Idoc in status syntax error check

Hi,
Outbound invoice idoc ended in status 7 (error during syntax check). I check the alloted segment numbers in WE30 and the maximum number alloted segment is not exceeded. Any possible reasons why this scenario is happening?
Thanks for the feedback.

Hi,
Did you check if the segments in the Data Record are in a hierarchial order (ie) Parent segment followed by the Child segments, the Parent segment should alway be mandatory.
I have faced a similar error of this kind and the reason was because of the ordering of the segments.
Thanks
Krithika

Similar Messages

  • 5 IDOC with status 29 Error in ALE service

    hi there,
    im looking at this similar problem with less information on me the only info i got is this can anyone help me out pls
    IDOC Status Outbox:
    IDOC failure between 13/07/2008 to 14/07/2009
    1 IDOC with status 02 Error passing data to port
    5 IDOC with status 29 Error in ALE service
    IDOC Status InBox:
    88 IDOC with status 51 Application document not posted
    regards
    raju

    Hi,
    Check this thread.
    DB13-DBCHECK by saving log-throwing DUMP:TSV_TNEW_BLOCKS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY
    Regards.

  • How to Reprocess Outbound Idocs in Status 02 (Errors)

    Hi,
        I have an urgent problem. How do I re-process an Outbound IDoc in Status '02' (Error Passing Data to Port)
        I have tried reprocessing this IDoc through BD87 using both the options Edit>Process and Edit>Restrict and Process, but it doesn't work
         Please help as we are migrating cutover data from SAP to another system
    Regards,
    Aditya

    Worth to have a look at this thread
    Error handling problem with outbound idoc status 02 and  XML HTTP Port
    Regards
    Vivek
    Reward points for all the useful answers

  • Error in idoc with status 20 "Error triggering EDI Subsystem"

    Dear All,
    I have query related to IDOC Status 20.
    I am tirggering IDOC with standard t-code from IS-Retail system. I have created two ports a) TRFC port and b)File port .
    <b>We are having sending and receiveing application on two different OS i.e one XI on Windows and IS Retail on AIX(Unix). I am not able to send idoc to another system. I am getting these IDOC status in WE05 (STATUS 01 , 30 , 03 , 20 )</b>
    Keeping the above fatcs in mind could you please tell me how to remove the <b>error with status 20 "Error triggering EDI Subsystem".</b>

    Hi prabhat,
    You should have checked the automatic triggering possible at the file port level and the partner profile setting could be 'start subsytem'.
    Go to WE21 and do the access test for the file port.
    Once you done and find no issues then go to SM59 and test the connection for the RFC destination assigned to the ports.Possibly it has to do with the RFC destination.
    Other reasons could be yours is a test client and got refreshed recently.so the production client settings might be causing this error.Check with your basis to get it working.
    other reason could be the logical system assigned to the client should be having production client's name.
    Check these.
    I am sure you should be able to solve this issue.
    Thank you.
    regards,
    karun.M

  • Outbound Idoc 03 status - SM58 error

    Hi ,
    For Oubound Idoc, I am getting Idoc with status 03 but is not there in Receipient system.
    When I check Idoc in Sm58, Idoc has error <b>"The ABAP/4 Open SQL array insert results in duplicate database records".</b>
    Can anybody help me how to solve this issue?
    Thanks & regards,
    Yogita

    use FM idoc_status_write_to_database to change the IDoc status from 03 to 30 and then  run WE14 or  RSEOUT00 to change the status back to 03
    resending idoc from status 03 ...is a data duplicatino issue on receiving side...why do u need to do that ?
    Use WE19 tcode to debug
    In we19
    1)U can choose your Idoc number in existing Idoc textbox
    2)Press execute
    3)u will display ur Idoc struct
    4)Dbl click on any field then u can modify its content
    5)PressStd Outbound Processing Btn to process modified Idoc
    Thats it

