Internal order service maintenance WIP/COS

Dear Gurus,
-there is a maintenance service order
-it is in release status
-did KO88 settlement
-some amounts appearing in WIP a/c for this order
-user wants that as sales is issued the amount in WIP a/c should go to Cost of Sales
any help appreciated?

Required config already done in OKG3 & cancellation of WIP and posting to COS also took place in earlier occasions by the concerned.
Now, Sept period 9 is also closed.
please help with steps how the amt appearing in WIP a/c from period May to Sept to be disappeared and posting to Cost of sales is required.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Internal Order Vs. Maintenance Order

Dear All.
Greetings of the day
We have a scenario in which settlement receiver is internal order , and internal order have budget profile .
how can we link the maintenane order to internal order wrt to budget , means system should not allow to exceed the budget assigned in internal order.
right now what is happening is system does not stop to exceed the budget limit but settle only amount that is assigned to intenrnal order which is receiver in Maintenance order.
and how can we link material procurment through maintenance order as non stock item to internal order ( when settlement receiver is internal order)
Thanks in advance
Armaan

Khan we are already using the same , internal order as settlement receiver in Maintenance order of that object , but the budget assigned in internal order is not reflecting in maintenance order
for example internal order have budget 100 rs. for any asset ( as equipment ) and we need to do some maintenance work on that equipment hence create a M.O. for that equipment , now there should be control that we can not use more that 100 rs on this maintenance order , for example we nee spare of worth rs. 200 on this order , and system should allow more than 100,
but here no control of it
and also we are facing a problem that we get settlement of 100 only instead of 200,
so my query is how to control this ?
Armaan

Internal Order Master Maintenance

Hi Gurus,
I have created an internal order but I have missed out the functional area field after the order is saved. When in change mode (KO02), the field is greyed out.
How can I change this field to be able to input the functional area?
I tried to check the field status under order type and it set as 'input' mode, so i was wondering other that this field setting, where is the control of the change field fo internal order master data.
Points will be rewarded.
Many thanks!

Thanks Satya for your reply,
Yes, you are right the cost of accunting is not activate for the company code that i work on.
I tried to test an internal order creation (KO01) whereby the functional area is filled and upon enter the func. area is grey out with value even before i save the internal order.
why is it so? It is mainly because the cost of accounting is not activate then the?
If this is the reason then how can the functional area is active during the creation of internal order.
Appreciate your kind assistance on this.
Many thanks!

Budget Process (Linked the maintenance Order into Internal Order) in EAM

Dear Experts,
Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM & FICO module live w.e.f. 2007 (PM not live)
Process Managed thru Internal Order (Order Type: RPMT)
Budget managed through Investment Management (IM); Budget is directly entered against the IO using transaction IM52
Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM, FICO & PM module live (PM went live in 2010)
It was proposed to assign budget against each Maintenance Order. Since the number of maintenance orders being used is very high, it was decided to link the MO & IO so that budget will be assigned to the IO and when the MO is settled against the IO, the budget in IO can be deducted accordingly. The proposed process to assign budget in Internal Order against each Maintenance Order are given below-:
1.)     In EAM process one can plan/procure material and External Services only when the Maintenance Order is created & released but practically it has to be planned long before any Maintenance Activity (Maintenance Order to be linked with the estimate so that PO can be created against the estimate).
2.)     The no. of Maintenance Order generated in EAM Module is very large as Maintenance order is created for almost each and every maintenance activity. It is cumbersome to allocate the budget to each and every maintenance order. There should be a single estimate for maintenance activity (as in MM module) and that should be linked to maintenance order so that the actual cost of Indent/Service Entry Sheet can be deducted automatically from the estimate (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
3.)      While doing return Indent the cost of return material is not being added to the maintenance order automatically (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
4.)      If Material & External Services not planned in the maintenance order (estimate), the user must be able to do that through Internal Order (estimate), hence the Internal Order must be link to the Maintenance Order. They should able to record the planned & actual cost in the maintenance Order.
Process followed:
1.) Created Internal Order in KO01 for Repair & Maintenance Order Type
     Assigned budget to Internal Order thru IM52
2.) Created PM order and assigned Internal order against Settlement Order in tab
     u2018Locationu2019 and in Settlement Rule with 100%. In this Section attach the Internal
     Order with selection type u2018ORDu2019.
3.) Released both orders and issue the Material for particular Operation and then
     determine the Cost for material .After that performed MIGO for consumption of
     materials.
4.) Settled the PM order in KO88.
     Settlement process was successfully saved.
Problem faced:
After posting the goods movement (against each Maintenance Order) and settlement of the maintenance order against IO, we still find the budget assigned to the IO is not consumed/deducted.
1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
    immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
    maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly
    added to the available budget of internal order.
3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by
    maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal
    order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
4. It must not be allowed to create reservation from the internal order of order type
     RPMT.
5. In case of external service in the maintenance order, the unit of
     measure in the requisition is set to u201CD (days)u201D by default. System does not allow
     changing the unit of measure in the requisition (it should allow to change the unit
     of measure or set the unit of measure u201CJOBu201D).
6.) When the material is issued from the store through reservation generated in
     maintenance order, system does not check for budget in Internal Order
     (estimate)/Maintenance Order while issuing material from store.
Thanks & Regards
Deepak Soni

