Incorrect posting with internal reconciliation

Hello
I have the next scenario
I have a supplier with multicurrency.
I make a payment in a currency different than the local and then i register an invoice also in a different currency. There is a diferent exchange rate between the payment and the invoice.
If i make an internal reconciliation, the system only does it in the local currency. So i dont get the post for the loos or gain in the exchange rate.
If i try to link the payment with the invoice in the outgoing payment i need to make a payment, and it cannot be 0.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Jacobo

Hello,
When the Payment is made based on the Invoice, the Exchange rate is booked in the Journal Entry created for that payment entry (if the exchange rate is different). Even in case of partial payment the same happens.
However,
Internal reconciliation with Multicurrency BP accounts are in LC only and as a result any exchange rate difference on reconciliation can only be posted by the user manually posting a journal for the difference.
This is facilitated through the internal reconciliation screen where the user can create a journal to e.g. credit the BP account and debit the exchange rate loss account - using the Adjustment button at the bottom of the screen.
E.g. if the MC BP has the following transactions waiting for
internal reconciliation:
Invoice  FC:  100   LC:  3300
Payment  FC: (100)  LC: (3500)
In this case if the difference, of 200, is identified as being an
exchange rate difference then the user should select both of these transactions for internal reconciliation in the manual internal reconciliation screen and then select the adjustments button to create a journal entry - when entering this journal entry the first line will automatically be populated with the reconciliation difference - in this case of 200 and the user should then create the second line of this journal entry to post the credit of 200 to the exchange rate difference gain account.
After posting this journal entry the following 3 lines will then be
selected for reconciliation:
1. Invoice   FC:  100   LC:  3300
2. Payment   FC: (100)  LC: (3500)
3. JE x-diff FC:    0   LC:   200
As this reconciliation balance is now zero these three lines can now be reconciled.
Hope it helps.
Kind Regards,
Jitin Chawla

Similar Messages

  • Recurring posting with Internal Order

    Dear Team,
    I want to create a service purchase order for 1 year and down payment is made for entire amount. How can i monthly book the expenses automatically. I need to post a service entry sheet and invoice automatically for every month. is it possible through internal order.
    Regards
    Rajesh Kumar

    Thanks but it will help in automatic posting of service entry,invoice every month.
    regards
    rajesh

  • Exchange rate in internal reconciliation

    Hello Rui
    I am still unable to do it.
    The scenario is the next.
    1.- Create a BP with multicurrency
    2.- Create a payment to BP in a foreign currency with an exchange rate
    3.- Create an invoice in foreign currency for the same amount as payment in foreign currency, but with a diferent exchange rate.
    4.- Try to make the internal reconciliation, and you dont get any post for gain or lose in te exchange rate. In the internal reconciliation window i cannot change the currency.
    If you try to link the invoice with the paymente, in the received payment option, you are unable to do it because you have to make a payment greater than zero.
    Also if i try to make a journal post for the difference iam unable because i get an error because i am using defferred tax.
    Any ideas??
    Thanks
    Jessica

    Hi Jessica,
    The previous thread Incorrect posting with internal reconciliation has the same post as this.
    If it is post by you in other people's name, it made everybody confusing.
    Please stay in the same user until question is closed.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Internal reconciliation

    Hello
    I have the next scenario
    Incorrect posting with internal reconciliation
    I think the system should be able to:
    1.- Make internal reconciliation for multicurrency BP, not just in local currency.
    2.- Reconcile Journal entry, with payment and invoices with deffered tax.
    3.- Let you make payments with zero, so you can link payment with invoices.
    I hope you can take this on account, because its a real problem for multicurrency BP in countries like mexico.
    Thanks
    Jacobo

    Sari,
    Please post your Question to the SDK Forum for a quick response.  This Forum is focussed on Implementation related questions.
    Good luck
    Suda

  • Posting of Perks with internal order

    Hello
    We have maintained cost distribution infotype with subtype 01 for all employees. The regular salary as well as perks are posted using this distribution. Now we have a requirement to post mobile expenses with internal order. In FI Side profit centre is maintained in internal order master, one to one relationship. In IT 27 multiple cost centres are maintained, each cost centre is having separate profit centres, So when we are trying to maintain the internal order in It 27, system is restricting us.
    If we maintain another record in It 27 with custom subtype with internal order and one cost centre which is being maintained in internal order master.How to link one particular wagetype with custom subtype of IT27, so that it will get posted with internal order.
    Thanks
    Swapna

