Is CE 500 Switch support 802.1q Trunk?

Dear All,
Is Cisco Express 500 switch support 802.1q trunk?
Also, all fastethernet port on CE500 will assign VLAN 10. I would like the switch to allow VLAN 20 and 30 to pass through the trunk? Is it possible?
Thanks.
C.K.

Yesh, set up the port role to switch to make it a trunk.
Unfortunately, the CE500 series switches cannot be managed through a CLI - you have to use CNA.
Hope that helps - pls rate the post if it does.
Paresh

Similar Messages

  • VLAN support on ESW 500 switch

    How many VLANs does the ESW 500 switch support?

    The ESW 500 switch supports a max of 256 VLANs and can accomodate upto 8000 MAC addresses in the CAM table.
    Note, by default on the POE switches, VLANs 1 (data) and 100 (voice) are enabled while on the non POE switches, only VLAN 1 (data) is enabled.

  • Cisco 300 series switches with 802.3at standard

    I'm a bit confused as to which of the 300 series switches supports the 802.3at standard. According to the website, the SG300-28P supports it. But in the quick start guide for the 300 series, only the MP models (excluding the SF302-08MP and SG300-10MP) including the SG300-52P has it. Can someone give me a difinitive answer to this? Thanks!

    LJ,
    P    = PoE capable. On the 300 series, half of the ports can provide 15.4W, or all can provide half that.
    PoE+ is NOT SUPPORTED.
    MP = Maximum Power. This means that all ports can provide up to 15.4W. PoE+ is supported on some models only.
    PP = PoE Plus. Can provide up to 30W on a single port. Note the maximum PoE budget for each switch. Also,
    half of the ports can provide 15.4W, or all can provide half that - any extra power used by PoE+
    MPP = Maximum Power and PoE Plus. This means that all ports can provide up to 15.4W - any extra power used by PoE+
    According to the Data Sheet:
    "Switches support 802.3at PoE+, 802.3af, and Cisco pre-standard (legacy) PoE. Maximum power of 30.0W to any 10/100 or Gigabit Ethernet port for PoE+ supported devices and 15.4W for PoE supported devices, until the PoE budget for the switch is reached"
    The PoE+ models are brand new and are not widey available yet. I did a web search for SG300-28PP and found that at least a few online resellers have it in stock.
    - Marty
    Message was edited by: Martin Pyhala

  • Undersize frame on 802.1Q trunk with extreme switch

    i configure a 802.1Q trunk between 3750 and a summit7i extreme. The show controller ethernet-controller command show that the counter of undersize frame progress regularly. EDP on extreme is off for the ports, also for spanning-tree

    Roger,
    It sounds like it could be a duplex problem. A switch-to-switch connection should be able to run at the fastest speed that the ports have in common, and should be full duplex for maximum performance.
    Undersize packets normally come from collisions in the form of fragments (undersize packets with bad CRC); there shouldn't be any collisions on a full duplex connection, though.
    It could also be that if the Extreme switch is sending undersize packets with good CRC then maybe the software on the Extreme switch needs updating.
    What kind of ports are you using to connect the Cisco Catalyst 3750 to the Extreme Summit7i? What speed and duplex does each side of the link report? Is one side set to autonegotiate, and the other set manually to a fixed speed and/or duplex? What's the distance between the ports? And the media being used: copper UTP, multimode fiber, or single-mode fiber?
    If copper (RJ45 connector) on the Extreme switch, it could be to either a Gigabit-only Ethernet GBIC; or built-in autonegotiating 100/1000BASE-T, depending on the model number of the switch. On the Cisco switch, it could be 10/100 or 10/100/1000 depending on the switch model, or 1000-only if you're using the 1000BASE-T SFP.
    If fiber (SC or MT-RJ connectors) on the Extreme switch, I don't recall whether their Gigabit-only fiber ports give you the option of what duplex you run. But the Cisco switch's Gigabit-only fiber ports always run in full duplex mode only.
    Whatever ports you're using, the actual connection speed and duplex on each end of the switch-to-switch link need to match. Either both ends autonegotiate to matching values; or you need to manually set these values.
    Here's a link that might also be useful:
    Troubleshooting Switch Port and Interface Problems
    http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/53.shtml
    Hope this helps.

  • 802.1q trunk b/w 8PoE switch integrated in 1861 CME

    Hi,
    I have to deploy cme7.0 (1861). Actually two 1861 routers are bought but only one of them act as cme while the 8PoE integrated switch of other 1861 is used. half of the IP phones are connected to the 8PoE integrated switch in CME (1861 router) while half of the phones are connected to 8PoE of 1861 (only 1861's PoE is used in this setup). i want to know whether i can cascade the two switches or in other words whether i can form a 802.1q trunk b/w these switches to carry the voice and data vlans.
    Regards
    Naresh Rathore

    Yes, you can.

