Intrastat report VE01 & VE33

Hi Experts,
I have a issue with intrastat report, In VE01 transaction credit memos (IG) are appearing . But when we are using VE33 transaction to take print, these credit memos (IG) are not appear .
please advice me how to get these credit memos (IG) in VE33 report.
Thnks in advance
Venakt

Hi,
Check if the enhancement FTGOVSEL is working.
I hope this helps you,
Regards,
Eduardo

Similar Messages

Steps in INTRASTAT Reporting

Dear Experts,
Can you please let me know the detailed steps to file Intrastat Reporting in Simple terms. I have gone thru the help available in SAP portal, I am looking at steps business to following to file the INTRASTAT in Manual way (not by Soft Copy / print out in SAP). We have the following Scenarios
1 Purchases for Direct / Indirect
2 Vendor Returns
3 Sub Contracting
Now after various business transactions, if I need to submit INTRASTAT to authorities then how to proceed
a) Run Report MEIS / VE01, and inturn it updates table VEIAV. Then how to proceed further?
b) What are are the Transactions need to be executed for updation of table VEIAV
c) What kind of cares to be taken in General
Thank you in advance
Chiru

Does this help?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/fr/fd/45c2649d6411d189b60000e829fbbd/content.htm

Intrastat reporting for STO

Hi All,
We have a plant abroad located in Hungary to which we despatch goods through STO from UK. Please let me know if we are supposed to report this transaction in the intrastat arrival for Hungary and despatch for UK. If yes, please let me know exactly at what point the same will reflect in the intrastat reporting. Will it get reflected immediately on STO posting and running the update through MEIS/VE01?
Regards
Suresh

Hi,
I suggest you the Note 1016386 - Intrastat for Romania. Althought it is for Romania, this note contains a document that explain the setttings in IMG, functional steps, etc...
In notes, if you search notes with the string 'INTRASTAT FRANCE' you have around 25 notes by legal changes. The differences in countries are formats of files, paper declarations, etc..
Each country call a report to do the 'document' (file or paper) In your case: RVEXDAIF and RVEXPAIF. Run it in SE38 and read the info.
If you need something else, let me know it.
I hope this helps you
Regards,
Eduardo

Error EI 250 when processing corrections in Intrastat report

We have just set up the German Intrastat report. We run VE01 and get the list of documents. Then we go to the incomplete section to correct invoices without the VAT number and when we click (on those outside of Germany or Ireland) we get an error EI 250 saying "for country of plant, no entry mainained in object of declaration to Authority control/completeness".
I cannot find any documentation on this error code. Has anyone else ever had this error before or know how to correct it?
Thanks!
Debbie

I still haven't found any documentation but what I did is end up creating an incompletion procedure for the countries of the plants we shipped from. Since it was for the German Intrastat, I copied the incompletion procedure for Germany so that it has all the correct data. This made the error go away.
I hope this helps someone else down the road!!!
Debbie

Intrastat report duplicating receipts for corrections

Hi,
The situation is that,GR (movt.type-101)was done and then a reversal (movt type-102)was done and again GR was done.Now in Intrastat report only GR is getting displayed but not the Reversal.I mean to say that there are two entries for GR but there is no entry for the reversal done.Can anybody help why the Reversal is not getting displayed.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Intrastat report executed in MEIS / VE01, and inturn it updates table *VEIAV. Please check whether the table VEIAV updates the GR reversal. Other reason can be in the dates. Check whether the GR reversal/cancellation posted in a new month or else verify whether you have entered the correct month of declaration etc. Thanking you.

INTRASTAT report for Belgium ( VE06/VE09)- No data found

Hi
I am executing VE06/VE09 ( Intrastat report for Belgium). I get a message saying that there is no data. I have made some sample data.
Can someone tell me....what have I missed? Is there any specific configuration that needs to be done?
Thanks in advance
Dasaradh

Hi Thank you very much.
VE01 also I have tried but that also says no data exist.
Would there be anything else that I am missing.
Thanks once again
Dasaradh

Credit/Debit memo in Intrastat Report

Dear Gurus
I am getting the VE01 Intrastat Report correctly for Sales Invoices. However When I create Credit/Debit note with reference to Sales Invoice it does not appear in VE01 report.
I believe it is because there is no material movement involved here. However in VEO1 Screen we have option of selecting Credit/ Debit memo, Cancellation Invoice.
How would then this documents will be reported then.
Regards,
Neeraj Srivastava

