HSRP Interface Tracking on ATM Sub-Interface?

I want to enable HSRP interface tracking to monitor an ATM sub-interface. As I understand it, when using the (standby 1 track <interface>) command, the HSRP group priority will be decremented only if the line protocol goes down on the interface being tracked. For this reason I need to track an ATM sub-interface (i.e. atm1/0.77). I am wondering if this will work properly. Has anyone ever used this configuration successfully?

Hi Friend,
I find no reason why it should not work?
When it work for serial subinterface and frame relay interfces it should also work for atm subinterface.
I have implemented in serial subinterface.
Yes it should work fine. Go ahead and implement and update the status.
Regards,
Ankur

Similar Messages

HSRP Interface Tracking Question

I have a pair of 7206 routers for Internet access. The Internet was provided over OC3, and used interface POS1/0. I just upgraded the Internet to Ethernet so now the interface is GigabitEthernet 0/3.
I just discovered that there there is another interface that uses POS1/0 as an HSRP tracking interface. So my question is: Can I just remove the old tracking interface and add the new one? Or is there another prefered method to do this?
My current HSRP interface:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.21
description INET
encapsulation dot1Q 21
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.240
ip broadcast-address x.x.x.x
no ip redirects
ip accounting output-packets
ip flow ingress
ip nbar protocol-discovery
no snmp trap link-status
standby 1 ip x.x.x.x
standby 1 priority 105
standby 1 preempt
standby 1 track POS1/0
Thanks!
Ray

Ray
While it is correct that you can just change the HRP interface to track the Ethernet interface be aware that it may not work quite the same way. With POS and most serial interface implementations if communications with the peer is lost then the loss of keepalives will change the interface state to line protocol down and that is what the interface tracking is looking for. However with an Ethernet interface if you lose communication with the peer the interface may still be in a line protocol up state. In that circumstance interface tracking will not detect the problem.
HTH
Rick

HSRP / interface tracking and not only

Hi All,
HSRP provides nice feature of tracking an external interface, while taking decision with regard to active HSRP router election.
What I would like to ask you is as follows:
In my network all routing decisions are based on Layer2 protocol (NSAP addresses in ATM). On a top of this, I have pure IP network without any dynamic routing protocol (neither OSPF nor BGP is not supported on ATM boxes). Now I would like to bring ATM interface down for a gateway, which does not work as an active HSRP router.
As I mentioned before Layer2 takes a decision for traffic a traffic flow. Im afraid under certain circumstances traffic may hit ATM interface attached the standby router. So what next? Wont be properly routed via HSRP pair. Is my understanding correct?
I would like to have activated only one ATM interface running on active HSRP router, on the standby line protocol should be down. When HSRP re-election process takes place, newly activated router becomes active and in the first order changes protocol line to active. Is that possible?
Just as a last remark, ATM interfaces are monitored (tracked) only. Standby group is configured on Ethernet ports.
Regards,
Artur

Hello Artur,
HSRP 'tracking' feature is solely to take down the 'HSRP STATUS' to up or down and it has no bearing on the actual line protocol state of the interface.
So if you desire that HSRP should bring down the ATM interface, then that is not possible. HSRP tracking would only change the 'priority' of that interface and not bring it down/up.
Let me know if i understood and answered your question correctly,

Keeping track of focused sub...subcomponents

How can a container keep track of whether any of its descendent components gets focus?
For example, we do
         container1.add(container2);
         container2.add(component);and somewhere else call
        component.requestFocus();How can container1 find out when component gets focus?
In 1.4.0 one can listen on the KeyboardFocusManager for changes in focus, but I need a solution that also works in 1.1.8.
Thanks,
dog

Isn't there an event type for gaining focus?
Yeah, here it is: java.awt.event.FocusListener.
Perhaps the ancestor component can create a FocusListener and add it to its descendant components' FocusListener lists.

How do I track down which (sub)VI is using all of my CPU resources?

