Inbound 850.

hey,
   when i post the inbound 850, i get the status code 51 with the message
I have configured the EDPAR TABLE also.
"Partner number 0010000134 for customer 0681131002813 , partner function WE does not exist."
Message no. VG140
Diagnosis
An error arose while assigning a new key to a partner number in the EDI-IDoc (intermediate document); an entry with the specified key does not exist.
please advice.

Inbound parameters are configured in we20.
to the incoming idocs we assign a process code and inturn its assigned to a function module.this function module creates the app documents in sap.
for example for ORDERS we assign process code ORDE inturn its assigned a fn module IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS.

Similar Messages

  • Error in Processing Inbound 850 Doc  - AIP-50547

    I am having a problem with setting up my 850 - 997 transaction. I receive the following error after placing the 850 file in the pick up location.
    Any one have any helpful suggestions on what could be causing this error and how to fix it.
    Yogendra
    Machine Info: (org-appsdev1.sybrondental.com)
    Description: Unable to identify the trading partner agreement from the given input values. Also verify agreement effectiveToDate
    StackTrace:
    Error -: AIP-50547: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party[NAME] "HEN_KRC_4010", To party[NAME] "Sybron Dental Specialties", Business action name "null"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementNameByBaTPName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2039)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:173)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:483)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processIncomingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:225)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1515)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:2007)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:1939)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:1897)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:463)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:335)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)

