Got error "Enter distribution rule for Asset without a validity limit"

Hi
I need to make AUC settlement to GL account using t.code AIAB. I have maintained the settlement rule but when I click on check button I got message " Enter distribution rule for Asset without a validity limit". The error msg no. KD059.
Thanks in advance.

Please do the
following. , instead of assigning cost center, assign fixed asset(any asset)
Then go back and click on detach then create your normal rule again at the same
line
The rule is that AUC should have at least one settlements rule for fixed asset
even if it not used

Similar Messages

  • Projects Release  - Error: Enter a Distribution Rule for Asset without val

    Hi Experts ,
    While Releasing Projects , we got error :
    Enter a Distribution Rule for Asset without a Validity limit.
    Message No : KD059.
    Diagnosis:
    The settelement Profile used requires you to define a distribution rule for asset . For period 005 , 2009 , however not created a distribution rule for Asset.
    We gave checked Settelement Profile , still we are not clear what settings is causes for this error ,
    Please throw some light on if some one come across ...
    Regards,
    Sujana

    check out OSS note 115618

  • Error-M2O-Settlement rule for assembly order for item...could not be genera

    Hi,
    When I am creating Sales Order (VA01) for M2O, I am able to do the costing and copy the EK02 condition type. I have verified the the incompletion log, it indicates that document is complete.
    But while saving the sales order, the below error message is displaed:
    Settlement rule for assembly order for item 000010 could not be generated. Should the order still be saved?
                    Yes/No
    1. If No is choosen the following error message is displayed
           Error when processing Production order
          Error when processing Production order
          Message no. V1380
          Diagnosis
            A technical error has occurred. On calling up the assembly interface, exception 5 was triggered. The exceptions have the  following meanings:
    1 = External block,  2 = General error,  3 = Insufficient data for the interface,  4 = Order was not found, 5 = Update has been rejected, 6 = Final document number for Production order is not issued.  Procedure: Inform your system administrator.
    2. If Yes is choosen, it is creating Production Order without settlement rule. Able to perform GI & Gr. If I try to enter settelement rule (Settlement receiver SDI - Sales document item) in production order (CO02), the belwo error message is displayed
    "Distribution rule for Sales document item can only be created automatically Message no. KD063"
    We are using the requierement class with below details:
    Reqmts class: ZSO- for M2O
    AAC = E, Valuation = A, Settlement profile =SD1, RAKey = 000004, Assembly type = 3.
    Settlement profile contain:
    Allocation structure, PA structure, Default object type = SDI. Valid receivers: Optional -Sales Order / Prof. seg.
    If I make the Valuation field as blank in Reqmts class, there is no error while creating Sales order. And also Settelemnt rule with sales document item as receiver is successfully creating for the production order. Since the Valuation is blank in requirement class, it is Non valuated Sales order stock. All GIs & GR are non valuated
    The business requirement is it should be valuated sales order stock and the production varinaces has to be settled to Sales order. Then Sales order has to be settled to COPA.
    Need your valuable inputs to meet this requirement.
    Let me know if you need any further details.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    ADI

    Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
    What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

  • Error when posting invoice for Asset purchase order

    Hi,
    we are getting the errore message account determination for asset posting with keys not defined in chart of accounts,when posting an invoice for asset purchase order.
    Can any one see why this error is coming and what will be the solution.
    Nagesh

    Hi Prabhakar,
    Here is the reply,
    we have 10 line items,in which 3 items are freight related and other 7 items are related to goods reciept.
    i am trying to enter invoice for 3 line items at a time with two relevant to goods reciept and other related to non goods receipt(freight related).
    accounting entries generated after the GR are as follows,
    asset under construction account,and GR/IR account.
    Let me know the details is sufficient or not.

  • Can we close Fiscal Year for Assets without posting Depreciation?

