I need a new 870-g45 or similarity

I have a customers Mobo (870-g45) and it is broken, I need another 870-g45 or at least similar to it so I can use the same parts.
Anyone have thoughts?
Thanx

Easier would be getting a later but very similar board with latest 970 chipset and AM3+ support which has better availability. Everything should work with it like with the 870:
>MSI 970A-G46<

Similar Messages

  • MSI 870-G45 - something odd is going on with MSI

    Ok, this is convoluted but bear with me.
    I bought the MSI 870-G45 (MS-7599 v2.x) motherboard from Newegg. Newegg listed the chipset as the AMD 870. However, when I received the motherboard, the manual states that the chipset is actually the RX 780 (a.k.a. AMD 770 a chip from 2007/08!), I checked in CPU-Z and confirmed this. I built a rig with this motherboard on 8/15/2010.
    I have been having all sorts of issues. These include memory errors when running memtest86+ or HCI memtest.
    Today I come on to the MSI website to do some research on the motherboard and I see that the MSI 870-G45 is now listed as a "NEW" product and the chipset is now the AMD 870, as I originally thought. In fact, MSI has two versions of the 870-G45, depending on what link you visit. See the two links below:
    http://www.msi.com/index.php?func=prodmbspec&maincat_no=1&cat2_no=&cat3_no=&prod_no=2070
    http://us.msi.com/index.php?func=prodmbspec&maincat_no=1&cat2_no=171&cat3_no=&prod_no=2019#menu
    The version I ended up with is the one in the first link.
    Now, I have the AMD Athlon II X4 635. The product info page at AMD states that the voltages should be between .85v and 1.25v. ( http://products.amd.com/en-gb/DesktopCPUDetail.aspx?id=625 ) However, even though the BIOS of this motherboard (the version with the 770 chipset, which is the one I got) supports this CPU, the "Auto" CPU voltage setting sets the voltage at ~1.35v - above the specs specified by AMD! Wondering if this might also be a cause of the difficulties I am having, I lowered it to 1.12. Running some more tests to see if this has improved stability.
    So, two versions of one motherboard, with confusing numbering and Auto voltage that exceeds the specs from the CPU manufacturer. What the heck is going on?
    Another issue is that the manual states on page 2-6 (21 on the PDF) states that to be in dual channel mode, I need to put my two DIMM cards in the slots DIMM1 and DIMM2. However, further down the page under the heading "Important", it states:
    In Dual-Channel mode, make sure that you install memory modules of the same type
    and density in different channel DIMM slots.
    This seems to be contradictory, but it is probably just me. Does it mean I install the two DIMMs in DIMM1 and DIMM2 or DIMM1 and DIMM3?

    Thank you both for your input. I mistakenly thought this was run by MSI. Feel stupid. But since you were so kind to respond, I'll post my full system specs as you suggested:
    AMD Athlon II X4 635 CPU
    MSI 870-G45 AM3 Motherboard
    G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (F3-12800CL9D-4GBNQ)
    GIGABYTE 1GB GeForce GTX 460
    SAMSUNG Spinpoint F3 HD103SJ 1TB 7200 RPM
    ASUS DRW-24B1ST SATA 24X DVD Burner
    OCZ ModXStream Pro OCZ600MXSP 600W ( +3.3V@25A, +5V@25A, +12V1@25A, +12V2@25A, [email protected], [email protected] )
    OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit.
    Also just discovered that there are two versions of my CPU (C2 and C3 revisions). Perhaps that is where some of the confusion regarding voltages lie. Again, feel stupid.
    Issues in a nutshell:
    Computer ran fine for about 10 days. Then booted up a game and got crazy artifacts everywhere. Windows 7 also showed some artifacts when I went back to desktop. OS never crashed though. Windows has never crashed. Because of this, I suspected that my GPU went bad. Ran OCCT GPU test, Furmark and ATI tool and have artifacts on all three. Artifacts appear immediately upon starting test, so I don't think it is temperature related. Temp of GPU is under 40 C idle and highest under load is 77 C, which falls in line with what I read in reviews for card.
    Now, before RMAing by video card with Newegg, I decided to download memtest86+ and run it. Just a hunch. I got an error on the first pass in test 2. However, I continued to run the test and saw no more errors. Ran the test again overnight for hours and could not recreate error. Thinking I may have gotten a false positive, I ran HCI Memtest (this one runs in Windows) and ran it for a few hours. That reported multiple errors as well. Now I am trying to run the test with one DIMM at a time to see if I can isolate which stick it is.
    So I guess my questions are:
    * What are the chances that I got a bad GPU and bad RAM from Newegg? Anything is possible but I thought that getting two lemons was unlikely, and when I then saw the discrepancies in the motherboard info on MSIs website I started to wonder.
    * Could bad DRAM have any effect on GPU - as in displaying artifacts. Or would this strictly be a GPU issue?
    * A member at another forum warned against leaving voltage settings in BIOS at Auto. This is what led me to look up the specs at AMDs website. What do you think about this recommendation.
    Sorry if I came off a little harsh, I thought I was addressing MSI the company and was a bit miffed by two different versions of a board and with the fact that newegg was improperly stating the specs.
    I appreciate any help you can give.

