Intrastat

The customer must provide a Universal Cards Intrastat message and here is to come to a problem.
There are a supplier to the customer with an office in Switzerland and one in France. Switzerland is not part of the EU, the documents of the supplies from Switzerland but still appear on the Intrastat-reporting together with the supporting evidence for the supplies from France.
It is not an option to create an additional extra GP master records for deliveries from Switzerland.
Thanks,
Wolfgang

Hi Wolfgang,
if I understand your issue correctly there are business partners which should be excluded from the Intrastat declaration automatically. Manual option is to exclude document lines in step 6of7 of Intrastat wizard (in 2007A version via field "Delete Indicator"). What version of SAP Business One do you use?
We are considering to add a new option to Business Partner Intrastat settings "Business Partner not relevant for Intrastat". It shall act as the decision point whether the Business Partner will or not be available in the Intrastat declaration (if the whole document meets the period criteria). What do you think? Could the new setting cover the mentioned business case above?
Best Regards,
Martin Slavik
SAP Business One Solution Manager

Similar Messages

PO Creation of free goods for intrastat reporting

All,
Due to intrastat reporting restrictions, when we are creating a PO with a free good we need to mark the item as "Free Good" on the item overview, and set the "Business Transaction type" to 41 on the "Origin / Destination / Business" tab of the "Import" tab.
However, we also need to set the "Statistical value" on the "Decleration Values" tab but this field is greyed out.
The help message says:
The system determines statistical values on the basis of condition records with condition types GRWR and GWLB (subcontracting).
However it does not say where I can set this value. Does anyone know where I can set this value per material?
Many Thanks,
Colm

Can you explain why subcontracting is free of charge, I have never seen somebody doing some work without charging for it.
are you talking about the delivery of the materials sent to your subcontractor or the finished materials that you get back?
Usually the statistical value field can be maintained in VEFU. But I guess it interacts with the free of charge indicator in your case.
I just like to give you some explanation from the statistical office:
u201CProcessing under contractu201D covers operations (treatment/processing, mounting, assembly, enhancement,
renovation, etc.) resulting in the production of new or really improved goods on the basis of intermediate
materials provided free of charge by the commissioning party. Depending on whether processing under
contract is done within the country or abroad, the relevant terms used are u201Cinwardu201D and u201Coutwardu201D
processing under contract.
u201CProcessing under contractu201C in the context of intra-Community trade statistics covers intra-Community
cross-border movements of goods, provided the finished products produced on the basis of the
intermediate products provided through cross-border transactions will later leave the country of
manufacture (dispatch), being either returned to the original country of consignment (arrival; nature of
transaction u201C41u201C or u201C51u201C) or moved to another country (nature of transaction u201C42u201D or u201C52u201C).
What must be declared is both the cross-border movement of the (free) intermediate materials and the
subsequent (cross-border) return of the finished products.
(Note: Processing performed by the processor on own account is not processing under contract but is
generally covered as purchase/sale (nature of transaction u201C11u201D.)
For the declaration of the intermediate products provided free of charge (nature of transaction u201C41u201D), a
statistical value has to be indicated that corresponds to a selling price customary in the market (free
German border); in case of doubt a careful estimate should be used. When declaring the finished products
(nature of transaction u201C51u201D), the invoiced amount to be indicated is the costs of wage, material, transport
and insurance as invoiced by the contractor; for the statistical value, the statistical value of the
intermediate materials (provided free of charge) must be included, too.
(Note: Intermediate products returned to the commissioning party without treatment should be declared
under nature of transaction u201C51u201D, entering the value originally indicated.)
If, however, the commissioning party provides only parts that are insignificant in terms of function or value
(e.g. labels, screws, etc.), then there is no processing under contract. In those cases, such provision of
materials that is negligible in statistical terms is exempted from declaration for intra-Community trade
statistics. For the finished product supplied on a cross-border basis, a sale or purchase (nature of
transaction u201C11u201D) is regularly assumed, with the value of the materials provided free of charge by the
commissioning party exceptionally not being included when determining the value of the finished
products.
Also, there is no processing under contract if the contract work performed at the goods provided consists
of just simple activities (e.g. simple packaging, ironing, etc.). In such cases the goods exported or
imported temporarily within that scope are not covered statistically.
Examples:
1. A sports car is moved temporarily from Italy to Germany for tuning activities (e.g. power increase,
car body modifications). What is invoiced in addition to the labour costs is some car parts
purchased by the domestic contractor.
As the sports car is u201Creally improvedu201D by the work performed, this is u201Cprocessing under contractu201D,
which has to be declared under nature of transaction u201C41u201D for arrival and u201C51u201D for (re)dispatch.
2. For the production of a car in the Czech Republic, the engine gearbox unit and some other parts are
provided free of charge by the commissioning party located in Germany. For the import of the
complete car to Germany, the foreign producer invoices the car without the value of the engine
gearbox unit.
This is u201Cprocessingu201D of important components (both in terms of value and function) in connection
with the production of a u201Cnew goodu201D (car), i.e. the transaction u2013 by definition u2013 must be declared as
u201Cprocessing under contractu201D both for dispatch and for re-arrival.
3. For the production of an off-road vehicle produced in Austria, the German commissioning party
provides the company emblem free of charge. When the complete vehicle is imported to Germany,
the foreign producer of the off-road vehicle invoices the vehicle without the value of the company
emblem mounted on the vehicle.
Although the components provided are u201Cprocessedu201D, they are insignificant parts (company
emblem) both in terms of function and value, so that this is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D but a
purchase (nature of transaction u201C11u201D) of a vehicle.
4. An older car is temporarily moved to Poland to restore the paint (washing, polishing and
conserving).
This is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D in the context of intra-Community trade statistics because
the work performed consists of just simple activities. As this is u201Ctemporary useu201D, the cross-border
movement of the vehicle is exempted from declaration.

