Inconsistent Response Behaviour
Hi Everyone,
We have a very weird problem here. Our application is a servlet based app using iPlanet Enterprise 4.0 application server. The servlet response acts very inconsistent when we try to change the response type from text/html to something else in the application(to res.setContentType("application/vnd.ms-excel") for example). Sometimes it works but most of the time instead of opening results in MS Excel, output is being rendered as an HTML.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
YM
In order to change the MIME Handling on IE you need to edit the Registry. (Ah the little tool we all love - regedit, and regedit32).
Anyway, just try to figure out where they burried it.
I have found some vary weird things that IE does to HTML and HTTP.
Microsoft does not abide by true HTTP POST rules regarding simple transactions based on the content-encoding of 'x/www-form-urlencoded'
When trying to get the data, IE never sends it. When I changed the type to 'text/plain' it worked!
That's MS for you.
Similar Messages
-
Inconsistant Aggregation Behaviour - Activation Terminated
Dear team,
Iam facing DSO activation failure in daily process chains.
Error Msg:Inconsistant Aggregation Behaviour - Activation Terminated.
data is coming from 2 data sources into one DSO.
I deleted the failed requests from DSO & again upload it from PSA and activate it individuallu...
But in the next day load....activation fails again & I observe that yesterdays requests are also in red.
why does this happen ?
in dso settings --> Activate Data Automatically is checked.
please reply if u need any further info, for better understanding of the issue.
regards
kvHi,
Delete the yesterdays requests as well (which are uploaded from both the data source).
Rerun the delta loads and acttivate them manually.
You probably for got to activate the request yesterday. the step failled in activation so all the requests which are being activated will turn red.
try the above way it might help you.
If we check that option, i guess the data will be activated soon after the load is done.
Not pretty sure about this point. never tried.
Cheers,
Srinath.
Edited by: Srinath Singamsetti on Aug 3, 2009 10:24 AM -
Inconsistent trackpad behaviour compared to iOS
A few days ago I purchased a MacBook Pro, which works perfectly. The only problem I found so far is the trackpad behaviour, which is inconsistent with our iPad and iPhone.
On iOS, when you *swipe down*, you *scroll up* the information you're viewing. It is as if you're putting your finger on the information and literally drag it to the bottom of the window, thus exposing the information above it.
With OSX, when you *swipe down* (using the two finger gesture), you *scroll down* the displayed information. The swipe motion mimics the movement of the scroll bar.
I think the iOS approach is more intuitive and I would like my MBP to behave in the same way. Alas there is no option in the trackpad system preferences to accomplish this ("Inverse gestures").
Any thoughts on thisAlas there is no option in the trackpad system preferences to accomplish this ("Inverse gestures").
True. You'll get used to the way it works.
I have an iPhone and a MBP, and though you're absolutely correct about the difference, I had never even noticed it until you brought it up. -
Inconsistent FileReader behaviour during heavy load
I am using a StreamTokenizer / FileReader to parse the contents of files and have noticed inconsistent results similar to the ones we get during concurrency problems. Only in my case its a single single Thread calling the parser method.
I have run the parser 672 times over the same file and I have a counter that counts the parsed words. Though I would expect the counter to always show the same number, suprisingly it sometimes shows a smaller number !
---1---[227]
---1---[227]
---1---[227]
---1---[227]
---1---[190] <====
---1---[227]
---1---[227]
---1---[227]
---1---[227]
---1---[227]
---1---[227]
---1---[227]
I have the feeling StreamTokenizer.TT_EOL may return EOF prematurely. Then again I need a deterministic way of processing the contents of as many files as needed. How can I make sure my code will always process the same number of tokens for the same file at any given time?
Here the method that produces the inconsistent counts:
public HashMap<String,ArrayList<Long>> parseDocument( Reader _reader
, int _pivDocID
, yxStopList _yxStpLst
, String _filename )
throws FileNotFoundException
, IOException
HashMap<String,ArrayList<Long>> _postingLists = new HashMap<String,ArrayList<Long>>(HASHMAP_INITIAL_SIZE);
ArrayList<Long> _offsets = null;
int _currOffset = 0;
int _numericTokens= 0;
String _token = null;
BufferedReader _buffReader = new BufferedReader(_reader);
StreamTokenizer _st = new StreamTokenizer(_buffReader);
_st.resetSyntax();
_st.ordinaryChars(0,255);
_st.eolIsSignificant(true);
_st.lowerCaseMode(true);
_st.whitespaceChars(',', ',' ); // COMMA
_st.whitespaceChars(' ', ' ' ); // SPACE
_st.whitespaceChars('.', '.' ); // PERIOD
_st.whitespaceChars('\t','\t'); // TAB
_st.whitespaceChars('\n','\n'); // EOL
_st.whitespaceChars('\r','\r'); // EOL
_st.wordChars('a','z');
_st.wordChars('A','Z');
_st.wordChars('0','9');
_st.wordChars('_','_');
scan:
while(true)
try
switch(_st.nextToken())
case StreamTokenizer.TT_WORD :
_token = _st.sval;
if (_token.length() < MINIMUM_ACCEPTABLE_TOKEN_LENGTH) break;
if (_token.length() > MAXIMUM_ACCEPTABLE_TOKEN_LENGTH) break;
if (_token.matches(".*[^a-zA-Z0-9_].*")) break;
if (_token.indexOf("__") > -1) break;
if (_token.matches(".*[0-9].*") && _token.matches(".*[a-zA-Z_].*")) break;
if (!_token.matches("[a-zA-Z_]+"))
if ( !_token.startsWith("0" ) ) break; //only numbers like: 069 456456 or 004916099113815
if ( _token.startsWith("000") ) break;
if ( _token.length() == 4
&& !( _token.startsWith("19")
|| _token.startsWith("20")
|| _token.startsWith("21")) ) break;
if (_token.length() > 20) break;
_numericTokens++;
if (_numericTokens > MAXIMUM_NUMBERS_PER_DOC) break; //do not allow too many numeric tokens per document
}//end of [IF]
if ( _yxStpLst.isStopWord(_token) )
yxL.log(6,"[yxParser -- parseDocument(2)]","","WARNING","REJECTING STOPWORD ["+_token+"] !");
break;
_currOffset++;
if ( !_postingLists.containsKey(_token) )
_offsets = new ArrayList<Long>();
_offsets.add(0,(long)_pivDocID);
_offsets.add(1,(long)_currOffset);
try {
_postingLists.put(_token,_offsets);
}catch(OutOfMemoryError e001){
e001.printStackTrace();
yxL.log(2,"[yxParser -- parseDocument(2)]","","ERROR","OutOfMemory while parsing ["+_filename+"]");
break scan;
}//end of [IF]
else
_offsets = _postingLists.get(_token);
if (_offsets.size() == MAX_OFFSETS_PER_TOKEN) break;
