FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS OUT OF SAP STANDARD

Hi
I have faced one interview question, That is "What you have developed functionnal aspects out of sap standered"
Please tall me what we have function aspects related to FI-GL,AP,AR and AA
could you give me some example
Regards,
Lingaiah,
Moderator: Please, note that this forum is not used for interview questions

solved

Similar Messages

Find out all SAP Standard Objects which are Modify

Hi
How can i find out all SAP Standard Objects which are Modify?
Regards
Vikram

Hi,
You can find all SAP objects list via t-code SWO2, as to these objects, if you want to change anyone of them, you should apply an access key in advance from http://service.sap.com, otherwise you can not modify any object in SAP system.
Good luck
Z.T

Why most of SAP Standard transactions are written in function pools

Hi Forum Experts,
Why most of SAP Standard transactions are written in function pools instead of a normal module pool program? ( In the case of Standard tcode function pools, it is a collection of a large number of funciton modules, includes for forms used by function modules, and screens. Why is it so? ).
Quick response will be appriciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Harikrishna Indugu.

because these functino pools contains so many function mudules and these function modules are used in other transactions also...
thats why....
reward points if useful....

Where-Used List: Modifying SAP standard function module

Hi,
We have decided to modify SAP standard function module SD_SCHEDULING. But before that, we need to understand what impact this modification will have in the system. We will also estimate the risks with this modification.
Therefore, I have taken Where-Used List for this function module. We are aware that this list is not comprehensive.
Do you know any other way we could use to understand better what impacts this kind of modification may have? My colleagues say that this is the only way.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Jarmo Tuominen

Hi Jarmo,
Try this
1). Goto Se16 and check the contents of table 'CROSS'.
2). Enter 'F' in the first selection screen field
3). In the NAME field enter the Function module SD_SCHEDULING and execute.
4). The list will give you where all the FM has been used.
Kindly note this is almost the same as doing a where used list. The where used list will only work correctly if the 'Update Navigation Index' works correctly in your system. So just to ensure the result of your where used list you can follow the above steps. This does not require the Update Navigation Index.
Hope this helps
Cheers
VJ

To find out how SAP is handling language support in the standard product.

Hi All,
i have one issue like "To find out how SAP is handling language support in the standard product". Any body have the solution, please send me as soon as possible.
i am very thankful to you all in advance.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarjuna.

It would be easier to send a solution if you'd clearly defined the problem!.
SAP is built to be multilingual.
For ABAP development, to ensure that your code is able to be multilingual, you should not hard code any text that the users could see - you should instead use text elements, standard texts, OTR, message classes etc.
matt

Standard man hours out of SAP ...help

i have a standard reports OUT of COPA ..but i am trying to addd standard man hours onto it. i am not able to find anything.
kindly help me if you know any cube or DS which has standard man hours?
here is what i am looking
u201C Modify the operating report to show the standard man hours out of SAP on the operating report instead of the old standards.u201D
help is much apreciated

solved

Lst of all sap standard function modules???

can anyone provide with a list of all sap standard function modules??? I am currently working in Product costing.As per my Functional specification i need to find the number of cost centers in a cost center group.we guess that this information will be available from a function modules.so can anyone provide all the function modules of sap.

Hi,
Check this link :
<a href="http://www.erpgenie.com/abap/functions.htm">http://www.erpgenie.com/abap/functions.htm</a>
-SatyaPriya

SAP Standard Functionality ?

Hello PP members:
In GAP analysis, the clients requirement is "capacity to be checked during MRP run and if sufficient capacity is there then MRP run should not create orders"
But SAP standard functionality MRP run always creates orders irrespective of capacity checking
Is there any work around for this problem, If yes please let me know
Thanks for your time & efforts
Thanks Again,
Suren

Hi Suren,
basically what MRP does it create Planned order that means it is booking hours into m/c, when you do lead time scheduling dates will be thrown to free period where no capacity is booked and if dates not matching it reschedule the planning
Thats wat standard SAP does
Thanks
Bala

Question about SAP standard functionality related to the GL master record.

My question is;
Is this a SAP standard functionality to update the description ( long text or short) of a GL account (in master record) in one company code when we change the description of the same GL account in another company code which is assigned to the same chart of account?
For example we have two company codes and both are assigned to the same chart of account and we are changing long text of one GL account in one CoCd. Should it update the long text of the same GL account in other CoCd assigned to the same chart of account? If so, then is this a standard SAP functionality or there is any setting where we can turn this functionality on or off.
Thanks in advance for help n answer.

