Block Invoice amount greater than PO amount

Dear Expert,
Currently, I set a tolerance (incoming invoice--> define vendor-specific tolerance) to allow user to post Invoice greater than Amount received (case is PO service for partial receive). However, we want that it will block user to post invoice more then the total value of PO.
Currently, if I set the tolerance limit, then it's possible to post invoice More than PO value as long as the variance is under its tolerance limit.
Any advice?
thanks,
nasikhin

Hi Ajit,
thanks for your reply, could you please tell us which transaction key?? i've tried PP, BD, LA but nothing works.
Moreover, I wonder if the price variance occured because of this tolerance could be posted to the particular Expense/Inventory instead of new GL account for price variance.
Currently, it's posted to the GL account I set up on OBYC for transaction DIF..
And when I lookup to the PO history, the invoice amount is the same with amount received, although the real invoice amount is over.
Any suggestion will be very appreciated.
Thanks,
Nasikhin

Similar Messages

  • F-32 Partial payment amount greater than net amount

    Hi Experts,
    We have recently a problem in clearing up payments in F-32. When we double-click the item under Partial Payment Tab, the warning message displays "Partial payment amount greater than net amount" then the value in the Payment Amount Column becomes negative. The users need to activate 2 separate entries for partial payment but instead of . How can we do this?
    We have to post like this in partial payment under same customer:
    20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     20.08.2009     20.08.2009     5,000.00-     1,295.12
    20110225     1400010330     DZ     19     25.02.2011     25.02.2011     2,000.00-     1,295.12-
    So the the Assigned Value should be zero to post.

    Thanks @Atif. Ok so now I understand that the "Total Difference Posting" amount inf-32 will create the new amount of the residual payment with Document Type AB.
    Now with the Warning Message "Partial Payment Amount greater than the net amount", this is in a overpayment amount that is reflected in transaction F-32, here are the entries:
    Assignment  Doc Num      Doc Type      Post Key    Net Amt         Partially Paid Amt Payment Amt
    2133004220     90005448     RV     01     3,707.02      3,305.71      401.31
    2133015007     90020098     RV     01     7,836.68      6,737.25      1,099.43
    2133016757     90022362     RV     01     10,521.31      8,603.87      1,917.44
    2133137046     90187172     RV     01     11,367.68      0.00      11,367.68
    2133137047     90187173     RV     01     1,354.09      0.00      1,354.09
    2133137048     90187174     RV     01     1,739.82      0.00      1,739.82
    2133137049     90187175     RV     01     994.57      0.00      994.57
    20110419     90187176     RV     01     6.42      0.00      6.42
    20110421     90187177     RV     01     44.94      0.00      44.94
    20110425     90187178     RV     01     19.26      0.00      19.26
    20081216     1400003657     DZ     19     3,421.86-     3,394.04-     27.82-
    20081222     1400003706     DZ     19     1,000.00-     1,033.17-     33.17-
    20090310     1400004396     DZ     19     420.51-     401.25-     19.26-
    20090630     1400005319     DZ     19     786.13-     705.94-     80.19-
    20090702     1400005349     DZ     19     596.04-     535.88-     60.16-
    20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     5,000.00-     6,295.12-     1,295.12-
    20090824     1400005827     DZ     19     308.16-     295.32-     12.84-
    20091027     1400006377     DZ     19     400.72-     375.04-     25.68-
    20091215     1400006796     DZ     19     349.89-     337.05-     12.84-
    20100608     1400008253     DZ     19     200.09-     189.39-     10.70-
    20101019     1400009279     DZ     19     165.85-     155.00-     10.85-
    20101019     1400009280     DZ     19     254.65-     238.00-     16.65-
    20101019     1400009281     DZ     19     160.64-     157.00-     3.64-
    20101130     1400009595     DZ     19     10,000.00-     5,440.92-     4,559.08-
    How is this possible that Document numbers 1400003706 and 1400005790 has overpaid amount. And both of them are downpayment documents? Is there any way I can clear them with the Invoices, I am also lost with this kind of scenario?

  • Payment amount greater than net amount!