Hi,
1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
As per the standard system budgeting is done against the actual cost only. And until you settle your order the actual cost from
maint order are not getting transfered to IO. Once they are transfered system is checking for the budget.
2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly added to the available budget of internal order.
This is similar to first point, when you return goods there will be negative cost on the order, this has to be settled until that system will not compare the IO budget with maintenance order actual cost.
3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
The budget you have assigned is at IO, how can system will check the budget while issueing goods for maintenance order. We may have to develop or use some user exit over here. Which will trigger checking of budget from the settlement receiver IO for that maintenance order.
I think you may have to go for development. These are my observations from my experience.
Regards,
NNR

Add the budget profile in the order type Maintenance Order

Dear Experts,
Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM & FICO module live w.e.f. 2007 (PM not live)
Process Managed thru Internal Order (Order Type: RPMT)
Budget managed through Investment Management (IM); Budget is directly entered against the IO using transaction IM52
Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM, FICO & PM module live (PM went live in 2010)
It was proposed to assign budget against each Maintenance Order. Since the number of maintenance orders being used is very high, it was decided to link the MO & IO so that budget will be assigned to the IO and when the MO is settled against the IO, the budget in IO can be deducted accordingly. The proposed process to assign budget in Internal Order against each Maintenance Order are given below-:
1.) In EAM process one can plan/procure material and External Services only when the Maintenance Order is created & released but practically it has to be planned long before any Maintenance Activity (Maintenance Order to be linked with the estimate so that PO can be created against the estimate).
2.) The no. of Maintenance Order generated in EAM Module is very large as Maintenance order is created for almost each and every maintenance activity. It is cumbersome to allocate the budget to each and every maintenance order. There should be a single estimate for maintenance activity (as in MM module) and that should be linked to maintenance order so that the actual cost of Indent/Service Entry Sheet can be deducted automatically from the estimate (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
3.) While doing return Indent the cost of return material is not being added to the maintenance order automatically (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
4.) If Material & External Services not planned in the maintenance order (estimate), the user must be able to do that through Internal Order (estimate), hence the Internal Order must be link to the Maintenance Order. They should able to record the planned & actual cost in the maintenance Order.
Process followed:
1.) Created Internal Order in KO01 for Repair & Maintenance Order Type
Assigned budget to Internal Order thru IM52
2.) Created PM order and assigned Internal order against Settlement Order in tab
u2018Locationu2019 and in Settlement Rule with 100%. In this Section attach the Internal
Order with selection type u2018ORDu2019.
3.) Released both orders and issue the Material for particular Operation and then
determine the Cost for material .After that performed MIGO for consumption of
materials.
4.) Settled the PM order in KO88.
Settlement process was successfully saved.
Problem faced:
After posting the goods movement (against each Maintenance Order) and settlement of the maintenance order against IO, we still find the budget assigned to the IO is not consumed/deducted.
1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly
added to the available budget of internal order.
3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by
maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal
order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
4. It must not be allowed to create reservation from the internal order of order type
RPMT.
5. In case of external service in the maintenance order, the unit of
measure in the requisition is set to u201CD (days)u201D by default. System does not allow
changing the unit of measure in the requisition (it should allow to change the unit
of measure or set the unit of measure u201CJOBu201D).
6.) When the material is issued from the store through reservation generated in
maintenance order, system does not check for budget in Internal Order
(estimate)/Maintenance Order while issuing material from store.
7.) My first problem is every time running the cost settlement(KO88) is maindetory.Without running cost settlement, How we can settle the actual amount of MO with IO (Estimate budget).
2.) As you know that I have assigned the budget in IO.How system will check the budget while issuing the goods for maintenance order.So will please tell me that which user-exit is used over here.
Thanks & Regards,

