General Account in Transaction MIR7 and MIRO

Hello Gurus,
we are getting crazy about a simple topic. We want to be able in transaction MIR7 and MIRO to change the field G/L (General Account) in the details tab.As of today, this field doesn't allow changes.
Do you know if this is possible or if there is an exit to execute this single change?
Thanks in advanced

Hi Alberto,
The GL account which appears in the details tab is a RECON account. If you want to change this i think you have to go to the vendor master --> accounting information tab where you can see the vendor recon account which appears in the transaction MIRO details tab. You can find more details on changeing the recon account in the follwoing link
Re: Change Reconciliation account - URGENT !!!
Assign points if useful
Regards
Genie

Similar Messages

Is there any userexit for MIR7 and   MIRO transaction?

Hai friends,
       Is there any userexit for MIR7 and MIRO transaction at the time of pressing "save as completed" or "save" button. I want to check the sales certificate and invoice verification for the document number entered in MIR7 and MIRO.
Regards,
safiq
NOTE:useful points will be rewarded.

hi,
these r the exits related to mir7.
Transaction Code - MIR7                     Park Invoice
Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
Enhancement
LMR1M001                                User exits in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M002                                Account grouping for GR/IR account maintenance
LMR1M003                                Number assignment in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M004                                Logistics Invoice Verification: item text for follow-on docs
LMR1M005                                Logistics Inv. Verification: Release Parked Doc. for Posting
LMR1M006                                Logistics Invoice Verification: Process XML Invoice
MRMH0001                                Logistics Invoice Verification: ERS procedure
MRMH0002                                Logistics Invoice Verification: EDI inbound
MRMH0003                                Logistics Invoice Verification: Revaluation/RAP
MRMN0001                                Message output and creation: Logistics Invoice Verification
Business Add-in
INVOICE_UPDATE                          Business Add-In: Logistics Invoice Verification
put a break point in each exit,like break username and test the transaction .

Freezing out the posting date in mir7 and miro

Dear Gurus
We want to freez out the posting date in mir7 and miro? Hoe to do it? Can it be done in MM or FICO ??
Atul

Hello,
In MMPV transaction you can give the period which you want to open.For eg if you want to do miro postings til jan 2010 but not for feb 2010 you can opn til jan 2010 in MMPV transaction

Parked , Completed and Posted Invoices - MIR7 and MIRO

Hi people, i`ve the following issue . My client wants the invoices to be entered by one user ( User A ) in the "Complete for Posting" Status , and then , another user ( User B ) will Post the invoice. I found that the transaction to load an invoice in "Complete" status would be MIR7 , and the transaction to "Post" an invoice would be MIRO . The thing is , i`ve also noticed that if User A saves an invoice with MIR7 in "Complete" status, and he re-opens the invoice with MIR7 transaccion , the button "POST" will appear as an opcion in the main bar. Thats our problem, User A shouldn`t be able to POST an invoice at all, it should only be able to save it as complete or edit a completed invoice already saved. Does anyone knows if there`s a way to remove the POST button from transaction MIR7 ?
Thanks a lot for any tip !

Hi,
have you considered using a worlkflow for that?
Ask for a WF expert´s opinion before proceeding further.
Anyway you can have a look at this thread meanwhile:
Best regards.
Edited by: Pablo Casamayor on Jan 15, 2010 9:29 PM

Transaction MRHR and MIRO - Vendor Invoice

Good morning,
we have completed the upgrade to 4.7 SAP version (from 4.6c) two weeks ago.
To register the vendor invoice for simple Withholding tax in 4.6c we used MRHR,
But in 4.7 this transaction is no longer usable and we are obliged to use MIRO.
The question is : can we use the simple Withholding tax or we must to use the extended one ?
Then, what is necessary to do (in customizing and not) to be able to register the incoming vendor invoices for Withholding tax ?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Best regards.
Massimo

HI Freddy,
Create a PO with material having price indicator as Moving avg price (V). In the PO select a feight condition and enter the freigh amount. Also enter freight vendor if known.
Make sure for the freight condition accruals is ticked and the vendor in GR is 2 under control data 2 in tcode M/06. This enables change in the freight vendor while making GR by opening e new tab called Freight at items level.
Since the material has price indicator V both the price and the freight goes to material accounts only.
Also if the freight amount is not known exactly enter an app value while creating PO. Before making the GRN since u receive the bill from forwarder u will know the freight amount for a particular PO and adjust the PO accordingly and do GRN.
Also if possible advice the material vendor to send a copy of the invoice to the forwarder and the forwarder can send the material and freight bill together to u. Although this change in the business process is difficult discover the ways of achieving it if posssible.
Also if the frieght amount is not known exactly even after u receive goods enter an app close value in PO,do GRN and then create a subsequent debit or credit for the remaining freight amount once u get the exact freight bill. By this way the remaining amount will go to the material if price indicator is V.
Thx
Raja

