get OrganisalUnit object associated with a plant using below code (Master Agreement-Line Item Tab)
lineItems=doc.getLineItems();
 for(int i=0;i<lineItems.size();i++){
 lineItem=lineItems.get(i);
 material=lineItem.getMaterialObjRef();
 materialHome=IBeanHomeLocator.lookup(session,material);
 materialBean=materialHome.find(material);
 plant=materialBean.getPlantObjRef();
 plantHome=IBeanHomeLocator.lookup(session,plant);
 plantBean=plantHome.find(plant);
 businessUnitCollection=plantBean.getCollectionMetadata("COLLN:3:647").get(plantBean);
 for(int i=0;i<businessUnitCollection.size();i++){
 businessUnitRow=businessUnitCollection.get(i);
businessUnitCollection object size is 1. But the object is null.
Please help!
Goverdhan Totawar

Got response from e-sourcing tech team. getCollectionMetadata can not be used for getting collection table.
Since the ORG Unit is standard object provided by esourcing, if an API method is not exposed we need to log a ticke, and SAP will provide a standard method.

Inbound Delivery For Scheduling Agreement Lines using LSMW

Hi,
We need to create inbound deliveries for scheduling agreements. Our scheduling Agreements are too big with 200 lines. But the vendor used to send only few discrete lines in his ASN. Is it possible to create inbound deliveries for the Scheduling agreement using LSMW? Is there any standard BAPI or IDOC available to handle this in LSMW? Has anyone done this before?
Our requirement is as follows.
1. Create Inbound Delivery for few lines of the Scheduling Agreement
2. The delivery quantity of the inbound delivery will be a partial quantity of the Scheduling Agreement
3. Materials are batch managed and the batch number for each inbound delivery item need to be captured.
4. Vendor's ASN Number and its item number need to be captured at inbound delivery header and item level respectively.
Note: Delivery Schedule of the Scheduling Agreement is not used in the above scenario.
If you have any input, it will be really appreciated.
Regards,
SP0526

Hi,
You can give your scheduling agreement number in the field Purchase Order.
If you want select from the list, you can click on PO tree (just under create inbound delivery). There selet document category as "L". You will get the scheduling agreement list.
Regards,
Prabu

Copying Schedule Agreements lines to different plant

Hello all, I am trying to copy schdule agreement lines from plant 'A' to a new plant 'B' in the same schedule aggreement. I tried using BAPI_AGREEMENT_MAINTAIN but it won't let you change the plant. I also tried using the copy funtion within ME32 but that doesn't let you change the plant either. Is there any way to do this or will I have to code a BDC to do it as if you are doing it manually. This will be very tedious to write and the chnce of error will be high. I was hoping to find a more efficient way to accomplish this.
Thanks, Troy

Thank you Ramakrishna,
I tried entering the data as you specified (below), but it still did not bring the rescheduled dates into the delivery schedule. I tried increasing the days and %, still no change. My rescheduled dates go back to March 07, but the delivery date still says 8/07.
A few questions:
In the Tol. profile under Legnth in workdays, what does this mean if I enter 10. Does it only check the previous 10 days? and what does each period do? Do I need to specify days and %'s in each period?
Tolerance Profile
You specify 10 days as the checking period for JIT schedules, since this corresponds to the release horizon. You enter 5% as upper and lower tolerance limits and choose Overall check.
Regards,
Elizabeth

Microsoft told us to include the iPad's in the true-up as a fully qualified desktop under the Enterprise Agreement?

Hi,
I work at Oil company in the UAE and we wanted to use iPads at work but Microsoft replied with the following & I wanted to verify this from your side:
Weather iPad is owned by the user or the company, it will require proper softwarelicense right to access Microsoft Software in use by your organization. Beloware different usage scenarios and required licenses:
iPadwill be used to access
-       exchangeEmail”: each iPad will require a Windows Server Device CAL, Exchange DeviceCAL, Exchange Enterprise Device CAL*, and Forefront for Exchange CAL*
-       Intranetrunning IIS only: each iPad will require a Windows Server Device CAL
-       Portalrunning SharePoint: each iPad will require a Windows Server Device CAL, SQLDevice CAL, SharePoint Standard Device CAL, SharePoint Enterprise Device CAL,and Forefront for SharePoint CAL*
-       InternalBusiness Applications: Windows Server Device CAL, SQL Device CAL, any other CALused by this application
-       MicrosoftOffice: each iPad will require and Office license except for 1-1 remote access
“Notethat for Exchange Email access, this will apply even if the user will use iPademail client, outlook web access, Outlook via HVD or RDS.
*requiredif this product is in use
As theenterprise agreement doesn’t include individual CAL’s. there are three ways toacquire those licenses:
-       Includethe iPad’s in the true-up as a fully qualified desktop under the EnterpriseAgreement
-       Acquiringthe Enterprise CAL only & SQL CAL for those devices under the EA. We willneed to approve an exception to do that. Please advise me the quantity. Thisscenario will apply only if Office will not be used with the iPad or will beused in 1-1 Remote Access scenario.
-       Signa separate Select agreement to acquire the individual CAL’s with SA.
Regards,

