GROUP BY & ORDER BY in a Report

How to Implement GROUP BY & ORDER BY in a Report?

Hi,
Order by: It is possible to sort the char value according to the values (asc or desc) of an atribute of this char...is this what you were looking for?
Group by: May be can be achieved by drilldwon sequence, with the grouping char to the left of the char values to be grouped...again, is this what you had in mind?

Similar Messages

Grouping of Shopping Carts using the report BBP_SC_TRANSFER_GROUPED

Hi Experts,
I am a new SRM consultant and have been asked to investigate an issue regarding grouping of Shopping Carts using the report BBP_SC_TRANSFER_GROUPED.
The wanted scenario:
For one specific vendor we wish to pool/group request coming from various shopping carts into one PO e.g. once a day. The shopping carts for that vendor can be destinguished by one specific product category.
We are on classic scenario hence the PO will be created in our ECC system.
Settings we have done to accomplish what we want:
1. We have set up the transfer for grouping on the specific product category in the sourcing area in the IMG structure
2. We have run the report BBP_SC_TRANSFER_GROUPED (grouping takes place according to the product category)
This approach works, the shopping carts gets grouped into one PO in ECC. however the line items from the Shopping Carts are mixed in the PO eg SC1: Item A, Item B, Item C, Item D SC2: Item 1, Item 2, Item 3, Item 4 PO (Current result) Item A, Item 1, Item B, Item 2, Item C, Item 3, Item D, Item 4.
This seems quite strange, as there are no logic reason for this split. It would be understandable if it was a matter of delivery dates of the goods, but they are not in any order i.e. first coming delivery date first.
Does anyone know how to correct this or can anyone clarify why this sequence mix happens?
For me it seems like a program errror.
Hope you can help me solve this issues
Cheers Christian
Edited by: Christian Gjellerup on Aug 6, 2010 3:34 PM
Edited by: Christian Gjellerup on Aug 6, 2010 3:35 PM

Hi,
In SRM -Product categories = Purchasing group in SAP R/3.
During the transfer of P.R from R/3 you have enter the Purchasing group in R/3.
In SRM in the PPOMA_BBP in the extended attribute you can enter the exact product categories
or else enter * in the product categoies and the backend logical system
in SPRO --define objects in backend system --- in this enter the purchasing group and category Id
check your default settings in the SRM web browser
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar

Dynamic columns with grouping.... in crystal report...using java /c# api ??

I need to create a report with dynamic columns
for e.g/
                                       Pre   Scen 1   Scen 2   Scen 3   Scen 4   Scen 5   Scen 6      .....
*Total                          4.5118   4.5118    4.5118   4.5118   4.5118        4.5118   4.5118     *
*Canada                    1.7180    1.7180    1.7180   1.7180 1.4103     8.4103      8.4103     *
   BG                           1.6224    0.9641    1.0473   1.0473 6.4635     6.4635 1.6224
   BI                              0.044     0.0827     0.3578   0.3578 0.0560     0.0560   0.0744
DIN                    0.0056     -0.0655     -0.0215     -0.0215     -0.0210     -0.0210     0.0056
*Czech Republic     1.7180     1.7180     1.7180     1.7180     18.4103     18.4103     18.4103     *
CEE               0.0275     1.0000     0.7359     100.0000     0.0858     0.0858     0.0275
*Israel               1.7180     1.7180     1.7180     1.7180     18.4103     18.4103     18.4103     *
F                    0.0077     1.0000     0.7359     100.0000     -0.0035     -0.0035     0.0077
*United States          1.7180     1.7180     1.7180     1.7180     18.4103     18.4103     18.4103     *
A                    0.0144     0.1871     91.0473     0.0679     0.0544     0.0544     0.0144
AA                    0.0428     0.0626     0.3578     0.0675     0.1175     0.1175     0.0428
AB                    0.0431     0.1553     -0.0215     0.1685     0.1199     0.1199     0.0431
in this report....grouping will be parameterized ....and total also required at every stage...
so how can i add the columns dynamically ?
number of columns are not fixed...they may be 20...30....etc

Requirement is...
I have a table scn ... where i can make entries any time....assume they are some rules...
I have another table called t1 ... where i need to calculate values of t1 again some specific rules are table scn.
So for each t1 there will be one row with columns as scn entries which I select on interface.
         Original Value -- Sc1 ...... Sc2 ...... Sc3 ...... Sc4 ...... Sc5 . . . . . .. .
t1...................xx...... xx..........xx..........xx........ xx........ xx
t3...... .............xx...... xx..........xx..........xx........ xx........ xx
t4....................xx...... xx..........xx..........xx........ xx........ xx
selection of these scn columns will be dynamic....so i cant create n number of columns in the report template and hide them as per requirement....it will not work.
Wat is a feasible solution to create such kind of report ?
Can we create template in C# or .net ?
IF yes...do we have to save every time in order to render report ?
e.g.   one report may contain 4 columns and other 10 ... so do i have to create new rpt file each in order to render the report ?
Please if any1 have approach to create this kind of report then it will very helpful....
Edited by: pchawan on Jul 19, 2011 11:28 PM