Hi,
I'm having some trouble debugging a project...
Problem:
Every once in a while, all my Vi's in the project seem to freeze up or execute extremely slow. The machine's CPU load rises to 100% (99% for the LabVIEW.exe process). The normal CPU load with the application running is around 10-15%.
Windows and LabVIEW are still responsive, albeit very sluggish. I can run the "Performance and memory" tool but I can't find any abnormalities.
Question:
Is there a way to find out what's causing the high CPU load? For example by showing the CPU load per VI in memory.
Any input is appreciated.
Kind regards,
Pieter-Jan

Thank you all for the replies. I was out of the office last week and didn't get a chance to reply untill now.
My first thought was also a loop with no timing in it, like billco suggested. The problem is finding which loop is causing the problem, as six seperate loops run continuously and make a wide variety of subVI calls, some static, some dynamic.
@altenbach: The profiler will only show VI's that have started and terminated execution. This means that if I start the profiler when the applicaton has already frozen, I can see very little happening.
I could start the profiler before starting any of the VIs, but the problem usually only occurs after hours or days of running. And when it freezes, I can nolonger shut it down properly.
I have attached two logs of the profiler: One during normal operation and one while the application was 'hanging'.
@crossrulz: I've checked memory usage in the task manager, and it is not excessive.
The project is a bit large to post here (around 300 VIs).
Also, the total CPU load goes up to 100%, but when I tested with a single untimed loop I can only get it to go up to 50% because it's a dual core machine and a single loop can only take over one of the processor cores. This makes me question the theory of the untimed loop...
Any ideas?
Attachments:
ProfileData_Hanging.txt ‏446 KB
ProfileData_Normal.txt ‏443 KB

HSRP track interface (ASR9k v4.2.3)

Hi all,
I was trying to configure the track interface command within hsrp, and when I apply the command the priority group decrement immediately.
Before of apply the configuration:
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9010-LAB-MACUL#sh hsrp bvi 600
Thu Sep 12 14:04:07.548 UTC
                       P indicates configured to preempt.
                       |
Interface      Grp Pri P State   Active addr     Standby addr   Group addr
BV600            1 110 P Active local           200.10.10.3    200.10.10.1
Then, I apply track interface:
router hsrp
interface BVI600
address-family ipv4
   hsrp 1 version 1
    timers 1 3
    preempt
    priority 110
    address 200.10.10.1
    track GigabitEthernet0/3/0/26 20
And priority decrement:
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9010-LAB-MACUL#sh hsrp bvi 600
Thu Sep 12 14:05:20.302 UTC
                       P indicates configured to preempt.
                       |
Interface      Grp Pri P State   Active addr     Standby addr   Group addr
BV600            1 90 P Standby 200.10.10.3     local          200.10.10.1
Why priority decrement if the interface is always up?
Regards.

No. That´s why I am asking why the priority decrement if the interface is always UP.
Look:
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9010-LAB-MACUL#sh inter gi 0/3/0/26
Fri Sep 13 10:41:55.907 UTC
GigabitEthernet0/3/0/26 is up, line protocol is up
Without track command:
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9010-LAB-MACUL#sh hsrp bvi 600
Fri Sep 13 10:42:30.411 UTC
                       P indicates configured to preempt.
                       |
Interface      Grp Pri P State   Active addr     Standby addr   Group addr
BV600            1 110 P Active local           200.10.10.3    200.10.10.1
After I apply track command:
router hsrp
interface BVI600
address-family ipv4
   hsrp 1 version 1
    timers 1 3
    preempt
    priority 110
    address 200.10.10.1
track GigabitEthernet0/3/0/26 20
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9010-LAB-MACUL#sh inter gi 0/3/0/26
Fri Sep 13 10:44:28.498 UTC
GigabitEthernet0/3/0/26 is up, line protocol is up
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9010-LAB-MACUL#sh hsrp bvi 600
Fri Sep 13 10:44:43.139 UTC
                       P indicates configured to preempt.
                       |
Interface      Grp Pri P State   Active addr     Standby addr   Group addr
BV600            1 90 P Standby 200.10.10.3     local          200.10.10.1

How to determine the mac address of an ATM interface

Hi All,
I have a router with an SHDSL controller. I am doing some troubleshooting and there seems to be an ip address conflict on the layer 2 shdsl network.
I am trying to figure the mac address of my atm sub interface. An ip address is set on the controller.
interface ATM0/0/0.1 point-to-point
Does someone know the command for finding it?
sh arp does not show the interface itself.
Can you please help.

