Hardware platform for running JDeveloper

Hi,
I'm running JDeveloper version 10.1.3.0.4 on an intel p4 2.8 ghz with 1.2 gigs of ram.
I'm wondering if this is enough "horsepower" to use JDeveloper effectively.
I'd like to hear from fellow developers on what their system specs are with relation to cpu and ram.

Hi, according to the installation guide , these are
the recommended hardware requirements:
Windows
Windows 2000-Service Pack 4
Windows NT-Service Pack 6a
Windows XP-Service Pack 2
CPU Type and Speed
Pentium IV 2 GHz or faster
Memory
1 GB RAM
Display
65536 colors, set to at least 1024 X 768 resolution
Hard Drive Space
Base Installation: 375 MB
Complete Installation: 500 MB
Java SDK Sun J2SE 1.5.0_05 for Windows, available at: http://www.javasoft.com.
Linux
Distribution
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0
CPU Type and Speed
Pentium IV 2 GHz or faster
Memory
1 GB RAM
Display
65536 colors, set to at least 1024 X 768 resolution
Hard Drive Space
Base Installation: 375 MB
Complete Installation: 500 MB
Java SDK
Sun J2SE 1.5.0_05 for Linux, available at: http://www.javasoft.com.
===============================
You can check this documentation under
$JDEV_HOME\jdev directory.
Regards,
Luis.

Similar Messages

Hardware requirement for running exchange 2010 on vmware workstation

Dear Team,I need to create a exchange 2010 sp2 on a guest os on vmware workstation.kindly help me out with the physical hardware requirements for a home user

Hey Mukund26,
Before I answer your questions, my suggestion would be for you to figure out exactly what you want to get out of running that Exchange lab. Are you trying to learn Exchange features like DAGs? Are you trying to learn about virtualizing Exchange? When you figure that out you'll be better able to answer question 1 since you may not need all of those virtual machines.
Here are my thoughts on your questions.
1) It is probably technically possible to run 10 virtual machines on the configuration you have but you're going to have pretty bad performance. I would try to trim that down to only the virutal machines that you really need in order to use the lab how you want to use it. Here are some questions that may help you figure out what you need:
Why do you need two domain controllers? I don't think you need to worry as much about redundancy in your lab.
Why do you need 2 ESXi hosts and a vCenter? What purpose do they serve in this configuration? Are you trying to run the Exchange VMs nested under the ESXi VMs? If so, why?
Is there a reason why you want to separate out HTS/CAS from MBX in your lab? Combining all roles together can reduce the number of VMs you need. If you separate out the roles you'll need to allocate a lot of RAM to support all of those Exchange VMs.
2) Running a lot of virtual machines on a single 1TB SATA disk, especially a 5400 RPM disk, is going to be slow. It'll be especially painful when the VMs are booting up, rebooting, shutting down, etc.. Try to stagger the power on operations so they don't all boot at once. For example, first boot your DCs, then boot your HTS/CAS, then your MBX, etc. There is no doubt that configuration will be slow, so if you can get your hands on an solid state drive with enough space you'll have significantly better performance. For the purposes of a lab, though, it is probably ok if you can be patient.
3) I think the i5 processor will be just fine for this lab. Usually in a lab setting CPU performance isn't the most important thing so similar to above as long as you can be a little patient I think that CPU will suit you just fine.
As I said figure out what you want to get out of the lab and then you can determine how many VMs you need and whether or not you want to upgrade hardware. If you're looking to learn about Exchange 2010 in general I would suggest using multirole servers, getting rid of one of the DCs, and not worrying about virtualizing ESX/vCenter so that you can learn. If you're looking to learn about virtualizing Exchange 2010 on vSphere then let's figure out exactly what you want to get out of it and figure out what you can learn using VMware Workstation and what you really need vSphere for.
Best of luck!
Matt
http://www.thelowercasew.com

Better hardware configuration for using JDeveloper

Hi,
What is the better configuration for using such since every time I felt absolutely slow when using it?
Thks & Rgds,
HuaMin