  • Extend Idoc  INVOIC02 - E1EDKA1 - Syntax error

    Hi All,
    I have extended Basic idoc “INVOIC02” and using exit “EXIT_SAPLVEDF_002” to extend custom segment. I am trying to add a custom segment under “E1EDKA1”. In program I am inserting ‘Z1’ segment after parent segment “E1EDKA1”. I am passing Parent segment reference (INT_EDIDD-PSGNUM) and hierarchy level of custom (INT_EDIDD-HLEVEL) segment. Problem is custom segment still placed under root segment after “E1EDKA1” segment, which is incorrect.  Idoc error with status ‘26’ – Syntax error. Can any one tell me what I am doing wrong or how do I manage to get custom segment under parent segment “E1EDKA1”, so that I don’t get this error. Below code for your reference. Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Tim
    Program -
    "ZXEDFU02" -
    describe table INT_EDIDD lines gv_indes.
    read table INT_EDIDD index gv_indes.
    if sy-subrc eq 0.
      if INT_EDIDD-segnam eq co_e1edka1 and
         INT_EDIDD-sdata+0(3) eq 'ZM'.
    Now INSERT segment Idoc value and custom extend field
        if not gv_email is initial.
                INT_EDIDD-PSGNUM = gv_indes.
                INT_EDIDD-HLEVEL = '03'.
          move: co_z1edka1        to INT_EDIDD-SEGNAM,
                'email address'   to INT_EDIDD-SDATA.
          append INT_EDIDD.
        endif.
      endif.
    endif.

    Your logic looks ok.  I would remove the code to populate the parent segment number and hierarchy level.  SAP will determine those on its own.
    As for the result you are seeing, if there is a syntax error on an IDoc, the entire hierarchy will be lost so the fact that the custom segment is showing up at the same level as its parent doesn't mean that is actually causing the syntax error.
    Did you add your extension in the partner profile?
    Program -
    "ZXEDFU02" -
    describe table INT_EDIDD lines gv_indes.
    read table INT_EDIDD index gv_indes.
    if sy-subrc eq 0.
    if INT_EDIDD-segnam eq co_e1edka1 and
    INT_EDIDD-sdata+0(3) eq 'ZM'.
    Now INSERT segment Idoc value and custom extend field
    if not gv_email is initial.
    INT_EDIDD-PSGNUM = gv_indes.
    INT_EDIDD-HLEVEL = '03'.
    move: co_z1edka1 to INT_EDIDD-SEGNAM,
    'email address' to INT_EDIDD-SDATA.
    append INT_EDIDD.
    endif.
    endif.
    endif.

  • Syntax/error checking breaks in FlexBuilder/Flashbuilder with class libraries over Samba?

    We have our class libraries on a shared server we access via Samba (and ssh for command line). Sadly, several features seem to fail in both Flex Builder and Flash Builder/Gumbo with this setup. For example, we no longer get automatic syntax and error checking. Anyone familiar with this issue and able to suggest a solution? Thanks!

    Be sure you are not mixing -compat=4 and -compat=5 compilations in the same program.
    The -compat=4 mode is for compiling very old source code that was written for C++ 4.2 (1996). It provides almost none of the features of standard C++. Don't use this mode unless there is a specific reason why you must.
    Do not use -I or -L options that point into /usr/include, /usr/lib, or into the compiler installation area. These directories are always searched by default in the correct order. If you specify them explicitly, you force an incorrect search order.
    Be sure you have the minimum patch level of SUNWlibC required by the compiler. The patch includes libCstd, libCrun, libC, libiostream, libdemangle, and some other files. The minimum patch level comes with the compiler, and the Sun Studio installer will install the patch on the system where the compiler is installed.
    You also need the patch on every system that runs the compiler, and every system that runs programs created by the compiler.
    It is always safe to use the latest SUNWlibC patch. You can download the current patch from
    http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/patches/index.jsp
    But the link failure in your case is due to a missing function from your own code, since it involves a function parameter of a programmer-defined type. I suspect you have either
    1. failed to define (provide a body for) the function,
    2. declared it inconsistently as inline and not inline,
    3. defined the function in a namespace different from the one where it was declared, or
    4. failed to link the object file where the function is defined.