Hi
GL accounts control takes place two leval
1.Chart of account leval
2.Comapany code leval
In chart of account leval Type/Description,Keywoard Translation,Information of Chart of Account of account tabs are controlled ,if u made any changes above tabs that should be applicable to all company codes using same chart of accounts.
u r changing the short text,long text these are controlled by char of accounts leval this should be applicalbe to all company codes, u can't maintain company code leval type and description.

Is there any detail description of SAP standard function?

HI
I just curious about wheather any references of SAP standard function exist.
for example. I found 'UMB_VAR_TO_FISCPER' function which is someone's abap code but I can't get any clue what that function use for.
I only can see type description in function source code.
Is there any references of SAP function?
thanks.

Go thru the below link
<a href="http://http://www.sapdevelopment.co.uk/fmodules/fmssap.htm"></a>
You will find Function Modules with description and with example.

Proviiding F4 function for SAP Standard filed.

Hello Gurus ,
Can anyone help me in providing the solution in my issue.
The SAP Standard ID field must be implement F4 fucntionality to search for Business partner.
Any help is greatly appreciated and point will be Rewarded.
Best Regards
Shaik

Hi..
Have you tried enhancing the GET_V method of the std. field ?
try this code:
DATA: ls_map TYPE if_bsp_wd_valuehelp_f4descr=>gtype_param_mapping,
lt_inmap TYPE if_bsp_wd_valuehelp_f4descr=>gtype_param_mapping_tab,
lt_outmap TYPE if_bsp_wd_valuehelp_f4descr=>gtype_param_mapping_tab.
CREATE OBJECT rv_valuehelp_descriptor
TYPE
cl_bsp_wd_valuehelp_f4descr
EXPORTING
iv_help_id = 'class_name'
iv_help_id_kind = if_bsp_wd_valuehelp_f4descr=>help_id_kind_callback
iv_input_mapping = lt_inmap
iv_output_mapping = lt_outmap
iv_trigger_submit = abap_true.
class_name is the class that you need to create which would implement the interface method retrieve_custom_values of interface IF_BSP_WD_CUSTOM_F4_CALLBACK where you write the code for retrieving the F4 help values.This is helpful in providing customized result set.
U can also search for std. value help views/std. search helps for BP in transaction se11 and pass it as param iv_help_id instead of classname .
Hope this may help you...
Thanks...

Do you trust the SAP standard rule set ?