HuaMin,
Kind of hard to say what's better, since you don't tell us what you currently have. However, I find that RAM is your friend when running JDeveloper. I've run JDeveloper 10.1.3.x on various laptops (both single and dual core) with 2GB of RAM and performance is quite good. The CPU speeds that I've used are generally in the 2GHz range. My current setup is a dual core 2 GHZ with 2 GB of RAM and I'm quite happy
John

Need suggestion on the entire hardware specs for running Oracle VM 2.2.2

Hi,
I need some suggestion on the preffered hardware specs which can be given to a customer, he wants to run Oracle VM 2.2.2 or Oracle VM 2.2.1.
He has already used Cisco UCS with NetApp storage for OVM 2.2.2/2.2.1 and has being unsucessful with lots of issues creeping up. Thus now need suggestion on the hardware spec which is well tested and works fine with Oracle VM 2.2.2/2.2.1 and he wants to run Oracle Fusion Middleware on top of it.
Any poniters to it will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Sk

887469 wrote:
Hi Avi,
thank you for that information !
Yes. But only for the UCS gear that uses the converged FCoE adapters. If you have standard Ethernet/FC adapters, then it should be OK.We do use the "M71KR-Q QLogic Converged Network Adapter" with UCS. According to you this is an unsupported combination together with OVM 2.2.1, right ?
Now the "Oracle VM 2.2 Validated Configuration Details" shows UCS B200 M1 with M71KR-Q as a valid configuration. Does 2.2 mean OVM 2.2.0 and this is supported, but 2.2.1 / 2.2.2 is not ?
Please clarify since this confuses me.
Best Regards and TIAAny news for me, please ?
THX

Hardware requirements for JDeveloper 3.0

What are the minimum and recommended hardware requirements for
JDeveloper 3.0?
null

Jasmin,
JDeveloper 3.0 REQUIRES:
NT 4.0
Pentium 200Mhz processor
96M of RAM
225 MB (360 MB when using WebHelp) for a typical install
130 MB (265 MB when using WebHelp) for a minimal install
and RECOMMENDS:
NT 4.0
Pentium 266Mhz processor or higher
128M of RAM
225 MB (360 MB when using WebHelp) for a typical install
130 MB (265 MB when using WebHelp) for a minimal install
JDeveloper 3.0 is compatible with 8.0.5, 7.3.x and 8.1.5 versions
of the database.
Laura
Jasmin (guest) wrote:
: hi,
: can anyone let me know:
: 1. what are the hardware requirements for installing
jdeveloper
: suite 3.0
: 2. whether jdeveloper3.0 is compatible ot oracle 8.0.5 on NT or
: not?
: i would appreciate any reply from u guys...
: Thanks
: Jasmin
null

Preferred Hardware Plattform for Linux RAC Cluster

What ist the preferred Hardware Platform
for using LINUX with Oracle RAC - Cluster solution ?
What do you prefer Suse or Redhat ?
Is there a tested Hardware Environment from Oracle Support ?
Thanks

You have the disk space, but not the memory, even discounting the memory for the Oracle VM hypervisor, OEL/RH5 is going to take at least 1G to run. So, with your base OS, hypervisor, Linux and Oracle (clusterware and DB), it may be possible, but I believe you would be swapping so much you would have terrible performance. I would look at a MINIMUM of 3GB if not 4GB RAM to try this configuration.
Cheers
Jay
http://www.grumpy-dba.com

Hardware requirements for using BI-IP

Hello experts,
i would like to have something like a how to paper in which i can find something about the hardware requirements for ideal using of BI integrated planning. Can anyone give me a help?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Ali

HI Ali,
I have been unable to find specific hardware requirements for using BI -IP so I would refer you to the hardware requirements for running Bi as per notes:
1013139 - prereqs for frontend bi7
1013201 - Hardware and Software requirement for BI Standalone frontend
and please also review the IP note:
1056259 - Collective note: Performance of BI planning
I hope this helps
best regards
Orla.