    Thank you.
    Customizing in ACSET  was missing.
    It is working fine now

  • Posting a CO document with internal order

    Hi,
    Can anybody let me know the procedure of posting a CO document with internal order?
    Regards,
    Prasad

    Hello Naga,
    The CO document will be created automaticallywhen you posta document in FICO with a cost object assignment. By cost object assignment I mean u put the internal order number in oreder field of GL line item. The GL will be a primary cost element in kost cases of expense type.
    Hope I had been able to help you. please assign points.My points had been pending with you for last query resolution also.
    Rgds
    Manish

  • Can not post FI document with internal Order

    Hi all,
    I work with SAP version ECC 6.0. When I post a FI document with internal order, I have a problem":
    "FI: Postings" is not allowed (ORD 400000)
    Message no. BS007
    Diagnosis
    The current status of object 'ORD 400000' prohibits business transaction 'FI: Postings'.
    Procedure
    To process business transaction 'FI: Postings', you first have to change the status of object 'ORD 400000' to allow the transaction 'FI: Postings'.
    This gives you an overview of the system and user statuses that affect the transaction. A transaction can only be executed if there is at least one status that allows it and there is no status that forbids it.
    Pls help me a.s.a.p. Thanks

    Hi,
    Go to t.code: KO02 and enter the internal order no and click on control data screen, here u required to change the status from CRTD to Release(by click on release button) and save the data, then u can able to post the transaction.
    Some times internal orders has been created but not released , if it is not released, system won't allow you to post any transaction by using this internal order.  If this internal order has been released, then u r able to post the document by using this internal order.
    all the best
    Prasad

  • Parent Child Internal Reconciliation

    We have a scenario in SAP 2005 SP1 Patch 44 here:
    BP Customer Code (Child) - ZChild
    BP Customer Code (Child) - ZParent
    Step 1:  Invoices processed against ZChild
    Step 2:  Our client attached ZParent as Consolidated BP to ZChild after invoices have been proceesed.
    Note:  ZChild trade debtors account is AUD
    AParent trade debtors account is Multicurrency.
    Step 3: When Incoming Payment is processed, a message 'A consolidated BP is defined. It is recommended to post an incoming payment for this BP. BP Summary code: ZParent'.
    Step 4: When user put in ZParent, there was no invoices for payment.  So, incoming payment was processed to ZChild.
    Step 5: When we go to Bank Reconciliation--> Automatic Reconciliation for Internal Reconciliation, under ZChild, we only see the invoice. Under ZParent, we see nothing, so we cannot reconcile.
    Step 6: When we go to BP Master screen, balances and then drill down, the transactions are displayed as unreconciled.
    The problem here is:
    1. We cannot reverse the Incoming payment because SAP will give an error message Incorrect general ledger code.
    2.  We cannot reconcile as explained above.
    SAP should restrict users from attaching Consolidated BP code if the Child has open transactions.

    Hello,
    I tested on SBO 2005A SP01 PL45 with new business partner. If the child BP has open invoices and afterwards we add parent BP. The system does not allow to create payments. I get error message: The consolidating BP behind one or more of the selected invoices is different from the current consolidating BP [Message 3524-72].
    It seems some of the payments for parent BP were also added in previous patches.
    Please log a message with SAP support for the issue.
    Regards,
    Preety