  • IDOC Error Status 20 - Error triggering EDI subsystem

    Hi Expert
    I have articles which have 2 different EAN, (KG & EA) for single store i am getting error , if i generated a IDOC for EA articles, not KG articles.
    Kindly suggest me a solution
    Regard
    Nabil

    Hi,
    Please check with this link, it could be helpful.
    Error in idoc with status 20 "Error triggering EDI Subsystem"

  • Status 29: Error in ALE service : Entry in outbound table not found

    IDoc: 0000000003560240 Status 29: Error in ALE service
    Entry in outbound table not found
    No partner profile (outbound parameter) could be found using the following key:
    /0000000000/LS//YHROT_XXM_IN////
    This refers to the key fields in table EDP13:
    RCVPRN  Partner number
    RCVPRT  Partner type
    RCVPFC  Partner function
    MESTYP  Logical message
    MESTYP  Message code
    MESCOD  Message function
    TEST    Test indicator
    Procedure
    Please check the EDI partner profiles.
    But The IDOC befor this and after this is successfully run.
    And even after reprocessing also it is giving same error.
    After checking Contorl record, we found that there is no data in receipant Info in Partner Tab.
    What would be the issue.
    Please suggest. 
    Thanks & Regards,
    Monika

    Hi ,
    Thanks for your reply.
    We are using one custom message type.
    I would like to give you example of exact scenario.
    Suppose my IDOC has large amount of segments then ,
    It is dividing as
    1st IDOC : Control record ....header and data segments
    2nd IDOC : only data segment
    3rd IDOc : only data segment
    4th IDOC : data segment and Trailer.
    In this way, I am getting all my 4 IDOCs in error.
    What should be d reason?
    your help will be grateful.
    Hi Everyone,
    any update?
    Edited by: Monika.Dhumal on Feb 14, 2012 11:49 AM

  • Getting Error 26 in ALE IDOC scenario .- EDI Syntax Check Error...

    Hi..
    i am working in ALE Idoc scenario...I am getting Status 3 as well as status 26 in we02 transaction in my custom IDOC scenario for outbound process..
    The error is 'EDI- SYntax Check'..
    How to remove this error..
    Pls help.

    ya, there is only one segment available in IDOC..named i.e zseg_a .
    So , error in postion is avoided..
    How to find syntax error then?

  • IDOC Status 26: EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified).

    Hi All,
    I have created IDOC extension for IDOC Basic type "PROACT01" and have followed all required necessary steps but getting IDOC
    Status 26. EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified). The exact error is:
    Please check Error Details and the details of the steps I followed for Setting up IDOC Extension:
    Error Detail :
    EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)
    Message no. E0078
    Diagnosis
    The segment ZPROSEG does not occur at the current level of the basic type PROACT01 (extension PROACTEX).
    This error can have several reasons:
    The segment ZPROSEG is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
    The segment ZPROSEG does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type PROACT01 (extension PROACTEX).
    The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
    Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
    Procedure
    Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type PROACT01 (extension PROACTEX).
    Can you please look at this problem and suggest what is wrong with IDOC Extension/Custome Segment?
    Below is the Details of the Steps which I have followed:
    1. Tcode WE31 - Created new custom Segment ZPROSEG with 4 fields. Released segment.
    2. TCode WE30 - Created IDOC Extension PROACTEX for Basic Type PROACT01. Released IDOC extension.
         Here when I run syntax check warning appears "No predecessors exist".  I am not sure if its okay!!
    3. TCode WE82 - Added Extension PROACTEX in the Message Type PROACT with BASIC Type PROACT01.
    4. TCode WE20 - Added IDOC Extension PROACTEX in the predefined partner profile in WE20 transaction.
    5. Added the following code in the Customer Exit EXIT_SAPLWVMI_001 include ZXWVMIU01 .
    DATA segnam(27).
    READ TABLE dedidd WITH KEY segnam = 'ZPROSEG'.
    IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    LOOP AT dedidd WHERE segnam = 'E1EDP31'.
    CLEAR dedidd.
    dedidd-segnam = 'ZPROSEG'.
    zproseg-matnr = 'Mat1'.
    zproseg-lgort = '001'.
    zproseg-gernr = 'SNo1'.
    zproseg-labst = 2.
    dedidd-sdata = zproseg.
    APPEND dedidd.
    ENDLOOP.
    ENDIF.
    Finally ran  transaction WVM2 (Transfer of Stock & Sales Data) to generate IDOC, its creating IDOC but when checked IDOC in WE05 its getting Status Error "26".
    Looking forward for your reply.
    Many thanks in advance.