Can't Run JDeveloper 11g on JDK 6_13 for Windows 64-bit

Hi all,
When I attempt to run JDeveloper 11g (base install), and select my java.exe file from my JDK 6_13x64 installation I get the following error message:
"Unable to find Java Virtual Machine.
"To point to a location of a Java Virtual Machine, please refer to the Oracle9i JDeveloper Install Guide (jdev\install.html)."
In addition to the incorrect version number, the JDeveloper Install Guide makes no mention of this problem. I've found a few posts on this forum where people had this problem, but they're all pretty old, and none of them got satisfactory answers. A few possibilities mentioned in those posts that I've eliminated are as follows:
- I've confirmed that this is, indeed, the JDK, not just a JRE.
- This is the production version of JDeveloper 11g, not a technical preview, so it shouldn't require 1.5.
- There are no spaces in the paths to either the JDK or JDeveloper.
Has anyone found a solution to this problem?
Thanks much,
Avrom

Thanks, Shay. That does seem to work, and will suffice as a workaround for now. But are there plans to make JDeveloper compatible with the 64-bit edition of Java? It would be nice to get what I assume is a substantial performance enhancement from using it.
10:06 PM: Actually, it doesn't work very well. JDeveloper will start, but it has a lot of stability problems; it seems to freeze at 100% CPU usage (well, 25%, but I'm on a quad processor) at the drop of a hat, such as when I minimize, walk away for 90 minutes, and come back--once it even did it just when I tried to create a new application. I've installed this version of JDev on a 32-bit system and have found it to be generally quite stable, so I assume this is a problem with my setup.
Edited by: Avrom on May 10, 2009 10:06 PM

I'm a video editor working primarily in FCP7 and just purchased the latest Mac Pro running Yosemite ? Does anyone know if any options have become available for running FCP7 on this platform ?

I'm a video editor working primarily in FCP7 and just purchased the latest Mac Pro running Yosemite ? Does anyone know if any options have become available for running FCP7 on this platform ?

It would "run" (more like Sunday stroll or walk) if you installed Snow Leopard in a VM. Especially if you have 6-core (and would help to have 6 or 8 cores anyway if you were able to and intend to make best use of nMP for video editing).
If you "classic" Mac Pro was 2009 or later, adding two AMD graphic cards, upgrading the processor to 8-core 3.xGHz would have gotten you a FCP-X capable machine and still dual boot and use Snow Leopard as needed.
Any Mac Pro can now use 1000MB/sec SSD PCIe blade to boot from and/or for scratch and editing to help improve work flow.
SSD Blade Drive for "Classic" Mac Pro

Need help trying to determine what hardware I can run for develpoment testing purposes for Solaris Sparc 11.2

I have a large client that is looking to upgrade from Solaris 5.9 up to Solaris 11.2. I need to find some hardware I can run in house to do development, run tests and run setups/configuration on a 64 bit Sparc machine. I know Solaris 11 dropped support for some of the UltraSPARC II, III, IV series. However I need to have a setup in shop locally for me to work on. Any ideas on if buy a sun blade workstation or another workstation that I could get Solaris 11.2 installed? I don't necessarily need the GUI desktop but the text/curses based setup is all I need. Any ideas on where to go? Seems like the cutoff from Solaris 10 to 11 was a pretty big one regarding legacy support of older hardware. Also I know there are x86 distributions of Solaris 11.2 but I have 3rd party software that is compiled on Sparc.

Have you seen the HCL?
I write most of my labs on Virtual Box, and also use a few older 5440s and some new M10s when I want to shoe LDOMs.
OTN - Oracle Solaris 11: Hardware Compatibility List

How can i get or download the apple hardware test for a macbook pro made in 2012 running Mavericks 10.9.3

Does anyone know how can i get or download the apple hardware test for a macbook pro made in 2012 running Mavericks 10.9.3. Thanks.