Not able to see Purchase Order No in FBL1N Report

Dear All,
I am not able to see Purchase Order Number in FBL1N report. I have tried in change layout by selecting the purchase document but system is not displaying.
Kindly help me on this.
Regards,
Yadayya

Dear Yadayya,
in reference to your query please review the SAP note
152335 Field EBELN in line layout variant for cust./vendor
Please note that field BSEG-EBELN is not possible for being shown
with a value in FBL1N and FBL5N as explained in the note above.
Since Release 3.0, several purchase orders can be offset in one invoice.
As a result, different purchasing document numbers (BSEG-EBELN) can be
contained in the different G/L account line items.
As a result, it is no longer possible to enter a unique purchasing
document number in the customer/vendor line item.Field BSEG-EBELN is not
filled in the vendor line item and therefore cannot be displayed in the
line item display for customers/vendors.
Hope this information helps to clarify the standard system behaviour.
Mauri

Is there is a way to have a link from purchase order to cost center report.

Is there is a way to have a link from purchase order to cost center report.
I am meaning kind of:
Standard way to customized this link?
or
User exit to have this link in place
or
Any other solution
Thanks

For me it does not make any sense from going from PO to cost center report.
However, if you want to see the purchase order cost incurred with a cost center, execute KSB1 report. Within the layout, bring "Purchasing Document" field, where you can see the purchase order number in cost center line item report.

Report on production order status and shortage report

I want to know standard report on production order status and shortage report. Kindly suggest.

COOIS - Production order information system . In this report you can give system status in selection screen and in report you can get complete status details (both system and user status) .
shortage report - CO24

Purchase Order Creation from ME5A Report

Hi experts,
My client wants Purchase Order Creation from ME5A Report.
He wants show Open Purchase Requisition through ME5A report then he will select Purchase Requisition Number or line item for po creation from there only.
Please advice how I can map this process in sap.
Thanks in advance,
Chandhu

Why don't you use ME57 to display open PRs and then assign sources and convert them to PO?
Or use ME57 to assign sources and ME59 to automatically convert them to PO.
You can create your very own format for report display using custom "Scope Of List" for ME57.
Look in SPRO under Purchasing>Reporting>Maintain Purchase requisition lists.

Print group name on a page of Report

I have sorted my data on my report, printing a group on each page of my report.
On each page, i would like to print the name of the current group (easy) but also the name of the previous page group. How can i do that ?
Using GroupName()...?

duplicate - please do not post multiple times

What are the key fields used to group double orders in t-code SDD1?

What are the key fields used to group double orders in t-code SDD1?
Cheers,
VT

Hi,
You can group the duplicate sales documents with the help of the following fields,
Sold-To-Party,Document type,date and sales area details.
Regards,
Gopal.

Order cost plan in report CN41N

Hi Gurus,
Would appreciate if any one of share what is 'Order Cost Plan" in report CN41N.
Infact, the values displayed in Order cost plan column neither coincide with either Project Cost Plan nor Actual cost displayed.
Looking forward to hear and thaks in advnace.
Thanks,
PSR

Hi PSR,
Order Cost Plan in CN41N is PM Order Plan Costs figure.
If you create PM Order and assign WBS Element/Project Def in Additional Data Tab of PM Order after planning Material services system will consider WBSE as Costing object and Plan and Post cost on WBSE. It will appears in CN41N in Order Cost Plan column.
Please check
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Swapnil Kharul.

Use Handling Units to group production orders?

Hello,
can I use Handling Units to group production orders together? We have a workcenter where all our orders go through and we'd like to group, say, the morning's orders in a single HU on which we could post a single transaction (batch?) instead of posting on each and every order.
Thanks,
Jonathan

Please check OSS note 793168.

