GR IR amount mismatch

Hi Guys,
Therer is a mismatch in the GR and IR amount. The quantities are the same. However, the system is not clearing when i run F.13.
All the criteria maintained in OB74 are matching. Still the system does not clear? How can this be achieved .
Thanks,
Kris.

Hi ,
The issue is that on the GR/IR account there is an amount of XX during MIGO and during MIRO on the same GR/IR there is an amount of YY.
Hence both the amounts on the GR/IR is not the same. We would like to clear this GR and IR.
That is the issue.
Thanks
Kris..

Similar Messages

  • F.01 & FBL3N amounts mismatched at Company Code Level

    Hello Gurus,
            At Client side, we are facing problem of mismatch in FBL3N & F.01 Report for some GL accounts and this is at Company Code level not Profit Center or Segment Level.
            I have also verified the Master Data of GLs which are having problem but these accounts master data are same as that of GL accounts having tallied amount in both reports, I have already check on all the posts as this is frequently asked Question but all the replies for those are not given proper solutions.
    Please suggest me for this Error.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rajdeep.

    Dear Randeep,
    If you are on profit center accounting ECC 6.0. Then Fbl3n cannot be matched with F.01( which runs on profit enter level).
    you need to match F.01 with FAGLL0(Zero)3. provide profit center in dynamic selection and give open item as on as per the period you have provided in F.01.
    This will certainly match.
    kindly provide points, This would solve your issue.
    Ashok kumar

  • Depreciation Run - Amounts mismatch

    Experts,
    I just ran the depreciation run for all the assets in a Co Cd, which created a document. The document currency, Local Currency and Group Currency for this Co Cd is all USD - However, when I checked the document posted by depreciation run, the Group Currency amounts are different from the LC and DC/FC amounts.
    I checked the OB22 setting and it looks ok - The Exchange rate used is same for determining LC and GC.
    Can someone let me know how this can be corrected ?
    All answers/thoughts/inputs/views will be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
    Thanks,
    Nandita
    PS - We recently upgraded to ECC 6.0 (technical upgrade) from 4.6B

    Hi Nandita,
    the mismatch amount will get because of " % change or depreciation key change for asset".
    so u have to run AFAR ( recalculate depreciation). for diff amount.
    Regards,
    R.N.Reddy

  • FI & PA document amount mismatch

    Hello All,
    I am getting different amounts piosted in FI & the relevent PA document. there is goods return transaction for one customer.
    Amount is posted in Co code currency in FI & when I am going to the PA document through KE24 transaction code I am getting different amount but in same company code currency. All the other inputs are same is quantity rate etc.
    can any one came across this situation?
    Can any one tell me why this is happening only in case on this credit memo.
    Regards,
    Prashant

    Hi Prasanth
    In your case the Sales Returns GL account is not assigned to the PA Transfer Structure.
    Here you need to assign the sales return Gl Account [Cost Element} to the source structure which is done in the configuration settings done for Profitability Analysis.
    In profitability Analysis under flow of actual values followed by direct postings from FI/MM under which you need to maintain the PA Transfer Structure.
    Regards
    Murali Kanth Natti

  • Depreciation Run - Amounts mismatch in Doc

    Experts,
    I just ran the depreciation run for all the assets in a Co Cd, which created a document. The document currency, Local Currency and Group Currency for this Co Cd is all USD - However, when I checked the document posted by depreciation run, the Group Currency amounts are different from the LC and DC/FC amounts.
    I checked the OB22 setting and it looks ok - The Exchange rate used is same for determining LC and GC.
    Can someone let me know how this can be corrected ?
    All answers/thoughts/inputs/views will be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
    Thanks,
    Nandita
    PS - We recently upgraded to ECC 6.0 (technical upgrade) from 4.6B

    Can u plz provide the ob22 company code settings.

  • Query on DFKKOP - cases of amount mismatch in BETRW and PSWBT

    HI,
    First I have query that is there a possibility that in DFKKOP - BETRW and DFKKOP - PSWBT can be different.
    If yes, what could be the scenarios?
    More importantly, I want to write query in SQVI to find such cases where DFKKOP- BETRW and DFKKOP - PSWBT are different.
    Can I write below query or I have to developed separately as ABAP report?
    Regards,
    Paresh

    Hi,
      Yes, that is certainly possible. We have many cases in our Prod system where PSWBT is zero and BETRW is not.
    I'm not sure what the scenario is.
    I don't believe you can write such a query in SQVI, as you can't join a table onto itself. But maybe there's another way?
    cheers
    Paul

