Internal Order Receiver category.

Hi Gurus,
Please tell me the significance of receiver category in Internal Order master data.
And the receiver type following need to settle for which??
1. FXA - for Fixed Assets
2.CTR - for Cost Center for product costing
3.ORD - ???
4.G/L - ????
And in Control data of IO master data the significance of system status & Allowed transactions is for what ??
How can we know the order is locked and by whom ??
Thanks,
Raj

Hi,
The signification of Receiver Category is Vital for
1. FXA- This will be Created as Fixed Assets and will be capitalsed in Books it will show in FA and in Asset Module it will be Asset in Asset Register.
2. Cost Center - Generally Maintenence orders will be settled to Cost Centers so that maintenance cost will be available on order basis as will as the cost will be captured in Correct cost center.
3. Order:- Generally in the Scenario where material issued against  production order ,  in that case that will be settled against production order or Material (Finished Part) so that the status of WIP and Finished goods depends on the Order Status Like DLV(Delivered) or Tech (Techinically completed).
4.GL :- Generally in some companies they want to capture the Development cost seperately (mainly in Automobiles) so that all the expese to a particular order type will be settled to Particular GL (New Product Cost Account).
regards
N.Kumar

Similar Messages

  • Internal Order Budgeting with Purchase Order

    Hi,
    I am creating a purchase order for a material with account assigned as Order.
    I have maintained a substitution wherein from a cost center Internal Order is derived.
    I have created an Internal Order with Category - Overhead and activated the availability control for the Order. Also maintained the Budget for the Internal Order.
    Now when I am creating the Purchase Order and giving the Cost center, it is deriving the Internal order but not doing the availability check.
    What can be the issue in terms of Configuration or Am I missing any steps.
    Please help
    Regards
    Kami

    Thanks Eli,
    If I activate the committment Management at Controlling Area level and the order type, the budget will be consumed at the Purchase Order level itself. I hope I am right ?
    But I want , at PO level only the control and check (in terms of error message and the system should not allow me to save the PO) and not the consumption of budget. I want to utilise the budget only at the time of issuance of the materials.
    Can we achieve this without Committment management active or is it mandatory?
    Any help on this.
    Thanks and regards
    Kami

  • PM order settlement to Internal order

    Hi,
    I have a requirement to create work order without any refrence objects.During Teco ,System asks for the settlement rule.
    Can PM Work Order be settled to internal orders?
    Regards
    Anil Kumar
    Edited by: Anil Kumar on May 11, 2010 8:18 AM

    You will not be able to have the same number as the internal order as they are stored in the same table (AUFK)
    PM/CS order are category 30 and internal orders are category 01 (AUFK-AUTYP)
    PeteA

  • Internal order creation for wbs element

    hi
    I want to settle internal order for wbs element ,but while creating internal order in KO01,required Order type type not appearing mean in my company wbs element required for order type PS01,Category -20(network),so for this 20 cat. where should i create internal order.please advise me
    thanks
    chandu

    Hi,
    you can't use the order type related to category is 20, because it will use full only PS. you can create the internal order with category 10 and maintain the settlement rule said that to be settled at WBS element.
    Thanks and Regards
    Nagaraju SSV

  • Regarding receiver category in sales order.

    hi Gurus,
                 I am facing a problem in making Sales Order, the problem is as follows: -
    I have enter the all input to make SO, like sold-to-party, division, qty, etc.
    But, by cliking enter i got a massage " receiver category is not allowed by SD1 settlement profile"
    I check the parameter of receiver category as well as settlement profile, but i can't understand it.
    please any one tell me to how to solve this problem?
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Shripad

    Hi
    It is some thing to do with settlement profile for the sales order.
    you better coordinate with your CO collegue for solvin this.
    Regards
    YMREDDy

  • Budgeting thru Internal Order with Account assignment category 'A'