Sean and Andy -
I have to agree with Andy here. I am having the same problem on a mid 2010 MBP (6,2). I have already read the AHT info provided by Sean's link, and they are less than helpful. I'm sure they will be helpful to those who find that they work, but they are confusing if this is not the case. For example, my MBP(6,2) came with ONE (not two) installation disks, so the instructions don't work for me. Another issue is the instructions confound the descriptions related to the MBP, the original (delivered) software (OS X version), and the current installed OS X upgrade software.
So here's what does NOT work for me...
     (A) I cannot install 'Disk 2', since I never received this with my original (new) purchase in mid 2010.
     (B) I have checked my firmware versions and they are all up to date, as per Apple's information.
     (C) As suggested in another thread, I looked for /Library/Core Services/.diagnostics and it was NOT present. I followed his instructions, downloaded the correct (I believe) dmg, and installed it. It is in the correct place, and I can see all the invisible files using Pathfinder.
     (D) When I re-start holding down the D key (immediately), it just goes through the normal boot routine; no evidence of AHT.
     (E.1) When I re-start holding down OPT-D, I get a spinning globe, and then it prompts me for a network (wi-fi) connection.
     (E.2) For some unknown reason, the prompt identifies between 2 and 5 of my --neighbors'-- routers, but does not show mine. (??!!)
     (E.3) The routers are listed alphabetically; however, my router SHOULD be at the top of the list by this criterion, but it is nowhere to be seen.
     (E.4) The 'internet recovery' process then allows me to enter a network name AND password. I do this, for my current wi-fi router, and the process rejects it as an incorrect login ID. It is NOT an incorrect login ID!
So, now asking Sean and Andy (or anyone else) for further suggestions... ??? As Andy suggested, many people ask questions here because they have -already- worked through the 'official' recommendations, and have found them to be inadequate.
Any advice would be appreciated! TIA.
Ed

Minimum Hardware Requirement for Siebel CRM 8.0 for Linux Platform?

Hi,
What are the minimum hardware requirement for Siebel CRM 8.0 for Linux OS?

Following are the Linux Platforms supported & officially listed in Siebel 8 Requirement Doc:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Siebel Gateway Name Server
PIII XEON @ 500 MHz with 256 MB memory
Siebel Server
PIII XEON with two processors @ 500MHz with 1 GB memory
Web Server
PIII XEON @ 500 MHz with 512 MB memory
Database Server As recommended by DB vendor
Oracle Enterprise Linux 4 Siebel
Gateway Name Server
PIII XEON @ 500 MHz with 256 MB memory
Siebel Server
PIII XEON with two processors @ 500MHz with 1 GB memory
Web Server
PIII XEON @ 500 MHz with 512 MB memory
Database Server As recommended by DB vendor
Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9
Siebel Gateway Name Server
PIII XEON @ 500 MHz with 256 MB memory
Siebel Server
PIII XEON with two processors @ 500MHz with 1 GB memory
Web Server
PIII XEON @ 500 MHz with 512 MB memory
Database Server As recommended by DB vendor
Regards,
Shalabhsneha

Hardware requirement for Oracle Universal Content Management

Hi Experts,
What are the Hardware requirements for Oracle Universal Content Management ?
Regards
Nasir

does this help?
Oracle WebLogic Server 11g (10.3.3) System Requirements
Oracle WebLogic Server supports a number of platforms including:
– Linux
– Sun Solaris
– HP-UX
– Windows 2000, 2003 Server, XP
• Processor:
– At least one 1 GHz CPU is recommended.
– Intel and UNIX processors are supported.
• Hard disk drive:
– A full installation requires approximately 2 GB of disk space.
– The Linux value for file descriptors must be 4096 or greater.
– Samples are optional (download from OTN).
• Memory:
– A minimum of 2 GB RAM is recommended for WebLogic
Server.
– Consider the number of simultaneous users and sessions.
– Consider in-memory programs, such as Coherence.
System Requirements
The following are some of the basic system requirements for Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.3:
• The Oracle WebLogic Server installer requires a Java Runtime Environment (JRE) to run.
Oracle WebLogic Server is certified with JDK6.0. As part of the installation, it gives the option
to install the JRockit JDK 6.0 version. As part of postinstallation, prefix the bin directory of
the JDK to the PATH environment variable.
• The Oracle WebLogic Server installer requires a temporary location in which to unpack the
files. Typically, the installer requires approximately 2.5 times the amount of temporary space
that is required by the installed files.
Note: In this release of WebLogic Server, users can choose which components of WebLogic Server
they use. Specifically, this release allows users to choose whether the Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB),
Java Message Service (JMS), and J2CA services are started when WebLogic Server is started. The
benefit of excluding some services is reduced memory footprint and reduced startup time.

