Problem in Extended Classic Scenario related to PO

hi,
we are using Extended classic scenario in our client. User has created a SC .when we are going to create a PO system is showing an error Purchase Group B01 does not exist.
This Purchase group is not created in R3 or neither replicated to SRM.and it is not assigned in the Org structure.
Kindly Let me know from where the purchase Group might be Picked apart from the org Structure.
regards
subhash

Hi
Can you check your SC how this Purchase group picked form your basic data ?
since this purchase group is existing in srm thats why it picked while create sc right?
regards
Muthu

Similar Messages

Extended Classic Scenario - SHC: Buffer table not up to date

Hello all,
I'm working in SRM_SERVER 550, SAPKIBKT11, and having issues using BACKEND PURCHASING ORGANISATIONS and the Extended Classic Scenario.
According to SAP note 944918 the following indicator should not be required to be set:
Supplier Relationship Management>SRM Server>Cross-Application Basic Settings>Activate Extended Classic Scenario --> extended classic scenario active.
I did set the Backend Purch. Grps Responsible indicator, and I did create organizational units specifically for the backend purch. grps.
We need to set the main part of all SHCs to ECS, but when I do set the indicator in customizing to "extended classic scenario = active", I get a dump in my web environment: 'buffer table not up to date'.
What is causing this failure in my SHC?
I tried to implement BAdI "BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI" (method DETERMINE_EXTPO) like described below here: without the line bbp_extpo_gl-bbpexpo = 'X'., I can continue and create the SHCs. Problem is though: all SHCs will get marked as Classic Scenario. So, to make sure the SHCs will always get marked as ECS, I have added this line in the BAdI. Unfortunately this immediately results in the 'buffer table not up to date' error in the SHC itself, as soon as I try to open the details of the new item.
Hope you help me out here?? It doesn't seem to be related to the BAdI, but somehow the system doesn't allow me to mark SHC items as ECS.
Thanks & Regards,
Berend Oosterhoff
SRM Consultant Accenture Technology Solutions - The Netherlands.
BAdI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI:
method IF_EX_BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI~DETERMINE_EXTPO.
data definition----------------------------------------------------*
DATA:    wa_mattype     TYPE BAPIMATDOA,
           wa_char18      TYPE MATNR,
           attrib_tab     TYPE TABLE OF bbp_attributes,
           wa_attrib_tab TYPE bbp_attributes,
           wa_value       TYPE om_attrval,
           wa_product_id TYPE comt_product_id.
    bbp_extpo_gl-bbpexpo = 'X'.
from here I did the specific selection for the SC, but that's not relevant here.

Hi Prashant,
Thanks for your quick reply!
Note 1085700 is about Short Dumps when creating or changing a contract. I am trying to create a Shopping Cart, without a reference to a contract. BAdI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI is not active in our system.
Any other thoughts?
Regards,
Berend

Error while creating Manual Service PO in Extended Classic Scenario

Hi Experts,
Extended Classic scenario (SRM 7.0 with ECC 6.0) While Creating Manual Service PO in SRM i am getting the below mentioned error messages. Can any one suggest what could be the problem.
Error Msgs:
1. Backend Error:In case of account assignment, please enter acc. assignment data for item
2. Backend Error:Purchase order still contains faulty items
Regards,
Mohan

Hi,
Yes i given all CC and GL information properly in Purchase Order Document for Service.. Still finding the error for Service PO alone.
Pl do the needful
Regards,
Mohan

PO output for Extended classic Scenario from the R/3 backend

Hi,
1) Does the PO output (ignoring the config maintained in SRM server 5.5 for the output) through R/3 backend is standard or it is mandatory to give local outputs from SRM only incase of Extended classic scenario?
Regards,
DV

Hi Anil,
We are working on extended classic scenario with SRM 5.0 & ECC6.0.
Please explain how we can take "PO output for Extended classic Scenario from the R/3 backend ".
Please send the related document to [email protected]
Thanks in advance
Ashutosh

Extended Classic Scenario - Free Items?

