Internationalize the backend messages

Hi,
My applications open a popup with backend error message. the message is appearing in english.
I can able to localize the labels and all into the respective language.but not the application message pop-ups.
Please help me to solve this.
Regards,
Nagaraju

Hi Rizwan,
You can find log files in below BODS installed dirve.
C:\Program Files (x86)\SAP BusinessObjects\Data Services\log
Please try below link.
http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/EIM/Loading+log+files+%28Error%2C+Trace%2C+Monitor%29+into+a+table
Thanks & Regards,
Balamurugan G

Similar Messages

  • Error while reading the PO in the Backend system. Inform system admin

    Hi All,
    We are having a peculiar issue of 'Error while reading the PO in the Backend system. Inform system admin'.
    The P.O is in ordered status in SRM but the same is not getting transferred to backend ECC system.
    No error messages or logs in RZ20, SLG1 any where.
    All programmes like BBP_GET_STATUS_2 and CLEAN_REQREQ_UP are running fine.
    Tried pushing the P.Os manually using function module (BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC_V2) to backend ECC.
    It was working fine till a week ago and suddenly this problem is coming.
    We had implemented few OSS notes suggested by SAP for the issue of 'shopping carts appearing in sourcing cockpit even after P.O creation' in both development and test system.
    Now this issue is coming up in test system where as development system is working fine.
    Please let us know where to look and how to resolve this issue.
    A quick response would be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Teja

    I am facing the same issue with one PO in the Production system.
    SRM 5.0 , R/3 4.6C Extended classic scenario.
    I checked the status of other PO's created today. I see them in R/3. There is one PO which was created a week back which shows up as "ordered" in SRM but the PO is missing in R/3. When clicked on the details on the web, system throws the error
    Error while reading the PO in the Backend system. Inform system admin.
    Message no. BBP_CF010
    I checked RZ20, SLG1 no errors were found. I checked RFC connection, it was working fine too.
    I tried pushing the PO using the FM BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC, it did not solve the problem.
    In SRM WEBGUI Process PO - Item data -->follow on documents --> PO status is shown as Archived.
    Any inputs would be greatly appreciated. Please throw some light on this issue.
    Krishna

  • DISPLAY/PRINT MY EXPENSE REPORTS UNDER TERA FAILS WITH THE ERROR MESSAGE

    Hi Techies,
    When i click on "Display/print" button under my expense report ( Employee --> Travel & expenses --> Manage Expenses (TERA) --> My trip reports), it opens up a new window with the error message "SOAP Framework error: SOAP Runtime Exception: CSoapExceptionTransport : HTTP send failed with exception communication_failure(100,101)."
    This behaviour is noticed in the new upgraded system NW 701 SP7 (portal) and backend ECC 6.0 EHP4; However it works perfectly fine with our non-upgraded system NW 70 SP10 (portal) and backend ECC 6.0.
    When i ran the trace on this functionality, i could notice that in the non-upgraded system, after pulling all the values, it calls the RFC function module "PTRM_WEB_FORM_HTML_GET"; however the upgraded system calls "PTRM_WEB_FORM_PDF_GET".
    For the "PTRM_WEB_FORM_PDF_GET", I believe we need to configure the "ADS" rfc pointing to the ADS service on a j2ee server which am not planning for.
    MY QUESTION IS:-
    IS THERE ANY OPTION TO CHANGE THE FORM BEING CALLED FROM "PTRM_WEB_FORM_PDF_GET" TO "PTRM_WEB_FORM_HTML_GET" WHICH I BELIEVE WILL RESOLVE THE PROBLEM AM FACING?
    Kindly assist with your thoughts!1
    -GK