Invoice Receipt date field in MIR7 and MIRo transcation

HI Friends ,
I need your expertise help.
I could see that there is a field "Invoice Receipt Date( REINDAT)" in RBKP table .
Does this field has any control function i.e. what is the importance of this field?
In our system I could not see this field . What setting is required to make this field as visible .
I tried for the screen variant setting in LIV spro setting but could not get any clue ?
Please help
Thanks
Deva

Hi,
Check OSS Note 609655 - MIRO: Missing invoice document headers.
Per this note;
Symptom
You entered documents with the Transaction 'Add incoming invoice' (MIRO) or 'Park incoming invoice' (MIR7). During the posting, in rare cases it can occur that the header data (Entry in table RBKP) is not generated by the system. These must be generated subsequently.
Reason and Prerequisites
Database problems, SQL error.
Solution
Implement report Z_RECOVER_MM_HEADER mentioned below in your system. The repair is carried out only by SAP.
Regards

Problem Related to MIR7 and MIRO?

Hi All,
I want to hide the amount field in MIRO and MIR7, so that no bone could change the amount while passing it. please tell me from where can I hide the same?

Hi
You can create a screen variant in SHD0 or OLMRLIST where u can hide the amount field
Regards
Sandeep

No zero balance for GR/IR account between Document curr and Group curr

Dear Experts,
       I have problem about balance in GR/IR account while posting GR and MIRO between Document currency and Group currency , there are no zero balance . Pls see step by step below:
1. Company Code ABC have    Company code currency = THB
                                                   Group Currency = USD
2. I created PO with document currency = SGD
               Amount in SGD = 269.78
               Exchange rate =   23.59740 (SGD/THB)
3. Goods Receipt
                Posting date = 13.03.2010
                Exchange rate = 23.59740 (SGD/THB)
FI Doc.
              Document Curr.
                   Dr. Expense   269.78      SGD                                     6,366.11    THB
                          Cr. GR/IR 269.78-   SGD                                     6,366.11-    THB
             Group Curr.
                   Dr. Expense     193.81      USD                                  6,366.11    THB
                          Cr. GR/IR 193.81-     USD                                  6,366.11-    THB
4. Invoice Receive
                Posting date = 01.04.2010
                Exchange rate = 23.70920 (SGD/THB)
FI Doc.
        Document Curr.
                   Dr. GR/IR              269.78    SGD                                  6,366.11     THB
                   DR. Exch diff          0          SGD                                   30.16          THB
                          Cr. Vendor   269.78    SGD                                   6,366.11    THB
          Group Curr.
                   Dr. GR/IR              192.02    USD                                   6,366.11 THB
                   DR. Exch diff          0          USD                                   30.16          THB
                          Cr. Vendor   192.02    USD                                   6,366.11 THB
My question are;
1. Why amount in group currency with GR/IR between GR and MIRO step didn't 0 balance ,no post currency diff?
2. This is an error from standard program or It's relate to configuration via t-code "OB22" or "OBRW" ?
Best Regards.
Edited by: nasalapoa on Jun 16, 2010 4:02 AM
Edited by: nasalapoa on Jun 16, 2010 5:38 AM
Edited by: nasalapoa on Jun 16, 2010 9:00 AM

As per my understanding it could be due to OB22 settings.
refer following SAP notes
335608,191927,
373296

Changing account assignment at invoice receipt (MIRO/MIR7)

Hello gurus,
I have got two questions concerning changing the account assignment of a PO item at invoice receipt.
Example: We have a PO item with account assignment category K and non-valuated goods receipt. Now, after GR, we receive the invoice and want to post it using MIRO.
During this process we notice that the correct account assignment category would have been A. In MIRO we can change all accounting information (apart from the account assignment category). So we delete the assigned G/L account and cost center and enter the correct asset master number in the asset column. Then we post the invoice.
Result is that the invoice is posted to the asset, the vendor and the tax account. So, everything seems to be ok, except that the account assignment category in the invoice document is still K.
Now, my questions:
1. Is it allowed to change the accounting information as described, even if that means that the account assignment category is u201Cwrongu201D afterwards? I.e. is this a standard process?
2. This works fine using MIRO, but when we try it to use MIR7, when posting the invoice there is a cryptic workflow error message (Message no. 00398) stating something like u201CPlaceholder for batch input error text, this message is not output. Please notify system administration u2013 Problem with S.u201C [sic!]
Any ideas on this?
Thanks in advance
Alicia

Hi Praveen,
no, there is no error in MIR7. But the invoice is not posted and the workflow shows the error message given in my original posting.
And the point is that I cannot change the K to A in MIRO or MIR7, but I can change G/L account, cost center, asset etc. So after I change it, I still have account assignment category K, but no G/L account and cost center given. Instead, there is only the asset number.
This looks a bit funny to me and I wondered, if this could lead to any problems, because something like that would not be allowed in the PO.
Cheers
Alicia

Value difference for GR/IR Clearing Account in case of MIGO and MIRO.