Hi Deepak1103,
Well, obviously you will have to settle the costs incurred at the maintenance order. The internal order should be mentioned in the settlement order field in the location tab of the maintenance order. What you can do is to ask your ABAP person to activate this enhancement IWO10004: Maintenance order: Customer check for order completion, use the CAUFVD structure to get the internal order number, then use the BAPI BAPI_INTERNALORDER_GETDETAIL and pass the details to the function module BBPG_BUDGET_CHECK and check the actual cost against the required budget. In case of a conflict raise an error other wise run the function module CK_F_IH_ORDER_SETTLE to settle the costs of the maintenance order to the internal order. Budget would also be consumed and you can verify the same in S_ALR_87013019.
Regards,
Muhammad Usman Kahoot

Down payment against the Internal Order - for Capital Expenditure

Dear friends
I am getting an error while making down payment against the purchase order.
The order of my entries or steps are as follows:
Created one internal order for Capital WIP with budget and availability control activation.
Created one purchase order against a vendor with reference to the above Internal Order.
When I am making the down payment to the vendor through tcode:F-48, the system throwing an error
"Define Cost Elements for Down Payments".
Can any one please explain why this error is coming. When I checked in Internal orders, there is a TCode: OKEP for Define Default Cost Elements for Down Payments.
System is asking for cost element, but where as what ever the down payment we are making is nothing but advance which is current asset. Why system is asking for cost element?
Can any one give me the guidance how to handle the issue.
Thanks in Advance
Kiran Kumar A

The reason is when you want the down payment for AUC to be capitalised, then you would need to create cost element for Downpayments.
Normally as per design of SAP, down payment being a Balance Sheet Account (Current Asset as you rightly mentioned) doesnot need / accept an Cost object, as a special case since down payments for AUC needs to be capitalised and hence need to be carried to Controlling (Internal Order) by creating Cost Element for Downpayments.
Go ahead and create the cost element. That would resolve your issue.

Internal Order Error

Dear friends
I am getting an error while making down payment against the purchase order.
The order of my entries or steps are as follows:
Created one internal order for Capital WIP with budget and availability control activation.
Created one purchase order against a vendor with reference to the above Internal Order.
When I am making the down payment to the vendor through tcode:F-48, the system throwing an error
"Define Cost Elements for Down Payments".
Can any one please explain why this error is coming. When I checked in Internal orders, there is a TCode: OKEP for Define Default Cost Elements for Down Payments.
System is asking for cost element, but where as what ever the down payment we are making is nothing but advance which is current asset. Why system is asking for cost element?
Can any one give me the guidance how to handle the issue.

The reason is when you want the down payment for AUC to be capitalised, then you would need to create cost element for Downpayments.
Normally as per design of SAP, down payment being a Balance Sheet Account (Current Asset as you rightly mentioned) doesnot need / accept an Cost object, as a special case since down payments for AUC needs to be capitalised and hence need to be carried to Controlling (Internal Order) by creating Cost Element for Downpayments.
Go ahead and create the cost element. That would resolve your issue.

PM order creation with refrence to internal order

Hi all
I want to create PM order with the refernce of Internal Order.PM order should also have the same number as that of Internal order. Please guide how it is to be done.
Regards
Anil

Anil,
Internal order and Maintenance order are of two different order category. I dont think you will be able to create maintenance order with ref to internal order.
DP

How to create a service order and check the internal order in R/3

Required Solution:
1. How to copy existing service order and create new one and check the internal order in R/3, whether the certain service order is correctly created in r/3, can you polease explain the steps plz.
2. If i am creating service order by service template finally the service order is getting created but it is not showing me in the table iaom_crm_aufk, how to check this.
can any one help me in this issues as soon as possible.

Hello Zita,
Try to restart your portal after creating ServiceUser in both UME and KM.
One more major difference between ServiceUser and normal portal user is that a ServiceUser does not have a UserAccount (IUserAccount)
Object serviceContext = null;
 try {
 serviceContext = AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedExceptionAction() {
 public Object run() throws WcmException {
 return ResourceFactory.getInstance().getServiceContext(CONTRACT_SERVICE_USER);
 } catch (PrivilegedActionException e) {
 logger.severe(e, "ResourceContext for the technical " + serviceUser +
 " user could not be retrieved.");
IResourceContext resCtx = (IResourceContext) serviceContext;
So I modify all KM resources with this resCtx.
Hope this helps ...
Greetings,
Praveen Gudapati
p.s. Points are always welcome for helpful answers

Exit / badi for individual service line item detail with internal orders.