    Read the steps on note 1032311 on how to achieve it,
    In Web Dynpro, the Parameter for Formula is Defaulted to PDF file. If
    you don't want to use the ADOBE Form in ESS, you have to follow 2 steps:
    Solution
        o  Check the Homepage framework configuration.
      In IMG (transaction SIMGH) go in Travel Management->Employee Self
    Service->Homepages Framework->Ressources
    Delete the URL parameter "sap.xss.tra.UsePdf=true" of the ressource
    "EMPLOYEE_TRAVEL_TRIPFORM_SRV05".
      Check that the field URL for PCD file is filled with
    ROLES://portal_content/com.sap.pct/every_user/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.bp_fol
    der/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.roles/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.employee_self_service/
    com.sap.pct.erp.ess.employee_self_service/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.area_trave
    l_expenses/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.tripform
      Normally if it is not filled in your client, the system should use the
    one from client 000, that is the SAP delivered customizing.
        o  Check the Portal PCD configuration
      Logon on to your SAP portal as Administrator.
      In the Content Administration - Portal content, select Content
    provided by SAP->end User Content->Employee Self Service->iViews->Travel
    and Expenses->Display Trip Form
      Right Click on Display Trip Form and Select Object->Open
      In the field Application Parameters, you will find a parameter
                                                                     Page 2
    sap.xss.tra.UsePdf=true . Delete this line completely.
    When this configuration is done, the PDF form is desactivated and the
    HTML form is used.
    This is the issue with ADOBE set up
    Firstly, I would ask you to check the customizing steps from 944221
    to ensure no issue with the ADS configuration for the pdf form.
    to review OSS note 925741 as there can be a issue with the
    platform validity and version.

  • The error message: SE 337 Please enter a line number.

    Dear Experts,
    We have a PO that can not be transferred to P1 because of the error message:
    SE 337 Please enter a line number.
    We tried to checked the transfer of the PO.
    The error message came from the Backend Function BBP_PO_INBOUND.
    But it is not possible to define the exact cause of the issue (the exact transfer parameter) due to missing RFC authorization.
    The following changes were made in the PO (PO already mapped in Backend) after that PO cannot be transferred:
    - a deleted item was set back
    - WBS Element was changed
    Thank you in advance.
    Best regards
    Evgeny

    Hello Evgeny,
    Whenever you create a  PO in SRM irrespective of number of the
    line items chosen, in the backend system this PO will contain
    a single line item in the Item section.
    If you delete all the line items in the PO and
    attempt to undelete them the undeletion will not work since the PO is already
    considered to be deleted in the backend.
    Please try delete and undelete a individual line item
    in a PO provided there is at least one item which is not deleted.
    hope this helps
    Daniel

  • PO not getting created in the backend

    Hi
    I have made settings for R/3 PO to be created once a SC is approved, but I get the following errors in the "Application monitors>Shopping cart> backend application errors"
    000Creation of PO using Enjoy BAPIunsuccessful
    MEPO 085Check item number 0 in tabl
    06 010Document contains no items
    MEPO 071Item 00010 does not exist
    Note: PR and reservations in R/3 are getting created as follow on docs for SC but onky PO creation is throwing these errors. PO is getting created if i manually try and create it in R/3, so i suppose theres nothing wrong with the data as well.
    Regards,
    Amol

    Hi Sailatha,
    I am new to this so can u pls tell me, how to check and rectify it step by step. Which are the transactions used and how to do the assignment.
    Also what are the default message types to me maintained in the ALE customization. Currently i have the following messages maintained:
    ACC_GOODS_MOVEMENT
    ACLPAY
    BBPCO
    BBPIV
    MBGMCR
    Thanks & Regards,
    Amol

  • Dynamic type conflict during the assignment of references. - Error while generating proxy in the backend

    Hi All,
    I get a short dump while generating a proxy in the backend.I give the package and the prefix and end up with a short dump.
    Does any one know why this mught come up
    "Dynamic type conflict during the assignment of references."
    background: I imported a WSDl provided by legacy into PI and created service interfaces and then trying to generate a proxy class while i get this error.
    Thanks.

    Hi Shyamsundar,
    I will explain a problem that I usually see in some developments:
    XSD originally:                                  XSD transformed:
    Root                                                     -> Root
    Tag 1 type int                                    -> Tag 1 type int
    Tag2 type string                               -> Tag2 type string
    Tag3 type  any                                  - Tag3 type  string
    Normally the tag3 should have a XML inside. Then the ABAPers have to construct the tag3 with  a CDATA structure (CDATA is used to put in an XML tag more XML tags inside like a text and no to be interpreted).
    Later in SAP PI you can extract the cdata with an XSL, you can find some examples in the SCN.
    I don’t like to convert the whole XML in only one string tag, because this makes difficult the develop for the ABAPers, although the work inside the PI is very easy because with an XSL you can extract the whole message easily. (You can find some examples in the SCN)
    Regards.

