Multiple Receiver Interface in integrated config(AAE)

Hello Experts,
We have a SOAP to RFC synchronous interface.There is a requirement where we have a Single Sender interface(Single Sender System) and based on the value in Payload we have to select either of two different Receiver RFC interface(Single receiver System). I am not sure whether we can select either of two different RFC interface for the same Receiver system in an Integrated Configuration(AAE).
Appreciate your help!!!
Thanks.

Hi,
Alternatively, you can opt to use multi-mapping, with the occurrences of each message set to 0..1. The interface is triggered via conditions. In ID, you would be declaring an Enhanced Interface Determination.
Hope this helps,

Similar Messages

Conditional base routing to multiple receiver's for syncronous interface

Hi All,
I have a requirement of sysnchronous interface where i need to send the message to 2 diffrent systems based on the routing condition. Based on routing condition we will determine the receiver to send message and response shloud send back to sender.
Please let me know my requirement is possible using sysnchromous call i.e sending to multiple receiver's based on conditon. Thanks.
Regards,
KK
Message was edited by:
kalpana k

Aamir,
I dont think BPM is required here,XI always use mesasgeID as the reference.
lets say you sent a request then XI generates message ID :11111 (for Ex)
and for the response XI again generate another message ID:22222(for Ex),but referencing to MessageID:11111,it cant be to some other request message ID.(always reference is maintained by XI for Sync calls)
so we dont need to maintain any relationship between request and respone ,explicitly.it is being taken care by XI itself for sync calls.
response1 for a request1 wont go to someothers request2.
I dont know whether you get my point what I was trying to say.
and just using Xpaths in receiver determination would give the solution.but need to have two Receiver agreements.
I might be wrong !
thank you,
regards,
Babu Sri

Any possiblity to use single Inbound Service Interface with multiple Receiver Agreements

Hi All,
Scenario: PROXY to FILE.
Requirement is to receive to two locations.
Is it possible to use single Inbound interface with multiple Receiver Agreements. I tried using two operation in the Inbound Service Interface, and Operation Specific in Determination. But couldnt proceed further. Do I need to use seperate Service Interface for two receiver locations?
Please suggest some solution.

Hi Naveen,
There is a possibility but in the case in the same server location with dynamic configuration: Placing file in two different directories using single receiver communication Channel
With different location you would need to develop a new adapter module as Amit Srivastava explains and develops here Send File to Two Different Locations using Adapter Module
Regards.

Integrated Configuration - AAE - Monitoring

Hello All
I am trying to understand how Integrated Configuration works in the runtime and things look rather neat to me with my scenario working.
But monitoring this in the RWB, few questions cropped up, which I hope someone can help answer:
1. Inbound and Outbound Payload Monitoring
When message get processed within the Integration Engine, we can see the input payload and also the output of the mapping. In the case of the Integrated Configuration, is this not possible? I don't see any new special window open and hence how is the monitoring of the various steps specifically input and output done?
2. Mapping Trace not accessible
To further analyze what is new, we put a few standard XI trace steps into the mapping to see where these traces are displayed in the runtime. We thought it would be a part of the Audit Log, but it is not. Has anyone experience with how trace (custom mapping trace using the AbstractTrace object ) can be used with Integrated Configuration or is that another limitation with PI 7.1 and the Integrated Configuration?
To me these two are major requirements as a application developer to do my development and support and hence am wondering whether to gain performance have these options been eliminated or is there some set up needed on the server which we have missed.
Thoughts , ideas welcome.
Regards
Bhavesh
PS : You know what my questions to the Subject Matter Experts at the Bangalore teched are going to be