Does SAP support PO's in Extended Classic Scenario with a zero price (free items)?
My client is switching from classic to extended classic scenario and they require to be able to creaet PO's that have a zero price like they have in the classic scenario.
We are currently getting an error that we need a price with the IR flag, but I would expect the system to automatically unflag the IR flag for a free item?

Hi Jay,
Thanks for your response. There are two problems with your soluiton. First the shopping cart doesn't have the IR flag on it and can't be changed by the user and we have PO's created directly from SC's and go out to the vendor.
Second, In extended classic scenario it apprears that the system doesn't allow you to change the ir flag on the PO and make the cooresponding change in the ERP PO.

ASN for extended classic scenario

Hello all,
we have SRM with extended classic scenario (EBP-MM),
is it possible to use ASN (shipping notification) functionality in our system ?
Kind regards,
Arthur

Hi
ASN can be created by the vendor in SUS system for that XI mapping is required. ASn can be created in SUS by any vendor users. I guess it's not possible with ECS.
Please check the SAP Consulting Note 1026638 GR Output Integration with MM-SUS Scenario for R/3 <= 47
You need to have functional background for this:
To create an ASN against PO or SA release:
1. you need to compulsarily put how much qty you are sending against the reqd. qty(shown by PO / SA )
2. dispatch vehicle no. (optional)
3. road challan no. (optional)
4. one more optional entry ( sorry I forgot)
Useful related pointers ->
Re: how does the GR get into SUS---MM-SUS Sceanario
ASN in Extended Classic Scenario with SUS
SUS ASN & Invoice
The specified item was not found.
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Payment term key with limit days in Extended Classic Scenario

Hello,
We have an SRM 4.0 implementation (SRM Server 5.0 with Support Package
9) using the Extended Classic Scenario.
When a shopping cart is created, it must be approved, and then a
purchase order is generated (first locally at SRM, and then is
replicated to the backend).
The problem is that the payment term key (field at header level EKKO-
ZTERM) of the backend purchase order is empty, only in cases when we use a payment term key which have several different values for the
field "limit days" (T052-ZTAGG in backend, BBP_PAYTERM-ZTAGG in SRM).
Example:
 ZTERM ZTAGG
 K180 09
 K180 19
 K180 31
If the payment term key selected has no several values for the field "limit
days" (one single entry), the payment term key arrives correctly at the backend purchase order.
Example:
 ZTERM ZTAGG
 E000 00
In SRM table BBP_PAYTERM we have upload the backend payment terms
(using report BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS). In other threads it is said that you must copy the entries generated by the report with the logical system of the SRM system, but in extended classic scenario it seems to be not necessary.
We have already implemented note 846009, in order to use always the backend payment term, but the error didnt get resolved.
We have our vendor business partners mapped to the local and backend
purchasing organizations, but it is only necessary indicate the Payment term key for the Backend Purchasing Organization.
Regards

hi,
Pls see the foll notes:
Note 576349 - Terms of payment in the ECS
Note 541934 - Modification note: Copying base date from T052
Note 953999 - ECS: Terms of Payment values not in PO header
Note 940453 - Backend payment term data not updated in the extended PO
Note 945018 - Incoterms data not transferred to the back end
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

'BAPI_POEC_CREATE' function doesn't work with extended classic scenario

Hi everybody.
Antecedents:
We are working in an extended classic scenario.
When we create a Purchase Order via ITS in SRM, the system works ok, the PO is replicated in the ERP system.
But when we execute BAPI_POEC_CREATE function module in order to create a PO in SRM, no message are available in the application monitor, but the PO is not replicated in the ERP system.
Both exampled were created with exactly same data (partners, items, categories, accounts, )
Moreover when we modify the second PO created via ITS, the systems doesnt show any error message, we can order our PO again without error, but the PO isnt replicate in the ERP system.
1. We executed BAPI_POEC_GETDETAIL function module, and there is only a difference between POs, E_PO_STATUS table.
PO created by transaction has 8 entries:
       I1009 X
       I1015 X
       I1021
       I1038
       I1039 X
       I1043
       I1080 X
       I1180
And PO created by BAPI has 5 entries:
       I1015 X
       I1021
       I1038
       I1043
       I1180
2. We run BBP_PD transaction, and there is only a difference.
PO created by transaction mode shows:
- Message: W BBP_PD 830 Default values have been taken from Vendor PRUEBA10/purchasing organization Área Global Compras (org. compras)
And PO created by BAPI
- Message: No Messages
Could anyone help me with the problem?
Thanks in advance.
Raúl.

