GATP - Checking Multiple Storage Loations

Hello,
We have a requirement to check for stock at multiple storage locations within a plant.
On order entry, they want to use our default Storage Location (SLOC001), which is the one we ship out of. If there is no stock available there, they want the system to look at the second Storage Location (SLOC002). However, they do not want the Storage Location to flip on the Sales Order from SLOC001 to SLOC002... they want the confirmation to look like it is against SLOC001. This way the Sales Order remains confirmed using the Dates from GATP. Then if the delivery is created and no stock is in SLOC001 but there is stock in SLOC002, we are going to block the delivery for a manual resolution to transfer the stock from SLOC002 to SLOC001.
Basically, they want SLOC001 to include SLOC002 stock.
A few caveats unique to the system:
1. SLOC001 contains the General Available Stock
SLOC002 contains Quality Inspection Stock
2. Stock Type Quality Inspection for General Availability cannot be used because we are also using SAP QM, but not with Material Movements. Basically, an interface with a 3rd party Warehouse Management System creates an Inspection Lot in SAP while another interface from the same system Goods Receipts product into SAP SLOC002 shortly after the Inspection Lot is created. We have looked at the other stock types within SLOC001, but they all seem to have ties into other areas (such as Batch Management).
Is it possible to accomplish this in GATP? Using Rules Based ATP, possibly?
Any help / suggestions / ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Brian

Brian,
I haven't done much with sublocation ATP myself, (in APO a sublocation is the equivalent to an R/3 storage locn) but think standard GATP product check without any mod and without RBA would work.
When you set up your ATP Check controls, make sure you check the 'No sublocation check' indicator. This means that ATP just looks only at the location (In APO, a location is the equiv of an R/3 plant). System will confirm the sales order against available product contained in all storage locations.
Have you tried this?
Rgds,
DB49

Similar Messages

MF60 Multiple Storage Location Check

Hi Friends,
Could someone please tell me if it is possible for the Pull List (MF60) to look at multiple storage locations (say a staging location and a stock room)? If it possible then what config do I need to do?
I would really appreciate your help. Thanks
Regards,
JP

Hi Mahesh,
I have tried that already but I faced the following problems:
1) If there is a storage location assigned to the Material then when I run MF60 it only checks for the Material in the specified storage location even though I might have defined the stock determination strategy and defined the sequence for two storage locations in it.
2) if I dont assign any storage location to the material (in the marerial master, BOM or routing) then when I run MF60 it doesn't come up with anything even though I have defined the stock determination strategy and defined the sequence for two storage locations in it. My production order doesn't show an issue storage location for the components but in this case if I do a order confirmation, then it uses the stock determination strategy to issue the component using the sequence defined
I hope I have explained these problems clearly but please let me know if you need any further information. I really appreciate your help.
Thanks,
JP

Mc.9 Multiple storage location issues

Hi,
I am fetching data from mc.9 in my program but if the use enter multiple storage in selection only 1st value is printed following is code and how will i come to know which material is for which storage location since mc.9 data is not getting stored anywhere
SELECT-OPTIONS : SLOC LIKE S031-LGORT.
SUBMIT RMCB0300 WITH SL_WERKS-LOW = PLNT
                    WITH SL_LGORT IN SLOC
                  WITH SL_MTART = 'HALB' WITH SL_MTART = 'VERP'
                    WITH SL_MTART = 'ROH' WITH SL_MTART = 'FERT'
                    WITH SL_SPMON-LOW = FPERIOD
                    WITH SLV_NO = 'STK'
                    WITH SL_SPMON-HIGH = FPERIOD EXPORTING LIST TO MEMORY AND RETURN.
while append to internal table even if i specify both high and low value it prints low and high incorrectly how will this problem will solved
itab-lgort = sloc-low.
Help required for same.
Thanks
Shruti

Hi Shruti,
I simulated the code given by you and all the storage locations are being populated in the backed.
You can check this by putting a breakpoint at the below code in RMCB0300 and checking the value of sl_lgort[]. You will receive the number of SLOC inputs provided.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN OUTPUT.
FLG_FOUND = FALSE.
PERFORM SPEZIAL_AT_SELECTION_SCREEN_O IN PROGRAM (LIS_PROGNAME)
                                        CHANGING FLG_FOUND
                                        IF FOUND.
This is a data issue and you may not have any records for the selected input.
Regards,
Jovito.
Edited by: dsouzajovito on Dec 29, 2010 5:56 AM

GATP check

H guys,
I am working on GATP check enhancement to consider the storage locaton.
Here, The location ID must be set to the location ID in the substitution rule data to cause the GATP checl to use all the locations in substitution Rule...
How this can be don?
Need ur suggestion on this.kindly reply