Hello Rodrigo,
Regarding monitoring of different versions of the message processed by means of AAE, this is unfortunately not possible in PI 7.1x - message is persisted only once in such scenarios (after receiver/interface determination). Multiple persistence of the processed message in Java stack is only available in 7.3x - there you have options for configurable staging (property xiadapter.stage.conf of J2EE service XPI Adapter: XI) and logging (property xiadapter.logger.conf of J2EE service XPI Adapter: XI) of the message so that several versions of the message (e.g. before mapping and after mapping) can be observed (incl. these versions' payloads). Technically, it is possible to setup staging/logging for different processing steps (namely stages - analogue of pipeline services in classical Integration Engine processing) - but, as I said, in 7.3x and not in 7.1x.
Speaking about creation of custom audit log entries, did you check SAP standard AuditMessageKey and AuditAccess for this? (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi711/helpdata/en/3b/6fe540b1278631e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm)
Regards,
Vadim

IDOC - BPM - IDOC Error --no sender or receiver interface definition found

I have an integration scenario, IDOC - BPM - IDOC. SAP will send ACC_GL_POSTING IDOC to XI, a BPM will start and then the BPM will send an IDOC to another SAP system.
I have read instructions on weblogs:
/people/pooja.pandey/blog/2005/07/27/idocs-multiple-types-collection-in-bpm
/people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm
The scenario has been successfully tested in the Test Configuration Tool. However, when I try send IDOC from the source, I received the message below in the trace.
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_BPE-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Processing mode is</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">created BPE proxy for message B45CB0079DFA814BAD22CD1ED64CA6AB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="interface activity determination">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Version 000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message status 000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Interface action INIT</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">(must be INIT for a new determination)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">start CHECK_INTERFACE</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start sender interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface ACC_GL_POSTING.ACC_GL_POSTING01*</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">no interface found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start receiver interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Loop 0000000001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface ACC_GL_POSTING_abs*</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace http://summaryFinancial.sap.dominofoods.com</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">no interface found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--no sender or receiver interface definition found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hence set action to DEL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">end CHECK_INTERFACE</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Set interface action DEL into MAST</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-GETBLOBDATA" />
<Trace level="3" type="T">inserted message into pipeline PE_ADAPTER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-04-30T18:32:30Z EST qRFC raised on XBQO$PE_WS91000003</Trace>
</Trace>
Thanks,
Sergio

Rajeev,
The source system in the receiver determination is connected to R3. Other IDOCs are coming across the XI system.
Below is some trace information in the Receiver Determination.
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Start without given receiver</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Classic Receiver Determination via Rules.</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for rule line no. 1</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid Receiver w/o Condition: - IP_GeneralLedger</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">No Receiver found behaviour: 0</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of Receivers:1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) IP_GeneralLedger ACC_GL_POSTING_abs</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf without Condition: ACC_GL_POSTING_abs</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of receiving Interfaces:1</Trace>
Thanks,
Sergio

Condition Based Interface Determination in ICO (AAE) - PI 7.1 EHP1

Hi Friends,
We have PI 7.1 EHP1 - SP 04.
In our scenario, we have 1 outbound interface and 2 inbound interface. Based on condition, it needs to select the first inbound interface or second inbound interface.
In the normal configuration, we are able to select. (By click + icon and add condition in the Receiver Interfaces in Interface Determination Step)
When we create configuration using ICO (Integrated Configuration), there is no option in "Receiver Interfaces" Tab to add two inbound interfaces with condition.
Could you please clarify how do we do this in ICO?
Kind regards,
Jegathees P.

IMHO, condition based interface determination is not possible in ICO.
Use Multiple inbound service interfaces... You can handle in design level .. ESR level.
Check the Abhishek's blog... This might be helpful.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90dcc6f4-0829-2d10-b0b2-c892473f1571?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Note: Since in your case you need two receiver agreements, you cannot handle through ICO. The above link might be helpful to do multimapping without BPM.
Edited by: Baskar Gopal on Apr 26, 2011 9:53 AM