Hi Raúl,
this is exact, BAPI_POEC_CREATE is designed to create local PO.
If you want to replicate it to R/3, then you have to change it to an ECS PO.
In BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, called at the real beginning of BBP_PD_PO_CREATE, you will have to change some data to enable the ECS scenario:
- change header subtype to EP
- change header log system to SRM (keep FI LS as is)
- determine a backend purch group & org
- complete BE fields (be_object_id, be_object_type, don't change be_log_system because it will be determined during the transfer, be_pur_org and be_pur_group will also be determined during the transfer)
- ... and maybe other R/3 relevant fields
Compare both PO one by one, and adapt the gaps.
Rgds
Christophe
PS: please reward points for helpfull answers

Use of Purchase info records in SRM SC in Extended Classic scenario

Hi All,
We have implemented SRM 7.13 with Extended classic scenario. If we have Purchase info record in SAP ECC for the material, it gets populated in SRM SC in Source of supply Tab but the price of Purchase info record does not get updated in the SC line item.
Can anyone let me know which configurations is required to fetch the Purchase info record price or we need to have a customization to achieve this.
Thanks,
Ankur

HI Ankur
when you say the price did not get updated did you check the sequence which is used for price determination ?
1. User entry
2. Contracts
3. Info record
If still you think it is an issue please check the report EBP_GET_BACKEND_PRICES and let me know if your problem gets fixed?
Regards
Vinita

Extended Classic Scenario PPOMA_Purchasing Org and Group

Hi gurus,
We are working with SRM 5.5 and we are having problems with the assignments for the Purchasing organization and Purchasing groups in the PPOMA.
In the documentation it says we should have one box for the R3 Purchasing Organization (flagged and referred to the backend POrg) and one for the Local Purchasing Organization (flagged but NOT referred to the backend POrg). The same for the Purchasing Groups, the one under R3 POrg will be flagged and referred to the PGroup in R3 and the one under the Local POrg will have the flag but it will not be referred to the backend PGroup.
Afterwards, in the attributes for the Local POrg and Local PGroup, with the attributes PURCH_ORGX and PURCH_GRPX the local and the R3 POrg and PGroup will be assigned each other.
The purchasers will be located in the Local PGroup. The R3 POrg and PGroup will never have users assigned.
The problem is that all the workflow is only working if the "Local" POrg and Group have the backend purchasing organization and purch group assigned in the Function Tab. This means that the 2 boxes for R3 are no longer necessary. In the documentation it says that this version of SRM needs both boxes for the POrgs and the 2 boxes for the PGroups. We have flagged the Extended Classic Scenario.
Any help on this? It's because of the version?
Many thanks and regards,
I will give Points!

Hi Ana
PURCH_GRP     Purchasing group     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as local purchasing group in the organizational plan.
This attribute is simulated. You define an organizational unit as company on the Function tab.
PURCH_GRPX     R/3 purchasing group     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as the R/3 purchasing group in the organizational plan. The value contains the ID and the associated backend system of a backend purchasing group.
This attribute is simulated. You define the ID and the associated system on the Function tab.
PURCH_ORG      Purchasing organization     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as local purchasing organization in the organizational plan.
This attribute is simulated. You define an organizational unit as purchasing organization on the Function tab.
PURCH_ORGX     R/3 purchasing organization     Number of an organizational unit that is indicated as the R/3 purchasing organization in the organizational plan.
This attribute is simulated. You define the ID and the associated system on the Function tab.
can you elaborate more?
in ECS also we can map the backend purchase organisation/ purchase group for purchasing activity.
there might be a resposibilty tab for the backend purchase group might be mapped the responsible purchaser list (dept).plz check it up
regards
Muthu
regards
Muthu