    Update: I am trying to use the interchange ID to get the proper Business Action and have set that parameter in the tip.properties file. Here is the log file
    with out first few lines which is the data file.
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:360: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processIncomingMessage Identify Business Protocol
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:360: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processIncomingMessage Do Unpack using the BP specific package class
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:360: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) MimePackaging:unpack:Enter
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:360: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) MimePackaging:doUnpack:Enter
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:361: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) MimePackaging:unpackNonMimeMessage:Enter
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:361: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) MimePackaging:unpackNonMimeMessage:oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.packaging.Component@2af8f5
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:361: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) MimePackaging:unpackNonMimeMessage:Exit
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:361: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) MimePackaging:unpack:Exit
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:361: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processIncomingMessage Decode the Incoming Message into B2B Message
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:361: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.exchange.generic.GenericExchangePlugin:GenericExchangePlugin:decodeIncomingMessage Enter
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:361: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.exchange.generic.GenericExchangePlugin:GenericExchangePlugin:decodeIncomingMessage Number of Components = 1
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:362: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.exchange.generic.GenericExchangePlugin:decodeIncomingMessage Transport Protocol = {FTP}
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:362: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.exchange.generic.GenericExchangePlugin:decodeIncomingMessage filename = blahblah.850
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:362: Thread-20: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-51505: General Validation Error
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.exchange.generic.GenericExchangePlugin.decodeIncomingMessage(GenericExchangePlugin.java:186)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1164)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:2007)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:1939)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:1897)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:463)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:335)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:362: Thread-20: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-51505: General Validation Error
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.exchange.generic.GenericExchangePlugin.decodeIncomingMessage(GenericExchangePlugin.java:186)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1164)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:2007)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:1939)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:1897)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:463)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:335)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:362: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from null to TPName: null Type: null Value: null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:362: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.exchange.generic.GenericExchangePlugin:decodeIncomingMessage fromParty = null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:363: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setFromPartyId() changing from null to TPName: null Type: null Value: null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:363: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setToPartyId() changing from null to TPName: null Type: null Value: null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:363: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.exchange.generic.GenericExchangePlugin:GenericExchangePlugin:decodeIncomingMessage security info NULL
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:364: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.exchange.generic.GenericExchangePlugin:GenericExchangePlugin:decodeIncomingMessage Exit
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:364: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processHubMessage Enter
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:364: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processHubMessage toTP null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:364: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processHubMessage hubUrl null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:364: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processHubMessage Exit
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:364: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processIncomingMessage ProtocolCollabId = null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:365: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processIncomingMessage CollaborationName null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:365: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:checkDuplicate Enter
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:365: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:checkDuplicate check non-RosettaNet Message
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:365: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:365: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: queryWireMessage
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:370: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: queryWireMessage
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:370: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:checkDuplicate Exit
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:371: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processIncomingMessage Protocol Collaboration Id : null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:371: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:identifyIncomingDocument Enter
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:501: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:ISelectorImpl Enter
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:501: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:ISelectorImpl validateEnvelope = false
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:501: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:ISelectorImpl Leave
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:502: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:cloneSelector Enter
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:03:502: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:cloneSelector Return = oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl@13ec2dd
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:500: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Param Name = SeverityConfig
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:500: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Value = null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:510: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode ISA Key = InterchangeSenderID Val = 012430880
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:510: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode ISA Key = InterchangeSenderQual Val = 01
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:510: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode standard = X12
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:511: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode ISA Key = InterchangeReceiverID Val = 7145167811
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:511: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode ISA Key = InterchangeControlVersion Val = 00400
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:511: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode ISA Key = InterchangeReceiverQual Val = 12
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:511: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode Group Key = GroupSenderID Val = 012430880
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:511: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode X12 Doc Revision : 004010
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:511: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode X12 Doc Revision : 4010
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:511: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode Group Key = GroupReceiverID Val = 7145167811
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:511: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode Transaction Count = 1
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:511: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:processNode DocType = 850
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:511: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:traceParameters Parameter InterchangeReceiverQual = 12
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:511: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:traceParameters Parameter InterchangeSenderID = 012430880
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:512: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:traceParameters Parameter InterchangeReceiverID = 7145167811
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:512: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:traceParameters Parameter GroupReceiverID = 7145167811
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:512: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:traceParameters Parameter InterchangeControlVersion = 00400
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:512: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:traceParameters Parameter GroupSenderID = 012430880
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:512: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:traceParameters Parameter InterchangeSenderQual = 01
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:512: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:512: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: queryTradingPartnerIdentificationType
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:513: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: queryTradingPartnerIdentificationType
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:515: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from TPName: HEN_KRC_4010 Type: null Value: null to TPName: HEN_KRC_4010 Type: null Value: null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:515: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:515: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: queryTradingPartnerIdentificationType
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:516: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: queryTradingPartnerIdentificationType
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:517: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:identifyIncomingDocument overwrite FromTP : TPName = HEN_KRC_4010
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:518: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.EDIDocumentPlugin:identifyIncomingDocument exit
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:518: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Correlation:incomingCorrelate Enter
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:518: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Correlation:incomingCorrelate msginfo reftomsgid is null, nothing to correlate
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:518: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Correlation:incomingCorrelate Exit
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:518: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processIncomingMessage number of b2b messages 1
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:518: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processIncomingMessage msgtype = 1
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:518: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processIncomingTPA() Begin TPA Processing..
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:518: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() PARTIES (before calling processParty) :
    initial : null
    from : TPName: HEN_KRC_4010 Type: null Value: null
    to : TPName: Sybron Dental Specialties Type: null Value: null
    final : null
    initiating : TPName: HEN_KRC_4010 Type: null Value: null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:518: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() direction is incoming
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:518: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() calling processparty with : TPName: Sybron Dental Specialties Type: null Value: null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:518: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() Begin..
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:519: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:519: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: queryTradingPartner
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:520: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: queryTradingPartner
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:520: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() Sybron Dental Specialties is hosted party
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:520: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() End..
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:520: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() after calling processparty : TPName: Sybron Dental Specialties Type: null Value: null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:520: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() PARTIES (after calling processParty):
    initial : null
    from : TPName: HEN_KRC_4010 Type: null Value: null
    to : TPName: Sybron Dental Specialties Type: null Value: null
    final : null
    initiating : TPName: HEN_KRC_4010 Type: null Value: null
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:520: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) setRuntimeActiveandQuiescing()
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:520: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() docTypeName: 850 docTypeRevision: 4010
    2007.11.05 at 14:51:04:520: Thread-20: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:null

  • Item text not getting copied into sales order from inbound Idoc

    Hi All,
    I have a scenario where in we get the sales order created through a inbound 850 idoc .
    The trading partner sends the sales order information which gets through GENTRAN and gets posted as inbound idoc in SAP .
    The problem here is that ,there are segments with values for item text in the idoc ,but the item text is not getting carried over to the sales order which is getting created because of this idoc.
    There is no problem with the header text and it is present both at the idoc as well as the sales order level.
    I have checked the configuration for text determination and everything looks fine .
    Please let me know has anyone come across a scenario like this .This is important as our EDI is getting failed when an outbound 810 is sent from SAP for the simple reason that there is no item text .
    Thanks
    Sridhar

    Hello Sridhar
    Do you have access to the genuine 850 EDI message? Does it contain the item texts? If so then there is probably a problem with the (XSLT) mapping EDI 850 -> ORDERS.ORDERS05 IDoc.
    Are you able to test the mapping independent of the EDI transmission? This way you could nail down the problem.
    Regards
       Uwe

