Integration Model got cancelled

Hi,
We are running the deactivation or activation of integration model in Program.if any SYSFAIL(Example: SQL error) occur in E.C.C outbound queue suddenly the active integration model has got fail.please guide me on this.. Why this happend and solution for the above?
thanx,
C.Parthiban

Hi,
-Go to transaction /SAPAPO/CQ check the Q no.
-Go to SMQ2 or SMQ1  (depending on Direction flow)
-Check for SYSFAIL entries
-by Double clicking go in and try to analyse the Q error .
Before activation of any integration model normally you should make sure that CIF Qs are clear.
Regards
Samir

Similar Messages

  • Transfer of material from R/3 to APO, Problem in Integration model

    Hi
    I have created Integration model for Transferring material from R/3 to APO.
    While  activating the model, it is giving error  with status as i..e. SYSFAIL
    On clicking the status, I am getting the following message
    "Logical system R3CON does not assigned to Business System Group"
    ?Where to locate the BSG in  R/3 and assign before transferring  matl to APO
    i require the steps&help  to solve the problem.
    Thanks in advance to all members for the help.
    Srikanth

    Dear Srikant ,
    Pls check you have followed the below steps in the same sequence for R3 and APO
    <u>CIF Settings in R/3</u>
    Check ALE settings or activate ALE settings          
    •Define the logical system               <b>BD54</b>
    •Assign logical system to a client               <b>SCC4</b>
    Set the RFC destination               <b>SM59</b>
    <i>Assign target system and queue type          <b>CFC1</b></i>
    Maintain the SAP APO release               <b>NDV2</b>
    Activate BTEs for SAP APO integration          <b>BF11</b>
    User parameters for CIF               <b>CFC2</b>
    <u>CIF Settings in APO</u>
    Check ALE settings or activate ALE settings          
    • Define the logical system               <b>BD54</b>
    • Assign logical system to a client          <b>SCC4</b>
    Set the RFC destination                <b>SM59</b>
    Set up business system group     
    –Create BSG                <b>/SAPAPO/C1</b>
    –Assign logical systems to BSG          <b>/SAPAPO/C2</b>
    Maintain distribution definitions               <b>/SAPAPO/CP1</b>
    User parameters for CIF               <b>/SAPAPO/C4</b>
    You have got stuck up somewhere in R3 setting , which I have marked in italic font i.e.<i>Assign target system and queue type          CFC1</i>
    I hope this will solve your problem .
    Thanks ,
    Digambar

  • Manual Reservations Integration Model

    Hello All,
    In our project, during Go-live we dint had manual reservation Integration Model Activated due to some business reason. 
    whenver a process order is created in R/3, Reservations for Components appear in R/3 and APO.
    Now when the components are good Issued in R/3 during Finished Product Process Order, these dependent reservations are not deleted in APO though the stock is reduced. Upon analysis we found that by activating the Manual Reservation Integration Model , these reservation will be deleted and hence both the R/3 and APO System will be in sync.
    Now the Problem is when we are trying to do this manual reservation Integration Model activation through Batch Job , activation is taking a very long time. Upon further analysis we found that for the material-Plant combinations, program tries to search records in table RESB and approximately it takes around 5 minutes for each material -plant combinations. In our integration model we have around 2400 Material-Plant Combinations. CFC3 settings for Reservations are select block size of 1000 and filter block size of 512. R/3 version is 4.7.
    Table entries in RESB are close to 3.5 Million with 141 Extends.
    So just wanted to check with you guys if anybody has experienced this problem before and what resolutions were put in place to addres this ? Are there any SAP Notes available ? I searched but could not found any.
    also what would be the best way to go forward? Some of the options i could think are
    1) Run the I.M for selected material-Plant Combinations
    2) Run the I.M for generic selection Criteria ( i.e AS IS) during Weekend.
    Pls share your opinions.
    Regards,
    Pawan.

    Hello Kenneth,
    As i understand from your message that if a final Issue Indicator is unchecked, then those reservations should be present in APO. However i got confused with your below statement
    Therefore it is neccessary that reservations with final issue indicator set are available in APO.
    I think you might be trying to tell  reservations with final issue indicator unchecked ( and not SET) are available in APO.
    Regarding Transaction Code MBVR, I have few queries
    1) Does this T-CODE MBVR sets the deletion Indicator in Table RESB or does it delete the Reservation permanently from Table.
    2) I am not able to locate Completed Items field, which will enable me to delete Reservations. Can you pls let me know the field name.
    Pls note that whenever i am trying to delete reservations thorugh t-code MBVR, it gives a message " No Document exists for the Speficied data".
    thanks for your assistance,
    Pawan.