  • Pages '08 says "You need a newer version of Pages to open this document." when opening a Pages '08 Document

    Created a document 3 years ago with Pages '08.  Got a new Mac last summer, migrated my user account, reinstalled Pages '08.  Upgraded to Mavericks recently.
    Now when trying to open the document I get the message "You need a newer version of Pages to open this document." 
    Note that I have read a number of the messages here that are similar.  To be clear there is only one Pages (Pages '08) on this system.  Its in the iWork folder.
    Is it the case that this document and all the other Pages '08 documents on my system are lost forever? 
    BTW I have looked at the new version of Pages.  Its just plain awful from UX to quality.  What has gone wrong at Apple and specifically in the iWork group in the past few years???
    Thanks for any help!
    K
    And in trying to post this I got the "You are not allowed to create or update this content"  Changed the Community from what was automatically selected and seems to work now.  Whats with Apple Engineering and QA these days??? 

    I've never had Pages 5 on my system.  Just to confirm I copied the file to a USBDrive and gave it to a friend to try out.  He has Pages 5 on a new MBP with latest Mavericks.  When he tried to open it he got the following message:
    "You document will open in the new Pages for Mac.  If you save it or edit it, you'll need the latest Pages on iOS7 to open it on an iOS device."
    But it did open on his system.  He closed it, no save, and reopened but did not get the above message again.
    We concluded that the file is actually a Pages '08 file because of the above message.
    However we also suspect that when this file was simply opened in Pages 5.2.2 on his system it got flagged and possibly converted which is actually quite offensive!
    Thoughts/Advice?

  • When I plug my iPhone 4s into my PC, I get an error message that says iTunes needs a newer version of Apple Mobile Device Support. It wants me to uninstall both the AMDS and iTunes and then reinstall iTunes. Has anyone else run into this problem recently?

    When I plug my iPhone 4s into my PC, I get a message that says iTunes needs a newer version of Apple Mobile Device Support. It wants me to uninstall both the AMDS and iTunes and then reinstall iTunes. iTunes won't recognize my phone and so I can't synch it. Has anyone else run into this problem recently and how did you resolve it? Thanks!

    Thank you both. I suppose I should have prefaced my question with the concern that I've read a number of other posts from people who have had a similar issue and when they tried to follow the directions, they ran into a multitude of other problems. As you might imagine, I'm hoping to avoid the creation of new problems as I try to solve this one. Thanks again.