Multiple Queue Assignment for Integration Process - PI 7.11

Hi,
I am trying to configure multiple Queues for an Integration Process.
The Integration Process is straight forward, except for a Asynchronous Request Response pattern with correlation. (A asynch send step - immediately followed by a asynchronous receive step with Correlation)
I have done the following
1) In IR set the Queue as Multiple - Content Specific
2) In SWF_INB_CONF transaction reconfigured Multiple Queues - Content Specific without buffering
But when I trigger the message, the message is not at all triggering/entering the Integration Process. The error message is BPE Internal Failure.
But if I reconfigure the IP as One Configurable Queue & "Without Buffering", it is working. But we want multiple queues assigned to this Process.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sudharshan N A

Bjoern, there are blogs/wikis available which should be searched before a question is asked on forum. The information you need is quite basic one and I will therefore lock this thread.
Regards,
Prateek

Message Interface in Integration Directory

Hi,
In Integration Repository, I have one send step in BPM.
I am sending one Abstract Interface from BPM. While creating Receiver Determination in Integration Directory,
I am unable to find the message interface which is created in Integration Repository.
Please let me know, if you have any thoughts on this.
Thanks & Regards
Katta Mohan Reddy

Hi,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/weblogs.sdn?blog=/pub/wlg/1822. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
I think this is a good weblog to clear doubts with BPM. Hope it helps,
Cheers,
Divya

Problem in creating Receiver Agreement using Integration Directory API

Hello Experts,
We are developing a scenario where we are creating "REceiver Agreement" through Integration Directory API.
This requires certain parameters like Sender component, Interface, Communication Channel & Namespace to be set in the code.The required Communication Channel & Components already exist in Integration Directory .
Our concern is that we are not able to retreive this Communication Channel's ID through the code in order to set it as a parameter for Receiver Agreement generation.
Can anybody pls advice??
Thanks in advance,
Suraj.

Hi Stefan,
We tried using query on communication channel, but could not do it as we could not get a method which accepts name of communication channel as parameter.
We used "CommunicationChannelQueryIn" related methods in the API.
But still could not retreive the Communication Channel ID of an existing Communication Channel.
Please help.

How to handle multiple inbound interfaces with WSDL messages

Hi All,
We have a synchronous: Abap Proxy -> XI -> WebService Scenario. The webservice has multiple SoapActions e.g. SearchForProduct_WithX, SearchForProduct_WithY each with different message types. We have tried to use the receiver determination to send the request to the correct soapaction using conditions e.g. if field X in the request is populated use SearchForProduct_WithX action/message.
But when we run it through the proxy we get this error:
<CODE>IF_DETERMINATION.TOO_MANY_IIFS_CASE_BE</CODE>
<ERRORTEXT>Multiple inbound interfaces not supported for synchronous calls</ERRORTEXT>
Does anybody know how we can get around this or how best to deal with the multiple soap actions per wsdl situation.

Hi Yaghya,
We have used conditions in the Interface Determination. Interestingly if we use an HTTP sender adapter we can use this configuration ... but once we try and use ABAP proxies we get the previous error.
Another related question ... when we use the http adapter we get a connection time out exception. Same thing happens if we try and use the wsdl tester at /wsnavigator but we can open the wsdl through the browser. Any idea on this one?
Thanks for all your help.

Enhanced Receiver determination - for Integration Process

Hi,
Just wanted to confirm that if it is possible to have more than one Receivers, with Enhanced Receiver Determination and one of the Receiver happens to be Integration Process. I know with Enhanced Receiver Determinations you can find more than one Receivers at Run time, however the key question is, if in addition to normal Receiver Systems (like SAP R/3 or Web Services etc), if we can also kickoff Integration Process within Enhanced Receiver Determination.
Thanking in advance.

as said by Udo Martens
Assumedly the different receivers are using different Inbound Interfaces (a BP is using an Abstract Interface). Therefore you would need for each different receiver a own Interface Determination referring a own mapping.
refer this wiki http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/pointstab/viewpageversion.action?pageId=131760630&version=5 to Know how to configure Enhanced receiver determination and Interface determination for each receiver .
In your case one of the receiver will be Integration process