  • Goods Receipt not transferred to the Backend System R/3

    We are currently using BBPCRM4.0 & SAP R/3 4.7 (extended scenario)
    For a particular Purchase Order which has a material number, We cannot transfer GR to the Backend System R/3 successfully.(The shopping cart of unsuccessfully transferred GR is created by using material)
    When I check R/3 using WE05, I can find the message "The plant data of the material G09002202 is locked by the user MRP_RFC". This must be the reason why GR is not transferred successfully to the Backend System, but I do not know what this message mean.(As you see, MRP_RFC is the user name that connects SRM and R/3. + That moment the material is not locked by any user in R/3)
    If we try to create the GR document again in SRM, the message "Item is already being processed" is shown, so cannot make BUS2203 Docs.
    To sort out this, we remove the GR Transfer Error Information in
    BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB.
    After removing the information of this error in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB, surprisingly we can make GR successfully.
    Weird!.
    Only for a particular PO which has a material, but not everytime.
    Sometimes this problem happens.
    At the first time, it doesn't work, but after removing the data from BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB, when we try GR again it works.
    Could you help me why this symptom happends..?
    Edited by: Hyangsook Moon on Feb 28, 2008 6:44 AM

    Hi Hyangsook Moon,
    The system is allowing  you to create Confirmation again in SRM because the status is not yet updated in SRM since the G.R is not created in the backend successfully.
    Since the confirmation is created in SRM and could not able to create G.R in R/3 through IDOC the system is giving you message as " Document is being processed".
    So the system is allowing you to create confirmation again once you delete the table entry.
    Hope this makes you more clear.Clarifications are welcome.
    Award points for helpful answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Changes on equipment are not saved at the backend (MAM30_031)

    Hi,
    if I change some equipment data e.g. street and city on the client, this changes are not done at the equipment in the backend. Status of MAM30_031 is I-Finished which holds the correct changed data inside. But if I now look into the equipment at the backend, there's still the old data. Changes done at the backend are synchronized fine to the client, but not the other way.
    Any idea why this doesn't work?
    Thank you and regards,
    Florian

    Hi Florian,
    here is what I would do:
    1. Check in "O-Sent" in a sequence which is a response for the change in equipment what is the status of your change. There should be something like, "All top updated successfully...", or "Conflict...", or "BAPI return...". That will give you and idea what happens with your change.
    2. If you "Successful"... message or no message - that is garanteed BAPI problem. You should open OSS message to SAP (component XAP-MBA-MAM).
    Which version of MAM3.0 SR3 you are running? There is Patch02 which I know for sure has some fixes for technical object change fucntionality. (If you are on the lower version: reintsallation will be required, there are SynBo changes either in Patch01, or Patch02, don't remember exactly which).
    Cheers,
    Larissa Limarova

  • PO is created in the Backend Instead of PR - Classic Secnario - SRM 5.0

    SRM experts,
    My client has upgraded to SRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0 from SRM 3.0 and 4.6c version respectively. SRM is using classic scenario, so Shopping cart is created in SRM and Purchase Requisition and Purchase Orders are created in the backend system. In the Sources of supply tab, we will see the Vendor, Outline agreement and other information based on the Plant, Product category and Purchasing group we select in the shopping cart. If user selects the vendor with outline agreement in the sources of supply tab then Shopping cart will create Purchase order instead of Purchase requisition in the backend system.  I am new at this client’s site and client does not have any documentation about how these has been configure in the system. Can someone please help me to find out where the settings might have been made in the system to create Purchase order instead of Purchase requisition if shopping cart contains vendor with outline agreement. I am asking this question because we have another enhancement request with similar requirement but with different condition.
    I will reward the points for helpful answers.
    Thank you experts.
    MP

