GR nonvaluated flagged automatically

Hi Experts,
when we use multiple costcenter for a line item in PO.System automatically flags GR nonvaluated in delivery tab on its own.
can anyone let me know how to avoid it and what is the reason behind this.
regards
subbu

Hi
When we use multiple account assignment object then the GR non valuated become mandatory, it is a standard SAP functionality that you can not change it.
Reason is there is no provision to post the qty to different cost centers during GR in standard SAP. I think it makes sense if you order the same material for different cost centers why we need some additional steps.
The system is taking care the account postings during IR for the multiple account assignment.
Hope it helps.
Thanks / Karthik
Edited by: Karthik on Aug 13, 2009 6:14 AM
Edited by: Karthik on Aug 13, 2009 6:19 AM

Similar Messages

  • Compare Flag - Automatically Adjustable

    Any risks in this setting when generating table maintenance for a custom table?
                     Thank-You.

    This flag indicates whether the maintenance transaction allows the
    (checked) activation of Business Configuration Sets (BC Sets), and the
    adjustment. This is the case if the maintenance transaction can run in
    the background.
    For more information, see the Application Help for the table maintenance
    generator (transaction SE54).
    The following settings exist:
    No Information
    The system does not know whether the maintenance transaction allows
    BC Set activation and adjustment.
    As with the setting "Not Adjustable", the content of the BC Sets is
    written to the Customizing tables without being checked.
    Not Adjustable
    The BC Sets cannot be activated and checked. The maintenance
    transaction does not support the adjustment.
    The content of the BC Sets is written to the Customizing tables
    without being checked.
    Instead of an adjustment, you can only compare the views or tables
    with another client or system. Any modifications that arise from an
    adjustment must be made manually.
    Adjustable in Dialog
    As with the setting "Not Adjustable", the content of the BC Sets is
    written to the Customizing tables without being checked.
    An automatic adjustment is not possible, however, you can compare
    the views or tables with another client or system, and adjust the
    differences (either all of them or a selection) with the dialog
    adjustment function.
    Automatically Adjustable
    BC Sets are activated with all field checks.
    The object can be adjusted automatically against another client as
    part of a Customizing import. This means that the data with
    differences can be imported from the comparison client. As well as
    the automatic adjustment option, the maintenance transaction also
    offers the dialog adjustment function.

  • Set Flag Automatically in Transaction BP

    Hello,
    We are in SRM 4.0 , classic scenario.
    We have a requirement to create a LSMW to set a flag "Central Block" under status tab for selected Business Partner.
    We tried this requirement using LSMW, Recordings. But it does not work.
    Do we have any BAPI or IDocs to process this sort requirements?
    Regards,
    Chary

    Hi Muthu,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I would like to set the flag directly in SRM. I am trying to do the same.
    Could you please provide the other method in ecc as well, so that I can try whether it suits our requirement.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Chary

  • Make to order scenario (GR Nonvaluated indicator is on by default)

    Hello Friends,
    I am working on make to order scenario. I have assigned  planning strategy 20 to the material. Against this material i created one sales order. Now with reference to this sales order i am creating the production order by transaction CO08. While doing these when i am checking under goods receipt tab, i am finding that GR Nonvaluated indicator is on by default. Because of this when i am doing the GR against these production order, system is not generating any accounting documents.
    I am unable to find how the GR Nonvaluated indicator under Goods Receipt tab in production order is on by default, in make to order scenario.
    Kindly share your valuable input on these.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Jitendra Chauhan

    Check
    Re: GR nonvaluated flagged automatically

  • Automatic source determination on PR created from PM-order

    Hey,
    I got stuck here....
    I have a PM-order, with a component, creating a PurReq automatically when saving PM-order.
    I have a source list with reference to a contract and fix-indicator.
    If I enter the PurReq and press source of supply, the source and contract will be determined.
    If I use ME57, the source will be determined.
    If I use ME51N, and flag automatic source in the top, it is also working.
    BUT what I want is not working!!
    I want the source to be determined automatically on creation, that is when I save my PM-order, I want SAP to create my PurReq with the source assigned automatically - upon creation!
    How is that possible??
    / peter

    Hi Peter,
    In standard SAP functionality vendor will not be fetched from source list, if the PR is created from Maintenance Order.
    However, you can use user exit  - COZF0002: Maintenance order: Change purchase requisition for external component Area.
    With this customer enhancement you can change the purchase requisition created from PM order.
    We have not implemented the said user exit, so please check the documentation & test the same.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mihir Popat

  • Automatic Posting accounts not allowed when G/L Account is entered in LIPS

    Dear all,
    In order to override the standard G/L account determination when PGI a delivery, we developed a routine to write the G/L account devired by the system and populate LIPS-KONTO with the account we want to post.
    This is working perfectly as soon as that G/L account does not have the flag "automatic postings only" is not flagged.
    However, is this flag is active, we are not able to PGI.
    Do you know if this is the normal SAP behaviour?  Any suggestions if we must use that account?
    thanks!
    Fátima Pereira