Hello Experts,
One of our client has asked me about clarification regarding GR/IR Clearing Account shows different values when MIGO and MIRO posting. Scenario is that,
SEZ
Calculation of import Duty
Input goods
Material Base Value
       2,171,385
Landing Cost
             21,714
For computing Customs landing charges need to be added
BED @
10%
           219,310
Loaded in material cost
CVD, @
12%
           289,489
Credit taken
Customs Education Cess
3%
             15,264
Loaded in material cost
ADDL Duty
4%
           108,686
Credit taken
Customs Duty
           632,749
CVD
12%
           219,310
All duty
4%
           108,686
Cenvat
           327,996
CST
       43,427.70
2214812.7
Hence Material cost in GR/IR should be Rs. 22,14,813
Diff (2219092-2214813= 4279)
Whereas it is taking Rs. 22,19,092
My concern is that GR/IR Clearing Account consider only Material cost and non deductible tax amount i.e. CST which is loaded on material cost but system consider some different values, please check the above calculation. When user post MIRO in that case system automatically konck off GR/IR Clearing Account and post difference amount i.e. RS. 4279 to Inventory Account which is wrong. I dont know how system behaves in such manner.
Please giude me on this issue as soon as possible.
Regards,
Vishal Jadhav

Discussion moved. Please use Internationalization and Unicode for CIN related queries.

Value mismatch in ME23N and MIRO for PO with multiple account assignments

Hello All,
I've a PO for indriect material procurement with no material master and I've a single PO item with Account Assignment Category as "K" (Cost Center) and Net Price as "1,357.91". Account Assignment has been distributed by percentage such that 50% goes to a cost center and the remaining 50% goes to another cost center.
When I do MIRO, the amount comes as "1.357,92". This is because, the actual PO price "1,357.91" is divided by 2 equal half due to multiple account assignment and the individual amount comes to 678.955. And this is rounded off to 678.96 and multiplied by 2 in MIRO and the final amount comes to "1357.92". So as you see, the variance between PO price and MIRO price is 0.01.
How to get rid of this variance? Can something be done to match the PO value and MIRO value the same?
Thanks for your inputs.
Sankar

HI Sankar,
This is a standard behaviour as Currencies with 2 decimals will be getting rounded off. One work around to avoid posting of Small differences in Invoices (DIF accounts) is to maually change the amount in the Account assignment in the Invoice line to match to PO line total.
Regards,
Kathir

I have a problem. When I start to sync music to my iPod touch, you have to enter the password of your account. I downloaded the game from the general account, and do not always know the password. He writes that if I do not login, then the game will be era

I have a problem. When I start to sync music to my iPod touch, you have to enter the password of your account. I downloaded the game from the general account, and do not always know the password. He writes that if I do not login, then the game will be erased. Previously, this was not. When starting to sync music, it did not touch my programs, and now because of this music can not be transferred to iPods. PANIC AT ME! HELP

If they are Tunes purchased music you have to sing into the account that purchased them.
Is this the iTunes library/computer you sync with? You can rally only "sync" with one iTunes library/computer.However, yo can manually manage music and videos among different libraries/computer. See the manual method of:
iTunes 11 for Windows: Set up syncing for iPod, iPhone, or iPad

Difference of balance between Sub Accounting and General Accounting !?

Hi,
i have a difference between the sub and the general accounting, the correct balance is in the general accounting.
When i show the balance of the sub accounting with the Tcode FK10N i find that the difference comes from the last year, there is a balance of 10.000 Euro that is already cleared but it is still apearing in FK10N and in other Tcodes of sub accounting.
Please how can i solve that ?
Regards.

F.07 is the Balance Carry Forward; it copies the suppliers (and customers) balances from one year to the next one (tables LFC1, LFC3, KNC1, KNC3).
You should check that the opening balance of one year is the same as the closing balance of previous year. If it is not true, F.07 should repair the data in the tables.

Transaction type and account doc number

hi,
can any one let me know,
in which screen i can find the transaction type and account document number for a given g/l account?
Edited by: Ranjini cn on Sep 11, 2009 11:11 AM

hi,
you cannot have any transaction you can get this from the table only

How to block amount field and layout field in transaction MIR7

Hi Expert,
Please tell me how to block amount field and layout field in transaction MIR7 for a particular user .
i am trying to block through SHD0 tcode but it is not blocked.please give me the right ans
Thanks In Advance

Hi Rajuka,
I wasn't refering to SHD0 transaction variants. User exists and Customer exists are a very interesting enhancements in ABAP which helps to add custom logic to SAP delievered programs/function modules without actually modifying the original program.
Just to add a little more details to the concept of Custom Exits (Customized user exits), please refer the links below:
[http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/CustomerExits(CMOD)]
[http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=189893877]
[http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/Creatinguserexitsforsubstitutions]
You will find a lot of information about custom exists and its types over the web. Also, your developer might provide you a better insight into this concept and its relevancy to your requirement.
Cheers!
Sandipan
Edited by: Sandipan Choudhury on Dec 10, 2010 8:02 AM

General Account in Transaction MIR7 and MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for