Interest in F.2B not required if customer has a credit balance.

Hi all,
When i calculate interest in F.2B, its also calculating if the customer has a credit balance. I dodnot want interest to be calculated if customer has a credit balance.
Could anyone please let me know if there is any setting or any userexit to meet this requirement.
Regards,
SKD

innerCityLets wrote:
=SUMIFS(Bookings::Y,Bookings::I,">"&Table 5 :: F1,Bookings::I,"<="&Table 5 :: G1,Bookings::B2:B645,"=Apartment1")
That's better!
Just for reference, we're working with the syntax: SUMIFS(sum-values, test-values, condition, test-values…, condition…)
The way I understand the problem now, you just need to have two SUMIFS functions added together. The expression would go something like this:
=SUMIFS(Bookings::Y,Bookings::I,">"&Table 5 :: F1,Bookings::I,"<="&Table 5 :: G1,Bookings::B2:B645,"=Apartment1")
+
(Now, we need the same expression again with different parameters...)
SUMIFS(Bookings::Y, Z, "<>"&"",Bookings::I,">"&Table 5 :: F1,Bookings::I,"<="&Table 5 :: G1,Bookings::B2:B645,"=Apartment1")
Note that I have partitioned the parameter pairs by color.
The "Sum-values" parameter is Bookings::Y. Do you wish to use this same column under the second condition? If not, replace it with the proper range.
Next, I added the test for content in Column Z.
After that, there are three more condition pairs. I think I get that the reference to column P becomes a reference to column I. I'll let you work out those details. This method will the totals under one condition added to the totals under another condition. And I have suggested a method for determining whether there as been an input in a cell.
Jerry

Similar Messages

Payment orders when a customer has a credit balance

Hello,
I was able to generate a payment order for a customer. But when a customer has a credit note attached to it that it effectively renders the total as a credit balance, I am unable to do so. When I select on the credit note, it comes up with an error "Enter a payment method for outgoing payments". Is there a way, that I could overcome this error without creating another payment method? Because its possible for this company that the customer can have credit balance even though we should just be collecting money from them.
Thanks and regards,
Tess

Hi,
It is a SAP a standard behavior in case of Debit balance of Vendor or Credit balance of Customer it gives as an error.
Hence, in this case we need to do manual clearing through F-44 for Vendor and F-32 for Customer.
Regards,
Tejas

If a customer has a zero balance in second local currency

If a customer has a zero balance in second local currency but some
balance in company code currency before clearing, we want to keep zero
balance in second local currency after clearing. How can we solve this
problem? Is it possible to clear customer open items using second or
third local currency?
When the customers have several documents in different currencies, we
have the problem below:
We want to analyze the customeru2019s balance in Euro and USD. (second and
third local currencies)
However the invoices and some incoming payments have different document
currencies. Invoices are in document currency TRY, incoming payments
are in document currency Euro or USD. In this case, we plan to use
second or third local currency for deciding balances instead of first
local currency. But when we clear the documents using currency TRY
(local currency), system creates exchange rate difference for TRY and
also for the second and third local currencies. We do not want to have
foreign exchange differences after clearing, for the second or third
currencies since their balances were already zero. After clearing the
balances are not zero anymore, and we do not want this happen.
Thanks for your help in advance.

Hi,
Have you maintained table OABT?
Study the useful documentation about this Tcode in the following Menu path:
SPRO >> Financial Accounting >> Asset Accounting >> Valuation >> Currencies >> Specify the Use of Parallel Currencies
Thanks
Palani

MRP ignore requeriments if the customer has a credit issue

Hi,
We have a new requeriment in our company, we can avoid any purchase if the customer has a credit issue.
This is basically:
1) If the customer has credit problems, block the sale order for his release (credit deparment release this blocked customer orders).
2) While the sales order remain blocked, the MRP must ignore this requeriment.
3) When credit departmen relase the customer order, this new requeriment are now consider by te MRP.
Regards.