    Hello,
    The situation is the following....
    Two items in the sales order with two different item categories and same movement type.
    This movement type is customized in OMWN with Account Modifier ZVA that is linked to account A.
    In case of the first item category this will be ok.
    On the second item category the customer wants to keep the same movement type but post into a different account.
    During delivery processing we created in a userexit to override the derived Account Modifier to another one that we need and retrieve that account and populate LIPS-KONTO.
    Conclusion:
    1)  If we use the standard account determination, LIPS-KONTO is not filled in and the system considers an automatic posting.
    2) If the LIPS-KONTO is filled in with a GL Account that has the "automatic postings only" set, the system apparently is considering this a manual posting.
    My question is:  Is this the Standard SAP behaviour?
    Regards,
    Fátima

  • Automatic Goods movement from CO11N for serialized materials

    Hello,
    I'm dealing with confirmation of discrete production orders. When I confirm last operation, the system has to post Good Receipt automatically but materials are serialized, so I know I cannot use flag "Automatic GR" in control key.
    My requirement is:
    soon after the confirmation, I want to call MIGO transaction (movement type 101) with order number, yield confirmed, material code coming from CO11N.
    Both CO11N and MIGO have to be on line transactions.
    I have activated enhancement CONFPP05 but the call transaction MIGO gives me the message "Order xxx is already being processed" because the confirmation isn't still saved .
    The BADI WORKORDER_CONFIRM has the same problem.
    I haven't found an exit after saving the confirmation.
    Have you any suggest?
    Regards
    Nue

    Hello
    You can try Background job for all confirmed order, ran MIGO background
    thanks
    bala

  • Automatically mark images that have been exported

    Hi,
    i really wished LR had a seperate flag for images that have been exported yet. It would be perfect if LR would set that flag automatically when an image has been exported. Just like in RSP.
    An oh, speaking about Rawshooter Premium, we need a REAL BACKGROUND EXPORT STACK just like in RSP.
    Fred

    @ DW Harrison
    It should simply be a visual hint (in the grid mode especially. could be a star or just an icon) that reminds you which images (of a collection) have already been exported - in whatever format.
    @Grafin
    In fact i _do_ use a color code for this purpose, but it would be nicer if it gets set automatically by LR, not manually my me.
    Regards,
    Fred

  • 'Final issue' indicator automatically

    Hello,
    A flow has been developed to transfer material (assigned to network activity) from 1 plant to another plant through a stock transfer order with a specific movement type . Find that 'Final issue' on material tab is not getting flagged automatically (and reservation not getting closed) automatically on PGI of delivery from STO.
    Like to know the probable reason or the setting which does it automatically on PGI on complete quantity.
    With regards,
    Mrinal

    Hi Ahmed,
    We have created a new flow in PS , wherein materials are transferred from one plant to another plant through Stock transport . A new movement type (copy of MT 641) has been created for STO so that the cost is booked on project on PGI from STO Delivery.Materials are assigned to different activities (assigned to different plant) under the same network.
    Observe that the reservations on WBS on source plant is not getting reduced on PGI of delivery from STO.
    With regards,
    Mrinal

  • Transport Request is not flagged for import into production.

    When I try to migrate a CR from the quality system to the acceptance system, through solution manager system, the status flag still remains to be "To be tested" which normally does not happen.
    I get 4 warnings as below:
    1) Status was reset by system
    2) No import into test system has taken place.
    3) Transport request is not flagged for import into production
    4) The tester role cannot be the same as the developer role.
    Usually when a CR is selected for migration to Acceptance, the status flag automatically sets to "productive", which in turn depicts that the CR has been migrated to acceptance and is ready for import into production.
    But when I check the Transport log in the acceptance system, it is evident that the CR has been migrated to acceptance with errors.

    I guess these errors you mentioned are the reason why ChaRM reports your transprot request as
    2) No import into test system has taken place.
    1) Status was reset because 2) is not fullfilled.
    3) did not get flagged because status was not set due to previous errors.
    4) business partner of user with function "tester" (apparently the one who tries to set status) is the same as the business partner assigned to function "developer". If it should be the same person you can switch off the warning in customizing.
    Try to correct import errors and repeat status switch.

  • What is Reconciliation Flag in General Ledger.

    What is feature of GL Reconcilation available in R12. How should we update the Reconciliation Flag automatically.

    This is to allow reconciliation of accounts which should net to zero.
    The configuration is to flag which account codes should net to zero and therefore be automatically reconciled if net to zero.
    I have not actually used this feature as yet but i guess it means those flagged accounts do not have to be manually reconciled at month end if they net to zero and therefore
    shows that there is some issue if they do not net to zero.
    Hope this helps.