  • Staring integration model after activation throws an error

    Hello Experts,
    I am trying to import Sales Orders from SAP ERP to APO. The integration model is done and the master data like Products and Location are transfeered to APO.
    But when I try to transfer the Sales Orders I get an error saying:
    Outbound Queue Blocked.
    Function/Q/SAPAPO/CIF_ECM_INBOUND
    Text:        Processing of change number 500000000007 cancelled
    Then the dialog box gives the options to goto the: qRFC Monitor, Ignore or Cancel.
    The qRFC monitor records theame error.
    Kindly let me know how I can solve this and transfer theSales Orders to APO.
    Thanks,
    Dilip

    Dear Tibor,
    Thank you for you reply. I will check the authorizations.
    After this error I canceled it and went ahead. Then it gave me another error saying Product <> not found.
    After getting beyond this error too it gave me about 260 successful messages in the logs. But when I execute the BAPI BAPI_SLSRVAPS_GETLIST2 OR go to the table /SAPAPO/ORDKEY in APO I cant find any Orders.
    Can you kindly guide me as to where I am going wrong?
    Best Regards,
    Dilip

  • CIF Queues generated without active integration model

    Hello All,
    We are facing a unique issue, where queues are seen in SCM queue manager although those products are not there in any active integration model for transaction data.
    The scenario is as follows:
    1. We are CIFing only master data as we have only DP and release to R/3
    2. There is active integration model for master data
    3. There is no integration model for transaction data
    However in SCM queue manager, I am seeing queues of type CFFCC "Location" "Product".
    The function module name is /SAPAPO/CIF_IRQ_REDUCT_INBOUND.
    We observed in R/3 that the goods movement transaction code MB1A is trigerring TRFC's which is generating the queues.
    Has anyone encountered a similar scenario like this?
    Regards,
    Kedar

    Oi Jackeline!
    Hello, all!
    I think Vikas got the point, but let me be more specific...
    The transfer of requirement reduction depended in previous releases (until PI 2002.1) only on an integration model for material master data being active. Then a new type of integration models was created to control the sending of requirement
    reduction.
    To activate the new logic a flag has to be set in customizing.
    Use transaction /CFC9
    OR
    R/3 SAP Customizing Implementation Guide
    -> Integration with Other SAP Components
    -> Advanced Planning and Optimization
      -> Application-Specific Settings and Enhancements
       -> Settings and Enhancements for Requirement Reduction
        -> Evaluate the Requirements Reduction Filter Object Type:
    Then, flag 'Filter Object Requirements Reduction'
    If you set this flag no queue of type CFFCC* will be sent if there is no explicit active integration model for Requirements Reduction. Please set this flag in production and delete any existing queues of type CFFCC*. No new such queues should be created in the future as long as you don't activate the transfer via an integration model.
    I hope this information helps to clarify this issue.
    Please give your feedback concerning the given solution.
    Thank you!
    Will

  • Issue with CIF Integration model for Transaction data

    Hi Gurus,
    I have activated the Integration model for PO & PReqs by location wise and i assumed that transaction data is online and we need not to re activate for any new Product / location combination got created in system.
    But the issue is that every time a new material got created, we need to deactivate and activate the integration model for Transaction data to get the transaction data into APO.
    Is there any way to avoid the following exercise as it is taking very long time for activation.
    Please guide me as it is very urgent.
    Thanks for help in advance...
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jagadeesh

    I assume 1,60,000 location products are spread around different locations.
    Rather than one Integration Model it is better to have multiple Integration Models.
    For example: one for each region like North America, one for Europe, one for Asia (assuming you have countries spread across the world). Or create Intgeration Model by Country.
    This way you reduce the number of Products in an Integration Model.
    It is very important to have manageable set of Integration Models. Let me give an example - you have some problem hence the single Material Master Integration Model is down (inactive). At that time any PP or PDS transfer will not have the Header or COmponent products transferred to APO (in effect PDS/PPM cannot be transferred). If you are creating or converting Planned Orders they will not transfer to R/3 (as Header product is not part of active intgeration model).
    But if you have country spefic or region specific Integration Model - only that country is affected not all.
    In fact you should have other integration model (like PDS/PPM, Procurement Relationships, Planned / Production Orders, Sales Orders, Stocks) in same manner i.e. either Country(s) specific or group of countries by region. The risk of models getting inactive or taking too much time to activate after regeneration easily outweighs management of more number of Integration Models (compared to one Global integration model per object).
    Hope this gives you some direction.
    Somnath

  • Destination system cannot be used for classic qRFC by activating integration models