  • Issue while retrieving data from BAPI

    Problem:
    The initial exception that caused the request to fail, was:
    com.sap.dictionary.runtime.DdException: Wrong amount type (not decimal): Unit service cannot be instantiated
    at com.sap.dictionary.runtime.DdBroker.getUnitService(DdBroker.java:215)
    at com.sap.dictionary.runtime.DdBroker.getUnitService(DdBroker.java:233)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.services.datatypes.core.DataTypeBroker.getUnitService(DataTypeBroker.java:337)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.DataAttributeInfo.initReferenceAttribute(DataAttributeInfo.java:342)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.NodeInfo.initStructureType(NodeInfo.java:708)
    ... 30 more
    I have a BAPI  - ZPM_CREATE_ORDER. I am trying to write a record to that BAPI. Did the Model Import from R/3[including the Commit ].
    The structures of BAPI are like this:
    Zpm_create_Order_Input
            Order         -  Zpm_Hdr
         Operations    -  [ Line Items structure ]
    I have created the mapping between Model & Custom Controller with Order & Operations. Did the mapping between the Custom Controller & the View Controller. Binded them to the UI elements from View Controller with an input form.
    But there are ABAP - decimal fields under Operations -  price & Amount  which are a Currency field and Quantity . So when I just try to run the application, I get the amount mismatch error. When I say run, I could n’t even see the GUI even. I get the 500 error with the above problem.
    I read in the forums that I need to declare as a Simple type and re cast the fields to right type and bind that structure back. How ever, I could n’t get the complete understanding of it.
    For a Retrieval Bapi with the exact same structure, the same issue if I map the Operations. How ever, if I skip the Operations and just map the Order i.e., header, then I could retrieve the records.
    Interestingly even if I just map a String(char) field under Operations structure I am getting teh same error.
    Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance...

    Satyajit,
    You are right. One of the fields needed is Waers(currency) which I have mapped from the Model to Custom Controller. I think, that is one of the causes but there are other fields too (for instance, Decimal type).
    The surprising thing to me is that, even if I just map the character fields in that structure and not map the Decimal or Currency fields, then also I am getting the same error.
    Thanks for the Reply...
    --Vivek

  • Payroll Reversal

    Hi,
    We are facing problem when we try to reverse the payroll (that has been posted and all third party payments done).
    The error message that we are getting while reversing the payroll is 'Amount mismatch'
    Any help on this will be useful.
    Thanks,
    Sriram

    First thing you should tell your business team is the that reversal should be performed only if the Check is not cashed or DD is not made in EE's account. It is simple as that.
    even if you delete the result or rerun the payroll it is not going to help!!!
    check your payroll results from Sep to Dec and find out when the reversed check's net was paid again to the employee? (for example if it happened in Nov pay, the EE would have almost double net in his DD)
    Then tell the employee that he got paid double for Sept - once in Sept and then again in Nov.
    Now that the company will recover that money from his next pay as Advance Recovery! (Let us assume that the 2nd net was paid as Salary advance. The Gross is accounted only once and Gross will be reported only once in W2. )
    You can either enter as a deduction via IT15 with one of you existing wagetype if the employee  has  enough pay next month
    (if you dont have a wagetype then create a new one call Pay Advance recovery)
    or
    Recovery in 3 installments if employee does not have enough pay. So enter wagetype in IT15 for 3 different pay periods.

  • Trail balance with legacy balances problem

    Hi Experts,
    Need yours input for me on trail balance amounts mismatch with Legacy system.
    My client using the both systems legacy and sap.
    Now client taking the reports from legacy for the legal submissions for this year08-09.
    I have done matching each GL with Legacy GL. Some of them were talied and rest of not talied.
    this includes recon a/c also.
    for the expenses accounts i can make JV postings, but the problem is how to make postings
    to the recon accounts.(customers, vendors etc)
    we are here having a huge transactions and client doesnt want to dig out all each and every.
    client wants to make the JVs differed figure for account heads instead of dig all.
    please let me know the easy way or t.codes to adjust the figures in various accounts for trail balance.
    Regards,
    Soma

    Hi,
    My sincere advise is not just to go by an easy way..
    Understand where there is a gap and why there is a gap, vendor wise for AP and customer wise in AR..
    Then try posting the difference amounts into these accounts as you have done in the first case..
    This is a little time consuming job but thats the best way. Dont just post the differences as tommorow reconciliation would be a problem.
    Cheers
    Redoxcube

  • Can an off-cycle payroll result deleted without deleting current result?