Intrastat reporting

Hi,
We have a issue in intrastat reporting for GB.
we have 1 PO for which we did the following
1. GR in month of July , 101 movement
2. reversal in month of sep ; 101 Movement
3. GR in month of Sep ; 101 movement
4. Invoice posted in month of Sep .
Now when we run the intrastat report(VX99) for the PO we see the following .
1. There is entry in period 08/2011 for the value as per the GR in july.
2. when the report is run for 09/2011 we find one more entry as per the invoice posted in Sep.
Kindly advice if any one is aware of such a issue .
As per my understanding there should have been only the entrry for 09/2011 as per the invoice in sep.
Kindly correct me if my understanding is worng.
Thanks & Regards
R.M.

Ruchir Mishra wrote:
Hi,
>
> We have a issue in intrastat reporting for GB.
>
> we have 1 PO for which we did the following
> 1. GR in month of July , 101 movement
> 2. reversal in month of sep ; 101 Movement
> 3. GR in month of Sep ; 101 movement
> 4. Invoice posted in month of Sep .
>
> Now when we run the intrastat report(VX99) for the PO we see the following .
>
> 1. There is entry in period 08/2011 for the value as per the GR in july.
>
> 2. when the report is run for 09/2011 we find one more entry as per the invoice posted in Sep.
>
> Kindly advice if any one is aware of such a issue .
> As per my understanding there should have been only the entrry for 09/2011 as per the invoice in sep.
I have some doubts and comments
How is it possible that you reverse a movement of July in September?
SAP allows only posting in current and previous period. Hence you cannot have reversed the a JULY receipt in September.
You get an Intrastat entry for August, because you had no invoice in July and no invoice in August, but you have to report a movement latest a month after its occurance. If the invoice is not present then this movement is reported with the PO value.
You wrote you reversed it in September with 101 (usually you reverse with 102 movement), can this be the root cause to have it twice in the September report?
Before you execute Intrastat technically in SAP, you should already know about the procedure outlined by your government.
Usually cancellations/corrections have to be reported manually in a special form.
see the general guide in
https://www.uktradeinfo.com/index.cfm?task=noticesixty

Intrastat - Inbound/Outbound of non valuated materials used in production.