Extended classic scenario triggered on company code

Good morning,
I have a system with SRM 5.0. I would like to have both classic and extended classic scenario, I know that it is possible to activate extended classic only for a product category with BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI , but my question is: Is it possible to activate it for a company code? If yes, is it with the same BADI ?
Thanks in advance
Charlotte

Hi
Before talking about de-activating ECS or not in this BADI, this scenario must first be activated.
This is done via the customizing point "Activate ECS": just flag the check-box, and all you classic items (i.e. those for which a backend has been determined) become extended classic.
Here is the SRM - IMG path:
SRM Server --> Cross-Application Basic Settings --> Activate Extended Classic Scenario.
You can then fine-tune the scenario by using the BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI.
Note- The BADI BBP_EXTLOCAL_PO_BADI can be used to activate the classic scenario based on the proguct categories .
You can choose to have the 3 scenarios working on the same SRM system depending on product category (standard) or any other business rule through the BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI. The BADI is mandatory if you want the Classic and the Extended Classic to work together
Exactly, this BADI allow you to implement your own business rule for backend determination in a multiple Backends environment (Standard customizing is only based on Product categories)
As soon as you use BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI , you don't have to use the ECS scenario activation customizing point (the rule is overwritten with the BADI result). The BADI BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS will only help in your case, if you have several Backend where to create PO documents.
PS: be aware that in ECS scenario you will no longer be able to create PR or reservations in R/3.
Other related links ->
Classic Scenanio and Extended Classic Scenario
Extended Classic vs Standalone
Re: Calssic or Extended Classic Scenario - BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI
Classic / Extended Classic Scenario for Shopping Cart
Re: Classic Scenanio and Extended Classic Scenario
Re: Switching from Classic to Extended Classic
Re: Calssic or Extended Classic Scenario - BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI
Change from ECS to Classic Scenario
Re: Changing the Global Control of Extended Classic Scenario
Re: Technical Scenario Switch: From Standalone To Extended Classic
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Extended classic scenario local PO Output status

Hello all ,
Need some inputs on extended classic scenario local PO Output.
My requirement is , when ever the put get process successfully in SRM , I need to send a mail to requester saying that u201C for this particular output got processed successfully u201C
I have business requirement, we need to run this report every 30 min, This report has to pull out the all the PO number from the current time to past 30 min, for the output got processed successfully.
To meet this requirement, I am using the output log entry table PPFTTRIGG where we can see the all the PO with the status and time stamp also.
But some how, this table maintaining incorrect time stamp.
Ex: If I create PO, process the PO output, and if I see the time stamp for this PO, its showing as 10 min before the current time.
Did anybody come across this issue? Or can anybody suggest me any alternative approach for this.
I mean is there any function module/ table available, which will give PO Output status also.
Can you please give me any pointers for this?
Seeking your help on this.
Wish you a advance happy new year.
Thank you.

Hi Latha,
Did you have a look at the standard report RSPPFPROCESS. For PO's please pass the below selection screen values along with the appropiate date & time details:
Application = BBP_PD
Action Profile = BBP_PD_PO
Then regarding the time difference, please make sure that the application server time is sync with the actual time of the time-zone. This could also be a reason.
Then what you can do is to clone the RSPPFPROCESS program and add the email notification logic on that.
Please have a look at the BADI BBP_PROCESS_PO, this can be of some help for your requirement.
Hope this solves your problem.
Regards
Kathirvel