    Hi,
    Could you checkthe foll cust link in SPRO:
    Define Objects in Backend System (Purch. Reqs, Reservations, Purch. Orders).
    PO is created if you set the "*" for EITHER the purchasing group OR the product category.
    SRM is creating PR or PO depending on:
    - SRM customizing (ex: always external proc + PR if incomplete, PO if complete)
    - the interpretation of SC data by R/3.
    IF your SC is considered complete by SRM (but with a fixed vendor and not a preferred vendor) the system will check if it can create a PO in R/3.
    For this, each item will request a META_INTERPRETE_DATA to R/3, asking if it can create a PO. If R/3 considers this data as incomplete, it will reply to create a PR.
    Usual cases of R/3 PR creation instead of PO:
    - prefered vendor in SRM (and not a fixed one)
    - custom checks in user exits in R/3
    - error messages in R/3 (ex: O6 334 In the case of a fixed vendor, please enter info record)
    To debug without debuging into R/3, you can also try the following:
    - use BADI DETERMINE_TARGET_OBJECT and force PO creation
    - so the system will always try to create a PO
    - R/3 won't create the PO (for the same reason as in META_INTERPRETE_DATA), and will raise an error in SRM
    - finally you get the real error in application monitor (SC --> backend application errors
    Related thread:
    Re: PO not create from SC with source of supply in classic sena
    BR,
    Disha.
    <b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

  • "No response from the backend application". Oracle DB

    Hi everybody,
    I have a problem with a connection to a Oracle DB. Here are the steps:
    1. I created a system in my portal to call a Oracle DB with the SAP template com.sap.portal.systems.jdbc.jdbc_system
    2. I filled the parameters and the conection test is ok.
    3. I created an iView based on com.sap.portal.applications.enterprise.iviews.Database_JDBC_iView
    4. This iView use the system I created before and is sending a simple query.
    The result is the message:
    "No response from the backend application"
    I have been reading the page
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/29/acd8403e37762ae10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    in Help.sap and i supose that my case could be 1.2 because I have mapped an user (case 1.1) and my DB is up and connection is ok (case 1.3), but...what have i to recheck in my configuration to remedy the situation??
    Thanks all.
    Guillermo.

    Hi Ramesh,
    Yes I am using the driver class but in the connection URL I wrote jdbc:sap:oracle://183.145.5.10:1527;sid=HEX
    And here my question is, have I to put user and password of the administrator of the DB in this parameter? I dind't put because I mapped later in user management.
    And the connection tests is successful.
    Thanks for the awnser.
    Guillermo.

  • PO not created in the backend for SC

    Hi,
    I am using SRM 5.0 and i created a shopping cart.. The shopping cart is ordered sccessflly but a PO is not created in the backend system.
    I have made the follwing setting.
    The backend system definition seems fine.
    I have also defined the prodct category and the target system.
    Number ranges are assigned in the SRM system.
    I checked rz20 and did not find any errors there..
    Shold i created a docment type EC in the backend MM system??
    What else could i be missing. Please advise.

    Hi,
    You could check the return of FM B31I_INTERPRETE_DATA, which is called when a follow-on document is created in backend system.
    Try to debug the shopping cart transfer, as specified in note 1173815. Perhaps the backend return message can be helpful.
    Kind regards,
    Ricardo

  • Some POs are not generated in the backend system

    Hi,
    we've implemented SAP SRM 5.5. in a Classic Extended Scenario with SAP R/3 as the backend system.
    Recently we are facing a problem related to some Purchase Orders. If they have some wrong information for the backend system, they do not get the "Error in process" status but the are put in the "Ordered" status even though they are not replicated in SAP R/3.
    This problems occurs only with some POs and only (for as much as we could see) if the PO has been generated from an Offer (S.C.->Bid Invitation->Offer->PO).
    Could you please help me out with this issue? I can't understand why this is happening...
    Thanks a lot for your precious advices!
    Giovanni

    Hi Sanjeev,
    thanks for your quick reply. I've checked the RZ20 and there's an error message related to the Header Data. I've checked also the PO from BBP_PD and I could see that in table BBP_PDIGP the EP subtype is missing. If I force it and then I transfer the PO again, everything is fine.
    I can't understand why this is happening. I've never had any problems like that with other POs created straight out of a S.C.. The issue is related only with POs created out of a Bid.
    Please, let me know if you have an idea.
    Have a nice day!
    Giovanni

  • Change  existing PO in the backend

    Hi SRM gurus,
       Scenario: I have to create  custom fields in shopping cart it will have the backend PO number, i need to check this field and add shopping  cart line items to the the the same PO.
             i can get the back end PO details by calling
    "BAPI_PO_GET_DETAILS1",but i could n't find any structure in SRM for this bapi.
    please help me out ,
    points will be rewarded .
    thankx,
    Radha
    Message was edited by: Radha