XK03 can be restricted by account group in order to prevent general users

Hello Gurus,
Please advise, if XK03 can be restricted by account group in order to prevent general user population from displaying employee data ?
I understand that XK03 has auth object F_LFA1_GRP for account group in which I restricted with 03 and particular account groups but still the test is failing because the test user is able to view employee data.
Please suggest..
Regard's
Salman

Hi Alex,
Thank you !
By your last update, do you mean auth group or account group? If you are talking about auth group then this auth object F_LFA1_BEK (XK03) has auth group.
I checked the F_LFA1_GRP is active in SU24. Is there something which i need to look in F_LFA1_BEK for particular auth group after restricting the auth object F_LFA1_GRP with account group ?
Thank you for your valuable suggestions
Regard's
Salman

Query for Group by & order by

Hi all,
I have a table name as angdata77 having attributes like asigno..
i want to retrieve data from angdata77 by using both group by & order by clauses.. for total count..
am using the query as
select asigno,count(*) from angdata77 group by asigno order by asigno;
Is there any other query for retrieving the data from angdata77
Thanks in Advance,
Venkatesh J.

885756 wrote:
Ya it's good.. Performance also good while retrieving data...
I want to know other Possibilities also sir...There will be no better alternative for this, because this is the most simple and straight forward way to get the output you are looking for..
Go ahead without any confusion... :)

EA1 - SQL Formatter issues (JOINs and GROUPs and ORDER BY oh my ;)

Great job with improving the SQL Formatter, but it still has some bugs that need to be worked out.
The key words JOIN and it's modifiers INNER, LEFT, RIGHT and FULL OUTER are not recognized as master key words. As such they end up flush against the left margin Also when GROUP BY and/or ORDER BY key words are present in an outer most select statement the other key words are not indented far enough to be right aligned with the end of the word BY and are indented too far to be right aligned with the word GROUP or ORDER. In sub queries, GROUP and ORDER BY are correctly right aligned with their respective SELECT statements.

We're picking up and collating the Formatter issues. I'll add these.
Specific bug for these #7013462
Sue

Problem with group by/order by clause when using huge data

Hi,
I'm using below query on my table of size more than 210 million rows.
SELECT booking_date FROM T_UTR
WHERE four_eyes_status = 'A' AND booking_date <= '01-jul-2005' AND booking_date >= '01-jan-2004'
AND invoice_id IS NULL AND link_id = 12345
AND billing_indicator = 'L'
GROUP BY booking_date ORDER BY booking_date
If I'm skipping last line "GROUP BY booking_date ORDER BY booking_date", its giving me immediate result, but, because of group by/order by, the query may take 30 seconds to 2 minutes based on the data fetched for the date range. It may vary from 2 to 2 million rows, & grouping by for so many rows at run time will automatically take some time.
Here I want to know, is there any procedure in oracle(any function based index) so that I can store/retrieve distinct values for link_id, & booking_date without grouping them at run time. Or the performance of the query can be increased
Thanks
Deepak

Hi,
You can use Materialized Views as stated earlier - specifically by using Query Rewrite. If the conditions on columns "four_eyes_status", "invoice_id", and "billing_indicator" never change in your query - then you can create a Materialized View that is targeted for those conditions and has lower cardinality (since you aren't grouping by those columns). The "COUNT(*)" allows the use of the DISTINCT operator in addition to "GROUP BY' as well for Query Rewrite.
Create the Materialized View like this:
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW test_mv1
BUILD IMMEDIATE
USING NO INDEX
REFRESH FORCE ON DEMAND
ENABLE QUERY REWRITE
AS
SELECT booking_date
     , link_id
     , COUNT(*) AS count_star
FROM T_UTR
WHERE four_eyes_status = 'A'
AND invoice_id IS NULL
AND billing_indicator = 'L'
GROUP BY booking_date
       , link_id ;To improve performance further - create an index on the "LINK_ID" column like this:
CREATE INDEX test_mv1_link_id_idx
ON test_mv1 (link_id);Then - gather stats immediately on the Materialized View so that the CBO can use it for rewriting your original query - like this:
BEGIN
   DBMS_STATS.gather_table_stats (ownname               => USER
                                , tabname               => 'TEST_MV1'
                                , partname              => NULL
                                , estimate_percent      => DBMS_STATS.auto_sample_size
                                , block_sample          => FALSE
                                , method_opt            => 'FOR ALL COLUMNS SIZE 1'
                                , degree                => NULL
                                , granularity           => 'ALL'
                                , cascade               => TRUE
                                , no_invalidate         => FALSE
END;
/Now - the CBO should be able to rewrite your original query to use the Materialized View - provided you set up your session for Query Rewrite like this:
ALTER SESSION SET query_rewrite_enabled = TRUE;
ALTER SESSION SET query_rewrite_integrity = ENFORCED; -- set this to whatever staleness you can tolerate - see the docs for details...Now - after setting up your session - try running your query with autotrace to see if it was rewritten...
Good luck!
Message was edited by:
PDaddy

GROUP BY & ORDER BY in a Report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for