  • We need a new section entitled:  Issues With Apple Customer Service

    "This Feedback about the Discussions forum is intended for questions about how to use Apple Discussions and for general constructive feedback about how the Discussions system is operating or how it may be improved. Please use this forum appropriately. Failure to do so may result in your posting privileges to this forum being disabled.
    If your question concerns a hardware or software technical issue, please do not post in this forum — instead, go to the Apple Discussions Homepage, select an appropriate product category and follow the links until you reach the correct forum for your post, then click the Post New Topic link. "
    Alright, I have a suggestion for improvement. We need a new forum section for complaints about the way Apple is treating us.
    To make sure I'm being clear, let me give you an example of just such a post that may be included in such a section.
    I ordered online the family packs of Leopard, iWork '08 and iLife '08 on November 6th. I received an email telling me my order had been shipped on November 7th.
    On November 9th I decided to check the progress of my shippment by logging on to FedEx. To my surprise, it had been delivered! Not to me but another party. I could download a PDF from FedEx and see the signature.
    After trying to deal with FedEx for a few days I was finally told to deal with Apple because they would have to initiate the investigation. Fine. These things happen.
    On 11/13/2007 I spoke with an Apple Customer Service Representative and received an Apple Issue Number and Case Number. I was told that it should be resolved in a few days. It wasn't.
    11/20/2007, Here's where it gets interesting. In talking with them again I explained that since my signature was not on the FedEx ticket it had not been delivered properly if at all. I explained that since FedEx was clearly at fault the package should be shipped again. Finally they agreed. I was told that my package would be shipped and to expect an email.
    11/23/2007, I was told again that nothing would be shipped until after an investigation had been completed. So did they lie? I spoke with a manager who kept repeating that he was sorry for the mis-communication. That became very frustrating to say the least. Remember, FedEx requires a signature. Without it or my permission to deliver somewhere else they must deliver to me and get my signature. The FedEx PDF clearly shows another persons signature.
    Equally frustrating is the fact that they will not keep me informed as to the status. I have to call them and wait on hold. I did get a couple of emails with text along the lines of, "We continue to work with our carrier on your lost package. "
    However, there is no way to reply to these form letters. The only way to stay in touch with Apple is to call and be put on hold.
    Twice, after giving them my order number and being put on hold "while they look up my records" or whatever, the call was disconnected. I'm not saying they did so on purpose but the results were the same. Another call, another round of giving my order number and explaining to yet again a new person the details of the situation.
    I've had many problems with Apple since becoming a customer in June of 2006 but I just can't let this go. I need a place to warn others. If you buy something, you might be better off buying it from a store instead of on-line. This kind of information is needed to warn others concerning the business practices of Apple should something go wrong. This is why we need a new section for putting forth such complaints.

    It seems to me that the real problem here is with FedEx, as I have encountered similar types of problems with them in the past. Even though a signature is required, I have had packages left on my porch. When I enquired, someone had actually signed (i.e.forged) my name! Other times it has been left on my porch with some other signature. When I call to complain, FedEx just seems to think there is no problem as long as I got my package. They seem totally unconcerned even though a signature is required and I definitely did not authorize delivery with no signature. I have expressed my concerns directly to Apple, but have no way of knowing if it has done any good. I think this problem is worse with FedEx ground, as that is contracted out. Around here anyway, i think the drivers will sign the ticket and leave the package just so they won't have to make another trip. It's not right, and it's not supposed to happen this way, but i know it does.
    Apple entrusted your package to FedEx in good faith that it would be delivered to you, and that your signature would be required for you to receive it. That should have resulted in you receiving it. however, due to a false signature, you did not. Clearly, FedEx is responsible.
    If the package was supposedly delivered to your address, but has a false signature, I wonder if the driver might have signed the delivery ticket or gotten someone else to sign it and just left it on your porch or something like that. If so, it could have been subsequently stolen. If something like this happened, it might explain why things are so bogged down in the investigation at Apple. From their viewpoint, the package was delivered and a signature was obtained and they are probably being stonewalled by FedEx.
    A user to user discussion forum such as Apple Discussions won't help with delivery problems. It's best to report them directly to Apple as you have done. If you continue to have problems, you can call Apple and ask to speak to Apple Customer Relations. They may well be able to cut through the red tape. You could also express your concern in the "Feedback to Apple" section. Maybe if enough people complain, they might consider awarding the shipping contract to someone else. Or perhaps the other shippers are even worse.
    One of my recent shipments was evidently lost in a typhoon. But when I called Apple, a replacement was sent out immediately. This is more what I would expect of Apple, and you have every right to expect similar treatment.
    If FedEx delivered to the wrong address and got a wrong signature, they should be expected to go back and retrieve the package. But if they delivered to your address and did not get your signature, then you would be well within your rights to go to your local Better Business Bureau and file a complaint against FedEx. That might possibly get some action of some sort. FedEx cannot ignore the BBB as easily as they can ignore you. If your signature was actually forged, you will certainly be able to prove that the signature on the delivery ticket is definitely not yours. And you could forward the BBB complaint to Apple. I don't know if this would help or just muddy the water, but it would put a little more pressure on FedEx I would think.
    In the meantime, I would certainly speak to Apple Customer Relations and see if they can help you out here. They want happy Apple customers, and I think they would like to know about the extreme frustrations you are experiencing through no fault of your own.
    I sympathize with your problems, and I hope that you are able to get them resolved soon.
    Good luck!