Hello guys,
Issue 1.as per our scenario we want to get the individual service line item details with Internal Orders.
Please provide me any exit/badi with each item level with individual service line item Internal Orders.
Issue 2: Remain same for issue 3 for blocking status. We want to delete item level for particular line what about the service rows which assigned in particular item.
point will be rewarded for the suitabel answers.
please give me response ASAP.
With Regards
yogesh

Hey Yogesh,
I have the same scenario... Could you please drop a mail to [email protected] with the details of BADI and other details that you implemted for the same.
Thanks a lot in advance.

Internal Order creation in ECC after creation of Service Contract in CRM

Hi,
I hv created Service Contract in CRM, but there is no internal order created referring this in ECC. Even no errors in CRM. What shall i chk for this.
rgds,
balu

Number range was changed in ECC for internal orders

Service/maintenance order type SM01 not completely maintained in plant 1001

Dear All,
Am trying to configure Service Management where there is a scenario in which , when the user creates a Sales order for a installation item say TV or Fridge, automatically Service order has to be generated.
I have checked all the item Category Settings but am getting an error
Service/maintenance order type SM01 not completely maintained in plant 1001
Message no. IW216
Diagnosis
For the selected order type and plant, no check control is maintained in Plant Maintenance/Service in 'Availability Check for Materials, PRTs and Capacities'.
Procedure
A check control must be maintained for this combination of order type and plant.
Can anyone throw some light on this as i know you would have faced this problem.
Satish

Nothing

Service/maintenance order type SM03 not completely maintained in plant 1000

Dear experts,
when I use T-code:iw31 create a service order,It show the following error message:
Service/maintenance order type SM03 not completely maintained in plant 1000
Message no. IW216
Diagnosis
For the selected order type and plant, no check control is maintained in Plant Maintenance/Service in 'Availability Check for Materials, PRTs and Capacities'.
Procedure
A check control must be maintained for this combination of order type and plant.
Best regards,
Lance

Hello,
Go to SPRO --> Plant Maintenance & CS --> Maintenance and Service Processing --> Maintenance and Service Orders --> Assign order types to maintenance plants.
Maintain the order type SM03 against the plant.
Go to SPRO --> Plant Maintenance & CS --> Maintenance and Service Processing --> Maintenance and Service Orders --> Completion confirmations --> Define the parameters for completion confirmations.
These both should be done, try to raise the SM03 order now.
PRase

Service PO Commitment with refrence to stasticall Internal Order is not get

PO is created with Account assigned to Internal Order stastically and Cost center as real cost object. Wih PO creation we check commitment in system
According to standard SAP, at creation of PO, system creates commitment & while doing GR/IR, system should reduce PO commitment and increase actual by that amount. Service PO is created for amount 239200 USD with Account Assigned Category K, Item category D, Account assigned to Cost Center & Statistical Orders (9 orders by approximate 11% ) So, initially there is commitment of 26000 USD on each service order. However from March 2009 onward business has done GR and IR for this PO approximate 50000 USD but nor commitment have reduced neither any commitment line item were posted in system.
As a result of it, business actual budget is fully consumed by (Commitment + Actual) and while doing IR budget deficient errors is received.
Here main problem is, non reduction of Service PO commitment while doing GR and IR.
Tried below approch so far.
CoAr / Order type Comitment acitive, Costcenter updates commitment and GL is valid on delivery date. Service PO order unit is JOB and commitment reduction is based on value match with PO details.
In order to test really probelm is with Commitment updation or reporting. I checked COOI and COSP with reference to object no.
but there is only one posting in line item of original PO amount and at total level there are two posting one is origiona one and seocind is with zero amount. but in both total line item for one of the peiod quantity is incomplete even after clicking Final Invoice.
Even after final Invoice ticked thre is not commitment line item gets posted in system. Even I run RKANBU01 program.
This is quite strange, if some one can give me other suggestion to proceed further.
With Regards
Nitin P.

This issue got resolved with OSS. There is technical glitch when you upgrade to EH4.0 and use valuated GR with multiple account assignment. Below is list of notes required to be apply in sequence. (1492317,
1491430, 1505733 & 1484993)
With Regards
Nitin P.

Issue services with different Internal Orders within a Plant from one PO?

Hiii... Please advice me of issuing services through one purchase order (one vendor comes and do the service to different machines of different internal orders in a plant) to different internal orders within a plant.
Thanks
Manoj

what is the problem? you can have Multiple Line Items in a PO (one for each internal Order).
And within one Line item you can add multiple service lines.

Internal order service maintenance WIP/COS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for