int _prevSumOfOffsets = 0;
for ( int i1 = 1; // ignore i1=0 because i1=0 is the DOCID
i1<_offsets.size(); // loop until end of encoded Offsets
i1++ ) _prevSumOfOffsets += _offsets.get(i1); // sum all existing encoded offsets
_offsets.add(_offsets.size(),(long)(_currOffset - _prevSumOfOffsets));
try {
_postingLists.put(_token,_offsets); // put : replaces existing Key
}catch(OutOfMemoryError e001){
e001.printStackTrace();
yxL.log(2,"[yxParser -- parseDocument(2)]","","ERROR","02 [yxParser] OutOfMemory while parsing ["+_filename+"]");
break scan;
yxL.log(6,"[yxParser -- parseDocument(2)]","","INFO"
,"02 Updating ["+_token+"]["+Arrays.toString(_offsets.toArray())+"]");
break;
case StreamTokenizer.TT_NUMBER: break; // Numbers will be treated as Strings
case StreamTokenizer.TT_EOL : break; // EOL
case StreamTokenizer.TT_EOF : break scan; // EOF
default :
break; // individual 1-char tokens will be ignored
}//end of [SWITCH]
}catch (Exception e){e.printStackTrace();}
}//end of [WHILE]
_buffReader.close();
_reader.close();
_token = null;
_st = null;
_buffReader = null;
_offsets = null;
int _tokensFound = _postingLists.size();
if (_tokensFound < 1)
yxL.log(3,"[yxParser -- parseDocument(2)]","","WARNING","Number of tokens found = ["+_postingLists.size()+"]["+_filename+"]");
if (sh.isIndexable(_filename))
_offsets = new ArrayList<Long>();
_offsets.add(0,(long)_pivDocID);
_offsets.add(1,1L);
try {
_postingLists.put(sh.MANUAL_INDEX_FILE_START,_offsets);
}catch(OutOfMemoryError e001){
e001.printStackTrace();
yxL.log(2,"[yxParser -- parseDocument(2)]","","ERROR","OutOfMemory2 while parsing ["+_filename+"]");
}//end of [IF]
else
yxL.log(4,"[yxParser -- parseDocument(2)]","","INFO","Number of tokens found = ["+_postingLists.size()+"]");
COUNT_TOTAL_WORDS += _postingLists.size();
System.out.println("---1---["+_postingLists.size()+"]");
yxL.log(6,"[yxParser -- parseDocument(2)]","END");
return _postingLists;
}Yes. there is a GUI involved. The Gui participated in this only by triggering the parsing process through the click of a button. The parser receives its input from a Vector which contains fully qualified filenames.
Each filename is used to instantiate a FileReader Object. This in turn is passed on to the parser method shown above. The inconsistency is located in the method above. I have already searched for days to reach to this conclusion. I was taking for granded that the stream would be read till EOF is reached, but this is not always the case. The method shown above is re-run over 600 times and 2% of the time it return 10-20 words less. !! -
Implementing synchronous request response behaviour with JMS
i have a requirement wherein i send a list of tasks to be executed (this has to be executed in parallel so taking the JMS route) and should wait for the results of al these tasks. How could i do this with JMS? I need JMS since the originally these tasks was being done using threading and since in j2ee it is not advisable to spawn threads we are planning to use JMS so that we can have concurrency that is done by the container. can someone please tell how can i simulate this synchronous request-response paradigm using JMS?
It may not be great idea however possibility of State full session bean can be explored.
State full session bean will send all 100 tasks to JMS queue without waiting for the result. There will be another JMS program (Say ResponseCollector) which will listen on queue for all responses. Once ResponseCollector collects all the responses, it will trigger the state full session bean again.
You can use some properties in JMS header to discriminate between the request and response on same queue and apply the message selector. -
Inconsistent font behaviour between reflow and chrome
Having seen previous threads regarding inconsistent font behavior caused by copied and pasted text containing hidden styling tags, I tried to find a way of quickly stripping out the tags.
Copied client text from word.
Used paste special - text only - to drop text into Dreamweaver CC design view. Entered code view and deleted invisible tags. Copied text from code view and pasted into Edge Reflow.
Styled text in Reflow - paragraph breaks, shift returns and emboldened headings. Saved and previewed in Chrome - still not showing bold headings (arial).
So, deleted text box in reflow, and redrew. Switched to Dreamweaver and copied text from code view with <p> and <br> tags as needed.
Returned to reflow and pasted into text box. Immediately black screen and no way to do anything. Had to force quit and restart from saved reflow project file.
Same thing happens upon repeating.
What can I do to get the reflow typography to preview properly in chrome? Really frustrated by this issue.
Many thanks in advance for any suggestions...Thanks very much for this bug. I can reproduce it on my end. I've filed it for our team to take a look at.
I'll try and update if we find a fix. -
ITunes 8 'odd non-responsive behaviour' when trying to log in to Store
Whenever I try and use any of the functions of iTunes 7.x or 8 and the iTunes store (e.g. signing in an account, attempting to create a new account) or enabling Genius in iTunes 8, iTunes becomes unresponsive in a distinctly odd fashion.
I can still access the iTunes store, browse music etc., but anything that requires authentication, it seems, causes the store to stop responding. Once thestore has decided to become unresponsive, I can't browse the store any further, but can still use the rest of iTunes (e.g. my own library...) The 'information window' (for want of a better word: where song information is usually displayed at the top centre of the iTunes window) shows "Accessing iTunes Store..." and the crosshatched progress bar, which then doesn't change into the solid progress bar as normal. iTunes can be used normally, but refuses to close, and requires Task Manager to kill it.
I'm running iTunes 8 on Win XP SP 2 (originally iTunes 7.x, which had the same problem -- I had naively thought an upgrade might fix it!). I've tried simple things like disabling the Windows Firewall, don't to the best of my knowledge have any other firewalls running, and have tried killing anything other than the vital system processes in Task Manager and the Windows Services Viewer thingy.
I must admit to being slightly worried: my new iPhone arrives in a few days and I'd quite like to be able to get the App Store etc running...!
(edited to add: I've tried running the iTunes network diagnostics, which crashed iTunes properly, to the point at which the whole program stopped responding and needed killing in Task Manager -- I'm sorry that's not going to be much use..!)
