Idoc failure due to movement type

Hello,
I am going through one process in whih i am recieving idoc from another system into SAP and this idoc will result in doing GR automatically.
This time IDoc is getting failed and system showing error that Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 101 X X _ L )
What can be reason for this as i am using movment type 101.
Thanks
Himanshu

Hi!
Is it possible to copy here the contents of your idoc? specially the item data... something like:
Segment Type - E1BP2017_GM_ITEM_CREATE
MATERIAL AAA
PLANT 1000
STGE_LOC 0001
MOVE_TYPE 101
ENTRY_QNT 1
ENTRY_UOM EA
MVT_IND B
Please, let me also know the idoc type you are using.
Thanks!
Esther.

Similar Messages

Idoc Failure due to APO substitute part number

Hi
Scenario: Intercompany p.o for a part. Plant in newzeland buy from Singapore.
In Sales Order and Delivery system proposes a substitute part number against P.O
So when delivery is created the idoc failed due to the discrepancy of P.O and S.O partnumber (susbstitute in S.O). In S.O Reason for Material Substutution: Softpart Roll (APO): 9912
Actual entered in P.O and substitute in S.O/D.O are enabled in both plants and material X plant status is C5 (New Product).
P.O status - Invoice recieved but Not yet GR.
SO Status - Delivery, Pick, PGI completed
Can any one advise how to clear the failed idocs and understand the root cause.
regards
RG.

Hi
It may be a not decent solution and long term.
As interim solution, once the substitute part arrived the recieving store at the buying instance, change the part number accordingly in the P.O (delete the old part number and add the new part number, and delete the output type to prevent any Idoc flow for the same order again.) and save it.
Now the GR can be performed.
regards
GJ

IMac Power supply PSU failure due to UPS type

I am posting this to aid anyone else who has suffered a similar issue as it took me some time to rectify and it was difficult to find evidence of proof.
Preamble:
My late 2012 27" iMac began powereing off, sometimes after a few days sometimes after 20 minutes. It gradually got worse until it would not power on at all.
I had tried all possible fixes I could including - reset SMC and NVRAM, reinstalling Mavericks, running from an external HDD with a cloned OS, running with a fresh Mavericks install on a USB stick.
Also ran Apple Hardware tests and used Micromat Techtool 7 with no problems apparent.
Also tried running when moved from my desk and plugged into a different socket in the house (this point is especially relevant).
Repair attempts:
Apple (via Amsys) changed the logic board. This worked for a day then the fault reoccurred. Apple (Apple store this time, Amsys scratched the aluminium housing previously so I avoided them) then changed the PSU.
This fixed the fault and the iMac ran with no problem (apart from audio missing - another discussion perhaps!), BUT when I moved the iMac back to its original position on my desk (having been plugged in the aforementioned other socket) it would not power on again. I then realised it was the UPS and iMac were not playing nicely. If I plugged the iMac into the UPS when the UPS was already powered on, the iMac would work until the next random power down. I have used the UPS with everything else including the iMac for over a year so didn't suspect it. However, I do have the occasional brownout (power dip) and power cut so it has been utilised for the iMac a handful of times without issue.
Solution:
I have now researched and concluded the iMac PSU (at least the Energy Star 5.0 onwards compliant ones, not sure about older iMacs) need a Pure Sine Wave UPS otherwise the PSU may be damaged as mine was. It may not happen until the UPS is called upon either. In fact any active PFC PSU could be affected. I could not find this out from Apple or APC (my UPS manufacturer), only with some reasearch and my own knowledge of electrics. It seems that not all iMacs are as sensitive or for other reasons this fault will not occur with a similar set-up to mine, but I am now confident that this was the cause. Please note I do not yet have my own Pure Sine Wave UPS and I am now running without one for the time being until I buy a Cyberpower CP1300EPFCLCD or similar.
Some of my references are below:-
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/apc-smt1500-cyberpower-cp1500pfclcd-tripp-li te-smart1500slt,2785.html
http://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=5553
http://forums.macresource.com/read.php?1,1196487,1197254

Welcome, Cubber;
yes, there are some people complaining here about power supplies -
I'd contact Apple and tell them your problem. Being hit twice by the same failure is not nice. Usually they cooperate - have a look at just this post her:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=673758&tstart=0
Please, keep us informed how it ends.
Thomas