Hi
to resolve this issue.... create new risk category or use stgandard 0001 at
Financial Accounting (New)>Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable>Credit Management>Credit Control Account
Assgin the category to customer master in T.Code FD32.
create new credit group at
IMG>Sales & distribution> Basic Functions>Credit Management/Risk Management>Credit Management>Define Credit Groups
assign credit group with the risk profile and set the blocked flag at
IMG>Sales & distribution> Basic Functions>Credit Management/Risk Management>Credit Management>Define Automatic Credit Control
with this setting order will be blocked

Customer opening debit credit balance table

Dear Gurus,
I want to develop zreport customer Vendor ledger in the format Opening Debit Credit balance Is there any table contains Profit Centre , Balance ,Monthly DebitCredit ? There is table which I know but profit centre are not maintained in that table
For Customer KNC1 and
for vendor LFC1
Please help
Regard's
Sai_abap

Hello Shahzaib,
Try Following,
Select acc_id,Opening_balance, DECODE(cb.C, 0, Opening_balance, cb.C), DECODE(Cb.D, 0, Opening_balance,Cb.D)
from COA,
(Select cb_acc_id,sum(nvl(dabit,0)) D ,sum(nvl(credit,0)) C from cb where
cb_acc_id=:p_1 and
vdate < :Date_from
Group by cb_acc_id)CB
Where acc_id=:P_1
Please mark if it help you or correct
Regards,
Danish

Customer statements for credit balances (F.27)

We need to be able to run "Periodic Account Statements in SAP, transaction F.27, for customers that have a credit balance.
For clarity, this is a balance that is less than ZERO, for example if a customer has an outstanding credit item on their account that exceeds any debit amount, eg: invoice for $100, payment for $150, net CREDIT balance of ($50)
In accordance with direction from our auditors, we need to be able to print and send these statements, as we do with the present process of sending monthly statements to customers that have a debit balance, and send them to customers. I'd be really surprised if this functionality is not built into SAP.
My Question is: Can this change be made using a built-in functionality in SAP like make config changes in SAP IMG or would this need to be programmed? If it can be done in SAP by making config changes please post the steps. Thanks.

SOLUTION:
When you run the transaction F.27 you specify a Company code and a Correspondence type. The correspondence type has a print program and a variant associated to it through SAP IMG (config). During its run F.27 calls the program + variant dynamically. The variant controls the selection screen of that print program. One of the fields on that selection screens is "Balance in local currency". The value for that field was set to greater than zero (Balance in local currency > 0). This is why F.27 was skipping any Customer Statements which had a balance less than zero (i.e. credit balance).
You can check the program name and variant associated with a correspondence type by following this path in SAP IMG:
SPRO > SAP Reference IMG > SAP Customizing Implementation Guide > Financial Accounting > Financial Accounting Global Settings > Correspondence > Assign programs for Correspondence Types
and you can modify the variant by using transaction SE38.

Customer Has Exceeded Credit Limit Question

Hi
At the moment when we raise an order for a customer with a credit limit it appears a warning message saying that the customer has exceeded his credit limit.
This information is a bit misleading if the customer has yes exceeded his limit but only because the outstanding invoices are not due yet ie the Due Date may be 31st May 2010.
Is there a way to combine the two information and inform the SAP user when the payments terms for invoices have been exceeded, not just the credit limit?
Thank you.
MB

Hi Matthew ,
Both the thing are different :
1. Credit Limit is only for the Alert or you can block the further transaction .
2. Next you are talking about the Aging report for the outstanding payments .
So both having different aspects , you can not directly combine the both. But if you want then you can use some reporting tools .
Thanks
Ashish

Free goods price discount when free goods are not required by customer

Hi
In a promotional activity for purchase of 10 items 2 free goods (which are different) have been determined, which is exclusive.
The customer wishes not to take the free goods and asks for a discount equivalent to the value of free goods, please advise on steps to be undertaken in this scenario.

Why dont u use "Pricing For Inclusive Free Goods Without Item Generation"
To do this, you can use the standard condition type NRAB. It is set up as follows:
It does not determine the discount from the condition record. It uses condition basis formula 029 in the pricing procedure to determine a discount from the free goods factor.
The condition receives the new pricing requirement 059 in the pricing procedure. This requirement checks whether free goods have already been determined.
The condition type receives condition category f. This condition category ensures that the condition is redetermined every time the quantity is changed, since this can also mean a change to the free goods quantity.
Hope this helps & Rewrad if does
Rgds