    Hi All,
    I am trying to connect ECC Release 702 to SAP TM 8.0 but by activating integration models(CFM2) i got following runtime error:
    Error analysis
        Short text of error message:
        Destination TMCLNT100 cannot be used for classic qRFC
        Long text of error message:
        Technical information about the message:
        Message class....... "SR"
        Number.............. 320
        Variable 1.......... "TMCLNT100"
        Variable 2.......... " "
        Variable 3.......... " "
        Variable 4.......... " "
    any one has idea how to solve that?
    Thanks a lot!
    Kind regards
    RW

    RW,
    I am definitely not an expert on SAP Transportation Management.  However, maybe your destination system has been set up as bgRFC instead of qRFC?
    bgRFC (Background Remote Function Call) - Connectivity - SAP Library
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Problem with activating integration model

    When I am trying to activate an integration model, that includes a scheduling agreement (type LF), the activation isn't successfull. It isn't blocked, but it never stops.
    In the screen I have a message called "determining delta model" but it never continous with executing the activation.
    Does anybody know what could cause this problem?
    thanks in advance
    Mark Smeets

    Hi,
    I am facing the same problem as mentioned in the original post.
    Whenever I activate the integration model for vendors, a "CIF_LOAD" window appears with message "Should interval be created" with YES and NO option. Why does this window appears. After clicking on NO option the message "Determining delta model" appears in the status bar and after some time the program gets terminated due to time out.
    I have tried following solutions mentioned in this thread.
    Refreshed the indexes of the two tables BDCPS and BDCP using DB20.
    Executed the transaction BD22 in test run mode, but I am not sure which change pointers option(obsolete or processed) to select for deletion and also which message type. I selected the obsolete option but here too the program got terminated after time out. Besides I am doing this on prduction environment and other integration models like plant etc got activated.
    Please help us with this.
    Regards,
    Gaurav Patil

  • Problem with activation of integration model

    Hi,
    I am facing a problem. Whenever I activate the integration model for vendors, a "CIF_LOAD" window appears with message "Should interval be created" with YES and NO option. Why does this window appears? After clicking on NO option the message "Determining delta model" appears in the status bar and after some time the program gets terminated due to time out.
    I have tried following solutions.
    Refreshed the indexes of the two tables BDCPS and BDCP using DB20.
    Executed the transaction BD22 in test run mode, but I am not sure which change pointers option(obsolete or processed) to select for deletion and also which message type. I selected the obsolete option but here too the program got terminated after time out.
    After this I selected  the message type "CREFET" (Get Vendor Data), "CRECOR" (Core vendor master data distribution), "CREMAS" (vendor master data distribution) but there were no change pointers for this message type.
    Besides I am doing this on prduction environment and other integration models like plant etc got activated.
    Please help us with this.
    Regards,
    Gaurav Patil
    Edited by: Gaurav Patil on Sep 29, 2008 12:35 PM
    Edited by: Gaurav Patil on Sep 29, 2008 12:36 PM

    Hi Gaurav,
    Please split the volume in multiple jobs and see wheather it is running fine or not ?
    Also please check CFG1 log on R/3 side .
    Also check SLG1 log on APO side .
    Manish

  • Integration model desnot exist

    Hi,
          I got a error in delta report with the message
    No active integration model exists in R/3
    Message no. /SAPAPO/CIF184
    The material in the plant has a change pointer "R". What does the "R" Change Pointers Exist with Method "Delete Complete Document" mean?
    Is it saying that the location product is scheduled for deletion? Is there a check box checked in APO for deletion??
    Also there is an active integration model with that product, location combination.
    What does the message mean then???
    Thanks.

    You can always check for deletion flags in table /SAPAPO/LOC (check for deletion flag field LVORM) and /sapapo/MATLOC (check for deletion flag field LVORM)
    Change pointer R means Completely Delete Document. This happens when someone deleted an order in APO and the same order deletion has not yet transferred to R3 due to some reason. The reason could be that you have set up change pointers in the system to stop automatic deletion transfer of orders or the fact that integration model does not exist.
    So either make sure you have an active integration model setup for the product or get rid of the change pointer using /sapapo/c5 transaction

  • Integration Models and CCR simultaneously . .