Urgent: IDoc failures due to Chart of Accounts Not Found

We are posting IDoc FIDCC2.
The IDoc is failing with Error "G/L account 'XXXXXX' is not defined in chart of accounts XXX".
We went into Transaction f.10 and can see the the G/L account setup correctly.
I believe there is some configuration issue and these accounts are setup incorrectly. Please advice....
thanks!!
Ron

Go to FSP0 and check whether the account exists in CoA.
Hope that helps..
Thanks,
Nandita

IDOC Failure due to warning message

Dear Members,
When we pass data from MDM to ECC through XI, most of the times the IDOC fails, the reason we found out is the warning message that we get when we create vendor manually from XK, FK transaction codes.
Warning message that we get in XK & FX transaction codes are :
EX: Are you sure you want to map the following customer to the vendor.
Because of above warning message the IDOC's are failing.
As we cannot disable those messages, can we do anything else; mostly at IDOC side to avoid those warnings and to successfully post the IDOC.
Cheers,
Cherry.

Hi Chen,
The message I get at IDOC
Status 68 : Error No further processing &
Status 51 : Application document not posted.
WARNING message which I get under XK03 transaction --> change, when I try to modify the customer is:
Customer xxxxxxx is currently not referenced and will be updated accordingly
Other details
Message no. F2293
Application Area f2
Message number 293
Main program SAPMF02K
Include MF02KI00
Cheers,
Cherry.

Output type for movement type for IDOC creation

Dear Experts,
Can anybody tell how to create "Output type for different movement types for IDOC creation"
Specially for Movement type used for Inbound & outbound.

Hi,
pls find below link's
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/abap/idoc%2bsteps
BAPI & IDOC material
IDOC Scenario Steps
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/0b/2a60bb507d11d18ee90000e8366fc2/frameset.htm
http://sap.niraj.tripod.com/id51.html
http://www.thespot4sap.com/Articles/SAP_ALE_IDOCS.asp
Changing fields in an Idoc segment
Regards
Raj.

Idoc mbgmcr02 movement type 311 .. goods movement not possible w/mvmt type

i am using we19 to create a test idoc...i have the ports and partners filled in...i am using movement type 311..i have the material , the plant, the storage location...the qty..i have the move material, the move plant and move storage location filled in...
when i use standard inbound processing it generates the idoc..i go to we02 and look at the idoc..in the status records i get status 51 goods movement not possible with mvmt type 311..????what am i missing
if i do the exact same thing with the transaction migo...works fine...
am i missing something????

i am trying to move material from one location to another using IDOC MBGMCR02..
I am entering the following...
E1BP2017_GM_Code=04
in e1BP2017_GM_ITEM_Create
Material=CON2020
Plant=3000
Stg_Loc=0001
Move_Type=311
Entry Qty=001
Move_Mat=Con2020
Move_Plant=3000
Move_Stloc=0002
Mvt_Ind=??????
In the Mvt_Ind I have tried E,K,M,Q
the in get a status 51 Update Control of Movement Type is incorrect(entry311XX_K)....
Is E1BP2017_GM_CODE = 4 correct???
What should be the Mvt_Ind???

How to solve the INFREC Idoc failure with message type

Hi,
Please let me know how can we solve the INFREC Idoc with the message type" Not possible to set tax code without tax calculation schema"
Pl suggest me how to tackle this Idoc failure.
Regards
Raj