  • Issue with EDI_X12_850 Inbound

    Hi,
    I am trying to perform Inbound transaction [ EDI_X12_4010_850]  in Oracle B2B. In this case XYZ and ABC are the host and remote trading partners respectively.
    On the Administration--> Listening Channel page, I have created a listening channel with name "ABC" and placed the EDI file "ABC_4010_850.dat" in the channel.
    Also , created a SOA composite having Oracle B2B Receive [ 850 ] as an Inbound process and succesfully deployed the same. Once the file is picked from the channel ABC an xml file [ xml file having data as that of EDI ]
    is getting generated in the host channel location. But the SOA composite is not getting trgiggered.
    Any suggestions please
    Thanks
    Surya

    Hi ,
    Thanks for your reply.
    SOA composite is not getting triggered, I do not see any instance for this composite [ composite which has Oracle B2B inbound [ 850] ]
    In the Application Message i could see the state of the message as "COMPLETE" but it does not have any information of the composite [ as the composite did not get triggered ]
    Could you please let me know the workaround for this issue.
    Thanks
    Surya

  • "Empty document Found" error while sending a text file

    Below is the error I'm getting while I'm trying to send a txt file using a fiel adapter.
    Channel FILE_TLE_Sender_SalesOrder_CC: Converted complete file content to XML format.
    Channel FILE_TLE_Sender_SalesOrder_CC: Empty document found - proceed without sending message.
    File "/data/TLE/XS1/inbound/850/Test_SalesOrder_3064_12-15-10.txt" deleted after processing.
    On the Communication Channel this is what I have:
    Recordset Name: DOCUMENT_ROOT
    Recordset Structure: DOC_HEADER,1,PO_HEADER,1,TAX,,FREIGHT,,SPECIAL_SHIP,,DOCUMENT_NOTE,,SHIP_TO_ADDRESS,,PRODUCT,,LINE_SHIP,,LINE_ITEM_NOTE,,ASSOC_LINE,,ORDER_MEMO,,DOC_TRAILER,1
    Key Field Name: keyfield
    DOC_HEADER.fieldNames    Value: keyfield,Source_System,Source_SUB_System,Source_Doc_Type,Source_Doc_Gen_Date,Source_Doc_Gen_Time,Source_Company,Source_Division,Source_Party_ID,Source_Ship_Location,Source_Sell_Location,Event_Name,Application_Program_File,Application_Program_Name,Destination_System,Destination_SUB_System,Destination_DOC_Type,Destination_Company,Destination_Division,Destination_Party_ID,Destination_Ship_Location,Destination_Sell_Location,Interchange_Control_Number,Group_Control_Number,Document_Control_Number,Date_Translated,Time_Translated,Primary_Key
    DOC_HEADER.fieldFixedLengths  Value: 30,30,30,30,10,4,30,15,30,20,20,8,30,30,30,30,30,30,15,30,20,20,10,10,10,10,4,30
    DOC_HEADER.keyFieldValue        Value: DOC_HEADER
    DOC_HEADER.lastFieldsOptional       Value: YES
    DOC_HEADER.endSeparator           Value: 'nl'
    Then I have same pattern for PO_HEADER, TAX and so on....
    Can someone tell me why this error is happening?  I'm using the same exact parameters in another XI environment and there's no error there.

    > Channel FILE_TLE_Sender_SalesOrder_CC: Empty document found - proceed without sending message.
    > Can someone tell me why this error is happening? 
    Maybe your source file is empty?
    This is exact what the error message says.

  • Item text not populating in sales order

    Hi All,
                 I have a scenario where in we get the sales order created through a inbound 850 idoc .
    The trading partner sends the sales order information which gets through GENTRAN and gets posted as inbound idoc in SAP .
    The problem here is that ,there are segments with values for item text in the idoc ,but  the item text is not getting carried over to  the sales order which is getting created because of this idoc.
    There is no problem with the header text and it is present both at the idoc as well as the sales order level.
    I have checked  the configuration for text determination and everything looks fine .
    Please let me know has anyone come across a scenario like this .This is important as our EDI is getting failed when an outbound 810 is sent from SAP for the simple reason that there is no item text .
    Thanks
    Sridhar