Message was edited by: srg40ive been having odd behavior for my itune store too. whenever i try to access it, all the info loads like normal but if i click on any thing it freaks out and all the info for the songs and everything just freaks out. it becomes like it was made by a five year old on microsoft word. there are no images, there is only a picture of a link of chain and one of the chains is broken. i can still read the title, the price and the artist but, they are all in a wierd font size.
i still have access to everything but i am reluctant to click on anything because i dont want it to spread to my itunes. this just started today and was working fine before
is there anything i can do about it and it it safe for me to do anything? -
Curious But Avoidable Incosistent Behaviour By BT8...
There appears to be an inconsistency in the way in which elements of the BT8500 Advanced Call Blocker function in respect of telephone numbers that share the same STD code as the PSTN line to which the BT8500 has been connected, though only when the contact has been stored without the STD code prepended.
When a call is received from such a local contact, the reverse lookup in the Contacts database correctly yields the identity of the contact. In other words, an incoming CLI comprising the concatenation of <STD code><calling party’s number> is successfully matched against a database entry consisting only of <calling party’s number>.
The corresponding matching does not however work for BT Call Guardian, and for it to function correctly, the local contact must have been stored with the STD code prepended.
In fairness the need to store contacts using the full dialling code is made explicit in the product manual, but the inconsistency in behaviour can trap the unwary. In order slightly to hasten the process of dialling a local contact, it is tempting only to enter their number, without the STD code. Superficially this is acceptable, because not only does outgoing dialling work, but when the local contact originates a call they are correctly identified. However, a problem arises when BT Call Guardian is configured to use Custom Mode, with, for example, this set of parameter values:
Blocked numbers = <Block>
Allowed numbers = <Allow>
International = <Announce>
Witheld = <Announce>
Payphones = <Announce>
Mobile numbers = <Allow>
Unavailable = <Announce>
All other numbers = <Announce>
In these circumstances one witnesses the rather ridiculous spectacle of a handset identifying a local caller by name, but subjecting them to the ‘Announce’ sequence, and displaying text on the handset screen to the effect that this has commenced.
Surely the contacts database lookup and the BT Call Guardian function should behave identically, so that either both work, or neither works when a local contact’s number is stored without the STD code. Also it ought to be possible to store local numbers without prepending the STD code in order to minimise the work of data entry and to expedite dialling. Perhaps a solution would be the functionality of the BT8500 to be changed so that it is able to ascertain the STD code associated with the line to which it is connected and having done so, to process call blocking accordingly.Colors are just a convenient way to search on the "label" field. If the label field is blank, and you search on purple which is also blank...
-
Creation of delivery with zero stock
Hello,
I have two SAP system, on both system the OSS note below was implemented:
712516 Delivery item created in spite of VL367 with quantity 0
On the 1st system, when I create a delivery foritem category LZN that has no stocks the system is allowing me, even if
I have set value u201CBu201D in the field u201CCheck quantity 0u201D in customizing/configuration of delivery item category LZN (transaction
0VLP).
While on the 2nd SAP system, it is not allowing me to create the delivery with the same setup of the 1st system.
I tried to compare both systems, but I cannot find the difference on why the 2nd SAP system it is not allowing me to create the delivery.
Is it really possible to still create a delivery for an item category with value u201CBu201D in the field u201CCheck quantity 0u201D in customizing/configuration of a delivery item category(transaction 0VLP)?If yes, could you explain to us how is this possible in SAP?
My objective here is to proceed delivery even with value u201CBu201D in the field u201CCheck quantity 0u201D in customizing/configuration of a delivery item category(transaction 0VLP) was activated.
Thanks & Regards"On the 1st system, when I create a delivery foritem category LZN that has no stocks the system is allowing me, even if
I have set value u201CBu201D in the field u201CCheck quantity 0u201D in customizing/configuration of delivery item category LZN (transaction
0VLP). "
This sounds like inconsistent incorrect behaviour to me. Do you have any user exit / BADI coding influening this? If so, does the issue occur when you skip the custom code? -
I downloaded the recent Muse CC. When opening any Muse project, new or old, it crashes 8 out of 10 times. Sometimes it takes 5 or 6 times to try to open them. I get better results opening the Muse projects directly from my hard drive rather than from Muse. But I also get often program crashes when trying to duplicate Muse pages within the program. The previous version of Muse never gave me these crashes. I am using a brand new 2.8 Ghz i7 MacBook Pro with 16Gb RAM. The crashes happen often on my new iMac as well.
Whats going on? Anyone else having these crash problems?Thank you very much for providing the MuseLog.txt file.
From the log Muse is getting inconsistent responses from your RAID drive for one or more asset files. Literally Muse asks if a particular file exists and the RAID responds, yes. Then Muse acts on that information and attempts to get the modification date of that file and the RAID responds that the file doesn't exist, which results in this error.
Is the RAID drive an external drive directly connected to your computer, or is it a network volume?
I’ve sent this message both via the public forum and as a direct e-mail message. The direct e-mail message has a file attached, MuseLogPrefs.xml. I need you to put that file in your “Documents” folder and quit and relaunch Muse. When the error next occurs, please send me the MuseLog.txt file again (not the MuseLogPrefs.xml). Hopefully the additional information in the log will help identify the specific file (or files) for which this error is occurring.
Thank you.
- Zak -
OS 10.4.6 and display connector
In March I got a G4 Mini to replace my old Mac. In the formidable process of getting all my functions to work on the Mini, I would have to swap computers several times, so I did not screw the connector from my monitor to the adapter on the Mini.
In a month, I removed my old Mac from my desk. In the next two hours, my Mini's response to mouse clicks was a little erratic. Then the screen went blue. I reached back to be sure the display connector was seated.
I restarted and the screen remained blue for several minutes. I restarted again and saw faint flickers of my desktop. In a few minutes the desktop suddenly appeared. I could find no indication of trouble in the logs.
It worked fine for eight days. Then the response to the mouse and keyboard became slightly erratic. The next day I started the computer and told Internet Connect to dial. The screen went blue, but there were a couple of flashes when I saw that Internet Connect was keeping track of my online time.
Six times I restarted and let it sit five minutes with a blue screen. Once I disconnected the power supply for five minutes. I zapped the PRAM. It looked fine on the Install disk, which found no hardware problem, but blue was all I got from the hard drive.
I removed the Mini to use my old Mac to find Apple's phone number. When I hooked up the Mini two hours later, I screwed down the display connector. I had to back out one screw a turn or two so the connector would seat fully and I could engage the screw. The Mini started immediately. The System Log seemed to say that all the startups that day had been normal. I could find no record of a crash in the last few days.
Was the problem ambiguous continuity in the connector? I want to be sure. Is OS 10.4.6 more sensitive to a display connector problem than is the Install disk? Under 10.4.6, can a problem in the display connection cause a misreading of keystrokes and mouse clicks?Welcome to Apple Discussions!