Hi,
An\ybody..please suggest.. It is very urgent..
Regards
Raj

ETL Failure Due to Failure of a Task

Hi All,
I am getting ETL failure due to failure of a task, sporadically. Also, when i re-run the ETL, the ETL completed successfully.
I have copied the informatica session log file.
DIRECTOR> VAR_27027 Use default value [0] for user-defined workflow/worklet variable:[$$passInStatus].
DIRECTOR> VAR_27028 Use override value [DataWarehouse] for session parameter:[$DBConnection_OLAP].
DIRECTOR> VAR_27028 Use override value [SEBL_80] for session parameter:[$DBConnection_OLTP].
DIRECTOR> VAR_27028 Use override value [1] for mapping parameter:[$$DATASOURCE_NUM_ID].
DIRECTOR> VAR_27028 Use override value [] for mapping parameter:[$$Hint1].
DIRECTOR> VAR_27028 Use override value [] for mapping parameter:[$$Hint2].
DIRECTOR> TM_6014 Initializing session [VisibilityActivityParty_Full] at [Wed Aug 17 00:31:31 2011]
DIRECTOR> TM_6683 Repository Name: [Oracle_BI_DW_Base]
DIRECTOR> TM_6684 Server Name: [Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service]
DIRECTOR> TM_6686 Folder: [SDE_SBL_80_Adaptor]
DIRECTOR> TM_6685 Workflow: [VisibilityActivityParty_Full]
DIRECTOR> TM_6101 Mapping name: VisibilityActivityParty [version 1]
DIRECTOR> TM_6827 [D:\Informatica\PowerCenter8.1.1\server\infa_shared\Storage] will be used as storage directory for session [VisibilityActivityParty_Full].
DIRECTOR> CMN_1802 Session recovery cache initialization is complete.
DIRECTOR> TM_6703 Session [VisibilityActivityParty_Full] is run by 32-bit Integration Service [node01_sb8anaprd], version [8.1.1 SP5], build [0822].
MANAGER> PETL_24058 Running Partition Group [1].
MANAGER> PETL_24000 Parallel Pipeline Engine initializing.
MANAGER> PETL_24001 Parallel Pipeline Engine running.
MANAGER> PETL_24003 Initializing session run.
MAPPING> CMN_1569 Server Mode: [ASCII]
MAPPING> CMN_1570 Server Code page: [MS Windows Latin 1 (ANSI), superset of Latin1]
MAPPING> TM_6151 Session Sort Order: [Binary]
MAPPING> TM_6156 Using LOW precision decimal arithmetic
MAPPING> TM_6180 Deadlock retry logic will not be implemented.
MAPPING> TM_6307 DTM Error Log Disabled.
MAPPING> TE_7022 TShmWriter: Initialized
MAPPING> DBG_21075 Connecting to database [obieeprd], user [OLAP]
MAPPING> DBG_21474 Warning: Update Strategy transform [UPDTRANS] is disabled. Set session type to [Data Driven] to enable it.
MAPPING> TM_6007 DTM initialized successfully for session [VisibilityActivityParty_Full]
DIRECTOR> PETL_24033 All DTM Connection Info: [<NONE>].
MANAGER> PETL_24004 Starting pre-session tasks. : (Wed Aug 17 00:31:31 2011)
MANAGER> PETL_24027 Pre-session task completed successfully. : (Wed Aug 17 00:31:31 2011)
DIRECTOR> PETL_24006 Starting data movement.
MAPPING> TM_6660 Total Buffer Pool size is 36000000 bytes and Block size is 65536 bytes.
READER_1_1_1> DBG_21438 Reader: Source is [SB8PRD], user [SIEBEL]
READER_1_1_1> BLKR_16003 Initialization completed successfully.
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8146 Writer: Target is database [obieeprd], user [OLAP], bulk mode [ON]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8106 Warning! Bulk Mode session - recovery is not guaranteed.
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8397 Appending output data to file [D:\Informatica\PowerCenter8.1.1\server\infa_shared\BadFiles\w_act_party.bad] (initial size [717]).
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8124 Target Table W_ACT_PARTY :SQL INSERT statement:
INSERT INTO W_ACT_PARTY(INTEGRATION_ID,DATASOURCE_NUM_ID,ETL_PROC_WID,TABLE_WID,ACTIVITY_ID,PARTY_ID) VALUES ( ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8124 Target Table W_ACT_PARTY :SQL UPDATE statement:
UPDATE W_ACT_PARTY SET ETL_PROC_WID = ?, ACTIVITY_ID = ?, PARTY_ID = ? WHERE INTEGRATION_ID = ? AND DATASOURCE_NUM_ID = ? AND TABLE_WID = ?
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8124 Target Table W_ACT_PARTY :SQL DELETE statement:
DELETE FROM W_ACT_PARTY WHERE INTEGRATION_ID = ? AND DATASOURCE_NUM_ID = ? AND TABLE_WID = ?
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8270 Target connection group #1 consists of target(s) [W_ACT_PARTY]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8003 Writer initialization complete.
READER_1_1_1> BLKR_16007 Reader run started.
READER_1_1_1> RR_4029 SQ Instance [SQ_S_ACT_EMP] User specified SQL Query [SELECT
     AEMP.ROW_ID,
     AEMP.ACTIVITY_ID,
     U.PAR_ROW_ID
FROM
     V_ACT_EMP AEMP,
     S_USER U
WHERE
     AEMP.EMP_ID = U.ROW_ID]
READER_1_1_1> RR_4049 SQL Query issued to database : (Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011)