ACS 5.4 multiple network interfaces support

In ACS 5.4 release note, it says:
Multiple network interface connector support
ACS 5.4 supports up to four network interfaces: Ethernet 0, Ethernet 1, Ethernet 2, and Ethernet 3. ACS management functions use only the Ethernet 0 interface, but AAA protocols use all configured network interfaces. You must connect the ACS nodes in the distributed deployment only to the Ethernet 0 interface. Therefore, the syslog messages are sent and received at the log collector's Ethernet 0 interface. Data forwarding from one interface to another interface is prohibited to prevent potential security issues. The external identity stores are supported only on the Ethernet 0 interface. In ACS 5.4, multiple network interface connectors are also supported for proxies.
But in the CSACS 1121 Series Appliance Rear View section, it still says on Ethernet 0 is usable. All other interfaces are blocked.
I am confused. Can anyone clarify for me if we can use multiple network interface in ACS 5.4? What about management interface?
Thanks!

We configured 2 interfaces in past within testing enviornment and it worked. ACS 5.4 supports multiple network interfaces on the UCS platform, on a virtual machine and on the legacy ACS 5.x IBM/CAM hardware. The ACS management functions use the interface eth0 only and the AAA protocols use all available network interfaces.
Jatin Katyal
- Do rate helpful posts -

Integrtion Scenario using BPM with two sender and multiple receiver

integrtion Scenario using BPM with two sender and multiple receiver
How many Application Components are required?

Hi Vinod,
1) In integration repository you can have one or many software components it depends on your landscape orchestration
2) In integration direcory you need at least one service for bpm and one or many for each system in your bpm
also each connection between systems and bpm must have receiver determination and so on.
Advice: Please treat BPM as a separate system.
best,
Wojciech

Multiple Receiver Dtermination from Same Business Sender Service to RecvStp

Hi,
I was trying to implement FORK STEP in ccBPM. Scenario I'm trying to implement is, using fork bundle PO with same items together.
Can anybody help me to create multiple receiver dterminations for three receiver steps in three branches of fork step, where a common business sender service and same Integration process is used for receiving messages into SAP XI.
Please advice soon,
Thank You,

Hi Murali,
If it's always the same message, only one receiver determination is necessary. I'd also rather tend to do the capturing within a loop which is executed three times.
Best regards
Joachim

Can u breif me the meaining of interface in Integration Directory of XI

interface of Integration Directory and Java are same as i am new to XI and familiar with java, it would be helopful if i found the difference between interface between java interface and XI interface
Thanks & Regards,
Pushparaju.B.

Hi Pushpa raj,
It is very nice to see you here, Let me share my kowledge and it might help you to understand better.
1)wthat is meant by XI?
A) XI is nothing but Exchange Infrastructure.
2)What does it do?
A)It is middle ware tool like webmethods and tibco,XI is a middle tool ware tool provided by SAP.
   XI will gives an advantage to exchange the data between two systems.The System might be A2A or B2B.A2A is nothing but Application to Application and B2B is nothing but Business to Business.
EX:System A--XI--
>System B.
                        data                  data
See the abvoe example I have two system both these system might be sap to sap or sap to non sap applications.
I have a situation where want to send data from System A to System B..I need one middle ware tool such way that it will accept the system A data and undestand the data and it could get transfer to System B.
    Sucha situation we need middle ware tool like xi and for sending the system A data to System B though XI we need one interface where it can have both sender data and receiver data.
How a Interface looks,
System A contines two fileds and I want to send these data to System B
System A                                                       System B
First Name-Rama Rao                               FullName:--Rama RaoTatineni.
LastName----Tatineni
So the above information can be hold one interface and it will transfered to System B.
Hope you understand better...still if you have any question please feel free to ask so that I can help you out by clarifiying your doubts.
Note:Interface whichin java and interface which in XI is both are different.
Thanks in Advance.
Chandu.

Multiple Receiver Interface in integrated config(AAE)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for