    Hello,
    Actually you are appending the Z segment instead of inserting into the correct position. So the segment is added at the last, so hierarchy of segments is collapsed.
    So get the index of the previous segment E1EDP31 and increase the index by 1 and INSERT the Z segment with that new index as below.
    LOOP AT dedidd WHERE segnam = 'E1EDP31'.
    lv_index = sy-tabix. " <<--
    ADD 1 TO lv_index. " <<--
    CLEAR dedidd.
    dedidd-segnam = 'ZPROSEG'.
    zproseg-matnr = 'Mat1'.
    zproseg-lgort = '001'.
    zproseg-gernr = 'SNo1'.
    zproseg-labst = 2.
    dedidd-sdata = zproseg.
    *APPEND dedidd.
    INSERT dedidd INDEX lv_index. " <<---
    ENDLOOP.
    Here actually we are insering the record inside the LOOP and it regenerates the index again. It is not actually a good practice.
    So the best practice is get the index and generate the segment inside the loop, store them into another internal table, come out the loop and insert the Z segments into DEDIDD by looping the new internal table.

  • Regarading IDOC status 26 ,syntax error

    Hi All,
    we have some problem to create IDOC type ORDERS05 for Purchase Order.
    *ERROR STATUS 26:*
    (SYNTAX ERROR IN IDOC (SEGMENT CANT B IDENTIFIED))
    msg number E0078:
    The segment E1EDK14 does not occur at the current level of the basic type ORDERS05 (extension ) AND
       e1edk14 segment missed.instead of 5 ,it shows only 4.
    *ERROR STATUS 26:*
    (SYNTAX ERROR IN IDOC (MANDATORY DATA MISSING))
    msg E0072:The segment E1EDK01 has the attribute 'Mandatory' in the syntax description of the basic type ORDERS05 (customer enhancement ).
    header data was totally different.
    it contains street fields,n country ,,like dat,instead of document number
    However, the segment is missing in the IDoc. The segment number logged in the status record identifies the item before which the segment is missing.
    This happens for order create (ORDERS) and for order change (ORDCHG)
    Do you have any idea to solve the problem? I'm using a standard IDOC.

    hi
    Usually posting program contains your logic which exists in process code this process code contain function module nothing but posting program
    and also
    check whether u r using
    1) sap standard program
    2) user defined program
    3) enhancing sap program using user exits
    if it is standard program check all ur ALE settings once again
    if ur using user defined check ur program logic and compare it with idoc structure
    if ur enhancing sap standard program check partner profiles using correct message & idoc type
    check your user exit logic
    reward if u find helpful
    Thanks&Regards
    Nagesh.Paruchuri

  • IDOC Syntax Error E0072 with status 26 after upgrade to ECC6.0

    Hi
    We have upgraded SAP R/3 from 4.6C to ECC6.0. After upgrade, when we create PO and output EDI, we are seeing this IDOC syntax error E0072 for Mandatory Segment E1EDK01. In 4.6C it was working fine with no issues, only after upgrade this problem started. It says E1EDK01 is missing which is mandatory. We are using basic type ORDERS01 with no extensions. When we see WE30 it looks fine, WE20 settings looks fine.
    Order of the segments got scrambled in upgraded version. First segment is E1EDP19001, this is supposed to be under E1EDP01 segment. There are two E1EDP19001 segments created but there were no sub segments to E1EDP01.
    Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Pandiri

    User Exit activation and fixing the issue in user exit fixed this issue.