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8005 Writer run started.
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8158
*****START LOAD SESSION*****
Load Start Time: Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011
Target tables:
W_ACT_PARTY
READER_1_1_1> RR_4050 First row returned from database to reader : (Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011)
LKPDP_1> DBG_21097 Lookup Transformation [LKP_W_ACT_PARTY]: Default sql to create lookup cache: SELECT ETL_PROC_WID,INTEGRATION_ID,TABLE_WID,DATASOURCE_NUM_ID FROM W_ACT_PARTY ORDER BY INTEGRATION_ID,TABLE_WID,DATASOURCE_NUM_ID,ETL_PROC_WID
LKPDP_1> TE_7212 Increasing [Index Cache] size for transformation [LKP_W_ACT_PARTY] from [1048576] to [1050000].
LKPDP_1> TM_6660 Total Buffer Pool size is 609824 bytes and Block size is 65536 bytes.
LKPDP_1:READER_1_1> DBG_21438 Reader: Source is [obieeprd], user [OLAP]
LKPDP_1:READER_1_1> BLKR_16003 Initialization completed successfully.
LKPDP_1:READER_1_1> BLKR_16007 Reader run started.
LKPDP_1:READER_1_1> RR_4049 SQL Query issued to database : (Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011)
LKPDP_1:READER_1_1> BLKR_16019 Read [0] rows, read [0] error rows for source table [LKP_W_ACT_PARTY{{DSQ}}] instance name [LKP_W_ACT_PARTY{{SRC}}]
LKPDP_1:READER_1_1> BLKR_16008 Reader run completed.
LKPDP_1:TRANSF_1_1> DBG_21682 Lookup table row count : 0
LKPDP_1:TRANSF_1_1> DBG_21297 Lookup cache row count : 0
LKPDP_1:TRANSF_1_1> DBG_21294 Lookup cache creation completed : (Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011)
LKPDP_1:TRANSF_1_1> CMN_1671 Created new cache files PMLKUP12190_9W32.[dat/idx] in directory D:\Informatica\PowerCenter8.1.1\server\infa_shared\Cache for Lookup [LKP_W_ACT_PARTY].
LKPDP_1:TRANSF_1_1> DBG_21641 LKP_W_ACT_PARTY: Index cache size = [1050000], Data cache size = [2097152]
LKPDP_1:TRANSF_1_1> DBG_21216 Finished transformations for Source Qualifier [LKP_W_ACT_PARTY{{DSQ}}]. Total errors [0]
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1079 WARNING: Lookup table contains no data.
TRANSF_1_1_1> DBG_21524 Transform : LKP_W_ACT_PARTY
TRANSF_1_1_1> DBG_21313 Lookup table : W_ACT_PARTY
TRANSF_1_1_1> DBG_21562 WARNING : Output rows from LKP_W_ACT_PARTY will be the default port value
LKPDP_2> DBG_21097 Lookup Transformation [LKP_ETL_PROC_WID]: Default sql to create lookup cache: SELECT ETL_PROC_WID,ROW_WID FROM W_PARAM_G ORDER BY ROW_WID,ETL_PROC_WID
LKPDP_2> TE_7212 Increasing [Index Cache] size for transformation [LKP_ETL_PROC_WID] from [1048576] to [1050000].
LKPDP_2> TM_6660 Total Buffer Pool size is 609824 bytes and Block size is 65536 bytes.
LKPDP_2:READER_1_1> DBG_21438 Reader: Source is [obieeprd], user [OLAP]
LKPDP_2:READER_1_1> BLKR_16003 Initialization completed successfully.
LKPDP_2:READER_1_1> BLKR_16007 Reader run started.
LKPDP_2:READER_1_1> RR_4049 SQL Query issued to database : (Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011)
LKPDP_2:READER_1_1> BLKR_16019 Read [0] rows, read [0] error rows for source table [LKP_ETL_PROC_WID{{DSQ}}] instance name [LKP_ETL_PROC_WID{{SRC}}]
LKPDP_2:READER_1_1> BLKR_16008 Reader run completed.
LKPDP_2:TRANSF_1_1> DBG_21682 Lookup table row count : 0
LKPDP_2:TRANSF_1_1> DBG_21297 Lookup cache row count : 0
LKPDP_2:TRANSF_1_1> DBG_21294 Lookup cache creation completed : (Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011)
LKPDP_2:TRANSF_1_1> CMN_1671 Created new cache files PMLKUP12190_10W32.[dat/idx] in directory D:\Informatica\PowerCenter8.1.1\server\infa_shared\Cache for Lookup [LKP_ETL_PROC_WID].
LKPDP_2:TRANSF_1_1> DBG_21641 LKP_ETL_PROC_WID: Index cache size = [1050000], Data cache size = [2097152]
LKPDP_2:TRANSF_1_1> DBG_21216 Finished transformations for Source Qualifier [LKP_ETL_PROC_WID{{DSQ}}]. Total errors [0]
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1079 WARNING: Lookup table contains no data.
TRANSF_1_1_1> DBG_21524 Transform : LKP_ETL_PROC_WID1
TRANSF_1_1_1> DBG_21313 Lookup table : W_PARAM_G
TRANSF_1_1_1> DBG_21562 WARNING : Output rows from LKP_ETL_PROC_WID1 will be the default port value
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8167 Start loading table [W_ACT_PARTY] at: Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011
WRITER_1_*_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8229 Database errors occurred:
ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into (ETL_PROC_WID)
Database driver error...
Function Name : Execute Multiple
SQL Stmt : INSERT INTO W_ACT_PARTY(INTEGRATION_ID,DATASOURCE_NUM_ID,ETL_PROC_WID,TABLE_WID,ACTIVITY_ID,PARTY_ID) VALUES ( ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