  • "Macintosh HD could not be repaired"... Do I need a new hard drive?

    So my macbook pro when I turn it on goes straight to the apple screen like normal, then it just sits there and loads forever.
    I then booted it with the Disk Utility and tried Verifying and Repairing the disk (I selected my hard drive). The repair couldn't be completed and it said that "The volume Macintosh HD could not be repaired." I tried it a couple times with the same result.
    Then I booted in Safe Mode and ran the "fsck -fy" in which I got a series of errors in response. The following is what I got back:
    "Invalid leaf record count
    (It should be 283 instead of 287)
    **Checking catalog file.
    Invalid sibling link
    (4, 26092)
    **Rebuilding catalog B-tree.
    **The volume Macintosh HD could not be repaired."
    I did a little bit of research on similar problems and everything has said that the hard drive is crashed and that I will need a new one.
    Suggestions said to clone the hard drive to hopefully not use the files but that ultimately I need to buy a new one from The Apple Store.
    Does anyone have any input as to how I should go about fixing this, keeping the files, and maybe not having to buy a new hard drive? Or what do I need to do to go about having a running computer?

    I don't believe that the evidence you have presented necessarily indicates a physical failue of the drive; neither does it disprove it. What we do know is that crucial data structures on the disk have been corrupted.
    Ideally, you have a current backup of your data (could be via Time Machine, disk cloning software, and/or online backup; multiple backups would be even better). If so, try reformatting the drive (while booted from your recovery partition if your system is new enough or the disks that came with your older system), reinstalling the system, and restoring from the backup. That should suffice if there is no hardware problem and your backups were from before the corruption.
    Let us know if that helps. If you need further assistance, please let us know the model and year of your MacBook Pro and the version of [Mac] OS X you have been running on it.

  • Why does Numbers say I need a newer version when I am using the latest version

    I am getting the error message "You need a newer version of Numbers to open this file". However, this is a file I created yesterday with this version of numbers.
    What gives ? If I ck my numbers version it says no updates available.

    Hi Steve,
    This is confusing to a lot of people. When you downloaded the new version of Numbers the old version remained on your Mac. The new version is in Applications. The old version is in a subfolder within Applications. The icons look similar so it's easy to think you're trying to open a document with the new version whereas in fact the old version has been activated and is trying to open it.
    If you tend to open documents from Finder then right-click and Open With ... Numbers.app (3.0).
    Or you can open Numbers 3.0 (the one in the Applications folder, not the iWork '09 subfolder) and open the document from there.
    Any icons you had on the Dock before the upgrade are of course still pointing to the old version.
    SG

  • New lot-sizing procedure (similar FX fixed order quantity)

    Dear All,
    I have to create a new lot sizing procedure for MRP run. This new procedure should be similar to FX - the material should be included in MRP run when the stock falls below reorder point - but the quantity ordered (proposed to be ordered in PReq) should be the fixed lot size no matter which is the difference between the reorder point and the stock.
    To clarify the request: the reorder point is 70, the stock level is 15 and the fixed lot size is 25. The MRP run should create 1 PReq for 25. (The standard functionality of FX lot sizing creates 3 PReq for 25 pieces each one - because the needed quantity is 55.)
    If there is no standard customization to be done, I think I should do some changes in the needed quantity (set the quantity 25 instead of 55) - but I need yours advice also about the best way to do this. Maybe you may indicate an exit/BADI or a place where I can do an enhancement to achieve this.
    I now it is not the best request - but I have to do it, unfortunately .
    Regards,
    Florina R.

    Hi Tomasz,
    1) The reorder point is 70 (greater than the needed quantity for a week) because the vendor has some delivery problems and also because this quantity covers the delivery lead time.
    2) The lot size is fixed because they do not want to order more than the needed quantity for a week even if the difference between the reorder point and the stock level is greater than 25.
    I'm able to fix the lot size but not to limit the quantity at this value (25).
    I have to do this because they will provide the needed quantity (if the stock falls to 0) from another vendor (but the tricky thing and wrong also is the fact that for the second vendor I have a second material....).
    It is hard for me to convince you that the request is correct because I know in this way SAP will work incorrectly - but the client knows the consequences and even so wants this kind of lot sizing procedure...
    Regards,
    Florina R.