Required field in custom content type not required in custom list instance

I have an issue with a custom SharePoint 2013 solution. Among other components, it consists of:
a feature with several custom fields with different types, some of which are taxonomy fields,
a feature with three custom content types using different sets of the custom fields with partially different configuration, e.g. whether they are required or not,
a feature with a custom document library template and instance using two of the custom content types and a default picture library that is programmatically customized when the feature is activated, e.g. it is assigned the third custom content type.
When deploying the solution and activating the feature, everything is set up correctly except a single taxonomy field for one of the doc lib's content types. It is defined to be required in both content types but indeed it does not show up as required for
the default content type whereas everything works fine for the other. And it does not matter which of the two custom content types is defined first (= default) in the list template's schema.xml, the issue always occurs for the same taxonomy field in the doc
lib's default content type. When I use the built-in Document content type as default, the field is required for both custom content types. However, using the Document content type is not an option.
If you think this behavior is not strange enough: When the list content type's field is set required through the SharePoint UI, it becomes optional again when the list column is updated, e.g. its display name is changed.
Any ideas?

Hi,
Thank you for your question.
We are currently looking into this issue and will give you an update as soon as possible.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
Linda Li
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Credit Check not occurring for Customer with Partial Credit limit existing

Hi,
I have a scenario
1) where, if credit limit is crossed, then on creation of order I get an credit check even when i have not entered materials in sales order.
2) Partial Credit limit is pending (for e.g Credit limit of 100, 50 is still pending) when i create a new order with unconfirmed quantity, for amount 100, there is no credit check happening. (system should give message for extra amount 50)
Can I please get guidance on this issue.(2nd point)
Thanks & Regards,
Ganesh.

HI Ganesh,
Your issue is not clear. What do you mean by
2) Partial Credit limit is pending (for e.g Credit limit of 100, 50 is still pending) when i create a new order with unconfirmed quantity, for amount 100, there is no credit check happening. (system should give message for extra amount 50)
Please explain clearly
Thanks
Jobi

Redeemed card and balance applied, though Itune will not let me purchase with balance and keeps referring me to other payment types which I do not want and will not let me purchase with my credit balance.

Had an itunes card, entered the code on the card to redeem it. This all worked fine and it applied the correct balance. Now go to itunes store and it keeps referring me to make purchase with other payment types rather than letting me purchase with my current Apple ID balance. I have ensured I am on the latest version of iTunes though still getting the same issue.

See Here for
Contact iTunes Customer Service
http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact.html

Bind Variable : required - no message, not required - error

hi
Please consider the example application created using JDeveloper 11.1.1.6.0
at http://www.consideringred.com/files/oracle/2012/RequiredOrNotBVarApp-v0.01.zip
It has these View Objects defined
- EmployeesReqNoValueBVarVO which has a required Bind Variable, and where clause "last_name like '%' || :LastNameBVar || '%'"
- EmployeesNotReqNoValueBVarVO which has a NOT required Bind Variable, and where clause "(:LastNameBVar is null or last_name like '%' || :LastNameBVar || '%')"
The Bind Variable in both View Objects does NOT have a value (no default value, not programmatically set, not entered by the user, ...).
This "no value set" aspect could be the result of a "development error", but the resulting observed behaviour is at least "peculiar".
- scenario (sc1) : run "try tryEmployeesReqNoValueBVarVO", see a table filled with rows and NO message about the required Bind Variable
- scenario (sc2) : run "try tryEmployeesNotReqNoValueBVarVO", see "No data to display." in the table and the "Missing IN or OUT parameter at index:: 1" error for the NOT required Bind Variable for a where clause that can deal with null values
- question (q1) How can be explained that scenario (sc1) does not result in an error message about the required Bind Variable (and scenario (sc2) does result in an error message about the NOT required Bind Variable)?
- question (q2) What does the "Required" checkbox for a Bind Variable really mean for Bind Variables used in a where clause of a View Object?
If the described behaviour can be reproduced (using RequiredOrNotBVarApp-v0.01.zip), confirmations are welcome.
(Aspects of these scenario's could be related to forum thread "Bind variable required/not required: strange behaviour".)
many thanks
Jan Vervecken