Invalid command
#sh atm ?
arp-server          ATM ARP Server Table
bundle              ATM bundle information
class-links         ATM vc-class links
ilmi-configuration Display Top level ILMI
ilmi-status         Display ATM Interface ILMI information
interface           Interfaces and ATM information
map                 ATM static mapping
pvc                 ATM PVC information
route               ATM route
traffic             ATM statistics
vc                  ATM VC information
vp                  ATM VP information
The command is not available :(

Tracking ATM PVC enabled with MPLS

We are trying to identify a method where the ATM sub-interface enabled with Mpls shows line protocol UP but the ip reachability to the other side of the PVC is not there due to some issues in the ATM backbone.
Can we would be able to use the track 1 interface ip routing would help us . If so ,when it identifies the ip reachability on the PVC is done,will it log into the router or can it send to the management station. We are trying to deploy the same in 7600 switches running 12.2(18)SXF4.
Thanks
Regards
Anantha Subramanian Natarajan

You may want to think of using OAM for PVC management. As it sends Loopback cell echoes between the end points and upon failure to receive the configured Echo Cell replies it brings the corresponding PVC down.
This may as well prevent blackholing of the traffic till the OSPF adjacency is bought down due to the failure.
Here is a link on this feature:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/121/oam.html
HTH-Cheers,
Swaroop

ACE - show ft track detail - don't show 'hsrp' info

Hi,
I tried configure FT tracking by HSRP group configured on MSFC:
ft track hsrp HSRP-01
track-hsrp hsrp-Vl26-0
priority 100
peer priority 150
and verify it:
ace-lab/Admin# sh ft track ?
<1-255> Please enter FT Group ID
detail Display FT Track detail
status Display FT Track status
summary Display FT Track summary
ace-lab/Admin# sh ft track detail
FT Group : 1
Status : in-service
Maintenance mode : MAINT_MODE_OFF
My State : FSM_FT_STATE_ACTIVE
My Config Priority : 100
My Net Priority : 100
My Preempt : Enabled
Context Name : FE
Context Id : 5
...but I didn't get no information about 'hsrp'. by cisco documentation I'll get something like this:
Track type : TRACK_HSRP
HSRP Group Name : test
State: TRACK_DOWN (HSRP Group is Standby on the Supervisor)
Priority : 20
Transitions : 1
I did something wrong, or it's a bug? (I didn't find any bug with this symptoms)
ACE version: Version 3.0(0)A1(3b)
martin

By the following example I am demonstrating tracking configuration for an HSRP group on the active member of an FT group.
ft track hsrp TRACK_HSRP_GRP1
track-hsrp HSRP_GRP1
priority 50
In the above configuration example, if the HSRP_GRP1 group goes down, the ACE reduces the priority of the FT group on the active member by 50. If at any time the priority of the FT group on the active member falls below the priority of the FT group on the standby member, a switchover occurs.

Cisco 3925 router with an ATM E3 card that never goes down!

Hi all,
We a Cisco 3925 router with an ATM E3 card (NM-1A-T3/E3) configured as below with 1 PVC. we see that the ATM subinterface we created for the PVC never goes down! not even when the WAN link is down! The problem with this is we are tracking the line protocol of the ATM sub interface to have VRRP failover to standby router. But because of this issue only BGP goes down whenever the WAN is down & line-protocol of the Subinterface remains up, the failover never happens & site is down. We can configure VRRP to track reachability of a BGP route as workaround but I would like an explanation or troubleshooting steps to check whats the trouble with current setup?
Cisco IOS Software, C3900 Software (C3900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(2)T4.1, MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOFTWARE
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 30-Aug-11 08:44 by prod_rel_team
card type e3 1
interface ATM1/0
description Link to PE
mtu 1500
bandwidth 34010
no ip address
no ip proxy-arp
logging event subif-link-status
no atm ilmi-keepalive
no atm enable-ilmi-trap
end
interface ATM1/0.101 point-to-point
description PVC to MPLS PE
mtu 1500
bandwidth 2500
ip address a.b.c.d 255.255.255.252
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow monitor FMforIP4in sampler ata1to100 input
ip flow monitor FMforIP4out sampler ata1to100 output
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
no atm enable-ilmi-trap
snmp trap link-status
pvc 1/101
vbr-nrt 8192 8192 1
vc-hold-queue 2048
oam-pvc manage
oam retry 3 5 1
oam ais-rdi 15 3
encapsulation aal5snap
protocol ip inarp
queue-depth 5 3
service-policy out Edge_Queueing
end
Thanks a lot in advance!