  • My account has been disabled, i dont need a new password as i already did that, i just need my account to be enabled, do any body know how to do this?

    my account has been disabled, i dont need a new password as i already did that, i just need my account to be enabled, do anybody know how to do this?

    It was a genuine email from iTunes, not a phishing attempt trying to get your account and payment details ?
    Viewing your account's purchase history : See your purchase history in the iTunes Store - Apple Support (on an iOS device you can view the last 90 days purchases via http://reportaproblem.apple.com)
    Phishing and similar emails : Phishing & Other Suspicious Emails
    Phishing emails : Identifying fraudulent "phishing" email - Apple Support
    Genuine iTunes emails : Identifying legitimate emails from the iTunes Store - Apple Support
    If it's a genuine email and it shows on your account's purchase history then contact iTunes Support : http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/ - click on Contact iTunes Store Support on the right-hand side of the page, then Purchases, Billing & Redemption . And change your account's password e.g. by logging into it via the Store > View Account menu on your computer's iTunes, or via http://appleid.apple.com
    If it is a phishing email then forward it to Apple : [email protected] , and then delete it.

  • Trying to open a number file it tells me i need a newer version i created it on this computer with numbers what do i need to do

    I am trying to open a file in numbers that I created in numbers but when I try it tells me that I need a newer version of numbers to  open.  I have version "09 2.3(554) and I have checked to see if there are any updates and I can not find any.  What do I need to do to open the file?
    Carol

    Carol,
    In Finder, Right-Click or Ctrl-Click the filename and choose Open With: Numbers 3.
    If you get the error you mentioned, it's almose always because you are inadvertently trying to open the docuement with the old version. It's easy to make that mistake because the icons look similar and of course the names are similar too.
    Jerry

  • I can open some older numbers files but not others. I get a message that says I need a newer version of numbers.

    I can open some older numbers files but not other. I get a message saying I need a new version of numbers. Why would some files open and not others?

    SK,
    Here's the deal. If you ever open a Numbers file with Version 3, the file is converted to Version 3 and can't be opened again by Version 2. Version 2 and Version 3 are undoubtedly both on your machine and they look so similar that you may not realize which you are using. So, there are two steps to getting into trouble.
    1. Open a Numbers 2 file with Numbers 3, edit it and Close it.
    2. Try to open that file with Version 2. You ill get the error.
    To always get it right, find the file you want to open in Finder, Right-Click it and choose Open With... and pick Version 3 from the drop down list.
    If you have a file that you prefer to use only in Version 2, always use Open with... Numbers 2.3.
    Jerry

  • No sound on 870-g45

    Recently purchased MSI 870-g45, a quad core chip, 4 gigs ram, and new fan.
    installed all of it and started my computer up.
    i'm running windows 7.
    i get no sound from the back plugs, i can get sound from the front headset plugs.
    i find no software on the disc to control the sound options.
    i have tried all 3 options for sound drivers, and none of them give me anything. The creative option tells me no drivers found.
    I have no idea what option i should be using, creative, realtek or via.
    none of them are working for me.
    does anyone have any ideas?

    what os you're running? 32bit ? 64bit?
    do you use msi drivers?
    http://eu.msi.com/index.php?func=downloaddetail&type=driver&maincat_no=1&prod_no=2070

  • I Need A Newer Version of HotSync

    Hi, I have a Palm Treo 650 (cingular/now AT&T) device that has HotSync version 5.4.0 on the device.  My laptop has HotSync Manager Version 6.0.1 and Windows XP Pro.  I need to download a third-party software application on my Treo and they specify that the device must have HotSync version 6.X or later.  My question is do I need a newer version of HotSync on my Treo?  If so do I need to download from Palm a new version to my laptop?  I looked up the available downloads from Palm but it appears they only offer a full version of the program rather than a simple upgrade.  Any thoughts?  Not sure why there is a difference between the versions of HotSync on the Treo vs the laptop. 
    Post relates to: Treo 650 (Cingular)