    Dear All
    I want Budgeting thru Internal Order with Account assignment category 'A'
    i.e
    Created Assets with Tcode As01
    Created Internal Order and assigned budget amount to IO with Tcode KO01 and KO22
    Created Purhcase Requisition with Account assignment catg as 'A' i.e asstes. Also given Internal Order No and Asset code in PR.
    Releases PR with ME54N
    Created Purchase Order with Account assignemnt catg as 'A' i.e asstes.  In Purchase Order it displays Internal Order No. and Asset code which i have given in PR in Account assignemnt tab on Item level
    Released Purchase Order.
    Now i am checking budget detail in Tcode : S_ALR_87013019  -> List: Budget/Actual/Commitments ,  Here it gives message , "No line item were selected " in Commitment line items.
    Actually  my requirement is , i want budgeting thru internal order and want to use Account assignment category as 'A' (Assets) in PR and PO.
    Why it's not showing detail in report S_ALR_87013019  .
    What is solution for my requirement. Is it possible with some configuration or by other options.
    Thanx & Regards
    Swati Shah

    Hi Swati,
    You can do this in Asset Accounting. By standard MIGO Posting Date is taken as capitalization date for asset. You can configure to make it 'Document Date'.
    So, whenever user is posting thru MIGO, he will have better control on deciding capitalization date by inputting appropriate date in Document Date Field in MIGO.
    Check this thread..
    Re: Depreciation start date for asset thru MIGO
    Regards,
    Sayujya

  • Account assignment category for cost centre and statistical internal order

    When issuing purchase order, we use account assignment category u2018Fu2019 for (PM) order, and u2018Ku2019 for cost centre.  What account assignment category to use, when issuing purchase order, if we want to charge to both cost centre (as mandatory) and statistical internal order (as optional entry field)?
    Do you create custom account assignment category for that purposes? 
    I reviewed Note 305385 but do not think it's relevant to us.

    Hi Stacy
    you can create a custom acct assgn category (AAC) in OME9... COPY the K to Z and make changes in it
    However, I feel the Std AAC K should serve your purpose if you want to have Cost Ctr as mandatory and Order as Optional
    Br, Ajay M

  • Internal order for receiver types

    Hi,
    Is  possible to set up an additional order +_*for receiver types*_  that can settle to an asset account number. presently we donu2019t have this type but it may be use full for track our assets.
    It is very urgent I will assign points
    Thanks
      Radha

    Is it at the time of creation of Internal order master data or at the time of posting entries to the Internal Order?
    Can you explain in detail?

  • Account assignment category to be used in ME21N -Statistical internal order

    Hi Gurus,
    I have assigned budget(KO22) for a statistical internal order for budget controlling purpose.
    Now I wanted to create a PO in ME21N, so that it should commit that amount in statistical internal order.
    As the expenses GL account is used i have to give a cost center, and i have to give this statistical internal order also. So that when booking exceeds the budget amount in statistical order it should display error message.
    I tried creating PO with Account assignment group 3 (Cost center +internal order valuated), and i can not see any records in KOB2 or in the report S_ALR_87012993. PO is created even when the PO amount exceeds budget amount.
    However it is not allowing invoice posting when exceeding budget.
    Can you please tell me with what account assignment group i have to create PO, so that the PO should not be created when the net price amount exceeds statistical internal order amount.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Diva

    Hi
    Pls verify the following links and correct your settings
    http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1886939
    http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1968328
    http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1266987
    Reg
    Vishnu

  • Gr/IR clearing for a PO with Internal Order assigment

    Hi,
    We settle Internal order (IO)  to fixed assets.  The settlement rule is to settle the COst Element to External account .Settlement receiver is Fixed asset account.
    The Asset procured using  Service PO and we assign the Internal Order  and account assignment category 'K'  for the PO . we receive GR  ( 1000 USD)and then IR ( 600) . IR is less than the GR and is more than the tolerance . In MIRO transaction we adjust the( line item  amount from 1000 to 600 to match with IR) and post the invoice of 600.
    Now GR/IR account there is a differece.
    When we try to run GR/IR the item is not selected for Clearing with a mesage the clearing cannot be carried out as the Cost element is assigned for External account and should  and hence it cannot be cleared.
    How do I run Gr/IR clearing to adjust the difference amount.
    What is the right way to use an Internal order  in a PO with accout assignment 'K" Is it not  the right way?
    I can think of 2 options biut both are not straight forward. Hope many of you would have faced similar situation and appreciate to get yr experience/Suggestion  for this. Anyhow I  put forth the following options  as below
    Option 1. Change the GL account assignment  in PO and then settle it. Pass a JV to adjust the difference beiween 2 GL accounts.
    Option 2  : Use a temp Interna Order for PO with different CE and then Transfer the amount from Temp IO to another IO which is having settlement rule to settle it to Fixed asset. so no  issue of clash of cost elements.
    Appreciate your early response on this
    Regards,
    Chitras