    Hi,
    You can try the following;
    1) Try to run the program RVTEXTE in SE38 or SA38. Enter text object as VBBP, and X* as text name.
    Then in the function enter the value A and test run.
    If you find any values only with X values like XXXXXXXX, then go back and re-execute the program to delete the entry with the  selection criteria X in the function. This program is used to delete any unwanted text that is sticking in the text tables. If this does not solve, then
    2) You can post this in the ABAP forum to get some fast response from the people who can come across the situation. If found no response,
    3) Check the OSS notes, if no information available, then
    4) Put a service note to SAP.
    Regards
    Edited by: Shiva Ram on Sep 11, 2008 10:38 AM

  • Need Help: How to configure/set-up custom interchange code values in B2B

    Hello All,
    Hope everybody is doing well.
    We are currently facing a problem in implementing Inbound 850 Purchase Orders in B2B from one of our Trading Partners (Customer).
    The Customer will be sending us EDI ANSI X12 ver 4010 Purchase Order files, but in the file they are sending a custom GS08 (8th element of GS Segment having Version/Release/Industry Identifier Code) value i.e. "004010RIFMAT".
    The above value is not present in the Standard Code values when we define an ECS using B2B Document Editor.
    Hence the document is failing in B2B since it is not able to identify the Trading Partner.
    If anyone has faced similar issues, I would appreciate if you could let me know on how to configure the same in B2B. Please let me know the steps in detail.
    Thanks In Advance.
    Regards,
    Dibya

    Hello Dibya,
    Can you create a new group ecs with appropriate codelist for GS08 and use it while modelling B2B flow. Make sure to undeploy and validate the agreement.
    Rgds,Ramesh.

  • XPATH condition in Receiver Determination in PI 7.1

    Hi all,
    I'm doing a Inbound 850 Scenario (no BPM involved)...based on the condition for (/LIST/S_ISA/S_GS/S_ST/S_BEG/D_353 = 00) its should either create ORDERS.ORDERS05 or create ORDCHG.ORDERS05 if (/LIST/S_ISA/S_GS/S_ST/S_BEG/D_353 = 04)...I'm giving the condition in interface determination and multiline selected in the Xpath editor
    I'm using PI 7.1 and irrespective of the condition it always creats Orders.Orders05, I have 2 receiver agreements also for both receiving interfaces...
    Any solution on how to debug?
    Thanks,
    Srini
    Edited by: Srinivas Davuluri on May 12, 2009 10:56 AM

    I forgot to give the prefix...mistake from my side

  • Problem with Seeburger Message splitter

    I'm doing a Inbound 850 from VAN...but for now I have a sample file which has 2 orders in it and this is the error I get:
    Information Channel fromFile: Send binary file  "/usr/sap/KPX/COMM/EDI/out_split/850_E2X_1.dat", size 2918 with QoS EO.
    Information MP: entering1
    Information MP: processing local module localejbs/CallBicXIRaBean
    Information SEEBURGER BICXIADAPTER.MODULE Message entered Module (CallBicXIRaBean) and will be passed to the adapter now.
    Information SEEBURGER BICXIADAPTER +++ starting conversion with mapping: See_E2X_ANSIX12_850_V4010 +++
    Information SEEBURGER BICXIADAPTER +++ CONVERSION SUCCESSFUL +++
    Information SEEBURGER BICXIADAPTER.MODULE BIC Module (CallBicXIRaBean) is exiting succesfully.
    Information MP: processing local module localejbs/Seeburger/MessageSplitter
    Warning SEEBURGER/MSGSPLITTER: There is no attachment to split. So there is nothing to do.
    Information SEEBURGER/MSGSPLITTER: Finished splitting!
    I have the set the parameterName "split" to true...
    Any idea why its not splitting?
    Thanks,
    Srini
    Edited by: Srinivas Davuluri on May 13, 2009 10:10 AM