Thank you
I also found the below useful links
http://tonymackelworth.wordpress.com/2011/01/01/the-ipad-on-your-network/
http://tonymackelworth.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/applications-and-os-licensing-re mote-access-and-roaming-use/
"Remoteaccess to applications on a host PC by the Primary User of that device are covered by the volume licenses for Office assigned to the Primary Work device.
This option is where the work PC is running back in the office and theend user is “tunnelling in” from another PC. The later introduced roamingrights allows access to virtualized Office, which is run from a server, versusrunning on the licensed PC that existed prior to roaming use rights"

Link from scheduling agreement line to original demand production order

Hi all,
I'm wondering if there is a definitive link between a scheduling agreement schedule line and the production order that caused MRP to generate the schedule line?
I need to build a report which looks at material availability for a production order and extends to also see if the required JIT/JIS lines are on an inbound delivery (ASN) or not. To do this I need to know which JIT/JIS lines relate to which production order.
Thanks,
Mark.

Hi Mark,
Such a link exists only in MAKE-TO-ORDER and MAKE-TO-PROJECT (individual planning) scenarios.
If this is not your case, pegging is dynamic. You can see a similar report to what you are looking for in standard SAP "order report", which will show you all the supply situation to a ProdOrd (even multi level).

Scheduling agreement & Lines

Dear all,
I am not getting the Excise duties & taxes in Scheduling agreement and Lines, as like PO, If anyone knows please send the solution.

Hi,
Actually in Print Preview I am not getting the tax and excise duties, I have selected the tax codes. If I go MIGO I can see the excise duties but not in Print Preveiw as like Purchase order.
regards,
MD

Schedule agreement lines

Hi,
can anyone pls tell me how to get the opne schedule agreement with out any schedule lines.
Thx

Hi,
Try this
1) Goto VBAP table pass that No. and take OBJNR
2) Pass that value in JEST table
it will show you the Current status
Now you can select your data according to Status
Ex:- Not Equal to completed.
if u want shedule line then pass that no. in VBEP table for Shedule line data .
Salil...
Edited by: salil chavan on Aug 6, 2009 8:34 AM

BAPI_SCHEDULE_MAINTAIN - Scheduling Agreement (Deleting Item Condition)

Dear Friends,
My requirements is change or create the Scheduling Agreement - Schedule Lines (ME32L). I am using BAPI -->
BAPI_SCHEDULE_MAINTAIN
Its updating correctly, but automatically the item condition price details are deleted.
1st time i am facing this issue.
kindly help to rectify this issue. I am waiting for your valuable response.
FYI - this is my code
        t_schedule-item_no    = t_alv_output-it_no.
        t_schedule-sched_line = t_alv_output-sh_no.
        WRITE t_alv_output-de_dt TO t_schedule-delivery_date.
        t_schedule-quantity      = t_alv_output-de_qt.
        t_schedule-stat_date = t_eket_qty-slfdt.
        APPEND t_schedule.
        t_schedulex-item_no       = t_alv_output-it_no.
        t_schedulex-sched_line    = t_alv_output-sh_no.
        t_schedulex-sched_linex   = lv_x.
        t_schedulex-delivery_date = lv_x.
        t_schedulex-stat_date     = lv_x.
        t_schedulex-quantity      = lv_x.
        APPEND t_schedulex.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SCHEDULE_MAINTAIN'
        EXPORTING
          purchasingdocument = t_alv_output_head-po_no
        TABLES
          schedule           = t_schedule
          schedulex          = t_schedulex
          return             = t_return.
I am also tried
BAPI_SAG_CHANGE
. this also updating the Schedule Lines. but deleting the item condition records.
Thanks & Regards,
Durai V

Kindly check notes 1034912 and 1046851
Regards
JP Milton

Scheduling agreement schedule lines

I am facing a peculiar scenario. There are scheduling agreement line items that have multiple GRs on various dates.
It has been observed that in some schedule lines, the GR quantity is greater than the scheduled quantity.
Under what circumstances can this happen?
Any idea will be appreciated.
Regards,
Aroop

>
Paul Herzog wrote:
> Hi.
>
> 1. the target quantity of the scheduling agreement can be exceeded by the quantityin the scheduling lines and then the gr quantity in the gr.
>
> 2. If you maintain tolerances it is possible to receive more than you've actually ordered.
>
> regards, Paul.
Hi Paul,
The target quantity has not been compromised, only the quantity of a particular schedule.
The tolerance is set to 0. Hence, normally it does not allow GR of quantity greater than scheduled till the current date.
Regards,
Aroop

Fully Close Off Under Delivered Schedule Agreement Line Items

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for