    Hi All,
    My client has 11 Company Codes. During the year end activity, I closed the FY of Assets for 10 Co. codes (T.code AJAB) and 1 is pending as depreciation is not posted for some assets yet. The client wants me to close the FY for assets without posting the depreciation.
    Can anyone guide me on following doubts:
    1. Is it possible to Close FY for assets without posting depn?
    2. If YES, then what can be the adverse consequences of it?
    3. If NO, then what is the alternative reply I can give to my client?
    I hope the above info. is sufficient.
    Regards
    Amarendra

    Hi All,
    Finally I got the solution. I had to do some off track adjustment which might not be allowed otherwise. After getting that confirmation from the client that:
    1. They want to post zero values towards Depreciation for the year 2007              &
    2. After closing the year, later on there wont be any adjustments for the closed FY 2007
    When client gave me above confirmation i did following steps:
    1.Note down the Current Depreciation Key of the asset
    2.Change the current depreciation key to u201C0000 - No depreciation and no interestu201D (TC: AS02)
    3.Close the fiscal year 2007 (TC: AJAB)
    4.Change the u201COrdinary Depreciation Startu201D date to 01.04.2008 for ALL the Depreciation Areas of that asset (AS02)
    5. Restore the Depreciation Keys of the assets as per the step 1 (TC: AS02)
    6.Open New Fiscal Year 2009 (TC: AJRW)
    So now the depreciation will be calculated from 01.04.2008 and no values are posted towards depreciation for the year 2007.
    Off course in the normal course of time above solutions are useful.
    Regards,
    Amarendra

  • TRANSFER failed!.Error: Error obtaining distribution information for asset_

    i am getting the following error while running the Asster Tranfer API in R11
    TRANSFER failed!.
    Error: Error obtaining distribution information for asset_id &ASSET_ID.
    I want to transfer the asset location and code is as follows
    l_asset_dist_tbl(1).distribution_id := 2385128;
    l_asset_dist_tbl(1).transaction_units := -1;
    l_asset_dist_tbl(2).transaction_units := 1;
    l_asset_dist_tbl(2).assigned_to := null;
    l_asset_dist_tbl(2).expense_ccid := null;
    Any idea is highly appriciated,

    Below is the code which i used to transfer the asset. Used the same code mentioned in metalink
    declare
    l_return_status varchar2(1);
    l_msg_count number:= 0;
    l_msg_data varchar2(4000);
    l_trans_rec fa_api_types.trans_rec_type;
    l_asset_hdr_rec fa_api_types.asset_hdr_rec_type;
    l_asset_dist_tbl fa_api_types.asset_dist_tbl_type;
    temp_str varchar2(512);
    begin
    --fnd_profile.put('PRINT_DEBUG', 'Y');
    dbms_output.enable(1000000);
    fa_srvr_msg.init_server_message;
    fa_debug_pkg.initialize;
    -- fill in asset information
    l_asset_hdr_rec.asset_id := 2000068;
    l_asset_hdr_rec.book_type_code := 'US ASSET SERIAL';
    -- transaction date must be filled in if performing
    -- prior period transfer
    --l_trans_rec.transaction_date_entered :=to_date('01-JAN-1999 10:54:22','dd-mon-yyyy hh24:mi:ss');
    l_asset_dist_tbl.delete;
    fill in distribution data for existing distribution lines
    affected by this transfer txn. Note: You need to fill in
    only affected distribution lines.
    For source distribution, you must fill in either existing
    distribution id or 2 columns(expense_ccid,location_ccid) or
    3-tuple columns(assigned_to,expense_ccid,and location_ccid)
    depending on the makeup of the particular distribution
    of the asset.
    --l_asset_dist_tbl(1).distribution_id := 108422;
    --l_asset_dist_tbl(1).transaction_units := -1;
    l_asset_dist_tbl(1).transaction_units := -1;
    l_asset_dist_tbl(1).expense_ccid :=108422;
    either above 2 lines or below 4 lines must be provided
    for source distribution:
    l_asset_dist_tbl(1).transaction_units := -2;
    l_asset_dist_tbl(1).assigned_to := 11;
    l_asset_dist_tbl(1).expense_ccid :=15338;
    l_asset_dist_tbl(1).location_ccid := 3; */
    -- fill in dist info for destination distribution
    l_asset_dist_tbl(2).transaction_units := 1;
    --l_asset_dist_tbl(2).assigned_to := NULL;
    l_asset_dist_tbl(2).expense_ccid :=109260;
    --l_asset_dist_tbl(2).location_ccid := 3;
    --l_asset_dist_tbl(3).transaction_units := 1;
    --l_asset_dist_tbl(3).assigned_to := 10;
    --l_asset_dist_tbl(3).expense_ccid := 24281;
    --l_asset_dist_tbl(3).location_ccid := 3;
    l_trans_rec.who_info.last_updated_by := 25728;--FND_GLOBAL.USER_ID;
    l_trans_rec.who_info.last_update_login := 25728; --FND_GLOBAL.LOGIN_ID;
    FA_TRANSFER_PUB.do_transfer(
    p_api_version => 1.0,
    p_init_msg_list => FND_API.G_FALSE,
    p_commit => FND_API.G_FALSE,
    p_validation_level =>FND_API.G_VALID_LEVEL_FULL,
    p_calling_fn => NULL,
    x_return_status => l_return_status,
    x_msg_count => l_msg_count,
    x_msg_data => l_msg_data,
    px_trans_rec => l_trans_rec,
    px_asset_hdr_rec => l_asset_hdr_rec,
    px_asset_dist_tbl => l_asset_dist_tbl);
    if (l_return_status != FND_API.G_RET_STS_SUCCESS) then
    dbms_output.put_line('TRANSFER failed!.');
    l_msg_count := fnd_msg_pub.count_msg;
    if (l_msg_count > 0) then
    temp_str := substr(fnd_msg_pub.get(fnd_msg_pub.G_FIRST,
    fnd_api.G_FALSE),1,512);
    dbms_output.put_line('Error: '||temp_str);
    for I in 1..(l_msg_count -1) loop
    temp_str :=
    substr(fnd_msg_pub.get(fnd_msg_pub.G_NEXT,
    fnd_api.G_FALSE),1,512);
    dbms_output.put_line('Error: '||temp_str);
    end loop;
    end if;
    else
    dbms_output.put_line('TRANSFER completed successfully!');
    dbms_output.put_line('THID = ' ||
    to_char(l_trans_rec.transaction_header_id));
    end if;
    fnd_msg_pub.delete_msg();
    end;
    Thanks