Hi Vaibhav,
Let me explain my scenario,
By default the storage location in ECC is not taken into account when GATP uses location substitution to create allocations. Storage location is used to segregate duty paid and non duty paid stock. An enhancement is required to make GATP consider the storage location when performing substitutions.
Standard GATP does not consider the storage location when performing substitutions to create allocations.
So, GATP should be enhanced to consider the storage location when performing substitutions to create allocations.
Hope u r clear with some inoformation now.
Now i need an Enahncement for this.
waitng for your reply.
Thanks
Uday

RBA GATP check is not getting invoked for Sales Order

Hi Everyone,
RBA GATP check is not getting invoked for Sales order.
I maintained the configuration settings for 'Rules-Based Availability Check', APO general settings (check mode, check instruction), carried out integrated rule maintenance, Rule determination for the combination of order type & product, associated the check mode to product master. Also maintained all the settings in ECC towards Req class, Req type, checking control etc.
However, sales order is not invoking RBA Check though it is showing up the 'Rule' icon in the screen. Also, in the APO Availability check in Sales order when I click onto 'check instruction', I get the checking mode that pertains to RBA for business event 'A' (Sales order). Though I have not maintained any stock for the main material for which I have the sales order, yet system is confirming any quantity that I put in.
I would expect that system would propose the same material in an alternate location where we have stock through RBA.
Request you to share ideas on this.
Regards,
Avijit Dutta

Hi Avijit,
You should used No Checking Horizon in Checking instructions and also Check your rule control settings.
What you have defined in 1st and 2nd steps. Check whether product substitution is carried out or Location Substitution.
Thanks,
Bala.

Re: ATP check at storage location level.

Hi All,
NEED urgent help.
I want to know if it is posiible to have ATP check at storage location level only.
I do not want this check to happen at plant level.
Please reply.
Thanks and regards,
Nilesh

Hi Shankar,
Storage location is defaulted in sales order.
Can you tell me if there is any user exit for ATP wherein I can carry out the ATP at storage location level and not at plant level.
Thanks and regards,
Nilesh

Availability Check at Storage Location Level.

Hi All,
Currrently we have the availability check functionality happenin at the plant level. If the stock is available in the plant, then the sales order is getting confirmed. But, the requirement is if the stock is insufficient then system should check all storage locations attached to the plant. Can someone please guide as to how this can be achieved?
Regards,
Raghav

Hi
This is not a standard SAP functionality. Either you have to input the storage location manually in the sales order or to automate this, you have to enhance the functionality using a userexit.
Thanks,
Ravi

Availablity check at storage location level in STO

Hi,
There is an unique requirement from my client with respect to the Availability check at storage location level in STO
Process:
Based on the inputs from APO we are creating STR for moving the material from one plant to another plant. These STR’s will be converted into STO through ME59N batch job. During STO creation process system will do the availability check and only if stock is available in the issuing plant then only STO will be generated.
During this availability check the stock will be considered at plant level and not at storage location level.
Requirement/Scenario:
Issuing plant contains two storage location ( location A & B).FG stock exists in both the locations.
Our requirement is system should create separate line items in the STO based on the availability of the stock in the respective storage locations.
Example
Total required qty: 1000 of material X
material X - Stock in Storage location A : 600
material X - Stock in Storage location B : 400
Two separate line item needs to be created in the STO
Sl no
Material
qty
Issuing storage location
1
X
600
A
2
X
400
B
Is there any function module available for doing Availability check at storage location level so that it can be called in ME59N with the enhancement.
Please suggest how to achieve this. If any enhancements needs to be done we will do it.
Thanks & regards,
Prashanth

Hi Nilesh,
in SAP standard the system is always checking on plant level first and then on the storage location level, there is no possibility to change this behaviour.
I'm also not sure if the process is correct, because if you have also requirements on plant level only then you would create negative ATP if you confirm on storage location level even though there is no ATP on plant level.
I'm also not aware of a user-exit that would suite your requirement, additionally according to the IMG documentation the user-exits in the availability check area should only be carried out in agreement with SAP.
Regards,
Markus

I just upgraded to Yosemite. Now when I try to open Excel, I get a message that there's not enough memory. When I check the storage under "about this Mac" it says I have 150 GB of 249 GB. Help please. Thanks

I just upgraded to Yosemite. Now when I try to open one particular document in Excel, I get a message that there's not enough memory. I can open other documents. The document I can't get to is the spreadsheet of my passwords. Go figure. When I check the storage under "about this Mac" it says I have 150 GB of 249 GB. I have a MacBook Air. Help please. Thanks, Connie