  • Internal Reconciliation rules for the Business Partner

    Version: (Please provide the current version)
    SBO 2005-A PL11
    Description of requirements: (Please provide a detailed description)
    Employees are considered as Supplier for us
    We have defined two control account
    One to follow the Employee Advance payment : 15130020 
    the other to follow the Employee Expense voucher : 37100010
    Step 1 :
    We create one Down Payment Request for the Employee
    Step 2 :
    We paid the Down Payment Request (amount : 2000) using the Outgoing Payment :
    Posting Scheme generated :
    (C) 11100241 Petty Cash Account
    (D) 15130020 Employee Control Account for Down Payment
    Step 3 :
    We enter the Expense Voucher for this employee (Amount : 1200)
    Posting Scheme
    (D) 6XXXXXXX Profit & Loss GL Account
    (C) 37100010 Employee Control Account for Expenses
    Step 4 :
    Due to the fact that the amount of the advance is greater than the amount of the expense voucher, the employee have to reimburse the difference.
    We use the menu incoming payment
    The different steps follow up are :
         Select Vendor as type of BP for the incoming payment
         Select the invoice to be paid for the vendor, and tick the box "Payment on Advance" to take in account the amount already paid in the DPR
         Do the reimbursement of 800
    Posting Scheme :
    (C) 37100010 Employee Control Account for Expenses
    (D) 11100241 Petty Cash Account
    The problem is when we try to do the internal reconciliation we could not see in the same time for the Employee the 2 reconciliation accounts.
    How could we do ?
    Valid as of: (Date that this legal requirement is applicable)
    Business needs: (Please describe the impact on your business, if the functionality is not realized)
    We are not able to clear the advance done for the employee and the reimbursement done by the employee.
    Due to this fact, we retrieve if we have one other invoice to paid the DPR already paid and take in account in a previous reimbursement which generates damage in the system.
    Examples: (Please describe a typical example, how the functionality should work.)
    See upper
    Current Workaround: (Please describe the workarounds you are using at the moment)
    Use the same Control accounts for the Expense Voucher and the Advance payment
    Proposed solution: (Please suggest how the new functionality should work)
    Permit for the Internal reconciliation process for One Employee to retrieve the data link on the different control account regarding one employee / Supplier

    Hello,
    I was just wondering whether you have checked the case in 2007 A version in which brand new concept of internal reconciliation was delivered for customers.
    Please try to avoid so long postings. Create rather an attachment with longer description of the issue/case. This helps to increase transparency in the discussions.
    Peter Dominik
    SAP
    B1 Product Definition

  • Internal Reconciliation - Payment transactions applied to down payment req

    Our client has 2 transactions in their Suspense Account:
    1. Incoming Payment: Type = Other and have posted an amount to a G/L Suspense Account.
    2. General Journal: One side to the Expense (credit) and the other side to the Suspense Account (debit)[this was for a refund]
    When they go into the Suspense account to perform an internal reconciliation, the system errors with a message - "Payment transactions applied to down payment requests cannot be reconciled here"
    The problem is that they have not used a Down Payment Invoice at any stage of the transaction...
    They are on v2007A Patch 06

    Logged with SAP been waiting for 3 months and no reponse assume that this is a bug

  • ABUMN: Posting with trans.type 300 not possible (No acquisition posted)

    Hello everyone,
    I have seen a few threads on this topic, however I am still not finding a resolution to my issue.  I am very new to the FICO configuration scene and probably need a little more hand holding than the others who have asked this question.
    I am having and issue using ABUMN while transfering a Capital Investment Project (CIP Asset) under a asset class of AUC, to a standard fixed asset.  The CIP has been capitalized.  However, when I try to perform the transfer I am receiving the following error:
    Posting with trans.type 300 not possible (No acquisition posted)
    Message no. AA324
    Diagnosis
    Transaction type 300 belongs to a transaction type group, which can only be used to post to assets to which posting has already been performed. However, no postings have been made to this asset.
    Procedure
    Use a transaction type from a transaction type group, which can be used for the first acquisition to an asset.
    I have read through SAP NOTE 327088 (for retirements transfer variant 4) and it just doesn't help me with the issue.  I know it probably should, but I do not know enough about this process in order for it to make a whole lot of sense.
    If anyone can help me with this, it would be greatly appreciated.  Again, I am very new, so I will probably have several follow-up questions as well.
    Thanks in advance for the help!
    Rhonda

    Okay...
    I have finally figured this out on my own.
    When trying to transfer a capital investment project asset with an AuC class (asset under construction), ABUMN is not to be used.
    1st.  The internal order needs to be fully settled (KO02).  Create a settlement rule "FUL" for the designated fixed asset.
    2nd.  Run "Actual Settlement" run via KO88.
    This should transfer everything from the CIP asset to the fixed asset.  You can double check this via the S_ALR_87011967 - ... by Plant report.  Run this report prior to performing the steps above and the money will show in the CIP asset account, run it again after the above steps.  The CIP should be zeroed out and the fixed asset should now carry the amount.