Dear Gurus
I am getting the VE01 Intrastat Report correctly for Sales Invoices. However When I create Credit/Debit note with reference to Sales Invoice it does not appear in VE01 report.
I believe it is because there is no material movement involved here. However in VEO1 Screen we have option of selecting Credit/ Debit memo, Cancellation Invoice.
How would then this documents will be reported then.
Regards,
Neeraj Srivastava

PO Creation of free goods for intrastat reporting

All,
Due to intrastat reporting restrictions, when we are creating a PO with a free good we need to mark the item as "Free Good" on the item overview, and set the "Business Transaction type" to 41 on the "Origin / Destination / Business" tab of the "Import" tab.
However, we also need to set the "Statistical value" on the "Decleration Values" tab but this field is greyed out.
The help message says:
The system determines statistical values on the basis of condition records with condition types GRWR and GWLB (subcontracting).
However it does not say where I can set this value. Does anyone know where I can set this value per material?
Many Thanks,
Colm

Can you explain why subcontracting is free of charge, I have never seen somebody doing some work without charging for it.
are you talking about the delivery of the materials sent to your subcontractor or the finished materials that you get back?
Usually the statistical value field can be maintained in VEFU. But I guess it interacts with the free of charge indicator in your case.
I just like to give you some explanation from the statistical office:
u201CProcessing under contractu201D covers operations (treatment/processing, mounting, assembly, enhancement,
renovation, etc.) resulting in the production of new or really improved goods on the basis of intermediate
materials provided free of charge by the commissioning party. Depending on whether processing under
contract is done within the country or abroad, the relevant terms used are u201Cinwardu201D and u201Coutwardu201D
processing under contract.
u201CProcessing under contractu201C in the context of intra-Community trade statistics covers intra-Community
cross-border movements of goods, provided the finished products produced on the basis of the
intermediate products provided through cross-border transactions will later leave the country of
manufacture (dispatch), being either returned to the original country of consignment (arrival; nature of
transaction u201C41u201C or u201C51u201C) or moved to another country (nature of transaction u201C42u201D or u201C52u201C).
What must be declared is both the cross-border movement of the (free) intermediate materials and the
subsequent (cross-border) return of the finished products.
(Note: Processing performed by the processor on own account is not processing under contract but is
generally covered as purchase/sale (nature of transaction u201C11u201D.)
For the declaration of the intermediate products provided free of charge (nature of transaction u201C41u201D), a
statistical value has to be indicated that corresponds to a selling price customary in the market (free
German border); in case of doubt a careful estimate should be used. When declaring the finished products
(nature of transaction u201C51u201D), the invoiced amount to be indicated is the costs of wage, material, transport
and insurance as invoiced by the contractor; for the statistical value, the statistical value of the
intermediate materials (provided free of charge) must be included, too.
(Note: Intermediate products returned to the commissioning party without treatment should be declared
under nature of transaction u201C51u201D, entering the value originally indicated.)
If, however, the commissioning party provides only parts that are insignificant in terms of function or value
(e.g. labels, screws, etc.), then there is no processing under contract. In those cases, such provision of
materials that is negligible in statistical terms is exempted from declaration for intra-Community trade
statistics. For the finished product supplied on a cross-border basis, a sale or purchase (nature of
transaction u201C11u201D) is regularly assumed, with the value of the materials provided free of charge by the
commissioning party exceptionally not being included when determining the value of the finished
products.
Also, there is no processing under contract if the contract work performed at the goods provided consists
of just simple activities (e.g. simple packaging, ironing, etc.). In such cases the goods exported or
imported temporarily within that scope are not covered statistically.
Examples:
1. A sports car is moved temporarily from Italy to Germany for tuning activities (e.g. power increase,
car body modifications). What is invoiced in addition to the labour costs is some car parts
purchased by the domestic contractor.
As the sports car is u201Creally improvedu201D by the work performed, this is u201Cprocessing under contractu201D,
which has to be declared under nature of transaction u201C41u201D for arrival and u201C51u201D for (re)dispatch.
2. For the production of a car in the Czech Republic, the engine gearbox unit and some other parts are
provided free of charge by the commissioning party located in Germany. For the import of the
complete car to Germany, the foreign producer invoices the car without the value of the engine
gearbox unit.
This is u201Cprocessingu201D of important components (both in terms of value and function) in connection
with the production of a u201Cnew goodu201D (car), i.e. the transaction u2013 by definition u2013 must be declared as
u201Cprocessing under contractu201D both for dispatch and for re-arrival.
3. For the production of an off-road vehicle produced in Austria, the German commissioning party
provides the company emblem free of charge. When the complete vehicle is imported to Germany,
the foreign producer of the off-road vehicle invoices the vehicle without the value of the company
emblem mounted on the vehicle.
Although the components provided are u201Cprocessedu201D, they are insignificant parts (company
emblem) both in terms of function and value, so that this is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D but a
purchase (nature of transaction u201C11u201D) of a vehicle.
4. An older car is temporarily moved to Poland to restore the paint (washing, polishing and
conserving).
This is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D in the context of intra-Community trade statistics because
the work performed consists of just simple activities. As this is u201Ctemporary useu201D, the cross-border
movement of the vehicle is exempted from declaration.