    Hi,
    Seeburger responded and added a patch, but now I'm getting this error:
    Information Channel fromFile: Send binary file  "/usr/sap/KPX/COMM/EDI/out_split/850_E2X_1.dat", size 2918 with QoS EO.
    Information MP: entering1
    Information MP: processing local module localejbs/CallBicXIRaBean
    Information SEEBURGER BICXIADAPTER.MODULE Message entered Module (CallBicXIRaBean) and will be passed to the adapter now.
    Information SEEBURGER BICXIADAPTER +++ starting conversion with mapping: See_E2X_ANSIX12_850_V4010 +++
    Information SEEBURGER BICXIADAPTER +++ CONVERSION SUCCESSFUL +++
    Information SEEBURGER BICXIADAPTER.MODULE BIC Module (CallBicXIRaBean) is exiting succesfully.
    Information MP: processing local module localejbs/Seeburger/MessageSplitter
    Information SEEBURGER/MESSAGESPLITTER: Trying to establish CCI Connection to Message Splitter Adapter
    Information SEEBURGER/MESSAGESPLITTER: Creating CCI Interaction
    Warning SEEBURGER/MESSAGESPLITTER: There is no attachment to split. So there is nothing to do.
    Information SEEBURGER/MESSAGESPLITTER: Finished splitting!
    Information SEEBURGER/MESSAGESPLITTER: Message Splitter Module (CallMessageSplitterXIRaBean) is exiting succesfully.
    Information MP: processing local module localejbs/CallSapAdapter
    Information The application tries to send an XI message asynchronously using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
    Information Trying to put the message into the send queue.
    Information Message successfully put into the queue.
    Information The application sent the message asynchronously using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System. Returning to application.
    Information MP: leaving
    Information File "/usr/sap/KPX/COMM/EDI/out_split/850_E2X_1.dat" deleted after processing.
    Any suggestions??
    Thanks,
    Srini
    Edited by: Srinivas Davuluri on May 14, 2009 11:32 AM
    Edited by: Srinivas Davuluri on May 15, 2009 10:00 AM

  • EDI X12 File Channel Configuration

    Hello B2B Gurus,
    I am trying to configure the following scenario on a single host to simulate trading partner communication using EDI X12 4010 850/810 over File Channels:
    Inbound - 850 PO From RemoteTradingPartner to HostTradingPartner
    I have configured a file delivery channel on the partner configuration screen under the "channels" tab. The channel is named: "RTP_File_Receive_Channel".
    The channel has the following values set:
    Polling Interval: 5
    Folder Name: /home/oracle/b2b/remote/b2b_receive
    Filename Format: %FROM_PARTY%_%DOCTYPE_NAME%_%DOCTYPE_REVISION%*.dat
    Directory Name Format:
    Minimum Age:
    Archival Directory: /home/oracle/b2b/remote/archived_b2b_receive
    I am dropping a file named RemoteTradingPartner_X12_4010_850.dat into the /home/oracle/b2b/remote/b2b_receive folder but for whatever reason, it is not picking it up and sending it to my SOA composite.
    Should I be configuring a listening channel in the Administration tab instead of a delivery channel on the trading partner agreement? The naming convention and direction of channels is a topic that confuses me no matter how many times I go through this.

    Hello Johnny,
    When Oracle B2B receives a transaction either from internal application (outbound) or from a trading partner (inbound), it first identifies the trading partner and then the transaction set. This combination is then used to identify the agreement.
    What segment/element values within the .dat payload are introspected to lookup the appropriate trading partner agreement? If I specify those values in the filename format, does it override what is inside of the payload? In general, how do filename format, directory name format, and payload contents work together to resolve to the correct TP Agreement? What is the order of precedence when these values are specified in all three locations.The method for identifying the trading partner and transaction varies among transport, exchange and document protocols. If file name format is specified in the channel then Directory name format is ignored. If file name format/directory name format does not give info about transaction set (doc type and doc type revision) then payload is used to identify the document and it's version. It depends upon the type of document standard used that which selection criteria should be used. Generally for xml payloads x-path is used to identify a document and for non-xml payloads either start and end position are evaluated or the position of a particular element/string.
    In short if you give all info for identifying an agreement (From tp, Doc type, doc type revision) in file name format/directory name format, then payload will not be checked for identifying any of these.
    Regards,
    Anuj

  • EDI Correlation in B2B

    Brethren,
    Is their anyway that B2B checks for duplicate records? For ex. if the same inbound 850 is send by the trading partner twice with the same control number etc... Can B2B identify it as duplicate and trigger an error message. I highly doubt it.. but just thought of shooting it.. maybe there is a new tip.properties that dev has come-up with !!!
    Any help here would be appreciated !!
    thanks - Shailesh