    Hi all,
    I want to delete an off-cycle result dated 06.10.2008 without deleting current payroll result.
    Is it possible? if yes, what is the tcode or report for this?
    To elaborate the need to delete,
    Bonus has been paid on 29.09.2008 with correct amount. Due to some reason this record has been over written to 06.10.2008. That's why system is deducting bonus amount paid as per 29.09.2008 from gross salary in the form of /552 - Stat. Net Subsequent adjustment. October payroll has been run and exited. we have found that in many cases, bonus amount has been recovered and net amount mismatches with gross-deduction in the payslip.
    We think, if we can delete off-cycle payroll result on 06.10.2008 and correct IT267 as per 29.09.2008, then system will paid back in the November pay run.
    Please suggest what is the best way to tackle this scenario?
    Suitable answers will be rewarded.
    Thanks
    rajesh

    Hi,
    This is impossible to delete.
    What I understand is the IT0267 record is being overwritten after the Bonus run is exited. Right?
    If is it so then have U able to found out How?If U have found out then share this so that a proper solution can be suggested.
    Anyways revert the over writing by putting all the bonus amout back to 29th and delete 06th ones and run the payroll for next month..System will again adjust the things in a retro run.
    ~BiSu

  • Linking of url in MIRO BAPI

    Dear MM/Bapi Experts,
    We are trying to book Miro transaction through BAPI
    "BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE" we are facing these issues.
    1. Our outside party vendor is scaning Invoice for us and sending the details to book invoice aloong with URL where actual phisical invoiced got store.When we are doing MIRO
    transaction we can go to Note Tab and there we can give the URL link which we can see in the Docuement,but when we are doing Miro through BAPI the same is not able to put in note tab as the field is not there in BAPI.Please tell how to put the URL in MIRO Document in case of Bapi so taht user can go and click to link and can get access to actual Invoice.
    2.We want to park the Docuement if  incoming amount coming through external system is not matching to DMBTR of EKPO, i mean if i am booikng the Invoice through MIRO then i cna very well park it also so i just wana know if after executing this bapi if transaction is not getting posted due to Amount mismatch then how to park the same throught BAPI.there is bapi to park the document also but the same we come to know after the executing this bapi that amount is not matching.
    Please reply ASAP and thanks for help in adavance

    Hi ruchi,
       i know that when recording is not happening for some fields ,but OUR  functional consultant dont know about BAPI CONCEPT, thay i will stick why possable is not from BDC so i need valid answer to tell.... like MIRO IS ENJOYABLE tcode some whar like that....Please POVIDE me valid answer so that my  putted effort will go not off.
    regards ,
    santosh
    Edited by: santosh jajur on Aug 27, 2009 12:44 PM
    Edited by: santosh jajur on Aug 27, 2009 12:46 PM

  • Best practice - ap invoice adjustments

    Hi
    Can anyone let me know whats the best practice to do ap invoice adjustments?
    We have couple of invoices with amounts mismatches to emcumbered funds. we need to adjust the invoice amounts to be able to validate and account the invoices.
    which is a better option (invoice is not yet validated and accounted):
    1. void the invoice and create a new one?
    2. reverse lines and make adjustments in the new lines?
    Appreciate if someone let me know which is a better option and why?
    Thanks
    Ravi

    Ranjan,
    As a SAP customer we use invoice entry in ERP using MIRO and FB60 as these are the most efficient for our busines.
    1. Invoice entry using MIRO tcode is faster as it can be done with minimal use of the mouse.  Invoice entry is slower in SRM as browser response and interactions with the backed ERP system slows the systems reponse to the user input.  Repeated use of a mouse in the SRM browser is detrimental to fast input.
    2. Not all types of invoices can be handled in SRM e.g. Invoice without PO.
    3. We process approx 20,000 invoices per month with multiple input operators, SRM could not handle that sort of load.
    4. SRM is really a procurement application and although invoice entry is included it is probably more for users who wish to use SRM in a stand alone scenario.  We use extended classic so all our financial transactions take place in the ERP backend.
    Your choice also depends upon the number and quality of the invoices you plan to process, and the need for the operators to be trained on one or two systems.
    Hope these personal observations assist with your decision
    Regards
    Allen