    Payment amount greater than net amount! ,  i am receiving this error while doing partial payment.. plz help
    Also reversed documents are not coming in partial payment tab in F-53 but it is showing as a open item in vendor balance.....

    /hi,
    First of all Check ur Clearig GL i.e Bank /Cash in that Relevant to cash Flow is ticked or not.If not ticked then tick it and then try again.
    thanks
    deepa

  • Total Amount of Invoices is greater than the amount out of invoice

    Hey guys,
    One of my clients is using the credit card module to process payments in their system.  This is fine except that often times the paid amount will vary from the A/R Invoice amount because of shipping costs, or whatever else.
    We have the over/under payment system set up properly and it works when reconciling a payment and an invoice at payment entry, but if the two transactions already exist, it appears as though this extra transaction has to be created manually.
    Does anyone have a workaround or other suggestion for this?  This customer is processing literally hundreds of transactions that fit this scenario every day.
    Thanks,
    Kevin

    Kevin,
    Its very clear now.
    The Journal Entry for the Payment on Account - Incoming Payment transaction is created at the time the Payment is received. 
    If you notice how the Over/Under payment works the JE gets be posted at the time of Incoming Payment transaction.  Whereas on Payment on Account transaction, the JE is already created, the link Invoices to Payment step simply updates the Invoice with the Paid Amt and does not create any new JE.
    Therefore, if you have a Payment on Account transaction and it is short paid or over paid you will need to manually reconcile them using Internla reconciliation.
    May be you can call it a Shortcoming but unfortunately this is how the system works.
    You may chose to post this to SAP Support to get their Guidance on a Work around, if not you might have to write a small  AddOn for this.
    Best wishes
    Suda

  • The amount charged to our credit card was greater than the amount on our invoice.

    This last month, our credit card was charged was charged an amount greater than what appeared on our invoice.  Why did this happen, and how can we get a refund of the difference?

    Yes, of course that's what I tried first.  I attempted to use the Contact Support box in the lower right corner of:
    https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/topics/getting-started.html
    And got this:
    We're sorry, but our records indicate you aren't eligible for this support option.
    Experts are always available in our free community forums.
    Hence my post here.
    However, it appears that the URL you provided takes me to a completely different chat application, so perhaps I'll have better luck there.  I'll give it a try.
    Thanks for your help.

  • PLA-AT2 amount 24.12.2009 is greater than available amount

    Dear all,
    I have an issue in Production while doing J1IEX....
    While capturing of Part 2 value in J1IEX, the system gives the following issue..."PLA-AT2 amount 24.12.2009 is greater than available amount"
    Kindly any one give the solution.....
    thanks and regards,
    Mohan.M

    Closed.
    We should not give greater than date of MIGO. We should give MIGO transaction date.

  • Invoice quantity greater than PO quantity (item without GR)

    Dear All,
    I want a restriction in Import PO where system should give error message when Invoice quantity is greater than PO quality ( and GR is not posted).Following setting has been done but still system is issuing any error or warning message.
    1) Set System Message M8 087 as a Error in column online and BatchI in transaction OMRM.
    2) In OMR6 for tolerance key DQ (Exceed amount: quantity variance) set upper limit zero (check limit) in val and %.
    3) In MM-Inventory Management & Phy Invt.u2014Goods Receiptu2014Set tolerance Limit (OMC0)--for B1 and B2 (Order price qty variance (GR) / E and W message Upper limit is set as zero.
    Please guide me where i am going wrong or need any other setting?

    There is no tolerance key which compares the quantity/amount of the purchase order with the quantity/amount of the invoice.
    This is the standard system design.
    In the SAP standard release, the system checks the price and quantity variances on the basis of the default values for the goods
    receipts. As a result, we can post invoices although the amounts and quantities in the invoice items are greater than the amounts and quantities in the corresponding purchase order items.
    If we want the amounts and quantities for the purchase order items to be included in the tolerance check, we can use a customer enhancement (BADI) in the 'MRM_BADI_INVOICE_CHECK' function module to run the check on price and quantity variances based on the amounts and quantities from the purchase order item.