Your router has some configuration on it already and it would help us give you better advice if we knew what is already in the configuration. So would you post the output of show running-config (if there is sensitive information like addresses and passwords you can mask them out.
Changing the configuration register was a good start. I have a couple questions/observations that may help you get started. I notice what appears to be the same public IP address on Gig0/0 and on multilink. Did you get that address from your ISP? If so what kind of connection do you have to the ISP?
In your description you tell us that Gig0/0 is connected to a small switch, which I assume is for the LAN of your network. But that also is the interface where the public address is configured. So I am confused whether this interface is for LAN or for connecting to the ISP. Can you clarify this?
HTH
Rick

Can't apply service-policy to atm int?

Attempted to apply service-policy output MPLS-EGRESS to ATM Int:
class-map match-any GOLD
match mpls experimental topmost 5
match ip precedence 5
class-map match-any BRONZE
match mpls experimental topmost 3
match ip precedence 3
class-map match-any SILVER
match mpls experimental topmost 4
match ip precedence 4
policy-map MPLS-EGRESS
class GOLD
priority percent 5
set mpls experimental topmost 5
class SILVER
bandwidth percent 10
random-detect
set mpls experimental topmost 4
class BRONZE
bandwidth percent 20
random-detect
set mpls experimental topmost 3
class class-default
set mpls experimental topmost 0
fair-queue
random-detect
interface ATM4/0.102 point-to-point
description TRUNK LINK TO PE_B
bandwidth 16000
ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ip ospf message-digest-key xxx
no snmp trap link-status
mpls ip
pvc PE_B 10/102
tx-ring-limit 3
oam-pvc manage
encapsulation aal5snap
service-policy output MPLS-EGRESS
And it *appears* to apply without error, but logs show:
Jul 28 09:34:32.550 aest: %SCHED-3-SEMLOCKED: Virtual Exec attempted to lock a semaphore, already locked by itself -Traceback= 0x61317864 0x62658A88 0x620F0A4C 0x60DD3668 0x60DD5648 0x6135ABD8 0x61379744 0x62644508 0x626444EC
Jul 28 09:34:33.870 aest: I/f ATM4/0.102 VC 10/102 class GOLD requested bandwidth 0 (kbps), available only 0 (kbps)
And ATM4/0.102 does not include the service-policy output MPLS-EGRESS when I do a show run nor when I do a sho policy-map interface?

Resolved my own issue - I needed:
vbr-nrt 32000 16000
under the atm sub int...

ASR-9001 - XR_434 - HSRP

How many HSRP / Subinterfaces will be recomend to be the max in a Teng. port for an ASR-9001.
If i have over 500, what will be the configuration best practice?
I have seen Multiple Group Optimization (MGO) for HSRP as an option, but i dont have a clear example of how to configure it on XR.

In spanish ¡¡ APLAUSOS !!
Also i take a look on Struc 33 of the NP, and the max entries change from 1024 to 8192
router hsrp
interface TenGigE0/0/0/3
address-family ipv4
   hsrp 4094
    name PRINCIPAL
    priority 110
    track object PRUEBA_1 40
interface TenGigE0/0/0/3.2
address-family ipv4
   hsrp 2 slave
    follow PRINCIPAL
    address 198.18.0.1
interface TenGigE0/0/0/3.3
address-family ipv4
   hsrp 3 slave
    follow PRINCIPAL
    address 198.18.0.9
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR-9001_1#sh hsrp br
Wed Mar 25 02:13:58.791 MEX
IPv4 Groups:
                        P indicates configured to preempt.
                        |
Interface      Grp Pri P State   Active addr     Standby addr   Group addr
Te0/0/0/3      4094 70   Init    unknown         unknown        unknown
Te0/0/0/3.2       2 sla   Init    unknown         unknown        198.18.0.1
Te0/0/0/3.3       3 sla   Init    unknown         unknown        198.18.0.9
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR-9001_1#show controllers np struct 33 np0 location 0/0/CPU0
Wed Mar 25 02:14:30.375 MEX
                Node: 0/0/CPU0:
NP: 0 Struct 33: VRRP_MAC
Struct is a PHYSICAL entity
Reserved Entries: 0, Used Entries: 6, Max Entries: 8192
Tks!!!!