I just upgraded to Yosemite. Now when I try to open one particular document in Excel, I get a message that there's not enough memory. I can open other documents. The document I can't get to is the spreadsheet of my passwords. Go figure. When I check the storage under "about this Mac" it says I have 150 GB of 249 GB. I have a MacBook Air. Help please. Thanks, Connie

Inspected stock posting to multiple storage location without batch

Hi,
At the time of Usage Decision, I want to post the inspected stock to multiple storage location i.e., Rejected Stock to Scrap Storage Location, Qualified Stock to Unrestricted Use Storage Location.
Quick response will be appreciated.
Anandkumar KS

The scrap line has no storage location since that stock is typically written off and scrap cost center is defined in configuration.
A possible alternative is to set up VMENGE08 and VMENGE09 with the same material movements you want to use. You obviously aren't using the 553 movement type as that writes off the material. That could give you two lines to use for your scraping. I can't remember if these stock posting lines give you the storage location option or not and I don't have a sandbox available to test today. If you need to post more then two grades in one inspection lot, you'll have to do the first two postings, save the UD, then come back in and do a second posting for the next two grades.
Read the configuration help file you'll find in confg for "Define Inventory Postings" under the QM config.
You can also change the displayed names of the stock posting lines. That's explained in the config file as well.
Craig

How do I "check" multiple songs at same time?

I'm trying to backup my itunes library to DVD, but itunes will only burn songs from a playlist if the box is checked. I have 900+ songs that are unchecked that I need to backup. I realize I can just re-import them from the original CD, but then I will also have to rate the songs all over again.
A. How do I check multiple songs, or...
B. Is there another way to backup the ratings data for each song?

Highlight all the songs that you want, you could hit command+A to select them all.
Then right click, or control+click and choose "Check Selections"
"D"

I have an iPod 4s and I am trying to update to IOS 6.1.6. I keep trying to download but it will not allow me to click download and install. I have checked my storage and I have more than enough storage space available. Do you guys have any suggestions?

I have an iPod 4s and I am trying to update to IOS 6.1.6. I keep trying to download but it will not allow me to click download and install. I have checked my storage and I have more than enough storage space available. Do you guys have any suggestions?

The only available, signed, iOS, for your iPod, is iOS 7.1. That's why you can't install iOS 6.1.6.

How to check multiple special characters in instr function sql query.

Hi,
The following special characters are comma(,), slash(/), colan(:)
these special characters i need to be check in instr function.
select SUBSTR(master_title,1,INSTR(master_title,',',1,1)-1) from dual;
Can you please write the query with right answer.
Thanks in advance,
Lakshman.

Why multiple post?
How to check multiple special characters in this query.

GATP check on a Material Variant of a configurable material

Hi Experts,
In ECC side material variant is created . with reference to a configurable material of type KMAT.
The same configurable material is also used a pricing reference material for the material variant.
The configurable material is not relevant for production has no MRP tabs created. It is also not relevant for ATP check.
Material variant is of MTS strategy and relevant for ATP check.
Configurable material is not CIF'ed to APO. ECC ATP check was working fine. While doing GATP check , it is showing following error and not doing ATP check.
Product for external product number XXXXXXX and
BSG BSG1 does not exist .
XXXXXX---> is the configurable material.
Do I need to CIF across classes , characteristics and configurable material to APO even if I am doing ATP check on the material variant.

Hi,
No need to CIF across Class and Characteristics.
CIF across the Material ( Guess this material is just one Material). Activate the ATP Model for that material.
You need to maintain "CDP" in the customizing instead of Variant configuration in APO.
This should work.
Regards,

HU in multiple storage location

Can HU resided in multiple storage location?? I'd like to know if it's possible to transfer partial qty of an HU into multiple storage location with the same plant/whse. Here is the scenario:
HU1234 has 100pcs in plant ABC 0001 whse 011 bin aa-001-c
Is the below possible or would I need to have unique HU ids for the other three HUs.
HU1234 25pc in plant plant ABC 0001 whse 011 bin aa-001-c
HU1234 25pc in plant plant ABC 0002 whse 011 bin aa-001-c
HU1234 25pc in plant plant ABC 0003 whse 011 bin aa-001-c
HU1234 25pc in plant plant ABC 0004 whse 011 bin aa-001-c

I also think I need to separte HUs but I just making sure I'm not missing something.
The business scenario is that we want to create a plant w/ mulitple storage location to move inventory in and out for specific key customers "Geo Hub" we are trying to avoid having to handle the HU and limit physical movement until we actually need to ship it out on an Outbound DN.
I know in our current enviroment we can only transfer a full HU via HUMO and if we want to transfer a partial HU we move it to repack and split it.

GATP - Checking Multiple Storage Loations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for