Extended Classic Scenario - PO Update issue

Hello experts.
We are working with SRM 5 in the extended classic scenario and we have a serious problem in a productive environment for the following case.
(01) We create a purchase requisition (PR) in R/3 with several items;
(02) We send PR to the SRM generating a shopping cart;
(03) The buyer creates a PO for all items from the shopping cart;
(04) The PO is transmitted to R/3;
(05) For some cases buyer changes the PO wich is sent back (updated) to R/3;
So far so good. The problem happens when some item in the request already has GR or Invoice. In those cases when the PO is updated on SRM, its transmission to R/3 does not occur, generating an error log that can be seen in transaction RZ20 of SRM.
I understand that if any GR or Invoice exists for the item it can no longer be modified, but is it expected that no other item can also be modified from SRM? What is the expected behavior for this case?
Moreover, even if the GR and Invoice have been canceled, we are still unable to update the PO in R/3 from SRM. Is this a expected behavior? It was our understanding that the PO should be updated if all incoming documents (GR, Invoice, SES ..) were completely canceled.
We appreciate any help on this matter.
Thanks and Regards,
Evandro Miasato

Hi, Masa,
Thank you for your advice,
I set the method U:Print Using Berkeley Protocol, after that
in trx. SP01 I have the Error Status on Composite Document -
Status Incorrect (Reason Unknown).
Best regards,
Guzal.

Number range for extended classic scenario

Hi,
we've activated extended classic scenario for some defined categories (material groups), other will use classic scenario as before. It works, we are able to craete POs in both ways. I've tried to use the same number range for backend POs and for local POs. I've set the same number for both ranges but only the one which is used is getting updated. Is it possible to syncronize these ranges so backend POs will all be created in the same range?
Regards
Hubert

Hi Hubert,
Not the best practice that you are following. it might work for some time but will fail for most of the time . The maintenance is going to be huge and you could expect problem with these.
I would suggest not to think on the solution of same number range itself.
Thanks
Iftekhar Alam

Status I1113 missing in SC in Extended classic scenario using TA BBP_POC

Hi all,
I am using SRM in extended classic scenario (ECS) (SRM Server 5.5) SP09.
1. Scenario (without any problems)
Shopping carts have been succesfully replicated from R/3 with standard report
BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER.
transfered to Sourcing Cockpit.
No problems at all using standard Sourcing Cockpit -> POs are replicated to R/3, status correctly transfered into Shopping Carts (Status I1113 after creating a PO out of SC).
2. Scenario (problems concerning Status I1113 in SC)
Shopping carts have been succesfully replicated from R/3 with standard report
BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER.
transfered to Sourcing Cockpit.
Shopping carts are manually transfered into a local PO by using standard transaction BBP_POC (create PO) -> function "Add shopping cart item" within item data
Local PO is created without any problem, sucessfully replicated to R/3 and if I start the Monitor for shopping carts I get all the detailed information (follow on documents) -> PO number etc.
Problem: If I use TA BBP_POC and add these shopping carts to PO positions, the status I1113 is not written to SC after executing BBP_GET_STATUS_2 and CLEAN_REQREQ_UP .
The SC remains in Status I1106 (Shopping Cart ordered) / I1129 (approved)
I cant find any entries in table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB and the shopping carts have been removed from SoCo after creating a PO out of it...
Does anybody uses Transaction BBP_POC in ECS and adds Shopping Carts to POs?
Any Idea why the status for these SCs is just I1106 "Shopping Cart ordered" but status I1113 "Follow-on Document Created" is missing/not updated?
Best regards,
Andreas

Hi
Please go through the SAP OSS Notes below ->
Note 1053433 Extended classic: Incorrect status shown in check status
Note 730239 Check status: Missing Backend reference
Note 819094 shopping cart monitor:Update status after resubmit shop.cart
Note 825761 Report program for shopp. cart status update after resubmit
Note 768164 Multiple SCs via SoCo are processed incorrectly
Note 729967 Shoppng cart:Status I1111,no follow-on docs->analysis report
Note 728536 Shopping cart: Follow-on docs => analysis-/correction report
Note 704941 EBP 3.0: Status error in SC extractor
Note 486246 Incorrect shopping carts offered for confirmation
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Problem in Extended Classic Scenario related to PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for