ASR 1002-X HRSP Object Tracking

Hello
I have the following config in place. I want to make sure my HSRP is tracking to be affective.
Please review and advise.
track 1 ip route (ISP PER ip address) 255.255.255.252 reachability
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/5
description Inside_DMZ_3750
ip address 10.27.254.3 255.255.255.0
standby 1 ip 10.27.254.1
standby 1 priority 150
standby 1 preempt
standby 2 ip 10.27.254.2
standby 2 priority 90
standby 2 preempt
speed 1000
no negotiation auto
I have tried to add standby track 1 statements to HSRP config, however they do not show in display.
   standby 1 track 1 ?
   standby track 1 ?

1 more question
I am using this track command "track 1 ip route 1.1.1.9 255.255.255.252 reachability
is there anything else I should add to this:
ASR1002x(config-track)#?
Tracking instance configuration commands:
default Set a command to its defaults
delay    Tracking delay
exit     Exit from tracking configuration mode
ip       Tracking IP configuration subcommands
no       Negate a command or set its defaults

ACE redundancy tracking and failure detection

Hello,
I have configured redundancy on a pair of ACEs, and looking now for the most approriate method of failure detection.
In the admin guide, 3 possible methodes are explained: host tracking, interface tracking and HSRP group tracking.
I don't have HSRP configured on the Supervisors in the ACEs chassis, the default gateway is on other chassis, so HSRP tracking is not an option.
The ACEs are configured in routed mode.
I have 1 VLAN with all VIPs, and 4 server VLANs.
There are 2 contexts active.
I was thinking of tracking all 5 VLAN interfaces + tracking the default gateway on client side.
Would this be a good approach?
thanks in advance for your input.

Hi ,
The ACE supports a maximum of 4,093 VLANs per system and a maximum of 1,024 shared VLANs per system.
Alos note that the ACE supports a maximum of 8,192 interfaces per system that include VLANs, shared VLANs, and BVI interfaces.
Regards,
Sachin

EEM config & Track delay

We have two iBGP peers with their own separate eBGP (Internet) peers.
We use them as an HSRP pair (over an L2 trunk) for our redundant Internet.
I've created an EEM script that will have the "secondary" router track the "primary" router's HSRP interface to ensure it's still up.
If the link goes down, the router immediately removes all of its iBGP static routes to avoid a routing black hole.
When the link comes back up, the secondary router re-adds the iBGP static routes.
The script works fine, but the maximum delay on the ip sla track command has a maximum of 180 seconds.
Since we're talking BGP, this short delay could wreak havoc if an Internet link is flapping or something.
Here's the track command:
track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
default-state up
delay down 30 up 180
I'm trying to think of a way to make it wait longer than 180 seconds. (900 seconds would be ideal to ensure the issue has been resolved before re-establishing the static routes.
Can anyone think of a way to increase the delay using the EEM commands? The track command is too limited here.
Thanks!
Ven