  • 802.1q trunking with 3rd party switch

    I'm setting up a project that requires a cisco router, which is capable of doing 802.1q trunking. This is the only function I need to test with a 3rd party switch. What is the cheapest router that I can use to accomplish this.

    Hi,
    This should be the one:
    http://cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps380/ps6942/product_data_sheet0900aecd804b1b19.html
    Please rate if this helped.
    Regards,
    Daniel

  • Does 6509 switch support CDP bypass feature when interface configured with IEEE 802.1X?

     hi, guys
            we are deploying CISCO video endpoints (SX 20) for out customers, as the access switch is 6509 which version is 12.2(33)SXJ5
    following is the configuration on the interface, but the endpoints can not pass through the authentication, and also it can not get  IP address
    from DHCP server , so just want to know whether if the 6509 switch support CDP BYPASS feature?
    interface GigabitEthernet x/xx
     switchport
     switchport access vlan 400
     switchport mode access
     switchport voice vlan 409
     authentication host-mode multi-domain
     authentication port-control auto
     authentication timer reauthenticate 65535
     authentication timer inactivity 120
     authentication violation restrict
     dot1x pae authenticator
     dot1x timeout tx-period 5
     dot1x timeout supp-timeout 10
     spanning-tree portfast edge

    What image are you running now ? I am facing the same problem in 8.4(1) workround : upgrade to 8.4(2)GLX.

  • CE-500 switches

    Does the new catalyst express 500 series switch support VLAN - dot1q

    Sanjeev,
    CE500 does support 802.1q. You can find relevant documentation about this, under Product Specifications in this link.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6545/products_data_sheet0900aecd80322aeb.html

  • Support 802.1q at WAE device?

    Hi.
    I'm sy jeon
    I wonder if the cisco WAAS support 802.1q.
    We are planing to attach the cisco wae to ethernet switch.
    as you know, we should configure the two vlan to WAE, one for PBR, wccpv2, other to return the traffic to router.
    if so,How can I configure 802.1q in WAE,
    if our network configuration is incorrect, please give me advide about that.
    Thank you.

    Hello Sy,
    Cisco WAAS does support 802.1Q. It depends on your deployment setup. If you are using WCCP, there will be no need to configure dot1q trunk as the traffic will be handled either by redirect/return method. For the return method, it can be either ip forwarding (WAAS will used configured default gateway) or GRE Return if using a configured egress method of negotiated return or Generic GRE.
    If you are using inline interception, meaning you will be using an inline card to intercept the traffic, then you can configure dot1q trunk for the inline ports and define which VLANs you would like to intercept and optimize traffic on.
    Let me know if this answers your question.
    -Ramon

  • Does the SLM224G switch support port-based VLAN's?

    I am looking for a simple solution to create two LAN's. One for my own and one for my customers, who will be able to use desktop PC's with internet access. I have only one internet connection (DSL over ISDN) and wil not getting another just for my customers.
    My own network should not be accessible or visible to users who are using the customers-PC's. The other way around is allowed, but not really necessary. My setup requires me to hook up the switch to the (ISP) router, and that router just has one LAN port not able to do anything related to VLAN's.
    I read about port-based VLAN's here, where it is stated that creating seperate LAN's is just putting ports into VLAN's on the switch, nothing else needs to be done... However, they used a NetGear smart switch.
    I checked out Cisco's SLM224G as it is affordable, has 24 ports (instead of 8 for the NetGear) and should support VLAN's. I have read a lot about VLAN's, including:
    "- Port-based VLAN's means that you can reconfigure ports to be in different VLAN's. Port-based VLAN's do not confirm 802.1q VLAN support.
    - 802.1q VLAN's means that you can tag VLAN's with 802.1q headers to create a trunk between two devices that carries frames for multiple VLAN's. 802.1q VLAN's confirm that there is also Port-based VLAN support."
    I known from the spec sheets that the SLM224G supports 802.1q (tagged) trunking. So it should, given found text above, also support port-based VLAN's.
    My question is whether it indeed will support port-based VLAN's?
    Am I able to use it directly behind my ISP's router and create two seperate LAN's?
    If so, one extra question: how are the PC's behind the switch (inside the two VLAN's) get their IP-adresses from the ISP-router? Or will it service only one of the two LAN's and should I install a DHCP-server in the other LAN?
    Any information is very welcome!
    Thank you.