    Dear All,
    i have 2 questions :
    1) Why cant we run two Integration model simultaneously ???
    and
    2) Why cant we run CCR jobs in parallel with planning run ???
    Please let me know your observations and opnions.
    Regards,
    Prasad

    Hi Prasad,
    Below are the answers for your queries.
    1) Why cant we run two Integration model simultaneously ???
    Integration models are the building blocks of both master data and transactional data for APO.  It has to be contructed in APO in a sequence or in a order so that the updation of data can be performed sequentially.  Each data will look into the update of other data.  For example, we need to run integration model for location first and then location-product.  The first run of location will create integration model for location in APO and then when we run subsequently the location-product, the combination will be referred in APO.  If we run both location and location-product together, if location-product tries to update the APO system first(tables) before location data, then it will throw out error and cancel the model run.  Hence, it is advisable to run the models one by one in a sequence.
    2) Why can't we run CCR jobs in parallel with planning run?
    CCR runs will compare the transactional data between both R/3 and APO and display the results.  Planning run will perform the planning based on the selection conditions and it takes data from both R/3 and APO.  The planning results will be transferred from APO to R/3 based on our customisation settings.  During the time, when transfer of results happening, if paralley, comparison of both system data happens via CCR job, it will not give correct data or end up with errors or tries to cancel the job.
    Hope this clarifies your question.
    Please confirm whether you are clarified?
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

  • PI is generated but delivery got cancelled, now i want to generate

    SAP Gurus,
    Actually i generated PI but delivery got cancelled. Now i want to generate Invoice. this is real time issue. kindly tell me the procedure how to rectify this.
    Regards
    K.Kalpana

    hello, friend.
    a pro forma invoice could be order-related.  pro forma invoices do not affect subsequent SD or FI transactions.  they are usually generated as an advance reference for the customer, or to fulfill certain customer or legal requirements.  pro forma invoices do not update statuses of SD documents.
    as the others advise, don't worry too much about the PI.  whether you can create deliveries and invoices or not is not affected by the PI.
    regards.

  • Excise invoice part I entry got cancelled automatically

    Dear Gurus,
    My client has raised a account assigned PO (K) and maintained the material as Asset. while doing GR, he captured excise invoice. while posting normal invoice, he could not able to post because of "part 1 entry got cancelled". now, it is not allowing him to enter through J1IEX also saying no selectable items found.
    can you please let me know, under what circumstances this happens and how to solve the same.
    thanks,
    satish

    >
    Satish Skumar wrote:
    > Dear Gurus,
    >
    > My client has raised a account assigned PO (K) and maintained the material as Asset. while doing GR, he captured excise invoice. while posting normal invoice, he could not able to post because of "part 1 entry got cancelled". now, it is not allowing him to enter through J1IEX also saying no selectable items found.
    >
    > can you please let me know, under what circumstances this happens and how to solve the same.
    >
    > thanks,
    > satish
    Your intial line itself wrong po acct assigned - K for material asset ???
    Check why part 1  is cancelled ?

  • Background job SAP_PERIODIC_ORACLE_SNAPSHOT got cancelled.

    Hi All,
    Background job SAP_PERIODIC_ORACLE_SNAPSHOT got cancelled.
    Im SM37 the log shows that the job has been cancelled because 'No Vendor Specified'
    Is that any variant needs to be specified.
    Please help me on this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Gopi L.

    Hi,
    Please check the SM21 log and the corresponding work process trace (dev_wX - X refers to the work process number used by the job, can be seen from SM21) for errors.
    Best regards,
    Warren

  • Background job got cancelled for the user ----- Isolation and resolution

    Hi Experts,
    One background job got cancelled for the user I have the Jobname and User...
    Able to view the log information in SM37.
    I am not sure what is the next step to do and how to resolve this issue.
    Could any one please provide me the step by step Isolating the issue and resolving it.
    That would be really greatfull.
    Thank you in advance.
    Regards,
    Prem.

    Hi,
    What the error it was stating in that SM37 job log?
    Pls post that error log, not completely just mention the error here we'll try to help you.
    rgds,

Maybe you are looking for

  • Location of compiled java files

    Where are the compiled java files for jsps? Sometimes I get jsp errors in the log files like: D:\jsrv\my\WEB-INF\_tmp_war_myserver_myserver_my\jsp_servlet\_mypage\_cancelmembership.java:105: ')' expected However, the _cancelmembership.java file does

  • Lock for transaction code.

    i have created screen executed with Transaction code,having few Controls inside screen. As soon as I enter action(click push button) inside the screen.(ie Transaction code), this transaction screen should be locked, and other users should not use the

  • ESS Links Description

    Hi all, how to change the description of the personal data link in Personal Information. "Enter,change or delete your data" this description i need to change . where do i need to change in R/3. Regards, rameshb

  • Access properties of the class passed to a thread

    Hi You all, I have the following code: package com.services; import java.util.*; public class Timer implements Runnable      //                         CLASS OBJECTS      private int interval;      private volatile int clockFlag = 0;      //         

  • Demand Planning : Time saved selection

    I would like to have a Moving Range Time selection : If I forecast with 12 monthes History and 6 month forecast horizon, today, I would like to select from November 2005 to April 2007. And I would like that this time window to change automatically ne