Thanks for your reply Frank.
Frank Nimphius wrote:
... your query actually is dependent on the existence of the bind variable because the bind variable is used in the where clause part. ...Sure, and the Bind Variable does exist (in both (sc1) and (sc2)).
... This has nothing to do with whether the bind variable value is checked for NULL and if the value it contains is NULL performs an "all you can eat" type of query. Because the existing, NOT required Bind Variable has not been given a value in scenario (sc2), the check for NULL only makes more explicit that NULL is a valid value for the SQL statement.
... Non required bind variables are used in the context of view criteria to avoid missing IN or OUT parameters. ...The "Required" checkbox for a Bind Variable is also available/enabled when the Bind Variable is not used in a View Criteria (in both (sc1) and (sc2)).
... In the case of a view criteria, the VO query may be executed without the view criteria applied and for this reason should not fail only because the defined bind variable is not provided. ...No View Criteria in the scenario's (sc1) and (sc2) I descirbe.
... If you run the query in the tester, you get
(java.sql.SQLException) Missing IN or OUT parameter at index:: 1
and no query is executed at all for EmployeesNotReqNoValueBVarVOSure, that matches scenario (sc2), but the Bind Variable can be configured as NOT required, how can it be missing?
The JDeveloper help page "Create or Edit Bind Variables Dialog - Variable Page" says:
"... Alternatively, you can use the SQL Statement page of the Edit View Objects dialog to enter a parameterized WHERE clause. Note that the bind variables you enter in a parameterized SQL WHERE clause will require a valid value at runtime or a runtime exception error will be thrown. ..."
So, null as a valid value, seems to explain the behaviour in scenario (sc1).
"... In contrast, when you create a view criteria filter condition that references a named bind variable, you can specify whether the value is required or optional. ..."
But, the "Required" checkbox is also available (to uncheck) for Bind Variables that are not used in a View Criteria.
Specifically for the "Required" checkbox the help page says : "... Select if you want to make the value of a name bind variable required for any usage the references the named bind variable. For example, when the value is required (default), all view criteria items that reference the named bind variable will fail to execute unless a valid value is supplied at runtime. Alternatively, you can leave the value not required and use the Create View Criteria dialog to specify whether or not individual view criteria items require the value. ..."
Again, the focus is on View Criteria, although it can also be unchecked (configuring as NOT Required) for Bind Variables that are not used in a View Criteria (which does not seem to be something you should do).
But, still, there is a perspective here that makes this possibly very confusing:
- a View Object where clause with a required Bind Variable, no value set --> results in rows, and NO message about a missing value
- a View Object where clause with a NOT required Bind Variable, no value set --> results in no rows, and a message about a missing value
regards
Jan

Customer Credit Balance

Hello all,
Does anyone know what the best way is to send a customer with a credit balance a dunning statement/account statement/letter to inform them of unclaimed assets.(escheatment)

Hi,
Good evening and greetings,
In the dunning procedure, FBMP transaction code click on the Dunning Levels and inside the dunning levels there is an option under the print parameter tab to print all items...Check that box and the system would include even the credit line items lying in the customer account and that can be printed out.
Please reward points if found useful
Thanking you
With kindest regards
Ramesh Padmanabhan

I am NOT a Verizon Customer nor is my number a Verizon number. So why am I receiving automated spam for them saying "Verizon we care about you. Thank you. And have a nice day"??? Who do I contact to get them to stop? Most everywhere I've looked required m

I am NOT a Verizon Customer nor is my number a Verizon number. So why am I receiving automated spam for them saying "Verizon we care about you. Thank you. And have a nice day"??? Who do I contact to get them to stop? Most everywhere I've looked required me to be a Verizon Customer in order to contact them....Even calling the number back tells me to enter my number and then tells me I'm not a Verizon Customer. Dial 611. Then hangs up on me...

This is one of the drawbacks with cellular numbers. The device number at one time was used by a Verizon customer. They may have changed it or more than likely ported to the service you are on then either gave it up, or changed it. You as a customer then get it.
The only solution I can recommend is have your service change the number. However depending on who had it previously you may have more texts and spam calls. Or may get lucky and get none.
Good Luck

An accounting document is not required for this billing document

Hi,
While releasing the billing document to accounting the error is coming like "An accounting document is not required for this billing document"
Diagnosis:
The billing document has the net value '0' and does not create an accounting document. Despite this, the posting status 'C' (Posting document has been created) is set internally for this billing document.
But the net value is coming in the sales order and alsi into the Billing document.
gurus plz help me.
regards,
ragesh.

Goto VOFA screen and check for ur billing type , what is assigned in the document type field?.
Also please check, the posting block is activated. if it is, please remove.
Also goto the accounting document type settings at OBA7, check whether the customer field is ticked under the account type allowed tab.
Please let me know, whether ur problem solved..
Reward points if useful..

Interest in F.2B not required if customer has a credit balance.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for