Hello all,
I have the impression that, too often, the SAP standard ruleset has been taken for granted : upload, generate and use. Here is a post as to why not to do so. Hopefuly, this will generate a interesting discussion.
As I have previously stated in other threads, you should be very careful accepting the SAP standard rule set without reviewing it first. Before accepting it, you should ensure that your specific SAP environment has been reflected in the functions. The 2 following questions deal with this topic :
1. what is your SAP release ? ---> 46C is different than ECC 6.0 in terms of permissions to be included in the function permission tab. With every SAP release, new authorization objects are linked to SAP standard tcodes. Subsequently some AUTHORITY-CHECK statements have been adapted in the ABAP behind the transaction code. So, other authorizations need to provided from an implementation point of view (PFCG). And thus, from an audit perspective (GRC-CC), other settings are due when filtering users' access rights in search for who can do what in SAP.
2. what are your customizing settings and master data settings ? --> depending on these answers you will have to (de)activate certain permissions in your functions. Eg. are authorization groups for posting periods, business areas, material types, ... being used ? If this is not required in the SAP system and if activated in SAP GRC function, then you filter down your results too hard, thereby leaving certain users out of the audit report while in reality they can actually execute the corresponding SAP functionality --> risk for false negatives !
Do not forget that the SAP standard ruleset is only an import of SU24 settings of - probably - a Walldorf system. That's the reason SAP states that the delivered rule set is a starting point.
So, the best practice is :
a. collect SAP specific settings per connector in a separate 'questionnaire' document, preferably structured in a database
b. reflect these answers per function per connector per action per permission by correctly (de)activating the corresponding permissions for all affected functions
You can imagine that this is a time-consuming process due to the amount of work and the slow interaction with the Java web-based GRC GUI. Therefore, it is a quite cumbersome and at times error-prone activity ...... That is, in case you would decide to implement your questionnaire answers manually. There are of course software providers on the market that can develop and maintain your functions in an off-line application and generate your rule set so that you can upload it directly in SAP GRC. In this example such software providers are particularly interesting, because your questionnaire answers are structurally stored and reflected in the functions. Any change now or in the future can be mass-reflected in all (hundreds / thousands of) corresponding permissions in the functions. Time-saving and consistent !
Is this questionnaire really necessary ? Can't I just activate all permissions in every function ? Certainly not, because that would - and here is the main problem - filter too much users out of your audit results because the filter is too stringent. This practice would lead too false negatives, something that auditors do not like.
Can't I just update all my functions based on my particular SU24 settings ? (by the way, if you don't know what SU24 settings are, than ask your role administrator. He/she should know. ) Yes, if you think they are on target, yes you can by deleting all VIRSA_CC_FUNCPRM entries from the Rules.txt export of the SAP standard rule set, re-upload, go for every function into change mode so that the new permissions are imported based on your SU24 settings. Also, very cumbersome and with the absolute condition that you SU24 are maintained excellent.
Why is that so important ? Imagine F_BKPF_GSB the auth object to check on auth groups on business areas within accounting documents. Most role administrator will leave this object on Check/Maintain in the SU24 settings. This means that the object will be imported in the role when - for example - FB01 has been added in the menu. But the role administrator inactivates the object in the role. Still no problem, because user doesn't need it, since auth groups on business areas are not being used. However, having this SU24 will result in an activated F_BKPF_GSB permission in your GRC function. So, SAP GRC will filter down on those users who have F_BKPF_GSB, which will lead to false negatives.
Haven't you noticed that SAP has deactivated quite a lot of permissions, including F_BKPF_GSB ? Now, you see why. But they go too far at times and even incorrect. Example : go ahead and look deeper into function AP02. There, you will see for FB01 that two permissions have been activated. F_BKPF_BEK and F_BKPF_KOA. The very basic authorizations needed to be able to post FI document are F_BKPF_BUK and F_BKPF_KOA. That's F_BKPF_BUK .... not F_BKPF_BEK. They have made a mistake here. F_BKPF_BEK is an optional auth object (as with F_BKPF_GSB) to check on vendor account auth groups.
Again, the message is : be very critical when looking at the SAP standard rule set. So, test thoroughly. And if your not sure, leave the job to a specialized firm.
Success !
Sam

Sam and everyone,
Sam brings up some good points on the delivered ruleset. Please keep in mind; however, that SAP has always stated that the delivered ruleset is a starting point. This is brought up in sap note 986996     Best Practice for SAP CC Rules and Risks. I completely agree with him that no company should just use the supplied rules without doing a full evaluation of their risk and control environment.
I'll try to address each area that Sam brings up:
1. Regarding the issue with differences of auth objects between versions, the SAP delivered rulset is not meant to be version specific. We therefore provide rules with the lowest common denominator when it comes to auth object settings.
The rules were created on a 4.6c system, with the exception of transactions that only exist in higher versions.
The underlying assumption is that we want to ensure the rules do not have any false negatives. This means that we purposely activate the fewest auth objects required in order to execute the transaction.
If new or different auth object settings come into play in the higher releases and you feel this results in false positives (conflicts that show that don't really exist), then you can adjust the rules to add these auth objects to the rules.
Again, our assumption is that the delivered ruleset should err on the side of showing too many conflicts which can be further filtered by the customer, versus excluding users that should be reported.
2. For the customizing settings, as per above, we strive to deliver rules that are base level rules that are applicable for everyone. This is why we deliver only the core auth objects in our rules and not all. A example is ME21N.
If you look at SU24 in an ECC6 system, ME21N has 4 auth objects set as check/maintain. However, in the rules we only enable one of the object, M_BEST_BSA. This is to prevent false negatives.
3. Sam is absolutely right that the delivered auth object settings for FB01 have a mistake. The correct auth object should be F_BKPF_BUK and not F_BKPF_BEK. This was a manual error on my part. I've added this to a listing to correct in future versions of the rules.
4. Since late 2006, 4 updates have been made to the rules to correct known issues as well as expand the ruleset as needed. See the sap notes below as well as posting Compliance Calibrator - Q2 2008 Rule Update from July 22.
1083611 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q3 2007
1061380 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q2 2006
1035070 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q1 2007
1173980 Risk Analysis and Remediation Rule Update Q2 2008
5. SAP is constantly working to improve our rulesets as we know there are areas where the rules can be improved. See my earlier post called Request for participants for an Access Control Rule mini-council from January 28, 2008. A rule mini-council is in place and I welcome anyone who is interested in joining to contact me at the information provided in that post.
6. Finally, the document on the BPX location below has a good overview of how companies should review the rules and customize them to their control and risk environment:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/bpx-grc
Under Key Topics - Access Control; choose document below:
    o GRC Access Control - Access Risk Management Guide   (PDF 268 KB)
The access risk management guide helps you set up and implement risk
identification and remediation with GRC Access Control.