  • Mutating Table values

    I am facing problem when i have to insert more than 2 records to a certain table where in 1 record i have suppose RS 10 debit amount, against that i enetered 2 records thro' form ,i have to write trigger which will fire is the credit amounts which r to be entered against that debit amount should matched..but when i can't make group by in trigger since i required some values which r to be supplied to cursor..& it will possible only if i write for each row..but for each row i will not be able to group by .. the code is
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER FAS.&TRIGGER_NAME
    BEFORE INSERT
    ON &TABLE_NAME
    REFERENCING NEW AS NEW OLD AS OLD
    FOR EACH ROW
    DECLARE
    CURSOR CUR_DB_CR IS
         SELECT SUM(TR_ACCT_AMT),ACCT_AMT_DCIND
         FROM &TABLE_NAME
         WHERE COMPANY_CD = :NEW.company_cd
         AND PERIOD_CD = :NEW.period_cd
         AND TR_CD = :NEW.tr_cd
         AND DOC_NO = :NEW.doc_no
         AND DOC_DT = :NEW.doc_dt
         GROUP BY ACCT_AMT_DCIND ;
    lv_DB_TR_ACCT_AMT NUMBER ;
    lv_CR_TR_ACCT_AMT NUMBER ;
    lv_TR_ACCT_AMT NUMBER;
    lv_ACCT_AMT_DCIND VARCHAR2(1);
    BEGIN
    OPEN CUR_DB_CR ;
    LOOP
    FETCH CUR_DB_CR INTO lv_TR_ACCT_AMT,lv_ACCT_AMT_DCIND ;
    EXIT WHEN CUR_DB_CR%NOTFOUND ;
    IF lv_ACCT_AMT_DCIND = 'D' THEN
         lv_DB_TR_ACCT_AMT := lv_TR_ACCT_AMT;
    END IF ;
    IF lv_ACCT_AMT_DCIND = 'C' THEN
         lv_CR_TR_ACCT_AMT := lv_TR_ACCT_AMT;
    END IF ;
    END LOOP ;
    -- IF CUR_DB_CR%ROWCOUNT >= 2 THEN     
    IF lv_DB_TR_ACCT_AMT <> lv_CR_TR_ACCT_AMT THEN
         RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20055,'*START* Can Not INSERT..DEBIT CREDIT AMOUNT MISMATCH...! END');
    END IF ;
    -- END IF;
    CLOSE CUR_DB_CR;
    END ;

    The Mutating Table problem is tricky and difficult. First of all, I would ask for help on the database form rather than here.
    If you want your trigger to access and update other rows in the same table when you update or insert a row, you need to create several triggers, and they need to store and access data in a database package. There are some pointers on the Ask Tom website within Oracle.
    Good luck.

  • Mismatching of vat amount

    Hi Guru,
        my client is asking mismatching of vat amount that is -
                                                                 When generate annual VAT report containing assessable value along with tax values for a particular year which should match with purchases values declared in financial statements. The purchase values are arrived in financial statements as "closing stock of raw materials plus consumption of raw materials minus opening stock of raw materials" ;.  We are generating the VAT report  in T code S_ALR_87012385, which provides the purchase values for difference t ax codes. The values generated in this VAT report should match with the purchase values as per financial statements. Now it is not matching with report..
    Please let me know what are the reason it happen.
    It urgent.
    Regards,
    Manas

    Hi,
    VAT value is flowing from purchase order & VAT value depending the tax code available in the purchase order. You can check VAT value as % in FTXP t.code or FV13 with combination of tax code & VAT condition type.
    As you are getting same vale of VAT now in MIRO(same vale of VAT should not come for all PO in MIRO), may be purchase orders are having same quantity. Now just cross check again & again by doing MIRO with other purchase orders without posting, just carry out simulate document, check accounting entries.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Mismatch amount in posting & bank report-Payroll

    Dear Team,
    We using the tcode Pcoo_m99_ cipe (posting to account: create posting run), in simulation, all the employees have shown green. While match the data pc00_m99_cipe & bank report for salary & wage payable miss match around 4000/- only.
    Salary & wage payable is higher than bank report around Rs. 4000/-
    Kindly suggest how to find out the difference.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    Dear Praneeth,
    Thank you for your time & cooperation,
    In August month you maintained the IT 0015 sty 01 is it deduction wage type ? to deduct the amount which is brought forward from the July month ?
    Yes! It is deduction wage type & the same amount entered.
    in the august month have done FI postings (pc00_m99_cipe) for this employee or not ?- Yes
    In the month of august, we have done the posting, No error found.
    new employee confirmation action done in April and salary also increased in IT 0008.
    Now the same employee confirmed action process & salary also increased in IT 0008 with effect from April.
    i didn't understand the problem mismatch the salary register and posting amount..... please explain with example figures
    while cheking the bank report details & FI postings (pc00_m99_cipe) amount are mismatch.
    The mismatch amount is the same amount i.e. while analysis found that in FI posting consider the arrear on Basic, HRA, Conv  etc. and the amount is same as July.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

Maybe you are looking for