WRITER_1_*_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8425 ERROR: Writer execution failed.
WRITER_1_*_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8114
Row # [1] in bad file
WRITER_1_*_1> CMN_1053 : Rowdata: ( RowType=0(insert) Src Rowid=1 Targ Rowid=1
INTEGRATION_ID (INTEGRATION_ID:Char.30:): "1-B8THY"
DATASOURCE_NUM_ID (DATASOURCE_NUM_ID:Double:): "1.000000000000000"
ETL_PROC_WID (ETL_PROC_WID:Double:): "(NULL)"
TABLE_WID (TABLE_WID:Double:): "68.00000000000000"
ACTIVITY_ID (ACTIVITY_ID:Char.15:): "1-N8FBX"
PARTY_ID (PARTY_ID:Char.15:): "0-1"
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8164 Error loading into target [W_ACT_PARTY] : Bad rows exceeded Session Threshold [1]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8333 Rolling back all the targets due to fatal session error.
WRITER_1_*_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
WRITER_1_*_1> CMN_1022 Database driver error...
CMN_1022 [
ORA-24795: Illegal ROLLBACK attempt made
Database driver error...
Function Name : Commit
Database driver error...
Function Name : Rollback]
WRITER_1_*_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8183 Rollback failed for the target [W_ACT_PARTY]
WRITER_1_*_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8080 Writer run terminated. [Error loading data and error threshold reached]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8168 End loading table [W_ACT_PARTY] at: Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8035 Load complete time: Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011
LOAD SUMMARY
============
WRT_8036 Target: W_ACT_PARTY (Instance Name: [W_ACT_PARTY])
WRT_8038 Inserted rows - Requested: 488 Applied: 0 Rejected: 1 Affected: 0
WRITER_1__1> WRT_8043 ****END LOAD SESSION*****
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [W_ACT_PARTY] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [UPDTRANS] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [UPDTRANS] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [FILTRANS] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [FILTRANS] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [LKP_ETL_PROC_WID] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [LKP_ETL_PROC_WID] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [EXPTRANS] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [EXPTRANS] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [SQ_S_ACT_EMP] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [SQ_S_ACT_EMP] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Aug 17 00:31:32 2011]
TRANSF_1_1_1> TM_6085 The transformation [SQ_S_ACT_EMP] encountered fatal error. Terminating session.
TRANSF_1_1_1> DBG_21511 TE: Fatal Transformation Error.
MANAGER> PETL_24031
***** RUN INFO FOR TGT LOAD ORDER GROUP [1], CONCURRENT SET [1] *****
Thread [READER_1_1_1] created for [the read stage] of partition point [SQ_S_ACT_EMP] has completed: Total Run Time = [0.656254] secs, Total Idle Time = [0.390627] secs, Busy Percentage = [40.476246].
Thread [TRANSF_1_1_1] created for [the transformation stage] of partition point [SQ_S_ACT_EMP] has completed: Total Run Time = [0.562504] secs, Total Idle Time = [0.406252] secs, Busy Percentage = [27.777928].
Thread [WRITER_1_*_1] created for [the write stage] of partition point [W_ACT_PARTY] has completed. The total run time was insufficient for any meaningful statistics.
MANAGER> PETL_24005 Starting post-session tasks. : (Wed Aug 17 00:31:33 2011)
MANAGER> PETL_24029 Post-session task completed successfully. : (Wed Aug 17 00:31:33 2011)
MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP12190_9W32] for transformation [LKP_W_ACT_PARTY].
MAPPING> TE_7216 Deleting cache files [PMLKUP12190_10W32] for transformation [LKP_ETL_PROC_WID].
MAPPING> TM_6018 Session [VisibilityActivityParty_Full] run completed with [0] row transformation errors.
MANAGER> PETL_24002 Parallel Pipeline Engine finished.
DIRECTOR> PETL_24013 Session run completed with failure.
DIRECTOR> TM_6022
SESSION LOAD SUMMARY
================================================
DIRECTOR> TM_6252 Source Load Summary.
DIRECTOR> CMN_1740 Table: [SQ_S_ACT_EMP] (Instance Name: [SQ_S_ACT_EMP])
     Output Rows [50592], Affected Rows [50592], Applied Rows [50592], Rejected Rows [0]
DIRECTOR> TM_6253 Target Load Summary.
DIRECTOR> CMN_1740 Table: [W_ACT_PARTY] (Instance Name: [W_ACT_PARTY])
     Output Rows [0], Affected Rows [0], Applied Rows [0], Rejected Rows [1]
DIRECTOR> TM_6023
===================================================
DIRECTOR> TM_6020 Session [VisibilityActivityParty_Full] completed at [Wed Aug 17 00:31:33 2011]
Can some one help me to debug the issue please ?
Thanks