If you "reached back" as you say, you may have
inadvertantly bent the connector plugging it into the
Mini. The bend may be ever so slight as to not be
noticeable, but the computer would be sensitive to
it. When dealing with computer connectors, it is
important to remember to pull them evenly out and
push them evenly in, being observant that the pins
are matching the holes, and not move them at an angle
from each other when the connection is taking place.
What I called "reaching back" was reaching forward. It was after the screen turned blue. I could see the connector on the back of the Mini. I pushed it directly toward the connector on the Mini. Nothing moved, so I assumed it was fully seated. I didn't realize the screw might have been interfering.
Try a different display to see if the connector of
the display itself, or the connector on the Mini is
what is damaged.
I assume screwing the connector down during the second incident has eliminated the possible electrical problem.
Activating the dialup connection may have triggered
the display to go wild if something is wrong with the
connector or cable's shielding. It is unlikely to
happen because the voltages and RF created by the
modem is so little, but I wouldn't say it is
impossible.
Making the dialup connection proved that the computer continued to work after my screen went blue.
The fact the logs say nothing suggests the problem is
more than likely to be just between the connectors
and cable.
That sounds right to me, but I want to understand two loose ends in case something else is wrong:
1. In each incident, why was the first symptom an inconsistent response to mouse clicks?
2. Why did it work fine when I booted from the Install disk?
Your reference to RF may point to the answers. I should look at a pinout to see where the sync pins are in that connector. Suppose the screw was keeping the connection physically open on one side so that a sync pin was barely making contact. If it opened to the point of invisibly tiny sparking, that could have interfered with the click signals of my wireless mouse.
If the connection opened a couple of microns more, I would have lost my sync. I wonder if the loss of a sync signal causes an SVGA CRT monitor to go blue.
Why would I still get a display if I booted from the Install disk? It probably had a different refresh rate and maybe a different scan frequency. In the case the sync voltage may have been high enough to jump the bad connection.
If that's a reasonable explanation, I can feel confident that the only problem was an unscrewed connector. -
Weblogic 8.1 sp4 on Slowwaris 2.7 - Thread dump included
Dear experts,
We have a time response problem within our production environment, following is our configuration :
Oracle 8.1.7.4
Weblogic 8.1 sp4
Solaris Sparc 2.7
JSP is pre-compiled, though the time response behaviour is rather weird, sometime quick and most of the time very slow, that we can not stand with ie. 5 minutes for displaying the mainpage, worse is client IE browser should be shut and restart. Below is the thread dump of our server, we will appreciate if someone can interpret it and possibly lead us to pointers how to solve our problem.
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_05-b04 mixed mode):
"ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x005e1848 nid=0x34 in Object.wait() [ddf81000..ddf819f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe4d0e170> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe4d0e170> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x005e0b38 nid=0x33 in Object.wait() [de081000..de0819f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe4d0d9d0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe4d0d9d0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x005e08f0 nid=0x32 in Object.wait() [de181000..de1819f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe4d0d230> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe4d0d230> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00359820 nid=0x31 in Object.wait() [de281000..de2819f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe4d0ca70> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe4d0ca70> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x0060d850 nid=0x30 waiting for monitor entry [de381000..de3819f0]
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.processSockets(PosixSocketMuxer.java:93)
- waiting to lock <0xe4c822d0> (a java.lang.String)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:32)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:219)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x0060d0c8 nid=0x2f waiting for monitor entry [dea01000..dea019f0]
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.processSockets(PosixSocketMuxer.java:93)
- waiting to lock <0xe4c822d0> (a java.lang.String)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:32)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:219)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x0060cb28 nid=0x2e runnable [deb01000..deb019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe4cac810> (a [Lweblogic.socket.PosixSocketInfo$FdStruct;)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.processSockets(PosixSocketMuxer.java:95)
- locked <0xe4cac810> (a [Lweblogic.socket.PosixSocketInfo$FdStruct;)
- locked <0xe4c822d0> (a java.lang.String)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:32)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:219)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
"ListenThread.Default" prio=5 tid=0x00609978 nid=0x2d runnable [dec01000..dec019f0]
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:353)
- locked <0xe4cb5d80> (a java.net.PlainSocketImpl)
at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:448)
at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:419)
at weblogic.socket.WeblogicServerSocket.accept(WeblogicServerSocket.java:26)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.ListenThread.accept(ListenThread.java:735)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.ListenThread.run(ListenThread.java:301)
"Thread-6" daemon prio=5 tid=0x001d2ab8 nid=0x2c in Object.wait() [df701000..df7019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe6a78a80> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <0xe6a78a80> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'JMS.TimerTreePool'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x001d3b08 nid=0x2b in Object.wait() [dfe01000..dfe019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe6a32e48> (a weblogic.jms.backend.BETimerTree)
at weblogic.jms.backend.BETimerTree.execute(BETimerTree.java:146)
- locked <0xe6a32e48> (a weblogic.jms.backend.BETimerTree)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:219)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
"weblogic.health.CoreHealthMonitor" daemon prio=5 tid=0x004ccf08 nid=0x2a waiting on condition [e0101000..e01019f0]
at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.CoreHealthMonitorThread.run(CoreHealthMonitorThread.java:128)
"Thread-5" prio=5 tid=0x00387728 nid=0x29 in Object.wait() [e0201000..e02019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe66a3f78> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <0xe66a3f78> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"VDE Transaction Processor Thread" prio=2 tid=0x004a1138 nid=0x27 in Object.wait() [e0301000..e03019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe65b97d8> (a com.octetstring.vde.backend.standard.TransactionProcessor)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at com.octetstring.vde.backend.standard.TransactionProcessor.waitChange(TransactionProcessor.java:365)
- locked <0xe65b97d8> (a com.octetstring.vde.backend.standard.TransactionProcessor)
at com.octetstring.vde.backend.standard.TransactionProcessor.run(TransactionProcessor.java:212)
"ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.admin.RMI'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x003cb6b0 nid=0x26 in Object.wait() [e0401000..e04019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe65b9858> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe65b9858> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.admin.RMI'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x003caac0 nid=0x25 in Object.wait() [e0501000..e05019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe65b98d8> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe65b98d8> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.admin.RMI'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x003ca010 nid=0x24 in Object.wait() [e0601000..e06019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe65b9958> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe65b9958> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.admin.HTTP'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x003c9560 nid=0x23 in Object.wait() [e0701000..e07019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe65b99d8> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe65b99d8> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.admin.HTTP'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x003c9318 nid=0x22 in Object.wait() [e0801000..e08019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe65b9a58> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe65b9a58> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"weblogic.security.SpinnerRandomSource" daemon prio=5 tid=0x003c6900 nid=0x21 in Object.wait() [e0901000..e09019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651be08> (a java.lang.Object)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.security.SpinnerRandomBitsSource.run(SpinnerRandomBitsSource.java:60)