Hello everyone,
I've found several threads and very useful posts (ex: Re: PO Creation of free goods for intrastat reporting) regarding similar issue, but the solution proposed was manual input, therefore not answering totally to my client requirement.
I am actually performing maintenance activities and there is this new business process, I have been searching for the correct understandind of this process regarding intrastat here and I haven't found.
So i will describe the process hoping that someone can give me some hint:
Vendor A
Customer B
Raw Material R
Finish Product P
Service S
1. So we ( Vendor A ) receive raw material from our Customer B (+mov.type +)
2. We ( Vendor A ) with a production order process the Raw material R into Finish Product P.
3. We ( vendor A ) send the Finish Product P back to the Customer B.
4. We ( Vendor A ) then issue an invoice for the Service S to the Customer B.
5. It can occur that we Vendor A, can send back the Raw material R which was not manufactured back to Customer B (with a mov type.)
So thiswas the scenario and how the process is beeing done, and the client understanding is:
- As far as i understood, (please correct me if i am wrong) the Raw Material R must be declared (Quantity and statistic value) in Purchasing Intrastat, in the transactions where the Vendor A receives the raw material and as well in the case that they send it back to Customer B.
- Regarding the Invoice from the Vendor A to Customer B, the Raw Material R is incorporated in the Finish Product P, therefore I've been told that, the Statistic Value determined in the invoice in this situation has to include the cost value of the raw materials R.
My issues in MM are the following:
1 - If Raw Material R is non valuated, how can i maintain its statistic value to be declared, in inbound as well outbound? as an Info-record?
My issues in SD are the following:
1 - If the Statistic Value GRWR can be for example 102% calculated over the net value, and if the cost value of Raw Materials R are to be included, so i would have to add them somehow to the statistic value.
In this case the question comes up, where do i maintain the value of the raw materials R, and how to add it to the statistic value automatically ?
Regarding what is implemented in this client, they have SD intrastat running, but not MM intrastat was implemented.
Feedback would be highly appreciated!!
Thank you in advance.

Hi Sergio,
I have this exact same requirement but on a bigger scale.
The complexities are:
1. The raw material which client use, that can be either supplied by customer or can be procured by client. Remember, customer's raw material and my externally procured raw material is exactly same in all properties.
2. There are many customers who send same exact raw material.
Requirements:
1. Client wants to use same material codes (for raw materials and even for finished products) for normal production cycle and for Job work cycle. Master data needs to be the same, and data need to be separated at transaction level.
2. Whatever raw material client gets from customer, its statistical value should be entered at the time of goods receipt.
Please suggest if preference processing can handle this.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal

Fields for Intrastat in SRM 7.0 Purchase order

Hi experts,
we use SRM 7.0 extended scenario and the requirement is to enter data for Intrastat in the SRM PO fields and transfer this to ERP PO to exedute the Intrastat report in ERP.
What I have to do in detail to see the fields on the screen like ERP PO if we order goods/services from a EU supplier ?
Kind Regards

Check this Custom solution for implementing Intrastat in SRM (Extended Classic Scenario). I have implemented this in one of my clients and it works without any issues.
Import-Export (Intrastat) data in SRM - Supplier Relationship Management - SCN Wiki
http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/download/attachments/250383577/Custom%20Solution%20for%20INTRASTAT_ERP604_v2.pdf?version=1&…
Hope this helps.
Regards
Venkat

Intrastat report in drop-ship process

Hi,
I have drop-ship scenario where plant country belongs to France ( FR) but actual shipment happens from Taiwan(TW).
Butin the sale order we use plant as France(FR) and shipping point as Taiwan(TW).Since these are drop ships dispatched from non EU countries i.e in my case Taiwan(TW), the intrastat report ignores it. i.e on the invoice document in the "Trade/Custom" tab both "Country of origin" and "Dispatch country" will show as France and the same is picked in Intrastat reporting.
But this is wrong since actual shipment has been done from Taiwan country . Therefore how can we change this to Taiwan i.e correct country. One way is change in the user exit of billing.
but is there any other way, i mean process wise ?. If we do third order sales process would this resolve problem. if so how can this be achieved.
What i have noticed is even in third party sales process it has the same problem.
Thankyou in advance

Thankyou for your reply.
even if i use Foreign Trade concept , but my plant in sales order is "France" and shipping point as "Taiwan", then the problem is instrastat will ignore Taiwan as a departure country , it shows only France as departure country , but it should be Taiwan. Therefore how can we resove this problem.
I dont want to change dispatch country as "Taiwan" using user-exit in invoice-> "customs/Trade" tab , because if i change this field then instrastat report will pick-up . But withoug user-exit how can we change via config or process wise.
Thanks in advance