  • Field "GR Non-valuated" in tab "Goods receipt" of the production order

    Hi,
    When creating a production order, the field "GR Non-valuated" in tab "Goods receipt" is checked by default, due to my assessment customizing.
    This field indicates to the system that it should not create any accounting document, whereas I would like to create one. Does anyone know how to withdraw this automatically check?
    FYI, I do not use COPA and the very basic of CO-PC and I would like to create automatically a default assessment rule (cost center).
    Thanks for your help.
    Ronan

    Hi,
    please note that this is not an MM, but a PP-SCF related issue. It does not belong to the forum ERP MM.
    The indicator AFPOD-WEUNB is set automatically as soon                  
    as you do not settle your production order to category 'MAT' (see                    
    settlement rule). If the order is not settled to a material, then the                
    Goods Receipt will not be valuated and the flag G/R Non-valuated (WEUNB)             
    is set. Only when you settle to a Material is the G/R Non-valuated not              
    set, and you will  receive FI postings in the case of such a movement.               
    This is standard system behaviour.                                                   
    Please review the following notes relating to settlement rules: 518496,              
    400400.                                                                               
    To make sure that the GR-Nonvaluated flag is not set in the                          
    production order, field KZBWS must already be filled with 'M' in the                 
    customer requirement. For that, please set the field KZBWS='M' for the               
    requirement class that is used (see 'General Customizing' in note                    
    459734). PLAF-KZBWS (indicator:valuation of special stock).  
    Regards,
    Edit

  • How to make a default value by using dynamic actions

    Hi,
           I want to default a field nationality in infotype 0002 as a great britan, using dynamic actions but unable to go ahead. Any help regarding this really appreciate.
    Regards
    Niranjan

    Hi,
    I need some guidance around creating dynamic action with default value, Please guide me through.
    I am aware I can set default values for new infotype, but I need to set default value for same infotype, let me explain the scenario.
    Currently employee is on one pension scheme which is called NE1 and now we are moving this employee to CRESP Pension Scheme.
    When employee is in NE1, his IT0071 has got a opt in field with a flag on, when the same employee is moved from NE1 pension scheme to CRESP Pension scheme, his new IT0071 record should have the same opt in field with a flag on, I want it to set this flag automatically using dynamic action. I dont want to update this field manually, while moving from NE1 to CRESP.
    Currently the below dynamic  action is coded when employees are being moved form NE1 to CRESP, but now they will have a opt in flag which should appear automatically, What needs to be done to make this happen?
    Please let me know if I set default value for the Opt in field for the same infotype.
    . When employees are being moved from NE1 to CRESP pension scheme we currently use a dynamic action as show below:
    0071                      04      10      I        INS,0069
    0071                      04      20      W       P0069-BEGDA=P0071-BEGDA
    0071                      04      30      W       P0069-ENDDA=P0071-ENDDA
    0071                      06      1        F        DYNACT_PAE031(ZHRPROG016)
    Also if it is not possible via dynamic action could you please explain how to create it using user exit, I am not an ABAPer.
    Your help is very much appreciated.
    Kind Regards,
    SK

  • Document contains some order item more than once - invoice verification

    Hi,
    we have one cross company stock transfer process in which when a billing is created in SD side, an IDOC will be triggered automatically and create an invoice verification at the MM side.
    The problem is some of our billing of this process having an IDOC application error that said.
    Document contains same order item more than once
    Message no. M8321
    Diagnosis
    Under the following circumstances, you can settle an order item in an invoice received via EDI more than once:
    - Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification has been defined for the order item.
    - The IDoc contains the delivery note numbers of the goods receipts.
    System Response
    If this is not the case, the system cancels posting of the IDoc.
    Question:
    1 - The funny thing is IDOC showing 51 IDOC error code message on status record of INVOIC. But the invoice verfication get created in PO history.
    2 - I think this error is because we need to make the PO as GR-based Inverifcation. We have flagged it in Vendor master, and Info record, but this indicator is not flag automatically in the PO (and we cannot manually change the PO as this indicator is grey-out). How?
    3 - how to solve this error?
    Thanks

    Once PO history is created, you cannot change the "GR-based-IV" flag. Two options are there before you.
    1. Cancel all the GRs & Invoices posted in the STO then system will allow you to update the GR-based-IV flag. After updating this flag repost the GRs and invoices.
    2. Create a new STO, now since you have updated the vendor maser & info-record, this flag will automatically get updated during the STO creation itself.
    First option is tedious and should be selected only if you can go option 2 is not at all feasible

  • ME21N-Deliver completed check box in delivey tab to be given user authorzn

    In ME21N User A creates the Po for a Quantity 100 Nos & then he makes a MIGO for the qty 60 Nos:He comes back to ME22N in *DELIVERY TAB where in there will be a check box as DELIVERY COMPLETED :He will ensure to tick the same & save.
    So Other User B enters the same PO in ME22N & Removes the ticked  check box as DELIVERY COMPLETED & saves it.
    Please suggest me the solution based on the same.

    Hi Murali,
    This issue is because of the user transaction authorization, user A & B. And it can be done by sap security authorization by basis for that perticular transaction, then system can not allow to change or modify any data pertaining to the PO. So, please contact sap basis consultant, will be doing that, so that user can not change the data manually. And
    Basically when we talk about the the Delivery Completion Indicator, it should not be set manually, but it will be flagged by system automatically soon after the goods are received fully.
    For a good business practise: this
    "Deliv. Compl." -> indicator in Delivery tab of Item details is not to be set by user manually, because system will be updating that with flagged automatically soon after the full goods are received.
    Hope it clarifies you,
    Regards,
    Srin

Maybe you are looking for