  • Syntax error in IDoc (too many repetitions of a segment)

    Hi,
    I tried to load master data from R/3 into BW system. The load is not ending and the IDoc error message is displaying,
    The error message is " EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (too many repetitions of a segment) with status 26"  .
    I tried to analise the issue and checked in the Idoc List Outbox of BW system. I found Red status message with number 26 stating " Error during Syntax check of IDoc (Outbound) and the message type is RSRQST.
    Could any one help me out in solving this problem. Reply to the message if any more information needed.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Koushik

    I'm getting the same error. I think it is because I have a InfoPackage selection routine, that selects more than 1000 select conditions. I guess it is a parameter that needs to be changed somewhere. Any help on this one?
    BR
    Øyvind

  • Idoc syntax errors

    Hi all,
    Im developing a interface for purchase/sales orders. i populated the fields into segments and am running the function module. it is creating an idoc with status 60
    EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified).
    I dont know which segment its not identifying..
    mesage type ZXXXXXX
    process code used orde
    fm idoc_input_orders.
    can somebody help me with this in trouble shooting
    thanks,
    Kiran

    Hi Vijay,
    this is the structure of edidc when i c it in we19..dont know how to clear this error.
    EDIDC   2000000000000404101620 60        2SAPSD1    LSSD1CLNT200                                                                               
    E1EDK01                                                           
           E1EDK14                     0081800                               
           E1EDK14                     00710                                 
           E1EDK14                     00610                                 
           E1EDK14                     012ZOR                                
           E1EDK14                     019OMY                                
           E1EDK03                     00220040809                           
           E1EDK03                     02200000000                           
           E1EDK03                     02300000000                           
           E1EDKA1                     AG 0002200253                         
           E1EDKA1                     VE 00000096                           
           E1EDK02                     001CUSTPONOTEST1                      
           E1EDK02                     044J0000000143                        
        4  E1EDKT1                     Z004I    VBBK                         
        4  E1EDKT1                     Z002I    VBBK                         
        4  E1EDP01                     000001     0000000010     PCE         
           E1EDL44                     1                                     
    this is the erro message im getting..
    The segment E1EDL44 does not occur at the current level of the basic type ORDERS05 (extension ).
    This error can have several reasons:
    The segment E1EDL44 is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
    The segment E1EDL44 does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type ORDERS05 (extension ).
    The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
    Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
    Procedure
    Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type ORDERS05 (extension ).
    thanks..

Maybe you are looking for

  • [solved]Yet Another "X won't start" thread

    I get the black screen when i try to startx. i followed the wiki entry to set up X, but it doesn't work. Now, what i want to know is, how do i go back on a fresh install to an older version of X, that *doesn't* use HAL? Last edited by GypsyJoker (200

  • Change barcode in adobe reader

    I have created fill able PDF  form in the adobe acrobat pro with pdf417 bar code. In adobe acrobat pro i have successfully changed bar code with changing text field value. But when i open  PDF  file in adobe reader file was doesn't changed bar code.(

  • Callback Functions for the Enterprise API

    I'm using VB to write some API functions to pull journal detail from Enterprise 6.0, but having trouble with the callbacks. I did find some syntax errors in the toolkit.bas file, correct those and am able to pull specific data points, but the enum fu

  • Adobe - Error executing program

    Hi, When I am executing the WebDynpro program DEMO_ADOBE_OFFLINE I am getting the following error in the log file ACCESS.ERROR: Authorization check for caller assignment to J2EE security role [sap.com/com.sap.lcr*sld : LcrClassWriter]. We have done t

  • Enhancement object does not exist for enhancement implementation

    Hi Experts, When i tried activating my implementation, i got the sujected error. any kind of inputs will be very helpful. This is an existing implementation and was last changed in October, I just wanted to added few more changes to that. Here is the