MEIS Arrival INTRASTAT without GR / IR

Hello All,
In our business scenario we use regular Schedule agreement (LPA) for INTRASTAT Arrivals declarations at Germany plant (DE)for which goods shipped from France country (FR) plant.
We have a very particular scenario where in there is no GR / IR done on the schedule agreement. Instead we call user exit to do transfer posting using MB1B 301 movement.
Since its a cross broder goods receipt, there MUST be INTRASTAT declaration at Germany plant.
There are SAP std settings as below
Table: V_T609IS Foreign Trade: Declarations to Auth: Data Selection Control
            Goods receipt and invoice will be considered
A         Shipping notification and invoice will be considered
B         Only invoice will be considered
C         Report: GR / Import Data: MM Purchase Order
I understand that atleast there is a GR or IR required to declare Arrivals INTRASTAT.
Question: Is there a technical possibility by user exit / program change to by-pass the above checks and still able to declare MEIS Arrivals file?
Any possibilities of MEIS Arrivals generating file without GR and IR as I described above?
Really appreciate your valuable inputs.
Thanks

Hi
Appreciate any thoughts on this?
In our scenario we have sales process and Purchasing process as well. From purchasing perspective Vendor Scheduling agreement created part of standard Buy/selll relationship instead of TSA/STO between two plants (FR and DE plants) under same company code.
To avoid addtional financial postings b/w two plants under same CoCd, MB1B is done 301 movement via user exit from Inbound delivery processing perspective (instead of regular 601 SD and 101 MM mvmnts)
from Arrivals INTRASTAT perpective Vendor SA will be used for declaration and there will be NO goods movement / Invoice (GR / IR)
Foreign Trade/Customs --> Periodic Declarations --> Data Selection Control --> Data Selection Control
Foreign Trade: Declarations to Auth: Data selection control
     Goods receipt and invoice will be considered
A     Shipping notification and invoice will be considered
B     Only invoice will be considered
C     Report: GR / Import Data: MM Purchase Order
Q) With above options only possible, is it feasible to still to achieve INTRASTAT Arrivals at DE.
Q) Any technical / functional options to by pass above check as there is No GR/IR.
Now, we have created new custom t-code ZMEIS which by pass the check for GR ( which we do 301 movement via user exit) and report picking the VEIAV entries. We have put logic to calculate Invoice value = Delivery Qty (No good movement) * gross price A016
while calculating Statistical value (maintained MEK1 @ incoterms) how to pull the respective GRWR condition value at program level to arrive at Statistical value = GRWR * Total invoice value and similarly how to calculate tare mass value.
Really appreciate your inputs!!
Thanks
Edited by: Siva Prasad Jetti on Aug 2, 2011 1:19 AM

Intrastat report Spain. Credit memos posted not appearing in report

Hi
I have a issue where the debit notes raised to vendor are not appearing in Intrastat declaration.
How this debit and credit notes must be taken by Intrastat ? This problem is there since the Intrastat report is being used.
Is there any specific configuration for this or
is there any period check because of which the debit notes are not picked?
The reason is po was created in Feb 2009 and continuous GR and invoice postings happened in subsequent months which are all captured in Intrastat report. A debit note was raised in Sep 2009 which does not appear in the report.
Request your expertise and help to resolve this issue.
Thank you

credit memos are not supported in SAP as you can read in docu:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo2005ao/helpdata/en/F3/4392579F5DC24E9FBE2FA84E9E7660/frameset.htm
Please read the local Intrastat guide, in many countries it just says that you have to file a correction per paper form to your statiscal office.
SAP explains this as well in OSS note 374682:
If a credit memo refers to a billing document which was already declared to authorities, proceed as follows:Here, you should create a written correction to the statistical office.Specify a data record to which the credit memo refers.
Check the documents of the statistical offices for information on when you have to declare the credit memo (limits for values and quantities).*********************************************************************

Intrastat report generation

Hi Experts,
I am facing a problem with VX99 T code .this T code is related "Foreign trade: Cockpit" where we are supposed to generate the INTRASTAT report for the data arrivals (purchase orders) in FRANCE. as of now in the intrastat reporting the data (purchase orders history ) which is related to 122 (EKBE-VGABE = '1' and EKBE-SHKZG = 'H') movement type is getting deleted by the sap standard functionality. the code is available in the the program (RMIMSELS) at line no 7522. but the requirement is what ever the data which is related to 122 movement type should be included in the INTRASTAT reporting for franse.
if it is possible please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks and regards
Mohan

It is not possible in standard, check for any notes
Regards
Chandrasekhar

INTRASTAT / EXTRA - Credit memo not relevant for declaration

Hi all,
I have this problem with INTRASTAT declaration:
Transaction VE08 mark credit memo as not relevant for declaration with this description "No association to a goods movement was found".
Do you have any solutions?