SAP Standard Cost Centre reports

Hi,
I would like to use the following SAP Standard report S_ALR_87013614 but cannot exclude certain cost elements.
The report unfortunately only has the functionality to include cost elements but there is no option to exclude any cost elements. The "exclude from selection" option button is greyed out.
Can anyone give me a workable solution to overcome this problem.
Regards
Ropetra van nelson

Hi Ropetra van nelson,
One of the possible soultion is that you can create Cost Element group in KAH1with required cost element. When you are accessing the transaction code S_ALR_87013614 , you can use this group for cost center reporting.I hope this will be useful.
Thanks
Panneer Selvam

Proposal for a sticky thread "Performance of SAP standard"

Hello,
in this form there are many questions about your programs, selects function modules but what about the SAP standard programs, they are not always the best performing things on your system. What do you think about a thread with improvements of SAP standard programs?
Ok, that should be the job of SAP, but sometimes everybody needs a little kick.
So this thread should collect suggestions of improvements of SAP coding. These suggestions should be very precise, so SAP should implement them easily. I'm pretty sure, everybody will find some not optimized code during debugging, learning, ... .
So , lets start with an example
Function module CO_SF_HEADER_GOODS_ISSUE
SELECT SINGLE * FROM caufv WHERE aufnr EQ aufnr.
There is no need for select *, because only the fields
autyp
loekz
objnr
gamng
gmein
rsnum
are needed during the FM.
so lets improve the code
select single aufnr loekz autyp gamng gmein rsnum
from caufv into (wa_caufv-aufnr,
                  wa_caufv-loekz,
                  wa_caufv-autyp,
                  gamng, gmein, rsnum)
With this code we can also kill three moves in the last lines.
MOVE: caufv-gamng TO gamng,
      caufv-gmein TO gmein,
      caufv-rsnum TO rsnum.
That was easy, on my testsystem it is 38% less database-time for the select and a little for the three moves.
What do you think?
Matthias

Not sure I'm on board, I doubt SAP will take suggestions for modifying their code via a forum post, I think it is best to go thru OSS.
Anyway, a little story for ya. We had a program which was sort of like CO41(collective planned order conversion), but was custom because we needed to include characterisics, so we have this program that gets all of the planned orders and then does CO40 transaction over each one. This worked in the begining, but after some time the runtime was extremely bad, like hours long. So I did some investigation and found the exact SELECT statement deep inside of CO40, and found that the WHERE clause was not written in such a way that was good for my company. I contacted OSS, and pointed them to the exact place in the code that was giving us a problem. I told them that the one line in the WHERE clause needed to b commented out, then the performance would be much better. They came back after a number of days, and said, the SELECT statement was written in such a way that it works for all business processes. At my company, our business process dictated that the one line in the WHERE clause was not necessary and even hurting our performance. Anyway, they said they would not issue a change for us and that we either had to hack it ourselves or totally redo the way our task list groups where set up. The problem was is that we had a couple task list groups, with thousands and thousands of materials assign to it. This was the problem. So I hacked the standard program, and it actually shaved of 3 hours of processing time.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

Download all roles Individually and list all the SAP standard roles

Hi ,
I have two questions .
1. I want o download all the roles individually in SAP.
2. I want to list all the SAP standard roles whose profile is generated.
Can anyone help me . to achieve this

Dear,
I am no sure what kind of problem you have faced that requires revert back. Which took 2 days. If it's for mass role revert back then mass role download should work. If it few selective role then change history should help you out.
Anyway I might pull this out of the topic.
Even you download mass role in a single file then also if you want then can upload a single role only with 2-3 mins spending on replace function in notepad!!
Let say you have taken 1000 role in a single file and want to upload a specific role only. Open the file (copy of the file) in a notepad. Now replace(Ctrlh) LOADED_AGRS with nothing. Find(Ctrlf) the role you want to upload. In begining of that line paste LOADED_AGRS
Above file will upload the specific role only.
Regards,
Arpan Paik

FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS OUT OF SAP STANDARD

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for