  • FBCJ Error - Enter a vendor for this accounting transaction

    Dear Experts,
    I am trying to enter expenses and I have mentioned Vendor Account No. in the Vendor field using splitting option with combination of Vendor Pay/Rec and All Expenses Business Transaction. But the document is not getting posted and giving the error - "Enter a vendor for this accounting transaction". But if I dont use split option it saves.
    This problem I am facing for the last 2 days only. Can you suggest what could be the reason for this error.
    Thanks,
    Deb

    Dear !!!
    I have done everything as you suggested, but it is still showing the same message. Can you please look in to this again.
    Thanks in advance !!!!
    Deb

  • AIAB Distribution Rule for Settlement Error, "Asset cannot settle to itself"

    Hello Everyone,
    I have a customer who is getting the "asset cannot settle to itself" error when trying to set up a distribution rule to settle the remaining items of a Line Item Managed AUC to multiple Assets.  The Asset numbers and AUC number do NOT match.  Here are the steps that have been followed.
    Created an Internal Order, #2000####. (1998)
    Created the AuC asset. #600####(2011)
    Created Settlement Rule (Sender – Internal Order, Receiver - AUC) (2011
    Settle Internal Order to AUC.
    Create Assets. (2014). #900###1 - #900##99 etc.
    Create Settlement Rule (Sender – AUC, Receiver – Multiple Assets)  This is where my customer gets the error. 
    They were able to settle other items from this AuC to Assets last October.  It seems very strange to me that the Internal Order was created in 1998 and the AUC was created in 2011 but as I said, this was working at least last October and possibly in March of this year. 
    Thanks for you help.
    Rick 

    Hello Stacy, 
     Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner but I just had a major implementation go live on the 2nd so I've been rather busy.  I opened a ticket with SAP on this and this is what was found.   
    Joachim from SAP Support explained that the AUC had been settled to itself last year, that is the posting the program was throwing the error on.  My assumption is that we were able to settle AUC's to themselves prior to our March upgrade.  This explains the problem and we have a resolution.  We are transferring AUCs that this has happened with to a new AUC and then settling the new AUC as usual.  
    I believe SAP fixed a bug that had previously allowed AUC's to settle to themselves in one of the updates but because this AUC had a record from the past where it settled to itself the program was validating old line items and that is why it throws the error.   
    Ramnik's suggestion was another option but we didn't want to change the message to a warning because we didn't want anyone to settle an asset to itself.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Rick