Intrastat reporting

Hi,
We have a issue in intrastat reporting for GB.
we have 1 PO for which we did the following
1. GR in month of July , 101 movement
2. reversal in month of sep ; 101 Movement
3. GR in month of Sep ; 101 movement
4. Invoice posted in month of Sep .
Now when we run the intrastat report(VX99) for the PO we see the following .
1. There is entry in period 08/2011 for the value as per the GR in july.
2. when the report is run for 09/2011 we find one more entry as per the invoice posted in Sep.
Kindly advice if any one is aware of such a issue .
As per my understanding there should have been only the entrry for 09/2011 as per the invoice in sep.
Kindly correct me if my understanding is worng.
Thanks & Regards
R.M.

Ruchir Mishra wrote:
Hi,
>
> We have a issue in intrastat reporting for GB.
>
> we have 1 PO for which we did the following
> 1. GR in month of July , 101 movement
> 2. reversal in month of sep ; 101 Movement
> 3. GR in month of Sep ; 101 movement
> 4. Invoice posted in month of Sep .
>
> Now when we run the intrastat report(VX99) for the PO we see the following .
>
> 1. There is entry in period 08/2011 for the value as per the GR in july.
>
> 2. when the report is run for 09/2011 we find one more entry as per the invoice posted in Sep.
>
> Kindly advice if any one is aware of such a issue .
> As per my understanding there should have been only the entrry for 09/2011 as per the invoice in sep.
I have some doubts and comments
How is it possible that you reverse a movement of July in September?
SAP allows only posting in current and previous period. Hence you cannot have reversed the a JULY receipt in September.
You get an Intrastat entry for August, because you had no invoice in July and no invoice in August, but you have to report a movement latest a month after its occurance. If the invoice is not present then this movement is reported with the PO value.
You wrote you reversed it in September with 101 (usually you reverse with 102 movement), can this be the root cause to have it twice in the September report?
Before you execute Intrastat technically in SAP, you should already know about the procedure outlined by your government.
Usually cancellations/corrections have to be reported manually in a special form.
see the general guide in
https://www.uktradeinfo.com/index.cfm?task=noticesixty

Intrastat report in drop-ship process

Hi,
I have drop-ship scenario where plant country belongs to France ( FR) but actual shipment happens from Taiwan(TW).
Butin the sale order we use plant as France(FR) and shipping point as Taiwan(TW).Since these are drop ships dispatched from non EU countries i.e in my case Taiwan(TW), the intrastat report ignores it. i.e on the invoice document in the "Trade/Custom" tab both "Country of origin" and "Dispatch country" will show as France and the same is picked in Intrastat reporting.
But this is wrong since actual shipment has been done from Taiwan country . Therefore how can we change this to Taiwan i.e correct country. One way is change in the user exit of billing.
but is there any other way, i mean process wise ?. If we do third order sales process would this resolve problem. if so how can this be achieved.
What i have noticed is even in third party sales process it has the same problem.
Thankyou in advance

Thankyou for your reply.
even if i use Foreign Trade concept , but my plant in sales order is "France" and shipping point as "Taiwan", then the problem is instrastat will ignore Taiwan as a departure country , it shows only France as departure country , but it should be Taiwan. Therefore how can we resove this problem.
I dont want to change dispatch country as "Taiwan" using user-exit in invoice-> "customs/Trade" tab , because if i change this field then instrastat report will pick-up . But withoug user-exit how can we change via config or process wise.
Thanks in advance