Minumum hardware requirement for Siebel Document server?

what is the minimum hardware requirement for Siebel document server?

To install the Document Server, perform the following steps:
Obtain the required hardware.
Install the Siebel Server.
Install third-party applications.
After installing the Siebel Server, you may have to follow some of the steps described in Configuring the Document Server. The Document Server is a component of Siebel eDocuments, which can be installed during installation of the Siebel Server. Consult with your system administrator to verify that the Document Server has been installed and configured according to the requirements listed in the following sections.
Hardware Requirements
The Document Server is supported on the Windows 2000 platform. To maintain stability and performance, the Document Server must run on a dedicated host machine. The Siebel Server on this machine should host one instance of the Siebel eDocuments component group. No other components should be running other than required system components.
To support more users, you can run additional instances of the Siebel eDocuments component group on additional dedicated host machines.
Installing the Siebel Server
Install the Siebel Server on the dedicated host machine of the Document Server. For more information about installing the Siebel Server, see Siebel Server Installation Guide for Microsoft Windows.
During installation, you will have the option to enable component groups. Select the Siebel eDocuments component group. Do not enable any other component groups.
This step can also be performed after installation is complete, as described in the section Enabling the Component Group.
Installing Third-Party Applications
You must install Microsoft Word.
To install Microsoft Office
Log on to the server machine using the same user account that the Siebel Server NT service uses. This user account must belong to the Administrators group.
NOTE: The install must use the same account to be used by the NT Service. The installer configures COM security settings so that the installing user account will have the correct permissions to access and launch the application. If the install uses an account other than the Siebel Server NT service account, errors may occur when the Document Server tries to launch the application.
Install Microsoft Office using a Typical, or complete, installation. Verify that your version of Microsoft Office will install the Web Authoring Tools (HTML) component with the Typical installation. If it does not, you will need to use the Custom installation option, and install all of the typical components as well as the Web Authoring Tools (HTML) component.
Start the applications that will be used by the Document Server. This forces the applications to register themselves.
Close the applications.
Regards,
Joseph Arul Dass

Hardware recommendation for a real-time camera

Hi All,
We are interested in using some cameras with LabVIEW real-time for some data acquisition. We are monitoring quite a large array of points for on/off signals (so a camera is easier to implement than an array of photodiodes). Our initial spec is a CCD, 640x480 chip and about 15fps. I'm guessing firewire or Gig-E as the interface as I've heard USB is not compatible with real-time.
Our plan is to develop the application to run under LabVIEW real-time on a PXI platform. We also hope to eventually deploy the system so we'd prefer not to use NI Vision (I'm not sure if this is possible or not). Similarly due to cost we'd prefer not to use the Embedded/Compact Vision Systems if we can avoid it.
Can anyone recommend a camera which they have used with LabVIEW real-time? I have no real experience with RT as yet so any advise at all would be a great help.
We are also hoping to deploy the system using a cRIO as the main hardware platform. I've seen real-time cRIOs (http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/208042) have Gig-E built in. Has anyone used a Gig-E camera directly with one of these controllers?
Thanks for your help,
Dave

Hello DeltaJ,
Can I suggest that you contact the UK branch by calling 01635 523545 and request that you speak to you local Inside Sales Representative. They will be able to speak to you further regarding your full systems specifications and suggest which NI products will be best for you.
With regards,
Message Edited by Philip.k on 03-09-2010 05:27 AM
Philip
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
UK Branch
===If this fixes your problem, mark as solution!===

Hardware platform for running JDeveloper

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for