Hello,
check VE80, if you have an exclusion indicator on the item category.
If not try to run VE01 for your country and mark only credit memos. Use log type B. Check the message in the incompletion log. If your credit memos are not in the incompletion log, than run the transaction transaction VE08 you run before again. The credit memos should show up, otheriwse let me know what is the message in the incompletion log.
Check also if you need to show credit memo from legal point. From my point of view it should show only data related to deliveries.
Try and reply.
Edited by: SAPSD1000 on May 25, 2009 6:03 PM

Intrastat/Extrastat Implementation

How do we configure Intrastat/Extrastat reporting in S.D, what are the steps to implement them?
- Sai

hi sai,
just to add some valuable information on intrastat
SAP Electronic Compliance Reporting
Purpose
The single market of the European Union reduces the transactions that are officially recorded to imports and exports with countries outside of the EU. Nonetheless, the recording of country-specific intra-European transactions is just as relevant for individual member states of the European Union, to derive information about a countrys economic strength, foreign trade activities, and trade. Countries can use this data, for example, to implement measures to optimize its trade conditions.
As a result, every company is obliged to record the necessary statistical data. SAP Electronic Compliance Reporting (SAP ECR) supports you with the statistics declarations that you have to submit to the authorities for transactions involving trade between two member states of the EU. Moreover, you have to provide the statistical data in the proper format for your countrys statistics authorities (these formats vary within the EU). The relevant data for the Intrastat declarations is based on the logistics processes. You can collect the Intrastat-relevant data from these logistics processes and submit them to the national statistics authorities in periodic Intrastat declarations.
Implementation Considerations
SAP ECR helps you create Intrastat declarations, where you can enter the relevant items for dispatches and receipts of traded goods, together with the necessary details. To create the Intrastat declaration for your statistics authorities in your country-specific format, you can use SAP ECR to generate the necessary file and send it to the authorities.
Integration
You can use the nomenclature of goods from SAP Customs Management to determine the commodity codes you use to report the products involved in your logistics processes to the authorities. To do so, you have to configure the settings for commodity codes and their integration with SAP ECR in the Implementation Guide (IMG) of SAP Global Trade Services. For more information about the settings, see the Configuration Guide for SAP ECR at the SAP Service Marketplace, under service.sap.com/swdc ® Download ® Installation and Upgrades ® Entry by Application Group ® SAP Application Components ® SAP Global Trade Services (GTS) ® SAP GTS ® Installation and Upgrade.
Features
●      Master data
○       Provider of information
Companies have to notify the statistics authorities of their intra-European transactions that cross their own countries borders. You can define the appropriate information to identify the company providing the information to the authorities in the master data.
○       Default values for import from worklist
The statistics data for a provider of information's trading activities is based on business transactions in the logistics system. If you use integration with this system, SAP ECR collects the relevant information in a worklist. You can define default values to reduce the effort required to import the worklist into a statistics declaration. The system uses these default values for the imported values in the declaration.
○       Commodity codes
If you want to use the nomenclature of goods for commodity codes and have configured integration with SAP ECR, you have to make these numbers available in your system. To do so, you can create the commodity codes and their descriptions manually or upload XML files from your data provider into your system.
○       Classification
The system lets you classify your products with the correct commodity codes once, to optimize the generation of Intrastat declarations. If you use logistics system integration to create Intrastat declarations, the system can find the valid commodity code automatically for each document item in the feeder system and use it instead to create the Intrastat declaration, instead of the product numbers.
●      Worklist
You can create Intrastat declarations based on your logistics processes in the feeder system. Once you configure integration with the logistics system, the relevant business transactions are transferred automatically to a worklist in SAP ECR, from which you can create the Intrastat declarations. You can also display and delete entries in the worklist, as necessary.
●      Intrastat declaration
You use Intrastat declarations to submit binding information about shipments and goods receipts between two countries in the European Union. You can either aggregate the goods movements for a period and direction by statistical goods movement or record the items for each transaction. You can use SAP ECR to create the declaration file to ensure that your trade information meets the data format requirements of your statistics authorities.
regards
sadhu kishore