    resolved

  • Error while running Internal Order Settlement (KO88)

    Hi,
    We are in ECC 6.  We are facing an error while settling one internal order using T.Code KO88.
    The error message says :
    Execute amount settlement up to and including settlement period 001 2009 first
    Message KD262
    We have already settled the internal order upto previous month. But, we are unable to settle the order for the current month.
    Any suggestion please.
    Regards,
    Ganesan

    In production Order maintain Settlement type as Full Settlement.
    In CO01 Create production Order or CO02 Change production order go to
    Header -
    > Settlement Rule
    Maintain Category, Receiver, Percentage, FUL (as settlement type)
    Change settlement type to FUL if it is PER.
    PER Settlement Type - Only settles the cost incurred on the posting period
    FUL Settlment Type - Settles all the cost incurred after the previous costing run

  • Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1 for Internal Order

    Hi,
    During Internal order settlement through KO88 I am getting this error as :
    Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1
    Diagnosis :
    During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups  (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters). Cost element 430500 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure K1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a  settlement cost element.
    Procedure :
        Possible solutions are as follows:
        o   If the posting under cost element 430500 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
        o   If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
    a)  You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose
        "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.  If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted  in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement  rule.
    -   You can update allocation structure K1
    The same configuration in  Development Server there is no error but problem occurs in Quality server. Here the process is Internal Order creation - Creation of Reservation through MB21- Goods Issue against reservation  through MB1A and finally settlement through KO88.  During settlement this error occur. In configuration setting of allocation structure under Internal Order I have mentioned only revenue settlement (as per business) against assignments. Under source mentioned cost element group and under settlement cost elment Receiver Cat is "CTR" and tick "By Cost Element".
    During MB1A i.e, goods issue accounting entry is generated as
    81(Dr). 430500 Constimptuion Saprae and Stores
    99(Cr). 310411 Inventory Machinery and Spare.
    During settlement this debit figure should credit. But not allowiing to credit. Even in configuration under settlement cost element if I remove the tick of "By cost element" and mention secondary gl account whose cost element category is 21, still showing the same error in QA server. What may be the probabale solution ? Even if i remove allocation structure K1 from settlement profile 20 still same error exist. How this link gets during settlment inspite of removing allocation structure from settlement profile...
    NB.. COPA is not implemented in our company. So PA structure should not arrise here....
    Thanks & regards,
    Samrat
    Edited by: Samrat Roy on Aug 30, 2010 7:28 PM

    Hi Samrat,
    The issue is very simple.. Cost element 430500  is posted in your IO...
    While settling you have 2 options... Either you can credit the original GL account 430500.. This happens when you tick "By Cost element".. This you have done already...
    2nd option is not to tick "By Cost element" and assign a secondary cost ele category 21...
    But for any of these options to work, you have to include GL 430500 in the "source"... The above 2 options apply only to those GL accounts which are mentioned in the "Source".... for rest of the GL accounts, system gives this error
    Include 430500 in your "source" cost ele group.. Error will be resolved
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Settlement of PM order over Internal order

    In order to control revenue budget from being over run we have developed Internal orders in controlling with the combination of Cost Centre & GL Code. The internal order are statistical in nature.
    We are facing the following problem:
    1. In PM order (IW31) settlement rule is defined as following:
                      1.1     CAT "Order"
                      1.2     Settlement Receiver "3440-2360010  3440"
                      1.3     Amount 1000
                      1.4     Settlement Type is Full
    2. The problem occurs when there are different internal orders
    3. After we run settlement rule (KO88) it runs successfully.
    4. KSB1 report shows that the amount is split among all the settlement receivers
    5. Whereas requirement is that amount against a particular internal order should be charged to its GL account and cost centre only.