    Thanks for your responce, mr. Carr.
    I have read more about vlan's and their setup. I think the article about port based vlan's was lacking some information about the router/firewall. May be it was set up to work with different vlan's from the start. Strangely, in the text it is said that nothing needs to be set up besides the (Netgear) vlan-capable switch.
    So, from your response and other texts I learned I needed a vlan-capable router. I have to say that I need to be able to manage a server on the LAN from the outside (internet). I already tried to set up a Cisco/Linksys WRT54G router behind the ISP's (ZyXel) single LAN-ported router and that would not work at all (even when the Linksys was set in router-mode). I lost the connection to internet setting it up that way. I even tried to setup the Linksys in the DMZ of the ZyXel, with no luck. I was unable to set that up with working internet-access form the LAN. So I was not too happy with the suggestion to set up a (second) vlan-capable gigabit router behind the ISP's router....
    Eventually, I bridged the ZyXel to get rid of the double NAT/gateway mode of the two routers as routing mode did not work on the Linksys. The Linksys is now getting the WAN-ip from the ISP on it's WAN port and I furthermore used DD-WRT's firmware to enable the build-in vlan-capabilities of the Linksys.
    Now I have set up the Linksys with two vlan's and I bought the SLM224G as an inexpensive manageable 24-port vlan-capable switch to provide the number of ports I needed. I devided the SLM in two vlan's and used two wires from the Linksys to the SLM. So the SLM does support port-based vlan's by simply setting up two ranges of ports with different PVID settings. Trunking and 802.1q tagging isn't needed that way. I know I could have used two dumb switches to get two separate subnetted networks, but this way I get just enough ports in a single device where I have ample space to put it.
    Anyway, thanks for helping me understanding the way vlan-capable switches work.

  • AEBSn - Unable to switch to 802.11n - Installation Bugged!

    If you have a fairly recent Mac and an AEBS which supports 802.11n (the Gigabit or "802.11n" model) then you are supposed to be able to get 802.11n which has advantages over 802.11g.
    I run late-2006 iMacs and these are 802.11n possible machines, providing 802.11n has been enabled. Downloading the "2007-002" enabler is not necessary, as the enabler will tell you. That's because a similar enabler is embedded into the AEBS installer on the supplied disc.
    I assumed that the instal process for the Gigabit AEBS would handle things automatically in terms of getting everything moving at 802.11n speed or at least allow easy selection.
    Nothing like it. This is a warning to others.
    I noticed in my Airport Utility that I was running at 2.4GHz and not 5GHz which is for 802.11n. So clever me decided to simply switch and restart my AEBS. (An incentive too was to move above all the shops across the road. They seem to have channels 1, 6, and 11 working hard.)
    Lost my connection to the AEBS as a result of that. The AEBS instal process did NOT update my computers to support 802.11n. Can be checked via Network Utilities. I hadn't thought to check first.
    133MAC in Australia were very helpful - they spent almost an hour working through things his morning. Top Notch support!
    Solution required the Airport instal to be rerun but a lot of other poking around first in order that the embedded 802.11n enabler would indeed run. And you'll need a LAN cable and possibly need to move one computer over to the AEBS!
    Couldn't find an Apple Knowledgebase article on this problem with the Airport instal disc but I suspect it is a known issue.
    (I had nothing quirky in my network setup / machines. All using the most recent system software updates, default settings in network and sharing preferences and so on)

    Yes I know about all that as these are the very options presented in the pop-up menu on the relevant configuration tab.
    What I'm saying is that selecting the 5GHz option resulted in my iMacs being unable to communicate with the AEBSn through WiFi - the 5GHz spectrum.
    Leaving the AEBSn in "default radio mode" as you call it will mean that it will actually be using 802.11g at 2.4GHz due to its inability to use 802.11n at 2.4GHz or 5GHz. The Apple Tech people I spoke to recognised this.
    Many purchasers of the AEBSn, like myself, will really want to take advantage of the 802.11n capabilities in the 5GHz spectrum. They wish to dedictae the AEBSn to 5GHz throughput and deliberately exclude 802.11b/g on their AEBSn. Let some other boxes take care of that in the 2.4GHz range.
    For a little home office thing with a mix of old and new clients the default setting for the AEBSn is a very good thing as the admin doesn't really care about throughput.

  • Does FCoE require 802.1q trunking?

    Since PFC in FCoE requires 802.1p CoS value, is it a requirement to use an 802.1q trunk for devices connected to a Nexus 10Gb Ethernet port?  There is a configuration command "priority-flow-control on" at the interface level.  Will this add the 802.1p value in the packet without requiring 802.1q trunking?