  • Freegoods issue with internal order CO

    Dear Experts,
    I am facing a Problem with free goods issue,
    When I am doing sales order VA01 I am entering internal order number, once I complete the process flow it is crediting stock account (24240000) and debiting the COGS FG (50014000) account.
    When I am doing sales order VA01 without internal order once I complete the process flow it is crediting Stock account (24240000)  and Debiting the Free goods expenses account(60014010) (as per business process it is correct)
    With internal order also it should post to free goods expenses account.
    Kindly help me on this I am not able to trace.

    Hi
    Please check item category TANN settings.Also check in VTLA copy control  there is a feild "Update Cost", tick the feild.
    Please go through the links which may help you
    PGI accounting
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Can't get sound to play back on Movie Maker when recording with internal webcam/microphone

    I have a Windows 8, 64-bit  Envy notebook.   I tried using Google Hangouts but there wasn't any sound (the camera was fine).   
    Later, I decided to test the  internal microphone myself by  creating a Movie Maker file,  and clicking on Webcam and making a recording.  The camera worked but it played back in total silence. 
    I checked the settings for the microphone and the internal mic was properly set as the default.  I turned up the volume to the maximum.   Then I found directions for doing a sound check, and I was able to do the Sound Recording check and get audio when I played the file back.   
    But when I tried again to make a video,  i got zero in the playback. 
    Any idea what's going wrong? 
    Thanks,
    Pat

    Hello Myerspat,
    Welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience! 
    I have read your post on how you are not able to get sound from your notebook computer, and I would be happy to assist you in this matter!
    To restore the audio to your notebook, I recommend following this document on No Sound from Speakers (Windows 8). This should help with the playback on your system.
    In addition, you can also follow @SuperMario1's thread on Troubleshooting Guide: Audio does not Work after a Certain Period of Time. This guide should help with your notebook's audio output in regards to a recent Windows Update.
    For more assistance, I will need to know:
    The Product and Model Number of your notebook computer.
    If your computer has completed all of its important Windows Updates.
    If you have updated your HP drivers using the HP Support Assistant.
    If this is an on-going, or recent issue.
    Please re-post with the results of your troubleshooting, as well as the requested information above. I look forward to your reply!
    Regards   
    MechPilot
    I work on behalf of HP
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!

  • I am getting problem with internal table & work area declaration.

    I am working with 'makt' table ..with the table makt i need to work with styles attributes ..so i declared like this
    TYPES : BEGIN OF ty_makt,
             matnr TYPE makt-matnr,
             spras TYPE makt-spras,
             maktx TYPE makt-maktx,
             maktg TYPE makt-maktg,
             celltab TYPE lvc_t_styl,
           END OF ty_makt.
    DATA : i_makt TYPE TABLE OF ty_makt.
    DATA : wa_makt TYPE ty_makt .
        But end of program i need to update dbtable "makt"...i am getting problem with internal table & work area declaration.
    i think makt table fields mapping and internal table/work area mapping is not correct. so please help me to get out from this.

    Hi Nagasankar,
    TYPES : BEGIN OF TY_MATNR,
                  MATNR TYPE MAKT-MATNR,
                  SPRAS TYPE MAKT-SPRAS,
                  MAKTX TYPE MAKT-MAKTX,
                  MAKTX TYPE MAKT-MAKTG,
                  CELLTAB TYPE LVC_T_STYL,  " Its Working perfectly fine..
                 END OF TY_MAKT.
    DATA: IT_MAKT TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_MAKT,
              WA_MAKT TYPE TY_MAKT.
    Its working perfectly fine. if still you are facing any issue post your complete code.
    Thanks,
    Sandeep

  • Fields suppressed when posting with FB01 and special gl-indicator

    Hello everybody,
    I have the following problem:
    I'm trying to make a vendor open item posting with transaction code 'FB01' and a special G/L-Indicator. Although the field status group of posting key and target reconciliation account is set all to optional, some fields which should be populated are suppressed, such as ZLSPR or ZBD3T.
    Does anybody know what the reason for this is?
    Thank you in advance!
    Regards,
    B

    Hello,
    If the posting keys and reconciliation account's field status variants are maintained correctly, then you should also check if you are using any screen / transaction variants
    I am completely not sure about this, but you can check this. I hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Suresh Jayanthi.

Maybe you are looking for