  • Delete Distribution Rules For AUC

    Hi,
    I am wroking on one problem address to me. User haas created 999 distribution rule group for AUC settlement...and getting error message KD803.... Maximum distribution rule group reached.(T code AIAB).. we have implemented note 720619 and 483600 to delete unused distribution rule group.... but I am still not able to delete the same....as I found in programme (Z_SAP_SRULE_DEl_DISTR_GROUPS) it is not supporting assets rule group....
    can you please suggest some other way how to delete Dist. rule group.....
    Regards,

    Hello
    If any un used rules are there then only the said programme deleted the rule, if 999 rules are used then it is better to look for other options   like transfer the values to another Internal order
    Thanks
    Kameshwar Rao

  • Entering a PO for Asset and Accrual accounts

    Hi,
    We need to enter purchase order for an Asset & Accrual accounts which do not belong to either a cost center, nor a
    work order.We are now entering these invoices without going thru the PO System.
    Any suggestions on this issue would be helpful.
    Thanks

    For accruals, you make an accrual entry which would Debit expense / Credit Liability,
    and then the following month that entry will reverse. These are usually set up as automatic reversing entries. Then
    when the AP invoice is processed, it will be coded to the expense account which is a Debit to Expense and Credit to
    Vendor, but since there will be an accrual reversal posted in the same account they will offset and if equal, net out to
    zero, if the amounts differ, then that difference hits the P/L at that point. It is clean and efficient. You don't have to
    review the accrual account to match up payments against accruals, etc.
    We cannot directly post to the Fixed Assets Balance Sheet Accounts. The PO would need to be
    coded directly to an Asset number, or to an internal order that would settled to the Fixed Asset system. The best
    practice SAP offers for capital expenditures is to use internal order for all purchases. The amounts post to the order,
    and are then settled to the balance sheet sytematically. This give you better reporting capabilites on your capital
    expenditures, and also makes the process run more efficiently.
    This is what I found in one of the other forums.

  • Itu00B4s possible to change the Distribution rules for a order type RM01 ??

    Hi Experts:
    I need to change the settlement rule which is automatic created at the moment  that you create a Cost colector (class order RM01) transaction KKF6N..
    but when I go into KKF6N transaction and I select the "change" option and after that I go into settlement rule screen, I can´t change the distribution rule.
    I would need to change the settlement type from "PER" value to "TOT" value.. It´is possible in this kind of Cost colectors??
    Thanks and regards!
    Manuel

    Hi,
       Please note that you will not be able to change manually the settlement rule for a cost collector. 
    When you save, the system creates a settlement rule for the product cost collector.
    The settlement rule for the product cost collector always specifies the distribution rule "100% to material" and the settlement type  is always PER (periodic).
    Also refer the note 388457 in which one of the paragraph it says "As of Release 4.5, a special settlement rule is generated when you create a product cost collector (with procedure 5: delivery value for product cost collector). You cannot subsequently change this settlement rule".
    regards
    Waman

  • Error  Enter a value for field BP_GUID

    I am using MDG  7.0
    When I create a  Request for "Create ERP Customer",
    I then enter data including the sales Area Data and Company Code data
    Then Submit
    at the following approval step , Sales Area data and CC data is missing.
    I get ERROR message  "Enter a value for Field BP_GUID"
    Please advise what Table or T-code am I missing values for .
    Thanks for your assistance,

    hi,
    See the attached screen shot.
    Regards,
    Tushar

  • Error while creating PO for Asset is investment measure

    Hi All,
    I am getting error when I try to create PO for Asset which is investment measure.
    Error is as below:-
    Asset is investment measure, transaction type not allowed
    Message no. AK005
    Diagnosis
    Asset 305000003 0 that is to be posted is an investment measure. You are not allowed to post transactions that affect acquisition value using the current transaction.
    Procedure
    Check the asset and transaction type 120.
    I am using account assigment catergory 'A' in PO. I have checked Allowed transaction type for Acquisition and 120 is already allowed.
    Please guide.