    Thanks for the answer.  I have since found the relevant documentation regarding this configuration requirement.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/configuration/guide/cli_rel_4_1/Cisco_Nexus_5000_Series_Switch_CLI_Software_Configuration_Guide_chapter31.html#con_1288667

  • Predictions: When will Lenovo X-series support 802.11ac ?

    When do you predict we will see a Lenovo X-series laptop introduced that supports 802.11ac ?
    FYI - 2 sites I read for reliable tech info, including home networking:
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/7127/the-joys-of-80211ac-wifi
    http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-reviews
    I'm getting 375-405 mbps by hanging this orb
    ASUS Dual-Band Wireless-N900 USB Network Adapter
    http://amzn.to/14ql6WG
    off my downstairs Thinkpad's USB port .
    That orb pairs with an ASUS RT-N66U Dual-Band Wireless-N900 upstairs.
    On the downside, it's something permanently plugged into my USB port. 
    On the upside, with a USB cord extender, it easily stays put on the laptop coffee table.  And I like the idea of the antenna being further away from my brain.  Most importantly, the performance is compelling. (it seems to be twice as fast as before)

    Any Lenovo laptop with mini PCI-E port should support 802.11ac as long as there's no whitelist in the BIOS. I could've put the Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 on my Y470, but instead I chose the Intel Dual Band Wireless-N 7260 since the Wireless-AC version has a bluetooth integrated which conflicts with my Broadcom bluetooth that came with the laptop. The Wireless-AC itself works, but both my Broadcom bluetooth and Intel's bluetooth won't work (they both show an yellow triangle with exclamation point on Device manager). The Wireless-N version has no bluetooth so the built-in Broadcom bluetooth works fully.
    Lenovo Y470: i7-2670QM | 8 GB DDR3 1333 MHz RAM | Nvidia GeForce GT 550M | 500 GB 7200 RPM Seagate HDD | ASUS PCE-AC56 802.11ac Network Adapter | Windows 7 Professional 64-bit

  • 3750g-Routing kills 802.1q trunk

    I don't know how much help you guys can be, but here goes.
    I have a procurve 4104gl that is using 802.1q to connect to my Cat 3750g
    All things are good when the 3750g is in L2 mode. My 3750g can ping the 4104gl ip of 10.120.255.11 and the 3750's vlans ips (Vlan255=255.1,Vl254-254.1), 252.1, 253.1 and 254.1 can ping 255.11 using extended ping.
    I activate routing on the 3750g via:
    config t
    ip routing
    and no interface can ping the procurve with extended ping and only my 255.1 interface can ping the procurve ip of 255.11
    Trunk is still "up" according the the 3750g went the routing is enabled. So not losing my 802.1q trunk.
    If I remove the "routing" from the 3750g, all connectivity is back to normal.
    attached is how-to-trunk Procurve and Cat switches for everyones enjoyment

    thanks guys, no default gateway on the 3750.
    Here is the weird thing.
    I can take 3750 do a "no ip routing" to turn off routing.
    have 4 vlans setup
    10.120.255.3 /24 Hsrp is .1
    10.102.252.3 /24 hsrp is .1
    I plug laptop into the L2 vlan is is 10.120.252.250
    have a hub pluged into vlan 252 just to bring up the vlan for pings.
    And the laptop with dfg 252.1 can ping the 10.120.255.1 interface on the switch.
    Yep, the 252 interface has "switchport access vlan 252" on my g1/0/2 interface
    g1/0/12 has switchport access vlan 255 in it.
    Enabling IP routing does the same thing, pings are good.
    so, in short I can ping from laptop on vlan 252 to my switchs vlan 255 interface in L2 mode.
    thoughts?

  • What network adaptors support 802.11ac?

    I want to purchase the new airport/time capsule mainly for it's 802.11ac capabilities. I have a mid-2009 macbook pro.
    Wondering what network adaptors are out there that I can plug into my usb that can support 802.11ac? I found some but they only support Windows.

    Newer AC wireless would need to support USB 3 standard but of course that is not available.
    I want to purchase the new airport/time capsule mainly for it's 802.11ac capabilities. I have a mid-2009 macbook pro.
    You only have one port that is near capable (actually more than capable if real numbers are used) and that is ethernet. So the best device for you is a second Airport Extreme working as bridge or extend wireless in apple terminology.. really it is not such a bad option since the cost of AC usb 3.0 will be over $100 anyway.

Maybe you are looking for