Problem with Intrastat handling (MEIS)

Dear SCN Members,
we have a problem with Intrastat handling:
Our company is in Great Britain (example VAT-No. GB123456789)
We have a vendor in Switzerland (no EU VAT-No.), who has a fiscal representative in Belgium (example VAT-No. BE1234567890).
Both have a separate vendor number (swiss vendor: 23176, belgian vendor: 33179).
We created a partner "WL" (Goods Supplier) in the vendor master data of the swiss vendor and assigend the belgian vendor number. The swiss vendor master data has nothing filled in the "VAT Reg. No." field (LFA1-STCEG) of the vendor master data. The belgian vendor number has the belgian VAT-No. filled in the "VAT Reg. No." field (LFA1-STCEG) of the vendor master data.
The partner "WL" is automatically taken into the purchase order header partners and is also taken into account for the goods receipt posting.
After I have posted the vendor invoice, the line is shown in transaction MEIS, but the incompletion log is always showing message no. EIP029:
The system did not find the VAT registration number of vendor 23176.
In my opinion, the VAT no. of the fiscal representative (BE1234567890) should be taken into account for the Intrastat reporting, as the swiss vendor has no VAT number. We have not yet managed to get the belgian VAT into the Intrastat report.
Could you please clarify. Thanks in advance for your help!

Hi,
Please refer the KBA: 1988909 - MEIS: Error EIP 029 "The system did not find the VAT registration number of vendor The reason and the solution is well explained in the KBA. You may change the configuration as explained in the KBA and test again.
Regards,
AKPT

Foreign Trade / Intrastat - data order-related billing (downpayments)

Hi,
Shortly we have implemented the down payment functionality in our flows. Because downpayments require order-related billing the intrastat/foreign trade data is not copied into the closing invoice.
Apparently it is only possible to copy the data from a delivery.
We are in a make-to-order environment and we still create deliveries but because of the down payments, the invoice is created from the sales order and hence no intrastat data is copied which ofcourse is required ...
Can't find a suitable user exit for filling this data into the billing document. Also tried using copy data transfer (vofm) filling up tables eikp and eipo but that didn't work.
The only option open for me at the moment is creating a proforma invoice automatically from the delivery. This document can then be included in the intrastat reporting.
Is there another solution ?
with regards

Hi,
in the copy control between order and invoice you need to set the 'determine export data' to 'B' so that it will be redetermined in the invoice. After that the relevant foreign trade userexits will work as well.
Balazs

Config for Dispatch Intrastat

Hello Experts,
Our client has a manufacturing plant in France which is already in SAP. Now they are planning to come up with another plant in France. We will be creating a new Company Code and Sales Org. My question is that since France is already in SAP and uses Intrastat reporting so do we need to make any config for new Plant/Sales Org or is the Intrastat setting defined at country level only.
Regards,
Karan

Hello Karan,
We are going to create a new Plant as well as a new Sales Organisation. In Intrastat there is one setting where we assign Business Transaction Type to Sales Org/Item Category combination. For the reference Sales Org this setting is already in place so do we need to do this setting for new Sales Org also or does it get copied when we create new sales org with reference to existing sales org?
In my view on the current set up which you are incorporating for new plant at France, there is no need to have new Company Code and Sales organization unless and untill there is some legal requirement at EU(If export process needs to be triggered). There is not much information available on Intrastat functionality but as i understand from you, you create Business transaction type at Intrastat, and then assign business transaction type to Sales organization, My suggestion would be :- most likely you would have to extend and include the newly created Sales Organization for Business transaction type.
Thanks,
Sarthak

Intrastat - Returned Goods

Hi All, How do we consider the Returned Goods??? When I create a order type for returned Goods and check the Intrastat Reporting, it shows up in Export (VE01) as negative posting and not in the Goods Receipt. And when I look at the VIEAV Table it shows as Receipt and not Despatch. Any suggestions?
Regards
Sai

Hi Sai,
Check the note 374682 and 883521.
Regards,
Eduardo

Intrastat

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for