    While I am using a different device - Treo 680 (AT&T) - I am in a similar situation, and it sounds as though I may work for the same company. 
    I've got Hotsync 7.0.2 on my laptop (running Vista) and Hotsync 5.4.0 running on my device.  The sycning works fine in all areas (I've test-installed other third-party apps to verify), but the particular set of apps given by our company doesn't play nice with anything less than Hotsync 6.x on the device.   They did list as much on the spec requirements, but after not being able to find an upgrade/update, I figured it was worth a shot.  No errors, just that the apps simply don't install.
    At any rate, I have personally seen people running our company's apps on their Palm 680's, so now I'm wondering-
    If there isn't any way to update the device's Hotsync version, why/how are their different versions of Hotsync out there on the different devices of the same model?  Did they start shipping them with a newer version and I got an old one?
    I'm just frustrated, because I know it's possible to have a 680 with Hotsync 6.x on it, ye I've been fruitlessly searching for days.
    Post relates to: Treo 680 (AT&T)
    Edit: Oh, and yes, I've already installed the ROM update to software version "Treo680-2.11-ATT"
    Message Edited by ePants on 04-30-2008 07:02 AM

  • 870-G45 won't post

    Specs below. I get all 4 leds on, all fans spinning, etc. Monitor only shows a "_" and won't do anything past that. Does recognize that a keyboard is plugged in though.
    MSI 870-G45 AM3 AMD 770 ATX AMD Motherboard
    AMD Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition Callisto 3.2GHz Socket AM3 80W Dual-Core Desktop Processor
    EVGA 512-P3-1240-LR GeForce GT 240 512MB 128-bit DDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card
    SAMSUNG Spinpoint F3 HD502HJ 500GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive
    G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory Model F3
    OCZ Fatal1ty OCZ550FTY 550W ATX12V v2.2 / EPS12V SLI Ready 80 PLUS Certified Modular Active PFC Power Supply
    LIAN LI Lancool PC-K58W

    Quote from: Henry on 10-September-10, 10:14:25
    3 pin power LED JFP2 pins 1 & 5.
    Whoops, don't know how I skipped over that in the manual, thanks.
    Still need help with the other issue though. Just to add, it did this the very first time I booted up, I do not have Windows or any OS installed because I cannot get past that screen.

  • MSI 870-G45 Checking NVRAM Hang

    I just built a new computer, and it often hangs when restarting by doing one of two things.
    1. It hangs at "Checking NVRAM" right after the HDD's are detected.
    2. The motherboard beeps 4 times, and then says a BIOS update has been requested via USB. It does a little routine checking for a USB and then telling me I haven't inserted a USB 3 times before it automatically restarts the computer. Sometimes it'll beep 4 times again and do the same thing, sometimes it'll go into the "Checking NVRAM" error, and sometimes it'll boot fine.
    Essentially, it's hit-or-miss if it'll hang or not on either of those. I'd say about 80% of the time it does.
    Here's my specs:
    Antec Three Hundred Case
    Antec Truepower New 750W Modular Power Supply
    MSI 870-G45 Motherboard
    AMD Athlon II X2 255 CPU
    Corsair VS2GB1333D3 2GB DDR3-1333 RAM (in the first slot)
    ASUS Radeon HD 5450 Silent 1GB PCI-E Video Card
    2 x DVD drives
    6 x SATA drives
    Here's what I've tried so far:
    1. Disconnect everything except memory & video card
    2. Boot motherboard out of the case
    3. Reset CMOS via the jumper and by removing the battery
    4. Flash BIOS with the newest version
    Any ideas?

    Fredrik, sorry but it's not nVidia ram
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-volatile_random-access_memory

Maybe you are looking for

  • Dead Ipod photo

    Hello, Since last few days my Ipod Photo is dead. It does not start. Earlier I connected to my Macbook and it started so I formatted and now it does not. When i connect to AC adapter, it still showing "connect to ac supply" icon. I think it is not ab

  • HT1766 i tried to update phone now its wont turn on

    I updated my phone as requested by itunes and now it won't turn on and asks me to restore to original settings.  The photo is itunes with a cord

  • Duplicate rows in workspace

    One of my users made some "adjustments" (still not fully sure what he did) to a workspace in our production database. Another user then went into the same workspace and made over 100 changes. When attempting to merge, ORA-0001 unique constraint error

  • I can't move multiple pictures into an album

    I have been using iPhoto for years and just upgraded to iLife. Now I can only move pictures into an album one at a time. If I select more that one, nothing happens. Any suggestions?

  • Program will not run

    installed IPOD and ITUNES software from disk, upgraded from website and still can't launch either itunes or quick time. It acts like it is loading then just aborts with no error message. trying for 3 days to get it to work.....