- locked <0xe651be08> (a java.lang.Object)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
"weblogic.time.TimeEventGenerator" daemon prio=9 tid=0x003c5958 nid=0x20 runnable [e0a01000..e0a019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651be78> (a weblogic.time.common.internal.TimeTable)
at weblogic.time.common.internal.TimeTable.snooze(TimeTable.java:272)
- locked <0xe651be78> (a weblogic.time.common.internal.TimeTable)
at weblogic.time.common.internal.TimeEventGenerator.run(TimeEventGenerator.java:118)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
"ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.System'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x003c3988 nid=0x1f in Object.wait() [e0b01000..e0b019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651bef0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651bef0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.System'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x001fb810 nid=0x1e in Object.wait() [e0c01000..e0c019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651bf70> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651bf70> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.System'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x001fac20 nid=0x1d waiting on condition [e0d01000..e0d019f0]
at weblogic.platform.SunVM.threadDump0(Native Method)
- waiting to lock <0xe4c7cdd0> (a weblogic.platform.SunVM)
at weblogic.platform.SunVM.threadDump(SunVM.java:106)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.getThreadDump(T3Srvr.java:1184)
at weblogic.common.internal.AdminProxy.execute(AdminProxy.java:220)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.ClientRequest$1.run(ClientContext.java:700)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:147)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.ClientRequest.execute(ClientContext.java:697)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:219)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.System'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x001fa030 nid=0x1c in Object.wait() [e0e01000..e0e019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c070> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c070> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.System'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x001f9440 nid=0x1b in Object.wait() [e0f01000..e0f019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c0f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c0f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x001f8850 nid=0x1a in Object.wait() [e1001000..e10019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c170> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c170> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x001f7c60 nid=0x19 in Object.wait() [e1101000..e11019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c1f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c1f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '12' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x001f7070 nid=0x18 in Object.wait() [e1201000..e12019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c270> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c270> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x001f6480 nid=0x17 in Object.wait() [e1301000..e13019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c2f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c2f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '10' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x001f5890 nid=0x16 in Object.wait() [e1401000..e14019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c370> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c370> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '9' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x004d67b8 nid=0x15 in Object.wait() [e1501000..e15019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c3f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c3f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '8' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x004d5bc8 nid=0x14 in Object.wait() [e1601000..e16019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c470> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c470> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '7' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x004d4fd8 nid=0x13 in Object.wait() [e1701000..e17019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c4f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c4f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x004d43e8 nid=0x12 in Object.wait() [e1801000..e18019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c570> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c570> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '5' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x003b6d70 nid=0x11 in Object.wait() [e1901000..e19019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c5f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c5f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x003b61e8 nid=0x10 in Object.wait() [e1a01000..e1a019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c670> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c670> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x003b57a8 nid=0xf in Object.wait() [e1b01000..e1b019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c6f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c6f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x003b4e08 nid=0xe in Object.wait() [e1c01000..e1c019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c770> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c770> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x005e9030 nid=0xd in Object.wait() [e1d01000..e1d019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c7f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c7f0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'" daemon prio=5 tid=0x005e8e90 nid=0xc in Object.wait() [e1e01000..e1e019f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe651c870> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <0xe651c870> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"Thread-1" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00201230 nid=0xb in Object.wait() [e4981000..e49819f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe637e1d0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:403)
- locked <0xe637e1d0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=10 tid=0x000cdbc8 nid=0x8 runnable [0..0]
"Finalizer" daemon prio=8 tid=0x000ca7b0 nid=0x6 in Object.wait() [fc381000..fc3819f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe6278d78> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:111)
- locked <0xe6278d78> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:127)
at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:159)
"Reference Handler" daemon prio=10 tid=0x000c8e50 nid=0x5 in Object.wait() [fde81000..fde819f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe6278de0> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:115)
- locked <0xe6278de0> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
"main" prio=5 tid=0x00038510 nid=0x1 in Object.wait() [ffbed000..ffbed7dc]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0xe62eeff0> (a weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.waitForDeath(T3Srvr.java:1208)
- locked <0xe62eeff0> (a weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.run(T3Srvr.java:390)
at weblogic.Server.main(Server.java:32)
"VM Thread" prio=5 tid=0x000c8008 nid=0x4 runnable
"VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=10 tid=0x000d0a28 nid=0xa waiting on condition
"Suspend Checker Thread" prio=10 tid=0x000cd260 nid=0x7 runnable
Thanks in advance,
saiful-franceHi All,
It looks like I have the similar problem: I am using Weblogic 8.1 Sp3 platform. please help.
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (1.4.2 1.4.2.03-040401-18:59-PA_RISC2.0 PA2.0 (aCC_AP) mixed mode):
"Login" daemon prio=10 tid=01a0a0b0 nid=17817 lwp_id=1133989 in Object.wait() [0x2da54000..0x2da544f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.doInvoke(DSUser.java:455)
- locked <92588248> (a com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$1$DSAMessageHandler)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.invoke(DSUser.java:506)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$2.run(DSUser.java:712)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
"Login" daemon prio=10 tid=01a09f48 nid=17816 lwp_id=1133988 in Object.wait() [0x2d90f000..0x2d90f4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.doInvoke(DSUser.java:455)
- locked <92580248> (a com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$1$DSAMessageHandler)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.invoke(DSUser.java:506)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$2.run(DSUser.java:712)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