    Hi Shailesh and Ramesh,
    I working Outbound 855 transaction.
    I have created Business Action 855 and used the same 997(created for 850).
    I have also created the TPA for 855-997 and deployed the configuration.
    I am able to receive the Business event generated in oracle Apps in the BPEL process.
    I have set the AQ-header parameter like following in BPEL process
    FROM_PARTY=GlobalChips
    TO_PARTY=ACME
    DOCTYPE_NAME=855
    DOCTYPE_REVISION=4010
    MSG_TYPE =1
    After this I have enqued it using the AQ adpater with the following details
    QueueName="IP_OUT_QUEUE"
    DatabaseSchema="B2B"
    ObjectFieldName="PAYLOAD"
    PayloadHeaderRequired="true"
    RecipientList="B2BUSER"
    OpaqueSchema="false" .
    Now there is no 855 EDI file getting generated .
    I have also seen the table AQ$IP_QTAB; and I can some entries for the consumer B2BUSER.
    Can you suggest how crack this issue and if I am missing something.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Lalit

  • POI Set up E-Commerce Gateway with OM Automatic Account Creation

    Hello
    We currently use e-Commerce Gateway for outbound 810. Purchase orders
    are entered manually. Customers are defined in order management and
    an EDI location code is established for the Store location and their
    Bill To (Accounts Payable address)
    We're adding inbound 850.
    (1) Some 850 (Replenishment) will have the store location for the ship
    to address
    (2) Other 850 (Drop Ship) will have various ship to addresses because
    we drop ship product at a consumer address instead of a store
    location.
    For case 2, the ship To address will be new, so it won't exist in
    Order Management and there won't be an edi location code set up for
    it. What I should set up in e-Commerce Gateway and the Order
    Management Customer screen to handle this situation? We don't want to
    handle this type of order as an "exception" Your help is appreciated.

    Hello
    We currently use e-Commerce Gateway for outbound 810. Purchase orders
    are entered manually. Customers are defined in order management and
    an EDI location code is established for the Store location and their
    Bill To (Accounts Payable address)
    We're adding inbound 850.
    (1) Some 850 (Replenishment) will have the store location for the ship
    to address
    (2) Other 850 (Drop Ship) will have various ship to addresses because
    we drop ship product at a consumer address instead of a store
    location.
    For case 2, the ship To address will be new, so it won't exist in
    Order Management and there won't be an edi location code set up for
    it. What I should set up in e-Commerce Gateway and the Order
    Management Customer screen to handle this situation? We don't want to
    handle this type of order as an "exception" Your help is appreciated.

  • EDI 855 FIRST_ACK_CODE EXPLANATION REQUIRED

    HI All,
    Does anyone know the secrets to the mystery of the OE_HEADER_ACKS and OE_LINE_ACKS tables in EBS R12Order Mgmt.? Allow me to explain.
    We are implementing EDI to receive inbound orders from our customer. Customer sends an inbound 850 purchase order; we receive via the Oracle e-Commerce Gateway and load into OM as sales orders via the sales order interface.
    For such uploaded SOs, we need to send back an order acknowledgement to the customer via an outbound 855 EDI transmission. Using the seeded EBS 11i functionality, we are able to get the system to populate the acknowledgement tables, OE_HEADER_ACKS and OE_LINE_ACKS, when such EDI orders have been booked.
    But these tables have columns with various codes. For example, the OE_HEADER_ACKS.FIRST_ACK_CODE column may have a value of AC or AT, but what do these seeded codes mean?
    OE_HEADER_ACKS.FIRST_ACK_CODE have values IA,SP,IB,DR,IQ
    I cannot find 1 Metalink doc that explains the purpose or meaning of these codes. I can't find any OAUG white papers that explain either.
    Any help would be appreciated!

    thanks hussein for ur reply,
    I have already seen the above url , but there is no description for the FIRST_ACK_CODE coulmn value such as SP,DR,ID,IQ,IC,IP,IB etc
    Please help me in thIS
    Thanks

  • AK3/AK4 should be recognized by Doc Editor Analyzer?

    Configuring the Document Definition page to validate the payload of an inbound 850 document correctly generates the following error description, and sends the trading partner a 997 document with AK3/AK4 segments that describe the error for the 850 document.
    However, when the 850 document payload is validated using the Document Editor Analyzer no error occurs.
    How can the Analyzer be configured to generate the same error description (AK3/AK4)? Or is this possible?

    Thanks for your answer, do you know if there is something that should be set in the spec editor? because from our tests the file is processed correctly in document editor, but after that, the AK3 and AK4 are present in the 997.

  • Partner number 0010000136 for customer 202154050 , partner function WE does

    hey,
       We i process an inbound 850 Idoc , I get the status message 51 eith the error " Partner number 0010000136 for customer 202154050 , partner function WE does not exist."
    please advise.

    Hi,
    'WE' should be configured for that customer in customization.
    Regards,
    Sujatha

Maybe you are looking for