    Dear Sreenivas Kadiam,
    I go to spro-----Plant Maintenance and Customer Service--Maintenance and Service Processing---Basic Settings----
    General Order Settlement------Maintain Allocation Structures.
    The following allocation structures are already defined:
    A1     CO allocation structure
    A2     No split
    PM     PM allocation structure
    PR     PARCO Allocation Structure 
    I could not find the (settlement cost elements setting should be 'BY COST ELEMENT' for receiver category ORD.)
    Please advise
    Regards
    Aftab Ahmed Khan

  • Service PO Commitment with refrence to stasticall Internal Order is not get

    PO is created with Account assigned to Internal Order stastically and Cost center as real cost object. Wih PO creation we check commitment in system
    According to standard SAP, at creation of PO, system creates commitment & while doing GR/IR, system should reduce PO commitment and increase actual by that amount. Service PO is created for amount 239200 USD with Account Assigned Category K, Item category D, Account assigned to Cost Center & Statistical Orders (9 orders by approximate 11% ) So, initially there is commitment of 26000 USD on each service order. However from March 2009 onward business has done GR and IR for this PO approximate 50000 USD but nor commitment have reduced neither any commitment line item were posted in system.
    As a result of it, business actual budget is fully consumed by (Commitment + Actual) and while doing IR budget deficient errors is received.
    Here main problem is, non reduction of Service PO commitment while doing GR and IR.
    Tried below approch so far.
    CoAr / Order type Comitment acitive, Costcenter updates commitment and GL is valid on delivery date. Service PO order unit is JOB and commitment reduction is based on value match with PO details.
    In order to test really probelm is with Commitment updation or reporting. I checked COOI and COSP with reference to object no.
    but there is only one posting in line item of original PO amount and at total level there are two posting one is origiona one and seocind is with zero amount. but in both total line item for one of the peiod quantity is incomplete even after clicking Final Invoice.
    Even after final Invoice ticked thre is not commitment line item gets posted in system. Even I run RKANBU01 program.
    This is quite strange, if some one can give me other suggestion to proceed further.
    With Regards
    Nitin P.

    This issue got resolved with OSS. There is technical glitch when you upgrade to EH4.0 and use valuated GR with multiple account assignment. Below is list of notes required to be apply in sequence. (1492317,
    1491430, 1505733 & 1484993)
    With Regards
    Nitin P.

  • Settlement from internal order to asset under construction

    HI All,
    I have allocated some labors hours cost from production cost centers to real order which is created for allocating the internal cost to asset under construction.
    when i allocate the labor hours by using the "KB21N" it has used the secondary cost element that is "Internal activity allocation" cost element "1200002".
    i have given the source cost element "1200002" which is created as "internal activity allocation" and in settlement cost elements folder i have given receiving category is "FXA" and selected by cost element check box. i selected required entry field in settlement profile and assigned in order type.
    when i do the settlement to asset under construction from internal order it is showing bellow errow.
    "Settlement by cost element not possible due to secondary cost element
    Message no. KD553
    Diagnosis
    You want to settle the secondary cost element 1200002 by cost element to an asset or G/L account, which is not allowed.
    Procedure
    Extend your allocation structure R3, so that secondary cost elements are not settled by cost element, but with a settlement cost element."
    please let me know the problem and where i did mistake. give me the solution
    thanks in advance
    Mr.Rao

    HI,
    in your allocation structure R3 you entered in the view "Settlement cost element" that settlement receiver categoy FXA receives values "by cost element". This is only possible for primary cost elements. For internal activities do not tick "by cost element" but use a settlement cost element with cost element category "22".
    best regards, Christian

Maybe you are looking for