Looks like it's calling the add-ibgp, but it stops after the config t.
scp1001-a5t-3#
*Sep 25 15:26:23.680: %TRACKING-5-STATE: 1 ip sla 1 reachability Up->Down
*Sep 25 15:26:23.680: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : CTL : cli_open called.
*Sep 25 15:26:23.681: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3>
*Sep 25 15:26:23.681: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3>enable
*Sep 25 15:26:23.691: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3#
*Sep 25 15:26:23.691: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3#conf t
*Sep 25 15:26:23.801: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
*Sep 25 15:26:23.801: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config)#
*Sep 25 15:26:23.801: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config)#router bgp 27336
*Sep 25 15:26:23.911: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config-router)#
*Sep 25 15:26:23.911: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config-router)#neighbor 152.179.202.81 shutdown
*Sep 25 15:26:24.021: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config-router)#
*Sep 25 15:26:24.021: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config-router)#no event manager applet add-ibgp
*Sep 25 15:26:24.131: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config)#
*Sep 25 15:26:24.131: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config)#end
*Sep 25 15:26:24.138: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by EEM on vty0 (EEM:track-bgp-down)
*Sep 25 15:26:24.141: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3#
*Sep 25 15:26:24.141: %HA_EM-5-LOG: track-bgp-down: SCP iBGP static routes deleted due to vlan200 failure
*Sep 25 15:26:24.141: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-down : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : CTL : cli_close called.
*Sep 25 15:26:24.141: tty is now going through its death sequence
*Sep 25 15:26:31.530: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 163.230.254.66 Down BGP Notification sent
*Sep 25 15:26:31.530: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 163.230.254.66 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
*Sep 25 15:26:31.530: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 163.230.254.66 IPv4 Unicast topology base removed from session BGP Notification sent
*Sep 25 15:26:47.964: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1, changed state to up
*Sep 25 15:26:48.964: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1, changed state to up
*Sep 25 15:26:47.964: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: SIP0/0: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1, changed state to up
*Sep 25 15:26:49.909: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 163.230.254.66 Up
*Sep 25 15:27:23.680: %TRACKING-5-STATE: 1 ip sla 1 reachability Down->Up
*Sep 25 15:27:23.680: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : CTL : cli_open called.
*Sep 25 15:27:23.681: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3>
*Sep 25 15:27:23.681: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3>enable
*Sep 25 15:27:23.691: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3#
*Sep 25 15:27:23.691: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3#conf t
*Sep 25 15:27:23.701: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
*Sep 25 15:27:23.701: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config)#
*Sep 25 15:27:23.701: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config)#event manager applet add-ibgp
*Sep 25 15:27:23.811: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#
*Sep 25 15:27:23.811: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#event timer countdown time 300
*Sep 25 15:27:23.921: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#
*Sep 25 15:27:23.921: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#action 1.0 cli command enable
*Sep 25 15:27:24.031: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#
*Sep 25 15:27:24.031: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#action 2.0 cli command " config t"
*Sep 25 15:27:24.141: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#
*Sep 25 15:27:24.141: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#action 3.0 cli command " router bgp 27336"
*Sep 25 15:27:24.251: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#
*Sep 25 15:27:24.251: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#action 4.0 cli command " no neighbor 152.179.202.81 shutdown"
*Sep 25 15:27:24.361: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#
*Sep 25 15:27:24.361: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#action 8.0 cli command end
*Sep 25 15:27:24.471: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#
*Sep 25 15:27:24.471: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3(config-applet)#end
*Sep 25 15:27:24.474: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by EEM on vty0 (EEM:track-bgp-up)
*Sep 25 15:27:24.481: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3#
*Sep 25 15:27:24.481: %HA_EM-5-LOG: track-bgp-up: SCP iBGP static routes re-added - vlan200 UP
*Sep 25 15:27:24.481: %HA_EM-6-LOG: track-bgp-up : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : CTL : cli_close called.
*Sep 25 15:27:24.481: tty is now going through its death sequence
*Sep 25 15:27:42.058: %HSRP-5-STATECHANGE: GigabitEthernet0/0/1 Grp 1 state Speak -> Standby
*Sep 25 15:32:24.474: %HA_EM-6-LOG: add-ibgp : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : CTL : cli_open called.
*Sep 25 15:32:24.475: %HA_EM-6-LOG: add-ibgp : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3>
*Sep 25 15:32:24.475: %HA_EM-6-LOG: add-ibgp : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3>enable
*Sep 25 15:32:24.485: %HA_EM-6-LOG: add-ibgp : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : OUT : scp1001-a5t-3#
*Sep 25 15:32:24.485: %HA_EM-6-LOG: add-ibgp : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : IN : scp1001-a5t-3# config t
*Sep 25 15:32:44.500: %HA_EM-6-LOG: add-ibgp : DEBUG(cli_lib) : : CTL : cli_close called.
*Sep 25 15:32:46.496: tty is now going through its death sequence

HSRP Interface Tracking on ATM Sub-Interface?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for