Intrastat report Spain. Credit memos posted not appearing in report

Hi
I have a issue where the debit notes raised to vendor are not appearing in Intrastat declaration.
How this debit and credit notes must be taken by Intrastat ? This problem is there since the Intrastat report is being used.
Is there any specific configuration for this or
is there any period check because of which the debit notes are not picked?
The reason is po was created in Feb 2009 and continuous GR and invoice postings happened in subsequent months which are all captured in Intrastat report. A debit note was raised in Sep 2009 which does not appear in the report.
Request your expertise and help to resolve this issue.
Thank you

credit memos are not supported in SAP as you can read in docu:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo2005ao/helpdata/en/F3/4392579F5DC24E9FBE2FA84E9E7660/frameset.htm
Please read the local Intrastat guide, in many countries it just says that you have to file a correction per paper form to your statiscal office.
SAP explains this as well in OSS note 374682:
If a credit memo refers to a billing document which was already declared to authorities, proceed as follows:Here, you should create a written correction to the statistical office.Specify a data record to which the credit memo refers.
Check the documents of the statistical offices for information on when you have to declare the credit memo (limits for values and quantities).*********************************************************************

Intrastat report generation

Hi Experts,
I am facing a problem with VX99 T code .this T code is related "Foreign trade: Cockpit" where we are supposed to generate the INTRASTAT report for the data arrivals (purchase orders) in FRANCE. as of now in the intrastat reporting the data (purchase orders history ) which is related to 122 (EKBE-VGABE = '1' and EKBE-SHKZG = 'H') movement type is getting deleted by the sap standard functionality. the code is available in the the program (RMIMSELS) at line no 7522. but the requirement is what ever the data which is related to 122 movement type should be included in the INTRASTAT reporting for franse.
if it is possible please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks and regards
Mohan

It is not possible in standard, check for any notes
Regards
Chandrasekhar

San Marino to be included for Italy Intrastat reporting

Hello All,
We have to include San Marino in EU Country Members for Italy Intrastat Reporting.
San Marino should be visible in folder "INtrastat" under folder "EU Countries" after executiing transaction "ENGR".
TX "ENGR" > PERIODIC DECLARATION.
we have already maintained SM (San marino) as a EU country in table T005.
Regards,
Ajit

Ajit
Did you try setting up SM in T Code VEB2- Special Rule Country / Region
Generally check your Foreign Trade (FT) settings, especally here:
SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Foreign Trade/Customs/Periodic Declarations/Control Data
and
SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Foreign Trade/Customs/Legal Control/Foreign Trade Data by Country of Destination
Also there are several OSS notes if you search by keyword 'San Marino'. Check them out.

Statistical Value in MEIS for INTRASTAT reporting

Hello,
From reveiwing related posts I understand that the statistical value on the INTRASTAT report comes from a system default exchange rate that uses the average exchange rate from the border crossing rate (GRWR condition on the PO) and the exchange rate on the invoice.
What is the exact calculation that is being used to determine the statistical value on the MEIS report?
Thanks,

Thanks very much for the link.
We do have the GRWR conditions set up, and the statistical value is populating correctly on the PO.
The issue I'm having is that I can't properly explain how the reported statistical value (VEIAV- GRENZEWEAK) is calculated.
For example:
VEIAV - GRENZWEAK is 5,405.86 SEK
GRWR on PO 572.03 EUR 5,299.22 SEK (Ex rate: 9.26389)Goods Receipt 504.79 EUR 4,681.78 SEK (Ex rate: 9.27470)
Freight 40.00 EUR 370.99 SEK (Ex rate: 9.27470)Invoice 503.00 EUR 4,770.43 SEK (Ex rate: 9.48395)
Do you know how SAP arrives at 5,405.86 SEK with these inputs?
Thanks,

Periodic Declarations Intrastat reporting.

Periodic Declarations Intrastat reporting. -
The purchase order beeing reported har the following information:
Country of origin (EIPO-HERKL) has the value country DK
Country of destination (RL50E-HLAND) has the value country SE
When running the intrastat report the fields for the above mentioned give the wrong value for country of destination
Country of origin field URSPRSLND gives the value DK (correct)
Country of destination BESTILAND gives the value DK (wrong)
It looks wright when you see it in SAP but it is wrong when it is send via EDICOM to the receiver in SCB.se.
Has anybody had simular problems sending the periodic report of intrastat.

I assume you do Intrastat for country SE.
Is your PO a standard PO or a third party PO?
In a standard PO the Country of destination is not changable and should default from the receiving plant.
You may check the Intrastat record in transaction VEFU if the destination country is wrong in the record, too.
If you see this wrong destination country just in the list, then see OSS note 393569 - Intrastat:List output-Country of destinatn instd of dispatch

Intrastat report VE01 & VE33

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for