"Login" daemon prio=10 tid=00c40450 nid=17815 lwp_id=1133969 in Object.wait() [0x2ed85000..0x2ed854f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.doInvoke(DSUser.java:455)
- locked <92446368> (a com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$1$DSAMessageHandler)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.invoke(DSUser.java:506)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$2.run(DSUser.java:712)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
"Login" daemon prio=10 tid=00c402e8 nid=17814 lwp_id=1133967 in Object.wait() [0x2db17000..0x2db174f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.doInvoke(DSUser.java:455)
- locked <9242e368> (a com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$1$DSAMessageHandler)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.invoke(DSUser.java:506)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$2.run(DSUser.java:712)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
"AreYouAlive" daemon prio=10 tid=077ca9b0 nid=11502 lwp_id=1080790 in Object.wait() [0x2d950000..0x2d9504f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3fcb3390> (a com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$AreYouAlive)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$AreYouAlive.run(DSUser.java:115)
- locked <3fcb3390> (a com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$AreYouAlive)
"DatagramThread" daemon prio=10 tid=077ca848 nid=11501 lwp_id=1080789 runnable [0x2d991000..0x2d9914f0]
at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive(Native Method)
- waiting to lock <3fcb5458> (a java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
at java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:728)
- locked <3fcb5488> (a java.net.DatagramPacket)
- locked <3fcb54b0> (a java.net.DatagramSocket)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$DatagramThread.run(DSUser.java:169)
"GarbageCollector" daemon prio=10 tid=077ca6e0 nid=11500 lwp_id=1080788 in Object.wait() [0x2d9d2000..0x2d9d24f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3fcb54d0> (a com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector)
at com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector.run(GarbageCollector.java:62)
- locked <3fcb54d0> (a com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector)
"AreYouAlive" daemon prio=10 tid=030802e8 nid=11340 lwp_id=1078923 in Object.wait() [0x2da95000..0x2da954f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3fc90508> (a com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$AreYouAlive)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$AreYouAlive.run(DSUser.java:115)
- locked <3fc90508> (a com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$AreYouAlive)
"DatagramThread" daemon prio=10 tid=03080180 nid=11339 lwp_id=1078922 runnable [0x2dad6000..0x2dad64f0]
at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive(Native Method)
- waiting to lock <3fc925d0> (a java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
at java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:728)
- locked <3fc92600> (a java.net.DatagramPacket)
- locked <3fc92628> (a java.net.DatagramSocket)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$DatagramThread.run(DSUser.java:169)
"GarbageCollector" daemon prio=10 tid=03080018 nid=11338 lwp_id=1078921 in Object.wait() [0x2db58000..0x2db584f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3fc92648> (a com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector)
at com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector.run(GarbageCollector.java:62)
- locked <3fc92648> (a com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector)
"AreYouAlive" daemon prio=10 tid=08005a10 nid=3830 lwp_id=947497 in Object.wait() [0x2db99000..0x2db994f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.login(DSUser.java:736)
- locked <3d4b1aa0> (a java.lang.Object)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.reconnect(DSUser.java:544)
- locked <3d4b19b8> (a com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.invoke(DSUser.java:513)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$AreYouAlive.fire(DSUser.java:95)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$AreYouAlive.run(DSUser.java:117)
"DatagramThread" daemon prio=10 tid=080058a8 nid=3829 lwp_id=947496 runnable [0x2dc1b000..0x2dc1b4f0]
at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive(Native Method)
- waiting to lock <3d4b3b20> (a java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
at java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:728)
- locked <3d4b3b50> (a java.net.DatagramPacket)
- locked <3d4b3b78> (a java.net.DatagramSocket)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$DatagramThread.run(DSUser.java:169)
"GarbageCollector" daemon prio=10 tid=08005740 nid=3828 lwp_id=947495 in Object.wait() [0x2dbda000..0x2dbda4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3d4b3b98> (a com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector)
at com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector.run(GarbageCollector.java:62)
- locked <3d4b3b98> (a com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector)
"ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=030424a8 nid=142 lwp_id=679935 in Object.wait() [0x2dc5c000..0x2dc5c4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b088> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b088> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=03042340 nid=141 lwp_id=679934 in Object.wait() [0x2dc9d000..0x2dc9d4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b108> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b108> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '12' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=030421d8 nid=140 lwp_id=679933 in Object.wait() [0x2dcde000..0x2dcde4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b188> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b188> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=03042070 nid=139 lwp_id=679932 in Object.wait() [0x2dd1f000..0x2dd1f4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b208> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b208> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '10' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=03041f08 nid=138 lwp_id=679931 in Object.wait() [0x2dd60000..0x2dd604f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b288> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b288> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '9' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=03041da0 nid=137 lwp_id=679930 in Object.wait() [0x2dda1000..0x2dda14f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b308> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b308> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '8' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=03041c38 nid=136 lwp_id=679929 in Object.wait() [0x2dde2000..0x2dde24f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b388> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b388> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '7' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=03041ad0 nid=135 lwp_id=679928 in Object.wait() [0x2de23000..0x2de234f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b408> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b408> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=03041968 nid=134 lwp_id=679927 in Object.wait() [0x2de64000..0x2de644f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b488> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b488> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '5' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=03041800 nid=133 lwp_id=679926 in Object.wait() [0x2dea5000..0x2dea54f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b508> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b508> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=03041698 nid=132 lwp_id=679925 in Object.wait() [0x2dee6000..0x2dee64f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b588> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b588> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=03041530 nid=131 lwp_id=679924 in Object.wait() [0x2df27000..0x2df274f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b608> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b608> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=030413c8 nid=130 lwp_id=679923 in Object.wait() [0x2df68000..0x2df684f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b688> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b688> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=03041260 nid=129 lwp_id=679922 in Object.wait() [0x2dfa9000..0x2dfa94f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b708> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b708> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'JmsDispatcher'" daemon prio=10 tid=030410f8 nid=128 lwp_id=679921 in Object.wait() [0x2dfea000..0x2dfea4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b7a8> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3b81b7a8> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ListenThread.Default" prio=10 tid=02953558 nid=127 lwp_id=679919 runnable [0x2e02b000..0x2e02b4f0]
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:353)
- locked <3b81b8c0> (a java.net.PlainSocketImpl)