    Hi,
    Try to create PO with account assignment category as P/N for project related ones.
    If the related asset is related to Investment Measure we need to settle transactions to WBS element and from WBS element to AUC. We cannot directly post to AUC.
    Thanks and Regards,
    padmaja

  • Got error with newfs command for disk on a Storagetek ST2540.

    Hi,
    It's the first time that use forum and I have pour english language.
    I have Solaris 9 on Sunfire V480 with Qlogic HBA qla2340 connected to SAN ST2540.
    I have 3 LUNs on virtual disk on ST2540 (2 X 2TB and 1 about 730 GB).
    I can create a UFS file system on one of those 3 LUNs.
    A UFS file sytem of 2 TB.
    I got error on ohters like this.
    newfs /dev/rdsk/c6t3d2s0
    newfs: construct a new file system /dev/rdsk/c6t3d2s0: (y/n)? y
    Warning: 2128 sector(s) in last cylinder unallocated
    /dev/rdsk/c6t3d2s0: 4095981488 sectors in 666664 cylinders of 48 tracks, 128 sectors
    1999991.0MB in 4662 cyl groups (143 c/g, 429.00MB/g, 448 i/g)
    super-block backups (for fsck -F ufs -o b=#) at:
    32, 878752, 1757472, 2636192, 3514912, 4393632, 5272352, 6151072, 7029792,
    7908512,
    Initializing cylinder groups:
    ...........................write error on sector 1182585152: I/O error
    Log message in /var/adm/messages
    scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci@8,600000/QLGC,qla@1/sd@3,2 (sd99):
    SCSI transport failed: reason 'aborted': retrying command
    I don't know which trace look for.
    It is somebody has a idea?

    try the -T param for newfs. beware that you need a later edition of solaris 9.. 08/03 or so...
    Edited by: sid_sanders on Sep 12, 2008 2:47 PM

  • Distribution rules for Settlement Profile

    Hi
    I have setup a PM Orders which collect all the maintenance and running cost of vehicles (equipments).  I have assigned settlement Profile "Internal Order" with settlement rule "Mandatory for release".
    Now when I click settlement rule button in work order, there are two distribution rules PER and FUL both 100% and to same cost centre (which belongs to equipment).
    Is this normal to have two distribution rules? will it cause any issues? where can I go to setup distribution rule to just one e.g FUL 100 (just one line), if I have to.
    Thanks in Advance.

    hi..
    1. This is SAto creat two dis rule by default.
    2. This will not creat any problem in settlement.
    Basic concept is :
         A)  Maintenance Order settlement rule having 2 lines that is Per & Ful. Peroidic Settlement- in this settlement rule system settle whatever cost occurs upto today & suppose in future if you want to charge some more cost on the same Maint. Order then system will accept it. And when ful or Final settlement runs the rest of the cost will settle to the cost receiver.
         B) You need not to delete any line whether this is PER or FUL.Its depends upon the settlement job which is done manually or schedule batch job. Suppose you has created schedule batch job for PER and FUL both. And the schedule frequency of PER is weekly and schedule frequency of FUL is monthly.
    I think this will give you some light on this issue.
    kkumar

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to open the HFM web server link

    I am gettng the following error while connecting to the url "http://<servername>/hfm/home/LaunchPage.asp" Error Number:1 Error Description:Please Relogin. Session has Timed out Error Source: Page On which Error Occurred: I have tried setting the Full

  • Data Migration of Excise Duty payables at initial upload

    Hi! Can any one tell me, how to upload initial Excise Duty payable in data migration procedure. for example if different excise duty payables like ED, CESS, SEC.CESS for normal goods and capital goods. thanks in advances. regs, ramesh b

  • How can I get Media Packge

    I'm writing an application to play MP3, But when I import javax.media.* I has an exception: D\cuong2012\btJava\MP3\JPlay\JavaPlayer.java:16: package javax.media does not exist. How can I gat javax.media. package??? I using window 2000, JDK1.5.0_01...

  • JVM Clustering

    if JVM Clustering is possible ! Then How ? Thanks&Regards vipin

  • BlazeDS FlashDevelop RPC ArrayList

    Hi,<br /><br />I've managed to get RPC working with BlazeDS and FlashDevelop using pure actionscript 3 & rpc.swc.  Great, I can return strings & booleans from the my java objects.<br /><br />I've tried some tutes and the BlazeDS developers guide to t