    Hi jaga,
        Lets us suppose PO(0000783) exist in r/3 for sc 1000089.
    now i am creating new sc(only 1 line item will bein sc) with the above po number .
    1.system should check whether the  po exists in the backend system....if not ...throw error mesage.(if entered)
    2.if yes,after approval and before creating backend document,system should update(change) the existing po(0000783) comparing with  new sc .
    it shouldn't create new po for that sc(new)
    3. the new sc should be deleted.(can we delete sc after  approval?)....if no any other suggestion to achieve.
    4. updated (change ) made should be reflected in the history of sc(1000089).
    5. if po number is not given in the sc field...the system should follow the standard ..to create back end document.
    the above is the scenario...Please  help me to achieve this.
    Thanks,
    radha

  • Direct contract in the backend - Classic Scenery SRM 7.0

    Hi Masters, 
    I´m using SRM 7.0 Package 08 in the classic scenery. 
    I´m trying to create a direct contract of a QUOT acepted and that need to go to the backend. 
    I´m using two badis: 
    BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS 
    Where the variable CV_LOGSYS is with the system backend destiny 
    BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE 
    Where the variable IV_LOGICAL_SYSTEM is with the system backend destiny. 
    Where the variable CV_USER is with the user RFC. 
    The result is generating myself a message: " CONTRACT 4400000041 - WAS CREATED " (/SAPSRM/PDO_WKL455 BPP_PD455) 
    But that contract is not available in SRM and it is not also available in ECC. 
    I forgetting something? 
    Thank you, 
    Pedro Marques

    I believe that it exists yes possibility, as well as it comments on the text of the badi:
    Use
    With Business Add-In BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE, you can replace or supplement existing contract data in SAP Enterprise Buyer with your own backend structures and tables.
    Enterprise Buyer calls this BAdI before it makes the RFC to the backend system to create a contract.
    Activities
    Implement and activate the BAdI if you wish to create contracts in the backend system and replace or supplement contract data.
    Anybody have some idea?
    Thanks,
    Pedro

  • Error On Distribution Model in the Backend

    Hello,
    I'm customizing our SRM and Backend to work together.
    I'm in the part Distribution Model. It works on SRM but on my backend, when I want to "Generate Partner" I have a message "No messages have been defined for the selection conditions in the model" and nothing is done.
    I don't know why...
    I don't know if it is link but me RFC connexion that I created on SRM to link to the backend name for example ABC_020 and in the backend is one RFC is ABCMAND020. doesn't it matter if they don't have the same name?
    Thanks in advance.
    If someone has a cookbook or documentation about SRM can you please send me at "[email protected]"
    Thanks twice.

    Hi Eileen,
    We have observed that without local RFCs i.e.
    SRM to SRM
    R/3 to R/3
    the business objects (matl/services) don't get replicated as you can not configure the Middleware sites in SMOEAC.
    Don't know whether it will help for Distribution model but worth trying
    BR
    Dinesh
    <b>Reward if helps</b>

Maybe you are looking for

  • Songs greyed in iTunes and not playable on iPhone

    Hi, it seems I'm faced against an issue I'm not able to understand and fix. Yesterday I tried to play some songs in my iPhone Music library. Songs were there, album coversheet is fine, everything seems ok. But even if I click on start playing icon no

  • I need full screen video to automagically reduce back to the page when the video is done.

    Possible? I want to use the "Full-screen only" option in the media widget, but when the video reaches the end it drops to a black frame and just sits there.  I need it to realize the video is over and shrink back down to the widget in the page. Simil

  • Decode or Case when

    Can above be used inside Expression operator, I am getting error while validating. I am using owb 11g. "variable not declared" Thanks, Ravi

  • Location of preset files

    Users should be able to specify an alternative location for the various preset files such as the collections, custom file info panels, xmp metadata templates, keywords. Bridge should search the default location and the alternative subfolders. The mai

  • The Comparing RAW with TS Time Lapse Recording file for MSI PANOCAM

    I am a big fan of MSI, I have been using its motherboard, MP3 and NB. MSI introduces a new IOT product in 2015, MSI PANOCAM, I feel excited about it, therefore I wanna share some experience of MSI PANOCAM here. Have you heard Time-Lapse, it is very p