Hi Nat,
Thanks a lot for your response.
I am running this ETL task from DAC. This task is a part of Daily Full load ETL. As i mentioned earlier, this task fails sporadically and failing till now. After restarting the ETL, it gets completed.
Please let me know if you have any question.
Thanks,
Neeraj

Cancellation of Mat Document for Return delivery mov 161(Here Mov Type 922)

Hi SAP Support,
     Myself got an issue relevent to Wrong MIGO. User due to wrong concept did MIGO where Movement type was 922 though its return PO (Means Return PO
is ticked - Mov type 161).
Explanation : At the time of MIGO , default movement type was 101, so automatically it should pick 161 at the time of Good Received.
          But here when the user open the MIGO Screen, last movement type was showing i.e. 901. And user did MIGO where it changed automatically to 922.
Now when I cancelled the document, flow was :
          a.      5000147271 - 922
          b.      5000151684 - 161
          c.     5000151730 - 162
          d.     5000152339 - 161
Which is wrong as per my perception and i.e. why not maching the same.
But while doing the Same in Quality Server with the Same Documents (Just refreshed 2 days back), flow is
          a.      5000147271 - 922
          b.      5000151684 - 123
          c.s     5000151730 - 161
     Which is perfect one. And this should be the results. Now my reuirment that how could I do managed the same way in Production. Please help me.
Regards,
Pinku

Hi,
Can you please explain as to what this "9" series movement type represent.Is the movement type "922" a copy of the movement type "122" ?
Kindly make a note that the reversal movement types are determined from the configuration for "Copy ,Change Movement types" T code - OMJJ. Here select any movement type & click on "Reversal/follow-on movement types" for which you want to know the reversal movement type. Hope this gives you an idea for resolving the issue.
Regards
Swapnil

Report MB5B for selected movement types

Dear All,
When I am executing report for selected movement types , system givivng me message below " Movment type is reset"
After continuing that Movement type field turns BLANK, and report is executed with considering all movement types.
If there is a way for executing MB5B report for selected movement types, please suggest.
Thanx..

Hai,
1.The MB5B report will show the stock on posting date with all movements like Goods recipt from Purchase, production order, stock transport order, & goods issue due to consumption posting, stock transfers & transfer posting.
2. This is designed to see the Opening balane+Goods receipt - goods issue = closing balance.
3.You can't take report only for particulat movement type.
4.If u want to get the details as per the movement type, then use MB51 report.