  • Service entry amount is greater than PO amount

    Hi all,
    This is an example of the issue:
    Service PO created with quantity 1 and price 1000.00. PO amount 1000.00
    Service entry entered , quantity 1, amount 1000.00. GR amount 1000.00
    Then PO changed, qty is 1000 and price 1. PO amount 1000.00
    another Service entry is entered, quantity 999, amount 999.00. GR amount 999.00
    After these 2 service entries, the PO quantity is 1000, price 1, PO amount 1000.00 and service entry amount of 1999.00
    The invoices are received and no blocked for payment.
    Any idea of what to do?
    Regards,
    CD

    Hi,
    Message M8 -081( for quantities invoiced greater than goods receipt quantity) is set as E (error) in OMRM & OBMSG t.codes.
    Please check again in your system,1st try in sandbox,then do in DEV client & transport TR and then test in testing client.
    Also try setting error messages for SE-363 & SE-781 in following path:
    SPRO- >Material Management->External Services Management->Define Attributes of System Messages
    After check & setting all, go for fresh  transactions.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • GR Cancellation amount greater than GR?

    Hi Expert,
    May I know in what situation the GR cancellation amount is greater than GR in PO history?
    I am facing a problem that:
    1. Create a PO for 4 pcs of  Material A, 1000 USD total.
    2. IV for the material A, 4 pcs also, 1000 USD. The date of IV was before the GR date.
    3. GR (mvt type 101) material A, for 3 pcs, but is 250 USD.
    4. GR cancellation (mvt type 102) material A for 4 pcs, 1000 USD.
    This confuse me a lot because as I know we cannot maintain the material value in GR for PO, why mvt type 101 will come out a 250 USD?
    I try to create the same senario again but everything is all right now without any setting. The MIGO also doesn't has a field for me to maintain price.
    Any idea?
    Thanks~!

    from where exactly (which transaction, which field) did you pull the data?
    4 pcs with a total of 1000 is just 250 per piece.
    The 250 that you see for the movement, is that the price or the total value for the 3?
    Usually SAP valuates the goods receipt with the invoice price if the  IR was done before the GR, otherwise the GR is valuated with the PO price.
    The reversal is done with the moving average.
    You hide information in this  example, as it is not logical to receive 3 but cancel 4.

  • How to block Invoice when qty of Invoice is greater than PO Qty

    Hi
    We want to block the Invoice when Invoice qty is greater than PO qty.Is there any way to block the invoice ?

    prashant shinde wrote:
    Hi
    >
    > We want to block the Invoice when Invoice qty is greater than PO qty.Is there any way to block the invoice ?
    Hi,
    You can deal with this situation in 2 ways. Manually block the invoice while posting, TAB: Payment.
    Else,
    Use Quantity Variance Key: DQ,DW. You can enter tolerances for Lower and Upper Limit. You can enter absolute and percentage base variance. If one of the limit is exceeded the invoice is blocked for payment.
    If you want certain variance is always blocked, set value or percentage for the upper limit to ZERO and select Check Limit.
    IMG->Material Management->logistics Invoice Verification->Invoice Block->Set Tolerance Limits (Transaction Code: OMR6).
    These setting are for Co. Code level.
    Any deviation from ordered Quantity will be blocked.
    Hope this is what you are looking for!!
    Reetesh
    Edited by: Reetesh on Nov 22, 2011 7:43 AM

  • How to block invoice posting more than the GR quantity

    Dear Experts,
    While trying to do MIRO with more than the PO/GR quantity system is accepting both increase in qty and value with out any tolerance limit.
    How to block, so that system should not allow to do MIRO more than the GR quantity.
    Regards,
    Alok

    Hi,
    System will by default block the payment, when it is not matching with the PO/GR value.
    then you have to go transcation code MRBR - Release Blocked Invoices. so that you can make the payment for these invoices.
    system will give you the message before saving, if you want an error message then go to oba5 tcode and change the message in to error, then if the Amount is not matching with the PO/GR value then the system will through error.
    Regards,
    Padma