at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:454)
at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:425)
at weblogic.socket.WeblogicServerSocket.accept(WeblogicServerSocket.java:26)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.ListenThread.accept(ListenThread.java:735)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.ListenThread.run(ListenThread.java:301)
"Adapter Suspend/Resume Task Handler" daemon prio=10 tid=029533f0 nid=126 lwp_id=679918 in Object.wait() [0x2e06c000..0x2e06c4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81b9a0> (a java.lang.String)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at com.bea.wlai.TaskHandler.run(TaskHandler.java:60)
- locked <3b81b9a0> (a java.lang.String)
"Adapter instance Auto-resume TaskHandler" daemon prio=10 tid=02953288 nid=125 lwp_id=679917 in Object.wait() [0x2e0ad000..0x2e0ad4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b81ba18> (a java.lang.String)
at com.bea.wlai.TaskHandler.run(TaskHandler.java:55)
- locked <3b81ba18> (a java.lang.String)
"ApplicationView Auto-resume TaskHandler" daemon prio=10 tid=000b6360 nid=124 lwp_id=679915 in Object.wait() [0x2e0ee000..0x2e0ee4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b74b988> (a java.lang.String)
at com.bea.wlai.TaskHandler.run(TaskHandler.java:55)
- locked <3b74b988> (a java.lang.String)
"ApplicationView Deployment TaskHandler" daemon prio=10 tid=000b61f8 nid=123 lwp_id=679914 in Object.wait() [0x2e12f000..0x2e12f4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b74b648> (a java.lang.String)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at com.bea.wlai.TaskHandler.run(TaskHandler.java:60)
- locked <3b74b648> (a java.lang.String)
"AreYouAlive" daemon prio=10 tid=000b6090 nid=122 lwp_id=679910 in Object.wait() [0x2e170000..0x2e1704f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1001)
- locked <8e395cc8> (a java.lang.Thread)
at java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1054)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.login(DSUser.java:752)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.reconnect(DSUser.java:544)
- locked <3b6e4558> (a com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser.invoke(DSUser.java:513)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$AreYouAlive.fire(DSUser.java:95)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$AreYouAlive.run(DSUser.java:117)
"DatagramThread" daemon prio=10 tid=000b5f28 nid=121 lwp_id=679909 runnable [0x2e1b1000..0x2e1b14f0]
at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive(Native Method)
- waiting to lock <3b6e6a18> (a java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
at java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:728)
- locked <3b6e9020> (a java.net.DatagramPacket)
- locked <3b6e69f0> (a java.net.DatagramSocket)
at com.inprise.vbroker.ds.DSUser$DatagramThread.run(DSUser.java:169)
"GarbageCollector" daemon prio=10 tid=000b5dc0 nid=120 lwp_id=679908 in Object.wait() [0x2e1f2000..0x2e1f24f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3b6e3338> (a com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector)
at com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector.run(GarbageCollector.java:62)
- locked <3b6e3338> (a com.inprise.vbroker.orb.GarbageCollector)
"Timer" daemon prio=10 tid=000b5af0 nid=119 lwp_id=679906 in Object.wait() [0x2e233000..0x2e2334f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at weblogic.time.common.internal.TimeTable.snooze(TimeTable.java:272)
- locked <3b65ee40> (a weblogic.time.common.internal.TimeTable)
at weblogic.management.timer.Timer.run(Timer.java:495)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
"Timer" daemon prio=10 tid=000b5c58 nid=118 lwp_id=679905 in Object.wait() [0x2e274000..0x2e2744f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at weblogic.time.common.internal.TimeTable.snooze(TimeTable.java:272)
- locked <3b642528> (a weblogic.time.common.internal.TimeTable)
at weblogic.management.timer.Timer.run(Timer.java:495)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
"Timer" daemon prio=10 tid=000b5820 nid=117 lwp_id=679904 in Object.wait() [0x2e2b5000..0x2e2b54f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at weblogic.time.common.internal.TimeTable.snooze(TimeTable.java:272)
- locked <3b639540> (a weblogic.time.common.internal.TimeTable)
at weblogic.management.timer.Timer.run(Timer.java:495)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
"ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Non-Blocking'" daemon prio=10 tid=077ca578 nid=116 lwp_id=679896 in Object.wait() [0x2e2f6000..0x2e2f64f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3ad75800> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Non-Blocking'" daemon prio=10 tid=077ca410 nid=115 lwp_id=679895 in Object.wait() [0x2e337000..0x2e3374f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3ad75328> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3ad75328> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Non-Blocking'" daemon prio=10 tid=077ca2a8 nid=114 lwp_id=679894 in Object.wait() [0x2e378000..0x2e3784f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3ad74e30> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3ad74e30> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'JMSStore<cgJMSStore_auto_1>.ioThreadPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=000b5988 nid=113 lwp_id=679892 in Object.wait() [0x2e3b9000..0x2e3b94f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <3af7c258> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"Thread-20" prio=10 tid=000b56b8 nid=112 lwp_id=679851 in Object.wait() [0x2e3fa000..0x2e3fa4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3a9b0250> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <3a9b0250> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Thread-19" prio=10 tid=000b5550 nid=111 lwp_id=679850 in Object.wait() [0x2e43b000..0x2e43b4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3a9b02f0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <3a9b02f0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Thread-18" daemon prio=10 tid=01a09c78 nid=110 lwp_id=679822 in Object.wait() [0x2e47c000..0x2e47c4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <39f1b930> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <39f1b930> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=03040f90 nid=109 lwp_id=679809 in Object.wait() [0x2e4bd000..0x2e4bd4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e53ac0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '10' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=03040e28 nid=108 lwp_id=679808 in Object.wait() [0x2e4fe000..0x2e4fe4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e535a8> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '9' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=03040cc0 nid=107 lwp_id=679807 in Object.wait() [0x2e53f000..0x2e53f4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e53090> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '8' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=03040b58 nid=106 lwp_id=679806 in Object.wait() [0x2e580000..0x2e5804f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e52b28> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '7' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=030409f0 nid=105 lwp_id=679805 in Object.wait() [0x2e5c1000..0x2e5c14f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e52610> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '6' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=03040888 nid=104 lwp_id=679804 in Object.wait() [0x2e602000..0x2e6024f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e520f8> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '5' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=03040720 nid=103 lwp_id=679803 in Object.wait() [0x2e643000..0x2e6434f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e51be0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=030405b8 nid=102 lwp_id=679802 in Object.wait() [0x2e684000..0x2e6844f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e516c8> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=03040450 nid=101 lwp_id=679801 in Object.wait() [0x2e6c5000..0x2e6c54f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <39e511b0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e511b0> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=030402e8 nid=100 lwp_id=679800 in Object.wait() [0x2e706000..0x2e7064f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <39e50c98> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e50c98> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=03040180 nid=99 lwp_id=679799 in Object.wait() [0x2e747000..0x2e7474f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <39e50780> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e50780> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'JMS.TimerClientPool'" daemon prio=10 tid=03040018 nid=98 lwp_id=679798 in Object.wait() [0x2e788000..0x2e7884f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <39e50268> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.waitForRequest(ExecuteThread.java:153)
- locked <39e50268> (a weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