Error while creating new Movement Type

All SAP Gurus,
We are creating a new Z movement type by copying the 101 movement type (T code: OMJJ).
But system is not allowing to create a new movement type and giving an error message as 'Specify the key within the work area'.
We are unable to create a new movement type due to this error.
Please help...................
Regards,

How did solve the problem
plz let me know
thanks.

Transfer posting with Mov Type 311E in MIGO with reference to SC-PO

Hi,
I am working with MTO scenario.
I want to carry out transfer posting of material with movement type 311E against subcontracting Purchase Order which is sale order specific.
However, system does not allow me to do the same. whenever transfer posting, PO & movement type is selected in transaction MIGO, item details entry tabs are displayed blank.
Below steps are being follow:
Scenario is MTO ( special stock subcontracting)
1. Subcontracting PO no. 4500000147 against Sale Order no 61 created.
2. RM code - 61, available stock 100 TO & batch no.0000000127
3. Transfer material to vendor for processing through MIGO ( since it is a special sales order stock, transferring happens from SL 0001- Main Stores to SL VLSC -Virtual storage location) using movement type 311 E
5. Item Data details tabs are blank.---This is the issue / error.
Note: I am restricted to post transfer posting through MIGO-Transfer Posting (will not use MB1B) due to some enhancement of MIGO and interfaces with legacy system.
Please have a look on attachment for SAP screen issue.
Regards
Mohit Jaiswal

Hi Mohit ,
please check below link , you need to perform steps as given
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/4d/2b90b043ad11d189410000e829fbbd/content.htm
also see the sales order subcontracting using the business addon
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/c7/2587b8dad94c52854ccd28015dceb0/frameset.htm

Movement type 545

Dear Experts,
I have a scenario in which I am doing a subcontracting of Material A (SPK 30).
The BOM of A is as follows.
A -> FERT (Quantity 1)
     B -> HALB (Quantity 1)
     C -> HALB (Quantity 1)
     D -> HALB (Quantity 1)
I am giving Materials B, C and D to Vendor and I am receiving Material A as my subcontracting material.
But now due to change in the customer requirement I need to send Material A again to vendor.
So now my subcontracting material is D. As per customer requirement, he donu2019t want material C & D in the complete assembly, instead of C & D, he want material E & F in the assembly.
The BOM of material D looks like
D -> FERT (Quantity 1)
     A -> FERT (Quantity 1)
     C -> HALB (Quantity 1-)
     D -> HALB (Quantity 1-)
     E -> HALB (Quantity 1)
     F -> HALB (Quantity 1)
I manually created a BOM of material D as above in subcontracting PO.
So once I do the MIGO (GR) of material D, it should increase the stock of material C & D because I have indicated them as u2018u2013veu2019 quantity.
When I do the MIGO of material D, movement type 545 (by product) is getting triggered for C & D but I was unable to enter the storage location. The field storage location was not present under the tab u2018Whereu2019.
Whereas the same was working fine in case of in house production.
Your reply is highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Mayur

On doing MIGO,In case of movement type 545,by product will be at subcontractor place not at storage location.
Check material stock(C,D) in MMBE - Special stock - 'O' or MBLB.
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on May 19, 2011 3:45 PM

Movement type for transfer of stock from Stock-in-transit to Vendor

Hello,
Is there any movement type for transfer of stock from Stock-in-transit to Vendor.
For internal transfer from Plant to Plant we follow Purchase Requisition -> Stock Transfer Order (PO Modified) -> Delivery (VL04) -> MIGO (Goods Receipt against Delivery) method.
The problem arises when the actual delivery quantity is less then what is entered in the system (due to clerical error). That is, physically less quantity were dispatched and received at the receiving plant. Now the balance quantity is lying as stock-in-transit. To clear it we are receiving the material and using transfer posting for plant to plant transfer. Though physically there is no transfer of goods. Now we do not want to receive the material instead we want it to transfer from stock in transit to the supplying plant. Is it possible ?
Thanks.
Ashish

Hi Ashish,
When You issue the stock, the accounting document is posted . There is no accounting entires when you do Goods receipt at receving plant . In case , we are developing to make it happen , I feel it may have impact on the Material Valuation aspects .
Hence, I feel it is better to adopt any of the following 2 options.
1) Cancellation of the entire delivery and make new delivery or 2) Receive the entire qty at the receiving plant and decide what you want to do with the unavl qty . For example in your case of loss of material due to accident , you can scrap the material in the receving plant itself or return the material back to the sending plant.
Regards
Mani

Idoc failure due to movement type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for