  • IV to post with Tax amount more than base amount

    Hi Gurus,
    One of our user want to post Invoice, with Tax amount more than Net value of goods.
    Net amount of goods is 31.45 NZD, where as Tax amount is 99.43NZD.
    Tax code assigned to PO is with 12.5%.
    System is not allowing to post tax amount more than 12.5% of base, as tax code is assigned.
    Kindly let me know, how we can post IV with more tax amount.
    Thanks In advance

    Hello
    I dont know if tax code is assigned for 12.5 then why does he wanat to post more tax. its not correct.
    then also for reason u wnat to post then for posting that invoice go to FTXP and change the tax % in such a way that tax amount will match ur requirement
    may be 316%  so that the sustem while doing invoice willtake thie % and calculate tax
    then again change the tax code % to 12.5
    or
    IN miro only u have a GL tab, i n that GL tab u can add tax gl account and add the tax amount so that it will come what u want .
    if gl tab is not comming then active it in
    spro--mm --logistic invioice ver incoming invoiceActivate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Account
    hope this helps
    Reward accordingly
    Message was edited by:
            Umakant Bhangale

  • A/R Invoice Qty Greater than Delivery Qty

    Hi All,
    Can I post A/R Invoice with the qty greater than the Delivery Qty????
    I came across a case where I have a delivery Document of 10Kgs But Qty changes to 10.5Kgs at the time of A/R Invoice posting.
    Is there any std feature available of we need to do any work around. Pls suggest.
    Cheers,
    Sree.

    Great.......
    Then the way is clear.
    You can manully edit the Qty at AR invoice row level.
    try this in Test DB first whether your effect goes right or not.
    But as per my knowledge it goes perfectly  even if you edit.
    It will increase your stock by 0.5 kg from GRPO stock.......
    Regards,
    Rahul

  • How to prevent invoice enters more than PO amount

    hi,
    how to prevent an Invoice verification being key in the system for more than the PO amount? meaning when invoice has been done for particular PO and there no outstanding amount for this PO. while users try to enter this PO # in the MIRO, system shouldn't allow it to be entered again. maybe promotes with error msg saying that this PO# has being fully performed! etc..
    anyone knows how to do that? thanks

    hi,
    Actiavte duplicate invoice check..
    Make settings at :
    SPRO >> MM >> LIV >> Incoming invoice >> Check for duplicate invoice >> here make the indicators ticked as per your requirement and then,
    Do also tick the duplicate invoice check indicator at VMR...
    and then try...
    System will not allow...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Garnishment deduction amount greater than non exempt amount ??

    Hi all,
    Here is my doubt .
    Say my garnishment deduction is 150$ and the minimum limit(non exempt ) to be deducted is only 100$ ,
    What will happen when I run the payroll for the employee ?
    Will he be errored out and written to the match code ?
    Will the amount be written to DDNT or ARRS table or only 100 $ will be deducted and no error will be displayed.
    Can anyone please tel me what are the possible outcomes ?
    Thanks.

    I got the answer on my own.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Alt Option Key PS CC Using Mouse or Tablet drags app window instead of sampling when using Clone too

    When I open PS CC on my Mac Mini (Mavericks Latest version) or my MBPr (same OS.v) Here are the steps. MacMini and Mac: Open Photoshop Open any image Switch to Pen tool, stamp tool, or any tool that uses Option key as modifer Draw a couple points, sa

  • PSCS2 lockup with 50% CPU usage - never comes back

    Hi, I've been trying to solve this very frustrating problem with no luck so far. When I'm using custom brushes, often Photoshop CS2 will lock up and just churn using about 50% CPU and never unlock.  I have to kill the photoshop process in task manage

  • Displaying an audit through a process chain message

    Does anyone know the best and cleanest practice for writing an audit either via spool or job log within a BW Process chain. I have 2 itabs in which I'm comparing and I need to email the results and specific data rows during a failure to specific user

  • OC4j connection pooling

    We are using OC4J as application server. At this moment we dont have any ejb module in our application. We just have servlets and JSP. How do I use connection pooling for my web application? Satish Juware

  • IWeb 2.0 MacWorld Keynote

    So does this mean that we can't expect any major updates to iWeb?