"SeedGenerator Thread" daemon prio=10 tid=000b53e8 nid=97 lwp_id=679782 in Object.wait() [0x2e7c9000..0x2e7c94f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <39db8938> (a sun.security.provider.SeedGenerator$ThreadedSeedGenerator)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at sun.security.provider.SeedGenerator$ThreadedSeedGenerator.run(SeedGenerator.java:334)
- locked <39db8938> (a sun.security.provider.SeedGenerator$ThreadedSeedGenerator)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
"Noisy Thread" daemon prio=10 tid=000b5280 nid=96 lwp_id=679781 in Object.wait() [0x2e80a000..0x2e80a4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <39db89a0> (a sun.security.provider.SeedGenerator$ThreadedSeedGenerator$BogusThread)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429)
at sun.security.provider.SeedGenerator$ThreadedSeedGenerator$BogusThread.run(SeedGenerator.java:452)
- locked <39db89a0> (a sun.security.provider.SeedGenerator$ThreadedSeedGenerator$BogusThread)
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'JMS.TimerTreePool'" daemon prio=10 tid=000b5118 nid=95 lwp_id=679741 in Object.wait() [0x2e84b000..0x2e84b4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <395c5970> (a weblogic.jms.backend.BETimerTree)
at weblogic.jms.backend.BETimerTree.execute(BETimerTree.java:146)
- locked <395c5970> (a weblogic.jms.backend.BETimerTree)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:219)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
"Thread-17" prio=10 tid=000b4fb0 nid=94 lwp_id=679731 in Object.wait() [0x2e88c000..0x2e88c4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3971e8a0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <3971e8a0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Thread-16" prio=10 tid=000b4e48 nid=93 lwp_id=679728 in Object.wait() [0x2e8cd000..0x2e8cd4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3971e940> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <3971e940> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Thread-15" prio=10 tid=000b4ce0 nid=92 lwp_id=679727 in Object.wait() [0x2e90e000..0x2e90e4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3971e9e0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <3971e9e0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Thread-14" prio=10 tid=000b4b78 nid=91 lwp_id=679726 in Object.wait() [0x2e94f000..0x2e94f4f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3971ea80> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <3971ea80> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Thread-13" prio=10 tid=000b4a10 nid=90 lwp_id=679724 in Object.wait() [0x2e990000..0x2e9904f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3971eb20> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <3971eb20> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Thread-12" prio=10 tid=000b48a8 nid=89 lwp_id=679720 in Object.wait() [0x2e9d1000..0x2e9d14f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3971ebc0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <3971ebc0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Thread-11" prio=10 tid=000b4740 nid=88 lwp_id=679719 in Object.wait() [0x2ea12000..0x2ea124f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3971ec60> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <3971ec60> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Thread-10" prio=10 tid=000b45d8 nid=87 lwp_id=679718 in Object.wait() [0x2ea53000..0x2ea534f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3971ed00> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <3971ed00> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Thread-9" prio=10 tid=000b4470 nid=86 lwp_id=679717 in Object.wait() [0x2ea94000..0x2ea944f0]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <3971eda0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:429)
- locked <3971eda0> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
"Thread-8" prio=10 tid=000b4308 nid=85 lwp_id=679715 i -
I saw in a previous post that it was recommended to use a try/catch block when a timeout is expected to occur. I have 2 issues with that approach:
1) Does now allow accurate timing of how long a certain step takes.
2) If there's a dependency that that step should occur prior to the next step, I have had to arbitrarily add waits.
Are there any other approachs that can be used? Is there settings that can be changed for Siebel Functional and/or Siebel Load testing to allow for slower and/or inconsistent response times? Thanks.
-JohnAlex, thanks for your quick reply. That setting does not appear to have an impact. It is failing after 30 seconds and this was set to 120s. I changed it to 3600 and still got the following error:
GotoView pageTabs("SiebPageTabs") Account Explorer View
30.047
Failed
Failed to execute 'GotoView pageTabs("SiebPageTabs") Account Explorer View' on object: /siebelft:cas[@ClassName='SiebApplication' and @RepositoryName='Siebel Automotive']/siebelft:cas[@ClassName='SiebPageTabs' and @RepositoryName='SiebPageTabs']. Caused by: NullPointerException occured. Data Used: View, Account Explorer View <Less>
It's basically doing navigation but taking to long on the GotoView. Seems all commands fail if they take longer than 30s. I feel like this should be a setting somewhere. The command eventually finishes, but the script has already broken by that time. I don't want to have to add try/catch block to catch the exception and then a think time to avoid errors since some logic may depend on the successful execution/navigation.
Another reason to avoid using the try/catch approach is it seems that the script fails to run through iterations. I'm assuming at this point it's because of the failures it's receiving.
Thanks.
-John
Edited by: user11992738 on Mar 5, 2010 12:35 PM -
Has smart brush sizing made it into Photoshop CS5
With the introduction of CS4, the version of ACR changed the size of the adjustment brushes as you zoomed in and out of an image. Thus if I want to paint a fine area I could zoom to 400% but the brush would not be a huge circle, it would be proportionally smaller. Inconsistently, this behaviour was not carried into CS4. Does anyone know if it has now been implemented in CS5? It was such a great enhancement as I always have to reduce my brush size when I zoom in. Many thanks, Ian
Dear Chris,
That is interesting, but I wonder why the same logic does not apply to Adobe Camera Raw, where smart brush sizing works, and works astoundingly well. They must have considered the use case where someone is looking at a very high level of magnification and correctly assumed that they did not want a 4inch house painting brush. I figured that they just did not have time to include it in the CS4 release and was sure it would appear in CS5. Being a Wacom Cintiq user, it would have been so good to be able to zoom in and out using the slider on the left of the screen and have the brush alwasy be a sensible size when I arrived at the magnification.
Thank you for your reply,
Ian -
Hi Team,
We are getting inconsistant system behaviour while executing
transaction code - CFE02 while exporting same object at multiple times.
For example:
BOM - 1973005 transported successfully to cFolder by using Tcode- CFE02.
When I again exported this same object to other cFolder collaboration
that time, We are getting the message " You dont have write
authorization for BOM -1973005".
This system behaviour is inconsistant and we do not know when we will
get this error and when the object will get transported successfully.
What could be the possible reason for this inconsistant behaviour?
In Addition to the above information, Please refer the below infomation.
I am having the Write and create authorization at the folder level
where I am posting the data object and also I am having all the
required authorization in SAP R3 system.
Whne I am getting the above error, inspite of getting the error the BOM
gets exported to cFolder but the Version 1 becomes active and Version 2
becomes inactive.
In nomral scenario when we do not get the error that time BOM exported
with 2 Version where Version 2 is the active and Versio 1 is inactive.
ThanksClosed
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hello Experts, Scenario: we plan finished goods in SNP & for component level we run MRP in ECC. I need to understand how MRP does planning in ECC based on SNP Planned order. Why MRP run does detailed scheduling on Finished goods planned order which r
-
Hello everyone, I have place three different height images into a frame and applied scroll bar using Content viewer. I am calling each image through a button. My question is: Can we control the scroll bar height limiation as per the image's height. R
-
Cisco Aironet Remove Local MAC Address List (all)
Hi All, I need to remove all MAC addresses in the LOCAL MAC Address List on a Cisco Aironet. I do not want to remove running config on the device as we have changed over to a RADIUS Server. Can anyone give me some advice please?
-
VBN1 Multiple bundling alternative solution
Good afternoon sir/ma'am May I know what's the alternative solution or development to solve this problem of the standard 1:1 relationship
-
Macbook air 11 won't accept login password
Have not changed anything and all of a sudden today when I put in my password the login screen won't do anything. When this happened the computer had been "asleep" and I thought it was just getting stuck trying to wake up. After a few failed tries I